82 FR 43064 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 176 (September 13, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 176 (September 13, 2017)
| Page Range | 43064-43066 | |
| FR Document | 2017-19378 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 43064-43066] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-19378] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-81549; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2017-08] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule September 7, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on August 31, 2017, NYSE American LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE American'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self- regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule. The proposed change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this filing is to amend the Fee Schedule effective September 1, 2017. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to modify the surcharge that is applied to certain Complex Orders executed on the Exchange. Currently, the Exchange imposes a $0.05 per contract surcharge for any Electronic Non-Customer Complex Order that executes against a Customer Complex Order, regardless of whether the execution occurs in a Complex Order Auction (the ``Surcharge'').\4\ The Exchange proposes to modify the Surcharge to $0.10 per contract, which surcharge is comparable to charges imposed by other options exchanges.\5\ For clarity, the Exchange also proposes to make clear that the Surcharge is applied on a ``per contract'' basis.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Fee Schedule, Section I.A., n. 6, available here, https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf. Per the Fee Schedule, a ``Customer'' is an individual or organization that is not a Broker- Dealer, per Rule 900.2NY(18); and is not a Professional Customer; and a ``Non-Customer'' is anyone who is not a Customer. See id., Fee Schedule, Key Terms and Definitions. Thus, Non-Customers include Specialists, e-Specialists, Directed Order Market Makers, Firms, Broker Dealers, and Professional Customers. The Exchange notes that Firm Facilitation trades are not electronic and are therefore not subject to the Surcharge. \5\ See MIAX Options fee schedule, available here, https://www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Options_Fee_Schedule_08072017.pdf (imposing a $0.10 on certain complex orders). See also The Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (``CBOE'') fee schedule, available here, http://www.cboe.com/publish/feeschedule/CBOEFeeSchedule.pdf, at n. 35 (same). \6\ See proposed Fee Schedule, Section I.A., n. 6. The Exchange also proposes to correct a typographical error referring to ``a CUBE Auctions'' by removing the word ``a.'' See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additionally, to encourage ATP Holders to transact additional Non- Customer Complex Orders on the Exchange, the Exchange proposes to offer a reduced Surcharge for those ATP Holders that meet a certain volume threshold. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to reduce the per contract surcharge to $0.07 for any ATP Holder that transacts at least 0.20% of Total Industry Customer equity and ETF option average daily volume (or TCADV) of Electronic Non-Customer Complex Order Executions in a month. Finally, the Exchange proposes to add ``TCADV'' as a defined term in the Key [[Page 43065]] Terms and Definitions section of the Fee Schedule, which would add clarity and transparency to the Fee Schedule.\7\ As proposed, TCADV would refer to ``Total Industry Customer equity and ETF option average daily volume that includes OCC calculated Customer volume of all types, including Complex Order Transactions and QCC transactions, in equity and ETF options.'' \8\ This proposed definition is consistent with how other options exchanges define this term.\9\ Consistent with this proposed change, the Exchange proposes to utilize this defined term in Section I.E. regarding the American Customer Engagement (``ACE'') Program.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Fee Schedule, Preface, Key Terms and Definitions. \8\ See proposed Fee Schedule, Preface, Key Terms and Definitions. \9\ See e.g., NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule, Endnote 8. \10\ See proposed Fee Schedule, Section I.E. The Exchange also proposes to fix a typographical error and add the word ``for'' to the end of the first paragraph describing the ACE Program, which would clearly provide that the ACE Program offers ``two methods for OFPs to receive credits'' (emphasis added). See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes the proposed increase to the Surcharge is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory, as it applies to all similarly situated Non-Customer Complex Orders. Applying the Surcharge, as modified, to market participant orders except Customer orders is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because Customer order flow enhances liquidity on the Exchange for the benefit of all market participants. Specifically, Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more trading opportunities, which attracts Market Makers. An increase in the activity of Specialists and Market Makers in turn facilitates tighter spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants. In addition, the proposed surcharge is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory as it is consistent with fees charged by other options exchanges.\13\ For example, MIAX imposes a $0.10 ``Per Contract Surcharge for Removing Liquidity Against A Resting Priority Customer Complex Order on the Strategy Book'' for all option classes), which may result in an overall per contract fee of $0.60.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See supra note 5. \14\ See MIAX fee schedule, supra note 5 (providing for a potential total per contract fee of $0.60 for Market Makers, which includes a ``Complex Per Contract Fee for Penny Classes,'' a per contract ``Marketing Fee,'' and a $0.10 ``Per Contract Surcharge for Removing Liquidity Against a Resting Priority Customer Complex Order on the Strategy Book for Penny and Non-Penny Classes''). The Exchange believes that MIAX does not subject transactions in a complex order auction to any fee cap. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80262 (March 16, 2017), 82 FR 14779 (March 22, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-15) (establishing the Surcharge). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, the Exchange believes that the proposal to offer a reduced surcharge to those ATP Holders that achieve certain volume thresholds is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange believes the proposed reduced rate is reasonably designed to encourage ATP Holders that transact Non-Customer Complex Orders to direct more of this order flow to the Exchange to qualify for the reduced rates. The proposed rates are reasonable and equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they apply equally to all ATP Holders that transact Non-Customer Complex Orders. In addition, the proposed changes are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because, while only Non- Customer Complex Orders qualify for the reduced surcharge, the Exchange believes any increase in Non-Customer Complex Orders would result in greater volume and liquidity being attracted to the Exchange, which benefit all market participants by providing more trading opportunities and tighter spreads.\15\ To the extent this goal is achieved, the Exchange would improve its overall competitiveness and strengthen its market quality for all market participants. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ The Exchange notes that it does not impose any fee on Electronic executions of Customer interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposal to define ``TCADV'' in the Fee Schedule, as well as to fix the typographical errors in Section I.A.\16\ and I.E.,\17\ is likewise reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would add clarity and transparency to the Fee Schedule to the benefit of all market participants. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See supra note 6. \17\ See supra note 10. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the Act. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\18\ the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed modification to the Surcharge would not impose an unfair burden on competition as it is consistent with fees charged by other exchanges.\19\ Further, the proposal to reduce the surcharge for certain ATP Holders that achieve certain volume thresholds would likewise not impose an unfair burden on competition because it is designed to attract Non-Customer Complex Orders to the Exchange. To the extent that this purpose is achieved, this proposal would enhance the quality of the Exchange's markets and increase the volume of Complex Orders traded here. In turn, all the Exchange's market participants would benefit from the improved market liquidity. If the proposed changes make the Exchange a more attractive marketplace for market participants at other exchanges, such market participants are welcome to become ATP Holders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). \19\ See supra note 5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \20\ of the Act and [[Page 43066]] subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \21\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \22\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2017-08 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2017-08. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2017-08, and should be submitted on or before October 4, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-19378 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![43064 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 13, 2017 / Notices
burden hours associated with the Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Pamela the places specified in Item IV below.
adoption and documentation Dyson, Director/Chief Information The Exchange has prepared summaries,
requirement is 10,185 hours. Officer, Securities and Exchange set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
All funds are required to conduct an Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, of the most significant parts of such
annual review of the adequacy of their 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 statements.
existing policies and procedures and the or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@
policies and procedures of each A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to
investment adviser, principal Statement of the Purpose of, and the
OMB within 30 days of this notice.
underwriter, administrator, and transfer Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Dated: September 8, 2017. Change
agent of the fund, and the effectiveness
Eduardo A. Aleman,
of their implementation. In addition, 1. Purpose
Assistant Secretary.
each fund chief compliance officer is The purpose of this filing is to amend
required to prepare an annual report [FR Doc. 2017–19446 Filed 9–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
the Fee Schedule effective September 1,
that addresses the operation of the 2017. Specifically, the Exchange
policies and procedures of the fund and proposes to modify the surcharge that is
the policies and procedures of each applied to certain Complex Orders
investment adviser, principal SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION executed on the Exchange.
underwriter, administrator, and transfer Currently, the Exchange imposes a
agent of the fund, any material changes [Release No. 34–81549; File No. SR– $0.05 per contract surcharge for any
made to those policies and procedures NYSEAMER–2017–08] Electronic Non-Customer Complex
since the date of the last report, any Order that executes against a Customer
material changes to the policies and Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and Complex Order, regardless of whether
procedures recommended as a result of the execution occurs in a Complex
the annual review, and certain Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Order Auction (the ‘‘Surcharge’’).4 The
compliance matters that occurred since Exchange proposes to modify the
the date of the last report. The staff American Options Fee Schedule
Surcharge to $0.10 per contract, which
estimates that each fund spends 49 September 7, 2017. surcharge is comparable to charges
hours per year, on average, conducting Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the imposed by other options exchanges.5
the annual review and preparing the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the For clarity, the Exchange also proposes
annual report to the board of directors. ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 to make clear that the Surcharge is
Thus, we estimate that the annual notice is hereby given that, on August applied on a ‘‘per contract’’ basis.6
aggregate burden hours associated with 31, 2017, NYSE American LLC (the Additionally, to encourage ATP
the annual review and annual report ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE American’’) filed Holders to transact additional Non-
requirement is 202,517 hours. with the Securities and Exchange Customer Complex Orders on the
Finally, the staff estimates that each Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the Exchange, the Exchange proposes to
fund spends 6 hours annually, on proposed rule change as described in offer a reduced Surcharge for those ATP
average, maintaining the records Items I, II, and III below, which Items Holders that meet a certain volume
required by proposed Rule 38a–1. Thus, have been prepared by the self- threshold. Specifically, the Exchange
the annual aggregate burden hours regulatory organization. The proposes to reduce the per contract
associated with the recordkeeping Commission is publishing this notice to surcharge to $0.07 for any ATP Holder
requirement is 24,798 hours. solicit comments on the proposed rule that transacts at least 0.20% of Total
In total, the staff estimates that the Industry Customer equity and ETF
change from interested persons.
aggregate annual information collection option average daily volume (or
burden of Rule 38a–1 is 237,500 hours. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s TCADV) of Electronic Non-Customer
The estimate of burden hours is made Statement of the Terms of Substance of Complex Order Executions in a month.
solely for the purposes of the Paperwork the Proposed Rule Change Finally, the Exchange proposes to add
Reduction Act. The estimate is not The Exchange proposes to modify the ‘‘TCADV’’ as a defined term in the Key
derived from a comprehensive or even NYSE American Options Fee Schedule.
a representative survey or study of the The proposed change is available on the 4 See Fee Schedule, Section I.A., n. 6, available
costs of Commission rules. Complying Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, here, https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/
with this collection of information markets/american-options/NYSE_American_
at the principal office of the Exchange, Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf. Per the Fee Schedule, a
requirement is mandatory. Responses and at the Commission’s Public ‘‘Customer’’ is an individual or organization that is
will not be kept confidential. An agency Reference Room. not a Broker-Dealer, per Rule 900.2NY(18); and is
may not conduct or sponsor, and a not a Professional Customer; and a ‘‘Non-Customer’’
person is not required to respond to, a II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s is anyone who is not a Customer. See id., Fee
Schedule, Key Terms and Definitions. Thus, Non-
collection of information unless it Statement of the Purpose of, and Customers include Specialists, e-Specialists,
displays a currently valid control Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Directed Order Market Makers, Firms, Broker
number. Change Dealers, and Professional Customers. The Exchange
notes that Firm Facilitation trades are not electronic
The public may view the background In its filing with the Commission, the and are therefore not subject to the Surcharge.
documentation for this information self-regulatory organization included 5 See MIAX Options fee schedule, available here,
collection at the following Web site, statements concerning the purpose of, https://www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Options_Fee_Schedule_
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
and basis for, the proposed rule change 08072017.pdf (imposing a $0.10 on certain complex
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the and discussed any comments it received orders). See also The Chicago Board Options
Securities and Exchange Commission, on the proposed rule change. The text Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CBOE’’) fee schedule, available
Office of Information and Regulatory of those statements may be examined at here, http://www.cboe.com/publish/feeschedule/
Affairs, Office of Management and CBOEFeeSchedule.pdf, at n. 35 (same).
6 See proposed Fee Schedule, Section I.A., n. 6.
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). The Exchange also proposes to correct a
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. typographical error referring to ‘‘a CUBE Auctions’’
or by sending an email to: Shagufta_ 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. by removing the word ‘‘a.’’ See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Sep 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_43240/page/1.svg)
![43066 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 13, 2017 / Notices
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 21 Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., locations. The following areas have been
thereunder, because it establishes a due, Washington, DC 20549, on official determined to be adversely affected by
fee, or other charge imposed by the business days between the hours of the disaster:
Exchange. 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the Primary Areas (Physical Damage and
At any time within 60 days of the filing also will be available for Economic Injury Loans): Saint John,
filing of such proposed rule change, the inspection and copying at the principal Saint Thomas
Commission summarily may office of the Exchange. All comments Contiguous Areas (Economic Injury
temporarily suspend such rule change if received will be posted without change; Loans Only): None
it appears to the Commission that such the Commission does not edit personal The Interest Rates are:
action is necessary or appropriate in the identifying information from
public interest, for the protection of submissions. You should submit only Percent
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of information that you wish to make
the purposes of the Act. If the available publicly. All submissions For Physical Damage:
Commission takes such action, the should refer to File Number SR– Homeowners with Credit Avail-
Commission shall institute proceedings able Elsewhere ...................... 3.500
NYSEAMER–2017–08, and should be Homeowners without Credit
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 22 of the Act to submitted on or before October 4, 2017. Available Elsewhere .............. 1.750
determine whether the proposed rule
For the Commission, by the Division of Businesses with Credit Avail-
change should be approved or Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated able Elsewhere ...................... 6.610
disapproved. authority.23 Businesses without Credit
IV. Solicitation of Comments Eduardo A. Aleman, Available Elsewhere .............. 3.305
Non-Profit Organizations with
Interested persons are invited to Assistant Secretary.
Credit Available Elsewhere ... 2.500
submit written data, views, and [FR Doc. 2017–19378 Filed 9–12–17; 8:45 am] Non-Profit Organizations with-
arguments concerning the foregoing, BILLING CODE 8011–01–P out Credit Available Else-
including whether the proposed rule where ..................................... 2.500
change is consistent with the Act. For Economic Injury:
Comments may be submitted by any of Businesses & Small Agricultural
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Cooperatives without Credit
the following methods:
[Disaster Declaration #15293 and #15294; Available Elsewhere .............. 3.305
Electronic Comments U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Disaster Number VI– Non-Profit Organizations with-
00009] out Credit Available Else-
• Use the Commission’s Internet where ..................................... 2.500
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Presidential Declaration of a Major
rules/sro.shtml); or Disaster for the U.S. Virgin Islands The number assigned to this disaster
• Send an email to rule-comments@ for physical damage is 152938 and for
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– AGENCY: U.S. Small Business economic injury is 152940.
NYSEAMER–2017–08 on the subject Administration.
line. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
ACTION: Notice. Number 59008)
Paper Comments
SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the James E. Rivera,
• Send paper comments in triplicate Presidential declaration of a major Associate Administrator for Disaster
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange disaster for the U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Assistance.
Commission, 100 F Street NE., (FEMA–4335–DR), dated 09/07/2017. [FR Doc. 2017–19447 Filed 9–12–17; 8:45 am]
Washington, DC 20549–1090. Incident: Hurricane Irma. BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
All submissions should refer to File Incident Period: 09/06/2017 and
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2017–08. This continuing.
file number should be included on the DATES: Issued on 09/07/2017. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
subject line if email is used. To help the Physical Loan Application Deadline [Docket No: SSA–2017–0050]
Commission process and review your Date: 11/06/2017.
comments more efficiently, please use Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Agency Information Collection
only one method. The Commission will Application Deadline Date: 06/07/2018. Activities: Proposed Request and
post all comments on the Commission’s Comment Request
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
applications to: U.S. Small Business The Social Security Administration
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
Administration, Processing and (SSA) publishes a list of information
submission, all subsequent
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport collection packages requiring clearance
amendments, all written statements
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. by the Office of Management and
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Budget (OMB) in compliance with
Commission, and all written Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork
communications relating to the U.S. Small Business Administration, Reduction Act of 1995, effective October
proposed rule change between the 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, 1, 1995. This notice includes revisions
Commission and any person, other than Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734. of OMB-approved information
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
those that may be withheld from the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is collections.
public in accordance with the hereby given that as a result of the SSA is soliciting comments on the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be President’s major disaster declaration on accuracy of the agency’s burden
available for Web site viewing and 09/07/2017, applications for disaster estimate; the need for the information;
printing in the Commission’s Public loans may be filed at the address listed its practical utility; ways to enhance its
above or other locally announced quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to
21 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). minimize burden on respondents,
22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 23 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). including the use of automated
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Sep 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_43240/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-09-13 00:08:56
Document Modified: 2017-09-13 00:08:56
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 43064 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR