82 FR 60334 - Test Procedures and Labeling Standards for Recycled Oil

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 243 (December 20, 2017)

Page Range		60334-60335
FR Document		2017-27374
The Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'') requests public comment on the overall costs, benefits, and regulatory and economic impact of its rule specifying Test Procedures and Labeling Standards for Recycled Oil (``Recycled Oil Rule'' or ``Rule''), as part of the Commission's systematic review of all current FTC rules and guides.
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60334-60335]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27374]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 60334]]



FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 311

RIN 3084-AB48


Test Procedures and Labeling Standards for Recycled Oil

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'').

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for public 
comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'') 
requests public comment on the overall costs, benefits, and regulatory 
and economic impact of its rule specifying Test Procedures and Labeling 
Standards for Recycled Oil (``Recycled Oil Rule'' or ``Rule''), as part 
of the Commission's systematic review of all current FTC rules and 
guides.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 12, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by 
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``16 CFR part 311--
Recycled Oil, Matter No. R811006'' on your comment, and file your 
comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/RecycledOilReview, by following the instructions on the web-based form. 
If you prefer to file your comment on paper, mail your comment to the 
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex A), Washington, DC 
20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade 
Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th 
Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex A), Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hampton Newsome, (202) 326-2889, 
Attorney, Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 
Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, CC-9528, 
Washington, DC 20580.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    The Recycled Oil Rule, mandated by the Energy Policy and 
Conservation Act (``EPCA'') (42 U.S.C. 6363), contains testing and 
labeling requirements for recycled engine oil. As indicated in the 
statute, the Rule's purpose is to encourage used oil recycling, promote 
recycled oil use, reduce new oil consumption, and reduce environmental 
hazards and wasteful practices associated with used oil disposal.\1\ 
The Rule, initially promulgated in 1995 (60 FR 55414 (Oct. 31, 1995)), 
allows manufacturers to represent that processed used engine oil is 
substantially equivalent to new oil as long as they substantiate such 
claims using American Petroleum Institute (API) Publication 1509 
(Engine Oil Licensing and Certification System).\2\ The Rule does not 
require manufacturers to explicitly state that their engine oil is 
substantially equivalent to new oil, nor does it mandate any specific 
qualifiers or disclosures.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 42 U.S.C. 6363(a).
    \2\ Under EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6363(c)), the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology (``NIST'') must develop (and report to the 
FTC) applicable standards for determining the substantial 
equivalence of processed used engine oil with new engine oil. NIST 
recommended API 1509 when the Commission originally promulgated the 
Rule.
    \3\ 60 FR at 55418-55419.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Regulatory Review Program

    The Commission reviews its rules and guides periodically to seek 
information about their costs and benefits, regulatory and economic 
impact, and general effectiveness in protecting consumers and helping 
industry avoid deceptive claims. These reviews assist the Commission in 
identifying rules and guides that warrant modification or rescission. 
As part of its last review in 2007, the Commission determined to retain 
the Rule and updated the reference to API Publication 1509, Fifteenth 
Edition, and added an explanation of incorporation by reference in 
Sec.  311.4.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 72 FR 14410, 14413 (March 28, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With the present Notice, the Commission initiates a new review. The 
Commission solicits comments on, among other things, the economic 
impact of, and the continuing need for, the Recycled Oil Rule; the 
Rule's benefits to consumers; and the burdens it places on industry 
members subject to the Rule's requirements, including small businesses.

III. Issues for Comments

    To aid commenters in submitting information, the Commission has 
prepared the following specific questions related to the Recycled Oil 
Rule. The Commission seeks comments on these and any other issues 
related to the Rule's current requirements. In their replies, 
commenters should provide any available evidence and data that supports 
their position, such as empirical data, consumer perception studies, 
and consumer complaints.
    (1) Need: Is there a continuing need for the Rule? Why or why not?
    (2) Benefits and Costs to Consumers: What benefits has the Rule 
provided to consumers, and does the Rule impose any significant costs 
on consumers?
    (3) Benefits and Costs to Industry Members: What benefits, if any, 
has the Rule provided to businesses, and does the Rule impose any 
significant costs, including costs of compliance, on businesses, 
including small businesses?
    (4) Recommended Changes: What modifications, if any, should the 
Commission make to the Rule to increase its benefits or reduce its 
costs? How would these modifications affect the costs and benefits of 
the Rule for consumers? How would these modifications affect the costs 
and benefits of the Rule for businesses, particularly small businesses?
    (5) Impact on Information: What impact has the Rule had on the flow 
of truthful information to consumers and on the flow of deceptive 
information to consumers?
    (6) Compliance: Provide any evidence concerning the degree of 
industry compliance with the Rule. Does this evidence indicate that the 
Rule should be modified? If so, why, and how? If not, why not?
    (7) Unnecessary Provisions: Provide any evidence concerning whether 
any of the Rule's provisions are no longer necessary. Explain why these 
provisions are unnecessary.
    (8) Technological or Economic Changes: What modifications, if any, 
should be made to the Rule to account for current or impending changes 
in

[[Page 60335]]

technology or economic conditions? How would these modifications affect 
the costs and benefits of the Rule for consumers and businesses, 
particularly small businesses?
    (9) Conflicts With Other Requirements: Does the Rule overlap or 
conflict with other federal, state, or local laws or regulations? If 
so, how? Provide any evidence that supports your position. With 
reference to the asserted conflicts, should the Rule be modified? If 
so, why, and how? If not, why not? Are there any Rule changes necessary 
to help state law enforcement agencies combat deceptive practices in 
the recycled engine oil market? Provide any evidence concerning whether 
the Rule has assisted in promoting national consistency with respect to 
the advertising of recycled engine oil.
    (10) Update Rule Reference to API Document: Should the Commission 
update the Rule to incorporate by reference the current version (i.e., 
the Seventeenth Edition) of the API Publication 1509? \5\ If so, should 
the incorporation include a specific date or other information to 
identify the seventeenth edition of API Publication 1509?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The current Rule (Section 311.4) references the Fifteenth 
Edition of API Publication 1509.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Comment Submissions

    You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to 
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before February 12, 
2018. Write ``16 CFR part 311--Recycled Oil, Matter No. R811006'' on 
your comment. Your comment--including your name and your state--will be 
placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the 
extent practicable, on the public Commission website, at http://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. Postal mail addressed to the 
Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security screening. As 
a result, we encourage you to submit your comments online, or to send 
them to the Commission by courier or overnight service. To make sure 
that the Commission considers your online comment, you must file it at 
https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/RecycledOilReview, by following 
the instructions on the web-based form. When this Notice appears at 
https://www.regulations.gov, you also may file a comment through that 
website.
    If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ``16 CFR part 
311--Recycled Oil, Matter No. R811006'' on your comment and on the 
envelope, and mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade 
Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 
CC-5610 (Annex A), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the 
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex 
A), Washington, DC 20024. If possible, submit your paper comment to the 
Commission by courier or overnight service.
    Because your comment will be placed on the publicly accessible FTC 
website at https://www.ftc.gov, you are solely responsible for making 
sure that your comment does not include any sensitive or confidential 
information. In particular, your comment should not include any 
sensitive personal information, such as your or anyone else's Social 
Security number; date of birth; driver's license number or other state 
identification number, or foreign country equivalent; passport number; 
financial account number; or credit or debit card number. You are also 
solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include 
any sensitive health information, such as medical records or other 
individually identifiable health information. In addition, your comment 
should not include any ``trade secret or any commercial or financial 
information which . . . is privileged or confidential''--as provided by 
Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 
16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including, in particular, competitively sensitive 
information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, 
patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
    Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is 
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled 
``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). 
In particular, the written request for confidential treatment that 
accompanies the comment must include the factual and legal basis for 
the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment to 
be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your comment 
will be kept confidential only if the General Counsel grants your 
request in accordance with the law and the public interest. Once your 
comment has been posted on the public FTC website--as legally required 
by FTC Rule 4.9(b)--we cannot redact or remove your comment from the 
FTC website, unless you submit a confidentiality request that meets the 
requirements for such treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General 
Counsel grants that request.
    Visit the FTC website to read this Notice and the news release 
describing it. The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission 
administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and 
use in this proceeding, as appropriate. The Commission will consider 
all timely and responsive public comments that it receives on or before 
February 12, 2018. For information on the Commission's privacy policy, 
including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.

    By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-27374 Filed 12-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
60334

Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 243

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania among other things, the economic
contains notices to the public of the proposed Avenue NW, CC–9528, Washington, DC impact of, and the continuing need for,
issuance of rules and regulations. The 20580. the Recycled Oil Rule; the Rule’s
purpose of these notices is to give interested benefits to consumers; and the burdens
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
persons an opportunity to participate in the it places on industry members subject to
rule making prior to the adoption of the final I. Background the Rule’s requirements, including small
rules.
The Recycled Oil Rule, mandated by businesses.
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act
III. Issues for Comments
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (‘‘EPCA’’) (42 U.S.C. 6363), contains
testing and labeling requirements for To aid commenters in submitting
16 CFR Part 311 recycled engine oil. As indicated in the information, the Commission has
statute, the Rule’s purpose is to prepared the following specific
RIN 3084–AB48 encourage used oil recycling, promote questions related to the Recycled Oil
recycled oil use, reduce new oil Rule. The Commission seeks comments
Test Procedures and Labeling on these and any other issues related to
Standards for Recycled Oil consumption, and reduce
environmental hazards and wasteful the Rule’s current requirements. In their
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission practices associated with used oil replies, commenters should provide any
(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’). disposal.1 The Rule, initially available evidence and data that
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed promulgated in 1995 (60 FR 55414 (Oct. supports their position, such as
rulemaking; request for public 31, 1995)), allows manufacturers to empirical data, consumer perception
comment. represent that processed used engine oil studies, and consumer complaints.
is substantially equivalent to new oil as (1) Need: Is there a continuing need
SUMMARY: The Federal Trade long as they substantiate such claims for the Rule? Why or why not?
Commission (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) using American Petroleum Institute (2) Benefits and Costs to Consumers:
requests public comment on the overall (API) Publication 1509 (Engine Oil What benefits has the Rule provided to
costs, benefits, and regulatory and Licensing and Certification System).2 consumers, and does the Rule impose
economic impact of its rule specifying The Rule does not require any significant costs on consumers?
Test Procedures and Labeling Standards manufacturers to explicitly state that (3) Benefits and Costs to Industry
for Recycled Oil (‘‘Recycled Oil Rule’’ or their engine oil is substantially Members: What benefits, if any, has the
‘‘Rule’’), as part of the Commission’s equivalent to new oil, nor does it Rule provided to businesses, and does
systematic review of all current FTC mandate any specific qualifiers or the Rule impose any significant costs,
rules and guides. disclosures.3 including costs of compliance, on
DATES: Comments must be received on businesses, including small businesses?
or before February 12, 2018. II. Regulatory Review Program (4) Recommended Changes: What
The Commission reviews its rules and modifications, if any, should the
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
guides periodically to seek information Commission make to the Rule to
comment online or on paper, by
about their costs and benefits, regulatory increase its benefits or reduce its costs?
following the instructions in the
and economic impact, and general How would these modifications affect
Request for Comment part of the
effectiveness in protecting consumers the costs and benefits of the Rule for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
and helping industry avoid deceptive consumers? How would these
below. Write ‘‘16 CFR part 311—
claims. These reviews assist the modifications affect the costs and
Recycled Oil, Matter No. R811006’’ on
Commission in identifying rules and benefits of the Rule for businesses,
your comment, and file your comment
guides that warrant modification or particularly small businesses?
online at https://ftcpublic. (5) Impact on Information: What
commentworks.com/ftc/ rescission. As part of its last review in
2007, the Commission determined to impact has the Rule had on the flow of
RecycledOilReview, by following the truthful information to consumers and
instructions on the web-based form. If retain the Rule and updated the
reference to API Publication 1509, on the flow of deceptive information to
you prefer to file your comment on consumers?
paper, mail your comment to the Fifteenth Edition, and added an
(6) Compliance: Provide any evidence
following address: Federal Trade explanation of incorporation by
concerning the degree of industry
Commission, Office of the Secretary, reference in § 311.4.4
With the present Notice, the compliance with the Rule. Does this
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite evidence indicate that the Rule should
CC–5610 (Annex A), Washington, DC Commission initiates a new review. The
Commission solicits comments on, be modified? If so, why, and how? If
20580, or deliver your comment to the not, why not?
following address: Federal Trade (7) Unnecessary Provisions: Provide
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS

1 42 U.S.C. 6363(a).
Commission, Office of the Secretary, 2 Under any evidence concerning whether any of
EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6363(c)), the National
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, Institute of Standards and Technology (‘‘NIST’’) the Rule’s provisions are no longer
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex A), must develop (and report to the FTC) applicable necessary. Explain why these provisions
Washington, DC 20024. standards for determining the substantial are unnecessary.
equivalence of processed used engine oil with new
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
engine oil. NIST recommended API 1509 when the
(8) Technological or Economic
Hampton Newsome, (202) 326–2889, Commission originally promulgated the Rule. Changes: What modifications, if any,
Attorney, Division of Enforcement, 3 60 FR at 55418–55419. should be made to the Rule to account
Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal 4 72 FR 14410, 14413 (March 28, 2007). for current or impending changes in

VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:03 Dec 19, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM 20DEP1
Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:56:11
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:56:11
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for public comment.
Dates		Comments must be received on or before February 12, 2018.
Contact		Hampton Newsome, (202) 326-2889, Attorney, Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580.
FR Citation		82 FR 60334
RIN Number		3084-AB48