82 FR 51887 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Changes To Amend Rules 1024, Conduct of Accounts for Options Trading, and 1025, Supervision of Accounts
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 215 (November 8, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 215 (November 8, 2017)
| Page Range | 51887-51889 | |
| FR Document | 2017-24256 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 51887-51889] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-24256] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-82005; File No. SR-PHLX-2017-055] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Changes To Amend Rules 1024, Conduct of Accounts for Options Trading, and 1025, Supervision of Accounts November 2, 2017. I. Introduction On September 7, 2017, NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ proposed rule changes to amend Phlx Rules 1024 (Conduct of Accounts for Options Trading) and 1025 (Supervision of Accounts) to conform them more closely to the comparable rules of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'') and to make minor clarifications and corrections to the text. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule changes were published for comment in the Federal Register on September 22, 2017.\3\ The public comment period closed on October 13, 2017. The Commission received no comments on the proposed rule changes. This order approves the proposed rule changes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Exchange Act Release No. 81642 (Sept. 18, 2017), 82 FR 44481 (Sept. 22, 2017) (``Notice''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposed Rule Changes 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ The subsequent description of the proposed rule changes is substantially excerpted from the Exchange's description in the Notice. See Notice, 82 FR 44481-83. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rules 1024 and 1025 contain regulatory requirements generally applicable to Phlx members and member organizations that conduct a public customer options business. The Exchange is proposing changes to certain sections of those rules to clarify the language and to correct inaccuracies. The Exchange also proposes to change certain rule language to conform the rules more closely to CBOE rules dealing with the same subject matter, in order to prevent inadvertent misunderstandings of the rules' requirements. These rule changes are intended to promote more effective regulatory compliance by Exchange members and member organizations. The proposed changes are detailed below. Rule 1024(a)(i) Rule 1024(a)(i) governs registration of Options Principals.\5\ The rule currently provides that no member or member organization or individual associated with a member organization shall be approved to transact options business with the public until such persons, who are designated as Options Principals, have been approved by and registered with the Exchange. Additionally, it provides that persons engaged in the supervision of options sales practice or a person to whom the designated general partner or executive officer [[Page 51888]] (pursuant to Rule 1025) or another Registered Options Principal \6\ delegates the authority to supervise options sales practices shall be designated as Options Principals. Finally, the rule states that all members and member organizations must use Web CRD to submit Form U4, Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration or Transfer filings on behalf of their Options Principals. Members and member organizations are required under the rule to amend Form U4 filings not later than thirty (30) days after the filer knew or should have known of the facts which gave rise to the amendment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Rule 612(d). \6\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 1024(a)(i) by adopting language requiring Options Principals to electronically file a Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration or Transfer (Form U4) with Web CRD, to successfully complete an examination prescribed by the Exchange and specified in Rule 1024 for the purpose of demonstrating an adequate knowledge of the options business and of the Rules of the Exchange, and to further agree in the U4 filing to abide by the Bylaws and Rules of the Exchange and the Rules of The Options Clearing Corporation. The Exchange is proposing to remove the sentence that requires members and member organizations to amend Form U4 filings not later than thirty (30) days after the filer knew or should have known of the facts which gave rise to the amendment. However, the Exchange proposes to add language requiring members and member organizations that are required to complete Form U4 to promptly (but in any event no later than 30 days after the filer knew or should have known of the facts which gave rise to the need for the amendment) electronically file any required amendments to Form U4 with Web CRD. Additionally, new language is proposed that would require termination of employment or affiliation of any Registered Options Principal in such capacity to be promptly, but in any event no later than 30 days following the termination, electronically reported to Web CRD together with a brief statement of the reason for such termination on Form U5. The amendment would conform Rule 1024(a) more closely to CBOE Rule 9.2. The proposal would also correct a reference in the second sentence to ``options sale practice,'' substituting for that term ``options sales practices.'' Rule 1024(b)(ii) Rule 1024(b)(ii) generally provides that, in approving a customer's account for options transactions, a member or member organization shall exercise due diligence to learn the essential facts as to the customer and his investment objectives and financial situation, and shall make a record of such information. It also provides for approval and for confirmation of approval of the customer's account by a Registered Options Principal qualified individual. For purposes of clarity, the Exchange proposes to eliminate references in Rule 1024(b)(ii) to a ``specific'' or ``specified'' Registered Options Principal. It also proposes to delete the words ``qualified individual'' as they appear following references to Registered Options Principals to eliminate any ambiguity, as it is not clear what a Registered Options Principal qualified individual means if not a Registered Options Principal. Finally, the Exchange proposes to relocate the phrase ``within a reasonable period of time'' simply to conform the rule in this respect more closely to CBOE Rule 9.7. Rule 1024(c)(v) Rule 1024(c)(v) is proposed to be amended by changing an inaccurate internal cross reference, from Rule 1029(c) to Rule 1029(b). Rule 1024 Commentary .01 Section 8 The Exchange is proposing to delete the word ``other'' as unnecessary and to correct the placement of a closing parenthesis, moving it from after the word ``transactions'' to after the word ``commodities.'' Rule 1024 Commentary .03 The Exchange is proposing to add the inadvertently omitted word ``an'' before the word ``opportunity.'' Rule 1024 Commentary .06 The Exchange is proposing to reword the sentence for clarity, so that it states that individuals engaged in the supervision of options sales practices are required to be designated as Options Principals and are required to qualify as an Options Principal by passing one of the examinations referred to in the rule. The Exchange also proposes to amend the rule's reference to the Series 9/10 examination, in order to use the same name that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') uses for that examination. Rule 1024 Commentary .07 The Exchange proposes to add the inadvertently dropped word ``reviewing'' to a sentence that requires individuals who are delegated responsibility for reviewing, among other things, the acceptance of discretionary accounts, to be designated as Options Principals and pass the Series 4 examination. Rule 1025(a)(iii)A The Exchange proposes to substitute the word ``responsibility'' for the word ``responsibilities'' simply to conform the rule more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8(a)(3)(i). Rule 1025(b)(i) The Exchange proposes to make non-substantive wording changes to conform the rule language more closely to that of CBOE Rule 9.8(b)(1) by removing the unnecessary words ``above-noted,'' by replacing the words ``requirements applicable to'' with the words ``responsibility of,'' by deleting the unnecessary words ``however, the,'' and by replacing the words ``other than the principal supervisory office if such documents and information'' with the words ``off premises so long as the records.'' Rule 1025(b)(iii) The Exchange proposes to capitalize the word ``Rule'' in a reference to SEC Rule 17a-4, to conform the language more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8(b)(3). Rule 1025(b) Concluding Sentence The words ``any person'' are proposed to be substituted for the words ``a person'', and an inaccurate reference to ``this paragraph (b)(3)'' is proposed to be corrected to read ``this paragraph (b)(iii).'' Rule 1025(d) An extraneous word ``the'' is proposed to be deleted before the word ``proximity'' to conform more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8(d)(1)(i), and an inaccurate reference to Rule 1025(c) is proposed to be corrected to read Rule 1025(e). Rule 1025(e) The Exchange proposes to remove an extraneous comma to conform the rule more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8(e)(1) and to change an incorrect internal cross reference from paragraph (e)(1) to paragraph (e)(i). Rule 1025(g) Currently, Rule 1025(g) requires each member organization that conducts a non-member customer business to submit each year to the Exchange a written report on the member organization's supervision and compliance effort during the preceding year. The Exchange proposes to expand the requirement to conform it more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8(g), by [[Page 51889]] specifying that the report must also detail the adequacy of the member organization's ongoing compliance processes and procedures. The proposed amendments to Rule 1025(g) would also require the Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent) to certify that the member organization has in place processes to test the effectiveness of policies and procedures on a periodic, rather than on a regular, basis. This change would conform the Exchange's requirement more closely to the comparable CBOE Rule 9.8(g)5(i)(C) requirement. The proposal would also correct the spelling of the word ``preceding'' in Rule 1025(g)(ii), add missing semicolons to an itemized list found in Rule 1025(g)(iii), correct inaccurate internal cross references in Rules 1025(g)(v)(C) and (D), as well as correct the placement of a closing parenthesis in Rule 1025(g)(v)(C). Finally, it would replace the awkward phrase ``this requirement of this Rule'' with ``the requirements of this Rule.'' Rule 1025(h) Rule 1025(h) currently provides that each member organization shall submit the report required by Rule 1024(g) to its one or more control persons or, if the member organization has no control person, to the audit committee of its board of directors or its equivalent committee or group. The Exchange proposes to replace the inaccurate reference to Rule 1024(g) with a correct reference to Rule 1025(g). The Exchange proposes to add language to the end of the rule to establish the meaning of ``control person,'' proposed to be defined as a person who controls the member organization. The new language would define the term ``control'' as meaning the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of the member organization, unless such power is solely the result of an official position with the member organization. Finally, the new language would state that any person who owns beneficially, directly or indirectly, more than 20% of the voting power in the election of directors of the member organization, or more than 25% of the voting power in the election of directors of any other corporation which directly or through one or more affiliates owns beneficially more than 25% of the voting power in the election of directors of the member organization, shall be presumed to control the member organization. The proposed new language is based on CBOE Rules 9.8(h) and 1.1(k), which is incorporated by reference into CBOE Rule 9.8(h). Rule 1025 Commentary .02 and .03 Rule 1025 Commentary .02 is proposed to be amended by deleting the introductory phrase ``In meeting their supervisory responsibilities'' in order to conform the language more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8, Interpretations and Policies .01. The rule currently requires member organizations conducting a non-member customer business to enforce written procedures governing the conduct of options accounts. As revised, the written procedures would be required to detail the specific methods used to supervise all non-member customer accounts and all orders in such accounts. This amendment would also provide greater clarity regarding the required content of the procedures and also would conform the rule more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8, Interpretations and Policies .01. The last sentence of Commentary .02 would be revised by replacing the phrase ``short uncovered'' options positions with the phrase ``uncovered short'' options positions. Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 1025 Commentary .03 by adding the word ``shall'' to the first sentence, to conform the language more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8, Interpretations and Policies .02. IV. Discussion and Commission Findings After careful review of the proposed rule changes, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange.\7\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule changes are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,\8\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; to promote just and equitable principles of trade; to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system; and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Section 6(b)(5) also requires that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination among customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ In approving these rule changes, the Commission has considered the rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposal is designed to ``remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, by correcting various aspects of the rules and by adding additional clarity to the rules.'' \9\ The Commission notes that Phlx believes that conforming its rules regarding conduct of accounts for options trading and supervision of accounts more closely to the corresponding CBOE rules will create ``more efficient regulatory compliance by members of both exchanges due to reduction of differences in wording and consequent potential for inadvertent regulatory noncompliance.'' \10\ The Commission further notes that Phlx believes that the minor corrections and clarifications of the rules in the proposal will ``improve the accuracy of the rules'' and ``improve their readability, making them more understandable and thereby facilitating easier compliance.'' \11\ The Commission notes that the proposal received no comments from the public. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Notice, 82 FR at 44483. \10\ See id. \11\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that the proposal will promote regulatory efficiency through more precise rule text and greater harmonization of regulatory requirements across national securities exchanges, thereby reducing regulatory burdens, without undermining strong regulatory protections for investors. The Commission believes that the approach proposed by the Exchange is appropriate and designed to protect investors and the public interest, consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act. For these reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed rule changes are consistent with the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. V. Conclusion It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) \12\ of the Exchange Act that the proposal (SR-PHLX-2017-055), be and hereby is approved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\13\ Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-24256 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices 51887
does not impose an undue burden on All submissions should refer to File with the Securities and Exchange
intra-market competition. All NOM Number SR–NASDAQ–2017–116. This Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
Participants are eligible to qualify for a file number should be included on the to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
MARS Payment, provided they have subject line if email is used. To help the Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange
System Eligibility, and all NOM Commission process and review your Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
Participants may be eligible for a Penny comments more efficiently, please use proposed rule changes to amend Phlx
Pilot Options Customer and/or only one method. The Commission will Rules 1024 (Conduct of Accounts for
Professional Rebate to Add Liquidity post all comments on the Commission’s Options Trading) and 1025 (Supervision
provided they execute qualifying Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ of Accounts) to conform them more
volume. All NOM Participants are rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the closely to the comparable rules of the
eligible to qualify for the note ‘‘d’’ submission, all subsequent Chicago Board Options Exchange
incentive provided the requisite amendments, all written statements (‘‘CBOE’’) and to make minor
requirements are met. The Exchange with respect to the proposed rule clarifications and corrections to the text.
would uniformly pay the additional change that are filed with the The proposed rule changes were
note ‘‘d’’ incentive to all qualifying Commission, and all written published for comment in the Federal
NOM Participants. communications relating to the Register on September 22, 2017.3 The
proposed rule change between the public comment period closed on
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Commission and any person, other than October 13, 2017. The Commission
Statement on Comments on the those that may be withheld from the received no comments on the proposed
Proposed Rule Change Received From public in accordance with the rule changes. This order approves the
Members, Participants, or Others provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be proposed rule changes.
No written comments were either available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public II. Description of the Proposed Rule
solicited or received. Changes 4
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Washington, DC 20549, on official Rules 1024 and 1025 contain
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for business days between the hours of regulatory requirements generally
Commission Action 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the applicable to Phlx members and
The foregoing rule change has become filing also will be available for member organizations that conduct a
effective pursuant to Section inspection and copying at the principal public customer options business. The
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.16 office of the Exchange. All comments Exchange is proposing changes to
At any time within 60 days of the received will be posted without change. certain sections of those rules to clarify
filing of the proposed rule change, the Persons submitting comments are the language and to correct inaccuracies.
Commission summarily may cautioned that we do not redact or edit The Exchange also proposes to change
temporarily suspend such rule change if personal identifying information from certain rule language to conform the
it appears to the Commission that such comment submissions. You should rules more closely to CBOE rules
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in submit only information that you wish dealing with the same subject matter, in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection to make available publicly. All order to prevent inadvertent
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in submissions should refer to File misunderstandings of the rules’
Number SR–NASDAQ–2017–116 and requirements. These rule changes are
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
should be submitted on or before intended to promote more effective
If the Commission takes such action, the
November 29, 2017. regulatory compliance by Exchange
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule For the Commission, by the Division of members and member organizations.
should be approved or disapproved. Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated The proposed changes are detailed
authority.17 below.
IV. Solicitation of Comments Eduardo A. Aleman,
Rule 1024(a)(i)
Interested persons are invited to Assistant Secretary.
Rule 1024(a)(i) governs registration of
submit written data, views, and [FR Doc. 2017–24251 Filed 11–7–17; 8:45 am]
Options Principals.5 The rule currently
arguments concerning the foregoing, BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
provides that no member or member
including whether the proposed rule organization or individual associated
change is consistent with the Act. with a member organization shall be
Comments may be submitted by any of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION approved to transact options business
the following methods: with the public until such persons, who
Electronic Comments [Release No. 34–82005; File No. SR–PHLX– are designated as Options Principals,
2017–055] have been approved by and registered
• Use the Commission’s Internet with the Exchange. Additionally, it
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Order Approving provides that persons engaged in the
rules/sro.shtml); or supervision of options sales practice or
• Send an email to rule-comments@ Proposed Rule Changes To Amend
a person to whom the designated
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Rules 1024, Conduct of Accounts for
Options Trading, and 1025, general partner or executive officer
NASDAQ–2017–116 on the subject line.
Supervision of Accounts 1 15
Paper Comments U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
November 2, 2017.
• Send paper comments in triplicate 3 See Exchange Act Release No. 81642 (Sept. 18,
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities I. Introduction 2017), 82 FR 44481 (Sept. 22, 2017) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 The subsequent description of the proposed rule
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street On September 7, 2017, NASDAQ changes is substantially excerpted from the
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed Exchange’s description in the Notice. See Notice, 82
FR 44481–83.
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 5 See Rule 612(d).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Nov 07, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM 08NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_52102/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices 51889
specifying that the report must also Rule 1025 Commentary .02 and .03 correcting various aspects of the rules
detail the adequacy of the member Rule 1025 Commentary .02 is and by adding additional clarity to the
organization’s ongoing compliance proposed to be amended by deleting the rules.’’ 9 The Commission notes that
processes and procedures. The proposed introductory phrase ‘‘In meeting their Phlx believes that conforming its rules
amendments to Rule 1025(g) would also supervisory responsibilities’’ in order to regarding conduct of accounts for
require the Chief Executive Officer (or conform the language more closely to options trading and supervision of
equivalent) to certify that the member CBOE Rule 9.8, Interpretations and accounts more closely to the
organization has in place processes to Policies .01. The rule currently requires corresponding CBOE rules will create
test the effectiveness of policies and member organizations conducting a ‘‘more efficient regulatory compliance
procedures on a periodic, rather than on non-member customer business to by members of both exchanges due to
a regular, basis. This change would enforce written procedures governing reduction of differences in wording and
conform the Exchange’s requirement the conduct of options accounts. As consequent potential for inadvertent
more closely to the comparable CBOE revised, the written procedures would regulatory noncompliance.’’ 10 The
Rule 9.8(g)5(i)(C) requirement. The be required to detail the specific Commission further notes that Phlx
proposal would also correct the spelling methods used to supervise all non- believes that the minor corrections and
of the word ‘‘preceding’’ in Rule member customer accounts and all clarifications of the rules in the proposal
1025(g)(ii), add missing semicolons to orders in such accounts. This will ‘‘improve the accuracy of the rules’’
an itemized list found in Rule amendment would also provide greater and ‘‘improve their readability, making
1025(g)(iii), correct inaccurate internal clarity regarding the required content of them more understandable and thereby
cross references in Rules 1025(g)(v)(C) the procedures and also would conform facilitating easier compliance.’’ 11 The
and (D), as well as correct the placement the rule more closely to CBOE Rule 9.8, Commission notes that the proposal
of a closing parenthesis in Rule Interpretations and Policies .01. The last received no comments from the public.
1025(g)(v)(C). Finally, it would replace sentence of Commentary .02 would be The Commission believes that the
the awkward phrase ‘‘this requirement revised by replacing the phrase ‘‘short proposal will promote regulatory
of this Rule’’ with ‘‘the requirements of uncovered’’ options positions with the efficiency through more precise rule text
this Rule.’’ phrase ‘‘uncovered short’’ options and greater harmonization of regulatory
Rule 1025(h) positions. Finally, the Exchange requirements across national securities
proposes to amend Rule 1025 exchanges, thereby reducing regulatory
Rule 1025(h) currently provides that Commentary .03 by adding the word burdens, without undermining strong
each member organization shall submit ‘‘shall’’ to the first sentence, to conform regulatory protections for investors. The
the report required by Rule 1024(g) to its the language more closely to CBOE Rule Commission believes that the approach
one or more control persons or, if the 9.8, Interpretations and Policies .02. proposed by the Exchange is
member organization has no control appropriate and designed to protect
IV. Discussion and Commission
person, to the audit committee of its investors and the public interest,
Findings
board of directors or its equivalent consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
committee or group. The Exchange After careful review of the proposed Exchange Act. For these reasons, the
proposes to replace the inaccurate rule changes, the Commission finds that Commission finds that the proposed
reference to Rule 1024(g) with a correct the proposal is consistent with the rule changes are consistent with the
reference to Rule 1025(g). The Exchange requirements of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act and the rules and
proposes to add language to the end of the rules and regulations thereunder regulations thereunder.
the rule to establish the meaning of that are applicable to a national
‘‘control person,’’ proposed to be securities exchange.7 Specifically, the V. Conclusion
defined as a person who controls the Commission finds that the proposed
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
member organization. The new language rule changes are consistent with Section
Section 19(b)(2) 12 of the Exchange Act
would define the term ‘‘control’’ as 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,8 which
that the proposal (SR–PHLX–2017–055),
meaning the power to exercise a requires, among other things, that the
be and hereby is approved.
controlling influence over the rules of a national securities exchange
management or policies of the member be designed to prevent fraudulent and
organization, unless such power is manipulative acts and practices; to
solely the result of an official position promote just and equitable principles of
with the member organization. Finally, trade; to remove impediments to and
the new language would state that any perfect the mechanism of a free and
person who owns beneficially, directly open market and a national market
or indirectly, more than 20% of the system; and, in general, to protect
voting power in the election of directors investors and the public interest.
of the member organization, or more Section 6(b)(5) also requires that the For the Commission, by the Division of
than 25% of the voting power in the rules of an exchange not be designed to Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
election of directors of any other permit unfair discrimination among authority.13
corporation which directly or through customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. Eduardo A. Aleman,
one or more affiliates owns beneficially The proposal is designed to ‘‘remove Assistant Secretary.
more than 25% of the voting power in impediments to and perfect the
[FR Doc. 2017–24256 Filed 11–7–17; 8:45 am]
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
the election of directors of the member mechanism of a free and open market
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
organization, shall be presumed to and a national market system, by
control the member organization. The 9 See Notice, 82 FR at 44483.
7 In approving these rule changes, the
proposed new language is based on 10 See id.
Commission has considered the rule’s impact on
CBOE Rules 9.8(h) and 1.1(k), which is efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 11 See id.
incorporated by reference into CBOE 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Rule 9.8(h). 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Nov 07, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM 08NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_52102/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-08 01:20:22
Document Modified: 2017-11-08 01:20:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 51887 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR