82 FR 57581 - Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 233 (December 6, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 233 (December 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 57581-57583 | |
| FR Document | 2017-26295 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 57581-57583] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-26295] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-201-844] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico, covering the period November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. The review covers one mandatory respondent, Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V. (Deacero), and 12 non-selected companies. We preliminarily determine that Deacero did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable December 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3692. Background On January 13, 2017, the Department published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping order on rebar from Mexico.\1\ The Department initiated this administrative review covering 13 companies.\2\ On July 11, 2017, the Department issued a memorandum extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of the instant administrative review from August 2, 2017 to October 2, 2017.\3\ On September 25, 2017, the Department fully extended the deadline to November 30, 2017.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 294 (January 13, 2017). \2\ We initiated a review of the following 13 companies: Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Simec Orge S.A. de C.V.; Industrias CH; Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V.; ArcelorMittal Lazaro Cardenas S.A. de C.V.; Cia Siderurgica De California S.A. de C.V.; Siderurgica Tultitlan S.A. de C.V.; Talleres y Aceros, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V.; AceroMex S.A.; ArcelorMittal Celaya, S.A. de C.V.; and ArcelorMittal Cordoba S.A. de C.V. \3\ See Memorandum, titled ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2015-2016,'' dated July 11, 2017. \4\ See Memorandum, titled ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2015-2016,'' dated September 25, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable under items 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may also enter under other Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) numbers including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6085, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 57582]] Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On January 19, 2017, Grupo Simec and Orge S.A. de C.V. (Grupo Simec) stated that it had no exports or sales, and no entries for consumption of subject merchandise into the United States during the POR. On February 12, 2017, ArcelorMittal Lazaro Cardenas, SA. de CV. (which became ArcelorMittal Mexico, S.A, de CV. on March 31, 2014), ArcelorMittal Celaya, SA. de CV., and ArcelorMittal Cordoba, SA. de CV. (collectively, Arcelor Mittal) submitted a no shipment letter certification. In response to the non-shipment claims of Grupo Simec and Arcelor Mittal, the Department issued a no-shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requesting that it review Grupo Simec's and Arcelor Mittal's no-shipment claims. CBP did not report that it had any information to contradict these claims of no shipments during the POR. Given that Grupo Simec and Arcelor Mittal certified that they made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, and there is no information calling their claims into question, we preliminarily determine that Grupo Simec and Arcelor Mittal did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. Consistent with the Department's practice, we will not rescind the review with respect to Grupo Simec and Arcelor Mittal but, rather, will complete the review and issue instructions to CBP based on the final results.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 51306, 51307 (August 28, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price or export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum dated concurrently with this notice and hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily calculated a dumping margin of zero percent for Deacero. We are applying to the non-selected companies the rates calculated for the mandatory respondent in these preliminary results, as referenced below.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer and/or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Deacero................................................. 0.00 Industrias CH........................................... 0.00 Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V............................. 0.00 Cia Siderurgica De California, S.A. de C.V.............. 0.00 Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V............................... 0.00 AceroMex S.A............................................ 0.00 Siderurgica Tultitlan S.A. de C.V....................... 0.00 Talleres y Aceros, S.A. de C.V.......................... 0.00 Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V............................. 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rate Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\8\ If the weighted-average dumping margin for Deacero is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\9\ The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review where applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b). \9\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012); 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with the Department's ``automatic assessment'' practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which they did not know that their merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 20.58 percent, the all- others rate established in the [[Page 57583]] antidumping investigation.\10\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\11\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\12\ Parties who submit comments are requested to submit: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\13\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system, and an electronically filed request must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days of publication of this notice.\14\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.\15\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 213(h)(2), the Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case briefs, within 120 days after issuance of these preliminary results.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See section 75l(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent assessment of the antidumping duties by the amount of antidumping duties reimbursed. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: November 30, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Extension of Preliminary Results 4. Scope of the Order 5. Duty Absorption 6. Allegation of Particular Market Situation 7. Margin for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 8. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 9. Discussion of Methodology Date of Sale Comparisons to Normal Value Product Comparisons Determination of Comparison Method Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis Constructed Export Price Normal Value A. Home Market Viability B. Level of Trade C. Sales to Affiliated Customers D. Cost of Production Analysis 1. Calculation of Cost of Production (COP) 2. Test of Home Market Prices 3. Results of the COP Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices F. Currency Conversion Currency Conversion 10. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-26295 Filed 12-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Notices 57581
date of publication of this notice. Dated: November 30, 2017. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised Gary Taverman, Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
in the case briefs, may be filed no later Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3692.
than five days after the date for filing and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
Background
case briefs.18 Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this duties of the Assistant Secretary of On January 13, 2017, the Department
proceeding are encouraged to submit Enforcement and Compliance. published a notice of initiation of an
with each argument: (1) A statement of Appendix administrative review of the
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the antidumping order on rebar from
argument; and (3) a table of List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Mexico.1 The Department initiated this
Decision Memorandum administrative review covering 13
authorities.19 Case and rebuttal briefs
should be filed using ACCESS.20 Summary companies.2 On July 11, 2017, the
Background Department issued a memorandum
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), Scope of the Order
interested parties who wish to request a extending the time period for issuing
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review the preliminary results of the instant
hearing must submit a written request to Preliminary Determination of No Shipments administrative review from August 2,
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Non-Selected Respondents
2017 to October 2, 2017.3 On September
and Compliance, filed electronically via Methodology
Use of Facts Otherwise Available 25, 2017, the Department fully extended
ACCESS. An electronically filed
Fair Value Comparisons the deadline to November 30, 2017.4
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by the Department’s Product Comparisons Scope of the Order
Date of Sale
electronic records system, ACCESS, by Imports covered by the order are
Level of Trade
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days Constructed Export Price shipments of steel concrete reinforcing
after the date of publication of this Normal Value bar imported in either straight length or
notice.21 Requests should contain: (1) Cost of Production coil form (rebar) regardless of
The party’s name, address, and Calculation of Normal Value Based on metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade.
telephone number; (2) the number of Comparison Market Prices The merchandise subject to review is
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be Currency Conversion currently classifiable under items
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing Recommendation
7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and
will be limited to those raised in the [FR Doc. 2017–26300 Filed 12–5–17; 8:45 am] 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise
respective case briefs. If a request for a BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P may also enter under other Harmonized
hearing is made, parties will be notified Tariff Schedule of the United States
of the date and time of the hearing to be (HTSUS) numbers including
held at the U.S. Department of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000,
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018,
NW., Washington, DC 20230. International Trade Administration
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045,
Unless the deadline is extended [A–201–844] 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001,
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6085,
Department intends to issue the final Mexico: Preliminary Results of 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000.
results of this administrative review, Antidumping Duty Administrative Although the HTSUS subheadings are
including the results of its analysis of Review and Preliminary Determination provided for convenience and customs
the issues raised in all written case of No Shipments; 2015–2016 purposes, the written description of the
briefs, within 120 days after the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, merchandise subject to the order is
issuance of these preliminary results. International Trade Administration, dispositive.5
Notification to Importers Department of Commerce. 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
SUMMARY: In response to requests from Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of interested parties, the Department of 294 (January 13, 2017).
their responsibility under 19 CFR Commerce (the Department) is 2 We initiated a review of the following 13
conducting an administrative review of companies: Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Grupo Acerero
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Simec Orge S.A. de C.V.;
regarding the reimbursement of the antidumping duty order on steel Industrias CH; Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V.;
antidumping duties prior to liquidation concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from ArcelorMittal Lazaro Cardenas S.A. de C.V.; Cia
of the relevant entries during this Mexico, covering the period November Siderurgica De California S.A. de C.V.; Siderurgica
1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. The Tultitlan S.A. de C.V.; Talleres y Aceros, S.A. de
review period. Failure to comply with C.V.; Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V.; AceroMex S.A.;
this requirement could result in the review covers one mandatory ArcelorMittal Celaya, S.A. de C.V.; and
Department’s presumption that respondent, Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V. ArcelorMittal Cordoba S.A. de C.V.
reimbursement of antidumping duties (Deacero), and 12 non-selected 3 See Memorandum, titled ‘‘Steel Concrete
companies. We preliminarily determine Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Extension of Deadline
occurred and the subsequent assessment for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
of double antidumping duties. that Deacero did not make sales of Administrative Review, 2015–2016,’’ dated July 11,
subject merchandise at less than normal 2017.
We are issuing and publishing these value during the period of review (POR). 4 See Memorandum, titled ‘‘Steel Concrete
results in accordance with sections
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Interested parties are invited to Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Extension of Deadline
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 comment on these preliminary results. for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
CFR 351.213(h)(1). Administrative Review, 2015–2016,’’ dated
DATES: Applicable December 6, 2017. September 25, 2017.
5 For a full description of the scope of the order,
18 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
see the ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
19 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations, Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
20 See 19 CFR 351.303. Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, Review: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from
21 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). International Trade Administration, Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Dec 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57814/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Notices 57583
antidumping investigation.10 These cash raised by the parties in their case briefs, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
deposit requirements, when imposed, within 120 days after issuance of these
shall remain in effect until further preliminary results.16 International Trade Administration
notice. [A–580–809]
Notification to Importers
Disclosure and Public Comment This notice serves as a preliminary Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
The Department will disclose to reminder to importers of their From the Republic of Korea:
parties to this proceeding the responsibility under 19 CFR Preliminary Results of Antidumping
calculations performed in reaching the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
preliminary results within five days of regarding the reimbursement of 2016
the date of publication of these antidumping duties prior to liquidation
preliminary results.11 Pursuant to 19 of the relevant entries during this AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may review period. Failure to comply with International Trade Administration,
submit cases briefs not later than 30 this requirement could result in the Department of Commerce.
days after the date of publication of this Secretary’s presumption that SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues reimbursement of antidumping duties (the Department) is conducting an
raised in the case briefs, may be filed occurred and increase the subsequent administrative review of the
not later than five days after the date for assessment of the antidumping duties antidumping duty order on circular
filing case briefs.12 Parties who submit by the amount of antidumping duties welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from
comments are requested to submit: (1) A reimbursed. the Republic of Korea (Korea). The
statement of the issue; (2) a brief period of review (POR) is November 1,
Notification to Interested Parties 2015, through October 31, 2016. The
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.13 All briefs must be These preliminary results of review Department preliminarily determines
filed electronically using ACCESS. An are issued and published in accordance that the producers/exporters subject to
electronically filed document must be with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of this review made sales of subject
received successfully in its entirety by the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). merchandise at less than normal value.
the Department’s electronic records Dated: November 30, 2017. We invite interested parties to comment
system, ACCESS. Gary Taverman, on these preliminary results.
Interested parties who wish to request Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping DATES: Applicable December 6, 2017.
a hearing must submit a written request and Countervailing Duty Operations, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
to the Assistant Secretary for performing the non-exclusive functions and Andre Gziryan or Thomas Schauer, AD/
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. duties of the Assistant Secretary for CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance. and Compliance, International Trade
Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS Administration, U.S. Department of
Appendix
system, and an electronically filed Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
request must be received successfully in List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone
its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Decision Memorandum
(202) 482–2201 or (202) 482–0410,
Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days 1. Summary respectively.
of publication of this notice.14 Requests 2. Background
should contain the party’s name, 3. Extension of Preliminary Results Scope of the Order
4. Scope of the Order
address, and telephone number, the 5. Duty Absorption
The merchandise subject to the order
number of participants, and a list of the 6. Allegation of Particular Market Situation is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe
issues to be discussed. If a request for 7. Margin for Companies Not Selected for and tube. Imports of the product are
a hearing is made, we will inform Individual Examination currently classifiable in the Harmonized
parties of the scheduled date for the 8. Preliminary Determination of No Tariff Schedule of the United States
hearing which will be held at the U.S. Shipments (HTSUS) under subheadings
Department of Commerce, 1401 9. Discussion of Methodology 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025,
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Date of Sale 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
Comparisons to Normal Value
DC 20230, at a time and location to be Product Comparisons 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and
determined.15 Parties should confirm by Determination of Comparison Method 7306.30.5090. While the HTSUS
telephone the date, time, and location of Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis subheadings are provided for
the hearing two days before the Constructed Export Price convenience and customs purposes, the
scheduled date. Normal Value written description is dispositive. A full
Unless the deadline is extended A. Home Market Viability description of the scope of the order is
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the B. Level of Trade contained in the Preliminary Decision
Act and 19 CFR 213(h)(2), the C. Sales to Affiliated Customers
D. Cost of Production Analysis
Memorandum.1
Department will issue the final results 1. Calculation of Cost of Production (COP)
of this administrative review, including Methodology
2. Test of Home Market Prices
the results of our analysis of the issues 3. Results of the COP Test The Department conducted this
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on review in accordance with section 751
10 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Comparison Market Prices of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than F. Currency Conversion (the Act). Constructed export price is
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Currency Conversion
Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15, 10. Recommendation 1 For a full description of the scope of the order,
2014).
11 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). [FR Doc. 2017–26295 Filed 12–5–17; 8:45 am] see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
12 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Administrative Review: Circular Welded Non-Alloy
13 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 2015–2016,’’
14 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 16 See section 75l(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by
15 See 19 CFR 351.310. 351.213(h). this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Dec 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57814/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-06 00:21:23
Document Modified: 2017-12-06 00:21:23
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable December 6, 2017. | |
| Contact | Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3692. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 57581 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR