83 FR 17506 - Almonds Grown in California; Adjusted Kernel Weight Computation
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 77 (April 20, 2018)
Agricultural Marketing Service
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 77 (April 20, 2018)
| Page Range | 17506-17509 | |
| FR Document | 2018-08249 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 17506-17509] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-08249] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 981 [Doc. No. AMS-SC-17-0084; SC18-981-1 PR] Almonds Grown in California; Adjusted Kernel Weight Computation AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation from the Almond Board of California (Board) to [[Page 17507]] revise the adjusted kernel weight computation currently prescribed under the Marketing Order for almonds grown in California. In addition, this action would allow adjustments to the calculated percentages for foreign material, excess moisture, or inedible kernels so that the sum of the percentages for the specified measurements would equal 100 percent. DATES: Comments must be received by May 21, 2018. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250- 0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or internet: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this proposal will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at the address provided above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist, or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email: Andrea.Ricci@ams.usda.gov or Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of almonds grown in California. Part 981 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Board locally administers the Order and is comprised of growers and handlers operating within California. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the definition of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017). This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This proposed rule invites comments on revisions to the adjusted kernel weight computation currently prescribed for almonds under the Order. This proposal would change the way adjusted kernel weight is expressed by requiring calculation of percentages for specified measurements to round the decimal to the nearest thousandth rather than the current hundredth. In addition, this proposed rule would allow adjustments to the calculated percentages for foreign material, excess moisture, or inedible kernels so that the sum of the percentages for the specified measurements would equal 100 percent. The Board unanimously recommended these changes at its December 4, 2017, meeting. Section 981.42 provides authority for quality control regulations. Paragraph (a) of that section requires that each handler shall have the inspection agency determine the percentage of inedible kernels received by that handler and report such determination to the Board. Section 981.442(a)(1) prescribes that each handler shall have a representative sample drawn from each lot of any variety of incoming almonds that the handler receives. Section 981.442(a)(3) prescribes that each such sample shall be analyzed by or under surveillance of the Federal-State Inspection Service (or, when specifically designated, the Federal Inspection Service) to determine the kernel content and the portion of inedible kernels in the sample. The inspection agency prepares a report showing, among other things, the total adjusted kernel weight. This report is submitted by the inspection agency to the Board and the handler. Section 981.401(a) defines adjusted kernel weight. Section 981.401(b) provides examples of the computation that is used to determine adjusted kernel weight. This computation includes a calculation of percentages for specified measurements of edible kernels, inedible kernels, foreign material, and excess moisture. The table of examples contained in Sec. 981.401(b) shows percentages rounded to the nearest tenth and the nearest hundredth decimal place. However, in practice, the calculated percentages are currently being rounded to the nearest hundredth decimal place. Currently, the inspection agency utilizes a computer-based database program that computes and totals the percentages for the specified measurements. As part of the program's computation process, it automatically makes adjustments, when needed, so that the total of the percentages equals 100 percent. This program has been used for several years, and the industry is accustomed to receiving reports from the inspection agency that show the 100-percent summed total. In early 2017, the USDA inspection service began testing a new web- based program that will replace the computer-based program described above. During this testing, USDA discovered that, due to the rounding method used by the new program, the sum of the percentages occasionally did not equal 100 percent. It was further determined during testing that having the new program round the decimal to the nearest thousandth, rather than the nearest hundredth as currently provided in the Order, would produce more accurate results. [[Page 17508]] The new program could also make automatic minor adjustments to the percentage computations for foreign material, excess moisture, or inedible kernels so that the sum of the percentages would always equal 100 percent. This allowance for automatic adjustments of these specified measurements aligns with industry practice that has existed for many years. As a result of these test results, the Board determined that rounding the decimal to the nearest thousandth rather than the current hundredth would provide a more accurate computed percentage. In addition, allowing the program to make adjustments to the calculated percentages for foreign material, excess moisture, or inedible kernels would align the requirements under the Order with current industry practices, ensuring the continuance of longstanding reporting practices and transparency in the program. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. There are approximately 6,800 almond growers in the production area and approximately 100 almond handlers subject to regulation under the Order. Small agricultural service firms are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,500,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201). The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reported in its most recent (2012) Agricultural Census that there were 6,841 almond farms in the production area (California), of which 6,204 had bearing acres. The following computation provides an estimate of the proportion of agricultural producers (farms) and agricultural service firms (handlers) that would be considered small under the SBA definitions. The NASS Census data indicates that out of the 6,204 California farms with bearing acres of almonds, 4,471 (72 percent) have fewer than 100 bearing acres. For the almond industry's most recently reported crop year (2016), NASS reported an average yield of 2,280 pounds per acre and a season average grower price of $2.44 per pound. A 100-acre farm with an average yield of 2,280 pounds per acre would produce about 228,000 pounds of almonds. At $2.44 per pound, that farm's production would be valued at $556,320. The Census of Agriculture indicates that the majority of California's almond farms are smaller than 100 acres; therefore, it could be concluded that the majority of growers had annual receipts from the sale of almonds in 2016-17 of less than $556,320, which is below the SBA threshold of $750,000. Thus, over 70 percent of California's almond growers would be classified as small growers according to SBA's definition. To estimate the proportion of almond handlers that would be considered small businesses, it was assumed that the unit value per shelled pound of almonds exported in a particular year could serve as a representative almond price at the handler level. A unit value for a commodity is the value of exports divided by the quantity. Data from the Global Agricultural Trade System database of USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service showed that the value of almond exports from August 2016 to July 2017 (combining shelled and inshell almonds) was $4.072 billion. The quantity of almond exports over that time period was 1.406 billion pounds, combining shelled exports and the shelled equivalent of inshell exports. Dividing the export value by the quantity yields a unit value of $2.90 per pound. Subtracting this figure from the NASS 2016 estimate of season average grower price per pound ($2.44) yields $0.46 per pound as a representative grower-handler margin. Applying the $2.90 representative handler price per pound to 2016-17 handler shipment quantities provided by the Board showed that approximately 40 percent of California's almond handlers shipped almonds valued under $7,500,000 during the 2016-17 crop year and would therefore be considered small handlers according to the SBA definition. This proposed rule would revise the adjusted kernel weight computation in Sec. 981.401 by requiring calculation of the percentages for specified measurements to round the decimal to the nearest thousandth rather than the current hundredth. In addition, this action would allow adjustments to the calculated percentages for foreign material, excess moisture, or inedible kernels so that the sum of the percentages for the specified measurements would equal 100 percent. Requiring rounding of the decimal to the nearest thousandth would provide for a more accurate computed percentage. In addition, allowing adjustments to the foreign material, excess moisture, or inedible kernel measurements would align the Order with current industry practices, ensuring the continuance of longstanding reporting practices and transparency in the program. Authority for this action is provided in Sec. 981.42(a) of the Order. The Board recommended this action at a meeting on December 4, 2017. It is not anticipated that this action would impose additional costs on handlers or growers, regardless of size. The proposed changes are intended to align provisions of the Order with current industry practices. This proposed rule is not expected to change handler inspection costs, as handlers are currently required to have all lots inspected to determine kernel content. The Board considered alternatives to this action, including not changing the current computation procedures. Prior to this recommendation, the Board's Almond Quality, Food Safety and Services Committee (Committee) reviewed the program, surveyed handlers, and determined that not changing the computation procedures to align with current industry practices would cause disruption in the industry. Therefore, the Committee unanimously recommended this action to the Board at a meeting on November 16, 2017. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 (Vegetable and Specialty Crops). No changes are necessary in those requirements as a result of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. This proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large almond handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen [[Page 17509]] access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule. Further, the Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the almond industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Board deliberations. Like all Board meetings, the December 4, 2017, meeting was a public meeting, and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on this issue. Also, the Board has a number of appointed committees to review certain issues and make recommendations to the Board. The Committee met on November 16, 2017, and discussed this issue in detail. That meeting was also a public meeting, and both large and small entities were able to participate and express their views. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and information collection impacts of this action on small businesses. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be considered before a final determination is made on this matter. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981 Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA 0 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674. 0 2. In Sec. 981.401, revise the table in paragraph (b) and add paragraph (c) to read as follows: Sec. 981.401 Adjusted kernel weight. * * * * * (b) * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Computation No. 1 Computation No. 2 --------------------------------------------------------------- Deliveries with less than 95 Deliveries with 95 percent or percent kernels more kernels --------------------------------------------------------------- Percent of Weight Percent of Weight sample (pounds) sample (pounds) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Actual gross weight of delivery.............. .............. 10,000 .............. 10,000 2. Percent of edible kernel weight.............. 53.000 .............. 84.000 .............. 3. Less weight loss in processing \1\........... 1.000 .............. 0.000 .............. 4. Less excess moisture of edible kernels 1.060 .............. 1.680 .............. (excess moisture x line 2)..................... 5. Net percent shell out (line 2 - lines 3 and 50.940 .............. 82.320 .............. 4)............................................. 6. Net edible kernels (line 5 x line 1)......... .............. 5,094 .............. 8,232 7. Percent of inedible kernels (from sample).... 12.000 .............. 12.000 .............. 8. Less excess moisture of inedible kernels 0.240 .............. 0.240 .............. (excess moisture from sample x line 7)......... 9. Net percent inedible kernels (line 7 - line 11.760 .............. 11.760 .............. 8)............................................. 10. Total inedible kernels (line 9 x line 1).... .............. 1,176 .............. 1,176 11. Adjusted kernel weight (line 6 + line 10)... .............. 6,270 .............. 9,408 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Only applies to deliveries with less than 95 percent kernels. (c) Computation Adjustments. If applicable, adjustments shall be made by rounding such that the sample computation percentages total equals 100 percent. Rounding adjustments shall be made as follows: First adjust the foreign material percentage; if there is no foreign material in the sample, then adjust the excess moisture percentage; or if there is no foreign material or excess moisture in the sample, adjust the inedible kernels percentage. Dated: April 16, 2018. Bruce Summers, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2018-08249 Filed 4-19-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
![17506 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the location and hours of the reading (2) The production site where the fruit bait spray agreed upon by APHIS and
room are provided under the heading is grown must be registered with the the NPPO of Ecuador must be initiated
ADDRESSES at the beginning of this NPPO of Ecuador. in the detection area. Treatment must
proposed rule.) Copies can also be (3) Harvested fresh cape gooseberry continue for at least 2 months. Sites
obtained from Ms. Kimberly Hardy, fruit must be placed in field cartons or whose exports have been canceled
APHIS’ Information Collection containers that are marked to show the under this paragraph will be eligible to
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2483. APHIS official identification of the production export fruit to the United States only if
will respond to any ICR-related site. the fruit is treated in accordance with
comments in the final rule. All (4) All openings to the outside of the paragraph (e) of this section. Exports
comments will also become a matter of packinghouse where the fruit is packed may resume from the detection area in
public record. must be covered by screening or by accordance with this paragraph (d)
some other barrier that prevents pests when APHIS and the NPPO of Ecuador
E-Government Act Compliance from entering. The packinghouse must agree the risk has been mitigated.
The Animal and Plant Health have double doors at the entrance to the (3) Phytosanitary inspection. After
Inspection Service is committed to facility and at the interior entrance to packing, the NPPO of Ecuador must
compliance with the EGovernment Act the area where the fresh cape gooseberry visually inspect the fresh cape
to promote the use of the internet and fruit is packed. gooseberry fruit at a rate jointly
other information technologies, to (5) Each consignment of fresh cape approved by APHIS and the NPPO of
provide increased opportunities for gooseberry fruit must be accompanied Ecuador. Any fruit displaying evidence
citizen access to Government by a phytosanitary certificate issued by of pest presence must be cut open for
information and services, and for other the NPPO of Ecuador that contains an further examination. Only in the case
purposes. For information pertinent to additional declaration stating that the where at least one single live C. capitata
E-Government Act compliance related fruit in the consignment was produced is found, the consignment will not pass
to this proposed rule, please contact Ms. in accordance with § 319.56–83. inspection. Any consignment that does
Kimberly Hardy, APHIS’ Information (b) Commercial consignments. The not pass inspection may still be
Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851– fresh cape gooseberry fruit may be imported into the continental United
2483. imported in commercial consignments States subject to treatment as provided
only. in paragraph (e) of this section.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319 (c) To be eligible for importation, the (e) Treatment. The fresh cape
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, fresh cape gooseberry fruit must either gooseberry fruit may be imported into
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests, be produced and shipped under the the continental United States without
Quarantine, Reporting and systems approach described in meeting the conditions of paragraph (d)
recordkeeping requirements, Rice, paragraph (d) of this section or treated of this section if the fruit is subject to
Vegetables. in accordance with paragraph (e) of this cold treatment or irradiation treatment
section. in accordance with part 305 of this
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 (d) Systems approach. The fresh cape
CFR part 319 as follows: chapter. If the irradiation treatment is
gooseberry fruit may be imported completed in Ecuador, each
without treatment if it is subject to a consignment of fresh cape gooseberry
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
systems approach consisting of the fruit must be accompanied by
NOTICES
following: documentation to validate foreign site
(1) Low-prevalence production site
■ 1. The authority citation for part 319 preclearance inspection of the
certification. The fruit must originate
continues to read as follows: consignment.
from a registered production site within
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and a low prevalence area for C. capitata Done in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR that has been certified as such by the April 2018.
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. Kevin Shea,
NPPO of Ecuador.
■ 2. Add § 319.56–83 to read as follows: (2) Fruit fly trapping. (i) Trapping for Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
C. capitata must be conducted in the Inspection Service.
§ 319.56–83 Fresh cape gooseberry from places of production in accordance with [FR Doc. 2018–08251 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am]
Ecuador. the operational workplan to BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
Fresh cape gooseberry (Physalis demonstrate that those places are free of
peruviana) fruit may be imported into C. capitata. Specific trapping
the continental United States only requirements must be included in the DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
under the conditions described in this operational workplan. The NPPO of
section. These conditions are designed Ecuador must keep records of fruit fly Agricultural Marketing Service
to prevent the introduction of Ceratitis detections for each trap and make the
capitata. 7 CFR Part 981
records available to APHIS upon
(a) General requirements. (1) The request. [Doc. No. AMS–SC–17–0084; SC18–981–1
national plant protection organization (ii) All fruit flies trapped must be PR]
(NPPO) of Ecuador must provide an reported to APHIS immediately. Capture
operational workplan to APHIS that of C. capitata will result in immediate Almonds Grown in California; Adjusted
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
details the activities that the NPPO of cancellation of exports from farms Kernel Weight Computation
Ecuador will, subject to APHIS’ within 5 kilometer radius of the AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
approval of the workplan, carry out to detection site. An additional 50 traps USDA.
meet the requirements of this section. must be placed in the 5 square kilometer ACTION: Proposed rule.
APHIS will be directly involved with area surrounding the detection site. If a
the NPPO of Ecuador in monitoring and second detection is made within the SUMMARY:This proposed rule would
auditing implementation of the systems detection areas within 30 days of a implement a recommendation from the
approach. previous capture, eradication using a Almond Board of California (Board) to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Apr 19, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20APP1.SGM 20APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_17583/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Proposed Rules 17509
access to Government information and small entities were able to participate List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
services, and for other purposes. and express their views.
Finally, interested persons are invited Almonds, Marketing agreements,
USDA has not identified any relevant Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or to submit comments on this proposed
rule, including the regulatory and requirements.
conflict with this proposed rule.
information collection impacts of this For the reasons set forth in the
Further, the Board’s meeting was action on small businesses. preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is proposed to
widely publicized throughout the A small business guide on complying be amended as follows:
almond industry, and all interested with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
persons were invited to attend the marketing agreements and orders may PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
meeting and participate in Board be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ CALIFORNIA
deliberations. Like all Board meetings, rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
the December 4, 2017, meeting was a Any questions about the compliance ■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
public meeting, and all entities, both guide should be sent to Richard Lower part 981 continues to read as follows:
large and small, were able to express at the previously mentioned address in
their views on this issue. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Also, the Board has a number of section. ■ 2. In § 981.401, revise the table in
appointed committees to review certain A 30-day comment period is provided paragraph (b) and add paragraph (c) to
issues and make recommendations to to allow interested persons to respond read as follows:
the Board. The Committee met on to this proposal. All written comments
November 16, 2017, and discussed this timely received will be considered § 981.401 Adjusted kernel weight.
issue in detail. That meeting was also a before a final determination is made on * * * * *
public meeting, and both large and this matter. (b) * * *
Computation No. 1 Computation No. 2
Deliveries with less than Deliveries with 95 percent or
95 percent kernels more kernels
Percent Weight Percent Weight
of sample (pounds) of sample (pounds)
1. Actual gross weight of delivery .................................................................... ........................ 10,000 ........................ 10,000
2. Percent of edible kernel weight ................................................................... 53.000 ........................ 84.000 ........................
3. Less weight loss in processing 1 ................................................................. 1.000 ........................ 0.000 ........................
4. Less excess moisture of edible kernels (excess moisture × line 2) ........... 1.060 ........................ 1.680 ........................
5. Net percent shell out (line 2 ¥ lines 3 and 4) ............................................ 50.940 ........................ 82.320 ........................
6. Net edible kernels (line 5 × line 1) .............................................................. ........................ 5,094 ........................ 8,232
7. Percent of inedible kernels (from sample) .................................................. 12.000 ........................ 12.000 ........................
8. Less excess moisture of inedible kernels (excess moisture from sample ×
line 7) ........................................................................................................... 0.240 ........................ 0.240 ........................
9. Net percent inedible kernels (line 7 ¥ line 8) ............................................. 11.760 ........................ 11.760 ........................
10. Total inedible kernels (line 9 × line 1) ....................................................... ........................ 1,176 ........................ 1,176
11. Adjusted kernel weight (line 6 + line 10) ................................................... ........................ 6,270 ........................ 9,408
1 Only applies to deliveries with less than 95 percent kernels.
(c) Computation Adjustments. If FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION errors in the ADDRESSES and
applicable, adjustments shall be made SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION captions.
by rounding such that the sample 11 CFR Chapter 113 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
computation percentages total equals Robert M. Knop, Assistant General
[Notice 2018–07]
100 percent. Rounding adjustments Counsel, 1050 First Street NE,
shall be made as follows: First adjust the Rulemaking Petition: Former Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694–1650
foreign material percentage; if there is Candidates’ Personal Use; Correction or (800) 424–9530.
no foreign material in the sample, then CORRECTION: In the Federal Register of
adjust the excess moisture percentage; AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
March 21, 2018, 83 FR 12283, in the
or if there is no foreign material or ACTION: Rulemaking Petition; ADDRESSES caption, in the first column,
excess moisture in the sample, adjust Notification of Availability; Correction. correct the first paragraph to read:
the inedible kernels percentage.
SUMMARY: The Federal Election ADDRESSES: All comments must be in
Dated: April 16, 2018. Commission published a Notification of writing. Commenters are encouraged to
Bruce Summers, Availability in the Federal Register on submit comments electronically via the
March 21, 2018 regarding a Petition for Commission’s website at http://
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service. Rulemaking it received on February 5, sers.fec.gov/fosers/rulemaking.htm?pid=
[FR Doc. 2018–08249 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am] 2018. The petition asked the 2883684, which references REG 2018–
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
Commission to revise and amend the 01. Alternatively, commenters may
existing rules concerning the personal submit comments in paper form,
use of campaign funds, specifically to addressed to the Federal Election
clarify the application of those rules to Commission, Attn.: Robert M. Knop,
former candidates and officeholders. Assistant General Counsel, 1050 First
The published document contained Street NE, Washington, DC 20463.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Apr 19, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20APP1.SGM 20APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_17583/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-04-20 00:03:37
Document Modified: 2018-04-20 00:03:37
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received by May 21, 2018. | |
| Contact | Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist, or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 17506 | |
| CFR Associated | Almonds; Marketing Agreements; Nuts and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR