82 FR 8235 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the PRISM Price Improvement Auction in BX Chapter VI, Section 9 and To Make Pilot Program Permanent
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 14 (January 24, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 14 (January 24, 2017)
| Page Range | 8235-8238 | |
| FR Document | 2017-01467 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 24, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 8235-8238] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-01467] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-79812; File No. SR-BX-2016-063] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the PRISM Price Improvement Auction in BX Chapter VI, Section 9 and To Make Pilot Program Permanent January 17, 2017. I. Introduction On November 21, 2016, NASDAQ BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the eligibility requirements for its Price Improvement Auction mechanism (``PRISM'' or ``Auction'') and make permanent those aspects of the PRISM auction that are currently operating on a pilot basis. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 9, 2016.\3\ The Commission received no comments regarding the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79465 (December 5, 2016), 81 FR 89167 (``Notice''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposal The Exchange established PRISM in November 2015 as a price improvement mechanism.\4\ Pursuant to Chapter VI, Section 9 of the BX Options Rules, a Participant (an ``Initiating Participant'') may electronically submit for execution an order it represents as agent on behalf of a Public Customer,\5\ Professional customer, broker dealer, or any other entity (``PRISM Order'') against principal interest or against any other order it represents as agent (an ``Initiating Order''), provided it submits the PRISM Order for electronic execution into the Auction. Parts of PRISM are currently operating on a pilot basis (``Pilot''),\6\ which is set to expire on January 18, 2017.\7\ The Exchange proposes to make the Pilot permanent, and also proposes to amend the Auction eligibility requirements for certain PRISM Orders of less than 50 option contracts. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 76301 (October 29, 2015), 80 FR 68347 (November 4, 2015) (SR-BX-2015-032) (``PRISM Approval Order''). \5\ A Public Customer means a person that is not a broker or dealer in securities. See Chapter I, Section 1(a)(50) of the BX Options Rules. A ``Professional'' means any person or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). A Participant or a Public Customer may, without limitation, be a Professional. All Professional orders shall be appropriately marked by Participants. See Chapter I, Section 1(a)(49) of the BX Options Rules. For purposes of PRISM rule, a Public Customer order does not include a Professional order. See Chapter VI, Section 9 of the BX Options Rules. \6\ Three components of PRISM were approved by the Commission on a pilot basis: (1) The early conclusion of the PRISM Auction; (2) the provision that an unrelated market or marketable limit order (against the BX BBO) on the opposite side of the market from the PRISM Order received during the Auction will not cause the Auction to end early and will execute against interest outside of the Auction; and (3) no minimum size requirement of orders. \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78249 (July 7, 2016), 81 FR 45334 (July 13, 2016) (SR-BX-2016-038). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. PRISM Eligibility Requirements for PRISM Orders of Fewer Than 50 Contracts Currently, a PRISM Auction may be initiated if certain conditions are met. If the PRISM Order is for the account of a Public Customer, the Initiating Participant must stop the entire PRISM Order at a price that is equal to or better than the National Best Bid/Offer (``NBBO'') on the opposite side of the market from the PRISM Order, provided that such price must be at least one minimum trading increment (specified in Chapter VI, Section 5 of the BX Options Rules) better than any limit order on the limit order book on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order.\8\ If the PRISM Order is for the account of a broker dealer or any other person or entity that is not a Public Customer, the Initiating Participant must stop the entire PRISM Order at a price that is the better of: (i) The BX BBO price improved by at least the minimum trading increment on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order, or (ii) the PRISM Order's limit price (if the order is a limit order), provided in either case that such price is at or better than the NBBO.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(A) of the BX Options Rules. \9\ See Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(B) of the BX Options Rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- BX proposes to amend the Auction eligibility requirements to require that, if the PRISM Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, the Initiating Participant must stop the entire PRISM Order at one minimum price improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the PRISM Order, and better than any limit order on the limit order book on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order. Thus, BX would require that the PRISM Order receive at least $0.01 price improvement if that PRISM Order is for less than 50 contracts and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01. This requirement will apply regardless of whether the PRISM Order is for the account of a Public Customer, or where the PRISM Order is for the account of a broker dealer or any other person or entity that is not a Public Customer. The Exchange will retain the current requirements for Auction eligibility in all other instances. Accordingly, if the PRISM Order is for the account of a Public Customer and such order is for 50 option contracts or more or if the difference between the NBBO is greater than $0.01, the Initiating Participant must stop the entire PRISM Order at a price that is equal to or better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the PRISM Order, provided that such price must be at least one minimum trading increment better than any limit order on the limit order book on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order. If the PRISM Order is for the account of a broker dealer or any other person or entity that is not a Public Customer and such order is for 50 option contracts or more, or if the difference between the NBBO is greater than $0.01, the Initiating Participant must stop the entire PRISM Order at a price that is the better of: (i) The BX BBO price improved by at least the Minimum Increment on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order, or (ii) the PRISM Order's limit price (if the order is a limit order), provided in [[Page 8236]] either case that such price is at or better than the NBBO.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ The Exchange also proposes to add language to Chapter VI, Section 9(i) of the BX Options Rules to clarify that, if any of the auction eligibility criteria are not met, the PRISM Order will be rejected. The Exchange will also add language to Chapter VI, Section 9(i) to clarify the treatment of paired Public Customer-to-Public Customer orders pursuant to subparagraph (vi) as a result of these proposed changes. Specifically, Exchange will allow a PRISM Order to trade on either the bid or offer, pursuant to subparagraph (vi), if the NBBO is $0.01 wide, provided (1) the execution price is equal to or within the NBBO, (2) there is no resting customer at the execution price, and (3) $0.01 is the Minimum Price Variation (MPV) of the option. The Exchange also proposes to add language that it will continue to reject a PRISM Order to buy (sell) if the NBBO is only $0.01 wide and the Agency order is stopped on the bid (offer) if there is a resting order on the bid (offer). These requirements are unchanged from the Exchange's current handling practices of paired Public Customer-to-Public Customer PRISM Orders per subparagraph (vi), and the Exchange's current practice of rejecting PRISM Orders to buy (sell) if the NBBO is only $0.01 wide and the Agency order is stopped on the bid (offer) if there is a resting order on the bid (offer). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that these changes to PRISM may provide additional opportunities for PRISM Orders of fewer than 50 option contracts to receive price improvement over the NBBO where the difference in the NBBO is $0.01 and therefore encourage the increased submission of orders of fewer than 50 option contracts.\11\ The Exchange notes that the statistics for the current pilot, which include, among other things, price improvement for orders of fewer than 50 option contracts under the current auction eligibility requirements, show relatively small amounts of price improvement for such orders.\12\ BX believes that the proposed requirements will therefore increase the price improvement that orders of fewer than 50 option contracts may receive in PRISM.\13\ The Exchange also notes that NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx'') operates a similar price improvement mechanism, PIXL, which has been operating for a longer period of time and has generated similar pilot data.\14\ Given the similarly between the two mechanisms, the Exchange expects that PRISM, if operated on a pilot basis over a longer period of time, would continue to generate data that is comparable to PIXL.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 89169. \12\ See id. \13\ See id. \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63027 (October 1, 2010), 75 FR 62160 (October 7, 2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-108). \15\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 89169. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Pilot Program Three components of PRISM were approved by the Commission on a pilot basis: (1) The early conclusion of the PRISM Auction; \16\ (2) the provision that an unrelated market or marketable limit order (against the BX BBO) on the opposite side of the market from the PRISM Order received during the Auction will not cause the Auction to end early and will execute against interest outside of the Auction; \17\ and (3) no minimum size requirement of orders. The provisions were approved for a pilot period that currently expires on January 18, 2017.\18\ The Exchange proposes to have the Pilot approved on a permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(B)(4) of the BX Options Rules. \17\ See Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(D) of the BX Options Rules. \18\ See PRISM Approval Order, supra note 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- During the Pilot period, the Exchange submitted certain data periodically as required by the Commission, to provide supporting evidence that, among other things, there is meaningful competition for all size orders, there is significant price improvement available through PRISM, and that there is an active and liquid market functioning on the Exchange outside of the Auction mechanism.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See Chapter VI, Section 9(vii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. No Minimum Size Requirement Chapter VI, Section 9(vii) provides that, as part of the current Pilot, there will be no minimum size requirement for orders to be eligible for the Auction. The Exchange believes that the data gathered since the approval of the Pilot, which it discussed in the Notice, establishes that there is liquidity and competition both within PRISM and outside of PRISM, and that there are opportunities for significant price improvement within PRISM.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 89169. See also Exhibit 3 to SR-BX-2016-063. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also has gathered information about activity in orders for less than 50 and 50 contracts or greater for PRISM auctions between January and June 2016. For auctions occurring during that period, 87.8% of auctions were for orders for less than 50 contracts, a percentage that remained stable over that time period. Auctions for orders of less than 50 contracts accounted for 30.0% of the contract volume traded in PRISM. Auctions of 50 contracts or more made up 12.2% of all PRISM auctions and accounted for 70.0% of contracts traded in PRISM.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 89369. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to price improvement, 60.5% of PRISM auctions between January and June 2016 executed at a price that was better than the NBBO at the time the auction began.\22\ For auctions of less than 50 contracts, 64.7% received price improvement, while 30.5% of auctions for 50 contracts or more received price improvement.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See id. \23\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 89170. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- BX believes that the data gathered during the Pilot period indicates that there is meaningful competition in PRISM auctions for all size orders, there is an active and liquid market functioning on the Exchange outside of the auction mechanism, and that there are opportunities for price improvement for orders executed through PRISM.\24\ The Exchange therefore has requested that the Commission approve the no minimum size requirement on a permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Early Conclusion of the PRISM Auction Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(B)(4) of the BX Options Rules provides that the PRISM Auction shall conclude at the earlier of (1) the end of the Auction period; (2) any time the BX BBO crosses the PRISM Order stop price on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order; or (3) any time there is a trading halt on the Exchange in the affected series.\25\ The latter two conditions are operating as part of the current Pilot. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ If the situations described in either of the two latter conditions occur, the entire PRISM Order will be executed at: (1) In the case of the BX BBO crossing the PRISM Order stop price, the best response price(s) or, if the stop price is the best price in the Auction, at the stop price, unless the best response price is equal to or better than the price of a limit order resting on the Order Book on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order, in which case the PRISM Order will be executed against that response, but at a price that is at least the Minimum Increment better than the price of such limit order at the time of the conclusion of the Auction; or (2) in the case of a trading halt on the Exchange in the affected series, the stop price, in which case the PRISM Order will be executed solely against the Initiating Order. Any unexecuted PAN responses will be cancelled. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As with the no minimum size requirement, the Exchange has gathered data on these latter two conditions. Between January and June 2016, one auction terminated early because the BX BBO crossed the PRISM Order stop price. No auctions terminated early because of halts. The number of auctions that terminated early was less than 1/100th of 1% of all PRISM auctions over the period. The auctions that terminated early were less than 1/100th of 1% of contracts traded in PRISM auctions.\26\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 89170. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on the data gathered during the pilot, the Exchange does not anticipate that either of these conditions will occur with significant frequency, or will otherwise disrupt the functioning of [[Page 8237]] PRISM auctions.\27\ The Exchange therefore has requested that the Commission approve this aspect of the Pilot on a permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Unrelated Market or Marketable Limit Order Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(D) of the BX Options Rules provides that an unrelated market or marketable limit order (against the BX BBO) on the opposite side of the market from the PRISM Order received during the Auction will not cause the Auction to end early and will execute against interest outside of the Auction. If contracts remain from such unrelated order at the time the auction ends, they will be considered for participation in the order allocation process described elsewhere in the Rule. The Exchange states that the provision is based on a similar provision in the Phlx PIXL mechanism.\28\ In approving this feature on PIXL, also on a pilot basis, the Commission found that ``allowing the PIXL auction to continue for the full auction period despite receipt of unrelated orders outside the Auction would allow the auction to run its full course and, in so doing, will provide a full opportunity for price improvement to the PIXL Order. Further, the unrelated order would be available to participate in the PIXL order allocation.'' \29\ The Exchange does not believe that this provision has had a significant impact on either the unrelated order or the PRISM auction process.\30\ The Exchange therefore has requested that the Commission approve this aspect of the Pilot on a permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ See Phlx Rule 1080(n)(ii)(D). \29\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63027 (October 1, 2010), 75 FR 62160 (October 7, 2010) (SR-PHLX-2010-108). \30\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 89170. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Discussion and Commission Findings After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange and, in particular, with Section 6(b) of the Act.\31\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\32\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect customers, issuers, brokers and dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As part of its proposal, the Exchange provided summary data on Exhibit 3 of its filing for the period January through June 2016, which the Exchange and Commission both publicly posted on their respective Web sites. Among other things, this data is useful in assessing the level of price improvement in the auction, in particular for orders for fewer than 50 contracts; the degree of competition for order flow in such auctions; and a comparison of liquidity in the auctions with liquidity on the Exchange generally.\33\ Based on the data provided by the Exchange, the Commission believes that the Exchange's price improvement auction generally delivers a meaningful opportunity for price improvement to orders, including orders for fewer than 50 contracts, when the spread in the option is $0.02 or more. At the same time, as the Exchange has recognized, the data do not demonstrate that such orders have realized significant price improvement when the NBBO has a bid/ask differential of $0.01.\34\ Recognizing this, the Exchange has proposed to amend the auction eligibility requirements to require price improvement of at least one minimum price improvement increment over the NBBO for PRISM Orders of less than 50 option contracts where the difference in the NBBO is $0.01. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ See Exhibit 3 to SR-BX-2016-063. \34\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 89169. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange's proposal to modify the auction eligibility requirements for orders of fewer than 50 contracts and seek permanent approval of the Pilot, as amended with the new provision, will, in the Commission's view, promote opportunities for price improvement for such orders when the NBBO is $0.01 wide, while continuing to provide opportunities for price improvement when spreads are wider than $0.01. In addition, the Commission has carefully evaluated the PRIME Pilot data and has determined that it would be beneficial to customers and to the options market as a whole to approve on a permanent basis the provisions concerning early conclusion of the PRISM Auction, and the receipt of an unrelated market or marketable limit order (against the BX BBO) on the opposite side of the market from the PRISM Order during the Auction. The Commission notes that there have been few instances of early termination of the PRISM. The Commission further notes that permitting the PRISM Auction to continue despite receipt of unrelated orders outside the Auction would allow the Auction to run its full course and provide a full opportunity for price improvement to the PRISM Order, while allowing the unrelated order to seek an execution, including in the Auction's order allocation. The Commission believes that, particularly for auctions for fewer than 50 contracts when the bid/ask differential is wider than $0.01, the data provided by the Exchange support its proposal to make the Pilot permanent. The data demonstrate that the auction generally provides price improvement opportunities to orders, including orders of retail customers and particularly when the bid/ask differential is wider than $0.01, that there is meaningful competition for orders on the Exchange; and that there exists an active and liquid market functioning on the Exchange outside of the auction.\35\ The Commission further believes that the proposed revisions to the eligibility requirements for PRISM Orders of fewer than 50 contracts with respect to circumstances when the NBBO is $0.01 wide should help to enhance the operation of the auction by providing meaningful opportunities for price improvement in such circumstances, and should benefit investors and others in a manner that is consistent with the Act. Thus, the Commission has determined to approve the Exchange's proposed revisions to Chapter VI, Section 9(i) of the BX Options Rules and to approve the Pilot, as proposed to be modified, on a permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ See Exhibit 3 to SR-BX-2016-063. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\36\ that the proposed rule change (SR-BX-2016-063), be and hereby is approved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). [[Page 8238]] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\37\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-01467 Filed 1-23-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 24, 2017 / Notices 8235
business days between the hours of mechanism.4 Pursuant to Chapter VI, person or entity that is not a Public
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the Section 9 of the BX Options Rules, a Customer, the Initiating Participant
filing also will be available for Participant (an ‘‘Initiating Participant’’) must stop the entire PRISM Order at a
inspection and copying at the principal may electronically submit for execution price that is the better of: (i) The BX
office of the Exchange. All comments an order it represents as agent on behalf BBO price improved by at least the
received will be posted without change; of a Public Customer,5 Professional minimum trading increment on the
the Commission does not edit personal customer, broker dealer, or any other same side of the market as the PRISM
identifying information from entity (‘‘PRISM Order’’) against Order, or (ii) the PRISM Order’s limit
submissions. You should submit only principal interest or against any other price (if the order is a limit order),
information that you wish to make order it represents as agent (an provided in either case that such price
available publicly. All submissions ‘‘Initiating Order’’), provided it submits is at or better than the NBBO.9
should refer to File Number SR– the PRISM Order for electronic BX proposes to amend the Auction
NASDAQ–2017–001 and should be execution into the Auction. Parts of eligibility requirements to require that,
submitted on or before February 14, PRISM are currently operating on a pilot if the PRISM Order is for less than 50
2017. basis (‘‘Pilot’’),6 which is set to expire option contracts, and if the difference
For the Commission, by the Division of
on January 18, 2017.7 The Exchange between the NBBO is $0.01, the
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated proposes to make the Pilot permanent, Initiating Participant must stop the
authority.32 and also proposes to amend the Auction entire PRISM Order at one minimum
Eduardo A. Aleman, eligibility requirements for certain price improvement increment better
PRISM Orders of less than 50 option than the NBBO on the opposite side of
Assistant Secretary.
contracts. the market from the PRISM Order, and
[FR Doc. 2017–01464 Filed 1–23–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P A. PRISM Eligibility Requirements for better than any limit order on the limit
PRISM Orders of Fewer Than 50 order book on the same side of the
Contracts market as the PRISM Order. Thus, BX
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Currently, a PRISM Auction may be would require that the PRISM Order
COMMISSION initiated if certain conditions are met. If receive at least $0.01 price improvement
the PRISM Order is for the account of if that PRISM Order is for less than 50
[Release No. 34–79812; File No. SR–BX– a Public Customer, the Initiating contracts and if the difference between
2016–063] Participant must stop the entire PRISM the NBBO is $0.01. This requirement
Order at a price that is equal to or better will apply regardless of whether the
Self-Regulatory Organizations; than the National Best Bid/Offer PRISM Order is for the account of a
NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Order Granting (‘‘NBBO’’) on the opposite side of the Public Customer, or where the PRISM
Approval of Proposed Rule Change To market from the PRISM Order, provided Order is for the account of a broker
Amend the PRISM Price Improvement that such price must be at least one dealer or any other person or entity that
Auction in BX Chapter VI, Section 9 minimum trading increment (specified is not a Public Customer.
and To Make Pilot Program Permanent in Chapter VI, Section 5 of the BX The Exchange will retain the current
Options Rules) better than any limit requirements for Auction eligibility in
January 17, 2017.
order on the limit order book on the all other instances. Accordingly, if the
I. Introduction same side of the market as the PRISM PRISM Order is for the account of a
On November 21, 2016, NASDAQ BX, Order.8 If the PRISM Order is for the Public Customer and such order is for
Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the account of a broker dealer or any other 50 option contracts or more or if the
Securities and Exchange Commission difference between the NBBO is greater
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to
4 See Securities Exchange Release No. 76301 than $0.01, the Initiating Participant
(October 29, 2015), 80 FR 68347 (November 4, 2015) must stop the entire PRISM Order at a
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities (SR–BX–2015–032) (‘‘PRISM Approval Order’’).
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and 5 A Public Customer means a person that is not
price that is equal to or better than the
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule a broker or dealer in securities. See Chapter I, NBBO on the opposite side of the
change to amend the eligibility Section 1(a)(50) of the BX Options Rules. A market from the PRISM Order, provided
‘‘Professional’’ means any person or entity that (i) that such price must be at least one
requirements for its Price Improvement is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) places
Auction mechanism (‘‘PRISM’’ or more than 390 orders in listed options per day on
minimum trading increment better than
‘‘Auction’’) and make permanent those average during a calendar month for its own any limit order on the limit order book
aspects of the PRISM auction that are beneficial account(s). A Participant or a Public on the same side of the market as the
Customer may, without limitation, be a PRISM Order. If the PRISM Order is for
currently operating on a pilot basis. The Professional. All Professional orders shall be
proposed rule change was published for appropriately marked by Participants. See Chapter
the account of a broker dealer or any
comment in the Federal Register on I, Section 1(a)(49) of the BX Options Rules. For other person or entity that is not a
December 9, 2016.3 The Commission purposes of PRISM rule, a Public Customer order Public Customer and such order is for
does not include a Professional order. See Chapter 50 option contracts or more, or if the
received no comments regarding the VI, Section 9 of the BX Options Rules.
proposal. This order approves the 6 Three components of PRISM were approved by
difference between the NBBO is greater
proposed rule change. the Commission on a pilot basis: (1) The early than $0.01, the Initiating Participant
conclusion of the PRISM Auction; (2) the provision must stop the entire PRISM Order at a
II. Description of the Proposal that an unrelated market or marketable limit order price that is the better of: (i) The BX
(against the BX BBO) on the opposite side of the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange established PRISM in market from the PRISM Order received during the
BBO price improved by at least the
November 2015 as a price improvement Auction will not cause the Auction to end early and Minimum Increment on the same side of
will execute against interest outside of the Auction; the market as the PRISM Order, or (ii)
and (3) no minimum size requirement of orders. the PRISM Order’s limit price (if the
32 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78249
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). (July 7, 2016), 81 FR 45334 (July 13, 2016) (SR–BX–
order is a limit order), provided in
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 2016–038).
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79465 8 See Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(A) of the BX 9 See Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(B) of the BX
(December 5, 2016), 81 FR 89167 (‘‘Notice’’). Options Rules. Options Rules.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:36 Jan 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_8249/page/1.svg)
![8238 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 24, 2017 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s via PULSe to that customer will be
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Statement of the Purpose of, and charged a fee of $500 per month. If that
authority.37 Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule PULSe broker sends drop copies via
Eduardo A. Aleman, Change PULSe to multiple non-TPH customers,
Assistant Secretary. the PULSe broker will be charged the
1. Purpose
[FR Doc. 2017–01467 Filed 1–23–17; 8:45 am] fee for each customer. For example, if
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
The Exchange proposes to amend its PULSe broker A sends drop copies via
Fees Schedule. The Exchange is adding its PULSe workstation to each of non-
fees for functionality related to its TPH customer A, non-TPH customer B
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE PULSe workstation. The Exchange is and non-TPH customer C, PULSe broker
COMMISSION also making minor formatting updates to A (the sending TPH) will be charged a
organize the footnotes in PULSe fee of $1500 per month for drop copies
[Release No. 34–79807; File No. SR–C2– workstation section of its Fees
2017–002] it sends via PULSe to non-TPH
Schedule.3 The fees herein will be customers A, B and C (the receiving
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 effective on January 3, 2017. non-TPHs).
By way of background, the PULSe
Options Exchange, Incorporated; Non-PULSe-to-PULSe Routing
workstation is a front-end order entry
Notice of Filing and Immediate
system designed for use with respect to Upon request, the Exchange provides
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule To
orders that may be sent to the trading customers, both TPH and non-TPH, of
Amend the Fees Schedule
systems of the Exchange. Exchange PULSe brokers with the ability to
January 17, 2017. Trading Permit Holders (‘‘TPHs’’) may transmit orders electronically to PULSe
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the also make workstations available to brokers’ PULSe workstations using
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the their customers, which may include order management systems other than
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 TPHs, non-broker dealer public PULSe (i.e., non-PULSe-to-PULSe).4
notice is hereby given that on January 3, customers and non-TPH broker dealers. These customers utilize the existing
2017, C2 Options Exchange, Drop Copies infrastructure of such systems to send
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) orders to their PULSe brokers
filed with the Securities and Exchange Financial Information eXchange
(‘‘FIX’’) language-based connectivity, electronically.
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the The Exchange is proposing a monthly
proposed rule change as described in upon request, provides customers (both
TPH and non-TPH) of TPHs that are fee payable by TPH customers who
Items I, II, and III below, which Items request non-PULSe-to-PULSe
have been prepared by the Exchange. brokers and PULSe users (‘‘PULSe
brokers’’) with the ability to receive functionality. This fee will allow for the
The Commission is publishing this recoupment of costs of maintaining and
‘‘drop-copy’’ order fill messages from
notice to solicit comments on the supporting non-PULSe-to-PULSe
their PULSe brokers. These fill messages
proposed rule change from interested routing functionality. A TPH customer
allow customers to update positions,
persons. sending orders electronically to PULSe
risk calculations and streamline back-
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s office functions. brokers through these non-PULSe
Statement of the Terms of Substance of The Exchange is proposing a monthly systems will be charged a fee of $500 a
the Proposed Rule Change fee to be assessed on TPHs who are month per PULSe broker to which the
either receiving or sending drop copies customer sends orders. For example, if
The Exchange proposes to amend its TPH customer A transmits orders
via a PULSe workstation. This fee will
Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed electronically through a non-PULSe
allow for the recoupment of costs of
rule change is available on the order management terminal to PULSe
maintaining and supporting drop copy
Exchange’s Web site (http:// workstations of each of PULSe broker A,
functionality. Whether the drop copy
www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the PULSe broker B, and PULSe broker C,
sender or receiver is assessed the fee is
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and TPH customer A (the sending TPH) will
dependent upon whether the customer
at the Commission’s Public Reference be charged a fee of $1500 per month for
receiving the drop copies is a TPH or
Room. the ability to send orders electronically
non-TPH.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s If a customer receiving drop copies is to the PULSe workstations of PULSe
Statement of the Purpose of, and a TPH, that TPH customer (the receiving brokers A, B and C.5 The Exchange does
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule TPH) will be charged a fee of $1000 per not assess any fee, to the PULSe broker
Change month, per PULSe broker from whom it or otherwise, for a non-TPH customer
receives drop copies via PULSe. For electing to use non-PULSe-to-PULSe
In its filing with the Commission, the
example, if TPH customer A receives routing functionality.
Exchange included statements
drop copies from each of PULSe broker
concerning the purpose of and basis for FIX Integration Drop Copy Start-Up/
A, PULSe broker B, and PULSe broker
the proposed rule change and discussed Cancellation Fees
C (all of which are TPHs), TPH A (the
any comments it received on the The Exchange is proposing fees for
receiving TPH) will be charged a fee of
proposed rule change. The text of these both the start-up and cancellation of the
$3000 per month for receiving drop
statements may be examined at the FIX integration needed to send and
copies via PULSe from PULSe brokers
places specified in Item IV below. The
A, B and C (the sending TPHs).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Exchange has prepared summaries, set If a customer receiving drop copies is 4 Non-PULSe-to-PULSe routing is an ‘‘add-on’’
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of a non-TPH, the PULSe broker (the feature to drop copy connectivity. If a TPH or non-
the most significant aspects of such TPH customer of a PULSe brokers elects to send
sending TPH) who sends drop copies orders through its third-party order management
statements. system to its broker’s PULSe workstations, it must
3 The footnotes in the PULSe workstation section also elect to have the drop copy connectivity.
37 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). have been changed from asterisks to numerical 5 In addition, the TPH customer would be charged
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
footnotes to account for the increased volume of $3,000/month for receiving drop copies from the
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. footnotes. three PULSe brokers, as discussed above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:36 Jan 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_8249/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-01 15:12:30
Document Modified: 2018-02-01 15:12:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 8235 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR