82 FR 54317 - Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; American Community Survey Methods Panel Tests
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 221 (November 17, 2017)
Census Bureau
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 221 (November 17, 2017)
| Page Range | 54317-54320 | |
| FR Document | 2017-24943 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 54317-54320] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-24943] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Census Bureau Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; American Community Survey Methods Panel Tests AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, Commerce. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on or before January 16, 2018. ADDRESSES: Please direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at [email protected]). You may also submit comments, identified by Docket number USBC-2017-0006, to the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments received are part of the public record. No comments will be posted to http://www.regulations.gov for public viewing until after the comment period has closed. Comments will generally be posted without change. All Personally Identifiable Information (for example, name and address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information. You may submit attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions should be directed to Robin A. Pennington, U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census Management Division, 4600 Silver Hill Rd., Washington, DC 20233, or email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The American Community Survey (ACS) collects detailed socioeconomic data from about 3.5 million addresses in the United States and 36,000 in Puerto Rico each year. The ACS also collects detailed socioeconomic data from about 195,000 residents living in Group Quarters (GQ) facilities. Resulting tabulations from this data collection are provided on a yearly basis. The ACS allows the Census Bureau to provide timely and relevant housing and socioeconomic statistics, even for small geographies. An ongoing data collection effort with an annual sample of this magnitude requires that the ACS continue research, testing, and evaluations aimed at improving data quality, achieving survey cost efficiencies, and improving ACS questionnaire content and related data collection materials. The ACS Methods Panel is a research program designed to address and respond to survey issues and needs. From 2018 to 2021, the ACS Methods Panel may include testing methods for increasing survey efficiencies, reducing survey cost, lessening respondent burden, improving response rates, and improving data quality. At this time, plans are in place to propose several tests: Self- response mail messaging tests, a respondent burden field test, testing the use of administrative data, GQ testing, and two content tests. Since the ACS Methods Panel is designed to address emerging issues, we may conduct additional testing as needed. Any additional testing would focus on methods for reducing data collection costs, improving data quality, improving the respondent experience, revising content, or testing new questions that have an urgent need to be included on the ACS. In response to declining response rates and increasing costs, the Census Bureau plans to study methods to increase self-response, the least expensive mode of data collection. The Census Bureau currently sends up to five mailings to a sampled address to inform the occupants that their address has been selected and to encourage them to respond to the ACS. The proposed tests would include changes to messages included in the mailings to motivate the public to respond to the ACS. The proposed tests would also include modifications to the materials, including the mailing type (for example, sending letters versus postcards). Changes to the number of mailings or the timing of the mailings may be explored. The Census Bureau is also considering testing automated phone reminders. In 2014, the ACS conducted a comprehensive content review to ensure that only the information needed is requested and that the justifications provided by federal agencies for the ACS questions are current and valid (Chappell and Obenski, 2014). The Census Bureau takes very seriously respondent burden and concerns and recognizes that the content review process was only an initial step to addressing them. The Census Bureau has worked hard to identify a range of possibilities for reducing perceived respondent burden while still maintaining the irreplaceable quality and richness of ACS data (Hughes et al., 2015, Griffin and Hughes, 2013, Hughes et al., 2016, Heimel et al., 2016, Oliver et al., 2016). In a workshop held in 2016, the National Academies of Science Committee on National Statistics recommended identifying a way to quantify or measure respondent burden (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016). The Census Bureau has begun work to understand respondents' experience responding to the ACS through focus groups and cognitive testing. The next step for this work is to conduct a field test, implementing questions to measure respondent burden. The Census Bureau has made significant progress exploring the use of administrative data in surveys and censuses, potentially as a substitute for questions asked of respondents. Administrative data refer to data collected by government agencies for the purposes of administering programs or providing services. The Census Bureau has evaluated the availability [[Page 54318]] and suitability of several different data sources for use in the ACS on telephone service, the year a residence was built, condominium status, income, residence one year ago, and self-employment income. We are currently exploring administrative data use for property values, property taxes, and acreage. Additionally, we plan to evaluate the quality, coverage, and feasibility of using administrative records in lieu of enumeration for institutional GQs (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017). In addition to replacing questions on the survey, administrative data may be used to reduce burden of existing questions by allowing for modification of the questions. For example, the ACS currently asks respondents to provide their total income for the past 12 months as well as income received from various sources (for example, wages, interest, retirement income). We are currently cognitively testing modifications to the income questions, including changing the reference year from the past 12 months to the previous calendar year, as well as only asking respondents if income was received from various sources rather than the amount. As a continuation of this research, the Census Bureau proposes a field test of revised content, for income as well as other topics both for the housing unit questionnaire as well as the GQ questionnaire. Some questions may be modified while others would be removed. The ACS samples about 18,000 GQ facilities each year. A GQ is a place where people live or stay, in a group living arrangement, which is owned or managed by an entity or organization providing housing and/ or services for the residents. There are two categories of GQs: Institutional and non-institutional. Institutional GQs include places such as correctional facilities and nursing homes. Non-institutional GQs include college housing, military barracks, and residential treatment centers. Most interviews conducted in GQs are interviewer- administered (over 90 percent of interviews in institutional GQs and just under 75 percent in non-institutional GQs), but some GQ respondents self-respond using a paper questionnaire. The Census Scientific Advisory Committee Working Group on Group Quarters in the ACS recommended that the Census Bureau consider making an ``internet version of the ACS available to non-institutional GQ residents, especially in college dorms, military barracks, and group homes'' (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016). Additional support was identified for this in a workshop held in 2016 with the National Academies of Science Committee on National Statistics. The Census Bureau proposes a field test of an internet self-response GQ form for residents in non-institutional GQs. Working through the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Interagency Committee for the ACS, the Census Bureau will solicit proposals from other Federal agencies to change existing questions or add new questions to the ACS. The Census Bureau proposes testing any new or revised questions in one of two content tests. A content test using all modes of data collection will be conducted in 2021. Conducting a self-response only content test prior to 2021 allows the Census Bureau to be more agile in reacting to changes in society and legislation. The objective of both content tests is to determine the impact of changing question wording and response categories, as well as redefining underlying constructs, on the quality of the data collected. The Census Bureau proposes to evaluate changes to current questions by comparing the revised questions to the current ACS questions. For new questions, the Census Bureau proposes to compare the performance of two versions of any new questions and benchmark results to other well-known sources of such information. References Chappell, Gary and Sally Obenski. 2014. American Community Survey Fiscal Year 2014 Content Review. U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed 8/1/ 2017 at, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/operations-and-administration/2014-content-review.html. Griffin, Deborah and Todd Hughes. 2013. Effect of Changing Call Parameters in the American Community Survey's Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing Operation. ACS13-RER-17. U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed 8/1/2017 at, http://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Griffin_03.html. Heimel, Sarah, Dorothy Barth, and Megan Rabe. 2016. ``Why We Ask'' Mail Package Insert Test. ACS16-MP-07. U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed 8/1/2017 at, https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2016/acs/2016_Heimel_01.html. Hughes, Todd, Michael Beaghen, and Mark Asiala. 2015. Reducing Respondent Burden in the American Community Survey. Accessed 8/1/ 2017 at, https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/programs-surveys/acs/operations-and-administration/2015-16-survey-enhancements/Reducing_Burden_ACS_Feasibility_Assessment.pdf. Hughes, Todd, Eric Slud, Robert Ashmead, and Rachael Walsh. 2016. Results of a Field Pilot to Reduce Respondent Contact Burden in the American Community Survey's Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing Operation. ACS16-RER-07. U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed 8/1/2017 at, https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2016/acs/2016_Hughes_01.html. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Reducing Response Burden in the American Community Survey: Processing of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Accessed 8/1/2017 at, https://doi.org/10.17226/23639. Oliver, Broderick, Michael Risley, and Andrew Roberts. 2016. 2015 Summer Mandatory Messaging Test. ACS16-RER-5-R1. U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed 8/1/2017 at, https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2016/acs/2016_Oliver_01.html. U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. Agility in Action 2.0: A Snapshot of enhancements to the American Community Survey. Accessed 8/8/2017 at, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/operations-and-administration/agility-in-action/agility-in-action-2.html. II. Method of Collection Self-Response Mail Messaging Tests--We will use the same self- response modes we offer in ACS production data collection, that is, internet and a mail-back paper questionnaire. No interviewer- administered interviews are necessary for these tests. Different strategies to encourage self-response may be used, including changes to the number and timing of the mailings, the messages and materials included in each mailing, as well as automated telephone reminders. Testing is usually conducted with split-sample experiments, using current ACS production materials as the control. The Census Bureau expects to conduct up to four self-response mail messaging tests each year. Respondent Burden Field Test--The Census Bureau proposes adding several optional questions about the respondent's perception of burden at the end of the ACS interview. The questions would allow respondents the opportunity to give feedback after completing the ACS and are intended to measure the burden of the survey, including the contacts we made to reach the respondent, the time it took to complete the survey, and how difficult and sensitive it was for the respondent to answer the questions. The questions would be asked of respondents across all modes of data collection: Internet, paper questionnaires, and interviewer- administered. Testing the Use of Administrative Data in Housing Units (HUs) and GQs--We will test replacing or substituting all or parts of the ACS with administrative [[Page 54319]] data, which could make it possible to remove or modify the existing questions on the questionnaire. Respondents could be presented with a new version of the questionnaire with some questions not asked and others modified, as compared to production ACS. Evidence suggests that respondents who respond to the ACS using different modes of data collection (internet, paper questionnaire, and interviewer- administered) have different socioeconomic characteristics. Therefore, this test will include all modes of data collection. This test would include respondents in both HUs and GQs. Group Quarters Test--A sample of GQ respondents will be given the option of completing the survey via self-response using an internet instrument. We would evaluate the quality of the data received from the internet compared to traditional data collection methods for GQs (paper questionnaires and interviewer-administered) as well as assess operational issues with offering the internet option, including feedback from interviewers. Content Tests--The self-response content test will include internet and paper-questionnaires for data collection. Additionally, assistance over the phone will be offered to respondents, which can result in an interview being conducted. These interviews are considered self- response in the ACS. The test will be a split-sample experiment with some respondents assigned to receive current production ACS content and some respondents assigned to receive new and revised content. Additionally, a follow-up reinterview may be conducted with all households who responded to measure response burden as well as response bias or response variance. Comparisons will be made between the experimental treatments to determine whether the new or revised content produces better data quality and/or reduces respondent burden. The 2021 ACS Content Test will be similar to the self-response content test in that it will be a split-sample experiment with a follow-up reinterview. However, this test will include all modes of data collection (internet, mail, and interviewer-administered). III. Data OMB Control Number: 0607-0936. Form Number(s): ACS-1, ACS-1(GQ), ACS-1(PR)SP, ACS CAPI(HU) and ACS RI(HU). Type of Review: Regular submission. Affected Public: Individuals and households. Estimated Number of Respondents: Self-Response Mail Messaging Tests--We estimate that each of the self-response mail messaging tests will include 60,000 respondents. We anticipate there will be up to 14 tests across the 3-year period. Respondent Burden Field Test--100,000. Testing the Use of Administrative Data--100,000. Self-Response Content Test--100,000 respondents plus 63,000 respondents in the follow-up reinterview. 2021 ACS Content Test--100,000 respondents plus 83,000 respondents in the follow-up reinterview. Estimated Time per Response: Self-Response Mail Messaging Tests--40 minutes. Respondent Burden Field Test--50 minutes (10 minutes for the optional follow-up questions). Testing the Use of Administrative Data in HUs and GQs--40 minutes. Group Quarters Test--40 minutes (includes both the interview with the facility manager and the interview itself). Self-Response Content Test--40 minutes for the initial interview plus 20 minutes for the follow-up reinterview. 2021 ACS Content Test--40 minutes for the initial interview plus 20 minutes for the follow-up reinterview. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 297,445. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated number of Estimated time per Test respondents response (in minutes) Total burden hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2018 Self-Response Mail Messaging Test A--60,000........... Test A--40.............. Test A--40,000. Tests. Test B--60,000........... Test B--40.............. Test B--40,000. 2019 Self-Response Mail Messaging Test A--60,000........... Test A--40.............. Test A--40,000. Tests. Test B--60,000........... Test B--40.............. Test B--40,000. Test C--60,000........... Test C--40.............. Test C--40,000. Test D--60,000........... Test D--40.............. Test D--40,000. 2020 Self-Response Mail Messaging Test A--60,000........... Test A--40.............. Test A--40,000. Tests. Test B--60,000........... Test B--40.............. Test B--40,000. Test C--60,000........... Test C--40.............. Test C--40,000. Test D--60,000........... Test D--40.............. Test D--40,000. 2021 Self-Response Mail Messaging Test A--60,000........... Test A--40.............. Test A--40,000. Tests. Test B--60,000........... Test B--40.............. Test B--40,000. Test C--60,000........... Test C--40.............. Test C--40,000. Test D--60,000........... Test D--40.............. Test D--40,000. Respondent Burden Field Test..... 100,000.................. 50...................... 83,334. Testing the Use of Administrative 100,000.................. 40...................... 66,667. Data in HUs and GQs. Group Quarters Test.............. 500...................... 40...................... 334. Self-Response Content Test....... Initial Interview-- Initial Interview--40... Initial Interview-- 100,000. 66,667. Follow-up Reinterview-- Follow-up Reinterview-- Follow-up Reinterview-- 63,000. 20. 21,000. 2021 ACS Content Test............ Initial Interview-- Initial Interview--40... Initial Interview-- 100,000. 66,667. Follow-up Reinterview-- Follow-up Reinterview-- Follow-up Reinterview-- 83,000. 20. 27,667. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total........................ 1,386,500................ ........................ 892,336 (over 3 years). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: Except for their time, there is no cost to respondents. Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory. Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. Sections 141 and 193. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including [[Page 54320]] whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Sheleen Dumas, Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2017-24943 Filed 11-16-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices 54317
written statements with the Board’s staff public viewing until after the comment respondent experience, revising content,
before or after the meeting. Written period has closed. Comments will or testing new questions that have an
comments and time requests for oral generally be posted without change. All urgent need to be included on the ACS.
comments must be sent to Scott Personally Identifiable Information (for In response to declining response
Jacobson, Black Hills National Forest example, name and address) voluntarily rates and increasing costs, the Census
Supervisor’s Office, 1019 North Fifth submitted by the commenter may be Bureau plans to study methods to
Street, Custer, South Dakota 57730; by publicly accessible. Do not submit increase self-response, the least
email to sjjacobson@fs.fed.us, or via Confidential Business Information or expensive mode of data collection. The
facsimile to 605–673–9208. otherwise sensitive or protected Census Bureau currently sends up to
Meeting Accommodations: If you are information. You may submit five mailings to a sampled address to
a person requiring reasonable attachments to electronic comments in inform the occupants that their address
accommodation, please make requests Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or has been selected and to encourage
in advance for sign language Adobe PDF file formats only. them to respond to the ACS. The
interpreting, assistive listening devices, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
proposed tests would include changes
or other reasonable accommodation for Requests for additional information or to messages included in the mailings to
access to the facility or proceedings by copies of the information collection motivate the public to respond to the
contacting the person listed in the instrument(s) and instructions should ACS. The proposed tests would also
section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION be directed to Robin A. Pennington, U.S. include modifications to the materials,
CONTACT. All reasonable Census Bureau, Decennial Census including the mailing type (for example,
accommodation requests are managed Management Division, 4600 Silver Hill sending letters versus postcards).
on a case by case basis. Changes to the number of mailings or
Rd., Washington, DC 20233, or email at
the timing of the mailings may be
Dated: October 24, 2017. Robin.A.Pennington@census.gov.
explored. The Census Bureau is also
Chris French, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: considering testing automated phone
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest I. Abstract reminders.
System. In 2014, the ACS conducted a
[FR Doc. 2017–24914 Filed 11–16–17; 8:45 am] The American Community Survey comprehensive content review to ensure
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
(ACS) collects detailed socioeconomic that only the information needed is
data from about 3.5 million addresses in requested and that the justifications
the United States and 36,000 in Puerto provided by federal agencies for the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rico each year. The ACS also collects ACS questions are current and valid
detailed socioeconomic data from about (Chappell and Obenski, 2014). The
Census Bureau 195,000 residents living in Group Census Bureau takes very seriously
Quarters (GQ) facilities. Resulting respondent burden and concerns and
Proposed Information Collection; tabulations from this data collection are recognizes that the content review
Comment Request; American provided on a yearly basis. The ACS process was only an initial step to
Community Survey Methods Panel allows the Census Bureau to provide addressing them. The Census Bureau
Tests timely and relevant housing and has worked hard to identify a range of
socioeconomic statistics, even for small possibilities for reducing perceived
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, geographies.
Commerce. respondent burden while still
An ongoing data collection effort with maintaining the irreplaceable quality
ACTION: Notice. an annual sample of this magnitude and richness of ACS data (Hughes et al.,
requires that the ACS continue research, 2015, Griffin and Hughes, 2013, Hughes
SUMMARY: The Department of testing, and evaluations aimed at
Commerce, as part of its continuing et al., 2016, Heimel et al., 2016, Oliver
improving data quality, achieving et al., 2016). In a workshop held in
effort to reduce paperwork and survey cost efficiencies, and improving
respondent burden, invites the general 2016, the National Academies of
ACS questionnaire content and related Science Committee on National
public and other Federal agencies to data collection materials. The ACS
take this opportunity to comment on Statistics recommended identifying a
Methods Panel is a research program way to quantify or measure respondent
proposed and/or continuing information designed to address and respond to
collections, as required by the burden (National Academies of
survey issues and needs. From 2018 to Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 2021, the ACS Methods Panel may 2016). The Census Bureau has begun
DATES: To ensure consideration, written include testing methods for increasing work to understand respondents’
comments must be submitted on or survey efficiencies, reducing survey experience responding to the ACS
before January 16, 2018. cost, lessening respondent burden, through focus groups and cognitive
ADDRESSES: Please direct all written improving response rates, and testing. The next step for this work is to
comments to Jennifer Jessup, improving data quality. conduct a field test, implementing
Departmental Paperwork Clearance At this time, plans are in place to questions to measure respondent
Officer, Department of Commerce, Room propose several tests: Self-response mail burden.
6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue messaging tests, a respondent burden The Census Bureau has made
NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the field test, testing the use of significant progress exploring the use of
Internet at PRAcomments@doc.gov). administrative data, GQ testing, and two administrative data in surveys and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
You may also submit comments, content tests. Since the ACS Methods censuses, potentially as a substitute for
identified by Docket number USBC– Panel is designed to address emerging questions asked of respondents.
2017–0006, to the Federal e-Rulemaking issues, we may conduct additional Administrative data refer to data
Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. All testing as needed. Any additional collected by government agencies for
comments received are part of the testing would focus on methods for the purposes of administering programs
public record. No comments will be reducing data collection costs, or providing services. The Census
posted to http://www.regulations.gov for improving data quality, improving the Bureau has evaluated the availability
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Nov 16, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_54538/page/1.svg)
![54320 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices
whether the information shall have straightening styling balm (duty-free). Background
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Estee Lauder would be able to avoid On July 3, 2017, the Department
agency’s estimate of the burden duty on foreign-status components published in the Federal Register a
(including hours and cost) of the which become scrap/waste. Customs notice of opportunity to request an
proposed collection of information; (c) duties also could possibly be deferred or administrative review of the CVD order
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and reduced on foreign-status production on steel nails from Vietnam for the
clarity of the information to be equipment. period January 1, 2016, to December 31,
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the Public comment is invited from 2016.1 On July 31, 2017, the Department
burden of the collection of information interested parties. Submissions shall be received a timely request, in accordance
on respondents, including through the addressed to the Board’s Executive with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
use of automated collection techniques Secretary at the address below. The 1930, as amended (the Act), from Mid
or other forms of information closing period for their receipt is Continent Steel & Wire Inc. (the
technology. December 27, 2017. petitioner) to conduct an administrative
Comments submitted in response to A copy of the notification will be review of this CVD order with respect to
this notice will be summarized and/or available for public inspection at the 14 companies.2 Based upon this request,
included in the request for OMB Office of the Executive Secretary, on September 13, 2017, in accordance
approval of this information collection; Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room with section 751(a) of the Act, the
they also will become a matter of public 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, Department published in the Federal
record. 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Register a notice of initiation of
Sheleen Dumas, Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the administrative review for this CVD
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s order.3 On September 28, 2017, the
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief
Information Officer. Web site, which is accessible via petitioner timely withdrew its request
www.trade.gov/ftz. for an administrative review for each of
[FR Doc. 2017–24943 Filed 11–16–17; 8:45 am]
For further information, contact the 14 companies.4
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
Juanita Chen at Juanita.Chen@trade.gov Rescission of Review
or (202) 482–1378. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Dated: November 13, 2017. Secretary will rescind an administrative
Andrew McGilvray, review, in whole or in part, if a party
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
Executive Secretary. who requested the review withdraws
[B–69–2017] [FR Doc. 2017–24972 Filed 11–16–17; 8:45 am] the request within 90 days of the date
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
of publication of the notice of initiation
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 52—Suffolk of the requested review. As noted above,
County, New York; Notification of the petitioner withdrew its request for
Proposed Production Activity; Estee review by the 90-day deadline. No other
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Lauder Inc., (Hair Straightening Styling party requested an administrative
Balm), Melville, New York International Trade Administration review. Accordingly, we are rescinding
Estee Lauder Inc. (Estee Lauder) the administrative review of the CVD
submitted a notification of proposed [C–552–819] order on steel nails from Vietnam
production activity to the FTZ Board for covering the period January 1, 2016, to
its facilities in Melville, New York Certain Steel Nails From the Socialist December 31, 2016.
within FTZ 52. The notification Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Assessment
conforming to the requirements of the Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 2016 The Department will instruct U.S.
regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
400.22) was received on November 2, assess CVDs on all appropriate entries at
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
2017. a rate equal to the cash deposit of
International Trade Administration,
Estee Lauder already has authority to estimated CVDs required at the time of
Department of Commerce.
manufacture and distribute skin care, entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
fragrance, and cosmetic products within SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce for consumption, during the period
FTZ 52. The current request would add (the Department) is rescinding the January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016,
a finished product (hair straightening administrative review of the in accordance with 19 CFR
styling balm) to the scope of authority. countervailing duty (CVD) order on 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), certain steel nails (steel nails) from the intends to issue appropriate assessment
additional FTZ authority would be Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) instructions directly to CBP 15 days
limited to the finished product for the period January 1, 2016, to after publication of this notice in the
described in the submitted notification December 31, 2016, based on the timely Federal Register.
(as described below) and subsequently withdrawal of the request for review.
authorized by the FTZ Board. DATES: Applicable November 17, 2017. 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Production under FTZ procedures Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
could exempt Estee Lauder from FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 30833
customs duty payments on the foreign- Yasmin Bordas, AD/CVD Operations, (July 3, 2017).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
2 See Letter from the petitioner re: Certain Steel
status materials/components used in Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
Nails from Vietnam: Request for Administrative
export production. On its domestic International Trade Administration, Reviews, dated July 31, 2017.
sales, for foreign-status materials/ U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
components in the existing scope of Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
authority, Estee Lauder would be able to DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3813 42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
4 See Letter from the petitioner re: Certain Steel
choose the duty rate during customs and (202) 482–7438, respectively.
Nails from Vietnam: Withdrawal of Request for
entry procedures that applies to hair SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Administrative Reviews, dated September 28, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Nov 16, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_54538/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-17 05:14:36
Document Modified: 2017-11-17 05:14:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Dates | To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on or before January 16, 2018. | |
| Contact | Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions should be directed to Robin A. Pennington, U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census Management Division, 4600 Silver Hill Rd., Washington, DC 20233, or email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 54317 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR