82 FR 61203 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 247 (December 27, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 247 (December 27, 2017)
| Page Range | 61203-61205 | |
| FR Document | 2017-27950 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 61203-61205] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-27950] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0737; FRL-9972-57-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District (NSAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of particulate matter (PM) from wood burning devices. We are proposing to approve a local measure to reduce emissions from these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Any comments must arrive by January 26, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2017-0737 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to Doris Lo, at [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rynda Kay, EPA Region IX, (415) 947- 4118, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What measure did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of this measure? C. What is the purpose of the submitted measure? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Proposed Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the measure? B. Does the measure meet the evaluation criteria? C. Public Comment and Proposed Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What measure did the State submit? Table 1 lists the measure addressed by this proposal with the dates that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 1--Submitted Measure ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Resolution No. Measure title Adopted Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NSAQMD............................ 2017-01 Northern Sierra Air 01/23/17 02/28/17 Quality Management District Resolution #2017-01. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On August 28, 2017, the submittal for the NSAQMD measure was deemed by operation of law to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of this measure? There are no previous versions of the NSAQMD measure in the SIP. C. What is the purpose of the submitted measure? Particulate matter, including PM with diameters that are generally 2.5 microns or smaller (PM2.5 ) and PM with diameters that are generally 10 microns or smaller (PM10 ), contributes to effects that are harmful to human health and [[Page 61204]] the environment, including premature mortality, aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular disease, decreased lung function, visibility impairment, and damage to vegetation and ecosystems. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that control PM emissions. On January 15, 2013, the EPA revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM2.5 to provide increased protection of public health by lowering the level of the annual standards from 15 to 12 micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\) (40 CFR 50.18). Effective April 15, 2015, the EPA designated and classified the Plumas County nonattainment area (NAA) as moderate nonattainment for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS (40 CFR 81.305; 80 FR 2206, 2218). CARB submitted the NSAQMD measure on February 28, 2017, as part of an attainment plan to address nonattainment area SIP requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS in the Plumas County NAA. The submitted measure is an enforceable commitment by the NSAQMD to implement a woodstove change-out incentive program during the 2016-2022 timeframe in accordance with specific program requirements that are designed to achieve quantifiable, surplus, enforceable, and permanent PM2.5 emission reductions in the Plumas County NAA. The program requirements ensure, among other things, that older, dirtier wood stoves currently in operation in the Plumas County NAA will be replaced with EPA-certified wood stoves or other less-polluting devices. The woodstove change-out program is funded by the EPA's 2015 Targeted Air Shed Grant Program, the NSAQMD, and other agencies and is the primary control strategy in California's attainment plan for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS in the Plumas County NAA. The enforceable commitment obligates the NSAQMD to achieve specific amounts of PM2.5 emission reductions through implementation of the woodstove change-out program by specific years, to submit annual reports to the EPA detailing its implementation of the program and the projected emission reductions, and to adopt and submit substitute measures by specific dates if the EPA determines that the woodstove change-out program will not achieve the necessary emission reductions. The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about this measure. We intend to evaluate California's PM2.5 attainment plan for the Plumas County NAA as a whole through a subsequent notice-and- comment rulemaking action. II. The EPA's Evaluation and Proposed Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the measure? Generally, SIP control measures must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). The CAA explicitly provides for the use of economic incentive programs (EIPs) as one tool for states to use to achieve attainment of the NAAQS (see, e.g., CAA sections 110(a)(2)(A), 172(c)(6), and 183(e)(4)). EIPs use market-based strategies to encourage the reduction of emissions from stationary, area, and mobile sources in an efficient manner. EPA has promulgated regulations for statutory EIPs required under section 182(g) of the Act and has issued guidance for discretionary EIPs (see 59 FR 16690 (April 7, 1994), codified at 40 CFR part 51, subpart U and U.S. EPA, ``Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Programs,'' January 2001 (``2001 EIP Guidance'')).\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ A ``discretionary economic incentive program'' is ``any EIP submitted to the EPA as an implementation plan revision for purposes other than to comply with the statutory requirements of sections 182(g)(3), 182(g)(5), 187(d)(3), or 187(g) of the Act.'' 40 CFR 51.491. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA's guidance documents addressing EIPs and other nontraditional programs provide for some flexibility in meeting established SIP requirements for enforceability and quantification of emission reductions, provided the State takes clear responsibility for ensuring that the emission reductions necessary to meet applicable CAA requirements are achieved. Accordingly, EPA has consistently stated that nontraditional emission reduction measures submitted to satisfy SIP requirements under the Act must be accompanied by appropriate ``enforceable commitments'' from the State to monitor emission reductions achieved and to rectify shortfalls in a timely manner (see, e.g., U.S. EPA, ``Incorporating Emerging and Voluntary Measures in a State Implementation Plan (SIP),'' September 2004 (``2004 Emerging and Voluntary Measures Guidance'') at pages 8-12 and U.S. EPA, ``Guidance for Quantifying and Using Emission Reductions from Voluntary Woodstove Changeout Programs in State Implementation Plans,'' January 2006 (``2006 Woodstove Guidance'') at page 7). The EPA has also consistently stated that, where a State intends to rely on a nontraditional program to satisfy CAA requirements, the State must demonstrate that the program achieves emission reductions that are quantifiable, surplus, enforceable, and permanent (see, e.g., 2001 EIP Guidance at Section 4.1 and 2006 Woodstove Guidance at 3-4). Guidance documents that we use to evaluate discretionary EIPs and other nontraditional emission reduction programs include the following:``Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Programs'' January 2001 (EPA-452/R-01-001) (``2001 EIP Guidance''). ``Incorporating Emerging and Voluntary Measure in a State Implementation Plan (SIP),'' Stephen D. Page, OAQPS, October 4, 2004 (``2004 Emerging and Voluntary Measures Guidance''). ``Guidance on Incorporating Bundled Measures in a State Implementation Plan,'' Stephen D. Page, OAQPS, and Margo Oge, OTAQ, August 16, 2005 (``2005 Bundled Measures Guidance''). ``Guidance for Quantifying and Using Emission Reductions from Voluntary Woodstove Changeout Programs in State Implementation Plans,'' January 2006 (EPA-456/B-06-001) (``2006 Woodstove Guidance''). B. Does the measure meet the evaluation criteria? The submitted commitment contains clear, nondiscretionary and mandatory obligations that are enforceable against the NSAQMD and ensure that information about the emission reductions achieved through the woodstove change-out program will be readily available to the public through the NSAQMD's submission of annual reports to the EPA. Our approval of this commitment would make these obligations enforceable by the EPA and by citizens under the CAA. The commitment obligates the District to implement a new program that achieves quantifiable, surplus, permanent, and enforceable PM 2.5 emission reductions and does not alter any existing SIP requirements. Our approval of the commitment into the SIP would strengthen the SIP and would not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements, consistent with the requirements of CAA section 110(l). Section 193 of the CAA does not apply [[Page 61205]] to this action because this measure does not modify any SIP control requirement that was in effect before November 15, 1990. We are proposing to find that the submitted measure satisfies CAA requirements for enforceability, SIP revisions, and nontraditional emission reduction programs as interpreted in EPA guidance documents. The TSD contains more information on our evaluation of this measure. C. Public Comment and Proposed Action The EPA proposes to fully approve the submitted measure under CAA section 110(k)(3) based on a conclusion that the measure satisfies all applicable requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until January 26, 2018. If we take final action to approve the submitted measure, our final action will incorporate this measure into the federally enforceable SIP. III. Incorporation by Reference In this action, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the NSAQMD measure described in Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: December 14, 2017. Deborah Jordan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2017-27950 Filed 12-26-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules 61203
• does not have federalism Dated: December 12, 2017. information you consider to be
implications as specified in Executive Cosmo Servidio, Confidential Business Information (CBI)
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Regional Administrator, Region III. or other information whose disclosure is
1999); [FR Doc. 2017–27522 Filed 12–26–17; 8:45 am] restricted by statute. Multimedia
• is not an economically significant BILLING CODE 6560–50–P submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
regulatory action based on health or accompanied by a written comment.
safety risks subject to Executive Order The written comment is considered the
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION official comment and should include
AGENCY discussion of all points you wish to
• is not a significant regulatory action make. The EPA will generally not
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 40 CFR Part 52 consider comments or comment
28355, May 22, 2001); contents located outside of the primary
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0737; FRL–9972–57–
• is not subject to requirements of Region 9] submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
Section 12(d) of the National other file sharing system). For
Technology Transfer and Advancement Approval of California Air Plan additional submission methods, please
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because Revisions, Northern Sierra Air Quality contact the person identified in the FOR
application of those requirements would Management District FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
be inconsistent with the CAA; and For the full EPA public comment policy,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
• does not provide EPA with the information about CBI or multimedia
Agency (EPA).
discretionary authority to address, as submissions, and general guidance on
ACTION: Proposed rule. making effective comments, please visit
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
practicable and legally permissible Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a commenting-epa-dockets.
methods, under Executive Order 12898 revision to the Northern Sierra Air FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Quality Management District Rynda Kay, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
(NSAQMD) portion of the California 4118, kay.rynda@epa.gov.
This action amending the definition
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of VOC in the Virginia SIP to conform
revision concerns emissions of Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
with the regulatory definition of VOC in
particulate matter (PM) from wood and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
40 CFR 51.100(s) is not approved to
burning devices. We are proposing to
apply on any Indian reservation land as Table of Contents
approve a local measure to reduce
defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151 or in any emissions from these emission sources I. The State’s Submittal
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the A. What measure did the State submit?
has demonstrated that a tribe has Act). We are taking comments on this B. Are there other versions of this measure?
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian proposal and plan to follow with a final C. What is the purpose of the submitted
country, the rule does not have tribal action. measure?
implications and will not impose II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Proposed
DATES: Any comments must arrive by Action
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as January 26, 2018. A. How is the EPA evaluating the measure?
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, B. Does the measure meet the evaluation
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– criteria?
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
OAR–2017–0737 at http:// C. Public Comment and Proposed Action
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 www.regulations.gov, or via email to III. Incorporation by Reference
Doris Lo, at lo.doris@epa.gov. For IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Environmental protection, Air comments submitted at Regulations.gov, I. The State’s Submittal
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, follow the online instructions for
Incorporation by reference, submitting comments. Once submitted, A. What measure did the State submit?
Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, comments cannot be removed or edited Table 1 lists the measure addressed by
Reporting and recordkeeping from Regulations.gov. For either manner this proposal with the dates that it was
requirements, Volatile organic of submission, the EPA may publish any adopted by the local air agency and
compounds. comment received to its public docket. submitted by the California Air
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Do not submit electronically any Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED MEASURE
Local agency Resolution No. Measure title Adopted Submitted
NSAQMD ............ 2017–01 Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District Resolution #2017–01 ... 01/23/17 02/28/17
On August 28, 2017, the submittal for B. Are there other versions of this C. What is the purpose of the submitted
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
the NSAQMD measure was deemed by measure? measure?
operation of law to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 There are no previous versions of the Particulate matter, including PM with
Appendix V, which must be met before NSAQMD measure in the SIP. diameters that are generally 2.5 microns
formal EPA review. or smaller (PM2.5) and PM with
diameters that are generally 10 microns
or smaller (PM10), contributes to effects
that are harmful to human health and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:10 Dec 26, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM 27DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_61450/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules 61205
to this action because this measure does action because SIP approvals are ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
not modify any SIP control requirement exempted under Executive Order 12866; AGENCY
that was in effect before November 15, • Does not impose an information
1990. collection burden under the provisions 40 CFR Part 80
We are proposing to find that the of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2017–0655; FRL–9972–59–
submitted measure satisfies CAA U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); OAR]
requirements for enforceability, SIP
• Is certified as not having a RIN 2060–AT82
revisions, and nontraditional emission
significant economic impact on a
reduction programs as interpreted in
substantial number of small entities Proposed Rule; Renewable Fuel
EPA guidance documents. The TSD
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Standard Program; Grain Sorghum Oil
contains more information on our
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Pathway
evaluation of this measure.
• Does not contain any unfunded AGENCY: Environmental Protection
C. Public Comment and Proposed mandate or significantly or uniquely
Action Agency (EPA).
affect small governments, as described
ACTION: Proposed rule.
The EPA proposes to fully approve in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
the submitted measure under CAA of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); SUMMARY: In this proposed rule, the
section 110(k)(3) based on a conclusion • Does not have Federalism Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
that the measure satisfies all applicable implications as specified in Executive is providing an opportunity to comment
requirements. We will accept comments Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, on an analysis of the lifecycle
from the public on this proposal until 1999); greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
January 26, 2018. If we take final action • Is not an economically significant associated with certain biofuels that are
to approve the submitted measure, our regulatory action based on health or produced from grain sorghum oil
final action will incorporate this safety risks subject to Executive Order extracted at dry mill ethanol plants at
measure into the federally enforceable 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); any point downstream from sorghum
SIP. grinding, also known as distiller
• Is not a significant regulatory action
III. Incorporation by Reference subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR sorghum oil. EPA seeks comment on its
28355, May 22, 2001); proposed assessment that using
In this action, the EPA is proposing to distillers sorghum oil as feedstock
include in a final EPA rule regulatory • Is not subject to requirements of results in no significant agricultural
text that includes incorporation by Section 12(d) of the National sector GHG emissions; and that
reference. In accordance with Technology Transfer and Advancement biodiesel and heating oil produced from
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because distillers sorghum oil via a
proposing to incorporate by reference application of those requirements would transesterification process, and
the NSAQMD measure described in be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; renewable diesel, jet fuel, heating oil,
Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA has and naphtha, and liquefied petroleum gas
made, and will continue to make, these • Does not provide the EPA with the (LPG) produced from distillers sorghum
materials available through discretionary authority to address oil via a hydrotreating process, would
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA disproportionate human health or meet the lifecycle GHG emissions
Region IX Office (please contact the environmental effects with practical, reduction threshold of 50 percent
person identified in the FOR FURTHER appropriate, and legally permissible required for advanced biofuels, and
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this methods under Executive Order 12898 biomass-based diesel under the
preamble for more information). (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Renewable Fuel Standard program.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order In addition, the SIP is not approved to Based on these analyses, EPA is
Reviews apply on any Indian reservation land or proposing to amend the RFS program
in any other area where the EPA or an regulations to define the term ‘‘distillers
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a sorghum oil’’. We also propose to add to
Administrator is required to approve a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of the regulations approved pathways from
SIP submission that complies with the
Indian country, the rule does not have the production of biodiesel and heating
provisions of the Act and applicable
tribal implications and will not impose oil from distillers sorghum oil via a
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
substantial direct costs on tribal transesterification process, and
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
governments or preempt tribal law as renewable diesel, jet fuel, heating oil,
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 naphtha, and liquefied petroleum gas
approve state choices, provided that
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). (LPG) produced from distillers sorghum
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
oil via a hydrotreating process.
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
merely proposes to approve state law as DATES: Comments must be received on
meeting federal requirements and does Environmental protection, Air or before January 26, 2018.
not impose additional requirements pollution control, Incorporation by ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
beyond those imposed by state law. For reference, Intergovernmental relations, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
that reason, this proposed action: Particulate matter, Reporting and OAR–2017–0655, at http://
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory recordkeeping requirements. www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
action’’ subject to review by the Office Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. instructions for submitting comments.
of Management and Budget under Once submitted, comments cannot be
Dated: December 14, 2017. edited or withdrawn from
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Deborah Jordan, Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
January 21, 2011); Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. any comment received to its public
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 [FR Doc. 2017–27950 Filed 12–26–17; 8:45 am] docket. Do not submit electronically any
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory BILLING CODE 6560–50–P information you consider to be
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:10 Dec 26, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM 27DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_61450/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-27 02:22:40
Document Modified: 2017-12-27 02:22:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Any comments must arrive by January 26, 2018. | |
| Contact | Rynda Kay, EPA Region IX, (415) 947- 4118, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 61203 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR