82 FR 48906 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 203 (October 23, 2017)

Page Range		48906-48910
FR Document		2017-22709
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of reduction of the de-icing performance of the pitot probe over time that could remain hidden to the flight crew. This AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the pitot probe heater insulation resistance, and replacement of the pitot probe heater if necessary. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48906-48910]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22709]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0497; Product Identifier 2016-NM-209-AD; Amendment 
39-19078; AD 2017-21-07]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all 
Airbus Model A300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of 
reduction of the de-icing performance of the pitot probe over time that 
could remain hidden to the flight crew. This

[[Page 48907]]

AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the pitot probe heater 
insulation resistance, and replacement of the pitot probe heater if 
necessary. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on 
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective November 27, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 27, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, 
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice 
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; 
fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email: [email protected]; 
Internet: http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service 
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue 
SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material 
at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at 
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. 
FAA-2017-0497.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0497; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone: 
800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, 
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind 
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 425-227-2125; fax: 425-
227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus Model A300 
series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May 30, 
2017 (82 FR 24601) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by a report of 
reduction of the de-icing performance of the pitot probe over time that 
could remain hidden to the flight crew. The NPRM proposed to require 
repetitive detailed inspections of the pitot probe heater insulation 
resistance, and replacement of the pitot probe heater if necessary. We 
are issuing this AD to ensure nominal de-icing performance of the pitot 
probe in order to prevent unreliable airspeed indications, which could 
result in reduced control of the airplane.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD 
2016-0248, dated December 15, 2016 (referred to after this as the 
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to 
correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes. 
The MCAI states:

    An operator reported a reduction of the deicing performance of 
the pitot probe over the time. Pitot probes are heated to prevent 
ice accretion. De-icing performances of the Pitot probe might be 
reduced if Pitot probe heater degrades over time. Investigation 
results highlighted that the magnitude of de-icing performance 
reduction depended on how much the [pitot probe] heater is degraded. 
This degradation could remain hidden to the crew.
    Pitot probes heater degradation, if not detected and corrected, 
could lead to unreliable airspeed indications, possibly resulting in 
reduced control of the aeroplane.
    To ensure nominal de-icing performances of the Pitot probe, 
Airbus developed an inspection process to check the pitot [probe] 
heater performance, and published Service Bulletin (SB) A300-34-0185 
to provide the necessary instructions to operators.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires 
repetitive detailed inspections (DET) of the pitot [probe] heater, 
and, depending on findings, replacement with a serviceable one.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0497.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and 
the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Reduce the Maximum Possible Initial Compliance Time

    The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) expressed its 
partial support for the NPRM. ALPA requested that we change the 
introductory text of paragraph (h) of the proposed AD from ``. . . 
whichever occurs later . . .'' to ``. . . whichever occurs first . . 
.'' ALPA is concerned that a possible duration of 30 months to comply 
with the initial inspection requirement of the NPRM is too long and 
could adversely affect safety. ALPA also mentioned that they preferred 
that no more than 24 months pass between inspections.
    We do not agree with the commenter's request to shorten the 
compliance time. After considering the available information, we have 
determined that the compliance time, as proposed, represents an 
appropriate interval of time in which the required actions can be 
performed in a timely manner within the affected fleet, while still 
maintaining an adequate level of safety. In developing an appropriate 
compliance time, we considered the safety implications, parts 
availability, and normal maintenance schedules for timely 
accomplishment of the detailed inspections. The proposed compliance 
time corresponds with the compliance times specified in the MCAI. 
Additionally, the affected airplanes are currently in storage. To 
reduce the compliance time of the proposed AD would necessitate (under 
the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act) reissuing the 
notice, reopening the period for public comment, considering additional 
comments subsequently received, and eventually issuing a final rule. 
That process would delay issuance of the final rule. In light of this, 
and in consideration of the amount of time that has already elapsed 
since issuance of the original notice, we have determined that further 
delay of this AD is not appropriate. We have not changed this AD in 
this regard.

Request To Reduce Compliance Time for Reporting

    Airbus recommended that we reduce the compliance time for reporting 
from 30 days to 10 days (after the effective date of this AD) for 
inspections with findings. No further justification was provided.
    We do not agree with the commenter's request to reduce the 
compliance time for reporting. After considering the available 
information, we have determined that the compliance time for reporting 
findings, as proposed, represents an appropriate interval of time in 
which the required actions can be performed in a timely manner within 
the affected fleet, while still maintaining an adequate level of 
safety. To reduce the reporting compliance time of this AD would, as 
mentioned previouly, necessitate reissuing the notice, reopening the 
period for public comment, considering additional comments subsequently 
received, and

[[Page 48908]]

eventually issuing a final rule. In light of this, we have determined 
that the 30-day compliance time for reporting is appropriate. We have 
not changed this AD in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have 
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Airbus Service Bulletin A300-34-0185, Revision 
00, dated August 29, 2016. The service information describes procedures 
for repetitive detailed inspections of the pitot probe heater 
insulation resistance and replacement of the pitot probe heater. This 
service information is reasonably available because the interested 
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by 
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 5 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                 Cost on U.S.
             Action                     Labor cost          Parts cost     Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive inspection..........  5 work-hours x $85 per               $0  $425 per            $2,125 per
                                  hour = $425 per                          inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
                                  inspection cycle.
Reporting......................  1 work hour x $85 per                $0  $85 per inspection  $425 per
                                  hour = $85 per                           cycle.              inspection cycle.
                                  inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacement 
that will be required based on the results of the required inspection. 
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need 
this replacement:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Cost per
                   Action                                 Labor cost                Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement................................  3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255.          $9,015          $9,270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for 
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the 
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of 
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control 
number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120-
0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in 
the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for 
reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the 
collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with 
this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden 
and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA 
at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, ATTN: Information 
Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the 
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by 
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is 
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but 
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the 
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to 
the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications 
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator,

[[Page 48909]]

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2017-21-07 Airbus: Amendment 39-19078; Docket No. FAA-2017-0497; 
Product Identifier 2016-NM-209-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective November 27, 2017.

(b) Effective Date

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-
203, B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes, certificated in any 
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of reduction of the de-icing 
performance of the pitot probe over time that could remain hidden to 
the flight crew. We are issuing this AD to ensure nominal de-icing 
performance of the pitot probe in order to prevent unreliable 
airspeed indications, which could result in reduced control of the 
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Definition of Pitot Probes

    For the purpose of this AD, affected pitot probes are the First 
Officer's Pitot Probe 40DA, Captain's Pitot Probe 41DA, and Standby 
Pitot Probe 42DA.

(h) Repetitive Inspections

    At the time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, 
whichever occurs later, do a detailed inspection of the pitot probe 
heater insulation resistance on each affected pitot probe, in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service 
Bulletin A300-34-0185, Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016. Repeat 
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months.
    (1) Within 24 months since the last detailed inspection of the 
pitot probe heater insulation resistance, as specified in Airbus 
A300 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), Task 30-31-00, Insulation 
Test of Pitot Heater Resistance.
    (2) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD.

(i) Corrective Action

    If, during any detailed inspection as required by paragraph (h) 
of this AD, any pitot probe fails the test, as specified in the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-34-0185, 
Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016, before further flight, replace 
the affected pitot probe with a serviceable (new or inspected as 
required by this AD) pitot probe, in accordance with the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-34-0185, 
Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016. Replacement of pitot probes, as 
required by this paragraph, does not constitute terminating action 
for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (h) of this AD.

(j) Reporting

    At the applicable times required by paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) 
of this AD: Submit a report of the findings (both positive and 
negative) of each inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, 
as specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service 
Bulletin A300-34-0185, Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016, to Airbus 
Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus World 
(https://w3.airbus.com/).
    (1) For inspections done before the effective date of this AD: 
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) For inspections done on or after the effective date of this 
AD: Within 30 days after accomplishing each inspection required by 
paragraph (h) of this AD.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the 
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight 
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information 
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of 
the person identified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. Information 
may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any 
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or 
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight 
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD 
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be 
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International 
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation 
Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval 
(DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-
authorized signature.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a 
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a 
collection of information subject to the requirements of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information 
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number 
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for 
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5 
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, 
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All 
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments 
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing 
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. 
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance 
Officer, AES-200.
    (4) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by 
paragraph (j) of this AD: If any service information contains 
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and 
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests 
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and 
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using 
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or 
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided 
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the 
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any 
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC 
require approval of an AMOC.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information 
(MCAI) EASA AD 2016-0248, dated December 15, 2016, for related 
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket 
No. FAA-2017-0497.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina, 
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards 
Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 
425-227-2125; fax: 425-227-1149.
    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not 
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in 
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-34-0185, Revision 00, dated 
August 29, 2016.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice 
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; 
fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email: [email protected]; 
Internet: http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport 
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For

[[Page 48910]]

information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 10, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-22709 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
48906 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

Adoption of the Amendment Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),’’ paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
Variation 1.1, dated January 25, 2016. part 51.
Accordingly, under the authority (3) Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitations (2) You must use this service information
delegated to me by the Administrator, Section (ALS), Part 2, ‘‘Damage Tolerant as applicable to do the actions required by
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),’’ this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
follows: Variation 1.2, dated July 22, 2016. (i) Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitations
Section (ALS), Part 2, ‘‘Damage Tolerant
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS (h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),’’
DIRECTIVES After the maintenance or inspection Revision 01, dated August 7, 2015.
program has been revised as required by (ii) Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitations
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative Section (ALS), Part 2, ‘‘Damage Tolerant
continues to read as follows: actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),’’
used unless the actions and/or intervals are Variation 1.1, dated January 25, 2016.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. approved as an alternative method of (iii) Airbus A310 Airworthiness
§ 39.13 [Amended] compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the Limitations Section (ALS), Part 2, ‘‘Damage
procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation Items
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding this AD. (DT–ALI),’’ Variation 1.2, dated July 22,
the following new airworthiness 2016.
(i) Terminating Action for AD 2013–13–13 (3) For service information identified in
directive (AD):
Accomplishing the actions required by this this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
2017–21–08 Airbus: Amendment 39–19079; AD terminates all requirements of AD 2013– Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Docket No. FAA–2017–0628; Product 13–13 for that airplane only. Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
Identifier 2016–NM–207–AD. telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
(a) Effective Date
The following provisions also apply to this airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com.
This AD is effective November 27, 2017.
AD: (4) You may view this service information
(b) Affected ADs (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
This AD affects AD 2013–13–13, (AMOCs): The Manager, International 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
Amendment 39–17501 (79 FR 48957, August Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, information on the availability of this
19, 2014) (‘‘AD 2013–13–13’’). has the authority to approve AMOCs for this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
AD, if requested using the procedures found (5) You may view this service information
(c) Applicability in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR that is incorporated by reference at the
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A310– 39.19, send your request to your principal National Archives and Records
203, –204, –221, –222, –304, –322, –324, and inspector or local Flight Standards District Administration (NARA). For information on
–325 airplanes, certificated in any category, Office, as appropriate. If sending information the availability of this material at NARA, call
all manufacturer serial numbers. directly to the International Section, send it 202–741–6030, or go to: http://
to the attention of the person identified in www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
(d) Subject paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may locations.html.
Air Transport Association (ATA) of be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
America Code 05. REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
11, 2017.
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
(e) Reason principal inspector, or lacking a principal Jeffrey E. Duven,
This AD was prompted by a revision of inspector, the manager of the local flight Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
certain airworthiness limitation items (ALI) standards district office/certificate holding Certification Service.
documents, which require more restrictive district office. [FR Doc. 2017–22710 Filed 10–20–17; 8:45 am]
maintenance requirements and airworthiness (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
limitations. We are issuing this AD to prevent requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
fatigue cracking, damage, or corrosion in actions from a manufacturer, the action must
principal structural elements, which could be accomplished using a method approved
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
result in reduced structural integrity of the by the Manager, International Section,
airplane. Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
Federal Aviation Administration
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
(f) Compliance Airbus’s EASA Design Organization
Comply with this AD within the Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, 14 CFR Part 39
compliance times specified, unless already the approval must include the DOA- [Docket No. FAA–2017–0497; Product
done. authorized signature. Identifier 2016–NM–209–AD; Amendment
(g) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection (k) Related Information 39–19078; AD 2017–21–07]
Program (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing RIN 2120–AA64
Within 3 months after the effective date of Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
this AD, revise the maintenance or inspection 2016–0217, dated November 2, 2016, for Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
program, as applicable, to incorporate the related information. This MCAI may be Airplanes
information specified in paragraphs (g)(1), found in the AD docket on the Internet at
(g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD. The initial http://www.regulations.gov by searching for AGENCY: Federal Aviation
compliance times for doing the tasks is at the and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–0628. Administration (FAA), Department of
time specified in the service information (2) For more information about this AD, Transportation (DOT).
identified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and contact Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, ACTION: Final rule.
(g)(3) of this AD, or within 3 months after the International Section, Transport Standards
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES

effective date of this AD, whichever occurs Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
later. Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425– airworthiness directive (AD) for all
(1) Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitations 227–2125; fax 425–227–1149.
Section (ALS), Part 2, ‘‘Damage Tolerant
Airbus Model A300 series airplanes.
Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),’’ (l) Material Incorporated by Reference This AD was prompted by a report of
Revision 01, dated August 7, 2015. (1) The Director of the Federal Register reduction of the de-icing performance of
(2) Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitations approved the incorporation by reference the pitot probe over time that could
Section (ALS), Part 2, ‘‘Damage Tolerant (IBR) of the service information listed in this remain hidden to the flight crew. This

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:55 Oct 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM 23OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 48907

AD requires repetitive detailed of the de-icing performance of the pitot occurs first . . .’’ ALPA is concerned
inspections of the pitot probe heater probe over time that could remain that a possible duration of 30 months to
insulation resistance, and replacement hidden to the flight crew. The NPRM comply with the initial inspection
of the pitot probe heater if necessary. proposed to require repetitive detailed requirement of the NPRM is too long
We are issuing this AD to address the inspections of the pitot probe heater and could adversely affect safety. ALPA
unsafe condition on these products. insulation resistance, and replacement also mentioned that they preferred that
DATES: This AD is effective November of the pitot probe heater if necessary. no more than 24 months pass between
27, 2017. We are issuing this AD to ensure inspections.
The Director of the Federal Register nominal de-icing performance of the We do not agree with the commenter’s
approved the incorporation by reference pitot probe in order to prevent request to shorten the compliance time.
of a certain publication listed in this AD unreliable airspeed indications, which After considering the available
as of November 27, 2017. could result in reduced control of the information, we have determined that
ADDRESSES: For service information airplane. the compliance time, as proposed,
identified in this final rule, contact The European Aviation Safety Agency represents an appropriate interval of
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office— (EASA), which is the Technical Agent time in which the required actions can
EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, for the Member States of the European be performed in a timely manner within
Union, has issued EASA AD 2016–0248, the affected fleet, while still maintaining
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
dated December 15, 2016 (referred to an adequate level of safety. In
telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33
after this as the Mandatory Continuing developing an appropriate compliance
5 61 93 44 51; email: account.airworth-
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the time, we considered the safety
eas@airbus.com; Internet: http://
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition implications, parts availability, and
www.airbus.com. You may view this
for all Airbus Model A300 series normal maintenance schedules for
referenced service information at the
airplanes. The MCAI states: timely accomplishment of the detailed
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601
inspections. The proposed compliance
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For An operator reported a reduction of the
deicing performance of the pitot probe over time corresponds with the compliance
information on the availability of this
the time. Pitot probes are heated to prevent times specified in the MCAI.
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
ice accretion. De-icing performances of the Additionally, the affected airplanes are
It is also available on the Internet at currently in storage. To reduce the
Pitot probe might be reduced if Pitot probe
http://www.regulations.gov by searching heater degrades over time. Investigation compliance time of the proposed AD
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017– results highlighted that the magnitude of de- would necessitate (under the provisions
0497. icing performance reduction depended on of the Administrative Procedure Act)
how much the [pitot probe] heater is reissuing the notice, reopening the
Examining the AD Docket degraded. This degradation could remain
You may examine the AD docket on hidden to the crew. period for public comment, considering
Pitot probes heater degradation, if not additional comments subsequently
the Internet at http://
detected and corrected, could lead to received, and eventually issuing a final
www.regulations.gov by searching for
unreliable airspeed indications, possibly rule. That process would delay issuance
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
resulting in reduced control of the aeroplane. of the final rule. In light of this, and in
0497; or in person at the Docket To ensure nominal de-icing performances consideration of the amount of time that
Management Facility between 9 a.m. of the Pitot probe, Airbus developed an has already elapsed since issuance of
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, inspection process to check the pitot [probe] the original notice, we have determined
except Federal holidays. The AD docket heater performance, and published Service
Bulletin (SB) A300–34–0185 to provide the that further delay of this AD is not
contains this AD, the regulatory
necessary instructions to operators. appropriate. We have not changed this
evaluation, any comments received, and
For the reasons described above, this AD in this regard.
other information. The street address for
[EASA] AD requires repetitive detailed
the Docket Office (telephone: 800–647– Request To Reduce Compliance Time
inspections (DET) of the pitot [probe] heater,
5527) is Docket Management Facility, and, depending on findings, replacement for Reporting
U.S. Department of Transportation, with a serviceable one. Airbus recommended that we reduce
Docket Operations, M–30, West the compliance time for reporting from
You may examine the MCAI in the
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 30 days to 10 days (after the effective
AD docket on the Internet at http://
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., date of this AD) for inspections with
www.regulations.gov by searching for
Washington, DC 20590. findings. No further justification was
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan provided.
0497.
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, We do not agree with the commenter’s
International Section, Transport Comments request to reduce the compliance time
Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind We gave the public the opportunity to for reporting. After considering the
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; participate in developing this AD. The available information, we have
telephone: 425–227–2125; fax: 425– following presents the comments determined that the compliance time for
227–1149. received on the NPRM and the FAA’s reporting findings, as proposed,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: response to each comment. represents an appropriate interval of
time in which the required actions can
Discussion Request To Reduce the Maximum be performed in a timely manner within
We issued a notice of proposed Possible Initial Compliance Time the affected fleet, while still maintaining
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR The Air Line Pilots Association, an adequate level of safety. To reduce
part 39 by adding an AD that would International (ALPA) expressed its the reporting compliance time of this
apply to all Airbus Model A300 series partial support for the NPRM. ALPA AD would, as mentioned previouly,
airplanes. The NPRM published in the requested that we change the necessitate reissuing the notice,
Federal Register on May 30, 2017 (82 introductory text of paragraph (h) of the reopening the period for public
FR 24601) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The NPRM proposed AD from ‘‘. . . whichever comment, considering additional
was prompted by a report of reduction occurs later . . .’’ to ‘‘. . . whichever comments subsequently received, and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:55 Oct 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM 23OCR1
48908 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

eventually issuing a final rule. In light • Are consistent with the intent that pitot probe heater insulation resistance
of this, we have determined that the 30- was proposed in the NPRM for and replacement of the pitot probe
day compliance time for reporting is correcting the unsafe condition; and heater. This service information is
appropriate. We have not changed this • Do not add any additional burden reasonably available because the
AD in this regard. upon the public than was already interested parties have access to it
proposed in the NPRM. through their normal course of business
Conclusion
or by the means identified in the
We reviewed the relevant data, Related Service Information Under 1
ADDRESSES section.
considered the comments received, and CFR Part 51
determined that air safety and the Airbus has issued Airbus Service Costs of Compliance
public interest require adopting this AD Bulletin A300–34–0185, Revision 00, We estimate that this AD affects 5
as proposed except for minor editorial dated August 29, 2016. The service airplanes of U.S. registry.
changes. We have determined that these information describes procedures for We estimate the following costs to
minor changes: repetitive detailed inspections of the comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators

Repetitive inspection ..... 5 work-hours × $85 per hour = $425 per in- $0 $425 per inspection $2,125 per inspection
spection cycle. cycle. cycle.
Reporting ....................... 1 work hour × $85 per hour = $85 per inspec- $0 $85 per inspection $425 per inspection
tion cycle. cycle. cycle.

We estimate the following costs to do required based on the results of the determining the number of aircraft that
any necessary replacement that will be required inspection. We have no way of might need this replacement:

ON-CONDITION COSTS
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product

Replacement .................................... 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ........................................................ $9,015 $9,270

Paperwork Reduction Act Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more Regulatory Findings
A federal agency may not conduct or detail the scope of the Agency’s We determined that this AD will not
sponsor, and a person is not required to authority. have federalism implications under
respond to, nor shall a person be subject We are issuing this rulemaking under Executive Order 13132. This AD will
to penalty for failure to comply with a the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, not have a substantial direct effect on
collection of information subject to the Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: the States, on the relationship between
requirements of the Paperwork General requirements.’’ Under that the national government and the States,
Reduction Act unless that collection of section, Congress charges the FAA with or on the distribution of power and
information displays a current valid promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in responsibilities among the various
OMB control number. The control air commerce by prescribing regulations levels of government.
number for the collection of information for practices, methods, and procedures For the reasons discussed above, I
required by this AD is 2120–0056. The the Administrator finds necessary for certify that this AD:
paperwork cost associated with this AD safety in air commerce. This regulation 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
has been detailed in the Costs of is within the scope of that authority action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
Compliance section of this document because it addresses an unsafe condition 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
and includes time for reviewing DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
that is likely to exist or develop on
instructions, as well as completing and (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
products identified in this rulemaking
reviewing the collection of information. 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
action.
Therefore, all reporting associated with Alaska; and
this AD is mandatory. Comments This AD is issued in accordance with 4. Will not have a significant
concerning the accuracy of this burden authority delegated by the Executive economic impact, positive or negative,
and suggestions for reducing the burden Director, Aircraft Certification Service, on a substantial number of small entities
should be directed to the FAA at 800 as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. under the criteria of the Regulatory
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, In accordance with that order, issuance Flexibility Act.
DC 20591, ATTN: Information of ADs is normally a function of the
Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Compliance and Airworthiness
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES

Division, but during this transition Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
Authority for This Rulemaking
period, the Executive Director has safety, Incorporation by reference,
Title 49 of the United States Code delegated the authority to issue ADs Safety.
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue applicable to transport category
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Adoption of the Amendment
airplanes to the Director of the System
section 106, describes the authority of Oversight Division. Accordingly, under the authority
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: delegated to me by the Administrator,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:55 Oct 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM 23OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 48909

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as (i) Corrective Action the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
follows: If, during any detailed inspection as collection of information displays a current
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, any valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS pitot probe fails the test, as specified in the Control Number for this information
DIRECTIVES Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
Service Bulletin A300–34–0185, Revision 00, this collection of information is estimated to
dated August 29, 2016, before further flight, be approximately 5 minutes per response,
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 including the time for reviewing instructions,
replace the affected pitot probe with a
continues to read as follows: serviceable (new or inspected as required by completing and reviewing the collection of
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. this AD) pitot probe, in accordance with the information. All responses to this collection
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus of information are mandatory. Comments
§ 39.13 [Amended] Service Bulletin A300–34–0185, Revision 00, concerning the accuracy of this burden and
dated August 29, 2016. Replacement of pitot suggestions for reducing the burden should
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding probes, as required by this paragraph, does be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
the following new airworthiness not constitute terminating action for the Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
directive (AD): repetitive inspections required by paragraph Information Collection Clearance Officer,
(h) of this AD. AES–200.
2017–21–07 Airbus: Amendment 39–19078; (4) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
Docket No. FAA–2017–0497; Product (j) Reporting as required by paragraph (j) of this AD: If any
Identifier 2016–NM–209–AD. At the applicable times required by service information contains procedures or
(a) Effective Date paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD: Submit tests that are identified as RC, those
a report of the findings (both positive and procedures and tests must be done to comply
This AD is effective November 27, 2017. negative) of each inspection required by with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
(b) Effective Date paragraph (h) of this AD, as specified in the not identified as RC are recommended. Those
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus procedures and tests that are not identified
None.
Service Bulletin A300–34–0185, Revision 00, as RC may be deviated from using accepted
(c) Applicability dated August 29, 2016, to Airbus Service methods in accordance with the operator’s
This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B2– Bulletin Reporting Online Application on maintenance or inspection program without
1A, B2–1C, B2K–3C, B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, Airbus World (https://w3.airbus.com/). obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
and B4–203 airplanes, certificated in any (1) For inspections done before the the procedures and tests identified as RC can
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after be done and the airplane can be put back in
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.
the effective date of this AD. an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
(d) Subject (2) For inspections done on or after the changes to procedures or tests identified as
Air Transport Association (ATA) of effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after RC require approval of an AMOC.
America Code 34, Navigation. accomplishing each inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD. (l) Related Information
(e) Reason (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
This AD was prompted by a report of Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
reduction of the de-icing performance of the The following provisions also apply to this 2016–0248, dated December 15, 2016, for
pitot probe over time that could remain AD: related information. This MCAI may be
hidden to the flight crew. We are issuing this (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance found in the AD docket on the Internet at
AD to ensure nominal de-icing performance (AMOCs): The Manager, International http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
of the pitot probe in order to prevent Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–0497.
unreliable airspeed indications, which could has the authority to approve AMOCs for this (2) For more information about this AD,
result in reduced control of the airplane. AD, if requested using the procedures found contact Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR International Section, Transport Standards
(f) Compliance 39.19, send your request to your principal Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Comply with this AD within the inspector or local Flight Standards District Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone: 425–
compliance times specified, unless already Office, as appropriate. If sending information 227–2125; fax: 425–227–1149.
done. directly to the International Section, send it (3) Service information identified in this
to the attention of the person identified in AD that is not incorporated by reference is
(g) Definition of Pitot Probes paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. Information may available at the addresses specified in
For the purpose of this AD, affected pitot be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC- paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
probes are the First Officer’s Pitot Probe REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate (m) Material Incorporated by Reference
40DA, Captain’s Pitot Probe 41DA, and
Standby Pitot Probe 42DA. principal inspector, or lacking a principal (1) The Director of the Federal Register
inspector, the manager of the local flight approved the incorporation by reference
(h) Repetitive Inspections standards district office/certificate holding (IBR) of the service information listed in this
At the time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or district office. paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
(h)(2) of this AD, whichever occurs later, do (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any part 51.
a detailed inspection of the pitot probe heater requirement in this AD to obtain corrective (2) You must use this service information
insulation resistance on each affected pitot actions from a manufacturer, the action must as applicable to do the actions required by
probe, in accordance with the be accomplished using a method approved this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus by the Manager, International Section, (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–34–0185,
Service Bulletin A300–34–0185, Revision 00, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016.
dated August 29, 2016. Repeat the inspection European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or (ii) Reserved.
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 Airbus’s EASA Design Organization (3) For service information identified in
months. Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES

(1) Within 24 months since the last the approval must include the DOA- Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
detailed inspection of the pitot probe heater authorized signature. Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
insulation resistance, as specified in Airbus (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61
A300 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 93 44 51; email: account.airworth-eas@
Task 30–31–00, Insulation Test of Pitot person is not required to respond to, nor airbus.com; Internet: http://www.airbus.com.
Heater Resistance. shall a person be subject to a penalty for (4) You may view this service information
(2) Within 6 months after the effective date failure to comply with a collection of at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
of this AD. information subject to the requirements of 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:55 Oct 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM 23OCR1
Document Created: 2017-10-21 02:35:52
Document Modified: 2017-10-21 02:35:52
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This AD is effective November 27, 2017.
Contact		Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 425-227-2125; fax: 425- 227-1149.
FR Citation		82 FR 48906
RIN Number		2120-AA64
CFR Associated		Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety
82 FR 48906 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFederal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 203 (October 23, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
