82 FR 57611 - Certain Composite Aerogel Insulation Materials and Methods for Manufacturing the Same; Commission Decision To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 233 (December 6, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 233 (December 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 57611-57613 | |
| FR Document | 2017-26238 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 57611-57613] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-26238] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-1003] Certain Composite Aerogel Insulation Materials and Methods for Manufacturing the Same; Commission Decision To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the presiding administrative law judge's (``ALJ'') final initial determination (``ID'') issued on September 29, 2017, finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on June 8, 2016, based on a complaint filed by Aspen Aerogels, Inc. of Northborough, Massachusetts (``Aspen''). 81 FR 36955-956 (Jun. 8, 2016). The complaint alleges violations [[Page 57612]] of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain composite aerogel insulation materials and methods for manufacturing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,399,439 (``the '439 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,181,486 (``the '486 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,078,359 (``the '359 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,989,123 (``the '123 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,780,890 (``the '890 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(2). The notice of investigation named Nano Tech Co., Ltd. of Zhejiang, China (``Nano''), and Guangdong Alison Hi-Tech Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou, China (``Alison''), as respondents. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') is also a party in this investigation. All asserted claims of the '439 patent and the '486 patent and certain asserted claims of the '359 have been terminated from the investigation. See Comm'n Notice (Nov. 2, 2016); Comm'n Notice (Feb. 9, 2017). Only claims 15-17, and 19 of the '123 patent; claims 1, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, and 16 of the '359 patent; and claims 11-13, 15, 17-19, and 21 of the '890 patent (``the Asserted Claims'') remain in the investigation. On November 15, 2016, the ALJ issued Order No. 19, granting Aspen's motion for summary determination that the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement has been satisfied under section 337(a)(3)(A) and (B). The Commission determined to review in part Order No. 19. See Comm'n Notice (Dec. 7, 2016). On review, the Commission affirmed with modification the summary determination that Aspen satisfies the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. See id. at 1-2. On September 29, 2017, the ALJ issued the final ID in this investigation, finding a violation of section 337 by Respondents Alison and Nano in connection with claims 1, 5, 7, and 9 of the '359 patent; claims 15-17, and 19 of the '123 patent; and claims 11-13, 15, 17-19, and 21 of the '890 patent. The ID also finds a violation of section 337 by Respondent Nano in connection with claims 12, 15, and 16 of the '359 patent. In addition, the ID finds that Aspen has shown that its domestic industry products satisfy the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement for the Asserted Patents. The ID further finds that Respondents have not shown that the Asserted Claims are invalid. The ID also contains the ALJ's recommended determination on remedy and bonding. The ALJ recommended that the appropriate remedy is a limited exclusion order with a certification provision prohibiting the entry of certain composite aerogel insulation materials manufactured abroad by or on behalf of Respondents Alison and Nano that infringe certain claims of the '359 patent, and/or that are manufactured using certain claimed methods of the '123 patent and the '890 patent. On October 16, 2017, Respondents and OUII each filed a timely petition for review of the final ID. Respondents and OUII challenge certain of the ID's findings with respect to the validity of the Asserted Claims and the ID's findings with respect to claim 5 of the '359 patent. Respondent Alison separately challenges the ID's finding of infringement with respect to claim 9 of the '359 patent. That same day, Aspen filed a contingent petition for review of the final ID, challenging the ALJ's construction of two claim limitations in the '359 patent. On October 24, 2017, the parties filed timely responses to the petitions for review. On October 31, 2017, the parties filed their public interest comments pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(a)(4). Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ID, the petitions for review, and the responses thereto, the Commission has determined to review the ID in part. Specifically, with respect to the '359 patent, the Commission has determined to review the ALJ's construction of the ``lofty fibrous batting'' limitation in claim 1 of the '359 patent. The Commission's review of the ``lofty fibrous batting'' limitation does not include the ID's finding that Respondents have not proven that the term is invalid for indefiniteness. The Commission has also determined to review the ALJ's constructions of the additional limitations in claims 5 and 9, and the ``total surface area of that cross section'' limitation of claim 12 of the '359 patent, and the ID's associated findings on infringement and the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement with respect to those claims and claims 15 and 16 of the '359 patent. In addition, the Commission has determined to review the ID's findings that the asserted claims of the '359 patent are not invalid in view of Ramamurthi by itself or in combination with other prior art. With respect to the '123 and the '890 patents, the Commission has determined to review the ID's finding that claim 15 of the '123 patent and claims 11-13, 15, 17, and 21-23 of the '890 patent are not obvious in view of Ramamurthi and either Uchida or Yada. The Commission has determined not to review the remaining issues decided in the ID. The parties are requested to brief their positions on the issues under review with reference to the applicable law and the evidentiary record. In connection with its review, the Commission is particularly interested in responses to the following questions: 1. Please address the proper scope of claim 9 of the '359 patent and, in particular, the ``about 1 to 20%'' limitation. Your response should be limited to the evidence in the record, including a discussion of relevant statements, if any, made in the prosecution history. 2. With reference to question one, please address whether Respondent Alison's accused products infringe claim 9 of the '359 patent under the proper construction of the ``about 1 to 20%'' limitation. 3. With reference to question one, please discuss whether Ramamurthi anticipates the limitation ``the dopant is present in an amount of about 1 to 20% by weight of the total weight of the composite'' in claim 9 of the '359 patent. 4. Please address whether the Commission should adopt Dr. Gnade's interpretation or Dr. Leventis' interpretation of the ``total surface area of that cross section'' limitation in claim 12 of the '359 patent. Your response should be limited to the evidence in the record, including a discussion of relevant statements, if any, made in the prosecution history. 5. With reference to question four, please address whether Respondents' accused products and Aspen's domestic industry products meet the limitation ``where the batting is sufficiently lofty that the cross-sectional area of the fibers of the batting visible in the cross- section of the composite is less than 10% of the total surface area of that cross section'' under both Dr. Gnade's interpretation and Dr. Leventis' interpretation of the scope of claim 12 of the '359 patent. 6. With reference to question four, please discuss whether Ramamurthi anticipates the limitation ``the cross-sectional area of the fibers of the batting visible in the cross-section of the composite is less than 10% of the total surface area of that cross section'' in claim 12 of the '359 patent. 7. Please address Aspen's contention in its combined response (at 82-84) that Respondents' petitions for review presents new arguments and new evidence concerning Uchida and Yada that they failed to raise in their post-hearing briefs. [[Page 57613]] The parties have been invited to brief only these discrete issues, as enumerated above, with reference to the applicable law and evidentiary record. The parties are not to brief other issues on review, which are adequately presented in the parties' existing filings. In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the Commission may issue an order that could result in the exclusion of the subject articles from entry into the United States. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and provide information establishing that activities involving other types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994) (Commission Opinion). If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an exclusion order would have on (1) the public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in the context of this investigation. If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered. Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested to file written submissions on the issues identified in this notice. Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Such submissions should address the recommended determination by the ALJ on remedy and bonding. Complainant and the Office of Unfair Import Investigations are also requested to submit proposed remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. Complainant is further requested to state the dates that the patents expire, the HTSUS numbers under which the accused products are imported, and any known importers of the accused products. The written submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than close of business on December 15, 2017. Initial submissions are limited to 40 pages, not including any attachments or exhibits related to discussion of the public interest. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on December 22, 2017. Reply submissions are limited to 20 pages, not including any attachments or exhibits related to discussion of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. No further submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-1003'') in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. See Handbook on Filing Procedures, (https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All information, including confidential business information and documents for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the Commission for purposes of this Investigation may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel,\1\ solely for cybersecurity purposes. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 30, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017-26238 Filed 12-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Notices 57611
Hawaiian organizations stated in this 1930’s. De Laguna (1956) reports that Corporation that this notice has been
notice may proceed. caves in the vicinity had been looted as published.
DATES: Lineal descendants or early as 1934. Historical documents, Dated: September 20, 2017.
representatives of any Indian Tribe or excavation records, and archeological Melanie O’Brien,
Native Hawaiian organization not evidence indicate occupation sites in
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
identified in this notice that wish to this area are pre-contact Chugach, and
[FR Doc. 2017–26287 Filed 12–5–17; 8:45 am]
request transfer of control of these that it has been the traditional burial
grounds of the Chugach people since BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
human remains should submit a written
request with information in support of pre-contact times. The present-day
the request to the Chugach National Indian Tribes represented at the Native
Forest at the address in this notice by Village of Chenega (aka Chanega) and INTERNATIONAL TRADE
January 5, 2018. the Native Village of Tatitlek descended COMMISSION
ADDRESSES: Terri Marceron, Chugach from the earlier Chugach at Crafton [Investigation No. 337–TA–1003]
National Forest, 161 East 1st Avenue, Island. Additionally, the Native Village
Door 8, Anchorage, AK 99501, of Eyak (Cordova) may have had an Certain Composite Aerogel Insulation
telephone (907) 743–9525, email association at Crafton Island. Materials and Methods for
tmarceron@fs.fed.us. Determinations Made by the USDA Manufacturing the Same; Commission
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is Forest Service, Chugach National Decision To Review in Part a Final
here given in accordance with the Forest Initial Determination Finding a
Native American Graves Protection and Violation of Section 337; Request for
Officials of the USDA Forest Service, Written Submissions
Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
Chugach National Forest have
3003, of the completion of an inventory AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
determined that:
of human remains under the control of Commission.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
the Chugach National Forest, ACTION: Notice.
human remains described in this notice
Anchorage, AK. The human remains
represent the physical remains of one
were removed from Crafton Island, AK. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
This notice is published as part of the individual of Native American ancestry.
the U.S. International Trade
National Park Service’s administrative • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there
Commission has determined to review
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 is a relationship of shared group
in part the presiding administrative law
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in identity that can be reasonably traced
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial
this notice are the sole responsibility of between the Native American human
determination (‘‘ID’’) issued on
the museum, institution, or Federal remains and contemporary communities
September 29, 2017, finding a violation
agency that has control of the Native represented by the Native Village of
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
American human remains. The National Chenega (aka Chanega), Native Village
as amended, in the above-captioned
Park Service is not responsible for the of Eyak (Cordova), and Native Village of
investigation.
determinations in this notice. Tatitlek.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Consultation Additional Requestors and Disposition Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General
A detailed assessment of the human Lineal descendants or representatives Counsel, U.S. International Trade
remains was made by the Chugach of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
National Forest professional staff in organization not identified in this notice Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
consultation with representatives of the that wish to request transfer of control 205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
Native Village of Chenega (aka of these human remains should submit documents filed in connection with this
Chanega), Native Village of Eyak a written request with information in investigation are or will be available for
(Cordova), and Native Village of support of the request to Terri inspection during official business
Tatitlek, and representatives of the Marceron, Chugach National Forest, 161 hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Chugach Alaska Corporation, which is East 1st Avenue, Door 8, Anchorage, AK Office of the Secretary, U.S.
not an Indian Tribe. 99501, telephone (907) 743–9525, email International Trade Commission, 500 E
tmarceron@fs.fed.us, by January 5, 2018. Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
History and Description of the Remains After that date, if no additional telephone (202) 205–2000. General
In 2005, as part of an Archaeological requestors have come forward, transfer information concerning the Commission
Resources Protection Act (ARPA) of control of the human remains to the may also be obtained by accessing its
incident, Chugach National Forest Law Native Village of Eyak (Cordova), the Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Enforcement staff seized human remains Native Village of Chenega (aka The public record for this investigation
representing, at minimum, one Chanega), and the Native Village of may be viewed on the Commission’s
individual, at a cabin on Peak Island, Tatitlek may proceed. By signed electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
AK. According to case records, the delegated authority, and on behalf of the edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
person claiming ownership of the Native Village of Eyak, the Native persons are advised that information on
human remains stated that they had Village of Chenega, and the Native this matter can be obtained by
been collected from a cave on Crafton Village of Tatitlek, the Chugach Alaska contacting the Commission’s TDD
Island, in Prince William Sound circa Corporation will accept physical terminal on (202) 205–1810.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
1958. Based on size and shape, these custody of the human remains. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
human remains likely belong to a The USDA Forest Service, Chugach Commission instituted this investigation
female. No known individual was National Forest, is responsible for on June 8, 2016, based on a complaint
identified. No associated funerary notifying the Native Village of Chenega filed by Aspen Aerogels, Inc. of
objects are present. (aka Chanega), Native Village of Eyak Northborough, Massachusetts
Crafton Island is in an area that was (Cordova), and Native Village of (‘‘Aspen’’). 81 FR 36955–956 (Jun. 8,
extensively investigated in the early Tatitlek, and the Chugach Alaska 2016). The complaint alleges violations
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Dec 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57844/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Notices 57613
The parties have been invited to brief parties are encouraged to file written developing or maintaining the records
only these discrete issues, as submissions on the issues of remedy, of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
enumerated above, with reference to the the public interest, and bonding. Such internal investigations, audits, reviews,
applicable law and evidentiary record. submissions should address the and evaluations relating to the
The parties are not to brief other issues recommended determination by the ALJ programs, personnel, and operations of
on review, which are adequately on remedy and bonding. Complainant the Commission including under 5
presented in the parties’ existing filings. and the Office of Unfair Import U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
In connection with the final Investigations are also requested to government employees and contract
disposition of this investigation, the submit proposed remedial orders for the personnel,1 solely for cybersecurity
Commission may issue an order that Commission’s consideration. purposes. All nonconfidential written
could result in the exclusion of the Complainant is further requested to submissions will be available for public
subject articles from entry into the state the dates that the patents expire, inspection at the Office of the Secretary
United States. Accordingly, the the HTSUS numbers under which the and on EDIS.
Commission is interested in receiving accused products are imported, and any The authority for the Commission’s
written submissions that address the known importers of the accused determination is contained in section
form of remedy, if any, that should be products. The written submissions and 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an proposed remedial orders must be filed amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
article from entry into the United States no later than close of business on 210 of the Commission’s Rules of
for purposes other than entry for December 15, 2017. Initial submissions Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
consumption, the party should so are limited to 40 pages, not including 210).
indicate and provide information any attachments or exhibits related to
By order of the Commission.
establishing that activities involving discussion of the public interest. Reply
other types of entry either are adversely submissions must be filed no later than Issued: November 30, 2017.
affecting it or likely to do so. For the close of business on December 22, Lisa R. Barton,
background, see Certain Devices for 2017. Reply submissions are limited to Secretary to the Commission.
Connecting Computers via Telephone 20 pages, not including any attachments [FR Doc. 2017–26238 Filed 12–5–17; 8:45 am]
Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC or exhibits related to discussion of BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994) remedy, the public interest, and
(Commission Opinion). bonding. No further submissions on
If the Commission contemplates some these issues will be permitted unless INTERNATIONAL TRADE
form of remedy, it must consider the otherwise ordered by the Commission. COMMISSION
effects of that remedy upon the public Persons filing written submissions
interest. The factors the Commission must file the original document Notice of Receipt of Complaint;
will consider include the effect that an electronically on or before the deadlines Solicitation of Comments Relating to
exclusion order would have on (1) the stated above and submit 8 true paper the Public Interest
public health and welfare, (2) copies to the Office of the Secretary by
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
competitive conditions in the U.S. noon the next day pursuant to section
Commission.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles 210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
that are like or directly competitive with Practice and Procedure (19 CFR ACTION: Notice.
those that are subject to investigation, 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
and (4) U.S. consumers. The the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. the U.S. International Trade
Commission is therefore interested in 337–TA–1003’’) in a prominent place on Commission has received a complaint
receiving written submissions that the cover page and/or the first page. See
entitled Certain Mobile Electronic
address the aforementioned public Handbook on Filing Procedures,
Devices and Radio Frequency and
interest factors in the context of this (https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/
Processing Components Thereof, DN
investigation. documents/handbook_on_filing_
If the Commission orders some form 3279; the Commission is soliciting
procedures.pdf). Persons with questions
of remedy, the U.S. Trade comments on any public interest issues
regarding filing should contact the
Representative, as delegated by the raised by the complaint or
Secretary (202–205–2000).
President, has 60 days to approve or Any person desiring to submit a complainant’s filing pursuant to the
disapprove the Commission’s action. document to the Commission in Commission’s Rules of Practice and
See Presidential Memorandum of July confidence must request confidential Procedure.
21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). treatment. All such requests should be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
During this period, the subject articles directed to the Secretary to the R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission,
would be entitled to enter the United Commission and must include a full U.S. International Trade Commission,
States under bond, in an amount statement of the reasons why the 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
determined by the Commission and Commission should grant such 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The
prescribed by the Secretary of the treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents public version of the complaint can be
Treasury. The Commission is therefore for which confidential treatment by the accessed on the Commission’s
interested in receiving submissions Commission is properly sought will be Electronic Document Information
concerning the amount of the bond that treated accordingly. All information, System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov,
should be imposed if a remedy is including confidential business and will be available for inspection
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
ordered. information and documents for which during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
Written Submissions: The parties to confidential treatment is properly to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
the investigation are requested to file sought, submitted to the Commission for Secretary, U.S. International Trade
written submissions on the issues purposes of this Investigation may be Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
identified in this notice. Parties to the disclosed to and used: (i) By the
investigation, interested government Commission, its employees and Offices, 1 All contract personnel will sign appropriate
agencies, and any other interested and contract personnel (a) for nondisclosure agreements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Dec 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57844/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-06 00:21:27
Document Modified: 2017-12-06 00:21:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Contact | Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 57611 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR