83 FR 10814 - Air Plan Approval and Air Quality Designation; SC; Redesignation of the Greenville-Spartanburg Unclassifiable Area
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 49 (March 13, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 49 (March 13, 2018)
| Page Range | 10814-10816 | |
| FR Document | 2018-05060 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 10814-10816] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-05060] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 81 [EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0017; FRL-9975-52-Region 4] Air Plan Approval and Air Quality Designation; SC; Redesignation of the Greenville-Spartanburg Unclassifiable Area AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. [[Page 10815]] ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On January 22, 2018, the State of South Carolina, through the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC), submitted a request for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to redesignate the Greenville-Spartanburg, South Carolina fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) unclassifiable area (hereinafter referred to as the ``Greenville Area'' or ``Area'') to unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The Greenville Area is comprised of Anderson, Greenville, and Spartanburg Counties in South Carolina. EPA now has sufficient data to determine that the Greenville Area is in attainment of the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve the State's request and redesignate the Area to unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS based upon valid, quality- assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing that the PM2.5 monitors in the Area are in compliance with the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 12, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04- OAR-2018-0017 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madolyn Sanchez, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Sanchez can be reached by telephone at (404) 562-9644 or via electronic mail at sanchez.madolyn@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) establishes a process for air quality management through the establishment and implementation of the NAAQS. After the promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required to designate areas, pursuant to section 107(d)(1) of the CAA, as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable. On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652), EPA revised the NAAQS for particulate matter to add new standards for PM2.5 (annual and 24-hour). The primary and secondary annual standards were each set at a level of 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\), based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations. The primary and secondary 24-hour standards were each set at a level of 65 [micro]g/m\3\, based on a 3- year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour concentrations. EPA established the standards based on significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with exposures to particulate matter. The process for designating areas following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS is contained in section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. EPA and state air quality agencies initiated the monitoring process for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in 1999, and deployed all air quality monitors by January 2001. On January 5, 2005 (70 FR 944), EPA designated areas across the country as nonattainment, unclassifiable, or unclassifiable/attainment \1\ for the PM2.5 NAAQS based upon air quality monitoring data from these monitors for calendar years 2001-2003. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For the initial PM area designations in 2005 (for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS), EPA used a designation category of ``unclassifiable/attainment'' for areas that had monitors showing attainment of the standard and were not contributing to nearby violations and for areas that did not have monitors but for which EPA had reason to believe were likely attaining the standard and not contributing to nearby violations. EPA used the category ``unclassifiable'' for areas in which EPA could not determine, based upon available information, whether or not the NAAQS was being met and/or EPA had not determined the area to be contributing to nearby violations. EPA reserves the ``attainment'' category for when EPA redesignates a nonattainment area that has attained the relevant NAAQS and has an approved maintenance plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Greenville County, South Carolina, had a monitor with less than three years of data since the monitor had not been in operation for the full 2001-2003 period. Based upon the data that was obtained during its operation, the monitor indicated a potential to violate the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Also, Anderson and Spartanburg Counties had emissions and population levels that potentially contributed to the elevated concentrations of PM2.5 at the Greenville monitor in question. Therefore, EPA designated all three counties--Anderson, Greenville and Spartanburg--as unclassifiable for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. II. What are the criteria for redesignating an area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment? Section 107(d)(3) of the CAA provides the framework for changing the area designations for any NAAQS pollutants. Section 107(d)(3)(A) provides that the Administrator may notify the Governor of any state that the designation of an area should be revised ``on the basis of air quality data, planning and control considerations, or any other air quality-related considerations the Administrator deems appropriate.'' The Act further provides in section 107(d)(3)(D) that even if the Administrator has not notified a state Governor that a designation should be revised, the Governor of any state may, on the Governor's own motion, submit a request to revise the designation of any area, and the Administrator must approve or deny the request. When approving or denying a request to redesignate an area, EPA bases its decision on the air quality data for the area as well as the considerations provided under section 107(d)(3)(A).\2\ In keeping with section 107(d)(1)(A), areas that are redesignated to unclassifiable/ attainment must meet the requirements for attainment areas and thus must meet the relevant NAAQS. In addition, the area must not contribute to ambient air quality in a nearby area that does not meet the NAAQS. The relevant monitoring data must be collected and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR part 58 and recorded in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS) database. The designated monitors generally should have remained at the same location for the duration of the monitoring period [[Page 10816]] upon which the redesignation request is based.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ While CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) also list specific requirements for redesignations, those requirements only apply to redesignations of nonattainment areas to attainment and therefore are not applicable in the context of a redesignation of an area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment. \3\ See Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, EPA Air Quality Management Division, entitled ``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment'' (September 4, 1992). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. What is EPA's rationale for proposing to redesignate the Area? In order to redesignate the Area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 3-year average of annual arithmetic mean concentrations (i.e., design value) over the most recent 3-year period must be less than or equal to 15.0 [micro]g/m\3\ at all monitoring sites in the Area over the full 3-year period, as determined in accordance with 40 CFR 50.18 and Appendix N of Part 50. EPA reviewed PM2.5 monitoring data from monitoring stations in the Greenville Area for the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the 3-year period from 2014-2016. These data have been quality-assured, certified, and recorded in AQS by South Carolina, and the monitoring locations have not changed during the monitoring period. As summarized in Table 1, the design values for the monitors in the Area for the 2014-2016 period are well below the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Table 1--1997 Annual PM2.5 Design Values for Monitors in the Greenville Area for 2014-2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2014-2016 Local site name Monitoring Design value site ([mu]g/m\3\) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greenville ESC.......................... 45-045-0015 9.3 Hillcrest Middle School................. 45-045-0016 8.6 T.K. Gregg.............................. 45-083-0011 8.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Because the 3-year design values, based on valid, quality-assured data, demonstrate that the Area meets the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 standards, EPA is proposing to redesignate the Greenville Area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment for this NAAQS. IV. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve South Carolina's January 22, 2018, request to redesignate the Greenville Area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. If finalized, approval of the redesignation request would change the legal designation, found at 40 CFR part 81, of Anderson, Greenville, and Spartanburg Counties from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to unclassifiable/ attainment is an action that affects the status of a geographical area and does not impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those imposed by state law. A redesignation to unclassifiable/ attainment does not in and of itself create any new requirements. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to redesignate an area to unclassifiable/attainment and does not impose additional requirements. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because redesignations are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Will not have disproportionate human health or environmental effects under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed action to redesignate the Greenville Area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 primary and secondary annual PM 2.5 NAAQS does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Catawba Indian Nation Reservation is located within the State of South Carolina. Pursuant to the Catawba Indian Claims Settlement Act, S.C. Code Ann. 27-16-120, ``all state and local environmental laws and regulations apply to the Catawba Indian Nation and Reservation and are fully enforceable by all relevant state and local agencies and authorities.'' However, because no tribal lands are located within the Area and the redesignation does not create new requirements, EPA has determined that this proposed rule does not have substantial direct effects on an Indian Tribe. EPA notes this proposed action will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 Environmental protection, Air pollution control. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. Dated: March 5, 2018. Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III, Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2018-05060 Filed 3-12-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![10814 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
revision also adds paragraph 4 which make a negligible contribution to • Does not contain any unfunded
states: ‘‘For purposes of enforcement for troposphere ozone formation. mandate or significantly or uniquely
a specific source, the test methods affect small governments, as described
III. Incorporation by Reference
specified in these regulations, in the in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
approved SIP, or in a permit issued In this rule, EPA is proposing to of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
pursuant to these regulations shall be include in a final EPA rule regulatory • Does not have Federalism
used to be consistent with state text that includes incorporation by implications as specified in Executive
regulations.’’ EPA is proposing to reference. In accordance with Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
approve these revisions because they are requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is 1999);
consistent with the definition of VOC at proposing to incorporate by reference • Is not an economically significant
40 CFR 51.100(s) and with other similar Chapter 4 of Part II, Section 4–2, regulatory action based on health or
SIP-approved regulations. ‘‘Definitions’’ effective August 16, 1995, safety risks subject to Executive Order
Finally, the SIP revision adds which revised the definition of VOC. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
paragraph 5 which states: ‘‘The EPA has made, and will continue to • Is not a significant regulatory action
following compound(s) are VOC for make, these materials generally subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
purposes of all recordkeeping, available through www.regulations.gov 28355, May 22, 2001);
emissions reporting, photochemical and at the EPA Region 4 Office (please • Is not subject to requirements of
dispersion modeling and inventory contact the person identified in the ‘‘For section 12(d) of the National
requirements which apply to VOC and Further Information Contact’’ section of Technology Transfer and Advancement
shall be uniquely identified in emission this preamble for more information). Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
reports, but are not VOC for purposes of application of those requirements would
IV. Proposed Action be inconsistent with the CAA; and
VOC emissions limitations or VOC
Pursuant to section 110 of the CAA, • Does not provide EPA with the
content requirements: t-butyl acetate.’’
EPA is proposing to approve the discretionary authority to address, as
Through this revision, Hamilton County
aforementioned changes to Tennessee’s appropriate, disproportionate human
is also adding t-butyl acetate to the list
SIP for Chapter 4 of Part II, Section 4– health or environmental effects, using
of negligibly reactive compounds, but
2. EPA has evaluated the relevant practicable and legally permissible
maintaining the requirements of
portions of Tennessee’s June 25, 2008, methods, under Executive Order 12898
recordkeeping, emissions reporting, and
SIP revision and has determined that it (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
inventory. EPA is proposing to approve The SIP is not approved to apply on
this revision because it is consistent meets the applicable requirements of the
CAA and EPA regulations and is any Indian reservation land or in any
with the definition of VOC at 40 CFR other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
51.100(s).3 4 consistent with EPA policy.
has demonstrated that a tribe has
Pursuant to CAA section 110(l), the V. Statutory and Executive Order jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
Administrator shall not approve a Reviews country, the rule does not have tribal
revision of a plan if the revision would implications as specified by Executive
interfere with any applicable Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
requirement concerning attainment and 2000), nor will it impose substantial
reasonable further progress (as defined that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations. direct costs on tribal governments or
in CAA section 171), or any other preempt tribal law.
applicable requirement of the Act. The See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
State’s addition of the County’s Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
exemptions from the definition of VOC, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, Environmental protection, Air
addition of recordkeeping, emissions provided that they meet the criteria of pollution control, Incorporation by
reporting, photochemical dispersion the CAA. This action merely proposes to reference, Intergovernmental relations,
modeling, and inventory requirements approve state law as meeting Federal Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
for t-butyl acetate, and other changes in requirements and does not impose requirements, Volatile organic
paragraphs 3 and 4 to Chapter 4 of Part additional requirements beyond those compounds.
II, Section 4–2, of the Chattanooga Code imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action: Dated: February 20, 2018.
‘‘Definitions’’ are approvable under
section 110(l) because they reflect • Is not a significant regulatory action Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
subject to review by the Office of Regional Administrator, Region 4.
changes to federal regulations based on
findings that the aforementioned Management and Budget under [FR Doc. 2018–04932 Filed 3–12–18; 8:45 am]
compounds are negligibly reactive and Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
3 In EPA’s November 29, 2004, final rulemaking, January 21, 2011);
the Agency added tertiary butyl acetate to the list • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
of excluded compounds from the definition of FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory AGENCY
VOCs. See 69 FR 69298.
action because SIP approvals are
4 While EPA added t-butyl acetate to the list of 40 CFR Part 81
negligibly reactive compounds in the November 29, exempted under Executive Order 12866.
2004, final rulemaking, t-butyl acetate continued to • Does not impose an information [EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0017; FRL–9975–52-
Region 4]
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
be a VOC for purposes of all recordkeeping, collection burden under the provisions
emissions reporting, and inventory requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
which applied to VOC. See 69 FR 69298.
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Air Plan Approval and Air Quality
Subsequently, on February 25, 2016 (81 FR 9339), Designation; SC; Redesignation of the
EPA issued a final rule removing recordkeeping, • Is certified as not having a
emissions reporting, and inventory requirements for Greenville-Spartanburg Unclassifiable
significant economic impact on a
t-Butyl acetate. Although EPA no longer requires Area
recordkeeping, emissions reporting, and inventory
substantial number of small entities
requirements for t-butyl acetate, this SIP revision under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 AGENCY: Environmental Protection
includes this requirement. U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Agency.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Mar 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13MRP1.SGM 13MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_10863/page/1.svg)
![10816 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
upon which the redesignation request is the most recent 3-year period must be 2014–2016. These data have been
based.3 less than or equal to 15.0 mg/m3 at all quality-assured, certified, and recorded
III. What is EPA’s rationale for monitoring sites in the Area over the in AQS by South Carolina, and the
proposing to redesignate the Area? full 3-year period, as determined in monitoring locations have not changed
accordance with 40 CFR 50.18 and during the monitoring period. As
In order to redesignate the Area from Appendix N of Part 50. EPA reviewed summarized in Table 1, the design
unclassifiable to unclassifiable/ PM2.5 monitoring data from monitoring values for the monitors in the Area for
attainment for the 1997 primary and stations in the Greenville Area for the the 2014–2016 period are well below
secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 3- 1997 primary and secondary annual the 1997 primary and secondary annual
year average of annual arithmetic mean
PM2.5 NAAQS for the 3-year period from PM2.5 NAAQS.
concentrations (i.e., design value) over
TABLE 1—1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 DESIGN VALUES FOR MONITORS IN THE GREENVILLE AREA FOR 2014–2016
2014–2016
Local site name Monitoring site Design value
(μg/m3)
Greenville ESC ........................................................................................................................................................ 45–045–0015 9.3
Hillcrest Middle School ............................................................................................................................................ 45–045–0016 8.6
T.K. Gregg ............................................................................................................................................................... 45–083–0011 8.7
Because the 3-year design values, • Is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR
based on valid, quality-assured data, subject to review by the Office of 7629, February 16, 1994).
demonstrate that the Area meets the Management and Budget under In addition, this proposed action to
1997 primary and secondary annual Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
redesignate the Greenville Area from
PM2.5 standards, EPA is proposing to October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
unclassifiable to unclassifiable/
redesignate the Greenville Area from January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 attainment for the 1997 primary and
unclassifiable to unclassifiable/
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS does
attainment for this NAAQS.
action because redesignations are not have Tribal implications as
IV. Proposed Action exempted under Executive Order 12866; specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
• Does not impose an information FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The
EPA is proposing to approve South Catawba Indian Nation Reservation is
collection burden under the provisions
Carolina’s January 22, 2018, request to located within the State of South
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
redesignate the Greenville Area from Carolina. Pursuant to the Catawba
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
unclassifiable to unclassifiable/
• Is certified as not having a Indian Claims Settlement Act, S.C. Code
attainment for the 1997 primary and Ann. 27–16–120, ‘‘all state and local
significant economic impact on a
secondary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. If
substantial number of small entities environmental laws and regulations
finalized, approval of the redesignation
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 apply to the Catawba Indian Nation and
request would change the legal U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Reservation and are fully enforceable by
designation, found at 40 CFR part 81, of • Does not contain any unfunded all relevant state and local agencies and
Anderson, Greenville, and Spartanburg mandate or significantly or uniquely
Counties from unclassifiable to authorities.’’ However, because no tribal
affect small governments, as described lands are located within the Area and
unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
primary and secondary annual PM2.5 the redesignation does not create new
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); requirements, EPA has determined that
NAAQS. • Does not have Federalism this proposed rule does not have
V. Statutory and Executive Order implications as specified in Executive substantial direct effects on an Indian
Reviews Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Tribe. EPA notes this proposed action
1999);
will not impose substantial direct costs
Under the CAA, redesignation of an • Is not an economically significant
on Tribal governments or preempt
area to unclassifiable/attainment is an regulatory action based on health or
action that affects the status of a Tribal law.
safety risks subject to Executive Order
geographical area and does not impose 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
any additional regulatory requirements • Is not a significant regulatory action
on sources beyond those imposed by subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Environmental protection, Air
state law. A redesignation to 28355, May 22, 2001); pollution control.
unclassifiable/attainment does not in • Is not subject to requirements of Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
and of itself create any new section 12(d) of the National
requirements. Accordingly, this Technology Transfer and Advancement Dated: March 5, 2018.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
proposed action merely proposes to Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
redesignate an area to unclassifiable/ application of those requirements would Regional Administrator, Region 4.
attainment and does not impose be inconsistent with the CAA; and [FR Doc. 2018–05060 Filed 3–12–18; 8:45 am]
additional requirements. For that • Will not have disproportionate BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
reason, this proposed action: human health or environmental effects
3 See Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, ‘‘Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate
EPA Air Quality Management Division, entitled Areas to Attainment’’ (September 4, 1992).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Mar 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13MRP1.SGM 13MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_10863/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-13 01:57:10
Document Modified: 2018-03-13 01:57:10
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before April 12, 2018. | |
| Contact | Madolyn Sanchez, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Sanchez can be reached by telephone at (404) 562-9644 or via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 10814 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection and Air Pollution Control |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR