82_FR_61008 82 FR 60763 - Certain L-Tryptophan, L-Tryptophan Products, and Their Methods of Production; Commission Final Determination Finding a Section 337 Violation; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order; Termination of the Investigation

82 FR 60763 - Certain L-Tryptophan, L-Tryptophan Products, and Their Methods of Production; Commission Final Determination Finding a Section 337 Violation; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order; Termination of the Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 245 (December 22, 2017)

Page Range60763-60764
FR Document2017-27567

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (``section 337''), as amended, in this investigation. The Commission has issued a limited exclusion order prohibiting the importation of certain L-tryptophan and L-tryptophan products that infringe claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,180,373 (``the '373 patent'') or claim 20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,666,655 (``the '655 patent''). The Commission has also issued a cease and desist order directed to the domestic respondent. The investigation is terminated.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 245 (Friday, December 22, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 245 (Friday, December 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60763-60764]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27567]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1005]


Certain L-Tryptophan, L-Tryptophan Products, and Their Methods of 
Production; Commission Final Determination Finding a Section 337 
Violation; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist 
Order; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (``section 337''), as amended, in this investigation. The 
Commission has issued a limited exclusion order prohibiting the 
importation of certain L-tryptophan and L-tryptophan products that 
infringe claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,180,373 (``the '373 patent'') or 
claim 20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,666,655 (``the '655 patent''). The 
Commission has also issued a cease and desist order directed to the 
domestic respondent. The investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Investigation No. 
337-TA-1005 on June 14, 2016, based on a complaint filed by 
Complainants Ajinomoto Co., Inc. of Tokyo, Japan and Ajinomoto 
Heartland Inc. of Chicago, Illinois (collectively, ``Ajinomoto'' or 
``Complainants''). See 81 FR 38735-6 (June 14, 2016). The complaint, as 
supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), based upon the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain L-tryptophan, L-tryptophan 
products, and their methods of production, by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of the '655 patent and the '373 patent (collectively, 
``the asserted patents''). Id. The notice of investigation identified 
CJ CheilJedang Corp. of Seoul, Republic of Korea; CJ America, Inc. 
(``CJ America'') of Downers Grove, Illinois; and PT CheilJedang 
Indonesia of Jakarta, Indonesia (collectively ``CJ'' or 
``Respondents'') as respondents in this investigation. See id. The 
Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not a party to the 
investigation.
    On April 17, 2017, the ALJ issued an initial determination (``ID'') 
granting Complainants' unopposed motion for summary determination that 
they satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement 
under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(A) and (B) for both asserted patents. See 
Order No. 18, unreviewed, Comm'n Notice (May 17, 2017).
    On August 11, 2017, the ALJ issued his final initial determination 
(``FID'') finding no violation of section 337. Specifically, the FID 
finds that: (1) Respondents' accused products do not infringe the 
asserted claims of the '373 or the '655 patents either literally or 
under the doctrine of equivalents; (2) claim 10 of the '373 patent is 
invalid for indefiniteness and lack of written description; (3) claim 
20 of the '655 patent is invalid for lack of written description; and 
(4) Complainants' products do not satisfy the technical prong of the 
domestic industry requirement with respect to the '655 or the '373 
patents. In addition, the ALJ issued a Recommended Determination 
(``RD'') recommending, should the Commission find a section 337 
violation, that the Commission issue: (1) A limited exclusion order 
against Respondents' accused products; and (2) a cease and desist order 
against Respondent CJ America. The RD further recommends no bond during 
the Presidential review period.
    On August 14, 2017, the Commission issued a Notice requesting 
written submissions on the public interest. See 82 FR 39456-57 (Aug. 
18, 2017). On September 20, 2017, Respondents filed a written 
submission in response to the Commission's August 14, 2017 Notice. No 
other submissions were received.
    On October 12, 2017, the Commission issued a Notice determining to 
review the FID in its entirety. See 82 FR 48528-29 (Oct. 18, 2017). The 
October 12, 2017 Notice requested briefing in response to certain 
questions relating to the FID's finding of no section 337 violation. 
See id. In addition, the October 12, 2017 Notice solicited written 
submissions on issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. See 
id. On October 27, 2017, the parties filed written submissions in 
response to the October 12, 2017 Notice, and on November 3, 2017, the 
parties filed responses to each other's submissions.
    Having examined the record of this investigation, including the 
FID, the RD, and the parties' submissions, the Commission has 
determined to:
    (1) Reverse the FID's finding that the accused products do not 
infringe claim 10 of the '373 patent;
    (2) reverse the FID's finding that the domestic industry 
requirement is not satisfied for the '373 patent.
    (3) Reverse the FID's finding that claim 10 of the '373 patent is 
invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, for indefiniteness;
    (4) reverse the FID's finding that claim 10 of the '373 patent is 
invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, for lack of written 
description;
    (5) affirm the FID's finding that claim 10 of the '373 patent is 
not invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, for lack of 
enablement;
    (6) affirm the FID's finding that claim 10 of the '373 patent is 
not invalid under 35 U.S.C. 103 for obviousness;
    (7) affirm in part and reverse in part the FID's finding that the 
accused products do not infringe claim 20 of the '655 patent;
    (8) reverse the FID's finding that the domestic industry 
requirement is not satisfied for the '655 patent.
    (9) Affirm the FID's finding that claim 20 of the '655 patent is 
not invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, for indefiniteness.
    (10) Reverse the FID's finding that claim 20 of the '655 patent is 
invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, for lack of written 
description; and
    (11) affirm all other findings in the FID that are not inconsistent 
with the Commission's determination.

[[Page 60764]]

    Accordingly, the Commission finds that there is a violation of 
section 337 with respect to both asserted patents. The Commission has 
determined the appropriate remedy is a limited exclusion order against 
Respondents' accused products, and a cease and desist order against 
Respondent CJ America. The Commission has also determined that the 
public interest factors enumerated in subsections 337(d)(l) and (f)(1) 
(19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(l), (f)(1)) do not preclude issuance of the limited 
exclusion order and cease and desist order. The Commission has further 
determined to set a bond at zero (0) percent of entered value during 
the Presidential review period (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)).
    The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President 
and to the United States Trade Representative on the day of their 
issuance.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).


    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: December 18, 2017.
 Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-27567 Filed 12-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                                            Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 245 / Friday, December 22, 2017 / Notices                                            60763

                                                amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in                        contacting the Commission’s TDD                       recommends no bond during the
                                                section 210.75 of the Commission’s                      terminal on (202) 205–1810.                           Presidential review period.
                                                Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR                                                                          On August 14, 2017, the Commission
                                                                                                        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:       The                  issued a Notice requesting written
                                                210.75).
                                                                                                        Commission instituted Investigation No.               submissions on the public interest. See
                                                  By order of the Commission.                           337–TA–1005 on June 14, 2016, based
                                                  Issued: December 18, 2017.                                                                                  82 FR 39456–57 (Aug. 18, 2017). On
                                                                                                        on a complaint filed by Complainants                  September 20, 2017, Respondents filed
                                                Lisa R. Barton,                                         Ajinomoto Co., Inc. of Tokyo, Japan and               a written submission in response to the
                                                Secretary to the Commission.                            Ajinomoto Heartland Inc. of Chicago,                  Commission’s August 14, 2017 Notice.
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–27568 Filed 12–21–17; 8:45 am]            Illinois (collectively, ‘‘Ajinomoto’’ or              No other submissions were received.
                                                BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                  ‘‘Complainants’’). See 81 FR 38735–6                     On October 12, 2017, the Commission
                                                                                                        (June 14, 2016). The complaint, as                    issued a Notice determining to review
                                                                                                        supplemented, alleges violations of                   the FID in its entirety. See 82 FR 48528–
                                                INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                     section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as             29 (Oct. 18, 2017). The October 12, 2017
                                                COMMISSION                                              amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), based upon                  Notice requested briefing in response to
                                                                                                        the importation into the United States,               certain questions relating to the FID’s
                                                [Investigation No. 337–TA–1005]                         the sale for importation, and the sale                finding of no section 337 violation. See
                                                                                                        within the United States after                        id. In addition, the October 12, 2017
                                                Certain L-Tryptophan, L-Tryptophan                      importation of certain L-tryptophan, L-               Notice solicited written submissions on
                                                Products, and Their Methods of                          tryptophan products, and their methods                issues of remedy, the public interest,
                                                Production; Commission Final                            of production, by reason of infringement              and bonding. See id. On October 27,
                                                Determination Finding a Section 337                     of certain claims of the ’655 patent and              2017, the parties filed written
                                                Violation; Issuance of a Limited                        the ’373 patent (collectively, ‘‘the                  submissions in response to the October
                                                Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist                    asserted patents’’). Id. The notice of                12, 2017 Notice, and on November 3,
                                                Order; Termination of the Investigation                 investigation identified CJ CheilJedang               2017, the parties filed responses to each
                                                                                                        Corp. of Seoul, Republic of Korea; CJ                 other’s submissions.
                                                AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                        America, Inc. (‘‘CJ America’’) of                        Having examined the record of this
                                                Commission.
                                                                                                        Downers Grove, Illinois; and PT                       investigation, including the FID, the RD,
                                                ACTION: Notice.                                         CheilJedang Indonesia of Jakarta,                     and the parties’ submissions, the
                                                SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that                 Indonesia (collectively ‘‘CJ’’ or                     Commission has determined to:
                                                the U.S. International Trade                            ‘‘Respondents’’) as respondents in this                  (1) Reverse the FID’s finding that the
                                                Commission has found a violation of                     investigation. See id. The Office of                  accused products do not infringe claim
                                                section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930                   Unfair Import Investigations is not a                 10 of the ’373 patent;
                                                (‘‘section 337’’), as amended, in this                  party to the investigation.                              (2) reverse the FID’s finding that the
                                                investigation. The Commission has                          On April 17, 2017, the ALJ issued an               domestic industry requirement is not
                                                issued a limited exclusion order                        initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting               satisfied for the ’373 patent.
                                                prohibiting the importation of certain L-               Complainants’ unopposed motion for                       (3) Reverse the FID’s finding that
                                                tryptophan and L-tryptophan products                    summary determination that they satisfy               claim 10 of the ’373 patent is invalid
                                                that infringe claim 10 of U.S. Patent No.               the economic prong of the domestic                    under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph,
                                                6,180,373 (‘‘the ’373 patent’’) or claim                industry requirement under 19 U.S.C.                  for indefiniteness;
                                                20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,666,655 (‘‘the                  1337(a)(3)(A) and (B) for both asserted                  (4) reverse the FID’s finding that claim
                                                ’655 patent’’). The Commission has also                 patents. See Order No. 18, unreviewed,                10 of the ’373 patent is invalid under 35
                                                issued a cease and desist order directed                Comm’n Notice (May 17, 2017).                         U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, for lack of
                                                to the domestic respondent. The                                                                               written description;
                                                                                                           On August 11, 2017, the ALJ issued                    (5) affirm the FID’s finding that claim
                                                investigation is terminated.                            his final initial determination (‘‘FID’’)             10 of the ’373 patent is not invalid
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        finding no violation of section 337.                  under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, for
                                                Houda Morad, Office of the General                      Specifically, the FID finds that: (1)                 lack of enablement;
                                                Counsel, U.S. International Trade                       Respondents’ accused products do not                     (6) affirm the FID’s finding that claim
                                                Commission, 500 E Street SW,                            infringe the asserted claims of the ’373              10 of the ’373 patent is not invalid
                                                Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)                   or the ’655 patents either literally or               under 35 U.S.C. 103 for obviousness;
                                                708–4716. Copies of non-confidential                    under the doctrine of equivalents; (2)                   (7) affirm in part and reverse in part
                                                documents filed in connection with this                 claim 10 of the ’373 patent is invalid for            the FID’s finding that the accused
                                                investigation are or will be available for              indefiniteness and lack of written                    products do not infringe claim 20 of the
                                                inspection during official business                     description; (3) claim 20 of the ’655                 ’655 patent;
                                                hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the                   patent is invalid for lack of written                    (8) reverse the FID’s finding that the
                                                Office of the Secretary, U.S.                           description; and (4) Complainants’                    domestic industry requirement is not
                                                International Trade Commission, 500 E                   products do not satisfy the technical                 satisfied for the ’655 patent.
                                                Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,                        prong of the domestic industry                           (9) Affirm the FID’s finding that claim
                                                telephone (202) 205–2000. General                       requirement with respect to the ’655 or               20 of the ’655 patent is not invalid
                                                information concerning the Commission                   the ’373 patents. In addition, the ALJ                under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph,
                                                may also be obtained by accessing its                   issued a Recommended Determination
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                              for indefiniteness.
                                                internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.               (‘‘RD’’) recommending, should the                        (10) Reverse the FID’s finding that
                                                The public record for this investigation                Commission find a section 337                         claim 20 of the ’655 patent is invalid
                                                may be viewed on the Commission’s                       violation, that the Commission issue: (1)             under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, for
                                                electronic docket (EDIS) at https://                    A limited exclusion order against                     lack of written description; and
                                                edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                        Respondents’ accused products; and (2)                   (11) affirm all other findings in the
                                                persons are advised that information on                 a cease and desist order against                      FID that are not inconsistent with the
                                                this matter can be obtained by                          Respondent CJ America. The RD further                 Commission’s determination.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:59 Dec 21, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00068   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM   22DEN1


                                                60764                       Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 245 / Friday, December 22, 2017 / Notices

                                                   Accordingly, the Commission finds                      Dated: December 19, 2017.                             (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
                                                that there is a violation of section 337                Rebecca A. Womeldorf,                                 clarity of the information to be
                                                with respect to both asserted patents.                  Rules Committee Secretary.                            collected; and
                                                The Commission has determined the                       [FR Doc. 2017–27614 Filed 12–21–17; 8:45 am]            (4) Minimize the burden of the
                                                appropriate remedy is a limited                         BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
                                                                                                                                                              collection of information on those who
                                                exclusion order against Respondents’                                                                          are to respond, including through the
                                                accused products, and a cease and                                                                             use of appropriate automated,
                                                desist order against Respondent CJ                                                                            electronic, mechanical, or other
                                                                                                        DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                America. The Commission has also                                                                              technological collection techniques or
                                                determined that the public interest                     [OMB Number 1122–0011]                                other forms of information technology,
                                                factors enumerated in subsections                                                                             e.g., permitting electronic submission of
                                                                                                        Agency Information Collection                         responses.
                                                337(d)(l) and (f)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(l),
                                                                                                        Activities; Proposed eCollection
                                                (f)(1)) do not preclude issuance of the                                                                       Overview of This Information
                                                                                                        eComments Requested; Extension of a
                                                limited exclusion order and cease and                                                                         Collection
                                                                                                        Currently Approved Collection
                                                desist order. The Commission has
                                                further determined to set a bond at zero                AGENCY:  Office on Violence Against                      (1) Type of Information Collection:
                                                (0) percent of entered value during the                                                                       Extension of a currently approved
                                                                                                        Women, Department of Justice.
                                                Presidential review period (19 U.S.C.                                                                         collection.
                                                                                                        ACTION: 30-Day notice.                                   (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Semi-
                                                1337(j)).
                                                                                                        SUMMARY:   The Department of Justice,                 Annual Progress Report for Grantees
                                                   The Commission’s orders and opinion                                                                        from the Grants to Support Tribal
                                                                                                        Office on Violence Against Women
                                                were delivered to the President and to                                                                        Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault
                                                                                                        (OVW) will be submitting the following
                                                the United States Trade Representative                                                                        Coalitions Program (Tribal Coalitions
                                                                                                        information collection request to the
                                                on the day of their issuance.                                                                                 Program).
                                                                                                        Office of Management and Budget
                                                   The authority for the Commission’s                   (OMB) for review and approval in                         (3) Agency form number, if any, and
                                                determination is contained in section                   accordance with the Paperwork                         the applicable component of the
                                                337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed                   Department of Justice sponsoring the
                                                amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part                   information collection was previously                 collection: Form Number: 1122–0011.
                                                210 of the Commission’s Rules of                        published in the Federal Register on                  U.S. Department of Justice, Office on
                                                Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                     September 9, 2017, allowing for a 60                  Violence Against Women.
                                                210).                                                   day comment period.                                      (4) Affected public who will be asked
                                                                                                                                                              or required to respond, as well as a brief
                                                  By order of the Commission.                           DATES: Comments are encouraged and
                                                                                                                                                              abstract: The affected public includes
                                                  Issued: December 18, 2017.                            will be accepted for 30 days until                    the 14 grantees from the Tribal
                                                Lisa R. Barton,                                         January 22, 2018.                                     Coalitions Program. The Tribal
                                                Secretary to the Commission.                            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      Coalitions Program grantees include
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–27567 Filed 12–21–17; 8:45 am]            Written comments and/or suggestion                    Indian tribal governments that will
                                                BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                  regarding the items contained in this                 support the development and operation
                                                                                                        notice, especially the estimated public               of new or existing nonprofit tribal
                                                                                                        burden and associated response time,                  domestic violence and sexual assault
                                                                                                        should be directed to Cathy Poston,                   coalitions in Indian country. These
                                                JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE                              Office on Violence Against Women, at                  grants provide funds to develop and
                                                UNITED STATES                                           202–514–5430 or Catherine.poston@                     operate nonprofit tribal domestic
                                                                                                        usdoj.gov. Written comments and/or                    violence and sexual assault coalitions in
                                                Hearings of the Judicial Conference                     suggestions can also be sent to the                   Indian country to address the unique
                                                Advisory Committee on the Federal                       Office of Management and Budget,                      issues that confront Indian victims. The
                                                Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure                           Office of Information and Regulatory                  Tribal Coalitions Program provides
                                                                                                        Affairs, Attention Department of Justice              resources for organizing and supporting
                                                AGENCY:  Advisory Committee on the                      Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530 or                 efforts to end violence against Indian
                                                Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,                  sent to OIRA_submissions@                             women.
                                                Judicial Conference of the United States.               omb.eop.gov.                                             (5) An estimate of the total number of
                                                ACTION: Notice of cancellation of public                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written                    respondents and the amount of time
                                                hearing.                                                comments and suggestions from the                     estimated for an average respondent to
                                                                                                        public and affected agencies concerning               respond/reply: It is estimated that it will
                                                SUMMARY:  The following public hearing                  the proposed collection of information                take the 14 respondents (grantees from
                                                on proposed amendments to the Federal                   are encouraged. Your comments should                  the Tribal Coalitions Program)
                                                Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been                  address one or more of the following                  approximately one hour to complete a
                                                canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing on                   four points:                                          Semi-Annual Progress Report. The
                                                January 17, 2018, in Washington, DC.                      (1) Evaluate whether the proposed                   Semi-Annual Progress Report is divided
                                                                                                        collection of information is necessary                into sections that pertain to the different
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                        for the proper performance of the                     types of activities that grantees may
                                                Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                        functions of the agency, including                    engage in with grant funds. Grantees
                                                Committee Secretary, Rules Committee
                                                                                                        whether the information will have                     must complete only those sections that
                                                Staff, Administrative Office of the
                                                                                                        practical utility;                                    are relevant to their activities.
                                                United States Courts, Washington, DC                      (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the                       (6) An estimate of the total public
                                                20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.                        agency’s estimate of the burden of the                burden (in hours) associated with the
                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              proposed collection of information,                   collection: The total annual hour burden
                                                Announcement for this hearing was                       including the validity of the                         to complete the data collection forms is
                                                previously published in 82 FR 37610.                    methodology and assumptions used;                     28 hours, that is 14 grantees completing


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:59 Dec 21, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00069   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM   22DEN1



Document Created: 2017-12-22 00:34:23
Document Modified: 2017-12-22 00:34:23
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactHouda Morad, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation82 FR 60763 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR