83 FR 13466 - Tuna Conventions Act; Advance Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory Amendments to Procedures for the Active and Inactive Vessel Register
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 61 (March 29, 2018)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 61 (March 29, 2018)
| Page Range | 13466-13468 | |
| FR Document | 2018-06373 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 13466-13468] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-06373] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 300 [Docket No. 171227999-8273-01] RIN 0648-BH48 Tuna Conventions Act; Advance Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory Amendments to Procedures for the Active and Inactive Vessel Register AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is considering amending regulations governing the utilization of purse seine vessel capacity limits associated with the Regional Vessel Register of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. This advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) is intended to provide notice to the public of our planning efforts and request comment that will assist in identifying revised administrative processes to improve the efficient utilization and management of capacity limits. This information will help inform our evaluation of what, if any, regulatory amendments are necessary and advisable. DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing by April 30, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030, by any of the following methods:Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Mail: Attn: Heidi Taylor, Highly Migratory Species Branch Chief, NMFS West Coast Region, 501 W Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier ``NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030'' in the comments. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Studt, NMFS West Coast Region, 562-980-4073. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background on the IATTC The United States is a member of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), which was established under the 1949 Convention for the Establishment of an Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. In 2003, the IATTC adopted the Convention for the Strengthening of the IATTC Established by the 1949 [[Page 13467]] Convention between the United States of America and the Republic of Costa Rica (Antigua Convention). The Antigua Convention entered into force in 2010. The United States acceded to the Antigua Convention on February 24, 2016. The full text of the Antigua Convention is available at: https://www.iattc.org/PDFFiles2/Antigua_Convention_Jun_2003.pdf. The IATTC consists of 21 Members and five Cooperating Non-Members and facilitates the conservation and management of highly migratory species of fish in the IATTC Convention Area (Convention Area), as well as conducting scientific research on these species. The Convention Area is defined as the waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean (EPO) within the area bounded by the west coast of the Americas, the 50[deg] N latitude, the 150[deg] W longitude, and the 50[deg] S latitude. Obligations of the United States Under the IATTC Convention As a Party to the Antigua Convention and a member of the IATTC, the United States is legally bound to implement certain decisions of the IATTC. The Tuna Conventions Act (16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), as amended on November 5, 2015, by Title II of Public Law 114-81, directs that the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State and, with respect to enforcement measures, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, may promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the United States' international obligations under the Antigua Convention, including recommendations and decisions adopted by the IATTC. The Secretary of Commerce's authority to promulgate such regulations has been delegated to NMFS. In June 2000, the IATTC adopted Resolution C-00-06: Resolution on a Regional Vessel Register. This Resolution has been amended, including most recently through adoption of Resolution C-14-01, which requires that Members submit a list of all vessels authorized to fish in the EPO to be listed on a Regional Vessel Register (Register). Purse seine vessels are further categorized on the Register as either ``active'' or ``inactive and sunk'' (inactive). Recognizing concerns of excess fishing capacity, the IATTC in 2002 adopted Resolution C-02-03: Resolution on the Capacity of the Tuna Fleet Operating in the Eastern Pacific Ocean (Revised). The Resolution established a vessel capacity limit of 158,000 cubic meters for all purse seine vessels authorized by the IATTC to fish for tuna species in the EPO. The Resolution further specified that each Member and Cooperating Non-Member was allocated a purse seine vessel capacity limit by the IATTC based on historical fishing levels in the EPO, the level of tuna stocks, and other relevant factors. Pursuant to C-02-03, the United States was allocated a purse seine capacity limit of 31,866 cubic meters (m\3\). Each U.S. purse seine vessel listed on the Register, either as active or inactive, counts towards this U.S. capacity limit, except those utilizing a single-trip option exemption as described at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(1). Background on the Pacific Purse Seine Fleet Since 1971, the number of large (greater than 400 short tons (st) or 362.8 metric tons (mt) carrying capacity) U.S. purse seine vessels fishing for tuna in the EPO has decreased from over 155 to an average of 10 active and inactive large U.S purse seine vessels over the past five years, utilizing an average of roughly 18,209 m\3\ of capacity. Most of the U.S. vessels that historically fished in the EPO have either re-flagged or are now active in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO), fishing under the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission and a treaty between the United States and certain Pacific Island States (the Treaty on Fisheries between the Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the United States of America, also known as the South Pacific Tuna Treaty (SPTT)). The number of vessels in the U.S. WCPO purse seine fishery has also gradually decreased; shrinking from the late 1990s until 2006, and it has fluctuated since. In recent years, the U.S. WCPO purse seine fleet has included an average of 37 vessels, with a maximum of 40 vessels allowed to fish under the SPTT. These 37 vessels amount to roughly 55,000 m\3\ of carrying capacity for reference. In the last few years, changing operating conditions in the WCPO and an increase in the costs assessed to U.S. purse seiners for fishing under the SPTT has led to an increased number of large purse seine vessels seeking to be added to the IATTC Register. In 2016, 17 of the 37 purse seiners authorized to fish in the WCPO also fished in the EPO, which means they either utilized capacity on the Active Register or fished under the single-trip option exemption. Additionally, since 2014, small (less than or equal to 400 st or 362.8 mt carrying capacity) coastal purse seiners have had increased opportunities for catching tuna locally, leading to a growing number of small purse seine vessels utilizing active capacity on the Register. Over the last 5 years, an average of 17 small U.S. purse seine vessels have utilized 1,945 m\3\ of capacity. This combination of interest by large and small purse seine vessel has led to the U.S. capacity on the Register to become fully allocated in recent years, such that no additional vessels could be added to the Register. The total capacity of requested vessels have exceeded the available capacity and NMFS anticipates this trend may continue. Thus, NMFS seeks to re-examine the administrative processes associated with the Register to ensure that capacity is being utilized to the full extent possible in the most effective way for both large and small purse seine vessels. U.S. Regulations on the Regional Vessel Register NMFS has implemented regulations governing U.S. purse seine vessels on the Register at 50 CFR 300.22(b). These regulations include the process for how vessel owners or managing owners request a purse seine vessel be added to the Register, including when and how to submit such a request; when and how to obtain the appropriate vessel and operator permits; pay the vessel assessment fee; and how vessels permitted and authorized under an alternative international tuna purse seine fisheries management regime in the Pacific Ocean may utilize a one-trip option into the EPO while being exempted from the requirement to be included on the Register. The regulations also address processes for removing a vessel from the Register and for replacing those vessels, and establishes criteria to deem requests for active status as ``frivolous'' for vessels that occupy U.S. capacity on the Register but do not actually fish in a given year. Furthermore, the regulations lay out the prioritization of requests following a specified hierarchy. Requests for active status are prioritized according to the hierarchy listed at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(4)(i)(C). In general, the requests are prioritized in the following order: Vessels that were listed as active on the Register in the previous year, vessels that were listed as inactive on the Register in the previous year, vessels not listed on the Register in the previous year prioritized on a first-come, first- serve basis, and vessels which were previously listed on the Register as active in a given year but have been determined to have made a frivolous request. Requests for active status are considered ``frivolous'' if, for a vessel categorized as active in a given calendar year, less than 20 percent of the vessel's [[Page 13468]] total landings, by weight, in that same year is comprised of tuna harvested by purse seine in the Convention Area, or the vessel did not fish for tuna at all in the Convention Area in that same year. Some exceptions to this apply. The frivolous request provisions apply only to large purse seine vessels. These provisions are intended to prevent large purse seine vessel owners who do not have intent to fish in the Convention Area from requesting listing on the Register and occupying assigned capacity that may otherwise be utilized by active fishing vessels. Small purse seine vessels are not subject to the frivolous request provisions because owners of small vessels tend to have difficulty anticipating whether unassociated schools of tuna will migrate within the range of the vessels off the U.S. West Coast during the summer months in the upcoming year. Frivolous requests criteria may need to be reexamined to ensure full utilization of the U.S. capacity limit. Additionally, there is no time limit for how long a vessel may remain on the Register as inactive, provided the vessel owner or managing owner requests this status every year and pays the associated vessel assessment. Since 2015, a single large purse seine vessel has been on the Register as inactive, occupying 1,523 m\3\ of capacity that would otherwise be available for actively fishing vessels. NMFS seeks input on whether to restrict the current practice that allows vessels to be continually listed as inactive, to improve the utilization of the U.S. purse seine capacity limit by vessels that will actually fish. Lastly, NMFS intends to issue a technical correction to existing U.S. regulations to correct the regulatory carrying capacity to match that on record with the IATTC. A vessel which historically fished in the EPO prior to 2002, and whose carrying capacity was used in the initial capacity calculations for allotment to the United States, had its blueprints re-examined by the IATTC and was found to have had an additional 91 m\3\ of carrying capacity than what was used in the initial calculation. The IATTC recognized that this re-examination increased the United States' historical capacity, and revised their accounting of U.S. capacity to reflect this. NMFS would, therefore, correct the capacity of 31,775 m\3\ cited in our domestic regulations to reflect the IATTC's updated accounting that the U.S. capacity allotment is 31,866 m\3\. For additional information on current regulations pertaining to the Register and procedures for purse seine vessels to be authorized to fish for tuna and tuna-like species in the EPO, please see the compliance guide located at http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/fisheries/migratory_species/iattc-rvr-compliance-guide.pdf and the NMFS website http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/migratory_species/regional_vessel_register.html. Request for Comment NMFS is soliciting comments from the public to help determine what, if any, regulatory amendments could make management of U.S. tuna purse seine vessels on the IATTC Regional Vessel Register more effective. Comments may include suggestions to improve the procedure for making requests to add vessels to the Register, for the identification of ``frivolous requests for active status'' and management of such requests, or how the hierarchy of prioritization of requests should be structured to allow for capacity to be utilized to the full extent possible in the most effective way. NMFS will fully consider all relevant information and comments received, and if necessary, issue proposed regulatory amendments for further consideration. Authority: Tuna Conventions Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: March 26, 2018. Alan D. Risenhoover, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2018-06373 Filed 3-28-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
![13466 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
testing, and integration of automated 8. Do HMR requirements that relate to amending regulations governing the
technologies for surface modes (i.e., the operation of surface automated utilization of purse seine vessel capacity
highway and rail) on both the HMR and vehicles carrying hazardous materials limits associated with the Regional
the general transport of hazardous present different challenges than those Vessel Register of the Inter-American
materials. that relate to ancillary tasks, such as Tropical Tuna Commission. This
Specifically, PHMSA asks: inspections and packaging advance notice of proposed rulemaking
1. What are the safety, regulatory, and requirements? (ANPR) is intended to provide notice to
policy implications of the design, 9. How will the behavioral responses the public of our planning efforts and
testing, and integration of surface of road and railway users change with request comment that will assist in
automated vehicles on the requirements the integration of surface automated identifying revised administrative
in the HMR? Please include any vehicle technologies? What will the processes to improve the efficient
potential solutions PHMSA should reaction be to automated vehicles or rail utilization and management of capacity
consider. cars with markings denoting the limits. This information will help
2. What are potential regulatory presence of hazardous materials? inform our evaluation of what, if any,
incompatibilities between the HMR and 10. What solutions could PHMSA regulatory amendments are necessary
a future surface transportation system consider to address potential future and advisable.
that incorporates automated vehicles? regulatory incompatibilities between the DATES: Comments must be submitted in
Specific HMR areas could include but HMR and surface automated vehicle writing by April 30, 2018.
are not limited to: technologies? ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
(a) Emergency response information and 11. What should PHMSA consider on this document, identified by NOAA-
hazard communication when reviewing applications for special
(b) Packaging and handling NMFS-2018-0030, by any of the
permits seeking regulatory flexibility to following methods:
requirements, including pre- allow for the transport of hazardous
transportation functions • Electronic Submission: Submit all
materials using automated technologies electronic public comments via the
(c) Incident response and reporting for surface modes?
(d) Safety and security plans (e.g., en Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
12. When considering long-term www.regulations.gov/
route security) solutions to challenges the HMR may
(e) Modal requirements (e.g., highway #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-
present to the development, testing, and 0030, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
and rail) integration of surface automated
3. Are there specific HMR complete the required fields, and enter
vehicles, what information and other or attach your comments.
requirements that would need factors should PHMSA consider?
modifications to become performance- • Mail: Attn: Heidi Taylor, Highly
13. What should PHMSA consider Migratory Species Branch Chief, NMFS
based standards that can accommodate when developing future policy,
an automated vehicle operating in a West Coast Region, 501 W Ocean Blvd.,
guidance, and regulations for the safe Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
surface transportation system? transportation of hazardous materials in
4. What automated surface Include the identifier ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–
surface transportation systems? 2018–0030’’ in the comments.
transportation technologies are under
development that are expected to be Signed in Washington, DC, on March 23, Instructions: Comments sent by any
relevant to the safe transport of 2018. other method, to any other address or
hazardous materials, and how might Drue Pearce, individual, or received after the end of
they be used in a surface transportation Deputy Administrator, Pipeline and the comment period, may not be
system? Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. considered by NMFS. All comments
5. Under what circumstances do [FR Doc. 2018–06290 Filed 3–28–18; 8:45 am] received are a part of the public record
freight operators envision the BILLING CODE 4910–60–P and will generally be posted for public
transportation of hazardous materials in viewing on www.regulations.gov
commerce using surface automated without change. All personal identifying
vehicles within the next 10 years? DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
(a) To what extent do the HMR restrict confidential business information, or
the use of surface automated vehicles National Oceanic and Atmospheric otherwise sensitive information
in the transportation of hazardous Administration submitted voluntarily by the sender will
materials in non-bulk packaging in be publicly accessible. NMFS will
parcel delivery and less-than- 50 CFR Part 300 accept anonymous comments (enter
truckload freight shipments by ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
[Docket No. 171227999–8273–01]
commercial motor vehicles? to remain anonymous).
(b) To what extent do the HMR restrict RIN 0648–BH48 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
the use of surface automated vehicles Daniel Studt, NMFS West Coast Region,
in the transportation of hazardous Tuna Conventions Act; Advance 562–980–4073.
materials in bulk packaging by rail Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and commercial motor vehicles? Amendments to Procedures for the
Active and Inactive Vessel Register Background on the IATTC
6. What issues do automated
technologies raise in hazardous AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries The United States is a member of the
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
materials surface transportation that are Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Inter-American Tropical Tuna
not present for human drivers or Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commission (IATTC), which was
operators that PHMSA should address? Commerce. established under the 1949 Convention
7. How might potential changes to the ACTION: Advance notice of proposed for the Establishment of an Inter-
HMR for integration of surface rulemaking; request for comment. American Tropical Tuna Commission.
automated vehicle technologies impact In 2003, the IATTC adopted the
current requirements for human drivers SUMMARY: The National Marine Convention for the Strengthening of the
or operators (i.e., training)? Fisheries Service (NMFS) is considering IATTC Established by the 1949
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:13 Mar 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13527/page/1.svg)
![13468 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
total landings, by weight, in that same input on whether to restrict the current and the NMFS website http://
year is comprised of tuna harvested by practice that allows vessels to be www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
purse seine in the Convention Area, or continually listed as inactive, to fisheries/migratory_species/regional_
the vessel did not fish for tuna at all in improve the utilization of the U.S. purse vessel_register.html.
the Convention Area in that same year. seine capacity limit by vessels that will
Some exceptions to this apply. actually fish. Request for Comment
The frivolous request provisions Lastly, NMFS intends to issue a
NMFS is soliciting comments from
apply only to large purse seine vessels. technical correction to existing U.S.
the public to help determine what, if
These provisions are intended to regulations to correct the regulatory
any, regulatory amendments could make
prevent large purse seine vessel owners carrying capacity to match that on
management of U.S. tuna purse seine
who do not have intent to fish in the record with the IATTC. A vessel which
vessels on the IATTC Regional Vessel
Convention Area from requesting listing historically fished in the EPO prior to
on the Register and occupying assigned 2002, and whose carrying capacity was Register more effective. Comments may
capacity that may otherwise be utilized used in the initial capacity calculations include suggestions to improve the
by active fishing vessels. Small purse for allotment to the United States, had procedure for making requests to add
seine vessels are not subject to the its blueprints re-examined by the IATTC vessels to the Register, for the
frivolous request provisions because and was found to have had an identification of ‘‘frivolous requests for
owners of small vessels tend to have additional 91 m3 of carrying capacity active status’’ and management of such
difficulty anticipating whether than what was used in the initial requests, or how the hierarchy of
unassociated schools of tuna will calculation. The IATTC recognized that prioritization of requests should be
migrate within the range of the vessels this re-examination increased the structured to allow for capacity to be
off the U.S. West Coast during the United States’ historical capacity, and utilized to the full extent possible in the
summer months in the upcoming year. revised their accounting of U.S. capacity most effective way. NMFS will fully
Frivolous requests criteria may need to to reflect this. NMFS would, therefore, consider all relevant information and
be reexamined to ensure full utilization correct the capacity of 31,775 m3 cited comments received, and if necessary,
of the U.S. capacity limit. in our domestic regulations to reflect the issue proposed regulatory amendments
Additionally, there is no time limit for IATTC’s updated accounting that the for further consideration.
how long a vessel may remain on the U.S. capacity allotment is 31,866 m3. Authority: Tuna Conventions Act of 1973,
Register as inactive, provided the vessel For additional information on current as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
owner or managing owner requests this regulations pertaining to the Register
Dated: March 26, 2018.
status every year and pays the and procedures for purse seine vessels
associated vessel assessment. Since to be authorized to fish for tuna and Alan D. Risenhoover,
2015, a single large purse seine vessel tuna-like species in the EPO, please see Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
has been on the Register as inactive, the compliance guide located at http:// Regulatory Programs, National Marine
occupying 1,523 m3 of capacity that www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/ Fisheries Service.
would otherwise be available for publications/fisheries/migratory_ [FR Doc. 2018–06373 Filed 3–28–18; 8:45 am]
actively fishing vessels. NMFS seeks species/iattc-rvr-compliance-guide.pdf BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:13 Mar 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13527/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-29 00:24:52
Document Modified: 2018-03-29 00:24:52
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment. | |
| Dates | Comments must be submitted in writing by April 30, 2018. | |
| Contact | Daniel Studt, NMFS West Coast Region, 562-980-4073. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 13466 | |
| RIN Number | 0648-BH48 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR