82_FR_54634 82 FR 54413 - Certain Mobile Device Holders and Components Thereof; Commission's Determination To Review In-Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions

82 FR 54413 - Certain Mobile Device Holders and Components Thereof; Commission's Determination To Review In-Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 221 (November 17, 2017)

Page Range54413-54414
FR Document2017-24927

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in-part the final initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on September 12, 2017, finding a violation of section 337 in the above-captioned investigation. Specifically, the Commission has determined to review the ID's analysis and findings with respect to the economic prong of the domestic industry. The Commission also requests written submissions, under the schedule set forth below, on remedy, the public interest, and bonding.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 221 (Friday, November 17, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54413-54414]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24927]



[[Page 54413]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1028]


Certain Mobile Device Holders and Components Thereof; 
Commission's Determination To Review In-Part a Final Initial 
Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written 
Submissions

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to review in-part the final initial 
determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') on September 12, 2017, finding a violation of section 337 in 
the above-captioned investigation. Specifically, the Commission has 
determined to review the ID's analysis and findings with respect to the 
economic prong of the domestic industry. The Commission also requests 
written submissions, under the schedule set forth below, on remedy, the 
public interest, and bonding.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office 
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of 
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on November 14, 2016, based on a complaint and supplements, filed on 
behalf of Nite Ize, Inc. of Boulder, Colorado (``Nite Ize''). 81 FR 
79519-20 (Nov. 14, 2016). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain mobile device holders and components 
thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 
8,602,376 (``the '376 patent''), U.S. Patent No. 8,870,146 (``the '146 
patent''), U.S. Patent No. D734,746 (``the '746 patent''), and U.S. 
Patent No. D719,959 (``the '959 patent''). The complaint further 
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The Commission's notice of 
investigation named the following respondents: REXS LLC of Lewes, 
Delaware; Spinido, Inc. of Brighton, Colorado; Guangzhou Kuaguoyi E-
commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Kagu Culture (``Kagu Culture'') of Baiyum, 
China; Sunpauto Co., Ltd. of Kowloon, Hong Kong; Shenzhen Topworld 
Technology Co. d/b/a IdeaPro (``IdeaPro'') of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; 
Ninghuaxian Wangfulong Chaojishichang Youxian Gongsi, Ltd., d/b/a 
EasybuyUS of Shanghai, China; Chang Lee d/b/a Frentaly of Duluth, 
Georgia; Trendbox USA LLC d/b/a Trendbox (``Trendbox'') of Scottsdale, 
Arizona; Tenswall d/b/a Shenzhen Tenswall International Trading Co. of 
La Puente, California; Luo Jieqiong d/b/a Wekin of Chang Sha, China; 
Pecham d/b/a Baichen Technology Ltd. of Wan Chai, Hong Kong; Cyrift d/
b/a Guangzhou Sunway Ecommerce LLC. of Guangzhou, China; Rymemo d/b/a 
Global Box, LLC of Dunbar, Pennsylvania; Yuan I d/b/a Bestrix of Hubei, 
China; Zhongshan Feiyu Hardware Technology Co., Ltd d/b/a YouFo 
(``YouFo'') of ZhongShan City, China; and Shenzhen Youtai Trade Company 
Limited, d/b/a NoChoice; Luo, Qiben, d/b/a Lita International Shop of 
Nanshan; Shenzhen New Dream Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a Newdreams 
(``Newdreams''); Shenznen Gold South Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a 
Baidatong; Wang Zhi Gang d/b/a IceFox (``Icefox''); Dang Yuya d/b/a 
Sminiker; Lin Zhen Mei d/b/a Anson (``Anson''); Wu Xuying d/b/a 
Novoland; Shenzhen New Dream Sailing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/
b/a MegaDream; Tontek d/b/a Shenzhen Hetongtai Electronics Co., Ltd.; 
Scotabc d/b/a ShenChuang Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.; Zhiping 
Zhou d/b/a Runshion; Huijukon d/b/a Shenzhen Hui Ju Kang Technology Co. 
Ltd.; Barsone d/b/a Shenzhen Senweite Electronic Commerce Ltd.; Oumeiou 
d/b/a Shenzhen Oumeiou Technology Co., Ltd. (``Oumeiou''); Grando d/b/a 
Shenzhen Dashentai Network Technology Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Yingxue 
Technology Co., Ltd. (``Shenzhen Yingxue''); Shenzhen Longwang 
Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a LWANG; Hu Peng d/b/a AtomBud; Wang Guoxiang 
d/b/a Minse (``Minse'') all of Shenzhen, China. The Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations (``OUII'') was named as a party to the 
investigation.
    Global Box, LLC and Chang Lee d/b/a Frentaly were terminated on the 
basis of a consent order. Commission Notice (March 21, 2017); 
Commission Notice (May 15, 2017). Barsone d/b/a Shenzhen Senweite 
Electronic Commerce Ltd., Shenzhen Youtai Trade Company Limited, d/b/a 
NoChoice, Ninghuaxian Wangfulong Chaojishichang Youxian Gongsi, Ltd., 
d/b/a EasybuyUS, Shenzhen Gold South Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a 
Baidatong, Cyrift d/b/a Guangzhou Sunway E-Commerce LLC, Hu Peng d/b/a 
AtomBud, Grando d/b/a Shenzhen Dashentai Network Technology Co., Ltd., 
Huijukon d/b/a Shenzhen Hui Ju Kang Technology Co. Ltd., Luo, Qiben, d/
b/a Lita International Shop, Shenzhen New Dream Sailing Electronic 
Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a MegaDream, Spinido Inc., Dang Yuya d/b/a 
Sminiker, and Yuan I d/b/a Bestrix were terminated because service 
could not be effected. Commission Notice (June 13, 2017). The remaining 
respondents were previously found in default (collectively, ``the 
Defaulting Respondents''). Commission Notice (May 26, 2017). In 
addition, the '746 and '959 patents were previously terminated from the 
investigation. Commission Notice (July 28, 2017).
    On May 18, 2017, Nite Ize filed a Motion for Summary Determination 
of Violation by the Defaulting Respondents and for a Recommended 
Determination on Remedy and Bonding, Including Issuance of a General 
Exclusion Order, Limited Exclusion Orders, and Cease and Desist Orders. 
On June 16, 2017, the ALJ issued Order No. 14 granting in-part Nite 
Ize's motion for summary determination. The Commission determined not 
to review that ID. Commission Notice (July 14, 2017).
    On September 12, 2017, the ALJ issued his final ID finding a 
violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337. On 
the same day, the ALJ issued his Recommended Determination on Remedy 
and Bonding. No petitions for review were filed.
    The Commission has determined to review the subject ID in-part. 
Specifically, the Commission has determined to review the ID's analysis 
and findings with respect to the economic prong of the domestic 
industry requirement. The Commission

[[Page 54414]]

does not request any submissions on the issue under review.
    In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the 
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of 
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2) 
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the 
respondent(s) being required to cease and desist from engaging in 
unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, 
the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that 
address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party 
seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for 
purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate 
and provide information establishing that activities involving other 
types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. 
For background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via 
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994) 
(Comm'n Op.). In particular, the written submissions should address any 
request for a cease and desist order in the context of recent 
Commission opinions, including those in Certain Arrowheads with 
Deploying Blades and Components Thereof and Packaging Therefor, Inv. 
No. 337-TA-977, Comm'n Op. (Apr. 28, 2017) and Certain Electric Skin 
Care Devices, Brushes and Chargers Therefor, and Kits Containing the 
Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-959, Comm'n Op. (Feb. 13, 2017). Specifically, if 
Complainant seeks a cease and desist order against a defaulting 
respondent, the written submissions should respond to the following 
requests:

    (1) Please identify with citations to the record any information 
regarding commercially significant inventory in the United States as 
to each respondent against whom a cease and desist order is sought. 
If Complainant also relies on other significant domestic operations 
that could undercut the remedy provided by an exclusion order, 
please identify with citations to the record such information as to 
each respondent against whom a cease and desist order is sought.
    (2) In relation to the infringing products, please identify any 
information in the record, including allegations in the pleadings, 
that addresses the existence of any domestic inventory, any domestic 
operations, or any sales-related activity directed at the United 
States for each respondent against whom a cease and desist order is 
sought.

    If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must 
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The 
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an 
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the 
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. 
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly 
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. 
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written 
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in 
the context of this investigation.
    If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade 
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve 
or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of 
July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the 
subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under 
bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the 
Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in 
receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be 
imposed if a remedy is ordered.
    Written Submissions: Each party's written submission must be filed 
no later than close of business on Thursday, November 30, 2017. Reply 
submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on 
Thursday, December 7, 2017. No further submissions on these issues will 
be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.
    Persons filing written submissions must file the original document 
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day 
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.4(f), 19 CFR 210.4(f). Submissions 
should refer to the investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-1028'') in 
a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See 
Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf). Persons with 
questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary, (202) 205-
2000.
    Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in 
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests 
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include 
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such 
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment 
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All 
information, including confidential business information and documents 
for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the 
Commission for purposes of this Investigation may be disclosed to and 
used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract 
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a 
related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, 
and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of 
the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 
government employees and contract personnel,\1\ solely for 
cybersecurity purposes. All non-confidential written submissions will 
be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and 
on EDIS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure 
agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 
part 210.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 13, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-24927 Filed 11-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                                            Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices                                           54413

                                                INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                     United States after importation of                    (‘‘Shenzhen Yingxue’’); Shenzhen
                                                COMMISSION                                              certain mobile device holders and                     Longwang Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a
                                                                                                        components thereof by reason of                       LWANG; Hu Peng d/b/a AtomBud;
                                                [Investigation No. 337–TA–1028]
                                                                                                        infringement of certain claims of U.S.                Wang Guoxiang d/b/a Minse (‘‘Minse’’)
                                                Certain Mobile Device Holders and                       Patent No. 8,602,376 (‘‘the ’376 patent’’),           all of Shenzhen, China. The Office of
                                                Components Thereof; Commission’s                        U.S. Patent No. 8,870,146 (‘‘the ’146                 Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’)
                                                Determination To Review In-Part a                       patent’’), U.S. Patent No. D734,746 (‘‘the            was named as a party to the
                                                Final Initial Determination Finding a                   ’746 patent’’), and U.S. Patent No.                   investigation.
                                                Violation of Section 337; Request for                   D719,959 (‘‘the ’959 patent’’). The                      Global Box, LLC and Chang Lee
                                                Written Submissions                                     complaint further alleges that an                     d/b/a Frentaly were terminated on the
                                                                                                        industry in the United States exists as               basis of a consent order. Commission
                                                AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                        required by subsection (a)(2) of section              Notice (March 21, 2017); Commission
                                                Commission.                                             337. The Commission’s notice of                       Notice (May 15, 2017). Barsone d/b/a
                                                ACTION: Notice.                                         investigation named the following                     Shenzhen Senweite Electronic
                                                                                                        respondents: REXS LLC of Lewes,                       Commerce Ltd., Shenzhen Youtai Trade
                                                SUMMARY:     Notice is hereby given that                Delaware; Spinido, Inc. of Brighton,                  Company Limited, d/b/a NoChoice,
                                                the U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                        Colorado; Guangzhou Kuaguoyi E-                       Ninghuaxian Wangfulong
                                                Commission has determined to review
                                                                                                        commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Kagu Culture                 Chaojishichang Youxian Gongsi, Ltd., d/
                                                in-part the final initial determination
                                                                                                        (‘‘Kagu Culture’’) of Baiyum, China;                  b/a EasybuyUS, Shenzhen Gold South
                                                (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding
                                                                                                        Sunpauto Co., Ltd. of Kowloon, Hong                   Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Baidatong,
                                                administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on
                                                                                                        Kong; Shenzhen Topworld Technology                    Cyrift d/b/a Guangzhou Sunway E-
                                                September 12, 2017, finding a violation
                                                                                                        Co. d/b/a IdeaPro (‘‘IdeaPro’’) of Hong               Commerce LLC, Hu Peng d/b/a
                                                of section 337 in the above-captioned
                                                                                                        Kong, Hong Kong; Ninghuaxian                          AtomBud, Grando d/b/a Shenzhen
                                                investigation. Specifically, the
                                                                                                        Wangfulong Chaojishichang Youxian                     Dashentai Network Technology Co.,
                                                Commission has determined to review
                                                                                                        Gongsi, Ltd.,                                         Ltd., Huijukon d/b/a Shenzhen Hui Ju
                                                the ID’s analysis and findings with
                                                                                                        d/b/a EasybuyUS of Shanghai, China;                   Kang Technology Co. Ltd., Luo, Qiben,
                                                respect to the economic prong of the
                                                                                                        Chang Lee d/b/a Frentaly of Duluth,                   d/b/a Lita International Shop, Shenzhen
                                                domestic industry. The Commission
                                                                                                        Georgia; Trendbox USA LLC d/b/a                       New Dream Sailing Electronic
                                                also requests written submissions,
                                                                                                        Trendbox (‘‘Trendbox’’) of Scottsdale,                Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a MegaDream,
                                                under the schedule set forth below, on
                                                                                                        Arizona; Tenswall d/b/a Shenzhen                      Spinido Inc., Dang Yuya d/b/a
                                                remedy, the public interest, and
                                                                                                        Tenswall International Trading Co. of La              Sminiker, and Yuan I d/b/a Bestrix were
                                                bonding.
                                                                                                        Puente, California; Luo Jieqiong d/b/a                terminated because service could not be
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        Wekin of Chang Sha, China; Pecham d/                  effected. Commission Notice (June 13,
                                                Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office                   b/a Baichen Technology Ltd. of Wan                    2017). The remaining respondents were
                                                of the General Counsel, U.S.                            Chai, Hong Kong; Cyrift d/b/a                         previously found in default
                                                International Trade Commission, 500 E                   Guangzhou Sunway Ecommerce LLC. of                    (collectively, ‘‘the Defaulting
                                                Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                       Guangzhou, China; Rymemo d/b/a                        Respondents’’). Commission Notice
                                                telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of                     Global Box, LLC of Dunbar,                            (May 26, 2017). In addition, the ’746
                                                non-confidential documents filed in                     Pennsylvania; Yuan I d/b/a Bestrix of                 and ’959 patents were previously
                                                connection with this investigation are or               Hubei, China; Zhongshan Feiyu                         terminated from the investigation.
                                                will be available for inspection during                 Hardware Technology Co., Ltd                          Commission Notice (July 28, 2017).
                                                official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15              d/b/a YouFo (‘‘YouFo’’) of ZhongShan                     On May 18, 2017, Nite Ize filed a
                                                p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.              City, China; and Shenzhen Youtai Trade                Motion for Summary Determination of
                                                International Trade Commission, 500 E                   Company Limited, d/b/a NoChoice; Luo,                 Violation by the Defaulting Respondents
                                                Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                       Qiben, d/b/a Lita International Shop of               and for a Recommended Determination
                                                telephone (202) 205–2000. General                       Nanshan; Shenzhen New Dream                           on Remedy and Bonding, Including
                                                information concerning the Commission                   Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a Newdreams                 Issuance of a General Exclusion Order,
                                                may also be obtained by accessing its                   (‘‘Newdreams’’); Shenznen Gold South                  Limited Exclusion Orders, and Cease
                                                Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.               Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Baidatong;                 and Desist Orders. On June 16, 2017, the
                                                The public record for this investigation                Wang Zhi Gang d/b/a IceFox (‘‘Icefox’’);              ALJ issued Order No. 14 granting in-part
                                                may be viewed on the Commission’s                       Dang Yuya d/b/a Sminiker; Lin Zhen                    Nite Ize’s motion for summary
                                                electronic docket (EDIS) at https://                    Mei d/b/a Anson (‘‘Anson’’); Wu Xuying                determination. The Commission
                                                edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                        d/b/a Novoland; Shenzhen New Dream                    determined not to review that ID.
                                                persons are advised that information on                 Sailing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.               Commission Notice (July 14, 2017).
                                                this matter can be obtained by                          d/b/a MegaDream; Tontek d/b/a                            On September 12, 2017, the ALJ
                                                contacting the Commission’s TDD                         Shenzhen Hetongtai Electronics Co.,                   issued his final ID finding a violation of
                                                terminal on (202) 205–1810.                             Ltd.; Scotabc d/b/a ShenChuang                        section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19
                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                          Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.;                 U.S.C. 1337. On the same day, the ALJ
                                                Commission instituted this investigation                Zhiping Zhou d/b/a Runshion;                          issued his Recommended Determination
                                                on November 14, 2016, based on a                        Huijukon d/b/a Shenzhen Hui Ju Kang                   on Remedy and Bonding. No petitions
                                                complaint and supplements, filed on                     Technology Co. Ltd.; Barsone d/b/a                    for review were filed.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                behalf of Nite Ize, Inc. of Boulder,                    Shenzhen Senweite Electronic                             The Commission has determined to
                                                Colorado (‘‘Nite Ize’’). 81 FR 79519–20                 Commerce Ltd.; Oumeiou d/b/a                          review the subject ID in-part.
                                                (Nov. 14, 2016). The complaint, as                      Shenzhen Oumeiou Technology Co.,                      Specifically, the Commission has
                                                supplemented, alleges violations of                     Ltd. (‘‘Oumeiou’’); Grando d/b/a                      determined to review the ID’s analysis
                                                section 337 based upon the importation                  Shenzhen Dashentai Network                            and findings with respect to the
                                                into the United States, the sale for                    Technology Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen                        economic prong of the domestic
                                                importation, and the sale within the                    Yingxue Technology Co., Ltd.                          industry requirement. The Commission


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:32 Nov 16, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00098   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM   17NON1


                                                54414                       Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices

                                                does not request any submissions on the                 will consider include the effect that an              including confidential business
                                                issue under review.                                     exclusion order and/or cease and desist               information and documents for which
                                                   In connection with the final                         orders would have on (1) the public                   confidential treatment is properly
                                                disposition of this investigation, the                  health and welfare, (2) competitive                   sought, submitted to the Commission for
                                                Commission may (1) issue an order that                  conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.              purposes of this Investigation may be
                                                could result in the exclusion of the                    production of articles that are like or               disclosed to and used: (i) By the
                                                subject articles from entry into the                    directly competitive with those that are              Commission, its employees and Offices,
                                                United States, and/or (2) issue one or                  subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.                and contract personnel (a) for
                                                more cease and desist orders that could                 consumers. The Commission is                          developing or maintaining the records
                                                result in the respondent(s) being                       therefore interested in receiving written             of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
                                                required to cease and desist from                       submissions that address the                          internal investigations, audits, reviews,
                                                engaging in unfair acts in the                          aforementioned public interest factors                and evaluations relating to the
                                                importation and sale of such articles.                  in the context of this investigation.                 programs, personnel, and operations of
                                                Accordingly, the Commission is                             If the Commission orders some form                 the Commission including under 5
                                                interested in receiving written                         of remedy, the U.S. Trade                             U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
                                                submissions that address the form of                    Representative, as delegated by the                   government employees and contract
                                                remedy, if any, that should be ordered.                 President, has 60 days to approve or                  personnel,1 solely for cybersecurity
                                                If a party seeks exclusion of an article                disapprove the Commission’s action.                   purposes. All non-confidential written
                                                from entry into the United States for                   See Presidential Memorandum of July                   submissions will be available for public
                                                purposes other than entry for                           21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).                inspection at the Office of the Secretary
                                                consumption, the party should so                        During this period, the subject articles              and on EDIS.
                                                indicate and provide information                        would be entitled to enter the United                   The authority for the Commission’s
                                                establishing that activities involving                  States under bond, in an amount                       determination is contained in section
                                                other types of entry either are adversely               determined by the Commission and                      337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                affecting it or likely to do so. For                    prescribed by the Secretary of the                    amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part
                                                background, see Certain Devices for                     Treasury. The Commission is therefore                 210 of the Commission’s Rules of
                                                Connecting Computers via Telephone                      interested in receiving submissions                   Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part
                                                Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC                       concerning the amount of the bond that                210.
                                                Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994) (Comm’n                       should be imposed if a remedy is                        By order of the Commission.
                                                Op.). In particular, the written                        ordered.                                                Issued: November 13, 2017.
                                                submissions should address any request                     Written Submissions: Each party’s
                                                                                                                                                              Lisa R. Barton,
                                                for a cease and desist order in the                     written submission must be filed no
                                                                                                        later than close of business on                       Secretary to the Commission.
                                                context of recent Commission opinions,                                                                        [FR Doc. 2017–24927 Filed 11–16–17; 8:45 am]
                                                including those in Certain Arrowheads                   Thursday, November 30, 2017. Reply
                                                with Deploying Blades and Components                    submissions must be filed no later than               BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

                                                Thereof and Packaging Therefor, Inv.                    the close of business on Thursday,
                                                No. 337–TA–977, Comm’n Op. (Apr. 28,                    December 7, 2017. No further
                                                2017) and Certain Electric Skin Care                    submissions on these issues will be                   DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
                                                Devices, Brushes and Chargers Therefor,                 permitted unless otherwise ordered by
                                                                                                        the Commission.                                       Employment and Training
                                                and Kits Containing the Same, Inv. No.                                                                        Administration
                                                                                                           Persons filing written submissions
                                                337–TA–959, Comm’n Op. (Feb. 13,
                                                                                                        must file the original document
                                                2017). Specifically, if Complainant                                                                           Agency Information Collection
                                                                                                        electronically on or before the deadlines
                                                seeks a cease and desist order against a                                                                      Activities; Comment Request;
                                                                                                        stated above and submit 8 true paper
                                                defaulting respondent, the written                                                                            Workforce Flexibility (Workflex) Plan
                                                                                                        copies to the Office of the Secretary by
                                                submissions should respond to the                                                                             Submission and Reporting
                                                                                                        noon the next day pursuant to
                                                following requests:                                                                                           Requirements
                                                                                                        Commission Rule 210.4(f), 19 CFR
                                                  (1) Please identify with citations to the             210.4(f). Submissions should refer to the
                                                record any information regarding                                                                              ACTION:   Notice.
                                                                                                        investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 337–
                                                commercially significant inventory in the               TA–1028’’) in a prominent place on the                SUMMARY:    The Department of Labor
                                                United States as to each respondent against
                                                whom a cease and desist order is sought. If             cover page and/or the first page. (See                (DOL), Employment and Training
                                                Complainant also relies on other significant            Handbook for Electronic Filing                        Administration is soliciting comments
                                                domestic operations that could undercut the             Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/                    concerning a proposed extension for the
                                                remedy provided by an exclusion order,                  secretary/documents/handbook_on_                      authority to conduct the information
                                                please identify with citations to the record            filing_procedures.pdf). Persons with                  collection request (ICR) titled,
                                                such information as to each respondent                  questions regarding filing should                     ‘‘Workforce Flexibility (Workflex) Plan
                                                against whom a cease and desist order is                contact the Secretary, (202) 205–2000.                Submission and Reporting
                                                sought.                                                    Any person desiring to submit a                    Requirements.’’ This comment request
                                                  (2) In relation to the infringing products,
                                                please identify any information in the record,
                                                                                                        document to the Commission in                         is part of continuing Departmental
                                                including allegations in the pleadings, that            confidence must request confidential                  efforts to reduce paperwork and
                                                addresses the existence of any domestic                 treatment. All such requests should be                respondent burden in accordance with
                                                                                                        directed to the Secretary to the                      the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                inventory, any domestic operations, or any
                                                sales-related activity directed at the United           Commission and must include a full                    (PRA).
                                                States for each respondent against whom a               statement of the reasons why the                      DATES: Consideration will be given to all
                                                cease and desist order is sought.                       Commission should grant such                          written comments received by January
                                                   If the Commission contemplates some                  treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents                16, 2018.
                                                form of remedy, it must consider the                    for which confidential treatment by the
                                                effects of that remedy upon the public                  Commission is properly sought will be                   1 All contract personnel will sign appropriate

                                                interest. The factors the Commission                    treated accordingly. All information,                 nondisclosure agreements.



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:32 Nov 16, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00099   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM   17NON1



Document Created: 2017-11-17 05:14:57
Document Modified: 2017-11-17 05:14:57
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactAmanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation82 FR 54413 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR