83 FR 13542 - Joint Industry Plan; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of the Forty-Second Amendment to the Joint Self-Regulatory Organization Plan Governing the Collection, Consolidation and Dissemination of Quotation and Transaction Information for Nasdaq-Listed Securities Traded on Exchanges on an Unlisted Trading Privileges Basis

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 61 (March 29, 2018)

Page Range		13542-13544
FR Document		2018-06267
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13542-13544]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82938; File No. S7-24-89]


Joint Industry Plan; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness 
of the Forty-Second Amendment to the Joint Self-Regulatory Organization 
Plan Governing the Collection, Consolidation and Dissemination of 
Quotation and Transaction Information for Nasdaq-Listed Securities 
Traded on Exchanges on an Unlisted Trading Privileges Basis

March 23, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 608 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on March 5, 2018, the Participants \3\ in the Joint Self-Regulatory 
Organization Plan Governing the Collection, Consolidation and 
Dissemination of Quotation and Transaction Information for Nasdaq-
Listed Securities Traded on Exchanges on an Unlisted Trading Privileges 
Basis (``NASDAQ/UTP Plan'' or ``Plan'') filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposal to amend the NASDAQ/UTP 
Plan.\4\ The amendment is the 42nd amendment to the NASDAQ/UTP Plan 
(``Amendment'').\5\ The Amendment proposes to amend the text of the fee 
schedule of the Plan to adopt changes to the Nonprofessional Subscriber 
Enterprise Cap and Per Query Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
    \2\ 17 CFR 242.608.
    \3\ The Participants are: Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Cboe BZX 
Exchange, Inc.; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; 
Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Financial 
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Investors Exchange LLC; Nasdaq 
BX, Inc.; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; The Nasdaq Stock Market 
LLC; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE Arca, Inc.; NYSE American 
LLC; and NYSE National, Inc. (collectively, the ``Participants'').
    \4\ The Plan governs the collection, processing, and 
dissemination on a consolidated basis of quotation information and 
transaction reports in Eligible Securities for its Participants. 
This consolidated information informs investors of the current 
quotation and recent trade prices of Nasdaq securities. It enables 
investors to ascertain from one data source the current prices in 
all the markets trading Nasdaq securities. The Plan serves as the 
required transaction reporting plan for its Participants, which is a 
prerequisite for their trading Eligible Securities. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 55647 (April 19, 2007), 72 FR 20891 (April 
26, 2007).
    \5\ See Letter from Emily Kasparov to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Commission, dated March 1, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Participants are proposing to increase the Nonprofessional 
Subscriber Enterprise Cap (``Enterprise Cap'') from $648,000 to 
$1,260,000. The Participants state that the Enterprise Cap was 
established to provide incentives to entities to make market data 
available to large Nonprofessional Subscriber bases. Due to what they 
describe as ongoing industry consolidation, however, the Participants 
are proposing to increase the Enterprise Cap in order to account for 
the sudden and substantial increase of Nonprofessional Subscribers at 
entities using the Enterprise Cap.
    To make the increase of the Enterprise Cap revenue neutral (from an 
overall Plan perspective) and fee neutral (from an individual entity 
\6\ perspective), the Participants are proposing to decrease the Per 
Query Fees for those broker-dealers with 500,000 or more 
Nonprofessional Subscribers. According to the Participants, the 
increase in fees as a result of the increase of the Enterprise Cap will 
be offset by a decrease in Per Query Fees for those entities that would 
most likely be affected by the raising of the cap, i.e., those with a 
large Nonprofessional Subscriber base.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ As described below, the Plan does not require an entity that 
is registered as a broker-dealer under the Act to pay more than the 
Enterprise Cap for any month for each entitlement system offering 
UTP Level 1 Service to Nonprofessional Subscribers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Rule 608(b)(3)(i) under Regulation NMS,\7\ the 
Participants designate the Amendment as establishing or changing a fee 
or other charge collected on behalf of the Participants in connection 
with access to, or use of, any facility contemplated by the Nasdaq/UTP 
Plan. As a result, the Amendment is effective upon filing with the 
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 242.608(b)(3)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments from 
interested persons on the Amendment. Set forth in Sections I and II is 
the statement of the purpose and summary of the Amendment, along with 
the information required by Rules 608(a) and 601(a) under the Act, 
prepared and submitted by the Participants to the Commission.

I. Rule 608(a)

A. Purpose of the Amendment

1. Background
Nonprofessional Subscriber Enterprise Cap
    The Plan requires an entity that is registered as a broker-dealer 
under the Act to pay no more than the Enterprise Cap for any month for 
each entitlement system offering UTP Level 1 Service to Nonprofessional 
Subscribers. The Enterprise Cap equals the aggregate amount of fees 
payable for distribution of UTP Level 1 Service to Nonprofessional 
Subscribers that are brokerage account customers of the broker-dealer. 
The Participants adopted the Enterprise Cap in 2010 and set it at 
$600,000 per month. In 2014, the Participants increased the amount of 
the Enterprise Cap to $624,000.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70953 (Nov. 27, 
2013), 78 FR 72932 (Dec. 4, 2013) (effective Jan. 1, 2014) (``2014 
Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the 2014 Filing, the Participants changed the mechanism for 
increasing the Enterprise Cap. The Enterprise Cap was previously 
increased based on the percentage increase in the annual composite 
share volume for the preceding calendar year, subject to an annual 
maximum increase of five percent. In 2014, the Participants permitted 
such annual increases in the monthly Enterprise Cap as to which they 
agreed by a majority vote, subject to a maximum increase in any 
calendar year of four percent. At that time, the Participants believed 
that this provision permitted an annual increase by a two-thirds vote 
of the Participants without requiring a corresponding rule filing with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Nevertheless, the Participants 
have not increased the Enterprise Cap since this change was adopted in 
2014.\9\ This filing proposes to remove that provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ As described below, the Participants believe that this 
provision should be deleted and that any changes to the Enterprise 
Cap should be submitted to the Commission for review and public 
comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per Query Fee
    As an alternative to monthly Professional Subscriber and 
Nonprofessional Subscriber fees, a vendor may respond to end-user 
queries for quote and trade information and pay a fee for each such 
response. The Participants first established Per Query Fees in 1992 as 
a pilot at $0.015 per query.\10\ In 1995, it was noted that the UTP Per 
Query Fees were three times that of the Network A and Network B 
counterparts. Subsequently, the UTP Per Query Fees was [sic] made a 
permanent part of the fee schedule and was lowered to $0.01 per query 
to be more in line with Networks A and B. In April 1999, a pilot at a 
reduced rate of $.005 per query was filed and in April 2001, it was 
approved as the permanent fee

[[Page 13543]]

structure. In 2014, the Participants increased the fee to $0.0075 per 
query to offset the revenue loss resulting from decreases in the 
Professional Subscriber device fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73279 (Oct. 1, 
2014), 79 FR 60522 (Oct. 7, 2014) (describing the history of the Per 
Query Fees).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Amendment to Enterprise Cap
    The Participants are proposing to increase the Enterprise Cap from 
$624,000 to $1,260,000. As a result of industry consolidation, the 
Nonprofessional Subscriber base for entities subject to the cap may 
suddenly increase, and where before two entities may have slightly 
benefited from the Enterprise Cap, a combined entity could find a 
substantial decrease in fees by using the Enterprise Cap. Consequently, 
the increase of the Enterprise Cap is designed to maintain the status 
quo and should not, in conjunction with the Per Query fee change 
described below, result in an increase of revenue to the Plan or fees 
for any particular entity.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Participants note that a very small number of entities 
take advantage of the Enterprise Cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Participants are proposing to remove a provision 
related to an annual increase of the Enterprise Cap after a two-thirds 
vote of the Participants. In the 2014 Filing, the Participants amended 
the mechanism by which the Enterprise Cap would increase, from an 
automatic increase based on volume to an affirmative vote requirement 
by the Participants. Since 2014, the Enterprise Cap has not been 
increased using this mechanism, and the Participants believe that any 
future changes to the Enterprise Cap should be submitted via a filing 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and subject to public 
comment. Consequently, the Participants are proposing to delete this 
particular provision.
3. Per Query Fee Change to Remain Revenue Neutral
    Because of the increase in the Enterprise Cap, there is a small 
subset of broker-dealers that use the Enterprise Cap that, without a 
corresponding offset, could face an increase in fees. To offset this 
potential fee increase, the Participants are proposing a decrease in 
the Per Query fee for Nonprofessional Subscribers where a broker-dealer 
has 500,000 or more Nonprofessional Subscribers. For such entities, the 
Per Query fee for Non-Professional Subscribers would be decreased from 
$.0075 to $.0025; the Per Query fee for Professional Subscribers would 
remain at the $.0075 rate. By implementing a tiered structure for Per 
Query fees, the proposal is designed to provide an offset to those 
firms most likely affected by the Enterprise Cap increase (i.e., those 
with a large Nonprofessional Subscriber base).
    Additionally, the proposal will align Network C with a similar 
tiered structure being proposed for Network A and Network B.

B. Governing or Constituent Documents

    Not applicable.

C. Implementation of the Amendment

    Pursuant to Rule 608(b)(3)(i) under Regulation NMS, the 
Participants have designated the proposed amendment as establishing or 
changing fees and are submitting the amendment for immediate 
effectiveness.

D. Development and Implementation Phases

    See Item I.C. above.

E. Analysis of Impact on Competition

    The proposed amendments do not impose any burden on competition 
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The proposed increase in the 
Enterprise Cap is designed to account for industry consolidation. 
Without this adjustment, the Plan's revenue will suddenly decrease due 
to a broker-dealer increasing its Nonprofessional Subscriber base 
through a merger with another broker-dealer. As detailed further below, 
while the Enterprise Cap is being increased, the Plan's revenue and 
fees collected from entities will be maintained at their current 
levels. The potential fee increase for broker-dealers taking advantage 
of the Enterprise Cap will be offset by a decrease in the Per Query fee 
for broker-dealers with large Nonprofessional Subscriber bases. This 
offset will ensure that the fee changes proposed herein remain revenue 
neutral.
    The Participants therefore believe that the proposed fee changes 
are carefully calibrated to maintain the status quo and, as a result, 
do not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate.

F. Written Understanding or Agreements Relating to Interpretation of, 
or articipation in, Plan

    Not applicable.

G. Approval by Sponsors in Accordance With Plan

    In accordance with Section IV(C)(2) of the Plan, more than two-
thirds of the Participants have approved the fee change proposed 
herein.

H. Description of Operation of Facility Contemplated by the Proposed 
Amendment

    Not applicable.

I. Terms and Conditions of Access

    Not applicable.

J. Method of Determination and Imposition, and Amount of, Fees and 
Charges

    The Participants are proposing to increase the Enterprise Cap by an 
amount to ensure that industry consolidation would not result in a 
sudden decrease in Plan revenue, thereby avoiding any single entity 
from getting a disproportionate benefit from the Enterprise Cap. The 
Participants propose to decrease the Per Query fee for Nonprofessional 
Subscribers for broker- dealers with a large Nonprofessional Subscriber 
base. The amount of the proposed decrease is specifically tailored to 
ensure that the increase in fees as a result of raising the Enterprise 
Cap would be offset and that the proposed amendment would remain 
revenue neutral.
    Because the Participants have data showing the current benefit of 
the Enterprise Cap and the number of queries of those potentially 
affected by the change in the Enterprise Cap, the Participants were 
able to calibrate the Per Query fee in order to make the changes 
proposed herein revenue neutral. As previously stated, the proposed 
change will not only maintain the status quo on an overall Plan revenue 
basis, but also maintain the status quo with respect to the fees 
charged to individual entities.
    The proposed fee changes were distributed to and discussed with 
members of the Plan's Advisory Committee, and were discussed and voted 
on during the General Session of the Operating Committee in the 
presence of the Advisory Committee.

K. Method and Frequency of Processor Evaluation

    Not applicable.

L. Dispute Resolution

    Not applicable.

II. Rule 601(a)

A. Equity Securities for Which Transaction Reports Shall be Required by 
the Plan

    Not applicable.

B. Reporting Requirements

    Not applicable.

[[Page 13544]]

C. Manner of Collecting, Processing, Sequencing, Making Available and 
Disseminating Last Sale Information

    Not applicable.

D. Manner of Consolidation

    Not applicable.

E. Standards and Methods Ensuring Promptness, Accuracy and Completeness 
of Transaction Reports

    Not applicable.

F. Rules and Procedures Addressed to Fraudulent or Manipulative 
Dissemination

    Not applicable.

G. Terms of Access to Transaction Reports

    Not applicable.

H. Identification of Marketplace of Execution

    Not applicable.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    The Commission seeks comment on the Amendments. In particular, the 
Commission seeks comment on the following: (1) Is the anticipated 
impact on revenue to the Plans consistent with the Participants' 
representations; (2) is the anticipated impact on costs to consumers of 
market data, including broker-dealers and their non-professional 
customers, consistent with the Participants' representations; (3) is 
there supporting data to illustrate that the proposed changes are 
``revenue neutral'' as asserted by the Participants; (4) could the fee 
changes have a disproportionate impact on particular data recipients; 
(5) what, if any, supporting data could inform whether the changes 
would maintain the status quo and therefore do not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate as asserted by the 
Participants; and (6) whether the impact of potential industry 
consolidation on the revenue of the Plans is consistent with the 
representations of the Participants? Interested persons are invited to 
submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, 
including whether the proposed Amendment is consistent with the Act. 
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number S7-24-89 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number File No. S7-24-89. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies 
of the submission, all written statements with respect to the proposed 
Amendment that are filed with the Commission, and all written 
communications relating to the proposed Amendment between the 
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from 
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room on official business days between the hours of 10:00 
a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the Amendment also will be available for 
website viewing and printing at the principal office of the Plan. All 
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting 
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal 
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number S7-24-89 and should be 
submitted on or before April 19, 2018.

    By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-06267 Filed 3-28-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Notices 13543

structure. In 2014, the Participants Enterprise Cap increase (i.e., those with H. Description of Operation of Facility
increased the fee to $0.0075 per query a large Nonprofessional Subscriber Contemplated by the Proposed
to offset the revenue loss resulting from base). Amendment
decreases in the Professional Subscriber Additionally, the proposal will align
device fee. Not applicable.
Network C with a similar tiered
2. Amendment to Enterprise Cap structure being proposed for Network A I. Terms and Conditions of Access
and Network B.
The Participants are proposing to Not applicable.
increase the Enterprise Cap from B. Governing or Constituent Documents
J. Method of Determination and
$624,000 to $1,260,000. As a result of
Not applicable. Imposition, and Amount of, Fees and
industry consolidation, the
Charges
Nonprofessional Subscriber base for C. Implementation of the Amendment
entities subject to the cap may suddenly The Participants are proposing to
increase, and where before two entities Pursuant to Rule 608(b)(3)(i) under increase the Enterprise Cap by an
may have slightly benefited from the Regulation NMS, the Participants have amount to ensure that industry
Enterprise Cap, a combined entity could designated the proposed amendment as consolidation would not result in a
find a substantial decrease in fees by establishing or changing fees and are sudden decrease in Plan revenue,
using the Enterprise Cap. Consequently, submitting the amendment for thereby avoiding any single entity from
the increase of the Enterprise Cap is immediate effectiveness. getting a disproportionate benefit from
designed to maintain the status quo and D. Development and Implementation the Enterprise Cap. The Participants
should not, in conjunction with the Per Phases propose to decrease the Per Query fee
Query fee change described below, for Nonprofessional Subscribers for
result in an increase of revenue to the See Item I.C. above. broker- dealers with a large
Plan or fees for any particular entity.11 E. Analysis of Impact on Competition Nonprofessional Subscriber base. The
Additionally, the Participants are amount of the proposed decrease is
proposing to remove a provision related The proposed amendments do not specifically tailored to ensure that the
to an annual increase of the Enterprise impose any burden on competition that increase in fees as a result of raising the
Cap after a two-thirds vote of the is not necessary or appropriate in Enterprise Cap would be offset and that
Participants. In the 2014 Filing, the furtherance of the purposes of the the proposed amendment would remain
Participants amended the mechanism by Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The revenue neutral.
which the Enterprise Cap would proposed increase in the Enterprise Cap Because the Participants have data
increase, from an automatic increase is designed to account for industry showing the current benefit of the
based on volume to an affirmative vote consolidation. Without this adjustment, Enterprise Cap and the number of
requirement by the Participants. Since the Plan’s revenue will suddenly queries of those potentially affected by
2014, the Enterprise Cap has not been decrease due to a broker-dealer the change in the Enterprise Cap, the
increased using this mechanism, and increasing its Nonprofessional Participants were able to calibrate the
the Participants believe that any future Subscriber base through a merger with Per Query fee in order to make the
changes to the Enterprise Cap should be another broker-dealer. As detailed changes proposed herein revenue
submitted via a filing with the further below, while the Enterprise Cap neutral. As previously stated, the
Securities and Exchange Commission is being increased, the Plan’s revenue proposed change will not only maintain
and subject to public comment. and fees collected from entities will be the status quo on an overall Plan
Consequently, the Participants are maintained at their current levels. The revenue basis, but also maintain the
proposing to delete this particular potential fee increase for broker-dealers status quo with respect to the fees
provision. taking advantage of the Enterprise Cap charged to individual entities.
3. Per Query Fee Change to Remain will be offset by a decrease in the Per
The proposed fee changes were
Revenue Neutral Query fee for broker-dealers with large
distributed to and discussed with
Nonprofessional Subscriber bases. This
Because of the increase in the members of the Plan’s Advisory
offset will ensure that the fee changes
Enterprise Cap, there is a small subset Committee, and were discussed and
proposed herein remain revenue
of broker-dealers that use the Enterprise voted on during the General Session of
neutral.
Cap that, without a corresponding the Operating Committee in the
The Participants therefore believe that presence of the Advisory Committee.
offset, could face an increase in fees. To
the proposed fee changes are carefully
offset this potential fee increase, the K. Method and Frequency of Processor
calibrated to maintain the status quo
Participants are proposing a decrease in Evaluation
and, as a result, do not impose any
the Per Query fee for Nonprofessional
burden on competition that is not Not applicable.
Subscribers where a broker-dealer has
necessary or appropriate.
500,000 or more Nonprofessional L. Dispute Resolution
Subscribers. For such entities, the Per F. Written Understanding or Agreements
Query fee for Non-Professional Relating to Interpretation of, or Not applicable.
Subscribers would be decreased from articipation in, Plan
II. Rule 601(a)
$.0075 to $.0025; the Per Query fee for
Not applicable.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

Professional Subscribers would remain A. Equity Securities for Which
at the $.0075 rate. By implementing a G. Approval by Sponsors in Accordance Transaction Reports Shall be Required
tiered structure for Per Query fees, the With Plan by the Plan
proposal is designed to provide an offset
to those firms most likely affected by the In accordance with Section IV(C)(2) of Not applicable.
the Plan, more than two-thirds of the B. Reporting Requirements
11 The Participants note that a very small number Participants have approved the fee
of entities take advantage of the Enterprise Cap. change proposed herein. Not applicable.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Mar 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1
13544 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Notices

C. Manner of Collecting, Processing, Paper Comments ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
Sequencing, Making Available and notice is hereby given that on March 16,
• Send paper comments in triplicate
Disseminating Last Sale Information 2018, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
Not applicable. ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
Securities and Exchange Commission
D. Manner of Consolidation NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
Not applicable. All submissions should refer to File change as described in Items I, II, and
Number File No. S7–24–89. This file III below, which Items have been
E. Standards and Methods Ensuring number should be included on the prepared by the Exchange. The
Promptness, Accuracy and subject line if email is used. To help the Exchange has designated this proposal
Completeness of Transaction Reports Commission process and review your as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ proposed rule
Not applicable. comments more efficiently, please use change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
only one method. The Commission will of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
F. Rules and Procedures Addressed to post all comments on the Commission’s thereunder,4 which renders it effective
Fraudulent or Manipulative website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/ upon filing with the Commission. The
Dissemination sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all Commission is publishing this notice to
Not applicable. written statements with respect to the solicit comments on the proposed rule
proposed Amendment that are filed change from interested persons.
G. Terms of Access to Transaction with the Commission, and all written
Reports communications relating to the I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Not applicable. proposed Amendment between the Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Commission and any person, other than the Proposed Rule Change
H. Identification of Marketplace of
Execution those that may be withheld from the The Exchange filed a proposal to
public in accordance with the amend paragraph (h) of Exchange Rule
Not applicable. provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 11.6 describing the operation of orders
III. Solicitation of Comments available for website viewing and with a Minimum Execution Quantity 5
printing in the Commission’s Public instruction.
The Commission seeks comment on Reference Room on official business The text of the proposed rule change
the Amendments. In particular, the days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. is available at the Exchange’s website at
Commission seeks comment on the and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the Amendment www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal
following: (1) Is the anticipated impact also will be available for website office of the Exchange, and at the
on revenue to the Plans consistent with viewing and printing at the principal Commission’s Public Reference Room.
the Participants’ representations; (2) is office of the Plan. All comments
the anticipated impact on costs to received will be posted without change. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
consumers of market data, including Persons submitting comments are Statement of the Purpose of, and
broker-dealers and their non- cautioned that we do not redact or edit Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
professional customers, consistent with personal identifying information from Change
the Participants’ representations; (3) is comment submissions. You should In its filing with the Commission, the
there supporting data to illustrate that submit only information that you wish Exchange included statements
the proposed changes are ‘‘revenue to make available publicly. All concerning the purpose of and basis for
neutral’’ as asserted by the Participants; submissions should refer to File the proposed rule change and discussed
(4) could the fee changes have a Number S7–24–89 and should be any comments it received on the
disproportionate impact on particular submitted on or before April 19, 2018. proposed rule change. The text of these
data recipients; (5) what, if any, statements may be examined at the
supporting data could inform whether By the Commission.
places specified in Item IV below. The
the changes would maintain the status Brent J. Fields,
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
quo and therefore do not impose any Secretary.
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
burden on competition that is not [FR Doc. 2018–06267 Filed 3–28–18; 8:45 am] the most significant parts of such
necessary or appropriate as asserted by BILLING CODE 8011–01–P statements.
the Participants; and (6) whether the
impact of potential industry A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
consolidation on the revenue of the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Statement of the Purpose of, and
Plans is consistent with the COMMISSION Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
representations of the Participants? Change
Interested persons are invited to submit [Release No. 34–82944; File No. SR– 1. Purpose
written data, views, and arguments CboeEDGA–2018–005]
concerning the foregoing, including The Exchange proposes to amend
whether the proposed Amendment is Self-Regulatory Organizations; paragraph (h) of Exchange Rule 11.6
consistent with the Act. Comments may CboeEDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of describing the operation of orders with
be submitted by any of the following Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Minimum Execution Quantity
methods: a Proposed Rule Change To Amend instruction by removing language that
provided for the re-pricing of incoming
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

Paragraph (h) of Exchange Rule 11.6
Electronic Comments Describing the Operation of Orders
• Use the Commission’s internet With a Minimum Execution Quantity 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Instruction 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
rules/sro.shtml); or 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
• Send an email to rule-comments@ March 23, 2018.
5 See Exchange Rule 11.6(h) for a complete
sec.gov. Please include File Number S7– Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the description of the operation of the Minimum
24–89 on the subject line. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Execution Quantity order instruction.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Mar 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1
Document Created: 2018-03-29 00:26:12
Document Modified: 2018-03-29 00:26:12
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		83 FR 13542