82 FR 51601 - Stainless Steel Bar From India: Preliminary Determination of No Shipments and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 214 (November 7, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 214 (November 7, 2017)
| Page Range | 51601-51602 | |
| FR Document | 2017-24172 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 51601-51602] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-24172] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-533-810] Stainless Steel Bar From India: Preliminary Determination of No Shipments and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar (SSB) from India. The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2016, through January 31, 2017. This review covers two producers or exporters of the subject merchandise: Ambica Steels Limited (Ambica), and Bhansali Bright Bars Pvt. Ltd. (Bhansali). We preliminarily determine that Bhansali and Ambica had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable: November 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Kennedy, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7883. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is SSB. SSB means articles of stainless steel in straight lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or ground, having a uniform solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles, segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons, or other convex polygons. SSB includes cold-finished SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether produced from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as specified above, the term does not include stainless steel semi-finished products, cut-to-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut-to-length rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in coils, of any uniform solid cross section along their whole length, which do not conform to the definition of flat-rolled products), and angles, shapes, and sections. Imports of these products are currently classifiable under subheadings 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). Although the HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive. Background Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible Industries LLC, Electralloy, a Division of G,O, Carlson, Inc., North American Stainless, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc. (the petitioners) timely requested an administrative review of Ambica, Bhansali, and Ambica Stainless Steel Limited (now known as Aamor Inox Limited) (ASSL).\1\ As such, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of this administrative review of the antidumping duty order on SSB from India for Ambica and Bhansali.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Letter to the Department from the petitioners, ``Stainless Steel Bar from India: Petitioners' Request for 2016/17 Administrative Review,'' dated February 28, 2017. Although the petitioners stated that ``Ambica Stainless Steel Limited'' is ``now known as Aamor Inox Limited,'' the Department has not determined that Aamor Inox Limited is the successor in interest to Ambica Stainless Steel Limited. \2\ See ``Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,'' 82 FR 17188 (April 10, 2017) (Initiation Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission of Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the parties that requested a review withdraw the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation. The petitioners timely withdrew their request for review of ASSL.\3\ No other party requested a review of this producer/exporter. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is rescinding this review of the AD order on SSB from the PRC with respect to ASSL. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Letter from the petitioners, ``Stainless Steel Bar from India--Petitioners' Request to Withdraw Request for Administrative Review of Ambica Stainless Steel Limited/Aamor Inox Limited,'' dated April 24, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments We received timely certifications from Bhansali and Ambica reporting that they had no shipments of the subject merchandise to the United States during the POR and requested that the Department rescind the review with respect to it.\4\ As detailed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the Department preliminarily determines that both Bhansali and Ambica had no shipments during the POR.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Letter from Bhansali, ``Stainless Steel Bar products from India: Request for No Shipment letter during the Period of Review (POR),'' dated March 9, 2017; see also Letter from Ambica Steels Limited, ``Stainless Steel Bar--No Shipments In Period of Review (POR),'' dated May 1, 2017. \5\ For additional information and analysis, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consistent with our practice, we will complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 51306, 51306-307 (August 28, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of the preliminary results.\7\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to the issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the submission of case briefs.\8\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All submissions to the Department must be filed electronically using ACCESS, and must also be served on interested parties.\10\ An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, [[Page 51602]] ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the date that the document is due. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this notice.\11\ Requests should contain (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case and rebuttal briefs, within 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Assessment of Antidumping Duties We are rescinding this review for ASSL; in accordance with Department practice, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at the rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Upon issuance of the final results of this review, in accordance with the Department's practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which Ambica or Bhansali did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Ambica and Bhansali will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to each company in the completed segment for the most recent period for each company; (2) for other producers and exporters covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company- specific rate published for the completed segment for the most recent period of this proceeding in which that producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the completed segment for the most recent period of this proceeding for the producer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 12.45 percent, the all-others rate established in the investigation.\12\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from India, 59 FR 66915, 66921 (December 28, 1994). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: October 31, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017-24172 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Notices 51601
they also will become a matter of public ribs, grooves, or other deformations review of this producer/exporter.
record. produced during the rolling process. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR
Except as specified above, the term 351.213(d)(1), the Department is
Sheleen Dumas,
does not include stainless steel semi- rescinding this review of the AD order
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief on SSB from the PRC with respect to
finished products, cut-to-length flat-
Information Officer.
rolled products (i.e., cut-to-length rolled ASSL.
[FR Doc. 2017–24209 Filed 11–6–17; 8:45 am]
products which if less than 4.75 mm in
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P Preliminary Determination of No
thickness have a width measuring at
Shipments
least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75
mm or more in thickness having a width We received timely certifications from
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bhansali and Ambica reporting that they
which exceeds 150 mm and measures at
least twice the thickness), wire (i.e., had no shipments of the subject
International Trade Administration
cold-formed products in coils, of any merchandise to the United States during
[A–533–810] uniform solid cross section along their the POR and requested that the
whole length, which do not conform to Department rescind the review with
Stainless Steel Bar From India: the definition of flat-rolled products), respect to it.4 As detailed in the
Preliminary Determination of No and angles, shapes, and sections. Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the
Shipments and Partial Rescission of Imports of these products are Department preliminarily determines
the Antidumping Duty Administrative currently classifiable under subheadings that both Bhansali and Ambica had no
Review; 2016–2017 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00, shipments during the POR.5
7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of the Consistent with our practice, we will
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, complete the review and issue
International Trade Administration, Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).
Although the HTS subheadings are appropriate instructions to CBP based
Department of Commerce. on the final results of this review.6
provided for convenience and customs
SUMMARY: In response to requests from purposes, our written description of the
interested parties, the Department of Public Comment
scope of the Order is dispositive.
Commerce (the Department) is Interested parties may submit case
conducting an administrative review of Background briefs no later than 30 days after the
the antidumping duty order on stainless Carpenter Technology Corporation, date of publication of the preliminary
steel bar (SSB) from India. The period Crucible Industries LLC, Electralloy, a results.7 Rebuttal briefs, limited to the
of review (POR) is February 1, 2016, Division of G,O, Carlson, Inc., North issues raised in the case briefs, may be
through January 31, 2017. This review American Stainless, Universal Stainless filed no later than five days after the
covers two producers or exporters of the & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna submission of case briefs.8 Parties who
subject merchandise: Ambica Steels Slater Stainless, Inc. (the petitioners) submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
Limited (Ambica), and Bhansali Bright timely requested an administrative this proceeding are encouraged to
Bars Pvt. Ltd. (Bhansali). We review of Ambica, Bhansali, and submit with each argument: (1) A
preliminarily determine that Bhansali Ambica Stainless Steel Limited (now statement of the issue; (2) a brief
and Ambica had no shipments of known as Aamor Inox Limited) (ASSL).1 summary of the argument; and (3) a
subject merchandise during the POR. As such, the Department published in table of authorities.9
Interested parties are invited to the Federal Register a notice of All submissions to the Department
comment on these preliminary results. initiation of this administrative review must be filed electronically using
DATES: Applicable: November 7, 2017. of the antidumping duty order on SSB ACCESS, and must also be served on
from India for Ambica and Bhansali.2 interested parties.10 An electronically
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
filed document must be received
Mark Kennedy, AD/CVD Operations, Partial Rescission of Administrative successfully in its entirety by the
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, Review Department’s electronic records system,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Stainless Steel Limited/Aamor Inox Limited,’’ dated
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington Department will rescind an April 24, 2017.
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7883. administrative review, in whole or in 4 See Letter from Bhansali, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
part, if the parties that requested a products from India: Request for No Shipment letter
review withdraw the request within 90 during the Period of Review (POR),’’ dated March
Scope of the Order days of the date of publication of the 9, 2017; see also Letter from Ambica Steels Limited,
‘‘Stainless Steel Bar—No Shipments In Period of
The merchandise subject to the order notice of initiation. The petitioners Review (POR),’’ dated May 1, 2017.
is SSB. SSB means articles of stainless timely withdrew their request for review 5 For additional information and analysis, see the
steel in straight lengths that have been of ASSL.3 No other party requested a Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
6 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
either hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold- 1 See Letter to the Department from the from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping
drawn, cold-rolled or otherwise cold- petitioners, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from India: Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of
finished, or ground, having a uniform Petitioners’ Request for 2016/17 Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No
solid cross section along their whole Review,’’ dated February 28, 2017. Although the Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March
petitioners stated that ‘‘Ambica Stainless Steel 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater
length in the shape of circles, segments Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of
Limited’’ is ‘‘now known as Aamor Inox Limited,’’
of circles, ovals, rectangles (including Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
the Department has not determined that Aamor
squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons, Inox Limited is the successor in interest to Ambica Determination of No Shipments, and Partial
or other convex polygons. SSB includes Stainless Steel Limited. Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306,
51306–307 (August 28, 2014).
cold-finished SSBs that are turned or 2 See ‘‘Initiation of Antidumping and
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR
ground in straight lengths, whether Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,’’ 82
FR 17188 (April 10, 2017) (Initiation Notice). 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
produced from hot-rolled bar or from 3 See Letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Stainless Steel 8 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
straightened and cut rod or wire, and Bar from India—Petitioners’ Request to Withdraw 9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
reinforcing bars that have indentations, Request for Administrative Review of Ambica 10 See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Nov 06, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_51815/page/1.svg)
![51602 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Notices
ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on period for each company; (2) for other DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
the date that the document is due. producers and exporters covered in a
Interested parties who wish to request prior segment of the proceeding, the International Trade Administration
a hearing must submit a written request cash deposit rate will continue to be the
to the Assistant Secretary for company-specific rate published for the [A–570–928]
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. completed segment for the most recent
Department of Commerce, using period of this proceeding in which that Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS producer or exporter participated; (3) if People’s Republic of China:
system within 30 days of publication of Preliminary Results and Rescission, in
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
this notice.11 Requests should contain Part, of the Antidumping Duty
review, a prior review, or the original
(1) the party’s name, address, and Administrative Review; 2016–2017
telephone number; (2) the number of investigation, but the producer is, then
participants; and (3) a list of the issues the cash deposit rate will be the rate AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
to be discussed. Issues raised in the established for the completed segment International Trade Administration,
hearing will be limited to those raised for the most recent period of this Department of Commerce.
in the respective case briefs. proceeding for the producer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Unless the deadline is extended
rate for all other producers or exporters (the Department) is conducting an
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
administrative review of the
the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) and 19 will continue to be 12.45 percent, the
antidumping duty order on uncovered
CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department all-others rate established in the
innerspring units (innerspring units)
intends to issue the final results of this investigation.12 These cash deposit from the People’s Republic of China
administrative review, including the requirements, when imposed, shall (PRC). The period of review (POR) is
results of our analysis of the issues remain in effect until further notice. February 1, 2016, through January 31,
raised by the parties in their case and
Notification to Importers 2017. The Department preliminarily
rebuttal briefs, within 120 days after the
determines that PT Sunhere Buana
publication of these preliminary results, This notice serves as a preliminary International (PT Sunhere) failed to
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
reminder to importers of their cooperate to the best of its ability and
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
responsibility under 19 CFR is, therefore, basing its margin on facts
Assessment of Antidumping Duties 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate otherwise available with an adverse
We are rescinding this review for regarding the reimbursement of inference (AFA). The Department is also
ASSL; in accordance with Department antidumping duties prior to liquidation rescinding the administrative review
practice, we will instruct CBP to assess of the relevant entries during this with respect to Jietai Machinery Ltd.
antidumping duties at the rates equal to review period. Failure to comply with (HK) (Jietai Machinery). Interested
the cash deposit of estimated this requirement could result in the parties are invited to comment on these
antidumping duties required at the time Secretary’s presumption that preliminary results.
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse reimbursement of antidumping duties FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
for consumption, in accordance with 19 occurred and the subsequent assessment Kenneth Hawkins, AD/CVD Operations,
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). of double antidumping duties. Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
Upon issuance of the final results of International Trade Administration,
this review, in accordance with the Notification to Interested Parties Department of Commerce, 1401
Department’s practice, for entries of Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
We are issuing and publishing these
subject merchandise during the POR for DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6491.
preliminary results of administrative
which Ambica or Bhansali did not know
that the merchandise was destined for review in accordance with sections SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the United States, we will instruct CBP 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Background
to liquidate such entries at the all-others Dated: October 31, 2017.
rate if there is no rate for the Gary Taverman, On February 19, 2009, the Department
intermediate company(ies) involved in published an antidumping duty order
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
the transaction. We intend to issue on innerspring units from the PRC (the
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
instructions to CBP 15 days after the Order).1 On February 28, 2017, Leggett
performing the non-exclusive functions and
publication date of the final results of duties of the Assistant Secretary for
& Platt, Inc. (the petitioner) submitted a
this review. Enforcement and Compliance. request for the Department to conduct
[FR Doc. 2017–24172 Filed 11–6–17; 8:45 am]
an administrative review of the Order
Cash Deposit Requirements that examines Jietai Machinery and PT
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The following cash deposit Sunhere’s exports of subject
requirements will be effective for all merchandise made during the POR.2 On
shipments of the subject merchandise April 10, 2016, the Department
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, published in the Federal Register a
for consumption on or after the notice of initiation of this administrative
publication date of the final results of review of the Order concerning Jietai
this administrative review, as provided Machinery and PT Sunhere’s POR
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Ambica and 1 See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the
Bhansali will remain unchanged from People’s Republic of China: Notice of Antidumping
Duty Order, 74 FR 7661 (February 19, 2009).
the rate assigned to each company in the 2 See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the
completed segment for the most recent 12 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at
People’s Republic of China: Request for
Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from Antidumping Administrative Review, dated
11 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). India, 59 FR 66915, 66921 (December 28, 1994). February 28, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Nov 06, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_51815/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:27:30
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:27:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable: November 7, 2017. | |
| Contact | Mark Kennedy, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7883. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 51601 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR