82 FR 50469 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules for Excluding Days From the Exchange's ADV and Market Maker Plus Tier Calculations in the Schedule of Fees
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 209 (October 31, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 209 (October 31, 2017)
| Page Range | 50469-50472 | |
| FR Document | 2017-23580 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 50469-50472] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-23580] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-81941; File No. SR-ISE-2017-93] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules for Excluding Days From the Exchange's ADV and Market Maker Plus Tier Calculations in the Schedule of Fees October 25, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on October 11, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's provisions for excluding a day from its volume calculations for purposes of determining volume based pricing, and to adopt language that allows the Exchange to remove a day from Market Maker Plus tiers whenever a day is removed from the Exchange's volume calculations. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's provisions for excluding a day from its volume calculations for purposes of determining volume based pricing, and to adopt language that allows the Exchange to remove a day from Market Maker Plus tiers whenever a day is removed from the Exchange's volume calculations. To avoid penalizing members when aberrant low volume days result from systems or other issues at the Exchange, [[Page 50470]] or where the Exchange closes early for holiday observance, the Exchange has language in its Schedule of Fees allowing it to exclude certain days from its average daily volume (``ADV'') calculations. Currently, language in the Exchange's Schedule of Fees provides that, for purposes of determining ADV for certain incentive programs,\3\ any day that the Exchange, or complex order book, as appropriate, is not open for the entire trading day or the Exchange instructs members in writing to route their orders to other markets may be excluded from such calculation; provided that the Exchange will only remove the day for members that would have a lower ADV with the day included. The proposed rule change would: (1) Apply the rules for excluding a day to all ADV calculations rather than specified incentive programs,\4\ and (2) remove the Exchange's ability to separately exclude a day for the regular and complex order books.\5\ As proposed, with these two changes, the Exchange's rules will state that any day that the market is not open for the entire trading day or the Exchange instructs members in writing to route their orders to other markets may be excluded from the ADV calculation; provided that the Exchange will only remove the day for members that would have a lower ADV with the day included. The Exchange will inform members of any day that is to be excluded from its ADV calculations through an Options Trader Alert. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The current language in the Schedule of Fees applies to the calculation of Priority Customer Complex ADV used to determine pricing for Priority Customer complex order tiers and a discounted Market Maker taker fee in complex orders. See Schedule of Fees, II. Complex Order Fees and Rebates. It also applies to the calculation of a member's ADV in unsolicited Crossing Orders for the Member Order Routing Program. See Schedule of Fees, IV. Other Options Fees and Rebates, E. Member Order Routing Program. \4\ See id. Since the proposed language will now apply to all current and future programs administered by the Exchange that are based on ADV, the Exchange proposes to move it to the Preface of its Schedule of Fees. For example, PIM and FX Options tiered pricing, currently in the Schedule of Fees at Sections III would now be subject to the proposed rule change in the Preface as a result of this rule change. \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73601 (November 11, 2014), 79 FR 69170 (November 20, 2014) (SR-ISE-2014-51). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Currently, the Exchange's rules for removing a day from its ADV calculations apply to specific ADV calculations. In particular, the Exchange can remove a day from tier calculations for the following programs: (1) Priority Customer complex order rebates,\6\ and a Market Maker taker fee discount in complex orders that is also based on Priority Customer Complex ADV; \7\ and (2) Member Order Routing Program rebates.\8\ The Exchange now believes that it is appropriate to expand this provision to cover all ADV calculations rather than limit it to specific enumerated programs. Applying this rule to all ADV calculations will benefit members by permitting the Exchange to exclude aberrant low volume days from its ADV calculations regardless of the specific pricing program impacted. As is the case today, the Exchange will only remove the day for members that would have a lower ADV with the day included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ The Exchange provides ADV based tiered rebates to Priority Customer complex orders that trade with non-Priority Customer orders in the complex order book or trade with quotes and orders on the regular order book. See Section I and II of ISE's Schedule of Fees. \7\ The Market Maker complex order taker fee in Select Symbols fee is reduced from $0.47 per contract to $0.44 per contract for Market Makers with total affiliated Priority Customer Complex ADV of 150,000 or more contracts. See Section I of ISE's Schedule of Fees. \8\ The Member Order Routing Program is a program that provides tiered rebates to order routing firms that select the Exchange as the default routing destination for unsolicited Crossing Orders. See Section IV, E of the Schedule of Fees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Furthermore, the current rules for removing a day may be applied separately for the regular and complex order books, allowing the Exchange to remove a day based on separate impact to the regular or complex market. In connection with the changes discussed above, the Exchange also proposes to eliminate the ability to separately exclude a day for the regular and complex order books by adding the general interpretation to the Preface section so that it applies universally. Although the Exchange had previously filed rule changes that consider the regular and complex order books separately, the Exchange no longer believes that it is necessary to do so, and will therefore not exclude days where, for example, only the complex order book experiences a systems issue. With this rule change the Exchange would generally exclude days for either the simple or complex order books where any systems issue occurs. The Exchange' tiers seek to incentive market participants to transact a greater amount of liquidity on the ISE markets. The Exchange does not desire to disincentive a member simply because the day is shortened due to a holiday or because the market has experienced an unexpected closure. The proposal seeks to provide market participants with the ability to plan for and in the case of unexpected events, not be harmed by shortened or closed days. By not considering the simple and complex order books separately, the Exchange believes that market participants will be incentivized to send both simple and complex order flow without concern on days whether a market event has occurred. This rule change will simplify the operation of this rule. The Exchange notes that NASDAQ PHLX, LLC (``Phlx''), which also trades complex orders, excludes a day for the entire market rather than only for a specific segment of order flow.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See the Preface to Phlx's Pricing Schedule. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Exchange operates a Market Maker Plus program that provides tiered rebates to Market Makers \10\ in Select Symbols \11\ based on time at the national best bid or offer (``NBBO''). Specifically, a Market Maker Plus is a Market Maker who is on the NBBO a specified percentage of the time for series trading between $0.03 and $3.00 (for options whose underlying stock's previous trading day's last sale price was less than or equal to $100) and between $0.10 and $3.00 (for options whose underlying stock's previous trading day's last sale price was greater than $100) in premium in each of the front two expiration months. The specified percentage is at least 80% but lower than 85% of the time for Tier 1, at least 85% but lower than 95% of the time for Tier 2, and at least 95% of the time for Tier 3.\12\ Market Makers that qualify for Market Maker Plus receive a maker rebate for regular orders in Select Symbols of $0.15 per contract for Tier 1, $0.18 per contract for Tier 2,\13\ and $0.22 per contract for Tier 3,\14\ instead of the regular maker fee of $0.10 per contract.\15\ Market Maker Plus is designed to reward Maker Makers that make quality markets. As discussed above, however, member [[Page 50471]] participation, including Market Maker participation, is generally lower on days when the Exchange is experiencing a system or other issue that results in the market not being open for the entire trading day or the Exchange instructing members in writing to route their orders to other markets. Similar to the treatment described above for ADV calculations, the Exchange similarly believes that it is appropriate to remove these days from the Market Maker Plus calculation to avoid penalizing Market Makers on days that the Exchange is experiencing an issue. The Exchange therefore proposes to adopt language that provides that, other than days where the Exchange closes early for holiday observance, any day that the market is not open for the entire trading day or the Exchange instructs members in writing to route their orders to other markets may be excluded from the Market Maker Plus tier calculation; provided that the Exchange will only remove the day for members that would have a lower time at the NBBO for the specified series with the day included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See ISE Rule 100(a)(25). \11\ ``Select Symbols'' are options overlying all symbols listed on the Nasdaq ISE that are in the Penny Pilot Program. \12\ A Market Maker's single best and single worst quoting days each month based on the front two expiration months, on a per symbol basis, will be excluded in calculating whether a Market Maker qualifies for this rebate, if doing so will qualify a Market Maker for the rebate. \13\ This rebate is $0.16 per contract in SPY and QQQ, except when trading against complex orders that leg into the regular book. A Market Maker that achieves Tier 2 Market Maker Plus in either SPY or QQQ will receive this rebate in both SPY and QQQ. \14\ This rebate is $0.20 per contract in SPY and QQQ, except when trading against complex orders that leg into the regular book under footnote 10 above. A Market Maker that achieves Tier 3 Market Maker Plus in either SPY or QQQ will receive this rebate in both SPY and QQQ. \15\ A $0.10 per contract fee applies when trading against Priority Customer complex orders that leg into the regular order book. There will be no fee charged or rebate provided when trading against non-Priority Customer complex orders that leg into the regular order book. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule text would allow the Exchange to provide relief to Market Makers as to the Market Maker Plus tier calculation similar to that provided for ADV tiers, except that the Exchange does not proposes to use this authority to remove days from the Market Maker Plus tier calculation where the Exchange closes early for holiday observance. While Market Makers can plan for known events, such as a holiday, they are unable to plan for market events which may close the market for part of a trading day. The Exchange believes that permitting the exception for the unanticipated event therefore provides flexibility to Market Makers in anticipating where to send order flow. The Exchange desires to incentivize Market Makers to send order flow to ISE to meet their tier requirements. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\16\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\17\ in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that the proposed change to the ADV calculation is reasonable and equitable as it provides a new framework for removing days from the Exchange's volume calculations that the Exchange believes is beneficial to members. The proposed rule change would apply the rules for excluding a day to all ADV calculations rather than specified incentive programs, thereby further protecting members if the Exchange experiences a systems or other issue that results in a day being excluded from the Exchange's ADV calculations. Without this change, members would only have the day excluded for the specific ADV based pricing programs described in this filing, and would not get the benefit for other un-enumerated programs. While the Exchange had previously filed to separately consider the regular and complex books, the Exchange no longer believes that this authority is necessary. By not considering the simple and complex order books separately, the Exchange believes that market participants will be incentivized to send both simple and complex order flow without concern on days whether a market event has occurred. The Exchange believes that this change will make this rule easier to administer without having a significant impact on members. Moreover, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes preserve the Exchange's intent behind adopting volume- based pricing. Finally, the Exchange further believes that the proposed change is not unfairly discriminatory because it applies equally to all members and ADV calculations. The Exchange also believes that the proposed language for Market Maker Plus tier calculations is reasonable and equitable since it would allow the Exchange to remove a day from its Market Maker Plus tier calculations in similar circumstances as the Exchange currently removes days from its ADV calculations, and only when beneficial to the member. The Exchange believes that this proposed change is appropriate as it avoids penalizing Market Makers on days where the Exchange is experiencing a systems or other issue. Without this change, Market Makers that are wary of participation on the Exchange following an issue at the Exchange could fall into a lower Market Maker Plus tier, resulting in an effective cost increase for those members. The proposed language for removing a day from the Market Maker Plus tier calculation mirrors the language currently in place for the ADV calculation, except that the Exchange proposes that it will not remove days where the Exchange closes early for holiday observance. While Market Makers can plan for known events, such as a holiday, they are unable to plan for market events which may close the market for part of a trading day. The Exchange believes that permitting the exception for the unanticipated event therefore provides flexibility to Market Makers in anticipating where to send order flow. The Exchange desires to incentivize Market Makers to send order flow to ISE to meet their tier requirements. The Exchange believes that this is appropriate to incentivize Market Makers to continue making quality markets where the Exchange is not experiencing an issue and merely closes early for holiday observance. Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed language for the Market Maker Plus tier calculation is not unfairly discriminatory as all Market Makers have the ability to qualify for Market Maker Plus by making quality markets on the Exchange and can therefore benefit from the proposed changes. As explained above, all members also benefit from a similar provision that applies to the Exchange's ADV calculations. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change would apply the rules for excluding a day to all ADV calculations rather than specified incentive programs, thereby further protecting members if the Exchange experiences a systems or other issue that results in a day being excluded from the Exchange's ADV calculations. This rule changes does not impose an undue burden on competition because without this change, members would only have the day excluded for the specific ADV based pricing programs described in this filing, and would not get the benefit for other un-enumerated programs. The Exchange will uniformly apply the proposed language related to ADV based pricing programs. The proposal to not consider the simple and complex order books separately does not impose an undue burden on competition because the Exchange would uniformly calculate the ADV based pricing programs in a uniform manner for all market participants. The Exchange believes that this change will make this rule easier to administer without having a significant impact on members. Moreover, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes preserve the Exchange's intent behind adopting volume- based pricing. [[Page 50472]] Finally, the Exchange further believes that the proposed change is not unfairly discriminatory because it applies equally to all members and ADV calculations. The proposed rule change is designed adopt a new provision covering the Market Make Plus tier calculation. The proposed language for removing a day from the Market Maker Plus tier calculation mirrors the language currently in place for the ADV calculation, except that the Exchange proposes that it will not remove days where the Exchange closes early for holiday observance. While Market Makers can plan for known events, such as a holiday, they are unable to plan for market events which may close the market for part of a trading day. The Exchange believes that permitting the exception for the unanticipated event therefore provides flexibility to Market Makers in anticipating where to send order flow. The Exchange desires to incentivize Market Makers to send order flow to ISE to meet their tier requirements. The Exchange believes that the proposed modifications to its ADV and Market Maker Plus tier calculations are pro-competitive and will result in lower total costs to end users, a positive outcome of competitive markets. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily direct their order flow to competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee changes reflect this competitive environment. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \18\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \19\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR-ISE-2017-93 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-93. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-93 and should be submitted on or before November 21, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-23580 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2017 / Notices 50469
or structure of the Exchange have taken All submissions should refer to File (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
place. Number SR–BX–2017–046. This file notice is hereby given that on October
number should be included on the 11, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
subject line if email is used. To help the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
Statement on Burden on Competition
Commission process and review your and Exchange Commission
The Exchange does not believe that comments more efficiently, please use (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
the proposed rule change will impose only one method. The Commission will change as described in Items I and II
any burden on competition not post all comments on the Commission’s below, which Items have been prepared
necessary or appropriate in furtherance Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ by the Exchange. The Commission is
of the purposes of the Act. The name rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the publishing this notice to solicit
change will align with the parent submission, all subsequent comments on the proposed rule change
company, Nasdaq, Inc. amendments, all written statements from interested persons.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s with respect to the proposed rule I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the change that are filed with the Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Proposed Rule Change Received From Commission, and all written the Proposed Rule Change
Members, Participants, or Others communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the The Exchange proposes to amend the
No written comments were either Commission and any person, other than Exchange’s provisions for excluding a
solicited or received. those that may be withheld from the day from its volume calculations for
public in accordance with the purposes of determining volume based
III. Date of Effectiveness of the pricing, and to adopt language that
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and allows the Exchange to remove a day
Commission Action from Market Maker Plus tiers whenever
printing in the Commission’s Public
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., a day is removed from the Exchange’s
Act 9 and Rule 19b–4(f)(3) thereunder,10 Washington, DC 20549, on official volume calculations.
the Exchange has designated this The text of the proposed rule change
business days between the hours of
proposal as one that is concerned solely is available on the Exchange’s Web site
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
with the administration of the self- at www.ise.com, at the principal office
filing also will be available for
regulatory organization, and therefore of the Exchange, and at the
inspection and copying at the principal
has become effective. Commission’s Public Reference Room.
office of the Exchange. All comments
At any time within 60 days of the received will be posted without change. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
filing of the proposed rule change, the Persons submitting comments are Statement of the Purpose of, and
Commission summarily may cautioned that we do not redact or edit Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
temporarily suspend such rule change if personal identifying information from Change
it appears to the Commission that such comment submissions. You should In its filing with the Commission, the
action is necessary or appropriate in the submit only information that you wish Exchange included statements
public interest, for the protection of to make available publicly. All concerning the purpose of and basis for
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of submissions should refer to File the proposed rule change and discussed
the purposes of the Act. If the Number SR–BX–2017–046 and should any comments it received on the
Commission takes such action, the be submitted on or before November 21, proposed rule change. The text of these
Commission shall institute proceedings 2017. statements may be examined at the
to determine whether the proposed rule
For the Commission, by the Division of places specified in Item IV below. The
should be approved or disapproved.
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Exchange has prepared summaries, set
IV. Solicitation of Comments authority.11 forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
Interested persons are invited to Eduardo A. Aleman, the most significant aspects of such
submit written data, views, and Assistant Secretary. statements.
arguments concerning the foregoing, [FR Doc. 2017–23584 Filed 10–30–17; 8:45 am] A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
including whether the proposed rule BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Statement of the Purpose of, and
change is consistent with the Act. Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Comments may be submitted by any of Change
the following methods: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION 1. Purpose
Electronic Comments The purpose of the proposed rule
[Release No. 34–81941; File No. SR–ISE–
• Use the Commission’s Internet 2017–93] change is to amend the Exchange’s
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ provisions for excluding a day from its
rules/sro.shtml); or Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq volume calculations for purposes of
• Send an email to rule-comments@ ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and determining volume based pricing, and
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed to adopt language that allows the
BX–2017–046 on the subject line. Rule Change To Amend Rules for Exchange to remove a day from Market
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Excluding Days From the Exchange’s Maker Plus tiers whenever a day is
Paper Comments removed from the Exchange’s volume
ADV and Market Maker Plus Tier
• Send paper comments in triplicate Calculations in the Schedule of Fees calculations.
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities To avoid penalizing members when
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street October 25, 2017. aberrant low volume days result from
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the systems or other issues at the Exchange,
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(3). 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Oct 30, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_50678/page/1.svg)
![50472 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2017 / Notices
Finally, the Exchange further believes Necessary or appropriate in the public Number SR–ISE–2017–93 and should be
that the proposed change is not unfairly interest; (ii) for the protection of submitted on or before November 21,
discriminatory because it applies investors; or (iii) otherwise in 2017.
equally to all members and ADV furtherance of the purposes of the Act. For the Commission, by the Division of
calculations. If the Commission takes such action, the Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
The proposed rule change is designed Commission shall institute proceedings authority.20
adopt a new provision covering the to determine whether the proposed rule Eduardo A. Aleman,
Market Make Plus tier calculation. The should be approved or disapproved. Assistant Secretary.
proposed language for removing a day
from the Market Maker Plus tier IV. Solicitation of Comments [FR Doc. 2017–23580 Filed 10–30–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
calculation mirrors the language Interested persons are invited to
currently in place for the ADV submit written data, views, and
calculation, except that the Exchange arguments concerning the foregoing,
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
proposes that it will not remove days including whether the proposed rule
COMMISSION
where the Exchange closes early for change is consistent with the Act.
holiday observance. While Market Comments may be submitted by any of [Release No. 34–81947; File No. SR–
Makers can plan for known events, such the following methods: BatsBZX–2017–46]
as a holiday, they are unable to plan for Electronic Comments Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats
market events which may close the
market for part of a trading day. The • Use the Commission’s Internet BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Amendments No. 2 and No. 3, and
Exchange believes that permitting the Order Granting Accelerated Approval
exception for the unanticipated event rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@ of a Proposed Rule Change, as
therefore provides flexibility to Market Modified by Amendments No. 2 and
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Makers in anticipating where to send No. 3, To List and Trade Shares of the
ISE–2017–93 on the subject line.
order flow. The Exchange desires to Aptus Fortified Value ETF, a Series of
incentivize Market Makers to send order Paper Comments ETF Series Solutions, Under Rule
flow to ISE to meet their tier • Send paper comments in triplicate 14.11(c)
requirements. The Exchange believes to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
that the proposed modifications to its Commission, 100 F Street NE., October 25, 2017.
ADV and Market Maker Plus tier Washington, DC 20549–1090. I. Introduction
calculations are pro-competitive and All submissions should refer to File
will result in lower total costs to end On July 10, 2017, Bats BZX Exchange,
Number SR–ISE–2017–93. This file Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
users, a positive outcome of competitive number should be included on the
markets. Securities and Exchange Commission
subject line if email is used. To help the (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
The Exchange operates in a highly
Commission process and review your 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
competitive market in which market
comments more efficiently, please use of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
participants can readily direct their
only one method. The Commission will thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
order flow to competing venues. In such
post all comments on the Commission’s list and trade shares (‘‘Shares’’) of the
an environment, the Exchange must
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ Aptus Fortified Value ETF (‘‘Fund’’), a
continually review, and consider
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the series of ETF Series Solutions (‘‘Trust’’),
adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain
submission, all subsequent under Rule 14.11(c). The proposed rule
competitive with other exchanges. For
amendments, all written statements change was published for comment in
the reasons described above, the
with respect to the proposed rule the Federal Register on July 28, 2017.3
Exchange believes that the proposed fee
change that are filed with the On August 31, 2017, the Exchange filed
changes reflect this competitive
Commission, and all written Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
environment.
communications relating to the change. On September 8, 2017, pursuant
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s proposed rule change between the to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the
Statement on Comments on the Commission and any person, other than Commission designated a longer period
Proposed Rule Change Received From those that may be withheld from the within which to approve the proposed
Members, Participants, or Others public in accordance with the rule change, disapprove the proposed
No written comments were either provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be rule change, or institute proceedings to
solicited or received. available for Web site viewing and determine whether to disapprove the
printing in the Commission’s Public proposed rule change.5 On October 6,
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 2017, the Exchange filed Amendment
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Washington, DC 20549, on official No. 2 to the proposed rule change,
Commission Action business days between the hours of which replaced the proposed rule
The foregoing rule change has become 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the change, as modified by Amendment
effective pursuant to Section filing also will be available for No. 1, in its entirety.6 On October 24,
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 18 and Rule inspection and copying at the principal
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
19b–4(f)(2) 19 thereunder. At any time office of the Exchange. All comments 20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
within 60 days of the filing of the received will be posted without change. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
proposed rule change, the Commission Persons submitting comments are 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
summarily may temporarily suspend cautioned that we do not redact or edit 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81191
personal identifying information from (July 24, 2017), 82 FR 35256.
such rule change if it appears to the 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Commission that such action is: (i) comment submissions. You should 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81558,
submit only information that you wish 82 FR 43278 (September 14, 2017).
18 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). to make available publicly. All 6 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange: (1)
19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). submissions should refer to File Provided additional information regarding the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Oct 30, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_50678/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:18:50
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:18:50
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 50469 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR