82_FR_58102 82 FR 57867 - Sedaxane; Pesticide Tolerances

82 FR 57867 - Sedaxane; Pesticide Tolerances

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 235 (December 8, 2017)

Page Range57867-57872
FR Document2017-26519

This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of sedaxane in or on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16; grain, cereal, group 15; peanut; and peanut, hay. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 235 (Friday, December 8, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 235 (Friday, December 8, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57867-57872]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26519]



[[Page 57867]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0537; FRL-9970-04]


Sedaxane; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of 
sedaxane in or on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16; 
grain, cereal, group 15; peanut; and peanut, hay. Syngenta Crop 
Protection, LLC requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective December 8, 2017. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 6, 2018, 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0537, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Goodis, Registration 
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's 
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government 
Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0537 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
February 6, 2018. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections 
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0537, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of November 30, 2016 (81 FR 86312) (FRL-
9954-06), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 
6F8458) by Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, 
NC 27419. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.665 be amended by 
establishing tolerances for residues of the fungicide sedaxane, in or 
on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16 at 0.06 parts per 
million (ppm); grain, cereal, group 15 at 0.01 ppm; peanut at 0.01 ppm; 
and peanut, hay at 0.08 ppm. The petition also requested that 
tolerances for residues of sedaxane on the following commodities be 
removed upon the establishment of the petitioned-for tolerances: 
barley, grain at 0.01 ppm; barley, hay at 0.04 ppm; barley, straw at 
0.01 ppm; corn, field, forage at 0.01 ppm; corn, field, grain at 0.01 
ppm; corn, field, stover at 0.01 ppm; corn, pop, grain at 0.01 ppm; 
corn, pop, stover at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, forage at 0.01 ppm; corn, 
sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, 
stover at 0.01 ppm; oat, forage at 0.015 ppm; oat, grain at 0.01 ppm; 
oat, hay at 0.06 ppm; oat, straw at 0.01 ppm; rye, forage at 0.015 ppm; 
rye, grain at 0.01 ppm; rye, straw at 0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, forage 
at 0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, grain at 0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, stover 
at 0.01 ppm; wheat, forage at 0.015 ppm; wheat, grain at 0.01 ppm; 
wheat, hay at 0.06 ppm; and wheat, straw at 0.01 ppm. That document 
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Syngenta Crop 
Protection, LLC, the registrant, which is available in the docket, 
http://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response 
to the notice of filing.
    Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA is 
establishing tolerances and removing tolerances as requested in the 
petition, with one exception. The tolerance for crop group 16 is being 
established at 0.10 ppm to harmonize with Codex Alimentarius Commission 
maximum residue level (MRL).

[[Page 57868]]

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a 
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a 
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure 
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary 
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable 
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in 
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. 
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . 
.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors 
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available 
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this 
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a 
determination on aggregate exposure for sedaxane including exposure 
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's 
assessment of exposures and risks associated with sedaxane follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its 
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of 
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered 
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities 
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and 
children.
    The main target tissue for sedaxane was found to be the liver. 
Sedaxane also caused thyroid hypertrophy/hyperplasia in male rats. In 
the acute neurotoxicity (ACN) and sub-chronic neurotoxicity (SCN) 
studies, sedaxane caused decreased activity, muscle tone, rearing and 
grip strength; however, because no specific neurotoxic effects or 
adverse histopathology were observed, EPA has concluded that there is 
low concern for neurotoxicity.
    In the rat, no adverse effects in fetuses were seen in 
developmental toxicity studies at maternally toxic doses. In the 
rabbit, fetal toxicity was observed at the same doses as the dams. 
Offspring effects in the rat reproduction study occurred at the same 
doses causing parental effects.
    The available data show evidence of high dose liver tumors (in male 
rats and mice), thyroid tumors (in male rats), and uterine tumors (in 
female rats) resulting from exposure to sedaxane. Based on a weight of 
evidence of the available data, a constitutive androstane receptor/
pregnane-X receptor (CAR/PXR)-mediated mitogenic mode-of action (MOA) 
was established for liver tumors in male mice and rats and a liver-
mediated altered thyroid hormone homeostasis MOA was established for 
thyroid tumors in male rats. At this time, a MOA for the uterine tumors 
has not been identified.
    To assess the carcinogenic potential for sedaxane, EPA has 
concluded that a non-linear approach (i.e., RfD) is appropriate for the 
following reasons: (1) There is a clear understanding of the threshold 
(non-linear) doses associated with the key events in the established 
MOAs leading to liver and thyroid tumors in rodents (the key events 
occur only at doses that well exceed the chronic reference dose (0.11 
mg/kg/day)); (2) sedaxane is not mutagenic or genotoxic; (3) the dose 
at which uterine tumors was observed is at 261 mg/kg/day, which greatly 
exceeds the chronic reference dose (0.11 mg/kg/day) being used to 
assess chronic exposure to sedaxane. Sedaxane has been reclassified as 
``Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenic Potential''.
    Sedaxane has low acute toxicity by the oral, dermal, and inhalation 
routes. It is not a dermal sensitizer, causes no skin irritation, and 
only slight eye irritation.
    Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the 
adverse effects caused by sedaxane as well as the no-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level 
(LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at http://www.regulations.gov in document titled ``Sedaxane Human Health Risk 
Assessment to Support New Seed Treatment Uses on Cereal Grains Crop 
Group 15; Forage, Fodder and Straw of Cereal Grains Crop Group 16; 
Peanut; and Cancer Reclassification'', pages 11-19 in docket ID number 
EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0537.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA 
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of 
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the 
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no 
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for 
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed 
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to 
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) 
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified 
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with 
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a 
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe 
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes 
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the 
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of 
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the 
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete 
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides.
    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for sedaxane used for 
human risk assessment is shown in the Table of this unit.

[[Page 57869]]



                   Table--Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Sedaxane for Use in
                                          Human Health Risk Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Point of departure
        Exposure/scenario            and uncertainty/     RfD, PAD, LOC for     Study and toxicological effects
                                      safety factors       risk assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute dietary (General population  NOAEL = 30 mg/kg/day  Acute RfD = 0.30 mg/ Rat ACN Study NOAEL = 30 mg/kg
 including infants and children    UFA = 10x...........   kg/day.             LOAEL = 250 mg/kg based on reduced
 and Females 13-49 years of age).  UFH = 10x...........  aPAD = 0.30 mg/kg/    activity, decreased rearing,
                                   FQPA SF = 1x........   day..                initial inactivity, piloerection,
                                                                               ruffled fur and recumbency,
                                                                               decreased body weight (BW),
                                                                               decreased body weight gain (BWG)
                                                                               and food consumption (males). In
                                                                               females, weakened condition,
                                                                               swaying gait, decreased activity,
                                                                               reduced muscle tone, and
                                                                               decreased locomotor activity and
                                                                               rearing. The weakened condition,
                                                                               swaying gait and decreased
                                                                               activity were observed on days 2-
                                                                               7, while the other effects were
                                                                               on day 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chronic dietary (All populations)  NOAEL= 11 mg/kg/day.  Chronic RfD = 0.11   Chronic Rat Study
                                   UFA = 10x...........   mg/kg/day.          NOAEL = 11/14 mg/kg bw/day [male]/
                                   UFH = 10x...........  cPAD = 0.11 mg/kg/    [female]
                                   FQPA SF = 1x........   day..               LOAEL = 67/86 mg/kg bw/day [male]/
                                                                               [female] in males based on
                                                                               decreased hind limb grip
                                                                               strength, increased liver weight,
                                                                               increased incidences of
                                                                               hepatocyte hypertrophy and
                                                                               eosinophilic foci, and thyroid
                                                                               follicular cell hypertrophy,
                                                                               basophilic colloid, epithelial
                                                                               desquamation and increased
                                                                               phosphate levels ([male]). In
                                                                               females, it was based on
                                                                               decreased BW and BWG, increased
                                                                               liver weight and the same thyroid
                                                                               histopathology noted above for
                                                                               males.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancer (Oral, dermal, inhalation)  Classification: ``Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenic Potential''. A non-
                                    linear approach (i.e., RfD) would adequately account for all chronic
                                    toxicity, including carcinogenicity, that could result from exposure to
                                    sedaxane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FQPA SF = Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level. LOC = level
  of concern. mg/kg/day= milligram/kilogram/day. MOE = margin of exposure. NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-
  level. PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic). RfD = reference dose. UF = uncertainty factor.
  UFA = extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies). UFH = potential variation in sensitivity among
  members of the human population (intraspecies).

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary 
exposure to sedaxane, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned for 
tolerances as well as all existing sedaxane tolerances in 40 CFR 
180.665. EPA assessed dietary exposures from sedaxane in food as 
follows:
    i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk 
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological 
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring 
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure.
    Such effects were identified for sedaxane. In estimating acute 
dietary exposure, EPA used food consumption information from the United 
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) under the Continuing Surveys of 
Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII) and the CDC under the National 
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey What We Eat in America (NHANES/
WEIA) 2003-2008. EPA assumed tolerance-level residues for all 
commodities and 100% crop treated. Default processing factors were used 
with the exception of peanut butter.
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure 
assessment EPA used the food consumption data from the USDA NHANES/WEIA 
2003-2008. EPA assumed tolerance-level residues for all commodities and 
100% crop treated (CT). Default processing factors were used with the 
exception of peanut butter.
    iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has 
concluded that a nonlinear RfD approach is appropriate for assessing 
cancer risk to sedaxane. Cancer risk was assessed using the same 
exposure estimates as discussed in Unit III.C.1.ii.
    iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information. 
EPA did not use anticipated residue and/or PCT information in the 
dietary assessment for sedaxane. Tolerance-level residues and/or 100% 
CT were assumed for all food commodities.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening-
level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk 
assessment for sedaxane in drinking water. These simulation models take 
into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport 
characteristics of sedaxane. Further information regarding EPA drinking 
water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be found at 
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/about-water-exposure-models-used-pesticide.
    Based on the FQPA Index Reservoir Screening Tool (FIRST) and 
Pesticide Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM GW), the estimated 
drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) of sedaxane for acute exposures 
are estimated to be 4.1 parts per billion (ppb) for surface water and 
15.1 ppb for ground water and for chronic exposures for non-cancer 
assessments are estimated to be 1.2 ppb for surface water and 13.0 ppb 
for ground water. The surface water estimates include contributions 
from all drinking water residues of concern identified for risk 
assessment purposes; nevertheless, the ground water EDWCs were higher 
than the surface water EDWCs and were selected for use in the dietary 
exposure assessments.
    Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly 
entered into the dietary exposure model. For acute dietary risk 
assessment, the water concentration value of 15.1 ppb was used to 
assess the contribution to drinking water. For chronic dietary risk 
assessment, the water concentration of value 13.0 ppb was used to 
assess the contribution to drinking water.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is 
used in this document to refer to non-

[[Page 57870]]

occupational, non-dietary exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest 
control, indoor pest control, termiticides, and flea and tick control 
on pets). Sedaxane is not registered for any specific use patterns that 
would result in residential exposure.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of 
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when 
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the 
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative 
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances 
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative 
risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made 
a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to sedaxane and any other 
substances, and sedaxane does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite 
produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance 
action, therefore, EPA has assumed that sedaxane does not have a common 
mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding 
EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of 
toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see 
EPA's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA 
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants 
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal 
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity 
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a 
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This 
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality 
Protection Act Safety Factor (FQPA SF). In applying this provision, EPA 
either retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional 
safety factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of 
a different factor.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. There is no evidence for 
increased susceptibility following prenatal or post-natal exposures to 
sedaxane based on effects seen in developmental toxicity studies in 
rabbits or rats. In range-finding and definitive developmental toxicity 
studies in rats, neither quantitative nor qualitative evidence of 
increased susceptibility of fetuses to in utero exposure to sedaxane 
was observed. In these studies, there were no single-dose effects. 
There was no evidence of increased susceptibility in a two-generation 
reproduction study in rats following prenatal or post-natal exposure to 
sedaxane. There was no evidence of neuropathology or abnormalities in 
the development of the fetal nervous system from the available toxicity 
studies conducted with sedaxane. Clear NOAELs/LOAELs were established 
for the developmental effects seen in rats and rabbits as well as for 
the offspring effects seen in the two-generation reproduction study. 
The dose-response relationship for the effects of concern is well 
characterized.
    3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the 
safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the 
FQPA SF were reduced to 1X. That decision is based on the following 
findings:
    i. The toxicity database for sedaxane is complete.
    ii. Given the available information, there is low concern that 
sedaxane is a neurotoxic chemical and there is no need for a 
developmental neurotoxicity study or additional uncertainty factors 
(UFs) to account for neurotoxicity.
    iii. In the rat, no adverse effects in fetuses were seen in 
developmental toxicity at maternally toxic doses. In the rabbit, fetal 
toxicity was observed at the same doses as the dam (increased 
unossified sternebrae and 13th rudimentary ribs and a decrease in fetal 
weights of -9% and increased abortions). In the dam, at the same doses, 
the effects were decreased body weight, reduced food consumption, and 
decreased defecation. In reproduction studies, offspring effects 
occurred at the same doses causing parental effects; thus, there was no 
quantitative increase in sensitivity in rat pups. The LOAELs and NOAELs 
for the developmental and reproduction studies were clearly defined. 
The NOAEL used for the acute dietary risk assessment (30 mg/kg/day), 
based on effects observed in the ACN study, is protective of the 
developmental and offspring effects seen in rabbits and rats with the 
NOAELs of 100-200 mg/kg/day. Based on these considerations, there are 
no residual uncertainties for pre-and/or post-natal susceptibility.
    iv. There were no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure 
databases. The dietary food exposure assessments were performed based 
on 100% CT and tolerance-level residues. EPA made conservative 
(protective) assumptions in the ground and surface water modeling used 
to assess exposure to sedaxane in drinking water. These assessments 
will not underestimate the exposure and risks posed by sedaxane.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide 
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the 
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA 
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the 
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term 
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, 
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an 
adequate MOE exists.
    1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this 
unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water 
to sedaxane will occupy <1% of the aPAD for all infants (<1-year-old), 
the population group receiving the greatest exposure.
    2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this 
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to 
sedaxane from food and water will utilize <1% of the cPAD for all 
population subgroups. There are no residential uses for sedaxane.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into 
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food 
and water (considered to be a background exposure level). Because there 
are no proposed or registered residential uses of sedaxane, a short-
term risk assessment was not performed. The chronic risk assessment is 
protective for any short-term exposures from food and drinking water.
    4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure 
takes into account intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic 
exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure 
level). Because there are no proposed or registered residential uses of 
sedaxane, an intermediate-term risk assessment was not performed. The 
chronic risk assessment is protective for any intermediate-term 
exposures from food and drinking water.
    5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. As discussed in Unit 
III.A., EPA has concluded that using the nonlinear approach based on 
the chronic RfD will be protective of potential carcinogenicity.

[[Page 57871]]

    6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA 
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate 
exposure to sedaxane residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An adequate analytical method is available to enforce the proposed 
tolerances for sedaxane in plant commodities. A modification of the 
Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) method was 
developed for the determination of residues of sedaxane (as its isomers 
SYN508210 and SYN508211) in/on various crops. The sedaxane isomers 
(SYN508210 and SYN508211) are quantitatively determined by LC/MS/MS. 
The validated limit of quantitation (LOQ) reported in the method is 
0.005 ppm for both sedaxane isomers.
    The analytical standard for sedaxane, with an expiration date of 
February 28, 2018, is currently available in the EPA National Pesticide 
Standards Repository.

B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. 
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent 
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA 
considers the international MRL established by the Codex Alimentarius 
Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). The Codex 
is a joint United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization/World 
Health Organization food standards program, and it is recognized as an 
international food safety standards-setting organization in trade 
agreements to which the United States is a party. EPA may establish a 
tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 
408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons for departing from the 
Codex level.
    Codex has established MRLs for sedaxane in or on grain, cereal, 
forage, fodder and straw, group 16 at 0.10 ppm and grain, cereal, group 
15 at 0.01 ppm. Codex has not established a MRL for sedaxane in or on 
peanut. Tolerances are harmonized with the Codex MRLs for groups 16 and 
15.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of sedaxane in 
or on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16 at 0.10 ppm; 
grain, cereal, group 15 at 0.01 ppm; peanut at 0.01 ppm; and peanut, 
hay at 0.08 ppm. In addition, EPA is removing the following existing 
tolerances for residues of sedaxane as they are superseded by the 
tolerances established in this rulemaking: Barley, grain at 0.01 ppm; 
barley, hay at 0.04 ppm; barley, straw at 0.01 ppm; corn, field, forage 
at 0.01 ppm; corn, field, grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, field, stover at 
0.01 ppm; corn, pop, grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, pop, stover at 0.01 ppm; 
corn, sweet, forage at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with 
husks removed at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, stover at 0.01 ppm; oat, forage 
at 0.015 ppm; oat, grain at 0.01 ppm; oat, hay at 0.06 ppm; oat, straw 
at 0.01 ppm; rye, forage at 0.015 ppm; rye, grain at 0.01 ppm; rye, 
straw at 0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, forage at 0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, 
grain at 0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, stover at 0.01 ppm; wheat, forage at 
0.015 ppm; wheat, grain at 0.01 ppm; wheat, hay at 0.06 ppm; and wheat, 
straw at 0.01 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in 
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any 
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal 
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and 
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government 
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 22, 2017.
Michael L. Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  180.665, revise the table in paragraph (a) to read as 
follows:

[[Page 57872]]

Sec.  180.665   Sedaxane; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Parts per
                          Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beet, sugar, roots..........................................        0.01
Canola, seed................................................        0.01
Cotton, gin byproducts......................................        0.01
Cotton, undelinted seed.....................................        0.01
Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16...........        0.10
Grain, cereal, group 15.....................................        0.01
Pea and bean, dried shelled, except soybean, subgroup 6C....        0.01
Peanut......................................................        0.01
Peanut, hay.................................................        0.08
Potato......................................................        0.02
Potato, wet peel............................................       0.075
Rapeseed, subgroup 20A......................................        0.01
Soybean, forage.............................................        0.05
Soybean, hay................................................        0.04
Soybean, seed...............................................        0.01
Vegetable, foliage of legume, except soybean, subgroup 7A...        0.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-26519 Filed 12-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                         57867

                                              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                determine whether this document                       delivery of boxed information, please
                                              AGENCY                                                  applies to them. Potentially affected                 follow the instructions at http://
                                                                                                      entities may include:                                 www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
                                              40 CFR Part 180                                           • Crop production (NAICS code 111).                   Additional instructions on
                                                                                                        • Animal production (NAICS code
                                              [EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0537; FRL–9970–04]                                                                           commenting or visiting the docket,
                                                                                                      112).
                                                                                                        • Food manufacturing (NAICS code                    along with more information about
                                              Sedaxane; Pesticide Tolerances                                                                                dockets generally, is available at http://
                                                                                                      311).
                                              AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                         • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS                    www.epa.gov/dockets.
                                              Agency (EPA).                                           code 32532).                                          II. Summary of Petitioned-For
                                              ACTION: Final rule.                                                                                           Tolerance
                                                                                                      B. How can I get electronic access to
                                              SUMMARY:   This regulation establishes                  other related information?
                                                                                                                                                               In the Federal Register of November
                                              tolerances for residues of sedaxane in or                  You may access a frequently updated                30, 2016 (81 FR 86312) (FRL–9954–06),
                                              on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and                    electronic version of EPA’s tolerance                 EPA issued a document pursuant to
                                              straw, group 16; grain, cereal, group 15;               regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through                FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
                                              peanut; and peanut, hay. Syngenta Crop                  the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR                346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
                                              Protection, LLC requested these                         site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-             pesticide petition (PP 6F8458) by
                                              tolerances under the Federal Food,                      idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/                  Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, P.O.
                                              Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).                         40tab_02.tpl.                                         Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419. The
                                              DATES: This regulation is effective
                                                                                                      C. How can I file an objection or hearing             petition requested that 40 CFR 180.665
                                              December 8, 2017. Objections and
                                                                                                      request?                                              be amended by establishing tolerances
                                              requests for hearings must be received
                                                                                                        Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21                      for residues of the fungicide sedaxane,
                                              on or before February 6, 2018, and must
                                                                                                      U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an                   in or on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and
                                              be filed in accordance with the
                                                                                                      objection to any aspect of this regulation            straw, group 16 at 0.06 parts per million
                                              instructions provided in 40 CFR part
                                                                                                      and may also request a hearing on those               (ppm); grain, cereal, group 15 at 0.01
                                              178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
                                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).                             objections. You must file your objection              ppm; peanut at 0.01 ppm; and peanut,
                                                                                                      or request a hearing on this regulation               hay at 0.08 ppm. The petition also
                                              ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
                                                                                                      in accordance with the instructions                   requested that tolerances for residues of
                                              identified by docket identification (ID)
                                                                                                      provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure                sedaxane on the following commodities
                                              number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0537, is
                                                                                                      proper receipt by EPA, you must                       be removed upon the establishment of
                                              available at http://www.regulations.gov
                                                                                                      identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–                     the petitioned-for tolerances: barley,
                                              or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
                                              Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)                   OPP–2016–0537 in the subject line on                  grain at 0.01 ppm; barley, hay at 0.04
                                              in the Environmental Protection Agency                  the first page of your submission. All                ppm; barley, straw at 0.01 ppm; corn,
                                              Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William                    objections and requests for a hearing                 field, forage at 0.01 ppm; corn, field,
                                              Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301                 must be in writing, and must be                       grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, field, stover at
                                              Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC                   received by the Hearing Clerk on or                   0.01 ppm; corn, pop, grain at 0.01 ppm;
                                              20460–0001. The Public Reading Room                     before February 6, 2018. Addresses for                corn, pop, stover at 0.01 ppm; corn,
                                              is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,                    mail and hand delivery of objections                  sweet, forage at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet,
                                              Monday through Friday, excluding legal                  and hearing requests are provided in 40               kernel plus cob with husks removed at
                                              holidays. The telephone number for the                  CFR 178.25(b).                                        0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, stover at 0.01
                                              Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,                    In addition to filing an objection or               ppm; oat, forage at 0.015 ppm; oat, grain
                                              and the telephone number for the OPP                    hearing request with the Hearing Clerk                at 0.01 ppm; oat, hay at 0.06 ppm; oat,
                                              Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review                 as described in 40 CFR part 178, please               straw at 0.01 ppm; rye, forage at 0.015
                                              the visitor instructions and additional                 submit a copy of the filing (excluding                ppm; rye, grain at 0.01 ppm; rye, straw
                                              information about the docket available                  any Confidential Business Information                 at 0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, forage at
                                              at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.                          (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.            0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, grain at 0.01
                                              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                      Information not marked confidential                   ppm; sorghum, grain, stover at 0.01
                                              Michael L. Goodis, Registration Division                pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be                      ppm; wheat, forage at 0.015 ppm; wheat,
                                              (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,                  disclosed publicly by EPA without prior               grain at 0.01 ppm; wheat, hay at 0.06
                                              Environmental Protection Agency, 1200                   notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your               ppm; and wheat, straw at 0.01 ppm.
                                              Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,                      objection or hearing request, identified              That document referenced a summary of
                                              DC 20460–0001; main telephone                           by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–                       the petition prepared by Syngenta Crop
                                              number: (703) 305–7090; email address:                  2016–0537, by one of the following                    Protection, LLC, the registrant, which is
                                              RDFRNotices@epa.gov.                                    methods:                                              available in the docket, http://
                                                                                                        • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://               www.regulations.gov. There were no
                                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                      www.regulations.gov. Follow the online                comments received in response to the
                                              I. General Information                                  instructions for submitting comments.                 notice of filing.
                                                                                                      Do not submit electronically any
                                              A. Does this action apply to me?                        information you consider to be CBI or                    Based upon review of the data
                                                 You may be potentially affected by                   other information whose disclosure is                 supporting the petition, EPA is
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              this action if you are an agricultural                  restricted by statute.                                establishing tolerances and removing
                                              producer, food manufacturer, or                           • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental                   tolerances as requested in the petition,
                                              pesticide manufacturer. The following                   Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/                 with one exception. The tolerance for
                                              list of North American Industrial                       DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.                 crop group 16 is being established at
                                              Classification System (NAICS) codes is                  NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.                       0.10 ppm to harmonize with Codex
                                              not intended to be exhaustive, but rather                 • Hand Delivery: To make special                    Alimentarius Commission maximum
                                              provides a guide to help readers                        arrangements for hand delivery or                     residue level (MRL).


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:24 Dec 07, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00049   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM   08DER1


                                              57868             Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                              III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and                      (SCN) studies, sedaxane caused                        effects caused by sedaxane as well as
                                              Determination of Safety                                 decreased activity, muscle tone, rearing              the no-observed-adverse-effect-level
                                                                                                      and grip strength; however, because no                (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-
                                                 Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
                                                                                                      specific neurotoxic effects or adverse                adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the
                                              allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
                                                                                                      histopathology were observed, EPA has                 toxicity studies can be found at http://
                                              legal limit for a pesticide chemical
                                                                                                      concluded that there is low concern for               www.regulations.gov in document titled
                                              residue in or on a food) only if EPA
                                                                                                      neurotoxicity.                                        ‘‘Sedaxane Human Health Risk
                                              determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’                 In the rat, no adverse effects in fetuses
                                              Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA                                                                             Assessment to Support New Seed
                                                                                                      were seen in developmental toxicity                   Treatment Uses on Cereal Grains Crop
                                              defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a              studies at maternally toxic doses. In the
                                              reasonable certainty that no harm will                                                                        Group 15; Forage, Fodder and Straw of
                                                                                                      rabbit, fetal toxicity was observed at the            Cereal Grains Crop Group 16; Peanut;
                                              result from aggregate exposure to the                   same doses as the dams. Offspring
                                              pesticide chemical residue, including                                                                         and Cancer Reclassification’’, pages 11–
                                                                                                      effects in the rat reproduction study                 19 in docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
                                              all anticipated dietary exposures and all               occurred at the same doses causing
                                              other exposures for which there is                                                                            2016–0537.
                                                                                                      parental effects.
                                              reliable information.’’ This includes                      The available data show evidence of                B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
                                              exposure through drinking water and in                  high dose liver tumors (in male rats and              Levels of Concern
                                              residential settings, but does not include              mice), thyroid tumors (in male rats), and
                                              occupational exposure. Section                                                                                   Once a pesticide’s toxicological
                                                                                                      uterine tumors (in female rats) resulting
                                              408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to                                                                         profile is determined, EPA identifies
                                                                                                      from exposure to sedaxane. Based on a
                                              give special consideration to exposure                                                                        toxicological points of departure (POD)
                                                                                                      weight of evidence of the available data,
                                              of infants and children to the pesticide                                                                      and levels of concern to use in
                                                                                                      a constitutive androstane receptor/
                                              chemical residue in establishing a                                                                            evaluating the risk posed by human
                                                                                                      pregnane-X receptor (CAR/PXR)-
                                              tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a                                                                     exposure to the pesticide. For hazards
                                                                                                      mediated mitogenic mode-of action
                                              reasonable certainty that no harm will                                                                        that have a threshold below which there
                                                                                                      (MOA) was established for liver tumors
                                              result to infants and children from                                                                           is no appreciable risk, the toxicological
                                                                                                      in male mice and rats and a liver-
                                              aggregate exposure to the pesticide                                                                           POD is used as the basis for derivation
                                                                                                      mediated altered thyroid hormone
                                              chemical residue. . . .’’                                                                                     of reference values for risk assessment.
                                                                                                      homeostasis MOA was established for
                                                 Consistent with FFDCA section                                                                              PODs are developed based on a careful
                                                                                                      thyroid tumors in male rats. At this
                                              408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in                                                                    analysis of the doses in each
                                                                                                      time, a MOA for the uterine tumors has
                                              FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has                                                                           toxicological study to determine the
                                                                                                      not been identified.
                                              reviewed the available scientific data                     To assess the carcinogenic potential               dose at which no adverse effects are
                                              and other relevant information in                       for sedaxane, EPA has concluded that a                observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest
                                              support of this action. EPA has                         non-linear approach (i.e., RfD) is                    dose at which adverse effects of concern
                                              sufficient data to assess the hazards of                appropriate for the following reasons:                are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/
                                              and to make a determination on                          (1) There is a clear understanding of the             safety factors are used in conjunction
                                              aggregate exposure for sedaxane                         threshold (non-linear) doses associated               with the POD to calculate a safe
                                              including exposure resulting from the                   with the key events in the established                exposure level—generally referred to as
                                              tolerances established by this action.                  MOAs leading to liver and thyroid                     a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a
                                              EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks                 tumors in rodents (the key events occur               reference dose (RfD)—and a safe margin
                                              associated with sedaxane follows.                       only at doses that well exceed the                    of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold
                                                                                                      chronic reference dose (0.11 mg/kg/                   risks, the Agency assumes that any
                                              A. Toxicological Profile                                                                                      amount of exposure will lead to some
                                                                                                      day)); (2) sedaxane is not mutagenic or
                                                EPA has evaluated the available                       genotoxic; (3) the dose at which uterine              degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
                                              toxicity data and considered its validity,              tumors was observed is at 261 mg/kg/                  estimates risk in terms of the probability
                                              completeness, and reliability as well as                day, which greatly exceeds the chronic                of an occurrence of the adverse effect
                                              the relationship of the results of the                  reference dose (0.11 mg/kg/day) being                 expected in a lifetime. For more
                                              studies to human risk. EPA has also                     used to assess chronic exposure to                    information on the general principles
                                              considered available information                        sedaxane. Sedaxane has been                           EPA uses in risk characterization and a
                                              concerning the variability of the                       reclassified as ‘‘Suggestive Evidence of              complete description of the risk
                                              sensitivities of major identifiable                     Carcinogenic Potential’’.                             assessment process, see http://
                                              subgroups of consumers, including                          Sedaxane has low acute toxicity by                 www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-
                                              infants and children.                                   the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes.              assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-
                                                The main target tissue for sedaxane                   It is not a dermal sensitizer, causes no              human-health-risk-pesticides.
                                              was found to be the liver. Sedaxane also                skin irritation, and only slight eye                     A summary of the toxicological
                                              caused thyroid hypertrophy/hyperplasia                  irritation.                                           endpoints for sedaxane used for human
                                              in male rats. In the acute neurotoxicity                   Specific information on the studies                risk assessment is shown in the Table of
                                              (ACN) and sub-chronic neurotoxicity                     received and the nature of the adverse                this unit.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:24 Dec 07, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00050   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM   08DER1


                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                               57869

                                                                  TABLE—SUMMARY OF TOXICOLOGICAL DOSES AND ENDPOINTS FOR SEDAXANE FOR USE IN
                                                                                        HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
                                                                                       Point of departure        RfD, PAD, LOC for
                                                     Exposure/scenario                  and uncertainty/                                                    Study and toxicological effects
                                                                                                                  risk assessment
                                                                                         safety factors

                                              Acute dietary (General popu-           NOAEL = 30 mg/kg/          Acute RfD = 0.30           Rat ACN Study NOAEL = 30 mg/kg
                                                lation including infants and          day.                        mg/kg/day.               LOAEL = 250 mg/kg based on reduced activity, decreased
                                                children and Females 13–49           UFA = 10x                  aPAD = 0.30 mg/kg/           rearing, initial inactivity, piloerection, ruffled fur and recum-
                                                years of age).                       UFH = 10x                    day.                       bency, decreased body weight (BW), decreased body weight
                                                                                     FQPA SF = 1x                                            gain (BWG) and food consumption (males). In females,
                                                                                                                                             weakened condition, swaying gait, decreased activity, re-
                                                                                                                                             duced muscle tone, and decreased locomotor activity and
                                                                                                                                             rearing. The weakened condition, swaying gait and de-
                                                                                                                                             creased activity were observed on days 2–7, while the other
                                                                                                                                             effects were on day 1.

                                              Chronic dietary (All populations)      NOAEL= 11 mg/kg/           Chronic RfD = 0.11         Chronic Rat Study
                                                                                      day.                        mg/kg/day.               NOAEL = 11/14 mg/kg bw/day .//
                                                                                     UFA = 10x                  cPAD = 0.11 mg/kg/         LOAEL = 67/86 mg/kg bw/day .// in males based on de-
                                                                                     UFH = 10x                    day.                       creased hind limb grip strength, increased liver weight, in-
                                                                                     FQPA SF = 1x                                            creased incidences of hepatocyte hypertrophy and
                                                                                                                                             eosinophilic foci, and thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy, baso-
                                                                                                                                             philic colloid, epithelial desquamation and increased phos-
                                                                                                                                             phate levels (.). In females, it was based on decreased BW
                                                                                                                                             and BWG, increased liver weight and the same thyroid
                                                                                                                                             histopathology noted above for males.

                                              Cancer (Oral, dermal, inhala-          Classification: ‘‘Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenic Potential’’. A non-linear approach (i.e., RfD) would ade-
                                                tion).                               quately account for all chronic toxicity, including carcinogenicity, that could result from exposure to sedaxane.

                                                FQPA SF = Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level. LOC = level of concern. mg/kg/day=
                                              milligram/kilogram/day. MOE = margin of exposure. NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-level. PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c =
                                              chronic). RfD = reference dose. UF = uncertainty factor. UFA = extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies). UFH = potential variation in
                                              sensitivity among members of the human population (intraspecies).


                                              C. Exposure Assessment                                  EPA used the food consumption data                    and-assessing-pesticide-risks/about-
                                                                                                      from the USDA NHANES/WEIA 2003–                       water-exposure-models-used-pesticide.
                                                 1. Dietary exposure from food and                                                                            Based on the FQPA Index Reservoir
                                                                                                      2008. EPA assumed tolerance-level
                                              feed uses. In evaluating dietary                                                                              Screening Tool (FIRST) and Pesticide
                                                                                                      residues for all commodities and 100%
                                              exposure to sedaxane, EPA considered                                                                          Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM
                                                                                                      crop treated (CT). Default processing
                                              exposure under the petitioned for                                                                             GW), the estimated drinking water
                                                                                                      factors were used with the exception of
                                              tolerances as well as all existing                                                                            concentrations (EDWCs) of sedaxane for
                                                                                                      peanut butter.
                                              sedaxane tolerances in 40 CFR 180.665.                                                                        acute exposures are estimated to be 4.1
                                              EPA assessed dietary exposures from                        iii. Cancer. Based on the data
                                                                                                      summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has                    parts per billion (ppb) for surface water
                                              sedaxane in food as follows:                                                                                  and 15.1 ppb for ground water and for
                                                 i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute                concluded that a nonlinear RfD
                                                                                                      approach is appropriate for assessing                 chronic exposures for non-cancer
                                              dietary exposure and risk assessments                                                                         assessments are estimated to be 1.2 ppb
                                              are performed for a food-use pesticide,                 cancer risk to sedaxane. Cancer risk was
                                                                                                      assessed using the same exposure                      for surface water and 13.0 ppb for
                                              if a toxicological study has indicated the                                                                    ground water. The surface water
                                              possibility of an effect of concern                     estimates as discussed in Unit III.C.1.ii.
                                                                                                                                                            estimates include contributions from all
                                              occurring as a result of a 1-day or single                 iv. Anticipated residue and percent                drinking water residues of concern
                                              exposure.                                               crop treated (PCT) information. EPA did               identified for risk assessment purposes;
                                                 Such effects were identified for                     not use anticipated residue and/or PCT                nevertheless, the ground water EDWCs
                                              sedaxane. In estimating acute dietary                   information in the dietary assessment                 were higher than the surface water
                                              exposure, EPA used food consumption                     for sedaxane. Tolerance-level residues                EDWCs and were selected for use in the
                                              information from the United States                      and/or 100% CT were assumed for all                   dietary exposure assessments.
                                              Department of Agriculture (USDA)                        food commodities.                                       Modeled estimates of drinking water
                                              under the Continuing Surveys of Food                       2. Dietary exposure from drinking                  concentrations were directly entered
                                              Intake by Individuals (CSFII) and the                   water. The Agency used screening-level                into the dietary exposure model. For
                                              CDC under the National Health and                       water exposure models in the dietary                  acute dietary risk assessment, the water
                                              Nutrition Examination Survey What We                    exposure analysis and risk assessment                 concentration value of 15.1 ppb was
                                              Eat in America (NHANES/WEIA) 2003–                      for sedaxane in drinking water. These                 used to assess the contribution to
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              2008. EPA assumed tolerance-level                       simulation models take into account                   drinking water. For chronic dietary risk
                                              residues for all commodities and 100%                   data on the physical, chemical, and fate/             assessment, the water concentration of
                                              crop treated. Default processing factors                transport characteristics of sedaxane.                value 13.0 ppb was used to assess the
                                              were used with the exception of peanut                  Further information regarding EPA                     contribution to drinking water.
                                              butter.                                                 drinking water models used in pesticide                 3. From non-dietary exposure. The
                                                 ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting                  exposure assessment can be found at                   term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
                                              the chronic dietary exposure assessment                 https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-                this document to refer to non-


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:24 Dec 07, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00051   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM   08DER1


                                              57870             Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                              occupational, non-dietary exposure                      neither quantitative nor qualitative                  water modeling used to assess exposure
                                              (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control,                evidence of increased susceptibility of               to sedaxane in drinking water. These
                                              indoor pest control, termiticides, and                  fetuses to in utero exposure to sedaxane              assessments will not underestimate the
                                              flea and tick control on pets). Sedaxane                was observed. In these studies, there                 exposure and risks posed by sedaxane.
                                              is not registered for any specific use                  were no single-dose effects. There was
                                                                                                                                                            E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
                                              patterns that would result in residential               no evidence of increased susceptibility
                                              exposure.                                               in a two-generation reproduction study                Safety
                                                 4. Cumulative effects from substances                in rats following prenatal or post-natal                 EPA determines whether acute and
                                              with a common mechanism of toxicity.                    exposure to sedaxane. There was no                    chronic dietary pesticide exposures are
                                              Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA                        evidence of neuropathology or                         safe by comparing aggregate exposure
                                              requires that, when considering whether                 abnormalities in the development of the               estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and
                                              to establish, modify, or revoke a                       fetal nervous system from the available               chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer
                                              tolerance, the Agency consider                          toxicity studies conducted with                       risks, EPA calculates the lifetime
                                              ‘‘available information’’ concerning the                sedaxane. Clear NOAELs/LOAELs were                    probability of acquiring cancer given the
                                              cumulative effects of a particular                      established for the developmental                     estimated aggregate exposure. Short-,
                                              pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other                        effects seen in rats and rabbits as well              intermediate-, and chronic-term risks
                                              substances that have a common                           as for the offspring effects seen in the              are evaluated by comparing the
                                              mechanism of toxicity.’’                                two-generation reproduction study. The                estimated aggregate food, water, and
                                                 Unlike other pesticides for which EPA                dose-response relationship for the                    residential exposure to the appropriate
                                              has followed a cumulative risk approach                 effects of concern is well characterized.             PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE
                                              based on a common mechanism of                             3. Conclusion. EPA has determined                  exists.
                                              toxicity, EPA has not made a common                     that reliable data show the safety of                    1. Acute risk. Using the exposure
                                              mechanism of toxicity finding as to                     infants and children would be                         assumptions discussed in this unit for
                                              sedaxane and any other substances, and                  adequately protected if the FQPA SF                   acute exposure, the acute dietary
                                              sedaxane does not appear to produce a                   were reduced to 1X. That decision is                  exposure from food and water to
                                              toxic metabolite produced by other                      based on the following findings:                      sedaxane will occupy <1% of the aPAD
                                              substances. For the purposes of this                       i. The toxicity database for sedaxane              for all infants (<1-year-old), the
                                              tolerance action, therefore, EPA has                    is complete.                                          population group receiving the greatest
                                              assumed that sedaxane does not have a                      ii. Given the available information,
                                                                                                                                                            exposure.
                                              common mechanism of toxicity with                       there is low concern that sedaxane is a
                                                                                                      neurotoxic chemical and there is no                      2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure
                                              other substances. For information
                                                                                                      need for a developmental neurotoxicity                assumptions described in this unit for
                                              regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
                                                                                                      study or additional uncertainty factors               chronic exposure, EPA has concluded
                                              which chemicals have a common
                                                                                                      (UFs) to account for neurotoxicity.                   that chronic exposure to sedaxane from
                                              mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
                                                                                                         iii. In the rat, no adverse effects in             food and water will utilize <1% of the
                                              the cumulative effects of such
                                                                                                      fetuses were seen in developmental                    cPAD for all population subgroups.
                                              chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at https://
                                                                                                      toxicity at maternally toxic doses. In the            There are no residential uses for
                                              www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-
                                              assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-                   rabbit, fetal toxicity was observed at the            sedaxane.
                                              assessment-risk-pesticides.                             same doses as the dam (increased                         3. Short-term risk. Short-term
                                                                                                      unossified sternebrae and 13th                        aggregate exposure takes into account
                                              D. Safety Factor for Infants and                        rudimentary ribs and a decrease in fetal              short-term residential exposure plus
                                              Children                                                weights of ¥9% and increased                          chronic exposure to food and water
                                                1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of                abortions). In the dam, at the same                   (considered to be a background
                                              FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply                     doses, the effects were decreased body                exposure level). Because there are no
                                              an additional tenfold (10X) margin of                   weight, reduced food consumption, and                 proposed or registered residential uses
                                              safety for infants and children in the                  decreased defecation. In reproduction                 of sedaxane, a short-term risk
                                              case of threshold effects to account for                studies, offspring effects occurred at the            assessment was not performed. The
                                              prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the                 same doses causing parental effects;                  chronic risk assessment is protective for
                                              completeness of the database on toxicity                thus, there was no quantitative increase              any short-term exposures from food and
                                              and exposure unless EPA determines                      in sensitivity in rat pups. The LOAELs                drinking water.
                                              based on reliable data that a different                 and NOAELs for the developmental and                     4. Intermediate-term risk.
                                              margin of safety will be safe for infants               reproduction studies were clearly                     Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
                                              and children. This additional margin of                 defined. The NOAEL used for the acute                 takes into account intermediate-term
                                              safety is commonly referred to as the                   dietary risk assessment (30 mg/kg/day),               residential exposure plus chronic
                                              Food Quality Protection Act Safety                      based on effects observed in the ACN                  exposure to food and water (considered
                                              Factor (FQPA SF). In applying this                      study, is protective of the                           to be a background exposure level).
                                              provision, EPA either retains the default               developmental and offspring effects                   Because there are no proposed or
                                              value of 10X, or uses a different                       seen in rabbits and rats with the                     registered residential uses of sedaxane,
                                              additional safety factor when reliable                  NOAELs of 100–200 mg/kg/day. Based                    an intermediate-term risk assessment
                                              data available to EPA support the choice                on these considerations, there are no                 was not performed. The chronic risk
                                              of a different factor.                                  residual uncertainties for pre-and/or                 assessment is protective for any
                                                2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity.                post-natal susceptibility.                            intermediate-term exposures from food
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              There is no evidence for increased                         iv. There were no residual                         and drinking water.
                                              susceptibility following prenatal or                    uncertainties identified in the exposure                 5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S.
                                              post-natal exposures to sedaxane based                  databases. The dietary food exposure                  population. As discussed in Unit III.A.,
                                              on effects seen in developmental                        assessments were performed based on                   EPA has concluded that using the
                                              toxicity studies in rabbits or rats. In                 100% CT and tolerance-level residues.                 nonlinear approach based on the
                                              range-finding and definitive                            EPA made conservative (protective)                    chronic RfD will be protective of
                                              developmental toxicity studies in rats,                 assumptions in the ground and surface                 potential carcinogenicity.


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:24 Dec 07, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00052   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM   08DER1


                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                             57871

                                                 6. Determination of safety. Based on                 at 0.01 ppm; peanut at 0.01 ppm; and                  retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
                                              these risk assessments, EPA concludes                   peanut, hay at 0.08 ppm. In addition,                 this action alter the relationships or
                                              that there is a reasonable certainty that               EPA is removing the following existing                distribution of power and
                                              no harm will result to the general                      tolerances for residues of sedaxane as                responsibilities established by Congress
                                              population, or to infants and children                  they are superseded by the tolerances                 in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
                                              from aggregate exposure to sedaxane                     established in this rulemaking: Barley,               section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
                                              residues.                                               grain at 0.01 ppm; barley, hay at 0.04                has determined that this action will not
                                                                                                      ppm; barley, straw at 0.01 ppm; corn,                 have a substantial direct effect on States
                                              IV. Other Considerations                                field, forage at 0.01 ppm; corn, field,               or tribal governments, on the
                                              A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology                   grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, field, stover at             relationship between the national
                                                                                                      0.01 ppm; corn, pop, grain at 0.01 ppm;               government and the States or tribal
                                                An adequate analytical method is
                                                                                                      corn, pop, stover at 0.01 ppm; corn,                  governments, or on the distribution of
                                              available to enforce the proposed
                                                                                                      sweet, forage at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet,               power and responsibilities among the
                                              tolerances for sedaxane in plant
                                                                                                      kernel plus cob with husks removed at                 various levels of government or between
                                              commodities. A modification of the
                                                                                                      0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, stover at 0.01                 the Federal Government and Indian
                                              Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged,                  ppm; oat, forage at 0.015 ppm; oat, grain
                                              and Safe (QuEChERS) method was                                                                                tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
                                                                                                      at 0.01 ppm; oat, hay at 0.06 ppm; oat,               that Executive Order 13132, entitled
                                              developed for the determination of                      straw at 0.01 ppm; rye, forage at 0.015
                                              residues of sedaxane (as its isomers                                                                          ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
                                                                                                      ppm; rye, grain at 0.01 ppm; rye, straw               1999) and Executive Order 13175,
                                              SYN508210 and SYN508211) in/on                          at 0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, forage at
                                              various crops. The sedaxane isomers                                                                           entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
                                                                                                      0.01 ppm; sorghum, grain, grain at 0.01               with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
                                              (SYN508210 and SYN508211) are                           ppm; sorghum, grain, stover at 0.01
                                              quantitatively determined by LC/MS/                                                                           67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
                                                                                                      ppm; wheat, forage at 0.015 ppm; wheat,               to this action. In addition, this action
                                              MS. The validated limit of quantitation                 grain at 0.01 ppm; wheat, hay at 0.06
                                              (LOQ) reported in the method is 0.005                                                                         does not impose any enforceable duty or
                                                                                                      ppm; and wheat, straw at 0.01 ppm.                    contain any unfunded mandate as
                                              ppm for both sedaxane isomers.
                                                The analytical standard for sedaxane,                 VI. Statutory and Executive Order                     described under Title II of the Unfunded
                                              with an expiration date of February 28,                 Reviews                                               Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
                                              2018, is currently available in the EPA                                                                       1501 et seq.).
                                                                                                         This action establishes tolerances                    This action does not involve any
                                              National Pesticide Standards                            under FFDCA section 408(d) in                         technical standards that would require
                                              Repository.                                             response to a petition submitted to the               Agency consideration of voluntary
                                              B. International Residue Limits                         Agency. The Office of Management and                  consensus standards pursuant to section
                                                                                                      Budget (OMB) has exempted these types                 12(d) of the National Technology
                                                 In making its tolerance decisions, EPA               of actions from review under Executive
                                              seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with                                                                       Transfer and Advancement Act
                                                                                                      Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory                    (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
                                              international standards whenever                        Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
                                              possible, consistent with U.S. food                     October 4, 1993). Because this action                 VII. Congressional Review Act
                                              safety standards and agricultural                       has been exempted from review under                     Pursuant to the Congressional Review
                                              practices. EPA considers the                            Executive Order 12866, this action is                 Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
                                              international MRL established by the                    not subject to Executive Order 13211,                 submit a report containing this rule and
                                              Codex Alimentarius Commission                           entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning                         other required information to the U.S.
                                              (Codex), as required by FFDCA section                   Regulations That Significantly Affect                 Senate, the U.S. House of
                                              408(b)(4). The Codex is a joint United                  Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66             Representatives, and the Comptroller
                                              Nations Food and Agriculture                            FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive                  General of the United States prior to
                                              Organization/World Health                               Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of                 publication of the rule in the Federal
                                              Organization food standards program,                    Children from Environmental Health                    Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
                                              and it is recognized as an international                Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,                rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
                                              food safety standards-setting                           April 23, 1997). This action does not
                                              organization in trade agreements to                     contain any information collections                   List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
                                              which the United States is a party. EPA                 subject to OMB approval under the                       Environmental protection,
                                              may establish a tolerance that is                       Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44                     Administrative practice and procedure,
                                              different from a Codex MRL; however,                    U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require             Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
                                              FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that                   any special considerations under                      and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
                                              EPA explain the reasons for departing                   Executive Order 12898, entitled                       requirements.
                                              from the Codex level.                                   ‘‘Federal Actions to Address
                                                                                                                                                              Dated: November 22, 2017.
                                                 Codex has established MRLs for                       Environmental Justice in Minority
                                              sedaxane in or on grain, cereal, forage,                                                                      Michael L. Goodis,
                                                                                                      Populations and Low-Income
                                              fodder and straw, group 16 at 0.10 ppm                  Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,               Director, Registration Division, Office of
                                              and grain, cereal, group 15 at 0.01 ppm.                                                                      Pesticide Programs.
                                                                                                      1994).
                                              Codex has not established a MRL for                        Since tolerances and exemptions that                 Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
                                              sedaxane in or on peanut. Tolerances                    are established on the basis of a petition            amended as follows:
                                              are harmonized with the Codex MRLs                      under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              for groups 16 and 15.                                   the tolerance in this final rule, do not              PART 180—[AMENDED]
                                                                                                      require the issuance of a proposed rule,
                                              V. Conclusion                                                                                                 ■ 1. The authority citation for part 180
                                                                                                      the requirements of the Regulatory
                                                Therefore, tolerances are established                                                                       continues to read as follows:
                                                                                                      Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
                                              for residues of sedaxane in or on grain,                seq.), do not apply.                                      Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
                                              cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group                    This action directly regulates growers,            ■ 2. In § 180.665, revise the table in
                                              16 at 0.10 ppm; grain, cereal, group 15                 food processors, food handlers, and food              paragraph (a) to read as follows:


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:24 Dec 07, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00053   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM   08DER1


                                              57872                  Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                              § 180.665 Sedaxane; tolerances for                                 number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0687, is                      in accordance with the instructions
                                              residues.                                                          available at http://www.regulations.gov              provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
                                                  (a) * * *                                                      or at the Office of Pesticide Programs               proper receipt by EPA, you must
                                                                                                                 Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)                identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
                                                                                                 Parts per       in the Environmental Protection Agency               OPP–2016–0687 in the subject line on
                                                             Commodity                            million        Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William                 the first page of your submission. All
                                              Beet, sugar, roots .......................                  0.01   Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301              objections and requests for a hearing
                                              Canola, seed ..............................                 0.01   Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,                  must be in writing, and must be
                                              Cotton, gin byproducts ...............                      0.01   DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading                    received by the Hearing Clerk on or
                                              Cotton, undelinted seed .............                       0.01   Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30                  before February 6, 2018. Addresses for
                                              Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and                                  p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding               mail and hand delivery of objections
                                                straw, group 16 .......................                   0.10   legal holidays. The telephone number                 and hearing requests are provided in 40
                                              Grain, cereal, group 15 ..............                      0.01   for the Public Reading Room is (202)                 CFR 178.25(b).
                                              Pea and bean, dried shelled, ex-                                   566–1744, and the telephone number for                 In addition to filing an objection or
                                                cept soybean, subgroup 6C ....                         0.01                                                           hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
                                                                                                                 the OPP Docket is (703) 305–5805.
                                              Peanut ........................................          0.01                                                           as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
                                              Peanut, hay ................................             0.08      Please review the visitor instructions
                                                                                                                 and additional information about the                 submit a copy of the filing (excluding
                                              Potato .........................................         0.02
                                              Potato, wet peel ..........................             0.075      docket available at http://www.epa.gov/              any Confidential Business Information
                                              Rapeseed, subgroup 20A ...........                       0.01      dockets.                                             (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
                                              Soybean, forage .........................                0.05      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                                                                                      Information not marked confidential
                                              Soybean, hay ..............................              0.04      Robert McNally, Biopesticides and                    pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
                                              Soybean, seed ............................               0.01      Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),               disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
                                              Vegetable, foliage of legume, ex-
                                                                                                                 Office of Pesticide Programs,                        notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
                                                cept soybean, subgroup 7A ....                            0.01                                                        objection or hearing request, identified
                                                                                                                 Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
                                                                                                                                                                      by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
                                              *        *        *        *        *                              Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
                                                                                                                                                                      2016–0687, by one of the following
                                              [FR Doc. 2017–26519 Filed 12–7–17; 8:45 am]                        DC 20460–0001; main telephone
                                                                                                                                                                      methods:
                                              BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                                                                                 number: (703) 305–7090; email address:                 • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
                                                                                                                 BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.                               www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
                                                                                                                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                           instructions for submitting comments.
                                              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                           I. General Information                               Do not submit electronically any
                                              AGENCY                                                                                                                  information you consider to be CBI or
                                                                                                                 A. Does this action apply to me?                     other information whose disclosure is
                                              40 CFR Part 180                                                                                                         restricted by statute.
                                                                                                                    You may be potentially affected by
                                              [EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0687; FRL–9969–96]                                this action if you are an agricultural                 • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
                                                                                                                 producer, food manufacturer, or                      Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
                                              Bacillus subtilis Strain BU1814;                                   pesticide manufacturer. The following                DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
                                              Exemption From the Requirement of a                                list of North American Industrial                    NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
                                              Tolerance                                                          Classification System (NAICS) codes is                 • Hand Delivery: To make special
                                                                                                                 not intended to be exhaustive, but rather            arrangements for hand delivery or
                                              AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                                                                                       delivery of boxed information, please
                                              Agency (EPA).                                                      provides a guide to help readers
                                                                                                                 determine whether this document                      follow the instructions at http://
                                              ACTION: Final rule.                                                                                                     www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
                                                                                                                 applies to them. Potentially affected
                                              SUMMARY:    This regulation establishes an                         entities may include:                                Additional instructions on commenting
                                              exemption from the requirement of a                                   • Crop production (NAICS code 111).               or visiting the docket, along with more
                                              tolerance for residues of Bacillus subtilis                           • Animal production (NAICS code                   information about dockets generally, is
                                              strain BU1814 in or on all food                                    112).                                                available at http://www.epa.gov/
                                              commodities when used in accordance                                   • Food manufacturing (NAICS code                  dockets.
                                              with label directions and good                                     311).                                                II. Background
                                              agricultural practices. BASF                                          • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
                                                                                                                 code 32532).                                            In the Federal Register of February 7,
                                              Corporation submitted a petition to EPA                                                                                 2017 (82 FR 9555) (FRL–9956–86), EPA
                                              under the Federal Food, Drug, and                                  B. How can I get electronic access to                issued a document pursuant to FFDCA
                                              Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an                                other related information?                           section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3),
                                              exemption from the requirement of a                                                                                     announcing the filing of a pesticide
                                                                                                                   You may access a frequently updated
                                              tolerance. This regulation eliminates the                                                                               tolerance petition (PP 6F8490) by BASF
                                                                                                                 electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
                                              need to establish a maximum                                                                                             Corporation, 26 Davis Dr., P.O. Box
                                                                                                                 through the Government Printing
                                              permissible level for residues of Bacillus                                                                              13528, Research Triangle Park, NC
                                                                                                                 Office’s e-CFR site at http://www.
                                              subtilis strain BU1814 under FFDCA.                                                                                     27709. The petition requested that 40
                                                                                                                 ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/
                                              DATES: This regulation is effective                                ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.                     CFR part 180 be amended by
                                              December 8, 2017. Objections and                                                                                        establishing an exemption from the
                                              requests for hearings must be received                             C. How can I file an objection or hearing            requirement of a tolerance for residues
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              on or before February 6, 2018, and must                            request?                                             of the fungicide Bacillus subtilis strain
                                              be filed in accordance with the                                      Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21                     BU1814 in or on all food commodities.
                                              instructions provided in 40 CFR part                               U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an               That document referenced a summary of
                                              178 (see also Unit I.C. of the                                     objection to any aspect of this regulation           the petition prepared by the petitioner
                                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).                                        and may also request a hearing on those              BASF Corporation, which is available in
                                              ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,                             objections. You must file your objection             the docket via http://
                                              identified by docket identification (ID)                           or request a hearing on this regulation              www.regulations.gov. There were no


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014        16:24 Dec 07, 2017       Jkt 244001    PO 00000   Frm 00054   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM   08DER1



Document Created: 2017-12-08 01:43:49
Document Modified: 2017-12-08 01:43:49
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis regulation is effective December 8, 2017. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before February 6, 2018, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ContactMichael L. Goodis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
FR Citation82 FR 57867 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR