83 FR 10650 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Emissions Statement Requirement for the 2008 Ozone Standard
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 48 (March 12, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 48 (March 12, 2018)
| Page Range | 10650-10652 | |
| FR Document | 2018-04813 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 10650-10652] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-04813] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0739; FRL-9975-34-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Emissions Statement Requirement for the 2008 Ozone Standard AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This revision fulfills Pennsylvania's emissions statement requirement for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 11, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03- OAR-2017-0739 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gavin Huang, (215) 814-2042, or by email at huang.gavin@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On March 27, 2008, EPA strengthened the ozone standard from 0.08 to 0.075 parts per million (ppm). 73 FR 16436. On May 21, 2012, EPA designated areas as nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, which include the following counties in Pennsylvania: Carbon, Lehigh, Northampton, Lancaster, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Philadelphia, Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington, Westmoreland, and Berks counties. See 40 CFR 81.339. [[Page 10651]] Additionally, Pennsylvania is located in the ozone transport region (OTR) established by Congress in section 184 of the CAA. Pursuant to section 184(b)(2), any stationary source that emits or has the potential to emit at least 50 tons per year (tpy) of volatile organic compounds (VOC) shall be considered a major stationary source and subject to the requirements which would be applicable to major stationary sources if the area were classified as a moderate nonattainment area. See CAA section 184. Thus, states within the OTR are subject to plan (or SIP) requirements in CAA section 182(b) applicable to moderate nonattainment areas. Also, section 182(f)(1) of the CAA requires that the plan provisions required for major stationary sources of VOC also apply to major stationary sources of oxides of nitrogen (NOX ) for states with moderate (or worse) ozone nonattainment areas. A major stationary source of NOX is defined as a stationary facility or source of air pollutants which directly emits, or has the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of NOX . See CAA section 302(j). Section 182 of the CAA identifies additional plan submissions and requirements for ozone nonattainment areas. Specifically, section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA requires that states develop and submit rules which establish annual reporting requirements for certain stationary sources. Sources that are within marginal (or worse) ozone nonattainment areas must annually report the actual emissions of NOX and VOC to the state. However, states may waive reporting requirements for sources that emit under 25 tpy of NOX and VOC if the state provides an inventory of emissions from such class or category of sources. See CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii). In summary, because Pennsylvania is located in the OTR, Pennsylvania sources that are located in ozone attainment areas and emit above 50 tpy of VOC or 100 tpy of NOX are considered major sources and subject to the requirements of major stationary sources in moderate (or worse) nonattainment area, such as an emissions statement submission required by CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). See CAA sections 182(f) and 184(b)(2). Pennsylvania sources that are located in designated marginal (or worse) nonattainment areas must also submit an emissions statement as required by CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). As stated previously, states may waive reporting requirements for sources that emit under the 25 tpy NOX and VOC threshold if the state provides an inventory of emissions from such class or category of sources as required by CAA sections 172 and 182.\1\ See section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For further information on the emissions statement reporting requirements, see ``Guidance on the Implementation of an Emission Statement Program (July 1992)'' https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/emission_statement_program_zypdf.pdf, pp. 5-9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On November 3, 2017, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) submitted a SIP revision to satisfy the emissions statement requirement of section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. In the submittal, PADEP also submitted a certification for its nonattainment new source review (NNSR) program, which will be addressed in a separate rulemaking action. II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis On January 12, 1995 (60 FR 2881), EPA approved Pennsylvania's SIP submittal which included Pennsylvania regulations that satisfy the emission reporting requirements in CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). Pennsylvania's emissions reporting requirements are codified in the Pennsylvania Code at 25 Pa. Code 135.21 ``Emissions Statements.'' 25 Pa. Code 135.21 requires that stationary sources or facilities that emit NOX or VOC and are located in an area designated by the CAA as a marginal, moderate, serious, severe or extreme ozone nonattainment area or stationary sources or facilities that are located in the OTR (and not in an area designated as a marginal or worse nonattainment area) and emit or have the potential to emit 100 tons or more of NOX or 50 tons or more of VOC per year, submit an annual emissions statement. Because Pennsylvania is located in the OTR, sources that are located in attainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and emit above 50 tpy of VOC and 100 tpy of NOX are considered major sources and subject to the requirements of major stationary sources in moderate (or worse) nonattainment area, such as an emissions statement submission as required by CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). See CAA sections 182(f) and 184(b)(2). This statement must show, in a form as PADEP may prescribe, for classes or categories of sources: The actual emissions of NOX or VOC from that source for each reporting period, a description of the method used to calculate the emissions, and the time period over which the calculation is based. The statement must be submitted by a company officer or plant manager who can verify the source's actual emissions. Under 25 Pa. Code 135.21(d), sources that emit less than 25 tons of NOX or VOC per year are not required to submit the mandatory emissions statement per 25 Pa. Code 135.21(a) if PADEP provides EPA with an inventory of emissions from the class or category of sources based on the use of the emission factors established by the Administrator. As previously mentioned, per CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii), states may waive reporting requirements for sources under 25 tpy of NOX and VOC if the state provides an inventory of emissions from such class or category of sources as required by CAA sections 172 and 182. In the November 3, 2017 SIP submittal, Pennsylvania states that, upon review, the Commonwealth certifies that the existing emissions statement program continues to comply with the 2008 ozone NAAQS requirements. See 60 FR 2881 (January 12, 1995). EPA finds that 25 Pa. Code 135.21 continues to satisfy section 182(a)(3)(B) because the existing rule is applicable to the entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and requires stationary sources that emit NOX or VOC (at required thresholds above 25 tpy in designated ozone nonattainment areas and above 50 tpy VOC or 100 tpy NOX in ozone attainment areas in the OTR) to submit an emissions statement to the Commonwealth detailing the sources' emissions. As previously mentioned, per CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii), states may waive sources that emit less than 25 tpy of NOX or VOC if the state provides an inventory of emissions from such class or category of sources as required by CAA section 172 and 182. Pennsylvania does provide emissions inventories for ozone nonattainment areas as required by CAA section 172(c)(3).\2\ EPA finds Pennsylvania's emissions' thresholds for sources that are required to submit an emissions statement meet CAA requirements in sections 182 (plan submissions and requirements for ozone nonattainment areas) and 184 (OTR requirements). See also ``Guidance on the Implementation of an Emission Statement Program (July 1992).'' Therefore, EPA has determined that 25 Pa. Code 135.21, which is currently in the Pennsylvania SIP, is appropriate to address the emissions [[Page 10652]] statement requirement in section 182(a)(3)(B) and is proposing to approve this SIP revision. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See ``Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; 2011 Base Year Inventories for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Lancaster, Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, and Reading Areas, and the Pennsylvania Portion of the Philadelphia- Wilmington-Atlantic City Area,'' 81 FR 24492 (April 26, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve the November 3, 2017 Pennsylvania SIP revision certifying that Pennsylvania's existing SIP-approved emissions statement regulation meets the emissions statement requirement of section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule, which proposes to approve Pennsylvania's certification that Pennsylvania's SIP-approved emissions statement regulation meets the emissions statement requirement of section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: February 23, 2018. Cosmo Servidio, Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2018-04813 Filed 3-9-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![10650 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 48 / Monday, March 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
F. Environment provided. For more about privacy and SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
We have analyzed this proposed rule the docket, visit http:// Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
under Department of Homeland www.regulations.gov/privacynotice. state implementation plan (SIP) revision
Security Management Directive 023–01 Documents mentioned in this NPRM submitted by the Commonwealth of
and Commandant Instruction as being available in this docket and all Pennsylvania. This revision fulfills
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast public comments, will be in our online Pennsylvania’s emissions statement
Guard in complying with the National docket at http://www.regulations.gov requirement for the 2008 ozone national
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and can be viewed by following that ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and website’s instructions. Additionally, if This action is being taken under the
have made a preliminary determination you go to the online docket and sign up Clean Air Act (CAA).
that this action is one of a category of for email alerts, you will be notified DATES: Written comments must be
actions which do not individually or when comments are posted or a final received on or before April 11, 2018.
cumulatively have a significant effect on rule is published.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
the human environment. This proposed List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
rule simply promulgates the operating OAR–2017–0739 at http://
Bridges.
regulations or procedures for www.regulations.gov, or via email to
drawbridges. Normally such actions are For the reasons discussed in the spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
categorically excluded from further preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
review, under figure 2–1, paragraph (32) amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: follow the online instructions for
(e), of the Instruction. submitting comments. Once submitted,
A preliminary Record of PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
comments cannot be edited or removed
Environmental Consideration and a OPERATION REGULATIONS
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
Memorandum for the Record are not of submission, EPA may publish any
■ 1. The authority citation for part 117
required for this proposed rule. We seek comment received to its public docket.
continues to read as follows:
any comments or information that may Do not submit electronically any
lead to the discovery of a significant Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; information you consider to be
environmental impact from this Department of Homeland Security Delegation confidential business information (CBI)
proposed rule. No. 0170.1. or other information whose disclosure is
G. Protest Activities ■ 2. Add § 117.1029 to read as follows: restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
The Coast Guard respects the First § 117.1029 Chambers Bay. accompanied by a written comment.
Amendment rights of protesters. The draw of the Chambers Bay The written comment is considered the
Protesters are asked to contact the railroad lift bridge, mile 0.01, at official comment and should include
person listed in the FOR FURTHER Chambers Bay, shall open on signal discussion of all points you wish to
INFORMATION CONTACT section to except between 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. The make. EPA will generally not consider
coordinate protest activities so that your draw shall open on signal from 10 p.m. comments or comment contents located
message can be received without to 6 a.m. when at least four hours of outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
jeopardizing the safety or security of notice has been given via the phone on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
people, places or vessels. number posted on the bridge, and as system). For additional submission
V. Public Participation and Request for soon as possible, no later than 1 hour methods, please contact the person
Comments after notification, for vessels engaged in identified in the FOR FURTHER
emergency response. INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
We view public participation as full EPA public comment policy,
essential to effective rulemaking, and Dated: February 16, 2018.
Brendan C. McPherson,
information about CBI or multimedia
will consider all comments and material submissions, and general guidance on
received during the comment period. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
making effective comments, please visit
Your comment can help shape the http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
outcome of this rulemaking. If you [FR Doc. 2018–04912 Filed 3–9–18; 8:45 am]
commenting-epa-dockets.
submit a comment, please include the BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
docket number for this rulemaking, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
indicate the specific section of this Gavin Huang, (215) 814–2042, or by
document to which each comment email at huang.gavin@epa.gov.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
applies, and provide a reason for each AGENCY SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
suggestion or recommendation.
I. Background
We encourage you to submit 40 CFR Part 52
comments through the Federal On March 27, 2008, EPA strengthened
eRulemaking Portal at http:// [EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0739; FRL–9975–34– the ozone standard from 0.08 to 0.075
www.regulations.gov. If your material Region 3] parts per million (ppm). 73 FR 16436.
cannot be submitted using http:// On May 21, 2012, EPA designated areas
www.regulations.gov, contact the person Approval and Promulgation of Air as nonattainment for the 2008 ozone
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Quality Implementation Plans; NAAQS, which include the following
CONTACT section of this document for Pennsylvania; Emissions Statement counties in Pennsylvania: Carbon,
alternate instructions. Requirement for the 2008 Ozone Lehigh, Northampton, Lancaster, Bucks,
We accept anonymous comments. All Standard Chester, Delaware, Montgomery,
comments received will be posted AGENCY: Environmental Protection Philadelphia, Allegheny, Armstrong,
without change to http:// Agency (EPA). Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington,
www.regulations.gov and will include Westmoreland, and Berks counties. See
ACTION: Proposed rule.
any personal information you have 40 CFR 81.339.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Mar 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12MRP1.SGM 12MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_10698/page/1.svg)
![10652 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 48 / Monday, March 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
statement requirement in section • is not subject to requirements of ozone nonattainment areas classified as
182(a)(3)(B) and is proposing to approve Section 12(d) of the National marginal or above to report annual
this SIP revision. EPA is soliciting Technology Transfer and Advancement emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and
public comments on the issues Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because volatile organic compounds (VOC). This
discussed in this document. These application of those requirements would emissions statement requirement also
comments will be considered before be inconsistent with the CAA; and applies to stationary sources located in
taking final action. • does not provide EPA with the the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) that
discretionary authority to address, as emit or have the potential to emit at
III. Proposed Action least 50 tons per year (tpy) of VOC or
appropriate, disproportionate human
EPA is proposing to approve the health or environmental effects, using 100 tpy of NOX. The SIP revision
November 3, 2017 Pennsylvania SIP practicable and legally permissible provides Virginia’s certification that its
revision certifying that Pennsylvania’s methods, under Executive Order 12898 existing emissions statement program
existing SIP-approved emissions (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). satisfies the emissions statement
statement regulation meets the In addition, this proposed rule, which requirements of the CAA for the 2008
emissions statement requirement of proposes to approve Pennsylvania’s ozone National Ambient Air Quality
section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA for the certification that Pennsylvania’s SIP- Standards (NAAQS). EPA is proposing
2008 ozone NAAQS. approved emissions statement to approve Virginia’s emissions
IV. Statutory and Executive Order regulation meets the emissions statement program certification for the
Reviews statement requirement of section 2008 ozone NAAQS as a SIP revision in
182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, does not have accordance with the requirements of the
Under the CAA, the Administrator is tribal implications as specified by CAA.
required to approve a SIP submission Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, DATES: Written comments must be
that complies with the provisions of the November 9, 2000), because the SIP is received on or before April 11, 2018.
CAA and applicable federal regulations. not approved to apply in Indian country ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). located in the state, and EPA notes that identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, it will not impose substantial direct OAR–2017–0738 at http://
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, costs on tribal governments or preempt www.regulations.gov, or via email to
provided that they meet the criteria of tribal law. spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
merely approves state law as meeting
follow the online instructions for
federal requirements and does not Environmental protection, Air submitting comments. Once submitted,
impose additional requirements beyond pollution control, Incorporation by comments cannot be edited or removed
those imposed by state law. For that reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, from Regulations.gov. For either manner
reason, this proposed action: Reporting and recordkeeping of submission, EPA may publish any
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory requirements, Volatile organic comment received to its public docket.
action’’ subject to review by the Office compounds. Do not submit electronically any
of Management and Budget under
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. information you consider to be
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
Dated: February 23, 2018. confidential business information (CBI)
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
or other information whose disclosure is
January 21, 2011); Cosmo Servidio,
• is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 restricted by statute. Multimedia
Regional Administrator, Region III.
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
[FR Doc. 2018–04813 Filed 3–9–18; 8:45 am]
action because SIP approvals are accompanied by a written comment.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P The written comment is considered the
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• does not impose an information official comment and should include
collection burden under the provisions discussion of all points you wish to
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION make. EPA will generally not consider
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 AGENCY
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); comments or comment contents located
• is certified as not having a 40 CFR Part 52 outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
significant economic impact on a on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0738; FRL–9975–35– system). For additional submission
substantial number of small entities Region 3]
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 methods, please contact the person
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); identified in the FOR FURTHER
Approval and Promulgation of Air
• does not contain any unfunded Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
mandate or significantly or uniquely full EPA public comment policy,
Emissions Statement Rule Certification
affect small governments, as described information about CBI or multimedia
for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act submissions, and general guidance on
Air Quality Standard
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); making effective comments, please visit
• does not have federalism AGENCY: Environmental Protection http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
implications as specified in Executive Agency (EPA). commenting-epa-dockets.
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, ACTION: Proposed rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
1999); Calcinore, (215) 814–2043, or by email
• is not an economically significant SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection at calcinore.sara@epa.gov.
regulatory action based on health or Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
safety risks subject to Executive Order state implementation plan (SIP) revision
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); formally submitted by the I. Background
• is not a significant regulatory action Commonwealth of Virginia (Virginia). Under the CAA, EPA establishes
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), states’ NAAQS for criteria pollutants in order
28355, May 22, 2001); SIPs must require stationary sources in to protect human health and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Mar 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12MRP1.SGM 12MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_10698/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:51:46
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:51:46
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before April 11, 2018. | |
| Contact | Gavin Huang, (215) 814-2042, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 10650 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR