82 FR 51819 - Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 215 (November 8, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 215 (November 8, 2017)
| Page Range | 51819-51821 | |
| FR Document | 2017-24186 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 51819-51821] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-24186] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-201-830] Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico. The period of review (POR) is October 1, 2015, through September 30, 2016. This review covers two producers/exporters of the subject merchandise: Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Deacero) and ArcelorMittal Las Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (AMLT). We preliminarily determine that Deacero made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the POR. We also preliminarily determine that AMLT made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable: November 8, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5139. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 16, 2016, the Department initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order of wire rod from Mexico for three producer/exporters.\1\ On February 27, 2017, based on a timely withdrawal request, the Department rescinded the review for one producer/exporter for which the review was initiated.\2\ On June 30, 2017, the Department extended the time limit for the preliminary results by 60 days \3\ and on August 9, 2017, the Department extended the time limit for the preliminary results by an additional 60 days, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), to October 31, 2017.\4\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\5\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 91122 (December 16, 2016) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See letter from the petitioners, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated February 3, 2017 (Petitioners' Withdrawal Request); see also Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Notice of Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 11904 (February 27, 2017). \3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of the 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated June 30, 2017. \4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of the 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated August 9, 2017. \5\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ For the full text of the scope of the order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The product covered by the order is wire rod, in coils, of approximately round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in solid cross-sectional diameter.\7\ The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 7213.91.3000, 7213.91.3010, 7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020, 7213.91.3090, 7213.91.3091, 7213.91.3092, 7213.91.3093, 7213.91.4500, 7213.91.4510, 7213.91.4590, 7213.91.6000, 7213.91.6010, 7213.91.6090, 7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0031, 7213.99.0038, 7213.99.0090, 7227.20.0000, 7227.20.0010, 7227.20.0020, 7227.20.0030, 7227.20.0080, 7227.20.0090, 7227.20.0095, 7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6050, 7227.90.6051, 7227.90.6053, 7227.90.6058, 7227.90.6059, 7227.90.6080, and 7227.90.6085. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written product description remains dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ The Department determined that Deacero's shipments to the United States of narrow gauge wire rod (4.75 mm to 5.00 mm) constitute merchandise altered in form or appearance in such minor respects that it is subject merchandise. See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Order, 77 FR 59892 (October 1, 2012) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. This determination was upheld by the Federal Circuit; see Deacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, No. 15-1362 (Federal Circuit) (April 5, 2016) at 12. Because there were no changes to the facts which supported that decision since that determination, we continue to find Deacero's narrow gauge wire rod (4.75 mm to 5.00 mm) subject merchandise. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On January 3, 2017, we received a timely-filed submission from AMLT reporting to the Department that it made no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\8\ To confirm AMLT's no shipment claim, the Department issued a no-shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requesting that it review AMLT's no-shipment claim.\9\ CBP did not report that it had any information to contradict AMLT's claim of no shipments during the POR. Based on record evidence, we preliminarily determine that AMLT had [[Page 51820]] made no shipments during the POR. Consistent with the Department's practice, we will not rescind the review with respect to AMLT but, rather, will complete the review and issue instructions to CBP based on the final results.\10\ For additional information on our preliminary determination of no reviewable entries, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See letter from AMLT, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: AMLT No-Shipment Certification,'' dated January 3, 2017 (AMLT No-Shipment Certification). \9\ No Shipments Inquiry for Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico Produced and/or Exported by AMLT (A-201-830), message number 7009302 (January 9, 2017). \10\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 51306, 51306-07 (August 28, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and (2) of the Act. Export and constructed export price were calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of the Review The Department preliminarily determines the following weighted- average dumping margin exists for the POR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/producer dumping margins (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V.................................... 6.22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If the weighted-average dumping margin for Deacero is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importers examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\11\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent). Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review where applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ In this preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with the Department's ``automatic assessment'' practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which they did not know that their merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries not reviewed at the all-others rate of 20.11 percent \12\ if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of wire rod from Mexico entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Deacero will be equal to the dumping margins established in the final results of this review except if the ultimate rates are de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rates will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 20.11 percent, the all- others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\13\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\14\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\15\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.\16\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \16\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this notice.\17\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and [[Page 51821]] telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.\18\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \18\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case briefs, within 120 days after issuance of these preliminary results. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. This preliminary results of review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: October 31, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Methodology A. Universe of Sales B. Comparisons to Normal Value C. Product Comparisons D. Date of Sale E. Constructed Export Price F. Normal Value G. Cost of Production Analysis H. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices I. Currency Conversion VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-24186 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices 51819
Comment 89: Definition and Examples of made sales of subject merchandise at round cross section, 5.00 mm or more,
Finished Products in Scope Language less than normal value (NV) during the but less than 19.00 mm, in solid cross-
Comment 90: Exclusions Requested for POR. We also preliminarily determine sectional diameter.7 The subject
Certain Types of Lumber Harvested From that AMLT made no shipments of merchandise is currently classifiable
Western Red Cedar, Douglas Fir, and
Hemlock Trees subject merchandise during the POR. under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
Comment 91: Previous Scope Determinations We invite interested parties to comment of the United States (HTSUS)
Comment 92: Whether Certain Products Are on these preliminary results. subheadings: 7213.91.3000,
Finished Products DATES: Applicable: November 8, 2017. 7213.91.3010, 7213.91.3011,
Comment 93: Craft Kits FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020,
Comment 94: Whether Certain Scope Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, 7213.91.3090, 7213.91.3091,
Language Should Be Removed 7213.91.3092, 7213.91.3093,
Comment 95: Wood Shims
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, 7213.91.4500, 7213.91.4510,
Comment 96: Pre-Painted Wood Products
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 7213.91.4590, 7213.91.6000,
Comment 97: I-Joists
Comment 98: Miscellaneous Products Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 7213.91.6010, 7213.91.6090,
Discussed by the Government of British DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5139. 7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0031,
Columbia (GBC) and the BC Lumber SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
7213.99.0038, 7213.99.0090,
Trade Council (BCLTC) 7227.20.0000, 7227.20.0010,
Comment 99: Bed-Frame Components/ Background 7227.20.0020, 7227.20.0030,
Crating Ladder Components On December 16, 2016, the 7227.20.0080, 7227.20.0090,
Comment 100: U.S.-Origin Lumber Sent to 7227.20.0095, 7227.90.6010,
Canada for Further Processing
Department initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order of 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030,
Comment 101: Softwood Lumber Produced
wire rod from Mexico for three 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6050,
in Canada From U.S.-Origin Logs
Comment 102: Remanufactured Goods producer/exporters.1 On February 27, 7227.90.6051, 7227.90.6053,
Comment 103: Eastern White Pine 2017, based on a timely withdrawal 7227.90.6058, 7227.90.6059,
Comment 104: Whether the Department request, the Department rescinded the 7227.90.6080, and 7227.90.6085. The
Should Conduct a Pass-Through review for one producer/exporter for HTSUS subheadings are provided for
Analysis for Independent which the review was initiated.2 On convenience and customs purposes
Remanufacturers That Purchase June 30, 2017, the Department extended only; the written product description
Softwood Lumber at Arm’s Length remains dispositive.
Comment 105: Whether Countervailing
the time limit for the preliminary results
Duties Should Only Be Applicable on a by 60 days 3 and on August 9, 2017, the Preliminary Determination of No
First Mill Basis Department extended the time limit for Shipments
Comment 106: Whether the Department the preliminary results by an additional
60 days, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) On January 3, 2017, we received a
Should Exclude Softwood Lumber
Products From New Brunswick of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended timely-filed submission from AMLT
Comment 107: Whether the Department reporting to the Department that it made
(the Act), to October 31, 2017.4 For a
Should Finalize the Exclusion of no exports, sales, or entries of subject
complete description of the events that
Softwood Lumber Products From the merchandise to the United States during
followed the initiation of this review,
Atlantic Provinces the POR.8 To confirm AMLT’s no
see the Preliminary Decision
Conclusion shipment claim, the Department issued
Memorandum.5 A list of topics included
[FR Doc. 2017–24204 Filed 11–7–17; 8:45 am] a no-shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs
in the Preliminary Decision
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P and Border Protection (CBP) requesting
Memorandum is included as an
that it review AMLT’s no-shipment
Appendix to this notice.
claim.9 CBP did not report that it had
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Scope of the Order 6 any information to contradict AMLT’s
The product covered by the order is claim of no shipments during the POR.
International Trade Administration wire rod, in coils, of approximately Based on record evidence, we
[A–201–830] preliminarily determine that AMLT had
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
7 The Department determined that Deacero’s
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
91122 (December 16, 2016) (Initiation Notice). shipments to the United States of narrow gauge
Rod From Mexico: Preliminary Results 2 See letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Carbon and wire rod (4.75 mm to 5.00 mm) constitute
and Preliminary Determination of No Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: merchandise altered in form or appearance in such
Shipments; 2015–2016 minor respects that it is subject merchandise. See
Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From
dated February 3, 2017 (Petitioners’ Withdrawal
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Request); see also Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel
Mexico: Affirmative Final Determination of
International Trade Administration, Circumvention of the Antidumping Order, 77 FR
Wire Rod from Mexico: Notice of Partial Rescission
59892 (October 1, 2012) and accompanying Issues
Department of Commerce. of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
and Decision Memorandum. This determination
2015–2016, 82 FR 11904 (February 27, 2017).
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
was upheld by the Federal Circuit; see Deacero S.A.
(Department) is conducting an de C.V. v. United States, No. 15–1362 (Federal
Preliminary Results of the 2015–2016 Antidumping Circuit) (April 5, 2016) at 12. Because there were
administrative review of the Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated June 30, 2017. no changes to the facts which supported that
antidumping duty order on carbon and 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
decision since that determination, we continue to
certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) Preliminary Results of the 2015–2016 Antidumping find Deacero’s narrow gauge wire rod (4.75 mm to
Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated August 9, 5.00 mm) subject merchandise.
from Mexico. The period of review
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
2017. 8 See letter from AMLT, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
(POR) is October 1, 2015, through 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Administrative Review of Carbon and Certain Alloy
September 30, 2016. This review covers Preliminary Results of 2015–2016 Antidumping Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: AMLT No-Shipment
two producers/exporters of the subject Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Certification,’’ dated January 3, 2017 (AMLT No-
merchandise: Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico’’ (Preliminary Shipment Certification).
Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with, 9 No Shipments Inquiry for Carbon and Certain
(Deacero) and ArcelorMittal Las and hereby adopted by, this notice. Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico Produced and/
Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (AMLT). We 6 For the full text of the scope of the order, see or Exported by AMLT (A–201–830), message
preliminarily determine that Deacero the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. number 7009302 (January 9, 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Nov 07, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM 08NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_52034/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices 51821
telephone number, the number of VI. Recommendation monitoring needs. Participants for
participants, and a list of the issues to [FR Doc. 2017–24186 Filed 11–7–17; 8:45 am] SEDAR Workshops are appointed by the
be discussed. If a request for a hearing BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic, and
is made, we will inform parties of the Caribbean Fishery Management
scheduled date for the hearing which Councils and NOAA Fisheries Southeast
will be held at the U.S. Department of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Regional Office, HMS Management
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Division, and Southeast Fisheries
NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time National Oceanic and Atmospheric Science Center. Participants include
and location to be determined.18 Parties Administration data collectors and database managers;
should confirm by telephone the date, RIN 0648–XF717 stock assessment scientists, biologists,
time, and location of the hearing. and researchers; constituency
Unless the deadline is extended Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico; representatives including fishermen,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Southeast Data, Assessment, and environmentalists, and NGO’s;
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting International experts; and staff of
Department will issue the final results Councils, Commissions, and state and
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries federal agencies.
of this administrative review, including Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
the results of our analysis of the issues The items of discussion in the
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Assessment Process webinars are as
raised by the parties in their case briefs, Commerce.
within 120 days after issuance of these follows:
ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 52 in-person 1. An assessment data set and
preliminary results.
workshop for Gulf of Mexico Red associated documentation will be
Notification to Importers Snapper. developed during the workshop.
This notice also serves as a SUMMARY: The SEDAR 52 assessment of 2. Participants will evaluate proposed
preliminary reminder to importers of the Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper will data and select appropriate sources for
their responsibility under 19 CFR consist of one in-person workshop and providing information on life history
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate a series of webinars. See SUPPLEMENTARY characteristics, catch statistics, discard
regarding the reimbursement of INFORMATION. estimates, length and age composition,
antidumping duties prior to liquidation and fishery dependent and fishery
DATES: The SEDAR 52 in-person
of the relevant entries during this independent measures of stock
workshop will be held from 1 p.m. on
review period. Failure to comply with abundance.
November 29, 2017 until 12 p.m.
this requirement could result in the December 1, 2017. 3. Using datasets selected,
Department’s presumption that participants will develop population
ADDRESSES:
reimbursement of antidumping duties models to evaluate stock status, estimate
Meeting address: The SEDAR 45
occurred and the subsequent assessment population benchmarks and
Workshop will be held at the Sonesta
of doubled antidumping duties. management criteria, and project future
Coconut Grove, 2889 McFarlane Road,
conditions.
This preliminary results of review is Miami, FL 33133 phone: (305) 529–2828
4. Participants will recommend the
issued and published in accordance or 1–800–766–3782.
SEDAR address: 4055 Faber Place most appropriate methods and
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of configurations for determining stock
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Drive, Suite 201, North Charleston, SC
29405. status and estimating population
Dated: October 31, 2017. parameters.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Gary Taverman, Although non-emergency issues not
A. Neer, SEDAR Coordinator; phone:
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping contained in this agenda may come
(843) 571–4366; email: Julie.neer@
and Countervailing Duty Operations, before this group for discussion, those
safmc.net.
performing the non-exclusive functions and issues may not be the subject of formal
duties of the Assistant Secretary for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: action during this meeting. Action will
Enforcement and Compliance. The Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic, be restricted to those issues specifically
Appendix I and Caribbean Fishery Management identified in this notice and any issues
Councils, in conjunction with NOAA arising after publication of this notice
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf that require emergency action under
Decision Memorandum States Marine Fisheries Commissions section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens
I. Summary have implemented the Southeast Data, Fishery Conservation and Management
II. Background Assessment and Review (SEDAR) Act, provided the public has been
III. Preliminary Determination of No process, a multi-step method for notified of the intent to take final action
Shipments determining the status of fish stocks in to address the emergency.
IV. Scope of the Order the Southeast Region. SEDAR is a multi-
V. Discussion of the Methodology step process including: (1) Data/ Special Accommodations
A. Universe of Sales
Assessment Workshop, and (2) a series These meetings are physically
B. Comparisons to Normal Value
C. Product Comparisons
of webinars. The product of the Data/ accessible to people with disabilities.
D. Date of Sale Assessment Workshop is a report which Requests for sign language
E. Constructed Export Price compiles and evaluates potential interpretation or other auxiliary aids
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
F. Normal Value datasets and recommends which should be directed to the Council office
G. Cost of Production Analysis datasets are appropriate for assessment (see ADDRESSES) at least 10 business
H. Calculation of Normal Value Based on analyses, and describes the fisheries, days prior to each workshop.
Comparison Market Prices evaluates the status of the stock, Note: The times and sequence specified in
I. Currency Conversion estimates biological benchmarks, this agenda are subject to change.
projects future population conditions,
18 See 19 CFR 351.310. and recommends research and Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Nov 07, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM 08NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_52034/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-08 01:20:54
Document Modified: 2017-11-08 01:20:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable: November 8, 2017. | |
| Contact | Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5139. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 51819 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR