82_FR_51876 82 FR 51662 - Sunshine Act Meetings

82 FR 51662 - Sunshine Act Meetings

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 214 (November 7, 2017)

Page Range51662-51663
FR Document2017-24260

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51662-51663]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 9, 2017.

PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit 
consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

[[Page 51663]]

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: November 2, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24260 Filed 11-3-17; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                               51662                      Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Notices

                                               mechanism of a free and open market                     19(b)(3)(A) 6 of the Act and                           available for Web site viewing and
                                               and a national market system, and, in                   subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 7                    printing in the Commission’s Public
                                               general, to protect investors and the                   thereunder, because it establishes a due,              Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
                                               public interest and is not designed to                  fee, or other charge imposed by the                    Washington, DC 20549 on official
                                               permit unfair discrimination between                    Exchange.                                              business days between the hours of
                                               customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.                   At any time within 60 days of the                   10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
                                                  The Exchange believes that it is                     filing of such proposed rule change, the               filing also will be available for
                                               reasonable to increase the annual listing               Commission summarily may                               inspection and copying at the principal
                                               fees for common stocks and warrants                     temporarily suspend such rule change if                office of the Exchange. All comments
                                               because these fees have not been                        it appears to the Commission that such                 received will be posted without change.
                                               increased since 2015. In that regard, the               action is necessary or appropriate in the              Persons submitting comments are
                                               Exchange notes that, since the fees were                public interest, for the protection of                 cautioned that we do not redact or edit
                                               last amended, the Exchange has                          investors, or otherwise in furtherance of              personal identifying information from
                                               improved and increased the services it                  the purposes of the Act. If the                        comment submissions. You should
                                               provides to listed companies. These                     Commission takes such action, the                      submit only information that you wish
                                               improvements include the continued                      Commission shall institute proceedings                 to make available publicly. All
                                               development and enhancement of an                       under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 8 of the Act to              submissions should refer to File
                                               interactive web-based platform designed                 determine whether the proposed rule                    Number SR–NYSEAMER–2017–27, and
                                               to improve communication between the                    change should be approved or                           should be submitted on or before
                                               Exchange and listed companies, the                      disapproved.                                           November 28, 2017.
                                               availability to listed companies of the                                                                          For the Commission, by the Division of
                                               Exchange’s new state-of-the-art                         IV. Solicitation of Comments
                                                                                                                                                              Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
                                               conference facilities at 11 Wall Street,                  Interested persons are invited to                    authority.9
                                               and continued development and content                   submit written data, views, and                        Eduardo A. Aleman,
                                               in an investor relations tool available to              arguments concerning the foregoing,                    Assistant Secretary.
                                               all listed companies which provides                     including whether the proposed rule                    [FR Doc. 2017–24132 Filed 11–6–17; 8:45 am]
                                               companies with information enabling                     change is consistent with the Act.
                                                                                                                                                              BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
                                               them to better understand the trading                   Comments may be submitted by any of
                                               and ownership of their securities.                      the following methods:
                                               B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                       Electronic Comments                                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
                                               Statement on Burden on Competition                                                                             COMMISSION
                                                                                                          • Use the Commission’s Internet
                                                  The Exchange does not believe that                   comment form (http://www.sec.gov/                      Sunshine Act Meetings
                                               the proposed rule change will impose                    rules/sro.shtml); or
                                               any burden on competition that is not                      • Send an email to rule-comments@                   TIME AND DATE:   2:00 p.m. on Thursday,
                                               necessary or appropriate in furtherance                 sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–                November 9, 2017.
                                               of the purposes of the Act. The                         NYSEAMER–2017–27 on the subject                        PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing
                                               proposed rule change is designed to                     line.                                                  Room 10800.
                                               ensure that the fees charged by the                     Paper Comments                                         STATUS: This meeting will be closed to
                                               Exchange accurately reflect the services                                                                       the public.
                                               provided and benefits realized by listed                   • Send paper comments in triplicate
                                                                                                                                                              MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
                                               companies. The market for listing                       to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
                                                                                                                                                              Commissioners, Counsel to the
                                               services is extremely competitive. Each                 and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
                                                                                                                                                              Commissioners, the Secretary to the
                                               listing exchange has a different fee                    NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
                                                                                                                                                              Commission, and recording secretaries
                                               schedule that applies to issuers seeking                All submissions should refer to File                   will attend the closed meeting. Certain
                                               to list securities on its exchange. Issuers             Number SR–NYSEAMER–2017–27. This                       staff members who have an interest in
                                               have the option to list their securities on             file number should be included on the                  the matters also may be present.
                                               these alternative venues based on the                   subject line if email is used. To help the                The General Counsel of the
                                               fees charged and the value provided by                  Commission process and review your                     Commission, or his designee, has
                                               each listing. Because issuers have a                    comments more efficiently, please use                  certified that, in his opinion, one or
                                               choice to list their securities on a                    only one method. The Commission will                   more of the exemptions set forth in 5
                                               different national securities exchange,                 post all comments on the Commission’s                  U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10)
                                               the Exchange does not believe that the                  Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/                 and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7),
                                               proposed fee changes impose a burden                    rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the                        (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit
                                               on competition.                                         submission, all subsequent                             consideration of the scheduled matters
                                                                                                       amendments, all written statements                     at the closed meeting.
                                               C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                       with respect to the proposed rule                         Commissioner Stein, as duty officer,
                                               Statement on Comments on the                            change that are filed with the                         voted to consider the items listed for the
                                               Proposed Rule Change Received From                      Commission, and all written                            closed meeting in closed session.
                                               Members, Participants, or Others                        communications relating to the                            The subject matters of the closed
                                                 No written comments were solicited                    proposed rule change between the                       meeting will be:
                                               or received with respect to the proposed                Commission and any person, other than                     Institution and settlement of
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                               rule change.                                            those that may be withheld from the                    injunctive actions;
                                                                                                       public in accordance with the                             Institution and settlement of
                                               III. Date of Effectiveness of the
                                                                                                       provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be                    administrative proceedings; and
                                               Proposed Rule Change and Timing for                                                                               Other matters relating to enforcement
                                               Commission Action                                         6 15                                                 proceedings.
                                                                                                              U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
                                                  The foregoing rule change is effective                 7 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
                                               upon filing pursuant to Section                           8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).                              9 17   CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).



                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:29 Nov 06, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00066   Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM     07NON1


                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Notices                                             51663

                                                 At times, changes in Commission                          any comments it received on the                         factor considerations of procyclicality
                                               priorities require alterations in the                      proposed rule change. The text of these                 into its response to emerging risks.
                                               scheduling of meeting items.                               statements may be examined at the                          Although ‘‘procyclicality’’ is not
                                               CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:                       places specified in Item IV below. ICE                  expressly defined in EMIR, ICE Clear
                                               For further information and to ascertain                   Clear Europe has prepared summaries,                    Europe considers procyclicality for
                                               what, if any, matters have been added,                     set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C)                 purposes of the proposed framework to
                                               deleted or postponed; please contact                       below, of the most significant aspects of               be the extent to which changes in
                                               Brent J. Fields from the Office of the                     such statements.                                        market conditions can have an effect on
                                               Secretary at (202) 551–5400.                                                                                       a clearing member’s ability to manage
                                                                                                          (A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the                  its liquidity to meet ICE Clear Europe’s
                                                 Dated: November 2, 2017.                                 Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the                changing margin requirements. For
                                               Brent J. Fields,                                           Proposed Rule Change                                    example, a typical initial margin model
                                               Secretary.                                                 (a) Purpose                                             would require increased margin in
                                               [FR Doc. 2017–24260 Filed 11–3–17; 11:15 am]
                                                                                                             The purpose of the Procyclicality                    stressed margin conditions, and such
                                               BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                     Framework is to establish an overall                    increases may potentially occur rapidly
                                                                                                          framework for the risk appetite, model                  and/or over-react to the change in
                                                                                                          design, monitoring and assessment and                   conditions. Such margin increases, in
                                               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                    management of procyclicality in the risk                turn, may stress a clearing member’s
                                               COMMISSION                                                 models used by ICE Clear Europe to                      ability to obtain liquidity to meet the
                                               [Release No. 34–81994; File No. SR–ICEEU–                  manage default risk. The European                       increased requirements.
                                                                                                                                                                     The framework identifies sources of
                                               2017–013]                                                  Market Infrastructure Regulation 3
                                                                                                                                                                  procyclicality, in particular in margin
                                                                                                          (‘‘EMIR’’) and related implementing
                                               Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE                                                                                 models, stress testing, and collateral
                                                                                                          standards require that a central
                                               Clear Europe Limited; Notice of Filing                                                                             haircut policies, and references existing
                                                                                                          counterparty (‘‘CCP’’) ensure that its
                                               of Proposed Rule Change, Security-                                                                                 mitigation strategies and stress testing
                                                                                                          margin framework provides, among
                                               Based Swap Submission or Advance                                                                                   arrangements used by the clearing
                                                                                                          other matters, stable and prudent
                                               Notice Relating to the ICE Clear                                                                                   house. Stress testing scenarios that are
                                                                                                          margin requirements that limit
                                               Europe Procyclicality Framework                                                                                    based on models similar to margin
                                                                                                          procyclicality to the extent that the                   models but targeting a higher
                                               November 1, 2017.                                          soundness and financial security of the                 confidence quantile may also be
                                                  Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                     central counterparty is not negatively                  procyclical due to changing market
                                               Securities Exchange Act of 1934                            affected.4 Those standards also require                 conditions, which may lead to increased
                                               (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2                    that central counterparties implement at                stress shock results and therefore in
                                               notice is hereby given that on October                     least one of several specified options for              default fund requirements. The
                                               23, 2017, ICE Clear Europe Limited                         mitigating procyclicality with respect to               framework also addresses how ICE Clear
                                               (‘‘ICE Clear Europe’’) filed with the                      margin requirements.5                                   Europe intends to address procyclicality
                                                                                                             Although ICE Clear Europe’s current                  on an ongoing basis. Under the
                                               Securities and Exchange Commission
                                                                                                          margin policies incorporate the anti-                   framework, ICE Clear Europe will assess
                                               (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
                                                                                                          procyclicality (‘‘APC’’) measures                       procyclicality by monitoring the 95th
                                               changes described in Items I, II, and III
                                                                                                          required by EMIR (and ICE Clear Europe                  percentile expected shortfall of the 5-
                                               below, which Items have been prepared
                                                                                                          does not propose to change such                         day percentage change in initial margin
                                               primarily by ICE Clear Europe. The
                                                                                                          measures at this time), it is proposing to              (or other relevant risk mitigant) over a
                                               Commission is publishing this notice to
                                                                                                          adopt the Procyclicality Framework in                   rolling 250-day window. ICE Clear
                                               solicit comments on the proposed rule
                                                                                                          order to provide a more defined                         Europe established this period, in
                                               change from interested persons.
                                                                                                          framework for considering the impact of                 consultation with Clearing Members, as
                                               I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the                      procyclicality on margining,                            an appropriate period to reflect short-
                                               Terms of Substance of the Proposed                         membership, collateral haircuts, stress                 term spikes in margin. ICE Clear Europe
                                               Rule Change                                                testing and concentration risk policies.                will also monitor the largest percentage
                                                  The principal purpose of the changes                    The framework is designed to set out (1)                changes to facilitate observation of both
                                               is to adopt a new policy framework for                     the aspects of ICE Clear Europe risk                    the maximum and a tail estimate to
                                               addressing the procyclicality of its risk                  policies relevant to procyclicality                     remove extreme outliers. A red-amber-
                                               management policies by establishing                        considerations, (2) how the clearing                    green (‘‘R–A–G’’) escalation framework
                                               such a framework that addresses the risk                   house will assess procyclicality (both as               will be used with respect to
                                               appetite, model design, monitoring and                     a qualitative and a quantitative matter)                implementing APC measures based on
                                               assessment and management of                               and (3) how the clearing house will                     certain defined thresholds for expected
                                               procyclicality in the risk models used                                                                             95th percentile expected shortfall
                                                                                                            3 Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European
                                               by ICE Clear Europe to manage default                                                                              metric, which are detailed in an
                                                                                                          Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on
                                               risk.                                                      OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade       appendix to the framework. The
                                                                                                          repositories, as well as various implementing           escalation framework specifies
                                               II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the                     regulations and technical standards.                    appropriate responses where the
                                               Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the                     4 Article 28 of Commission Delegated Regulation
                                                                                                                                                                  expected shortfall level is at an amber
                                               Proposed Rule Change                                       (EU) No 153/2013 of 19 December 2012
                                                                                                                                                                  or green level. ICE Clear Europe will
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                          supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the
                                                 In its filing with the Commission, ICE                   European Parliament and of the Council with regard      assess procyclicality both on a regular
                                               Clear Europe included statements                           to regulatory technical standards on requirements       basis in monitoring model performance
                                               concerning the purpose of and basis for                    for central counterparties.                             and making margin rate adjustments as
                                                                                                            5 The CPMI–IOSCO Principles for Financial
                                               the proposed rule change and discussed                                                                             part of risk model design.
                                                                                                          Market Infrastructures (‘‘PFMIs’’) similarly provide
                                                                                                          that a clearing house should limit procyclicality for
                                                                                                                                                                     The framework requires that the
                                                 1 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                                 margin requirements and haircuts. See Principles 5      model design process take into
                                                 2 17   CFR 240.19b–4.                                    (Collateral) and 6 (Margin).                            consideration the procyclicality


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014      17:29 Nov 06, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00067   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM   07NON1



Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:26:11
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:26:11
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
Dates2:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 9, 2017.
FR Citation82 FR 51662 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR