83 FR 10786 - Safety Zone; Tennessee River, Huntsville, AL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 49 (March 13, 2018)

Page Range		10786-10788
FR Document		2018-04968

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all navigable waters of the Tennessee River from mile marker (MM) 322.0 to MM 325.0. The safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of life and vessels during cargo transfer operations taking place at Redstone Arsenal. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10786-10788]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0006]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Tennessee River, Huntsville, AL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
all navigable waters of the Tennessee River from mile marker (MM) 322.0 
to MM 325.0. The safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of 
life and vessels during cargo transfer operations taking place at 
Redstone Arsenal. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is 
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from March 13, 2018 
through March 16, 2018, or until the cargo operation ceases, whichever 
comes first. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be 
used from March 5, 2018 through March 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0006 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Petty Officer Vera Max, MSD Nashville, U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone 615-736-5421, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

BNM Broadcast Notice to Mariners
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley
DHS Department of Homeland Security
LNM Local Notice to Mariners
FR Federal Register
MM Mile marker
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. We must 
establish this safety zone by March 5, 2018 and lack sufficient time to 
provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those comments 
before issuing the rule.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of 
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest 
because the event will take place before the 30 days and this rule is 
necessary to provide for public safety against the potential hazards 
associated with this cargo transfer operation.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) has determined 
that potential hazards associated with a cargo transfer operation 
taking place at Redstone Arsenal during the period from March 5, 2018 
through March 16, 2018 will be a safety concern for all navigable 
waters of the Tennessee River between mile markers (MMs) 322.0 and 
325.0. The purpose of this rule is to ensure safety of life on the 
navigable waters in the temporary safety zone before, during, and after 
the cargo transfer operations.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary safety zone from March 5, 2018 
through March 16, 2018, or until the cargo operation is completed, 
whichever comes first. The temporary safety zone will cover all 
navigable waters of the Tennessee River between MMs 322.0 and 325.0. 
Transit into and through this area is prohibited during periods of 
enforcement. The periods of enforcement will be prior to, during, and 
30 minutes after any vessel movement and cargo transfer operations at 
Redstone Arsenal. The Coast Guard was informed that the operations will 
take place during daylight hours over approximately two days. Safety 
zone enforcement times will be announced via Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners (BNM), Local Notices to Mariners (LNM), or through other means 
of public notice and at least 1 hour notice will be provided before 
each enforcement period.
    The duration of the temporary safety zone is intended to ensure the 
safety of life and vessels on these navigable waters before, during, 
and after the cargo transfer operations taking place at Redstone 
Arsenal. All vessels intending to transit the Tennessee River between 
MMs 322.0 and 325.0 from March 5, 2018 through March 16, 2018 must 
contact the COTP or a designated representative to request permission 
to transit at a time when critical operations

[[Page 10787]]

are not taking place. Entry into this safety zone is prohibited unless 
specifically authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. 
Entry requests will be considered and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. 
The COTP may be contacted by telephone at 1-800-253-7465 or can be 
reached by VHF-FM channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-year of the temporary safety zone. This 
safety zone prohibits transit on a three mile stretch of the Tennessee 
River only during critical cargo transfer operations at Redstone 
Arsenal over approximately two days, during a time of year that 
experiences lower than normal traffic. Broadcast Notices to Mariners 
and Local Notices to Mariners will also inform the community of the 
safety zone enforcement periods through BNM, LNM, and other means of 
public notice so that they may plan accordingly for each enforcement 
period restricting transit. Vessel traffic must request permission from 
the COTP or a designated representative to enter the restricted area.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a safety zone that would prohibit entry to vessels during 
cargo transfer operations at Redstone Arsenal. It is categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, 
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of 
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available 
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
Recordkeeping Requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.


[[Page 10788]]


    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0006 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T08-0006   Safety zone; Tennessee River, Huntsville, AL.

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone area: 
all navigable waters of the Tennessee River between Mile Marker (MM) 
322.0 and MM 325.0, Huntsville, AL.
    (b) Effective date. This section is effective from March 5, 2018 
through March 16, 2018 or until the cargo operation is completed, 
whichever comes first.
    (c) Periods of enforcement. This section will be enforced prior to 
and 30 minutes after all vessel movement and cargo transfer operations 
taking place at Redstone Arsenal. The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio 
Valley (COTP) or a designated representative will inform the public 
through Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM), Local Notices to Mariners 
(LNM), or through other means of public notice at least 1 hour in 
advance of each enforcement period.
    (d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless 
specifically authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. 
Persons or vessels desiring to enter into or pass through the zone must 
request permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They 
may be contacted by telephone at 1-800-253-7465 or on VHF-FM radio 
channel 16.
    (2) Persons and vessels permitted to enter this safety zone must 
transit at the slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions 
issued by the COTP or a designated representative.
    (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated 
representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to 
mariners of the enforcement period for the temporary safety zone as 
well as any changes in the planned schedule.

    Dated: March 5, 2018.
M.B. Zamperini,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2018-04968 Filed 3-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 10787

are not taking place. Entry into this with populations of less than 50,000. direct effect on one or more Indian
safety zone is prohibited unless The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. tribes, on the relationship between the
specifically authorized by the COTP or 605(b) that this rule will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes,
a designated representative. Entry significant economic impact on a or on the distribution of power and
requests will be considered and substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal
reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you
COTP may be contacted by telephone at vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for
1–800–253–7465 or can be reached by zone may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please
VHF–FM channel 16. reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR
rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
V. Regulatory Analyses economic impact on any vessel owner above.
We developed this rule after or operator.
considering numerous statutes and Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Below we summarize our analyses Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
based on a number of these statutes and we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of
Executive Orders, and we discuss First understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
Amendment rights of protestors. would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions
A. Regulatory Planning and Review organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
direct agencies to assess the costs and compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
benefits of available regulatory listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
alternatives and, if regulation is CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure,
necessary, to select regulatory Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
approaches that maximize net benefits. on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies who enforce, or otherwise determine
to control regulatory costs through a compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
budgeting process. This rule has not the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
been designated a ‘‘significant Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
regulatory action,’’ under Executive and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
not been reviewed by the Office of Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in
Management and Budget (OMB), and annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
from the requirements of Executive wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
Order 13771. employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a
This regulatory action determination 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not
is based on the size, location, duration, Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a
and time-of-year of the temporary safety small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human
zone. This safety zone prohibits transit about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves a safety
on a three mile stretch of the Tennessee of the Coast Guard. zone that would prohibit entry to
River only during critical cargo transfer vessels during cargo transfer operations
operations at Redstone Arsenal over C. Collection of Information at Redstone Arsenal. It is categorically
approximately two days, during a time This rule will not call for a new excluded from further review under
of year that experiences lower than collection of information under the paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
normal traffic. Broadcast Notices to Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
Mariners and Local Notices to Mariners U.S.C. 3501–3520). 001–01, Rev. 01. A Record of
will also inform the community of the Environmental Consideration
safety zone enforcement periods D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments supporting this determination is
through BNM, LNM, and other means of available in the docket where indicated
public notice so that they may plan A rule has implications for federalism under ADDRESSES.
accordingly for each enforcement period under Executive Order 13132,
restricting transit. Vessel traffic must Federalism, if it has a substantial direct G. Protest Activities
request permission from the COTP or a effect on the States, on the relationship The Coast Guard respects the First
designated representative to enter the between the national government and Amendment rights of protesters.
restricted area. the States, or on the distribution of Protesters are asked to contact the
power and responsibilities among the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
B. Impact on Small Entities various levels of government. We have INFORMATION CONTACT section to
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of analyzed this rule under that Order and coordinate protest activities so that your
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, have determined that it is consistent message can be received without
requires Federal agencies to consider with the fundamental federalism jeopardizing the safety or security of
the potential impact of regulations on principles and preemption requirements people, places or vessels.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES

small entities during rulemaking. The described in Executive Order 13132.
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Also, this rule does not have tribal List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
businesses, not-for-profit organizations implications under Executive Order Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
that are independently owned and 13175, Consultation and Coordination (water), Reporting and Recordkeeping
operated and are not dominant in their with Indian Tribal Governments, Requirements, Security Measures,
fields, and governmental jurisdictions because it does not have a substantial Waterways.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Mar 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM 13MRR1

10788 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

For the reasons discussed in the Dated: March 5, 2018. available through http://
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 M.B. Zamperini, www.regulations.gov, or please contact
CFR part 165 as follows: Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
Port Sector Ohio Valley. INFORMATION CONTACT section for
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION [FR Doc. 2018–04968 Filed 3–12–18; 8:45 am] additional availability information.
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS BILLING CODE 9110–04–P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Calcinore, (215) 814–2043, or by email
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 at calcinore.sara@epa.gov.
continues to read as follows: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; AGENCY
I. Background
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation 40 CFR Part 52 VOCs are organic compounds of
No. 0170.1 [EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0544; FRL–9975–37– carbon that, in the presence of sunlight,
Region 3] react with sources of oxygen molecules,
■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0006 to read as such as nitrogen oxides (NOX) and
follows: Approval and Promulgation of Air carbon monoxide (CO), in the
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; atmosphere to produce tropospheric
§ 165.T08–0006 Safety zone; Tennessee Revisions to the Regulatory Definition ozone, commonly known as smog.
River, Huntsville, AL. Common sources that may emit VOCs
of Volatile Organic Compound
(a) Location. The following area is a include paints, coatings, housekeeping
AGENCY: Environmental Protection and maintenance products, and building
temporary safety zone area: all navigable
Agency (EPA). and furnishing materials. Outdoor
waters of the Tennessee River between
ACTION: Final rule. emissions of VOCs are regulated by EPA
Mile Marker (MM) 322.0 and MM 325.0,
Huntsville, AL. primarily to prevent the formation of
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
ozone.
(b) Effective date. This section is Agency (EPA) is approving two state VOCs have different levels of
effective from March 5, 2018 through implementation plan (SIP) revisions volatility, depending on the compound,
March 16, 2018 or until the cargo (Revision C16 and Revision I16) and react at different rates to produce
operation is completed, whichever formally submitted by the varying amounts of ozone. VOCs that
comes first. Commonwealth of Virginia (Virginia). are non-reactive or of negligible
The revisions pertain to amendments reactivity to form ozone react slowly
(c) Periods of enforcement. This
made to the definition of ‘‘volatile and/or form less ozone; therefore,
section will be enforced prior to and 30
organic compound’’ (VOC) in the reducing their emissions has limited
minutes after all vessel movement and
Virginia Administrative Code to effects on local or regional ozone
cargo transfer operations taking place at conform with EPA’s regulatory
Redstone Arsenal. The Captain of the pollution. Section 302(s) of the CAA
definition of VOC. Specifically, these specifies that EPA has the authority to
Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or a amendments remove the record keeping define the meaning of VOC and what
designated representative will inform and reporting requirements for t-butyl
the public through Broadcast Notice to compounds shall be treated as VOCs for
acetate (also known as tertiary butyl regulatory purposes. It is EPA’s policy
Mariners (BNM), Local Notices to acetate or TBAC); Chemical Abstracts
Mariners (LNM), or through other means that organic compounds with a
Service [CAS] number: 540–88–5) and negligible level of reactivity should be
of public notice at least 1 hour in add 1,1,2,2,-Tetrafluoro-1-(2,2,2-
advance of each enforcement period. excluded from the regulatory definition
trifluoroethoxy) ethane (also known as of VOC in order to focus control efforts
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance HFE-347pcf2; CAS number: 406–78–0) on compounds that significantly affect
with the general regulations in § 165.23 as a compound excluded from the ozone concentrations. EPA uses the
of this part, entry into this zone is regulatory definition of VOC, which reactivity of ethane as the threshold for
prohibited unless specifically match actions EPA has taken. EPA is determining whether a compound is of
authorized by the COTP or a designated approving these revisions to update the negligible reactivity. Compounds that
representative. Persons or vessels definition of VOC in the Virginia SIP in are less or equally reactive as ethane
desiring to enter into or pass through accordance with the requirements of the under certain assumed conditions may
the zone must request permission from Clean Air Act (CAA). be deemed negligibly reactive and,
the COTP or a designated DATES: This final rule is effective on therefore, suitable for exemption by EPA
representative. They may be contacted April 12, 2018. from the regulatory definition of VOC.
by telephone at 1–800–253–7465 or on ADDRESSES: EPA has established a The policy of excluding negligibly
VHF–FM radio channel 16. docket for this action under Docket ID reactive compounds from the regulatory
(2) Persons and vessels permitted to Number EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0544. All definition of VOC was first laid out in
enter this safety zone must transit at the documents in the docket are listed on ‘‘Recommended Policy on Control of
slowest safe speed and comply with all the http://www.regulations.gov website. Volatile Organic Compounds’’ (42 FR
Although listed in the index, some 35314, July 8, 1977) and was
lawful directions issued by the COTP or
information is not publicly available, supplemented subsequently with the
a designated representative.
e.g., confidential business information ‘‘Interim Guidance on Control of
(d) Informational broadcasts. The (CBI) or other information whose Volatile Organic Compounds in Ozone
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES

COTP or a designated representative disclosure is restricted by statute. State Implementation Plans’’ (70 FR
will inform the public through Certain other material, such as 54046, September 13, 2005). The
broadcast notices to mariners of the copyrighted material, is not placed on regulatory definition of VOC as well as
enforcement period for the temporary the internet and will be publicly a list of compounds that are designated
safety zone as well as any changes in the available only in hard copy form. by EPA as negligibly reactive can be
planned schedule. Publicly available docket materials are found at 40 CFR 51.100(s).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Mar 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM 13MRR1

Document Created: 2018-03-13 01:56:55
Document Modified: 2018-03-13 01:56:55

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from March 13, 2018 through March 16, 2018, or until the cargo operation ceases, whichever comes first. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from March 5, 2018 through March 13, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Vera Max, MSD Nashville, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 615-736-5421, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 10786
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 10786 - Safety Zone; Tennessee River, Huntsville, AL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 49 (March 13, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard