83 FR 11887 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Removal of Source-Specific Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Facilities
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 53 (March 19, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 53 (March 19, 2018)
| Page Range | 11887-11889 | |
| FR Document | 2018-05404 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 53 (Monday, March 19, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 11887-11889] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-05404] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0555; FRL-9975-64-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Removal of Source-Specific Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Facilities AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West Virginia. This revision pertains to the removal of source-specific SIP requirements for the following five facilities in West Virginia that have permanently shutdown: Mountaineer Carbon Company; Standard Lafarge; Follansbee Steel Corporation; International Mill Service, Inc.; and Columbian Chemicals Company. These sources have permanently ceased operation; therefore, SIP requirements for these sources are obsolete and no longer necessary for attaining and maintaining the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). EPA is approving this revision in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on April 18, 2018. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0555. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section for additional availability information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The West Virginia SIP at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 52, subpart XX, section 52.2520(d) contains source-specific requirements, which were incorporated into the West Virginia SIP over the course of many years to allow the State to demonstrate attainment with various NAAQS. Subsequently, several of these sources have permanently ceased operation rendering source-specific requirements for these facilities obsolete. SIP revisions pertaining to the removal of obsolete SIP requirements for sources that have permanently shutdown are considered administrative, non-substantive changes. If a source has permanently shutdown, the emissions are permanently reduced to zero, so removing source-specific SIP requirements for that source will not interfere with attainment and maintenance of any NAAQS, reasonable further progress or any other applicable CAA requirement. See CAA section 110(l). II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis On August 25, 2017, West Virginia submitted a SIP revision requesting that the consent orders for the sources listed in Table 1 be removed from the West Virginia SIP located at 40 CFR part 52, subpart XX, section 52.2520(d). On December 5, 2017, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) proposing to approve West Virginia's August 25, 2017 (82 FR 57418) SIP revision. Table 1--Source-Specific Requirements Proposed for Removal From the West Virginia SIP ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State EPA approval date/Federal Register Source name Order effective date (FR) citation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mountaineer Carbon Company.......... Consent Order......... 7/2/82 9/1/82, 47 FR 38532. Standard Lafarge.................... Consent Order CO-SIP- 11/14/91 7/25/94, 59 FR 37696. 91-30. Follansbee Steel Corporation........ Consent Order CO-SIP- 11/14/91 7/25/94, 59 FR 37696. 91-31. International Mill Service, Inc..... Consent Order CO-SIP- 11/14/91 7/25/94, 59 FR 37696. 91-33. Columbian Chemicals Company......... Consent Order CO-SIP- 1/31/00 8/2/00, 65 FR 47339 2000-3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Public Comments and EPA's Responses EPA received six public comments on the NPR to approve West Virginia's SIP revision. Comment 1: The commenter expressed concern over whether the facilities' emissions would be regulated through monitoring and guidelines if they were to re-open. Response 1: CAA section 110(a)(2)(c) and Title I, Parts C and D, as well as CAA sections 172, 173, and 161 require states to implement permit programs consistent with the requirements of the CAA which regulate construction and modification of stationary sources to assure the NAAQS are achieved. These include nonattainment new source review (NSR) and prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permit programs. West Virginia has federally enforceable NSR and PSD permit programs incorporated in the West Virginia SIP. See 45CSR19 (NSR program approved 80 FR 29973(May 26, 2015)), 45CSR14 (PSD program approved 81 FR 53009 (August 11, 2016)), and 45CSR13 (minor source NSR program approved 79 FR 42213 (July 21, 2014)). All of the facilities listed in the NPR were permanently shut down, but if any were to re- open, or if any new sources were to start operating in West Virginia in the same location, they would need to comply with the requirements of West Virginia's permit programs, as applicable including NSR, PSD or minor NSR. Specifically, West Virginia's rule 45CSR14, ``Permits for the Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources of Air Pollution for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration,'' was approved into the West Virginia SIP in 1984 and subsequently revised several times with the latest revision to the SIP in 2015 (81 FR 53009). West Virginia's rule 45CSR13, ``Permits for Construction, Modification, or Relocation of Stationary Sources of Air Pollutants, and Procedures for Registration and Evaluation,'' requiring [[Page 11888]] construction or modification permits for all regulated stationary emission sources was approved into the West Virginia SIP in 1972 and last updated in 2014 (79 FR 42213). West Virginia's rule 45CSR19, ``Requirements for Pre-Construction Review, Determination of Emission Offsets for Proposed New or Modified Stationary Sources of Air Pollutants and Bubble Concept for Intra-Source Pollutants,'' for permitting of major sources and modifications in designated nonattainment areas was approved into the West Virginia SIP in 1985 (50 FR 27247) with recent revisions to the rule included in the SIP in 2015 (80 FR 29973). These federally enforceable rules approved into the West Virginia SIP ensure that pollutant-emitting sources are regulated with appropriate and required emission limitations and monitoring requirements as necessary, and that their operation will not prevent West Virginia from attaining or maintaining the NAAQS. Comment 2: The commenter expressed concern that wildfires are negatively impacting both public health and the environment, and that more should be done to prevent wildfires. Response 2: This comment is irrelevant to this rulemaking. This rulemaking is concerned with removing source-specific requirements from the SIP for permanently shut down facilities in West Virginia. As the comment is neither supportive of, critical of, nor specific to this action, no further response is provided. Comment 3: The commenter questioned why the United States is importing gas from Nigeria at Cove Point hurting the American middle class and the working poor. Response 3: This comment is irrelevant to this rulemaking. This rulemaking is concerned with removing source-specific requirements from the SIP for permanently shut down facilities in West Virginia. As the comment is neither supportive of, critical of, nor specific to this action, no further response is provided. Comment 4: The commenter expressed concern over unnecessary and burdensome regulations, and the regulatory process. Response 4: As the comment is neither supportive of, critical of, nor specific to this action, no response is provided. This rulemaking is concerned with removing source-specific requirements from the SIP for permanently shut down facilities in West Virginia. Comment 5: The commenter expresses concern over potentially harmful health effects from low frequency electro-magnetic fields and discusses how their use in automobiles amongst other things could be harmful to human health. Response 5: This comment is irrelevant to this rulemaking. This rulemaking is concerned with removing source-specific requirements from the SIP for permanently shut down facilities in West Virginia. As the comment is neither supportive of, critical of, nor specific to this action, no further response is provided. Comment 6: The commenter asserts that EPA relied on assumptions and false evidence to lead attacks on hydraulic fracturing, and utilized the film industry to create anti-fracking films, all to justify regulating the industry. Response 6: This comment is irrelevant to this rulemaking. This rulemaking is concerned with removing source-specific requirements from the SIP for permanently shut down facilities in West Virginia. As the comment is neither supportive of, critical of, nor specific to this action, no further response is provided. IV. Final Action EPA has reviewed West Virginia's SIP revision seeking removal of obsolete source-specific SIP requirements from the West Virginia SIP. These five sources have permanently ceased operation, rendering source- specific SIP requirements for these sources obsolete. EPA has confirmed that all permits have been surrendered and are inactive. Therefore, EPA is approving the West Virginia August 25, 2017 SIP revision, which sought removal of source-specific revisions related to five now closed facilities, in accordance with section 110 of the CAA. As the five sources permanently shutdown, their emissions are permanently eliminated, so removing the source-specific SIP requirements for these sources will not interfere with attainment and maintenance of any NAAQS, reasonable further progress or any other applicable CAA requirement in accordance with CAA section 110(l). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. General Requirements Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866. does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the [[Page 11889]] agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 804, however, exempts from section 801 the following types of rules: Rules of particular applicability; rules relating to agency management or personnel; and rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because this is a rule of particular applicability, EPA is not required to submit a rule report regarding this action under section 801. C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 18, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action pertaining to removal of source-specific requirements from the West Virginia SIP may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: March 6, 2018. Cosmo Servidio, Regional Administrator, Region III. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart XX--West Virginia Sec. 52.2520 [Amended] 0 2. In Sec. 52.2520, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by removing the entries for ``Mountaineer Carbon Co,'' ``Standard Lafarge,'' ``Follansbee Steel Corp,'' ``International Mill Service, Inc,'' and ``Columbian Chemicals Company.'' [FR Doc. 2018-05404 Filed 3-16-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 11887
[FR Doc. 2018–05317 Filed 3–16–18; 8:45 am] the national ambient air quality were incorporated into the West
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P standards (NAAQS). EPA is approving Virginia SIP over the course of many
this revision in accordance with the years to allow the State to demonstrate
requirements of the Clean Air Act attainment with various NAAQS.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (CAA). Subsequently, several of these sources
AGENCY DATES: This final rule is effective on have permanently ceased operation
April 18, 2018. rendering source-specific requirements
40 CFR Part 52 for these facilities obsolete.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0555; FRL–9975–64– docket for this action under Docket ID SIP revisions pertaining to the
Region 3] Number EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0555. All removal of obsolete SIP requirements for
documents in the docket are listed on sources that have permanently
Approval and Promulgation of Air shutdown are considered
the http://www.regulations.gov website.
Quality Implementation Plans; West administrative, non-substantive
Although listed in the index, some
Virginia; Removal of Source-Specific changes. If a source has permanently
information is not publicly available,
Requirements for Permanently shutdown, the emissions are
e.g., confidential business information
Shutdown Facilities permanently reduced to zero, so
(CBI) or other information whose
AGENCY: Environmental Protection disclosure is restricted by statute. removing source-specific SIP
Agency (EPA). Certain other material, such as requirements for that source will not
ACTION: Final rule. copyrighted material, is not placed on interfere with attainment and
the internet and will be publicly maintenance of any NAAQS, reasonable
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection available only in hard copy form. further progress or any other applicable
Agency (EPA) is approving a state Publicly available docket materials are CAA requirement. See CAA section
implementation plan (SIP) revision available through http:// 110(l).
submitted by the State of West Virginia. www.regulations.gov, or please contact II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
This revision pertains to the removal of the person identified in the ‘‘For Further Analysis
source-specific SIP requirements for the Information Contact’’ section for
following five facilities in West Virginia additional availability information. On August 25, 2017, West Virginia
that have permanently shutdown: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: submitted a SIP revision requesting that
Mountaineer Carbon Company; Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by the consent orders for the sources listed
Standard Lafarge; Follansbee Steel email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov. in Table 1 be removed from the West
Corporation; International Mill Service, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Virginia SIP located at 40 CFR part 52,
Inc.; and Columbian Chemicals subpart XX, section 52.2520(d). On
Company. These sources have I. Background December 5, 2017, EPA published a
permanently ceased operation; The West Virginia SIP at 40 Code of notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR)
therefore, SIP requirements for these Federal Regulations (CFR) part 52, proposing to approve West Virginia’s
sources are obsolete and no longer subpart XX, section 52.2520(d) contains August 25, 2017 (82 FR 57418) SIP
necessary for attaining and maintaining source-specific requirements, which revision.
TABLE 1—SOURCE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL FROM THE WEST VIRGINIA SIP
EPA approval date/
State effective
Source name Order Federal Register (FR)
date citation
Mountaineer Carbon Company ......................................................... Consent Order ............................ 7/2/82 9/1/82, 47 FR 38532.
Standard Lafarge ............................................................................... Consent Order CO–SIP–91–30 .. 11/14/91 7/25/94, 59 FR 37696.
Follansbee Steel Corporation ............................................................ Consent Order CO–SIP–91–31 .. 11/14/91 7/25/94, 59 FR 37696.
International Mill Service, Inc. ........................................................... Consent Order CO–SIP–91–33 .. 11/14/91 7/25/94, 59 FR 37696.
Columbian Chemicals Company ....................................................... Consent Order CO–SIP–2000–3 1/31/00 8/2/00, 65 FR 47339
III. Public Comments and EPA’s assure the NAAQS are achieved. These would need to comply with the
Responses include nonattainment new source requirements of West Virginia’s permit
review (NSR) and prevention of programs, as applicable including NSR,
EPA received six public comments on significant deterioration (PSD) permit PSD or minor NSR. Specifically, West
the NPR to approve West Virginia’s SIP programs. West Virginia has federally Virginia’s rule 45CSR14, ‘‘Permits for
revision. enforceable NSR and PSD permit the Construction and Major
Comment 1: The commenter programs incorporated in the West Modification of Major Stationary
expressed concern over whether the Virginia SIP. See 45CSR19 (NSR Sources of Air Pollution for the
facilities’ emissions would be regulated program approved 80 FR 29973(May 26, Prevention of Significant Deterioration,’’
through monitoring and guidelines if 2015)), 45CSR14 (PSD program was approved into the West Virginia SIP
they were to re-open. approved 81 FR 53009 (August 11, in 1984 and subsequently revised
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Response 1: CAA section 110(a)(2)(c) 2016)), and 45CSR13 (minor source NSR several times with the latest revision to
and Title I, Parts C and D, as well as program approved 79 FR 42213 (July 21, the SIP in 2015 (81 FR 53009). West
CAA sections 172, 173, and 161 require 2014)). All of the facilities listed in the Virginia’s rule 45CSR13, ‘‘Permits for
states to implement permit programs NPR were permanently shut down, but Construction, Modification, or
consistent with the requirements of the if any were to re-open, or if any new Relocation of Stationary Sources of Air
CAA which regulate construction and sources were to start operating in West Pollutants, and Procedures for
modification of stationary sources to Virginia in the same location, they Registration and Evaluation,’’ requiring
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:37 Mar 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_11940/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 11889
agency promulgating the rule must Corp,’’ ‘‘International Mill Service, Inc,’’ C. Periodic Adjustments of the Threshold
submit a rule report, which includes a and ‘‘Columbian Chemicals Company.’’ Amounts for Reporting Marine
copy of the rule, to each House of the Casualties and SMIs
[FR Doc. 2018–05404 Filed 3–16–18; 8:45 am]
Congress and to the Comptroller General D. Loss of Marine Casualty Data
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
of the United States. Section 804, E. Amending the Dollar Amount
Thresholds for Outer Continental Shelf
however, exempts from section 801 the
Casualty Reporting in Title 33 of the CFR
following types of rules: Rules of F. Use of the CPI–U to Determine Reporting
particular applicability; rules relating to DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY Threshold Amounts
agency management or personnel; and G. Nonsubstantive Changes to Reflect
rules of agency organization, procedure, Coast Guard Updated CG–2692, Report of Marine
or practice that do not substantially Casualty, Commercial Diving Casualty,
affect the rights or obligations of non- 46 CFR Part 4 or OCS-related Casualty
agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because VI. Regulatory Analyses
this is a rule of particular applicability, [Docket No. USCG–2016–0748] A. Regulatory Planning and Review
EPA is not required to submit a rule B. Small Entities
report regarding this action under RIN 1625–AC33 C. Assistance for Small Entities
section 801. D. Collection of Information
Marine Casualty Reporting Property E. Federalism
C. Petitions for Judicial Review Damage Thresholds F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. H. Civil Justice Reform
petitions for judicial review of this ACTION: Final rule. I. Protection of Children
action must be filed in the United States J. Indian Tribal Governments
Court of Appeals for the appropriate SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending K. Energy Effects
circuit by May 18, 2018. Filing a the monetary property damage L. Technical Standards
petition for reconsideration by the threshold amounts for reporting a M. Environment
Administrator of this final rule does not marine casualty and for reporting a type
I. Abbreviations
affect the finality of this action for the of marine casualty called a ‘‘serious
purposes of judicial review nor does it marine incident.’’ The original BLS Bureau of Labor Statistics
extend the time within which a petition regulations that set these dollar CFR Code of Federal Regulations
for judicial review may be filed, and threshold amounts were written in the COI Collection of Information
shall not postpone the effectiveness of 1980s and have not been updated since CPI–U Consumer Price Index for All Urban
such rule or action. This action that time. Because the monetary Consumers
pertaining to removal of source-specific thresholds for reporting have not kept DHS Department of Homeland Security
requirements from the West Virginia SIP pace with inflation, vessel owners and MISLE Marine Information for Safety and
operators have been required to report Law Enforcement
may not be challenged later in
relatively minor casualties. NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
proceedings to enforce its requirements. OCMI Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection
(See section 307(b)(2).) Additionally, the original regulations
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
require mandatory drug and alcohol OMB Office of Management and Budget
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 testing following a serious marine PVA Passenger Vessel Association
Environmental protection, Air incident. As a result, vessel owners and RA Regulatory analysis
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, operators are conducting testing for SMI Serious marine incident
Incorporation by reference, Lead, casualties that are less significant than SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate those intended to be captured by the rulemaking.
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping original regulations. Updating the U.S.C. United States Code
original regulations will reduce the § Section symbol
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds. burden on vessel owners and operators, II. Background, Basis, and Purpose
and will also reduce the amount of
Dated: March 6, 2018. Coast Guard resources expended to Pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 6101, the Coast
Cosmo Servidio, investigate these incidents. Guard is required to prescribe
Regional Administrator, Region III. DATES: This final rule is effective April regulations on marine casualty reporting
18, 2018. and the manner of reporting. Based on
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: this authority, we developed regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
PART 52—APPROVAL AND information about this document, call or in part 4 of title 46 of the Code of
PROMULGATION OF email LCDR Baxter B. Smoak, CG–INV, Federal Regulations (CFR) that
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–1223, included, among other criteria,
email Baxter.B.Smoak@uscg.mil. monetary property damage threshold
amounts for reporting a ‘‘serious marine
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
incident’’ 1 (SMI) and for reporting a
continues to read as follows:
Table of Contents for Preamble marine casualty.2 The original
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. regulations setting these property
I. Abbreviations damage threshold amounts were
Subpart XX—West Virginia II. Background, Basis, and Purpose
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
developed in the 1980s, and they have
III. Regulatory History not been updated since that time. With
§ 52.2520 [Amended] IV. Discussion of Final Rule
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
this final rule, we update the dollar
■ 2. In § 52.2520, the table in paragraph A. Dollar Threshold Amounts for Reporting threshold amounts for property damage
(d) is amended by removing the entries Marine Casualties
for ‘‘Mountaineer Carbon Co,’’ B. Dollar Threshold Amounts for Reporting 1 46 CFR 4.03–2.
‘‘Standard Lafarge,’’ ‘‘Follansbee Steel SMIs 2 46 CFR 4.05–1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:37 Mar 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_11940/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-17 04:24:36
Document Modified: 2018-03-17 04:24:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective on April 18, 2018. | |
| Contact | Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 11887 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR