82 FR 57415 - Air Plan Approval; Massachusetts; Logan Airport Parking Freeze
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 232 (December 5, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 232 (December 5, 2017)
| Page Range | 57415-57418 | |
| FR Document | 2017-26182 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 57415-57418] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-26182] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0590; FRL-9971-59-Region 1] Air Plan Approval; Massachusetts; Logan Airport Parking Freeze AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a [[Page 57416]] State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This SIP revision increases the total number of commercial parking spaces allowed in the Logan Airport Parking Freeze Area by 5,000 parking spaces. The intended effect of this action is to reduce carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxide (NOX ) emissions by reducing the increased vehicle miles traveled (VMT) resulting from insufficient available parking. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 4, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01- OAR-2017-0590 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne McWilliams, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109--3912, telephone number: (617) 918-1697, email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Table of Contents I. Background II. State Submittal III. EPA's Assessment of the State Submittal IV. Proposed Action V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background Since 1975, Boston Logan International Airport (Logan Airport) has been subject to a freeze on the number of commercial parking spaces available for use by Logan Airport travelers and visitors. In the mid- seventies, EPA developed the Logan Parking Freeze as part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce air pollution caused by automobile emissions. The goal was to achieve the ozone and CO National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) established by EPA under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Logan Airport Parking Freeze was reaffirmed and committed to as a Reasonable Available Control Measure (RACM) in the 1979 and 1982 State Implementation Plan revisions required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977. Through the 1979 and 1982 SIP revisions, the Commonwealth incorporated the Federal Implementation Plan's parking freeze provisions by reference, committing the Commonwealth to implement and enforce the parking freeze as a state regulation, 310 Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR) 7.30 Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport)/Logan Airport Parking Freeze, as well as Federal law. In 1989, the Logan Airport Parking Freeze was amended and the East Boston Parking Freeze was adopted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Unlike the 1975 Logan Freeze, which targeted only commercial parking, the 1989 state action limited and regulated the management of all major airport-related parking in the Logan Airport and East Boston Parking Freeze areas. The parking supply at Logan Airport was capped at 19,315 parking spaces. In addition, Logan-related park-and-fly and rental car parking spaces in East Boston were capped at existing levels. On April 26, 1991, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) certified the parking freeze numbers for the East Boston Parking Freeze area at 4,012 rental motor vehicle parking spaces and 2,475 park-and-fly parking spaces. EPA approved the Logan Airport Parking Freeze and East Boston Parking Freeze amendments into the Massachusetts SIP on March 16, 1993. See 58 FR 14153-14157. The Logan Airport and East Boston Parking Freezes were designed to meet the following objectives: Mitigating the traffic-related air quality impacts of airport access on both a regional and neighborhood level; reducing the number of vehicle trips (i.e., employee and air traveler drop-off/pick up trips) by providing a mix of on-airport parking and off-airport satellite parking centers outside of the parking freeze area; managing the parking supply for Logan to stabilize overall ground access; and developing a unified access management plan for Logan Airport. One of the goals of the current Logan Airport Parking Freeze and East Boston Parking Freeze is to encourage the relocation of park-and-fly parking spaces from the East Boston neighborhoods to reduce localized traffic and air quality impacts. On March 21, 2001, EPA approved revisions to 310 CMR 7.30 Massport/ Logan Airport Parking Freeze and 310 CMR 7.31 City of Boston/East Boston Parking Freeze which allow the permanent relocation of certain categories of parking spaces from the East Boston Parking Freeze area inventory to the Logan Airport Parking Freeze area. See 66 FR 14318. One of the goals of the amendments was to encourage the relocation of the park-and-fly spaces from the East Boston neighborhoods, reducing localized traffic and air quality impacts. According to the most recent Logan Airport Spaces Inventory, the number of existing Total Parking Freeze Spaces is 21,088. In the Massport Policy Memorandum submitted by MassDEP,\1\ Massport details how parking is becoming more constrained at Logan Airport. Since 1975, there has been a 220% increase in passengers at Logan, but only an 80% increase in Logan's commercial parking supply. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Massport Policy Memorandum submitted to MassDEP in a letter dated June 6, 2016 can be found in the docket for this rulemaking. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. State Submittal On July 13, 2017, MassDEP submitted amendments to 310 CMR 7.30 Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze as a formal revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan (SIP). Revised 310 CMR 7.30 increases the total number of commercial spaces in the Logan Parking Freeze area by 5,000 spaces to a total of 26,088. In the event that the remaining 702 park-and-fly spaces in the East Boston Parking Freeze cap were converted to commercial spaces at Logan Airport in the future, the maximum total number of spaces permitted would be 26,790. The revision also requires Massport to complete the following studies within 24 months of June 30, 2017: (1) Potential [[Page 57417]] improvements to high occupancy vehicle access to Logan; (2) a cost and pricing assessment for different modes of transportation to and from Logan in order to generate revenue for the promotion of HOV use by airport travelers and visitors; and (3) the feasibility and effectiveness of potential operational measures to reduce non-HOV pick- up/drop-off modes of transportation to Logan Airport. Finally, the revision allows Massport to satisfy its annual reporting requirements through its submission of annual Environmental Data Reports or similar airport-wide documents under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). III. EPA's Assessment of the State Submittal The Technical Analysis submitted by MassDEP \2\ demonstrates the current insufficient parking at Logan Airport. In 2014, Massport diverted or valet-parked passenger vehicles on 103 out of 260 working days.\3\ On such days, vehicles are diverted to other on-airport facilities or to off-site facilities such as Suffolk Downs, or vehicles are valet-parked, stacked at parking facilities or at other on-airport locations. Such operations are inconvenient to passengers, increases VMT at the airport, and has potential long-term ramifications for future mode choice. Passengers who are unable to park at Logan Airport are more likely to use pick-up/drop-off modes in the future. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ ``Technical Analysis'' prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin (VHB) dated December 11, 2015 listed as Exhibit B is available in the docket for this rulemaking. \3\ It should be noted that Massport continued to be in full compliance with the Logan Airport Parking Freeze throughout 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Technical Analysis concludes that building more parking spaces meets the current and future parking demand. Parking on site results in fewer trips than drop-off/pick-up modes per air passenger. The air quality analysis shows that emissions of VOC, NOX , and CO2 are reduced by 20-25 percent if additional on-airport parking is built compared to a no build scenario.\4\ In addition, MassDEP emphasizes that any new parking garage built as a consequence of the revised regulation would be subject to review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), which would require Massport to submit and review an Environmental Notification Report (ENR) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Massport would also be required to commit, through the MEPA Section 61 Findings, to additional mitigation measures with respect to the garage's environmental impacts. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Section VII. Analysis of Vehicle Emissions Resulting from VMT Changes of the ``Technical Analysis.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(l) provides that EPA shall not approve any implementation plan revision if it would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the CAA, i.e. demonstrate anti-backsliding. The Massport/Logan Parking Freeze was originally implemented to reduce mobile source emissions in order to achieve the CO and Ozone NAAQS. Massachusetts is currently meeting both standards.\5\ However, the current constrained parking encourages more people to choose drop-off/pick-up travel modes, which increases the vehicle miles traveled and air emissions. The submitted amendment will result in reduced vehicle trips and thereby reduce air emissions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For the most recent air quality design values, see www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-design-values. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- MassDEP has demonstrated that the addition of 5,000 parking spaces to the Logan Airport Freeze area will result in a decrease in VMT which in turn will reduce VOC, NOX and CO air emissions. EPA proposes to find that the revisions to 310 CMR 7.30 meet the requirements of CAA section 110(l). In addition, EPA proposes to approve revised 310 CMR 7.30 into the SIP because it will strengthen the SIP by reducing pollutant emissions. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this notice or on other relevant matters. These comments will be considered before taking final action. Interested parties may participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to this proposed rule by following the instructions listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal Register. IV. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve and incorporate into the Massachusetts SIP revised 310 CMR 7.30 Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze submitted on July 13, 2017. The revision increases the total number of commercial parking spaces allowed in the Logan Airport Parking Freeze Area by 5,000 parking spaces. V. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference 310 CMR 7.30 Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through http://www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible [[Page 57418]] methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: November 13, 2017. Deborah A. Szaro, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England. [FR Doc. 2017-26182 Filed 12-4-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules 57415
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act document to which each comment warrant, or petty officer designated by
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act applies, and provide a reason for each the Captain of the Port North Carolina
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires suggestion or recommendation. (COTP) for the enforcement of the safety
Federal agencies to assess the effects of We encourage you to submit zone.
their discretionary regulatory actions. In comments through the Federal Captain of the Port means the
particular, the Act addresses actions eRulemaking Portal at http:// Commander, Sector North Carolina.
that may result in the expenditure by a www.regulations.gov. If your material Construction crews means persons
State, local, or tribal government, in the cannot be submitted using http:// and vessels involved in support of
aggregate, or by the private sector of www.regulations.gov, contact the person construction.
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION (c) Regulations. (1) The general
more in any one year. Though this CONTACT section of this document for regulations governing safety zones in
proposed rule would not result in such alternate instructions. § 165.23 apply to the area described in
an expenditure, we do discuss the We accept anonymous comments. All paragraph (a) of this section.
effects of this rule elsewhere in this comments received will be posted (2) With the exception of construction
preamble. without change to http:// crews, entry into or remaining in this
www.regulations.gov and will include safety zone is prohibited.
F. Environment any personal information you have (3) All vessels within this safety zone
We have analyzed this proposed rule provided. For more about privacy and when this section becomes effective
under Department of Homeland the docket, visit http:// must depart the zone immediately.
Security Management Directive 023–01 www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. (4) The Captain of the Port, North
and Commandant Instruction Documents mentioned in this NPRM Carolina can be reached through the
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast as being available in the docket, and all Coast Guard Sector North Carolina
Guard in complying with the National public comments, will be in our online Command Duty Officer, Wilmington,
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 docket at http://www.regulations.gov North Carolina at telephone number
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a and can be viewed by following that 910–343–3882.
preliminary determination that this Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if (5) The Coast Guard and designated
action is one of a category of actions that you go to the online docket and sign up security vessels enforcing the safety
do not individually or cumulatively for email alerts, you will be notified zone can be contacted on VHF–FM
have a significant effect on the human when comments are posted or a final marine band radio channel 13 (165.65
environment. This proposed rule rule is published. MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
involves a safety zone lasting for 2 hours (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
on 33 separate days that would prohibit Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
entry into a portion of Oregon Inlet for Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation enforcement of the safety zone by
bridge construction. Normally such (water), Reporting and recordkeeping Federal, State, and local agencies.
actions are categorically excluded from requirements, Security measures, (e) Enforcement Period. This
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Waterways. regulation will be enforced from January
Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction For the reasons discussed in the 8 through March 3, 2018, with alternate
M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to dates of March 4 through April 15, 2018.
Environmental Consideration amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: (f) Public Notification. The Coast
supporting this determination is Guard will notify the public of the
available in the docket where indicated PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION specific two hour closures at least 48
under ADDRESSES. We seek any AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS hours in advance by transmitting
comments or information that may lead Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
to the discovery of a significant ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows: FM marine channel 16.
environmental impact from this
Dated: November 27, 2017.
proposed rule. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Bion B. Stewart,
G. Protest Activities Department of Homeland Security Delegation Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
The Coast Guard respects the First No. 0170.1. Port North Carolina.
Amendment rights of protesters. ■ 2. Add § 165.T05–0964 to read as [FR Doc. 2017–26147 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am]
Protesters are asked to contact the follows: BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to § 165.T05–0964 Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet,
coordinate protest activities so that your Dare County, NC.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
message can be received without (a) Location. The following area is a AGENCY
jeopardizing the safety or security of safety zone: All navigable waters of
people, places, or vessels. Oregon Inlet, from approximate position 40 CFR Part 52
35°46′23″ N., 75°32′18″ W., thence
V. Public Participation and Request for southeast to 35°46′18″ N., 75°32′12″ W., [EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0590; FRL–9971–59-
Comments thence southwest to 35°46′16″ N., Region 1]
We view public participation as 75°32′16″ W., thence northwest to
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Air Plan Approval; Massachusetts;
essential to effective rulemaking, and 35°46′20″ N., 75°32′23″ W., thence Logan Airport Parking Freeze
will consider all comments and material northeast back to the point of origin
received during the comment period. (NAD 1983) in Dare County, NC. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Your comment can help shape the (b) Definitions. As used in this Agency.
outcome of this rulemaking. If you section— ACTION: Proposed rule.
submit a comment, please include the Designated representative means a
docket number for this rulemaking, Coast Guard Patrol Commander, SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
indicate the specific section of this including a Coast Guard commissioned, Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Dec 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM 05DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57647/page/1.svg)
![57418 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
methods, under Executive Order 12898 state implementation plan (SIP) revision INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). submitted by the State of West Virginia. full EPA public comment policy,
In addition, the SIP is not approved This revision pertains to the removal of information about CBI or multimedia
to apply on any Indian reservation land source-specific SIP requirements for the submissions, and general guidance on
or in any other area where EPA or an following five facilities in West Virginia making effective comments, please visit
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a that have permanently shutdown: http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Mountaineer Carbon Company; commenting-epa-dockets.
Indian country, the rule does not have Standard Lafarge; Follansbee Steel FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
tribal implications and will not impose Corporation; International Mill Service, Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
substantial direct costs on tribal Inc.; and Columbian Chemicals email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
governments or preempt tribal law as Company. These sources have
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 permanently ceased operation;
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). therefore, SIP requirements for these I. Background
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 sources are obsolete and no longer
The West Virginia SIP at 40 Code of
necessary for attaining and maintaining
Environmental protection, Air Federal Regulations (CFR) part 52,
the national ambient air quality
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, subpart XX, § 52.2520(d) contains
standards (NAAQS). This action is being
Incorporation by reference, source-specific requirements, which
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, were incorporated into the West
DATES: Written comments must be Virginia SIP over the course of many
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
received on or before January 4, 2018. years to allow the State to demonstrate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, attainment with various NAAQS.
organic compounds. identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03– Subsequently, several of these sources
OAR–2017–0555 at http:// have permanently ceased operation
Dated: November 13, 2017. www.regulations.gov, or via email to rendering source-specific requirements
Deborah A. Szaro, pino.maria@epa.gov. For comments for these facilities obsolete.
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the SIP revisions pertaining to the
England. online instructions for submitting removal of obsolete SIP requirements for
[FR Doc. 2017–26182 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am] comments. Once submitted, comments sources that have permanently
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P cannot be edited or removed from shutdown are considered
Regulations.gov. For either manner of administrative, non-substantive
submission, EPA may publish any changes. If a source has permanently
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION comment received to its public docket. shutdown, the emissions are
AGENCY Do not submit electronically any permanently reduced to zero, so
information you consider to be removing source-specific SIP
40 CFR Part 52
confidential business information (CBI) requirements for that source will not
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0555; FRL–9971–57– or other information whose disclosure is interfere with attainment and
Region 3] restricted by statute. Multimedia maintenance of any NAAQS, reasonable
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be further progress or any other applicable
Approval and Promulgation of Air accompanied by a written comment. CAA requirement. See CAA section
Quality Implementation Plans; West The written comment is considered the 110(l).
Virginia; Removal of Source-Specific official comment and should include
Requirements for Permanently discussion of all points you wish to II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Shutdown Facilities make. EPA will generally not consider Analysis
AGENCY: Environmental Protection comments or comment contents located On August 25, 2017, West Virginia
Agency (EPA). outside of the primary submission (i.e. submitted a SIP revision requesting that
ACTION: Proposed rule. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing the consent orders for the sources listed
system). For additional submission in Table 1 be removed from the West
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection methods, please contact the person Virginia SIP located at 40 CFR part 52,
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a identified in the FOR FURTHER subpart XX, § 52.2520(d).
TABLE 1—SOURCE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL FROM THE WEST VIRGINIA SIP
EPA Approval date/
State effective
Source name Order Federal Register (FR)
date citation
Mountaineer Carbon Company ............................ Consent Order ...................................................... 7/2/82 9/1/82,
47 FR 38532
Standard Lafarge .................................................. Consent Order ...................................................... 11/14/91 7/25/94,
CO–SIP–91–30 .................................................... 59 FR 37696
Follansbee Steel Corporation ............................... Consent Order ...................................................... 11/14/91 7/25/94,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
CO–SIP–91–31 .................................................... 59 FR 37696
International Mill Service, Inc ............................... Consent Order ...................................................... 11/14/91 7/25/94,
CO–SIP–91–33 .................................................... 59 FR 37696
Columbian Chemicals Company .......................... Consent Order ...................................................... 1/31/00 8/2/00,
CO–SIP–2000–3 .................................................. 65 FR 47339
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Dec 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM 05DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57647/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-04 23:45:28
Document Modified: 2017-12-04 23:45:28
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before January 4, 2018. | |
| Contact | Anne McWilliams, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109--3912, telephone number: (617) 918-1697, email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 57415 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR