83 FR 12516 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Attainment Plan for the Warren, Pennsylvania Nonattainment Area for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 56 (March 22, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 56 (March 22, 2018)
| Page Range | 12516-12522 | |
| FR Document | 2018-05876 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 12516-12522] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-05876] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0578; FRL-9975-87-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Attainment Plan for the Warren, Pennsylvania Nonattainment Area for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision, submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP), to EPA on September 29, 2017, for the purpose of providing for attainment of the 2010 1-hour sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) primary national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) in the Warren, Pennsylvania SO2 nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as the ``Warren Area'' or ``Area''). The Warren Area is comprised of a portion of Warren County (Conewango Township, Glade Township, Pleasant Township, and the City of Warren) in Pennsylvania surrounding the United Refining Company (hereafter referred to as ``United Refining''). The SIP submission is an attainment plan which includes the base year emissions inventory, an analysis of the reasonably available control technology (RACT) and reasonably available control measure (RACM) requirements, a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, a modeling demonstration of SO2 attainment, contingency measures, and a nonattainment new source review (NNSR) program for the Warren Area. As part of approving the attainment plan, EPA is also proposing to approve into the Pennsylvania SIP new SO2 emission limits and associated compliance parameters for United Refining. EPA proposes to approve Pennsylvania's attainment plan and concludes that the Warren Area will attain the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date and that the plan meets all applicable requirements under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 23, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03- OAR-2017-0578 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit [[Page 12517]] http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Background for EPA's Proposed Action II. Pennsylvania's Attainment Plan Submittal for the Warren Area III. EPA's Analysis of Pennsylvania's Attainment Plan for the Warren Area A. Pollutants Addressed B. Emissions Inventory Requirements C. Air Quality Modeling D. RACM/RACT E. RFP Plan F. Contingency Measures G. New Source Review IV. EPA's Proposed Action V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background for EPA's Proposed Action On June 2, 2010, the EPA Administrator signed a final rule establishing a new SO2 primary NAAQS as a 1-hour standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb), based on a 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations. See 75 FR 35520 (June 22, 2010), codified at 40 CFR 50.17. This action also revoked the existing 1971 primary annual and 24-hour standards, subject to certain conditions.\1\ EPA established the NAAQS based on significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with short-term exposures to SO2 emissions ranging from 5 minutes to 24 hours with an array of adverse respiratory effects including narrowing of the airways which can cause difficulty breathing (bronchoconstriction) and increased asthma symptoms. For more information regarding the health impacts of SO2, please refer to the June 22, 2010 final rulemaking. See 75 FR 35520. Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required by the CAA to designate areas throughout the United States as attaining or not attaining the NAAQS; this designation process is described in section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. On August 5, 2013, EPA promulgated initial air quality designations for 29 areas for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS (78 FR 47191), which became effective on October 4, 2013, based on violating air quality monitoring data for calendar years 2009-2011, where there were sufficient data to support a nonattainment designation.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ EPA's June 22, 2010, final action revoked the two 1971 primary 24-hour standard of 140 ppb and the annual standard of 30 ppb because they were determined not to add additional public health protection given a 1-hour standard at 75 ppb. See 75 FR 35520. However, the secondary 3-hour SO2 standard was retained. Currently, the 24-hour and annual standards are only revoked for certain of those areas the EPA has already designated for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. See 40 CFR 50.4(e). \2\ EPA is continuing its designation efforts for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. Pursuant to a court-order entered on March 2, 2015, by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, EPA must complete the remaining designations for the rest of the country on a schedule that contains three specific deadlines. Sierra Club, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 13-cv-03953-SI (2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Effective on October 4, 2013, the Warren Area was designated as nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS for an area that encompasses the primary SO2 emitting source United Refining and the nearby SO2 monitor (Air Quality Site ID: 42-123- 0004). The October 4, 2013 final designation triggered a requirement for Pennsylvania to submit a SIP revision with an attainment plan for how the Area would attain the 2010 SO2 NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than October 4, 2018, in accordance with CAA section 172(b). For a number of areas, including the Warren Area, EPA published a notice on March 18, 2016, that Pennsylvania and other pertinent states had failed to submit the required SO2 attainment plan by this submittal deadline. See 81 FR 14736. This finding initiated a deadline under CAA section 179(a) for the potential imposition of new source review and highway funding sanctions. However, pursuant to Pennsylvania's submittal of September 29, 2017, and EPA's subsequent letter dated October 5, 2017, to Pennsylvania finding the submittal complete and noting the stopping of the sanctions deadline, these sanctions under section 179(a) will not be imposed as a consequence of Pennsylvania's having missed the SIP submission deadline. Additionally, under CAA section 110(c), the March 18, 2016 finding triggers a requirement that EPA promulgate a federal implementation plan (FIP) within two years of the effective date of the finding unless, by that time, the state has made the necessary complete submittal and EPA has approved the submittal as meeting applicable requirements. This FIP obligation will not apply if EPA makes final the approval action proposed here by April 18, 2018. Attainment plans must meet the applicable requirements of the CAA, and specifically CAA sections 172, 191, and 192. The required components of an attainment plan submittal are listed in section 172(c) of Title I, part D of the CAA. On April 23, 2014, EPA issued recommended guidance (hereafter 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance) for how state submissions could address the statutory requirements for SO2 attainment plans.\3\ In this guidance, EPA described the statutory requirements for an attainment plan, which include: An accurate base year emissions inventory of current emissions for all sources of SO2 within the nonattainment area (172(c)(3)); an attainment demonstration that includes a modeling analysis showing that the enforceable emissions limitations and other control measures taken by the state will provide for expeditious attainment of the NAAQS (172(c)); demonstration of RFP (172(c)(2)); implementation of RACM, including RACT (172(c)(1)); NNSR requirements (172(c)(5)); and adequate contingency measures for the affected area (172(c)(9)). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See ``Guidance for 1-Hour SO2 Nonattainment Area SIP Submissions'' (April 23, 2014), available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/20140423guidance_nonattainment_sip.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Pennsylvania's Attainment Plan Submittal for the Warren Area In accordance with section 172(c) of the CAA, the Pennsylvania attainment plan for the Warren Area includes: (1) An emissions inventory for SO2 for the plan's base year (2011); and (2) an attainment demonstration. The attainment demonstration includes the following: Analyses that locate, identify, and quantify sources of emissions contributing to violations of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS; a determination that the control strategy for the primary SO2 source within the nonattainment areas constitutes RACM/ RACT; a dispersion modeling analysis of an emissions control strategy for the primary SO2 source (United Refining), which also accounts for smaller sources within the Area in the background concentration, showing attainment of the SO2 NAAQS by the October 4, 2018, attainment date; requirements for RFP toward attaining the SO2 NAAQS in the Area; contingency measures; the assertion that Pennsylvania's existing SIP-approved NSR program meets the applicable requirements for SO2 ; and the request that emission limitations and compliance parameters for United Refining be incorporated into the SIP. III. EPA's Analysis of Pennsylvania's Attainment Plan for the Warren Area Consistent with CAA requirements (see section 172), an attainment demonstration for an SO2 nonattainment area must include a showing that the area will attain the 2010 SO2 NAAQS as [[Page 12518]] expeditiously as practicable. The demonstration must also meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51.112 and 40 CFR part 51, Appendix W, and include inventory data, modeling results, and emissions reductions analyses on which the state has based its projected attainment. EPA is proposing to conclude that the attainment plan submitted by Pennsylvania meets all applicable requirements of the CAA, and EPA is proposing to approve the plan submitted by Pennsylvania to ensure ongoing attainment in the Warren Area. A. Pollutants Addressed Pennsylvania's SO2 attainment plan evaluates SO2 emissions for the area within the portion of Warren County (Conewango Township, Glade Township, Pleasant Township, and the City of Warren) that is designated nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. There are no precursors to consider for the SO2 attainment plan. SO2 is a pollutant that arises from direct emissions, and therefore concentrations are highest relatively close to the sources and much lower at greater distances due to dispersion. Thus, SO2 concentration patterns resemble those of other directly emitted pollutants like lead, and differ from those of photochemically-formed (secondary) pollutants such as ozone. Pennsylvania's attainment plan appropriately considered SO2 emissions for the Indiana Area. B. Emissions Inventory Requirements States are required under section 172(c)(3) of the CAA to develop comprehensive, accurate and current emissions inventories of all sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in the nonattainment area. These inventories provide detailed accounting of all emissions and emissions sources by precursor or pollutant. In addition, inventories are used in air quality modeling to demonstrate that attainment of the NAAQS is as expeditious as practicable. The 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance provides that the emissions inventory should be consistent with the Air Emissions Reporting Requirements (AERR) at Subpart A to 40 CFR part 51.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ The AERR at Subpart A to 40 CFR part 51 cover overarching federal reporting requirements for the states to submit emissions inventories for criteria pollutants to EPA's Emissions Inventory System. EPA uses these submittals, along with other data sources, to build the National Emissions Inventory. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the base year inventory of actual emissions, a ``comprehensive, accurate and current'' inventory can be represented by a year that contributed to the three-year design value used for the original nonattainment designation. The 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance notes that the base year inventory should include all sources of SO2 in the nonattainment area as well as any sources located outside the nonattainment area which may affect attainment in the area. Pennsylvania appropriately elected to use 2011 as the base year. Actual emissions from all the sources of SO2 in the Warren Area were reviewed and compiled for the base year emissions inventory requirement. The primary SO2 -emitting point source located within the Warren Area is United Refining, a petroleum refinery. United Refining consists of 29 main SO2 emitters, which include boilers, heaters, reboilers, compressors, and flares. More information on the emissions inventory for the Warren Area can be found in Pennsylvania's September 29, 2017, submittal as well as EPA's emissions inventory Technical Support Document (TSD), which can be found under Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0578 and which provides EPA's analysis of the emissions inventory. Table 1 shows the level of emissions, expressed in tons per year (tpy), in the Warren Area for the 2011 base year by emissions source category. The point source category includes all sources within the nonattainment area. Table 1--2011 Base Year SO2 Emissions Inventory for the Warren Area ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SO2 Emission source category Emissions (tpy) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Point....................................................... 993.095 Area........................................................ 85.852 Non-road.................................................... 0.337 On-road..................................................... 1.380 Total....................................................... 1,080.664 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EPA has evaluated Pennsylvania's 2011 base year emissions inventory for the Warren Area and has made the determination that this inventory was developed in a manner consistent with EPA's guidance. Therefore, pursuant to section 172(c)(3), EPA is proposing to approve Pennsylvania's 2011 base year emissions inventory for the Warren Area. The attainment demonstration also provides for a projected attainment year inventory that includes estimated emissions for all emission sources of SO2 which are determined to impact the nonattainment area for the year in which the area is expected to attain the NAAQS. Pennsylvania provided a 2018 projected emissions inventory for all known sources included in the 2011 base year inventory. The projected 2018 emissions are shown in Table 2. Pennsylvania's submittal asserts that the SO2 emissions are expected to decrease by approximately 436 tons, or 40%, by 2018 from the 2011 base year. More information on the projected emissions for the Warren Area can be found in Pennsylvania's September 29, 2017, submittal, and EPA's analysis of the emissions inventories can be found in EPA's emissions inventory TSD, which can be found under Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0578. EPA proposes to approve the 2011 base year inventory and the 2018 projected inventory as they meet CAA requirements. Table 2--2018 Projected SO2 Emission Inventory for the Warren Area ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SO2 Emission source category Emissions (tpy) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Point....................................................... 511.199 Area........................................................ 132.48 Non-road.................................................... 0.170 On-road..................................................... 0.530 Total....................................................... 644.379 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. Air Quality Modeling The SO2 attainment demonstration provides an air quality dispersion modeling analysis to demonstrate that control strategies chosen to reduce SO2 source emissions will bring the Area into attainment by the statutory attainment date of October 4, 2018. The modeling analysis, following recommendations outlined in Appendix W to 40 CFR part 51 (EPA's Modeling Guidance), is used for the attainment demonstration to assess the control strategy for a nonattainment area and establish emission limits that will provide for attainment. The analysis requires five years of meteorological data to simulate the dispersion of pollutant plumes from multiple point, area, or volume sources across the averaging times of interest. The modeling demonstration typically also relies on maximum allowable emissions from sources in the nonattainment area. Though the actual emissions are likely to be below the allowable emissions, sources have the ability to run at higher production rates or optimize controls such that emissions approach the allowable emissions limits. A modeling analysis that provides for attainment under all scenarios of operation for each source must therefore consider the worst case scenario of both the meteorology (e.g. predominant wind directions, stagnation, etc.) and the maximum allowable emissions. [[Page 12519]] PADEP's modeling analysis was developed in accordance with EPA's Modeling Guidance and the 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance, and was prepared using EPA's preferred dispersion modeling system, the American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD). A more detailed discussion of PADEP's modeling analysis for the Warren Area can be found in Pennsylvania's September 29, 2017 submittal, and EPA's analysis of the modeling is discussed in more detail in EPA's modeling TSD, which can be found under Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0578. EPA has reviewed the modeling that Pennsylvania submitted to support the attainment demonstration for the Warren Area and has determined that this modeling is consistent with CAA requirements, Appendix W, and EPA's guidance for SO2 attainment demonstration modeling. The modeling properly characterized source limits, local meteorological data, background concentrations, and provided an adequate model receptor grid to capture maximum modeled concentrations. Using the EPA conversion factor for the SO2 NAAQS, the final modeled design value for the Warren Area is less than 75 ppb.\5\ Therefore, EPA is proposing to determine that the analysis demonstrates that the source limits used in the modeling demonstration comply with the 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. EPA's analysis of the modeling is discussed in more detail in EPA's modeling TSD, which can be found under Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0578. EPA proposes to conclude that the modeling provided in the attainment plan shows that the Warren Area will attain the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS by the attainment date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The SO2 NAAQS level is expressed in ppb but AERMOD gives results in [micro]g/m\3\. The conversion factor for SO2 (at the standard conditions applied in the ambient SO2 reference method) is 1 ppb = approximately 2.619 [micro]g/m\3\. See Pennsylvania's SO2 Round 3 Designations proposed TSD at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-08/documents/35_pa_so2_rd3-final.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- D. RACM/RACT CAA section 172(c)(1) requires that each attainment plan provide for the implementation of all reasonably available control measures (i.e., RACM) as expeditiously as practicable and shall provide for attainment of the NAAQS. EPA interprets RACM, including RACT, under section 172, as measures that a state determines to be both reasonably available and contribute to attainment as expeditiously as practicable ``for existing sources in the area.'' Pennsylvania's September 29, 2017 submittal discusses federal and state measures that will provide emission reductions leading to attainment and maintenance of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. With regards to state rules, Pennsylvania cites to its low sulfur fuel rules, which were SIP-approved on July 10, 2014 (79 FR 39330). Pennsylvania's low sulfur fuel oil provisions apply to refineries, pipelines, terminals, retail outlet fuel storage facilities, commercial and industrial facilities, and facilities with unit burning regulated fuel oil to produce electricity and for domestic home heaters. These low sulfur fuel oil rules reduce the amount of sulfur in fuel oils used in combustion units, thereby reducing SO2 emissions and the formation of sulfates that cause decreased visibility. In terms of federal measures, Pennsylvania explains that 19 sources at United Refining are required to comply with the Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT), as well as four sources that are required to comply with 40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Petroleum Refineries (the Refinery MACT 2). EPA notes that although Pennsylvania incorporates by reference the NESHAP and MACT, they are not in the Pennsylvania SIP. Pennsylvania's submittal discusses that enforceable emission changes have been in place at United Refining since 2015 that reduce the SO2 emissions from the facility. The facility switched from high sulfur (2.8% sulfur) fuel oil to a lower sulfur fuel oil (0.5% sulfur) in 11 combustion units and heaters. Also, in July 2015, United Refining increased the amount of the flue gas desulfurization additive (De-Sox) used for one of the emitting source's (Source ID 101A) catalyst, which prevents the formation of SO2 during the catalyst regeneration process. Based on the modeling analysis discussed in section IV.C. Air Quality Modeling, in order to ensure that the Warren Area demonstrates attainment with the SO2 NAAQS, emission limits established in a Consent Order and Agreement (COA) (see Appendix B of the September 29, 2017 submittal) between PADEP and United Refining, will be used to control SO2 emissions from United Refining. The collective emission limits and related compliance parameters have been proposed for incorporation into the SIP to make these changes federally enforceable. The compliance parameters include United Refining burning certain fuel types; monitoring, record-keeping, and reporting; conducting emission testing; using De-Sox additive where appropriate; and using continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS). PADEP asserts that this proposed control strategy lowers the modeled SO2 impacts from United Refining and is sufficient for the Warren Area to attain the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. The new emission limits for each of the SO2 -emitting sources at United Refining are listed in Table 3. PADEP affirms that the implementation of new emission limits and corresponding compliance parameters serve as RACM/RACT at United Refining, and will enable the Warren Area to attain and maintain the SO2 NAAQS. Table 3--United Refining New Emission Limits ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SO2 Emission limit (pounds Source ID Source description per hour or lbs/hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 031, 032, 033.................. Boiler 1, 2, and 3..... 27.42 034............................ Boiler 4............... 7.21 036............................ Boiler 5B.............. 0.24 042............................ FCC Heater............. 1.10 044............................ DHT Heater 1........... 0.10 049............................ East Reformer Heater... 22.42 050............................ Crude Heater--North.... 27.78 050A........................... Crude Heater--South.... 27.78 051............................ Pretreater Heater...... 11.00 [[Page 12520]] 052............................ West Reformer Heater... 2.20 053............................ Sat Gas Plant Reboiler. 0.40 054............................ Vacuum Process Heater.. 0.80 055............................ DHT Heater 2........... 6.36 056............................ Prefactionator Reboiler 5.37 2. 057............................ Volcanic Heater (T-241) 0.30 101A........................... FCC Unit............... 131.50 102............................ Blowdown System--Combo 0.40 Flare. 102............................ Blowdown System--FCC 0.10 Flare. 105............................ Middle FCC KVG 0.14 Compressor. 106............................ East FCC KVG Compressor 0.14 107............................ Sat Gas KVG Compressor. 0.10 108............................ Claus Sulfur Plant 2... 12.00 108A........................... Sulfur Plant 2 Hot Oil 0.10 Heater. 211............................ Loading Rack Bottom 0.81 Loading. 037............................ Boiler 6............... 4.60 1010........................... SMR Hydrogen Plant..... 0.099 C1010.......................... Elevated Process Flare. 0.47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EPA is proposing to approve Pennsylvania's determination that the proposed SO2 control strategy at United Refining constitutes RACM/RACT for that source in the Warren Area based on the modeling analysis previously described. The Area is projected to begin showing attaining monitoring values for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS by the 2018 attainment date. Furthermore, PADEP requests that the emission limits listed in Table 3 and corresponding compliance parameters found in the unredacted portions of the COA for United Refining will become permanent and enforceable SIP measures to meet the requirements of the CAA. EPA, therefore, proposes to approve Pennsylvania's September 29, 2017, SIP submittal as meeting the RACM/RACT requirements of section 172(c) of the CAA. E. RFP Plan Section 172(c)(2) of the CAA requires that an attainment plan include a demonstration that shows reasonable further progress (i.e., RFP) for meeting air quality standards will be achieved through generally linear incremental improvement in air quality. Section 171(1) of the CAA defines RFP as ``such annual incremental reductions in emissions of the relevant air pollutant as are required by this part (part D) or may reasonably be required by EPA for the purpose of ensuring attainment of the applicable NAAQS by the applicable attainment date.'' As stated originally in the 1994 SO2 Guidelines Document \6\ and repeated in the 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance, EPA continues to believe that this definition is most appropriate for pollutants that are emitted from numerous and diverse sources, where the relationship between particular sources and ambient air quality are not directly quantified. In such cases, emissions reductions may be required from various types and locations of sources. The relationship between SO2 and sources is much more defined, and usually there is a single step between pre-control nonattainment and post-control attainment. Therefore, EPA interpreted RFP for SO2 as adherence to an ambitious compliance schedule in both the 1994 SO2 Guideline Document and the 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance. The control measures for attainment of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS included in Pennsylvania's submittal have been modeled to achieve attainment of the NAAQS. The permits and the adoption of specific emission limits and compliance parameters require these control measures and resulting emission reductions to be achieved as expeditiously as practicable. As a result, based on air quality modeling reviewed by EPA, this is projected to yield a sufficient reduction in SO2 emissions from United Refining resulting in modeled attainment of the SO2 NAAQS for the Warren Area. Therefore, EPA has determined that PADEP's SO2 attainment plan fulfills the RFP requirements for the Warren Area. EPA does not anticipate future nonattainment, or that the Area will not meet the October 4, 2018, attainment date. EPA proposes to approve Pennsylvania's attainment plan with respect to the RFP requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ SO2 Guideline Document, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711, EPA-452/R-94-008, February 1994. Located at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1pgm.html. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- F. Contingency Measures In accordance with section 172(c)(9) of the CAA, contingency measures are required as additional measures to be implemented in the event that an area fails to meet the RFP requirements or fails to attain the standard by its attainment date. These measures must be fully adopted rules or control measures that can be implemented quickly and without additional EPA or state action if the area fails to meet RFP requirements or fails to meet its attainment date, and should contain trigger mechanisms and an implementation schedule. However, SO2 presents special considerations. As stated in the final 2010 SO2 NAAQS promulgation on June 22, 2010 (75 FR 35520) and in the 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance, EPA concluded that because of the quantifiable relationship between SO2 sources and control measures, it is appropriate that state agencies develop a comprehensive program to identify sources of violations of the SO2 NAAQS and undertake an aggressive follow-up for compliance and enforcement. The United Refining COA (see Appendix B of the September 29, 2017 submittal) contains the following measures that are designed to keep the Warren Area from triggering an exceedance or violation of the SO2 NAAQS: (1) If the SO2 emissions from the FCC Unit (Source ID 101A) exceeds the validated lbs/hr permitted emission limit listed in Table 3, the facility will [[Page 12521]] perform an audit of the unit's SO2 control additive system, which will include injection of the proper amount of De-SOx additive, and within 45 days of the exceedance, submit a report to PADEP; (2) If the Warren Overlook SO2 ambient air quality monitor (ID 42- 123-0005) located within the nonattainment area measures a third daily maximum 1-hour SO2 concentration for any hour greater than 75 parts per billion (ppb) within a calendar year (if this occurs on two days back-to-back, it will be counted as one; if there are three days in a row, it will be counted as two), after verification and notification by PADEP, within 90 calendar days, United Refining must submit an investigative report to PADEP. If the report concludes that SO2 emissions from one or more SO2 -emitting sources at the facility caused an exceedance, the report must include proposed changes in the facility operations that would be needed in order to avoid a violation of the SO2 NAAQS; (3) If PADEP identifies a daily maximum SO2 concentration exceeding 75 ppb at a PADEP-operated SO2 ambient air quality monitor in the Warren Area, within five days, PADEP will contact United Refining to trigger the implementation of the daily exceedance report contingency measure described above in (2); (4) Section 4(27) of the Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act (APCA) authorizes PADEP to take any action it deems necessary or proper for the effective enforcement of APCA and the rules and regulations promulgated under APCA. Such actions include the issuance of orders and the assessment of civil penalties. EPA is proposing to find that Pennsylvania's September 29, 2017 submittal includes sufficient measures to expeditiously identify the source of any violation of the SO2 NAAQS and for aggressive follow-up including enforcement measures within PADEP's authority as necessary. Therefore, EPA proposes that the contingency measures submitted by Pennsylvania follow the 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance and meet the section 172(c)(9) requirements. G. New Source Review \7\ \7\ The CAA new source review (NSR) program is composed of three separate programs: Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD), Nonattainment NSR (NNSR), and Minor NSR. PSD is established in part C of title I of the CAA and applies in undesignated areas and in areas that meet the NAAQS-- ``attainment areas''--as well as areas where there is insufficient information to determine if the area meets the NAAQS--designated ``unclassifiable areas.'' The NNSR program is established in part D of title I of the CAA and applies in areas that are not in attainment of the NAAQS--``nonattainment areas.'' The Minor NSR program addresses construction or modification activities that do not qualify as ``major'' and applies regardless of the designation of the area in which a source is located. Together, these programs are referred to as the NSR programs. Section 173 of the CAA lays out the NNSR program for preconstruction review of new major sources or major modifications to existing sources, as required by CAA section 172(c)(5). The programmatic elements for NNSR include, among other things, compliance with the lowest achievable emissions rate and the requirement to obtain emissions offsets. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 172(c)(5) of the CAA requires that an attainment plan require permits for the construction and operation of new or modified major stationary sources in a nonattainment area. Pennsylvania has a fully implemented nonattainment new source review (NNSR) program for criteria pollutants in 25 Pennsylvania Code Chapter 127, Subchapter E, which was approved into the Pennsylvania SIP on December 9, 1997 (62 FR 64722). On May 14, 2012 (77 FR 28261), EPA approved a SIP revision pertaining to the pre-construction permitting requirements of Pennsylvania's NNSR program to update the regulations to meet EPA's 2002 NSR reform regulations. EPA then approved an update to Pennsylvania's NNSR regulations on July 13, 2012 (77 FR 41276). These rules provide for appropriate new source review as required by CAA sections 175(c)(5) and 173 and 40 CFR 51.165 for SO2 sources undergoing construction or major modification in the Warren Area without need for modification of the approved rules. Therefore, EPA concludes that the Pennsylvania SIP meets the requirements of section 172(c)(5) for this Area. IV. EPA's Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve Pennsylvania's SIP revision for the Warren Area, as submitted through PADEP to EPA on September 29, 2017 for the purpose of demonstrating attainment of the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve the base year emissions inventory, a modeling demonstration of SO2 attainment, an analysis of RACM/RACT, a RFP plan, and contingency measures for the Warren Area, and is proposing that the Pennsylvania SIP has met requirements for NSR for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. Additionally, EPA is proposing to approve into the Pennsylvania SIP specific SO2 emission limits and compliance parameters established for the SO2 source impacting the Warren Area. EPA has determined that Pennsylvania's SO2 attainment plan for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS for Warren County meets the applicable requirements of the CAA and comports with EPA's recommendations discussed in the 2014 SO2 Nonattainment Guidance. Thus, EPA is proposing to approve Pennsylvania's attainment plan for the Warren Area as submitted on September 29, 2017. EPA's analysis for this proposed action is discussed in Section IV of this proposed rulemaking. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. Final approval of this SIP submittal will remove EPA's duty to promulgate and implement a FIP under CAA section 110(c). V. Incorporation by Reference In this proposed rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the portions of the Consent Order and Agreement entered between Pennsylvania and United Refining Company on September 29, 2017, that are not redacted. This includes emission limits and associated compliance parameters, record-keeping and reporting, and contingency measures. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through http://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section of this preamble for more information). VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); [[Page 12522]] Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule, concerning the SO 2 attainment plan for the Warren nonattainment area in Pennsylvania, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: March 13, 2018. Cecil Rodrigues, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2018-05876 Filed 3-21-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![12516 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 56 / Thursday, March 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
that includes incorporation by • Does not provide EPA with the comprised of a portion of Warren
reference. In accordance with the discretionary authority to address, as County (Conewango Township, Glade
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are appropriate, disproportionate human Township, Pleasant Township, and the
proposing to incorporate by reference health or environmental effects, using City of Warren) in Pennsylvania
revisions to Oklahoma’s regulations, as practicable and legally permissible surrounding the United Refining
described in the Proposed Action methods, under Executive Order 12898 Company (hereafter referred to as
section above. The EPA has made, and (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). ‘‘United Refining’’). The SIP submission
will continue to make, these documents In addition, the SIP is not approved to is an attainment plan which includes
generally available electronically apply on any Indian reservation land or the base year emissions inventory, an
through www.regulations.gov and in in any other area where EPA or an analysis of the reasonably available
hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office. Indian tribe has demonstrated that a control technology (RACT) and
V. Statutory and Executive Order tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of reasonably available control measure
Reviews Indian country, the proposed rule does (RACM) requirements, a reasonable
not have tribal implications and will not further progress (RFP) plan, a modeling
Under the Act, the Administrator is impose substantial direct costs on tribal demonstration of SO2 attainment,
required to approve a SIP submission governments or preempt tribal law as contingency measures, and a
that complies with the provisions of the specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 nonattainment new source review
Act and applicable Federal regulations. FR 67249, November 9, 2000). (NNSR) program for the Warren Area.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). As part of approving the attainment
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
plan, EPA is also proposing to approve
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, Environmental protection, Air into the Pennsylvania SIP new SO2
provided that they meet the criteria of pollution control, Hydrocarbons, emission limits and associated
the Act. Accordingly, this action merely Incorporation by reference, compliance parameters for United
proposes to approve state law as Intergovernmental relations, Reporting Refining. EPA proposes to approve
meeting Federal requirements and does and recordkeeping requirements, Pennsylvania’s attainment plan and
not impose additional requirements Volatile organic compounds. concludes that the Warren Area will
beyond those imposed by state law. For attain the 2010 1-hour primary SO2
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
that reason, this action: NAAQS by the applicable attainment
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Dated: March 16, 2018.
date and that the plan meets all
action’’ subject to review by the Office Anne Idsal,
applicable requirements under the
of Management and Budget under Regional Administrator, Region 6. Clean Air Act (CAA).
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, [FR Doc. 2018–05766 Filed 3–21–18; 8:45 am]
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DATES: Written comments must be
January 21, 2011); received on or before April 23, 2018.
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
action because SIP approvals are AGENCY OAR–2017–0578 at http://
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information www.regulations.gov, or via email to
40 CFR Part 52
collection burden under the provisions spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0578; FRL–9975–87– comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Region 3]
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); follow the online instructions for
• Is certified as not having a submitting comments. Once submitted,
Approval and Promulgation of Air comments cannot be edited or removed
significant economic impact on a Quality Implementation Plans;
substantial number of small entities from Regulations.gov. For either manner
Pennsylvania; Attainment Plan for the of submission, EPA may publish any
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Warren, Pennsylvania Nonattainment
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); comment received to its public docket.
Area for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Do not submit electronically any
• Does not contain any unfunded Primary National Ambient Air Quality
mandate or significantly or uniquely information you consider to be
Standard confidential business information (CBI)
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AGENCY: Environmental Protection or other information whose disclosure is
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Agency (EPA). restricted by statute. Multimedia
• Does not have Federalism ACTION: Proposed rule. submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
implications as specified in Executive accompanied by a written comment.
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection The written comment is considered the
1999); Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a official comment and should include
• Is not an economically significant state implementation plan (SIP) discussion of all points you wish to
regulatory action based on health or revision, submitted by the make. EPA will generally not consider
safety risks subject to Executive Order Commonwealth of Pennsylvania comments or comment contents located
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); through the Pennsylvania Department of outside of the primary submission (i.e.
• Is not a significant regulatory action Environmental Protection (PADEP), to on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR EPA on September 29, 2017, for the system). For additional submission
28355, May 22, 2001); purpose of providing for attainment of methods, please contact the person
• Is not subject to requirements of the 2010 1-hour sulfur dioxide (SO2) identified in the FOR FURTHER
section 12(d) of the National primary national ambient air quality INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
Technology Transfer and Advancement standard (NAAQS) in the Warren, full EPA public comment policy,
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because Pennsylvania SO2 nonattainment area information about CBI or multimedia
application of those requirements would (hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Warren submissions, and general guidance on
be inconsistent with the Act; and Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’). The Warren Area is making effective comments, please visit
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:44 Mar 21, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM 22MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_12572/page/1.svg)
![12522 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 56 / Thursday, March 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
• Is certified as not having a ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Docket: The index to the docket for
significant economic impact on a AGENCY this action is available electronically at
substantial number of small entities www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 40 CFR Part 52 at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); [EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0843; FRL–9975–28- Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
• Does not contain any unfunded Region 6]
the index, some information may be
mandate or significantly or uniquely Approval and Promulgation of Air publicly available only at the hard copy
affect small governments, as described Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Infrastructure and Interstate Transport some may not be publicly available at
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); for the 2012 Fine Particulate Matter either location (e.g., CBI).
• Does not have federalism Ambient Air Quality Standard FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
implications as specified in Executive AGENCY: Environmental Protection Sherry Fuerst, (214) 665–6454,
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Agency (EPA). fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. To inspect the
1999); hard copy materials, please schedule an
ACTION: Proposed rule.
• Is not an economically significant appointment with her or Bill Deese at
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act (214) 665–7253.
regulatory action based on health or
(CAA or the Act), the Environmental SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
approve elements of a State or ‘‘our’’ mean EPA.
• Is not a significant regulatory action Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR I. Background
from the State of Texas for the 2012
28355, May 22, 2001); primary fine particulate matter (PM2.5) Below is a short discussion of the
• Is not subject to requirements of National Ambient Air Quality Standard background of the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
Section 12(d) of the National (NAAQS). This submittal addresses how addressed in this notice. For more
the existing SIP provides for information, please see the Technical
Technology Transfer and Advancement
implementation, maintenance, and Support Document (TSD) and EPA
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
enforcement of the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS website http://www3.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/
application of those requirements would .
be inconsistent with the CAA; and (infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP
ensures that the Texas SIP is adequate EPA has regulated PM since 1971,
• Does not provide EPA with the to meet the state’s responsibilities under when we published the first NAAQS for
discretionary authority to address, as the CAA. PM (36 FR 8186, April 30, 1971). Most
appropriate, disproportionate human recently, by notice dated January 15,
DATES: Written comments must be
health or environmental effects, using 2013, following a periodic review of the
received on or before April 23, 2018.
practicable and legally permissible NAAQS for PM2.5, EPA revised the
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
methods, under Executive Order 12898 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS to 12.0
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– mg/m3 and retained the secondary PM2.5
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). OAR–2015–0843, at http:// annual standard of 15 mg/m3 as well as
In addition, this proposed rule, www.regulations.gov or via email to the 24-hour PM2.5 primary and
concerning the SO2 attainment plan for fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. Follow the secondary standards of 35 mg/m3 (78 FR
the Warren nonattainment area in online instructions for submitting
3086, December 14, 2012). The primary
Pennsylvania, does not have tribal comments. Once submitted, comments
NAAQS is designed to protect human
implications as specified by Executive cannot be edited or removed from
health, and the secondary NAAQS is
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
designed to protect the public welfare.
2000), because the SIP is not approved any comment received to its public Each state must submit an i-SIP
to apply in Indian country located in the docket. Do not submit electronically any within three years after the
State, and EPA notes that it will not information you consider to be promulgation of a new or revised
Confidential Business Information (CBI) NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
or other information whose disclosure is includes a list of specific elements the
governments or preempt tribal law.
restricted by statute. Multimedia i-SIP must meet. On September 13,
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 2013, the EPA issued guidance
accompanied by a written comment. addressing the i-SIP elements for
Environmental protection, Air The written comment is considered the NAAQS.1 On December 1, 2015, the
pollution control, Incorporation by official comment and should include Chairman of the Texas Commission on
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping discussion of all points you wish to Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
requirements, Sulfur oxides. make. The EPA will generally not submitted an i-SIP revision to address
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. consider comments or comment the revised NAAQS for 2012 PM2.5.2
contents located outside of the primary
Dated: March 13, 2018. submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 1 ‘‘Guidance on Infrastructure State
Cecil Rodrigues, other file sharing system). For Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. additional submission methods, please Air Act sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2),’’
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
contact Sherry Fuerst, (214) 665–6454, Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, September 13,
[FR Doc. 2018–05876 Filed 3–21–18; 8:45 am] 2013.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. For the full EPA 2 Additional information, including the history of
public comment policy, information the priority pollutants, their levels forms and
about CBI or multimedia submissions, determination of compliance; EPA approach for
and general guidance on making reviewing i-SIP submittal and EPA’s evaluation; the
statute and regulatory citations in the Texas SIP
effective comments, please visit http:// specific to the review the specific i-SIP applicable
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting- CAA and EPA regulatory citations, Federal Register
epa-dockets. Notice citations for the Texas SIP approvals; Texas
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:44 Mar 21, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM 22MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_12572/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-22 01:25:03
Document Modified: 2018-03-22 01:25:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before April 23, 2018. | |
| Contact | Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 12516 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur Oxides |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR