82 FR 54405 - Issuance of Import Permits for Zimbabwe Elephant Trophies Taken on or After January 21, 2016, and on or Before December 31, 2018
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 221 (November 17, 2017)
Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 221 (November 17, 2017)
| Page Range | 54405-54408 | |
| FR Document | 2017-24974 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 54405-54408] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-24974] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS-HQ-IA-2017-N116; FXIA16710900000-XXX-FF09A30000] Issuance of Import Permits for Zimbabwe Elephant Trophies Taken on or After January 21, 2016, and on or Before December 31, 2018 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has made a finding that the killing of African elephant trophy animals in Zimbabwe, on or after January 21, 2016, and on or before December 31, 2018, will enhance the survival of the African elephant. Applications to import trophies hunted during this time period will be considered to have met the enhancement requirement, unless we issue a new finding based on available information. The Service may replace this finding, without any notification in the Federal Register, at any time that this finding no longer reflects the available information consistent with the regulatory requirements. In reviewing each application received for import of such specimens, the Service evaluates the information provided in the application, as well as other information available to the Service on the status of the elephant population and the management program for elephants in the country to ensure that the program is promoting the conservation of the species. Each application to import sport-hunted elephant trophies must also meet all other applicable permitting requirements before it may be authorized. This determination does not affect previous determinations by the Service regarding trophy animals taken before January 21, 2016. DATES: This finding is made November 17, 2017. ADDRESSES: Timothy J. Van Norman, Chief, Branch of Permits, Division of Management Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: IA, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803; fax (703) 358-2280; or email [email protected]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy J. Van Norman, (703) 358-2104 (telephone); (703) 358-2280 (fax); or [email protected] (email). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The African elephant (Loxodonta africana) is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA or Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (50 CFR 17.11(h)). It is also regulated under the provisions of section 4(d) of the Act (known as a ``section 4(d) rule'') with a rule found at 50 CFR 17.40(e). The section 4(d) rule includes specific requirements for the import of sport-hunted trophies. Under Sec. 17.40(e)(6)(i)(B), in order for the Service to authorize the import of a sport-hunted elephant trophy, the Service must find that the killing of the trophy animal will enhance the survival of the species in the wild (known as an ``enhancement finding''). The Zimbabwe elephant population, along with elephant populations in Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa, are also included in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) for the exclusive purpose of allowing certain trade subject to annotation, including trade in hunting trophies for noncommercial purposes. All specimens not included in the annotation are deemed Appendix I specimens, and trade in them is regulated accordingly. On August 22, 1997, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) published a proposed rule announcing decisions by the Conference of the Parties to CITES and seeking comment on whether the United States should enter a reservation for any of the species that had been listed on CITES Appendices I and II (62 FR 44627). We discussed how the populations of African elephants in Zimbabwe, Botswana, and Namibia had been down-listed from CITES Appendix I to Appendix II and noted that, because African elephants are listed under the ESA as threatened, the African elephant section 4(d) rule found at 50 CFR 17.40(e) would continue to apply. This rule required that we find that the killing of the animal whose trophy was intended for import would enhance the survival of the species before a sport-hunted trophy could be imported. We also stated that, in making the required enhancement finding for the import of sport-hunted trophies, the Service must review the status of the elephant population and the total management program for the elephant in each country to ensure the program is promoting the conservation of the species. The preamble to the 1997 proposed rule noted that positive enhancement findings for the countries of Zimbabwe, Botswana, and Namibia had been made and would remain in effect until the Service found that the conditions of the section 4(d) rule are no longer met and published notice of a changed finding in the Federal Register. On May 18, 2001, we published a final rule again announcing decisions made at a meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, including the decision to down-list the South African population of African elephants from CITES Appendix I to Appendix II (66 FR 27601). We again discussed the import requirements for African elephant sport-hunted trophies and stated that the enhancement finding for South African elephants would remain in effect until the Service found that conditions of the rule are no longer met and published notice of a changed finding in the Federal Register. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, in Safari Club International, et al. v. Jewell, et al., 213 F. Supp. 3d 48 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 2016), has held that the Service created a binding duty on itself when it stated in the preamble of the 1997 proposed rule that it would publish notice in the Federal Register before making a change in its 1997 enhancement finding for Zimbabwe, and that the Service then violated this commitment when it published the Federal Register notice on May 12, 2014, several weeks after making an interim negative enhancement finding for Zimbabwe on April 4, 2014. As remedy, the Court ordered that the effective date of the 2014 enhancement finding is the date of the Federal Register notice, May 12, 2014, meaning that trophies taken on or before May 11, 2014 were allowed to meet the enhancement requirement. We did not intend to create a legal duty to publish changed enhancement findings through these Federal Register preamble statements. On June 6, 2016, the Service amended the African elephant section 4(d) rule (81 FR 36388). With this amendment, ESA permits are required to import all African elephant sport-hunted trophies, including those from the CITES Appendix II populations of Zimbabwe, Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa. Because all imports will be accompanied by a threatened species permit evaluated through the ESA permit application process found at 50 CFR 17.32(a), we will no longer publish [[Page 54406]] notice of changed enhancement findings for African elephant sport- hunted trophies in the Federal Register. In the future, when there are subsequent changes to the determination, the individual applicant will be notified regarding whether his or her permit application was granted or denied, including a brief statement of the grounds for any denial. We may also post information on the import of African elephant hunting trophies on the Service's Web page (www.fws.gov/international), as appropriate and consistent with applicable laws and regulations. Import Suspension On April 4, 2014, the Service announced an interim suspension of imports of sport-hunted elephant trophies taken in Zimbabwe during the 2014 season. We revised this finding on April 17, 2014, primarily to clarify that the suspension applied only to elephants hunted on or after April 4, 2014. This determination was announced in the Federal Register on May 12, 2014 (79 FR 26986). Our decision to establish an interim suspension of imports of elephant trophies from Zimbabwe was due to having insufficient information on the status of elephants in Zimbabwe and on Zimbabwe's current elephant management program to make an enhancement finding. On July 17, 2014, the Service found that the import of elephant trophies taken in Zimbabwe in 2014 on or after April 4, 2014, would be suspended. We revised this finding on July 22, 2014, to make non-substantive corrections and announced this determination in the Federal Register on July 31, 2014 (79 FR 44459). The July 17, 2014, decision to uphold the April 4, 2014, suspension was due to the Service being unable to make an enhancement finding even after receiving additional materials from the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (ZPWMA) and others. On March 26, 2015, the Service made another determination to continue the suspension (80 FR 42524, July 17, 2015). This decision was again due to the Service being unable to make an enhancement finding even after receiving additional materials from ZPWMA and others. The suspension that resulted from the negative enhancement findings did not prohibit U.S. hunters from traveling to Zimbabwe and participating in an elephant hunt. The Act does not prohibit take (e.g., hunting) within a foreign country; it prohibits import of trophies taken during such hunts without required authorization under the Act. Following the Service's March 26, 2015, finding, the Service sent a letter on May 12, 2015, to the Honorable Saviour Kasukuwere, (formerly) Zimbabwe's Minister of Environment, Water and Climate, outlining the concerns the Service still had regarding elephant trophy imports from Zimbabwe. The letter identified six areas of concern: the lack of a current management plan; the current population status of elephants in Zimbabwe; poaching levels and prevention; regulations and enforcement concerns; the sustainable utilization of elephants in Zimbabwe; and the utilization of hunting revenues. On July 20, 2015, ZPWMA responded to each of the questions outlined in the Service's letter and included a draft version of the Action Plan for Elephant Conservation and Management in Zimbabwe (2015-2020). In January 2016, the Service received the final version of the action plan, the Zimbabwe National Elephant Management Plan (2015-2020), that had been approved and signed by the (then) Director-General of ZPWMA Edson Chidziya, on January 20, 2016, and the Honorable Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri, Minister of Environment, Water and Climate, on January 21, 2016. In September 2016, during the 17th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, the Service met with representatives from Zimbabwe to further discuss the current status of the Service's evaluation of the importation of elephant trophies. As a result of those conversations, the Service received a letter dated November 8, 2016, with supplemental information regarding Zimbabwe's elephant management plan priorities. Further, on January 27, 2017, the Service received a letter from ZPWMA containing a report, ``The Role of Trophy Hunting of Elephants in Support of the Zimbabwe's Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) Program: December 2016'' that more fully discussed the source and amount of revenue generated between 2010 and 2015 through the CAMPFIRE program, the current role of CAMPFIRE, and how revenue generated by elephant hunting has been utilized within communal areas over this 6-year period and into the future. Under 50 CFR 17.40(e)(6)(i)(B), the Service evaluates a number of factors to determine whether the killing of the trophy animal taken in a range country will enhance the survival of African elephants as well as taking into consideration the permit issuance criteria outlined in 50 CFR 17.32(a)(2). In evaluating each of these criteria, the Service has considered the information currently available to the Service as of the date of this finding on elephant hunting in Zimbabwe in 2016, 2017, and 2018, including information provided by the Government of Zimbabwe, current applicants for permits to import sport-hunted elephant trophies, interested individuals and organizations, and other information available to the Service. Zimbabwe's Conservation Efforts for Elephants On January 21, 2016, Zimbabwe adopted the Zimbabwe National Elephant Management Plan (2015-2020) (EMP) that replaced The Policy and Plan for Elephant Management in Zimbabwe (1997) and Elephant Management in Zimbabwe, third edition (July 1996), the former management plans. The EMP incorporates an adaptive management framework with higher level targets, with key components, strategic objectives, and outputs. Each key component has management actions that can be measured and verified through ``Key Performance Indicators.'' A set deadline for each action was identified. These measurable provisions allow ZPWMA to monitor the success of the new management plan and, through an adaptive management approach, address newly emerging concerns and long-term management needs. The EMP addresses the challenges identified by the 2014 workshop participants and concerns identified by the Service about the previous management plans. The EMP was developed as an outcome of several national and regional workshops that included government officials, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), rural community leaders, and safari outfitters and landowners. The 2014 Pan African Elephant Aerial Survey, also known as the Great Elephant Census (GEC), available in 2015, provided ZPWMA with a better elephant baseline population abundance estimate to assess future hunting quotas, management efforts, and anti-poaching activities. Confirmed results from the GEC reported an estimate for elephant abundance in Zimbabwe to be 82,304 individuals (73,715-90,893). The International Union for Conservation of Nature's African Elephant Specialist Group (IUCN AfESG) African Elephant Status Report-2016 estimated Zimbabwe's elephant population at 82,6308,589 across a range of 81,228 km\2\. The results of the 2014 GEC, and subsequent survey data reported in the 2016 AfESG report, are more reliable and provide a better basis for [[Page 54407]] establishing management priorities than previous surveys and guesses, and are now utilized in the EMP and quota setting. As identified in the 2015 finding, the Service explained that, if properly implemented, the ZPWMA regulatory mechanisms for managing elephants appear to be adequate. A key issue in the 2015 finding was whether an adequate mechanism is in place to reliably document the financial benefits that U.S. hunters provide for elephant conservation through participation in a hunting program that addresses management needs of the species and whether the funds were utilized in a meaningful manner. Since the 2015 finding, the Service has received information regarding the Tourism Receipts Accounting System (TRAS) and its web-based system (TRAS2) under which the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, in collaboration with relevant stakeholders, can now track all revenue generated through hunting activities. Under this system, all authorized hunts are now being registered, allowing for the capture of hunting data, such as the origin of clients, value of trophies and hunts, and area hunted, so that officials can monitor hunting quota utilization and track hunted trophies. This system will provide data that was not previously easily obtained and greatly improve the ability to track hunting revenue. One concern expressed by the Service in its previous findings was whether ZPWMA was responding to the apparent poaching crisis facing Zimbabwe. Based on communication from ZPWMA, as well as information received from other sources, ZPWMA has stepped up its anti-poaching efforts nationally by adopting a number of ``Urgent Measures.'' As shown in their July 2015 response to Service questions, most of ZPWMA's budget (77 percent) is allocated to staff costs and patrol provisions. These expenditures reportedly fund anti-poaching efforts throughout the elephant range. ZPWMA reportedly has a staff of 1,504 active field rangers and has stated that there is intent to increase this number. According to ``The Zimbabwe National Elephant Supplementary Management Plan (2015-2020)'', provided to the Service in late 2016, over 80 percent of spending under the new EMP has been on law enforcement (anti-poaching) and training, with law enforcement identified as the top priority going forward. With the adoption of the EMP on January 21, 2016, it appears that ZPWMA has the means to successfully implement these laws and regulations. Moreover, ZPWMA has a mechanism in place to monitor the effects of the EMP and adapt to changing environmental and social factors that would adversely affect elephant populations within Zimbabwe. According to the information provided to the Service in late 2014 and 2015, Zimbabwe had established hunting quotas for all areas of the country. However, it was not until late 2015 and early 2016 that the Service received more specific information on how these quotas are established, including how other forms of take, such as poaching and problem animal control, were taken into account. Further, it was not until the EMP was signed into effect on January 21, 2016, that the Service had confidence that ZWPMA had in place effective mechanisms to ensure long-term sustainability of its elephant population. According to ZPWMA, quotas that were established before the EMP were set to maximize the sustainable production of high-quality trophies without detriment to the population. With the establishment of the EMP, there is a more systematic, scientific approach to establish national quotas. While ZPWMA still currently starts with an annual quota of 500 elephants, the quota is not immediately divided among all of the hunting areas. Instead, ZPWMA takes into consideration the results of the 2014 survey and subsequent surveys, results from research efforts, the size of the hunting area in relation to elephant habitat requirements, illegal harvest and other forms of take, how the hunting areas are managed in relation to land use or fencing, human- wildlife conflicts that have occurred previously, and recommended sustainable harvest levels developed based on ecological assessments of the hunting area. This information is then further evaluated in consideration of other species within the hunting area, past elephant trophy quality, and community benefits of proposed harvests. Since our findings in 2014 and 2015, CAMPFIRE has provided more information on how their programs support the conservation of elephants and provide benefits to and promote greater tolerance of wildlife in rural communities, including new efforts to improve the effectiveness of CAMPFIRE and new revenue-sharing guidelines. An overarching analysis of CAMPFIRE, supported by a grant of 12 million Euros from the European Union, is currently being conducted and is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2017. Although this review is still under way, more information has been provided to the Service regarding how funds are utilized and the basis for hunting quotas. Since our 2014 and 2015 findings, there are strong indications that the efforts of private landowners and consortiums to manage elephants within their areas of control have received greater support from ZPWMA and the Zimbabwean Government. ZPWMA has devolved authority to manage and benefit from wildlife on communal and private lands to the landholders. There now appears to be a greater effort on the part of ZPWMA to work with NGOs, landowners, and safari area concessionaires to improve elephant management and anti-poaching efforts. According to their July 2015 response to the Service, and supported by the report on the implementation of the EMP, ZPWMA is engaging private players in co- management in some areas and entering into long-term lease agreements (10-25 years) to manage some protected areas. In certain areas, ZPWMA is reportedly collaborating with safari operators; in others, they collaborate with NGOs, such as the Tashinga Initiative in the Zambezi Valley and World Wildlife Fund in the Hwange-Sanyati Biological Corridor. There is increased support from the Central Government and Rural District Councils to expand and support local conservation efforts, and there is evidence that local conservation efforts are meeting management deficiencies that the Service identified previously. Current Finding Therefore, in accordance with the regulatory requirements, the Service is able to make a determination that the killing of trophy animals in Zimbabwe, on or after January 21, 2016, and on or before December 31, 2018, will enhance the survival of the African elephant. With the information currently available, applications to import trophies hunted during this time period will be considered to have met this requirement unless we issue a new finding based on available information. In accordance with the section 4(d) rule for the African elephant at 50 CFR 17.40(e), the Service will review each application received for import of such specimens on a case-by-case basis and each application also needs to meet all other applicable permitting requirements before it may be authorized. On an ongoing basis and as it evaluates each application, the Service will continue to monitor the status of the elephant population, the management program for elephants in the country to ensure that the program is promoting the conservation of the species, and whether the participation [[Page 54408]] of U.S. hunters in the program provides a clear benefit to the species. Accordingly, the Service may modify its determination based on available information consistent with the regulatory requirements. In addition, the Service will reevaluate the status of African elephants in Zimbabwe before the end of 2018 and make a new finding in the beginning of 2019 for, at least, the 2019 hunting season. Today's enhancement finding has been posted at http://www.fws.gov/international/pdf/enhancement-finding-2017-elephant-Zimbabwe.PDF. In addition, a list of frequently asked questions regarding the importation of sport-hunted elephant trophies from Zimbabwe is available on the Service's web page at https://www.fws.gov/international/permits/by-activity/sport-hunted-trophies-elephants.html. Brenda Tapia, Program Analyst/Data Administrator, Branch of Permits, Division of Management Authority. [FR Doc. 2017-24974 Filed 11-16-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices 54405
Dated: November 13, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: population and the total management
Pamela H. Patenaude, Timothy J. Van Norman, (703) 358–2104 program for the elephant in each
Deputy Secretary. (telephone); (703) 358–2280 (fax); or country to ensure the program is
[FR Doc. 2017–25024 Filed 11–16–17; 8:45 am] DMAFR@fws.gov (email). promoting the conservation of the
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: species.
The preamble to the 1997 proposed
Background rule noted that positive enhancement
The African elephant (Loxodonta findings for the countries of Zimbabwe,
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR africana) is listed as threatened under Botswana, and Namibia had been made
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as and would remain in effect until the
Fish and Wildlife Service Service found that the conditions of the
amended (ESA or Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), on the List of Endangered and section 4(d) rule are no longer met and
[FWS–HQ–IA–2017–N116; published notice of a changed finding in
FXIA16710900000–XXX–FF09A30000] Threatened Wildlife in title 50 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (50 CFR the Federal Register. On May 18, 2001,
17.11(h)). It is also regulated under the we published a final rule again
Issuance of Import Permits for
provisions of section 4(d) of the Act announcing decisions made at a meeting
Zimbabwe Elephant Trophies Taken on
(known as a ‘‘section 4(d) rule’’) with a of the Conference of the Parties to
or After January 21, 2016, and on or
rule found at 50 CFR 17.40(e). The CITES, including the decision to down-
Before December 31, 2018
section 4(d) rule includes specific list the South African population of
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, requirements for the import of sport- African elephants from CITES Appendix
Interior. hunted trophies. Under I to Appendix II (66 FR 27601). We
ACTION: Notice. again discussed the import requirements
§ 17.40(e)(6)(i)(B), in order for the
for African elephant sport-hunted
Service to authorize the import of a
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife trophies and stated that the
sport-hunted elephant trophy, the
Service (Service) has made a finding enhancement finding for South African
Service must find that the killing of the
that the killing of African elephant elephants would remain in effect until
trophy animal will enhance the survival
trophy animals in Zimbabwe, on or after the Service found that conditions of the
of the species in the wild (known as an
January 21, 2016, and on or before rule are no longer met and published
‘‘enhancement finding’’).
December 31, 2018, will enhance the notice of a changed finding in the
The Zimbabwe elephant population, Federal Register. The U.S. District Court
survival of the African elephant. along with elephant populations in
Applications to import trophies hunted for the District of Columbia, in Safari
Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa, Club International, et al. v. Jewell, et al.,
during this time period will be are also included in Appendix II of the
considered to have met the 213 F. Supp. 3d 48 (D.D.C. Sept. 30,
Convention on International Trade in 2016), has held that the Service created
enhancement requirement, unless we Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
issue a new finding based on available a binding duty on itself when it stated
Flora (CITES) for the exclusive purpose in the preamble of the 1997 proposed
information. The Service may replace of allowing certain trade subject to
this finding, without any notification in rule that it would publish notice in the
annotation, including trade in hunting Federal Register before making a change
the Federal Register, at any time that trophies for noncommercial purposes.
this finding no longer reflects the in its 1997 enhancement finding for
All specimens not included in the Zimbabwe, and that the Service then
available information consistent with annotation are deemed Appendix I
the regulatory requirements. In violated this commitment when it
specimens, and trade in them is published the Federal Register notice
reviewing each application received for regulated accordingly. On August 22,
import of such specimens, the Service on May 12, 2014, several weeks after
1997, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service making an interim negative
evaluates the information provided in (Service) published a proposed rule
the application, as well as other enhancement finding for Zimbabwe on
announcing decisions by the Conference April 4, 2014. As remedy, the Court
information available to the Service on of the Parties to CITES and seeking
the status of the elephant population ordered that the effective date of the
comment on whether the United States 2014 enhancement finding is the date of
and the management program for should enter a reservation for any of the
elephants in the country to ensure that the Federal Register notice, May 12,
species that had been listed on CITES 2014, meaning that trophies taken on or
the program is promoting the Appendices I and II (62 FR 44627). We
conservation of the species. Each before May 11, 2014 were allowed to
discussed how the populations of meet the enhancement requirement. We
application to import sport-hunted African elephants in Zimbabwe,
elephant trophies must also meet all did not intend to create a legal duty to
Botswana, and Namibia had been down- publish changed enhancement findings
other applicable permitting listed from CITES Appendix I to
requirements before it may be through these Federal Register
Appendix II and noted that, because preamble statements.
authorized. This determination does not African elephants are listed under the On June 6, 2016, the Service amended
affect previous determinations by the ESA as threatened, the African elephant the African elephant section 4(d) rule
Service regarding trophy animals taken section 4(d) rule found at 50 CFR (81 FR 36388). With this amendment,
before January 21, 2016. 17.40(e) would continue to apply. This ESA permits are required to import all
DATES: This finding is made November rule required that we find that the African elephant sport-hunted trophies,
17, 2017. killing of the animal whose trophy was
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
including those from the CITES
ADDRESSES: Timothy J. Van Norman, intended for import would enhance the Appendix II populations of Zimbabwe,
Chief, Branch of Permits, Division of survival of the species before a sport- Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa.
Management Authority, U.S. Fish and hunted trophy could be imported. We Because all imports will be
Wildlife Service, MS: IA, 5275 Leesburg also stated that, in making the required accompanied by a threatened species
Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803; fax enhancement finding for the import of permit evaluated through the ESA
(703) 358–2280; or email DMAFR@ sport-hunted trophies, the Service must permit application process found at 50
fws.gov. review the status of the elephant CFR 17.32(a), we will no longer publish
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Nov 16, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_54626/page/1.svg)
![54408 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices
of U.S. hunters in the program provides involvement activities at least 15 days mining and related activities under the
a clear benefit to the species. in advance through public notices, General Mining Law, based on
Accordingly, the Service may modify its media releases, or mailings. ASARCO’s mining and mill site claims
determination based on available ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the Selected Lands. But the court
information consistent with the related to the Ray Land Exchange/Plan believed that the manner and extent of
regulatory requirements. In addition, the Amendment Draft Supplemental EIS by mining were likely to differ, depending
Service will reevaluate the status of any of the following methods: on whether the Selected Lands are
African elephants in Zimbabwe before • Web site: http://go.usa.gov/xn2FG. owned by the United States as public
the end of 2018 and make a new finding • Email: blm_az_raylandexchange@ lands subject to the BLM’s surface use
in the beginning of 2019 for, at least, the blm.gov. regulations at 43 CFR 3809 or by
2019 hunting season. • Fax: 602–417–9454. ASARCO as private lands in fee simple,
Today’s enhancement finding has • Mail: BLM Arizona State Office, in which case the BLM’s surface-use
been posted at http://www.fws.gov/ Attn: Ray Land Exchange, One North regulations would not apply. The Ninth
international/pdf/enhancement-finding- Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, AZ Circuit Court stated that ASARCO is not
2017-elephant-Zimbabwe.PDF. In 85004–4427. required to prepare and submit a Mine
addition, a list of frequently asked Copies of the Ray Land Exchange/ Plan of Operations (MPO) for future
questions regarding the importation of Plan Amendment Draft Supplemental activities on the Selected Lands to
sport-hunted elephant trophies from EIS are available in the BLM Arizona complete the exchange. Instead, ‘‘the
Zimbabwe is available on the Service’s State Office at the above address; the BLM must make a meaningful
web page at https://www.fws.gov/ BLM Tucson Field Office at 3201 East comparison of the environmental
international/permits/by-activity/sport- Universal Way, Tucson, AZ 85756; the consequences of ASARCO’s likely
hunted-trophies-elephants.html. BLM Kingman Field Office at 2755 mining operations with and without the
Mission Boulevard, Kingman, AZ requirement that MPOs be prepared by
Brenda Tapia, ASARCO and approved by the BLM—
86401; and the Kearny Public Library at
Program Analyst/Data Administrator, Branch 912–A Tilbury Road, Kearny, AZ 85137. that is, with and without the proposed
of Permits, Division of Management exchange.’’ Because the BLM did not
Authority. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Werner, Project Manager, perform this ‘‘with and without’’
[FR Doc. 2017–24974 Filed 11–16–17; 8:45 am] comparison, the court held that the BLM
telephone 602–417–9561; address: One
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
North Central Avenue, Suite 800, did not adequately consider the
Phoenix, AZ 85004–4427; email: environmental impacts of the land
mwerner@blm.gov. exchange or Resource Management Plan
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (RMP) amendments. For the same
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
reason, the court also held that the BLM
Bureau of Land Management Gila District, Tucson Field Office, is
did not properly analyze whether the
issuing the Ray Land Exchange/Plan
[XXX.LLAZG02000.71220000.KD0000 public interest will be served by making
Amendment Supplemental EIS to the exchange under FLPMA, section
.LVTFA0958340;AZA3116]
augment the environmental impact 206(a).
Notice of Availability of the Draft Ray analysis in the Ray Land Exchange/Plan In accordance with the courts’ rulings
Land Exchange/Plan Amendment Amendment Final EIS completed by the and remand orders, the Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact BLM in 1999. The BLM issued the Final Supplemental EIS for the Ray Land
Statement, Arizona EIS for the Ray Land Exchange/Plan Exchange provides the ‘‘with and
Amendment in June 1999 and the without’’ comparative analysis found
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Record of Decision in May 2000. The lacking by the Ninth Circuit Court. The
Interior. decision approved a land exchange ‘‘with and without’’ analysis compares
ACTION: Notice of availability. between ASARCO LLC (ASARCO) and two scenarios of potential
the BLM for approximately 10,976 acres environmental impacts on the Selected
SUMMARY: In accordance with the of public lands and federally owned Lands from mining operations. One
National Environmental Policy Act of mineral estate for acquisition by scenario analyzes potential impacts that
1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the ASARCO (the Selected Lands) in could occur as a result of mining
Federal Land Policy and Management exchange for approximately 7,304 acres activities on the Selected Lands if they
Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as amended, the of private land owned by ASARCO and are not exchanged and remain under
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), identified by the BLM as desirable for BLM jurisdiction (i.e., mining occurs
Gila District, Tucson Field Office has improving access for hunting and other with BLM regulations). The other
prepared a Draft Supplemental recreation (the Offered Lands). The scenario analyzes potential impacts that
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) decision was challenged could occur as a result of mining
for the Ray Land Exchange/Plan administratively and in Federal court, activities if the Selected Lands are
Amendment and by this Notice is with the plaintiffs ultimately prevailing exchanged and become privately owned
announcing its availability and the in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in lands (i.e., mining occurs without BLM
opening of the comment period. November 2010. The court concluded regulations). The Draft Supplemental
DATES: To ensure comments will be that the BLM violated NEPA and EIS also addresses any substantial
considered, the BLM must receive FLPMA ‘‘in assuming without changes in the land exchange or plan
written comments on the Ray Land explanation that ASARCO would
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
amendments and any significant new
Exchange/Plan Amendment Draft perform mining operations on the information or circumstances that are
Supplemental EIS within 90 days selected lands in the same manner relevant to analyzing the impacts of the
following the date the Environmental regardless of the land exchange’’ (Center land exchange or plan amendments (see
Protection Agency publishes its Notice for Biological Diversity v. U.S. 40 CFR 1502.9(c); BLM NEPA
of Availability in the Federal Register. Department of Interior, 623 F.3d 633 Handbook, Section 5.3 [January 2008]).
The BLM will announce future meetings [9th Cir. 2010]). The court recognized The purpose of the proposed Ray
or hearings and any other public that ASARCO has the right to conduct Land Exchange would be to exchange
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Nov 16, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_54626/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-17 05:15:19
Document Modified: 2017-11-17 05:15:19
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Dates | This finding is made November 17, 2017. | |
| Contact | Timothy J. Van Norman, (703) 358-2104 (telephone); (703) 358-2280 (fax); or [email protected] (email). | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 54405 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR