82 FR 57413 - Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 232 (December 5, 2017)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 232 (December 5, 2017)
| Page Range | 57413-57415 | |
| FR Document | 2017-26147 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 57413-57415] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-26147] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2017-0964] RIN 1625-AA00 Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone on the navigable waters of Oregon Inlet in Dare County, North Carolina in support of construction of the new Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. This temporary safety zone is intended to protect mariners, vessels, and construction crews from the hazards associated with installing the navigation span, and will restrict vessel traffic from the bridge's navigation span as it is under construction by preventing vessel traffic on a portion of Oregon Inlet. Entry of vessels or persons into this safety zone is prohibited. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before December 20, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG- 2017-0964 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, contact Petty Officer Matthew Tyson, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Wilmington, NC; telephone: (910) 772-2221, email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code COTP Captain of the Port II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis On October 10, 2017, the North Carolina Department of Transportation [[Page 57414]] notified the Coast Guard that they will be installing the navigation span of the new Herbert C. Bonner Bridge on January 8 through March 3, 2018, with alternate dates of March 4 through April 15, 2018. The construction will take place over an estimated 33 days during this period. A safety zone is proposed in Oregon Inlet within an area beginning at approximate position 35[deg]46'23'' N., 75[deg]32'18'' W., thence southeast to 35[deg]46'18'' N., 75[deg]32'12'' W., thence southwest to 35[deg]46'16'' N., 75[deg]32'16'' W., thence northwest to 35[deg]46'20'' N., 75[deg]32'23'' W., thence northeast back to the point of origin (NAD 1983) in Dare County, North Carolina. The construction involves crane barges on both sides of the navigation channel and various construction vessels and equipment. The COTP North Carolina has determined that potential safety hazards associated with the construction would be a concern for anyone transiting the Oregon Inlet navigation channel. The purpose of this rule is to protect persons, vessels, and the marine environment on the navigable waters in Oregon Inlet during this construction phase. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone to be enforced from January 8 through March 3, 2018, with alternate dates of March 4 through April 15, 2018. Construction is expected to take place on 33 separate days during this period. The safety zone will be active for 2 hours each of those days, with the exact times announced via Broadcast Notices to Mariners at least 48 hours prior to enforcement. The safety zone will include all navigable waters of Oregon Inlet from approximate position 35[deg]46'23'' N., 75[deg]32'18'' W., thence southeast to 35[deg]46'18'' N., 75[deg]32'12'' W., thence southwest to 35[deg]46'16'' N., 75[deg]32'16'' W., thence northwest to 35[deg]46'20'' N., 75[deg]32'23'' W., thence northeast back to the point of origin, (NAD 1983). This zone is intended to protect persons, vessels, and the marine environment on the navigable waters in Oregon Inlet during this construction phase. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone during the designated times. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document. IV. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, and duration of the proposed safety zone. Vessel traffic will not be allowed to enter or transit a portion of Oregon Inlet during specific two hour periods on 33 separate days from January 8 through March 3, 2018, with alternate dates of March 4 through April 15, 2018. The specific 2 hour period for each work day will be broadcast at least 48 hours in advance and vessels will be able to transit Oregon Inlet at all other times. The Coast Guard will issue a Local Notice to Mariners and transmit a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 regarding the safety zone. This portion of Oregon Inlet has been determined to be a medium to low traffic area at this time of the year. This rule does not allow vessels to request permission to enter the safety zone covering the Oregon Inlet navigation channel during the designated times. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501- 3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. [[Page 57415]] E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety zone lasting for 2 hours on 33 separate days that would prohibit entry into a portion of Oregon Inlet for bridge construction. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. V. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions. We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is published. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04- 1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0964 to read as follows: Sec. 165.T05-0964 Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC. (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of Oregon Inlet, from approximate position 35[deg]46'23'' N., 75[deg]32'18'' W., thence southeast to 35[deg]46'18'' N., 75[deg]32'12'' W., thence southwest to 35[deg]46'16'' N., 75[deg]32'16'' W., thence northwest to 35[deg]46'20'' N., 75[deg]32'23'' W., thence northeast back to the point of origin (NAD 1983) in Dare County, NC. (b) Definitions. As used in this section-- Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer designated by the Captain of the Port North Carolina (COTP) for the enforcement of the safety zone. Captain of the Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina. Construction crews means persons and vessels involved in support of construction. (c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations governing safety zones in Sec. 165.23 apply to the area described in paragraph (a) of this section. (2) With the exception of construction crews, entry into or remaining in this safety zone is prohibited. (3) All vessels within this safety zone when this section becomes effective must depart the zone immediately. (4) The Captain of the Port, North Carolina can be reached through the Coast Guard Sector North Carolina Command Duty Officer, Wilmington, North Carolina at telephone number 910-343-3882. (5) The Coast Guard and designated security vessels enforcing the safety zone can be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65 MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz). (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies. (e) Enforcement Period. This regulation will be enforced from January 8 through March 3, 2018, with alternate dates of March 4 through April 15, 2018. (f) Public Notification. The Coast Guard will notify the public of the specific two hour closures at least 48 hours in advance by transmitting Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16. Dated: November 27, 2017. Bion B. Stewart, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina. [FR Doc. 2017-26147 Filed 12-4-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules 57413
assessment or an environmental impact part 531 of the Code of Federal DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
statement. Regulations as follows: SECURITY
XV. Executive Order 13211, Energy PART 531—WAGE PAYMENTS UNDER Coast Guard
Supply THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT
This proposed rule is not subject to OF 1938 33 CFR Part 165
Executive Order 13211. It will not have [Docket Number USCG–2017–0964]
a significant adverse effect on the ■ 1. The authority citation for part 531
supply, distribution, or use of energy. continues to read as follows: RIN 1625–AA00
Authority: Sec. 3(m), 52 Stat. 1060; sec. 2,
XVI. Executive Order 12630, 75 Stat. 65; sec. 101, 80 Stat. 830; sec. 29(B), Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare
Constitutionally Protected Property 88 Stat. 55, Pub. L. 93–259; Pub. L. 95–151, County, NC
Rights 29 U.S.C. 203(m) and (t); Pub. L. 104–188,
2105(b); Pub. L. 110–28, 121 Stat. 112.
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
This proposed rule is not subject to ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Executive Order 12630 because it does ■ 2. Revise § 531.52 to read as follows:
not involve implementation of a policy SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
§ 531.52 General characteristics of ‘‘tips.’’ establish a temporary safety zone on the
that has takings implications or that
could impose limitations on private A tip is a sum presented by a navigable waters of Oregon Inlet in Dare
property use. customer as a gift or gratuity in County, North Carolina in support of
recognition of some service performed construction of the new Herbert C.
XVII. Executive Order 12988, Civil for him. It is to be distinguished from Bonner Bridge. This temporary safety
Justice Reform Analysis payment of a charge, if any, made for zone is intended to protect mariners,
This proposed rule was drafted and the service. Whether a tip is to be given, vessels, and construction crews from the
reviewed in accordance with Executive and its amount, are matters determined hazards associated with installing the
Order 12988 and will not unduly solely by the customer, who has the navigation span, and will restrict vessel
burden the Federal court system. The right to determine who shall be the traffic from the bridge’s navigation span
proposed rule was: (1) Reviewed to recipient of the gratuity. An employer as it is under construction by preventing
eliminate drafting errors and that takes a tip credit is prohibited from vessel traffic on a portion of Oregon
ambiguities; (2) written to minimize using an employee’s tips for any reason Inlet. Entry of vessels or persons into
litigation; and (3) written to provide a other than that which is statutorily this safety zone is prohibited. We invite
clear legal standard for affected conduct permitted in section 3(m): As a credit your comments on this proposed
and to promote burden reduction. against its minimum wage obligations to rulemaking.
the employee, or in furtherance of a
XVIII. Summary of Proposed Changes DATES: Comments and related material
valid tip pool. Only tips actually
must be received by the Coast Guard on
The Department proposes to remove received by an employee as money
or before December 20, 2017.
or amend the portions of §§ 531.52, belonging to the employee may be
counted in determining whether the ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
531.54, and 531.59 that impose identified by docket number USCG–
restrictions on employers that pay a person is a ‘‘tipped employee’’ within
the meaning of the Act and in applying 2017–0964 using the Federal
direct cash wage of least the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://
minimum wage and do not claim the the provisions of section 3(m) which
govern wage credits for tips. www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
section 3(m) tip credit. The proposed Participation and Request for
rule deletes the fourth sentence of * * * * * Comments’’ portion of the
section 531.52, which currently states ■ 3. Revise the last sentence of § 531.54
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
that ‘‘[t]ips are the property of the to read as follows: further instructions on submitting
employee whether or not the employer comments.
has taken a tip credit under section 3(m) § 531.54 Tip pooling.
of the FLSA.’’ The proposed rule also * * * However, an employer that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
revises the fifth sentence of sections takes a tip credit must notify its you have questions about this proposed
531.52, the last sentence of section employees of any required tip pool rulemaking, contact Petty Officer
531.54, and the final sentence of section contribution amount, may only take a Matthew Tyson, Waterways
531.59(b) to remove language placing tip credit for the amount of tips each Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
restrictions on an employer’s use of tips employee ultimately receives, and may Sector North Carolina, Wilmington, NC;
when that employer has not taken a tip not retain any of the employees’ tips for telephone: (910) 772–2221, email:
credit while retaining language that any other purpose. Matthew.I.Tyson@uscg.mil.
reflects the statutory restrictions on an ■ 4. In § 531.59, revise the last sentence SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
employer’s use of tips received by its of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
I. Table of Abbreviations
employees when it does take a tip
§ 531.59 The tip wage credit. CFR Code of Federal Regulations
credit.
* * * * * DHS Department of Homeland Security
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 531 (b) * * * With the exception of tips FR Federal Register
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
contributed to a valid tip pool as NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Employment, Labor, Minimum wages, § Section
Wages. described in § 531.54, the tip credit
U.S.C. United States Code
provisions of section 3(m) also require COTP Captain of the Port
Bryan L. Jarrett, employers that take a tip credit to
Acting Administrator, Wage and Hour permit employees to retain all tips II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Division. received by the employee. Basis
For the reasons set forth above, the [FR Doc. 2017–25802 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am] On October 10, 2017, the North
Department proposes to amend Title 29, BILLING CODE 4510–27–P Carolina Department of Transportation
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Dec 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM 05DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57645/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules 57415
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act document to which each comment warrant, or petty officer designated by
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act applies, and provide a reason for each the Captain of the Port North Carolina
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires suggestion or recommendation. (COTP) for the enforcement of the safety
Federal agencies to assess the effects of We encourage you to submit zone.
their discretionary regulatory actions. In comments through the Federal Captain of the Port means the
particular, the Act addresses actions eRulemaking Portal at http:// Commander, Sector North Carolina.
that may result in the expenditure by a www.regulations.gov. If your material Construction crews means persons
State, local, or tribal government, in the cannot be submitted using http:// and vessels involved in support of
aggregate, or by the private sector of www.regulations.gov, contact the person construction.
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION (c) Regulations. (1) The general
more in any one year. Though this CONTACT section of this document for regulations governing safety zones in
proposed rule would not result in such alternate instructions. § 165.23 apply to the area described in
an expenditure, we do discuss the We accept anonymous comments. All paragraph (a) of this section.
effects of this rule elsewhere in this comments received will be posted (2) With the exception of construction
preamble. without change to http:// crews, entry into or remaining in this
www.regulations.gov and will include safety zone is prohibited.
F. Environment any personal information you have (3) All vessels within this safety zone
We have analyzed this proposed rule provided. For more about privacy and when this section becomes effective
under Department of Homeland the docket, visit http:// must depart the zone immediately.
Security Management Directive 023–01 www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. (4) The Captain of the Port, North
and Commandant Instruction Documents mentioned in this NPRM Carolina can be reached through the
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast as being available in the docket, and all Coast Guard Sector North Carolina
Guard in complying with the National public comments, will be in our online Command Duty Officer, Wilmington,
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 docket at http://www.regulations.gov North Carolina at telephone number
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a and can be viewed by following that 910–343–3882.
preliminary determination that this Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if (5) The Coast Guard and designated
action is one of a category of actions that you go to the online docket and sign up security vessels enforcing the safety
do not individually or cumulatively for email alerts, you will be notified zone can be contacted on VHF–FM
have a significant effect on the human when comments are posted or a final marine band radio channel 13 (165.65
environment. This proposed rule rule is published. MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
involves a safety zone lasting for 2 hours (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
on 33 separate days that would prohibit Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
entry into a portion of Oregon Inlet for Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation enforcement of the safety zone by
bridge construction. Normally such (water), Reporting and recordkeeping Federal, State, and local agencies.
actions are categorically excluded from requirements, Security measures, (e) Enforcement Period. This
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Waterways. regulation will be enforced from January
Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction For the reasons discussed in the 8 through March 3, 2018, with alternate
M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to dates of March 4 through April 15, 2018.
Environmental Consideration amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: (f) Public Notification. The Coast
supporting this determination is Guard will notify the public of the
available in the docket where indicated PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION specific two hour closures at least 48
under ADDRESSES. We seek any AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS hours in advance by transmitting
comments or information that may lead Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
to the discovery of a significant ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows: FM marine channel 16.
environmental impact from this
Dated: November 27, 2017.
proposed rule. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Bion B. Stewart,
G. Protest Activities Department of Homeland Security Delegation Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
The Coast Guard respects the First No. 0170.1. Port North Carolina.
Amendment rights of protesters. ■ 2. Add § 165.T05–0964 to read as [FR Doc. 2017–26147 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am]
Protesters are asked to contact the follows: BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to § 165.T05–0964 Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet,
coordinate protest activities so that your Dare County, NC.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
message can be received without (a) Location. The following area is a AGENCY
jeopardizing the safety or security of safety zone: All navigable waters of
people, places, or vessels. Oregon Inlet, from approximate position 40 CFR Part 52
35°46′23″ N., 75°32′18″ W., thence
V. Public Participation and Request for southeast to 35°46′18″ N., 75°32′12″ W., [EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0590; FRL–9971–59-
Comments thence southwest to 35°46′16″ N., Region 1]
We view public participation as 75°32′16″ W., thence northwest to
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Air Plan Approval; Massachusetts;
essential to effective rulemaking, and 35°46′20″ N., 75°32′23″ W., thence Logan Airport Parking Freeze
will consider all comments and material northeast back to the point of origin
received during the comment period. (NAD 1983) in Dare County, NC. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Your comment can help shape the (b) Definitions. As used in this Agency.
outcome of this rulemaking. If you section— ACTION: Proposed rule.
submit a comment, please include the Designated representative means a
docket number for this rulemaking, Coast Guard Patrol Commander, SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
indicate the specific section of this including a Coast Guard commissioned, Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Dec 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM 05DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57645/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-04 23:45:09
Document Modified: 2017-12-04 23:45:09
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before December 20, 2017. | |
| Contact | If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, contact Petty Officer Matthew Tyson, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Wilmington, NC; telephone: (910) 772-2221, email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 57413 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA00 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR