82 FR 56824 - TSCA Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Standards for Small Manufacturers and Processors; Final Determination
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 229 (November 30, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 229 (November 30, 2017)
| Page Range | 56824-56826 | |
| FR Document | 2017-25822 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 56824-56826] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-25822] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0675; FRL-9968-41] TSCA Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Standards for Small Manufacturers and Processors; Final Determination AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On December 15, 2016, EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register requesting public comment on whether revision to the current size standards for small manufacturers and processors, which are used in connection with reporting regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a), is warranted. This document describes EPA's final determination that revision to the current size standards is warranted. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: Lynne Blake-Hedges, Chemistry, Economics, and Sustainable Strategies Division (7406M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-8807; email address: [email protected]. For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 554-1404; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture or process chemical substances or mixtures. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:Basic Chemical Manufacturers (NAICS code 3251); Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filament Manufacturers (NAICS code 3252); Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturers (NAICS code 3253); Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturers (NAICS code 3255); Other Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturers (NAICS code 3259); and Petroleum Refineries (NAICS code 32411). B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information? The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0675, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566- 0280. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. II. What action is the agency taking? On June 22, 2016, President Obama signed into law the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act which amends the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), the nation's primary chemicals management law. A summary of the new law is available at https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/frank-r-lautenberg-chemical-safety-21st-century-act. This particular action involves revised TSCA section 8(a)(3)(C), which requires EPA, after consultation with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, to review the adequacy of the standards for determining which manufacturers and processors qualify as small manufacturers and processors for purposes of TSCA sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3). (Note that under TSCA section 3(9), manufacture includes import.) TSCA furthermore requires that (after consulting with the Small Business Administration and providing public notice and an opportunity for comment) EPA determine whether revision of the standards is warranted. For the reasons described below, EPA determines that revision of the standards is warranted. In the 1980s, EPA issued standards that are used in identifying which businesses qualify as small manufacturers and processors for purposes of the reporting and recordkeeping rules issued under TSCA section 8(a). Under TSCA section 8(a)(1), small manufacturers and processors are generally exempt from section 8(a) reporting requirements, except in limited cases set forth in TSCA section 8(a)(3). In 1982, EPA finalized standards for determining which manufacturers of a reportable chemical substance qualify as small manufacturers for purposes of the section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Reporting (PAIR) rules, codified in 40 CFR part 712, subpart B. The small manufacturer standard for PAIR rules is found at 40 CFR 712.25(c). In 1988, EPA established general small manufacturer standards for use in other rules issued under TSCA section 8(a) (40 CFR 704.3). For example, these are the standards that now apply to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule (40 CFR part 711). The general standards are somewhat different from the earlier standards that are codified for use in the PAIR rules. The general small manufacturer standards are as follows: Small manufacturer or importer means a manufacturer or importer that meets either of the following standards: 1. First standard. A manufacturer or importer of a substance is small if its total annual sales, when combined with those of its parent company (if any), are less than $40 million. However, if the annual production or importation volume of a particular substance at any individual site owned or controlled by the manufacturer or importer is greater than 45,400 kilograms (100,000 pounds), the manufacturer or importer shall not qualify as small for purposes of reporting on the production or importation of that substance at that site, unless the manufacturer or importer qualifies as small under standard (2) of this definition. 2. Second standard. A manufacturer or importer of a substance is small if its [[Page 56825]] total annual sales, when combined with those of its parent company (if any), are less than $4 million, regardless of the quantity of substances produced or imported by that manufacturer or importer. 3. Inflation index. EPA shall make use of the Producer Price Index for Chemicals and Allied Products, as compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, for purposes of determining the need to adjust the total annual sales values and for determining new sales values when adjustments are made. EPA may adjust the total annual sales values whenever the Agency deems it necessary to do so, provided that the Producer Price Index for Chemicals and Allied Products has changed more than 20 percent since either the most recent previous change in sales values or the date of promulgation of this rule, whichever is later. EPA shall provide Federal Register notification when changing the total annual sales values. Pursuant to authority under section 8(a)(3)(B), certain section 8(a) rules codify slight variations of the general small manufacturer standards at 40 CFR 704.3. (See, e.g., 40 CFR 704.45). Other rules issued under TSCA section 8(a) establish (for use in a particular rule) analogous standards for small processors (See, e.g., 40 CFR 704.33). As an initial step in evaluating whether a change in these current size standards are warranted, EPA reviewed the change in the Producer Price Index (PPI) for Chemicals and Allied Products between 1988 (the year the general size standards at 40 CFR 704.3 were last revised) and 2015 (the most recent year of PPI data available) (Ref. 1). EPA found that the PPI has changed by 129 percent, far exceeding the 20 percent inflation index specified as a level above which EPA may adjust annual sales levels in the current standard if deemed necessary. This change to the PPI is pertinent for both the $4 million annual sales standard and the $40 million threshold used in the combined sales and production standard. Furthermore, among the more than 500 revenue-based size standards set by the Small Business Administration (SBA), the lowest is $5.5 million, and more than 75% of those standards are in excess of $7.5 million. Some revenue-based standards are as high as $38.5 million. Thus, EPA's existing $4 million annual sales standard is an outlier at the low end of this range. Along the same lines, the sales- only size standard EPA recently adopted for the TSCA section 8(a) nanoscale reporting rule is $11 million, significantly larger than $4 million. Because of the magnitude of the increase in the PPI since the last revision of the size standards and because the current annual sales standard is comparatively low given current revenue-based size standards developed by SBA, EPA preliminarily determined that a revision to currently codified size standards is warranted. On December 15, 2016, EPA published its preliminary determination and requested public comment on the adequacy of the current standards and whether revision of the standards is warranted. In addition, EPA consulted with the SBA and received feedback on the consultation from SBA on April 5, 2017. SBA's consultation feedback recommended that EPA ``apply a comprehensive approach that not only evaluates inflation but also examines other important factors, such as the characteristics of firms and industries associated with manufacturing or importation of chemical substances and percentage of firms impacted by the rules, to determine whether or not a revision to the current size standards is warranted.'' EPA reopened the public comment period on May 9, 2017 to give the public an opportunity to review SBA's consultation feedback to inform their comments on EPA's preliminary determination. On May 9, 2017, EPA's preliminary finding and its basis remained the same as in the December 15, 2016 publication in the Federal Register. EPA's decision not to consider a more comprehensive range of factors as recommended in SBA's consultation feedback before taking the current action is appropriate because the current action is limited to determining whether ``revision of the standards'' is warranted or not. See TSCA section 8(a)(3)(C)(ii). (The set of size standards covered by this determination are those that EPA has issued under TSCA section 8(a)(3)(B), pertinent to information collection under TSCA section 8(a).) EPA found that the PPI index changed by a percentage far exceeding the 20 percent inflation index. EPA had previously specified 20 percent as a level above which EPA may adjust annual sales levels in the current standard if deemed necessary. This change in the PPI index (along with the observation that the current annual sales standard is comparatively low given current revenue-based size standards developed by SBA) is a sufficient basis to determine that some revision of the standards is warranted, even if there are other factors that could have supported the same conclusion. EPA notes that the SBA's Office of Advocacy substantively agreed with EPA's preliminary determination (that a revision to the current size standards is warranted) even though it requested EPA to consider additional factors in reaching that conclusion. EPA received a number of comments on its preliminary determination. Most commenters agreed with EPA's preliminary determination that an update is warranted. SBA submitted comments that argued that EPA should have considered more than the second (i.e., the sales-only) standard when making a final determination, such as whether the standard is structured appropriately. This comment is similar to the SBA's recommendation in its consultation feedback that EPA evaluate a broader set of factors related to firm and industry characteristics and percentage of firms impacted by section 8 rules to determine whether or not a revision to the standards is necessary. However, as previously noted, the change in the PPI index (along with the comparative analysis of the current annual sales standard) is a sufficient basis to determine (even if other factors could have supported the same conclusion) that some revision of the standards for small manufacturers and processors is warranted, for both the sales-only and the sales plus production standards. Two commenters questioned whether a revision to the standards is warranted. One of these commenters argued that the standards should not be changed, based on the serious nature of unspecified chemicals of concern. The second commenter argued that a revision to the standards that would result in classifying more manufacturers or processors as small is not warranted because states need to have complete information about chemical use, including volume, location, and toxicity, in order to effectively respond to emergencies and to prioritize resources to address concerns among various chemicals. EPA does not agree that either argument justifies a determination that revision of the standards is not warranted. The first commenter did not explain how chemical risks would be exacerbated by updating the status quo of small manufacturer standards. With regard to the second comment, the outcome of the rulemaking (i.e., whether it would result in exempting more firms from reporting than under the current standards) cannot be known until the rulemaking is complete. Although revising the size standards for inflation could be presumed to increase the number of exempt firms, the second commenter did not explain how such increase would necessarily translate into a loss of information necessary for [[Page 56826]] states to effectively respond to emergencies and prioritize resources. With respect to the need of states to have complete information about the toxicity of particular chemical substances, EPA notes that the size standards at issue in this action only relate to the collection of information under TSCA section 8(a). The primary information collection under TSCA section 8(a) is the Chemical Data Reporting rule, 40 CFR part 711, which collects exposure-related data rather than hazard data. In any event, although the exemption of small businesses from reporting necessarily reduces the amount of chemical information EPA collects, Congress nonetheless decided to provide for an exemption and directed EPA to determine the need for revision. As explained above, EPA believes the currently promulgated standards are clearly outdated with respect to the current understanding of what qualifies a business as small. EPA has not yet proposed any revisions to the size standards; any changes would be established through future notice and comment rulemaking. At that time, public comments regarding the merits of any proposed revisions would be sought by EPA and subsequently addressed. Several commenters also provided their opinions on how the standards should be specifically revised or explained why specific parts of the standards ought to be maintained. For example, SBA commented that, when developing standards, EPA should consider a broad range of factors that may potentially be relevant in the context of TSCA reporting. These factors include barriers to entry, start-up and expansion costs, capital versus labor intensiveness of industries, average firm size (employment and revenue), growth trends, and technological factors. Multiple commenters agreed with SBA's recommendations. Additionally, one commenter argued that the combined sales and production standard should be revised by lowering its production threshold and not changing its $40 million sales threshold. However, the scope of this action is limited to a general determination as to whether some revision to the TSCA small manufacturer and processor standards is warranted. More particular issues (i.e., relating to how the standards ought to be revised) will be addressed in a subsequent rulemaking and are beyond the scope of this action. Although EPA has no obligation to respond to the suggestions for specific revisions submitted as comments on this action, EPA intends to consider these comments as it develops its rulemaking proposal. Members of the public who wish to maintain previously submitted comments or who wish to submit new comments may do so following the publication of EPA's proposal in the Federal Register. EPA will address such comments prior to finalizing any changes to the TSCA size standards. EPA's preliminary determination that a revision to size standards was warranted did not include the size standard for nanoscale materials found at 40 CFR 704.20. See 81 FR 90842 (determination was only with respect to currently codified size standards as of December 15, 2016). EPA promulgated the size standards at 40 CFR 704.20 on January 12, 2017, along with the other provisions of EPA's reporting and recordkeeping rule for nanoscale materials. Concurrent with promulgating the size standards at 40 CFR 704.20, EPA indicated that it would consider the adequacy of the size standards at 40 CFR 704.20 in the course of finalizing this determination under TSCA section 8(a)(3)(C). 82 FR 3650. At this point, EPA has not made a determination as to whether the size standards in the nanotechnology rule warrant revision. EPA will further evaluate the need for any revision as part of the rulemaking to revise the standards identified in this final determination. Based on EPA's preliminary determination, a review of the comments on the preliminary determination, and the feedback from consultation from SBA, EPA is now making a final determination under TSCA section 8(a)(3)(C)(ii) that revision to the TSCA section 8(a) size standards for manufacturers and processors is warranted. III. References The following is a listing of the documents that are specifically referenced in this document. The docket includes these documents and other information considered by EPA, including documents that are referenced within the documents that are included in the docket, even if the referenced document is not physically located in the docket. For assistance in locating these other documents, please consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. ``Producer Price Index, Series WPU06, Chemicals and Allied Products, 1933-2015''. Retrieved November 14, 2016 from http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/srgatet. Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(a). Dated: November 21, 2017. Charlotte Bertrand, Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. [FR Doc. 2017-25822 Filed 11-29-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![56824 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 229 / Thursday, November 30, 2017 / Notices
2017, effective July 13, 2017 to July 13, I. General Information review the adequacy of the standards for
2018. determining which manufacturers and
A. Does this action apply to me?
processors qualify as small
Centers for Disease Control and You may be potentially affected by manufacturers and processors for
Prevention this action if you manufacture or purposes of TSCA sections 8(a)(1) and
Public health exemptions: EPA process chemical substances or 8(a)(3). (Note that under TSCA section
authorized use of pyriproxyfen (a mixtures. The following list of North 3(9), manufacture includes import.)
larvicide) and Beauveria bassiana (a American Industrial Classification TSCA furthermore requires that (after
fungus pathogenic to adult insects) to System (NAICS) codes is not intended consulting with the Small Business
help control Aedes species of to be exhaustive, but rather provides a Administration and providing public
mosquitoes, vectors of the zika virus, in guide to help readers determine whether notice and an opportunity for comment)
Puerto Rico. Effective May 12, 2017 to this document applies to them. EPA determine whether revision of the
May 12, 2018. Potentially affected entities may standards is warranted. For the reasons
include: described below, EPA determines that
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. • Basic Chemical Manufacturers revision of the standards is warranted.
Dated: October 18, 2017. (NAICS code 3251); In the 1980s, EPA issued standards
Michael Goodis, • Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and that are used in identifying which
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filament businesses qualify as small
Pesticide Programs. Manufacturers (NAICS code 3252); manufacturers and processors for
• Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other purposes of the reporting and
[FR Doc. 2017–25831 Filed 11–29–17; 8:45 am]
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturers recordkeeping rules issued under TSCA
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
(NAICS code 3253); section 8(a). Under TSCA section
• Paint, Coating, and Adhesive 8(a)(1), small manufacturers and
Manufacturers (NAICS code 3255); processors are generally exempt from
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
• Other Chemical Product and section 8(a) reporting requirements,
AGENCY
Preparation Manufacturers (NAICS code except in limited cases set forth in
3259); and TSCA section 8(a)(3).
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0675; FRL–9968–41] • Petroleum Refineries (NAICS code In 1982, EPA finalized standards for
32411). determining which manufacturers of a
TSCA Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements; Standards for Small B. How can I get copies of this document reportable chemical substance qualify as
and other related information? small manufacturers for purposes of the
Manufacturers and Processors; Final section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment
Determination The docket for this action, identified Information Reporting (PAIR) rules,
by docket identification (ID) number codified in 40 CFR part 712, subpart B.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0675, is available The small manufacturer standard for
Agency (EPA). at http://www.regulations.gov or at the PAIR rules is found at 40 CFR 712.25(c).
ACTION: Notice. Office of Pollution Prevention and In 1988, EPA established general
Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), small manufacturer standards for use in
SUMMARY: On December 15, 2016, EPA Environmental Protection Agency other rules issued under TSCA section
issued a notice in the Federal Register Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 8(a) (40 CFR 704.3). For example, these
requesting public comment on whether Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 are the standards that now apply to the
revision to the current size standards for Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule (40
small manufacturers and processors, DC. The Public Reading Room is open CFR part 711). The general standards are
which are used in connection with from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday somewhat different from the earlier
reporting regulations under the Toxic through Friday, excluding legal standards that are codified for use in the
Substances Control Act (TSCA) section holidays. The telephone number for the PAIR rules. The general small
8(a), is warranted. This document Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, manufacturer standards are as follows:
describes EPA’s final determination that and the telephone number for the OPPT Small manufacturer or importer
revision to the current size standards is Docket is (202) 566–0280. Please review means a manufacturer or importer that
warranted. the visitor instructions and additional meets either of the following standards:
information about the docket available 1. First standard. A manufacturer or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. importer of a substance is small if its
technical information contact: Lynne total annual sales, when combined with
Blake-Hedges, Chemistry, Economics, II. What action is the agency taking? those of its parent company (if any), are
and Sustainable Strategies Division On June 22, 2016, President Obama less than $40 million. However, if the
(7406M), Office of Pollution Prevention signed into law the Frank R. Lautenberg annual production or importation
and Toxics, Environmental Protection Chemical Safety for the 21st Century volume of a particular substance at any
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Act which amends the Toxic Substance individual site owned or controlled by
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone Control Act (TSCA), the nation’s the manufacturer or importer is greater
number: (202) 564–8807; email address: primary chemicals management law. A than 45,400 kilograms (100,000
blake-hedges.lynne@epa.gov. summary of the new law is available at pounds), the manufacturer or importer
For general information contact: The https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and- shall not qualify as small for purposes
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 managing-chemicals-under-tsca/frank-r- of reporting on the production or
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY lautenberg-chemical-safety-21st- importation of that substance at that
14620; telephone number: (202) 554– century-act. This particular action site, unless the manufacturer or
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@ involves revised TSCA section importer qualifies as small under
epa.gov. 8(a)(3)(C), which requires EPA, after standard (2) of this definition.
consultation with the Administrator of 2. Second standard. A manufacturer
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the Small Business Administration, to or importer of a substance is small if its
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:35 Nov 29, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57053/page/1.svg)
![56826 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 229 / Thursday, November 30, 2017 / Notices
states to effectively respond to proposal. Members of the public who Dated: November 21, 2017.
emergencies and prioritize resources. wish to maintain previously submitted Charlotte Bertrand,
With respect to the need of states to comments or who wish to submit new Acting Principal Deputy Assistant
have complete information about the comments may do so following the Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and
toxicity of particular chemical publication of EPA’s proposal in the Pollution Prevention.
substances, EPA notes that the size Federal Register. EPA will address such [FR Doc. 2017–25822 Filed 11–29–17; 8:45 am]
standards at issue in this action only comments prior to finalizing any BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
relate to the collection of information changes to the TSCA size standards.
under TSCA section 8(a). The primary EPA’s preliminary determination that
information collection under TSCA a revision to size standards was
section 8(a) is the Chemical Data warranted did not include the size FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Reporting rule, 40 CFR part 711, which standard for nanoscale materials found ADVISORY BOARD
collects exposure-related data rather at 40 CFR 704.20. See 81 FR 90842
than hazard data. In any event, although Notice of Request for Comment on the
(determination was only with respect to Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2017 and
the exemption of small businesses from currently codified size standards as of
reporting necessarily reduces the Three-Year Plan
December 15, 2016). EPA promulgated
amount of chemical information EPA
the size standards at 40 CFR 704.20 on AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards
collects, Congress nonetheless decided
January 12, 2017, along with the other Advisory Board.
to provide for an exemption and
provisions of EPA’s reporting and
directed EPA to determine the need for ACTION: Notice.
recordkeeping rule for nanoscale
revision. As explained above, EPA
materials. Concurrent with
believes the currently promulgated Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the
promulgating the size standards at 40
standards are clearly outdated with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
CFR 704.20, EPA indicated that it would
respect to the current understanding of L. 92–463), as amended, and the FASAB
consider the adequacy of the size
what qualifies a business as small. EPA Rules of Procedure, as amended in
standards at 40 CFR 704.20 in the
has not yet proposed any revisions to October 2010, notice is hereby given
the size standards; any changes would course of finalizing this determination
that the Federal Accounting Standards
be established through future notice and under TSCA section 8(a)(3)(C). 82 FR
Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued its
comment rulemaking. At that time, 3650. At this point, EPA has not made
Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2017 and
public comments regarding the merits of a determination as to whether the size
Three-Year Plan.
any proposed revisions would be sought standards in the nanotechnology rule
warrant revision. EPA will further The Annual Report for Fiscal Year
by EPA and subsequently addressed. 2017 and Three-Year Plan is available
evaluate the need for any revision as
Several commenters also provided part of the rulemaking to revise the on the FASAB Web site at http://
their opinions on how the standards standards identified in this final www.fasab.gov/our-annual-reports/.
should be specifically revised or determination. Copies can be obtained by contacting
explained why specific parts of the FASAB at (202) 512–7350.
standards ought to be maintained. For Based on EPA’s preliminary
determination, a review of the Respondents are encouraged to
example, SBA commented that, when comment on the content of the annual
developing standards, EPA should comments on the preliminary
determination, and the feedback from report and FASAB’s project priorities
consider a broad range of factors that for the next three years. Written
may potentially be relevant in the consultation from SBA, EPA is now
making a final determination under comments are requested by January 29,
context of TSCA reporting. These factors 2018, and should be sent to fasab@
include barriers to entry, start-up and TSCA section 8(a)(3)(C)(ii) that revision
to the TSCA section 8(a) size standards fasab.gov or Wendy M. Payne, Executive
expansion costs, capital versus labor Director, Federal Accounting Standards
intensiveness of industries, average firm for manufacturers and processors is
warranted. Advisory Board, 441 G Street NW., Suite
size (employment and revenue), growth 6814, Mailstop 6H19, Washington, DC
trends, and technological factors. III. References 20548.
Multiple commenters agreed with SBA’s
recommendations. Additionally, one The Board is also conducting an
The following is a listing of the
commenter argued that the combined online survey to help in assessing the
documents that are specifically
sales and production standard should be most important priorities for the future.
referenced in this document. The docket
revised by lowering its production The annual planning survey is available
includes these documents and other
threshold and not changing its $40 at https://tell.gao.gov/fasabplanning
information considered by EPA,
million sales threshold. However, the 2017/. The survey closes on November
including documents that are referenced
scope of this action is limited to a 30, 2017.
within the documents that are included
general determination as to whether in the docket, even if the referenced FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
some revision to the TSCA small document is not physically located in Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director,
manufacturer and processor standards is the docket. For assistance in locating 441 G Street NW., Mailstop 6H19,
warranted. More particular issues (i.e., these other documents, please consult Washington, DC 20548, or call (202)
relating to how the standards ought to the technical person listed under FOR 512–7350.
be revised) will be addressed in a FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Authority: Federal Advisory Committee
subsequent rulemaking and are beyond Act, Pub. L. 92–463.
the scope of this action. Although EPA U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
has no obligation to respond to the ‘‘Producer Price Index, Series WPU06, Dated: November 15, 2017.
suggestions for specific revisions Chemicals and Allied Products, 1933– Wendy M. Payne,
submitted as comments on this action, 2015’’. Retrieved November 14, 2016 Executive Director.
EPA intends to consider these from http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/srgatet. [FR Doc. 2017–25819 Filed 11–29–17; 8:45 am]
comments as it develops its rulemaking Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(a). BILLING CODE 1610–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:35 Nov 29, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57053/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-30 00:35:09
Document Modified: 2017-11-30 00:35:09
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Contact | For technical information contact: Lynne Blake-Hedges, Chemistry, Economics, and Sustainable Strategies Division (7406M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-8807; email | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 56824 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR