83 FR 17529 - Stainless Steel Bar From India: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Reinstatement of Certain Companies in the Antidumping Duty Order
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 77 (April 20, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 77 (April 20, 2018)
| Page Range | 17529-17531 | |
| FR Document | 2018-08290 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 17529-17531] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-08290] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-533-810] Stainless Steel Bar From India: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Reinstatement of Certain Companies in the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has determined that certain producers/exporters of stainless steel bar (SS Bar) from India made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. Accordingly, they are hereby reinstated in the antidumping order on SS Bar from India. DATES: Applicable April 20, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0410. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 18, 2017, Commerce published the preliminary results of this changed circumstances review and intent to reinstate Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd. and its affiliates Precision Metals, Sieves Manufacturers (India) Pvt. Ltd., and Hindustan Inox Ltd. (collectively, the Venus Group), and Viraj Prof[igrave]les Ltd. (Viraj) in the antidumping duty order on SS Bar from India.\1\ This review covers SS Bar from India produced and/or exported by the Venus Group and Viraj. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Stainless Steel Bar from India: Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Intent To Reinstate Certain Companies in the Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 48483, October 18, 2017 (CCR Preliminary Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 9, 2018, we received case briefs from the Venus Group and Viraj.\2\ On January 9, 2018, we received a rebuttal brief from the petitioners.\3\ On March 8, 2018, Commerce held a public hearing at the request of Viraj. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Letter from the Venus Group, ``Stainless Steel Bar from India: Administrative Case Brief of Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd.,'' dated January 9, 2018, and Letter from Viraj, ``Stainless Steel Bar from India: Case Brief,'' dated January 9, 2018. \3\ See Letters from the petitioners, ``Petitioners' Rebuttal Brief Regarding Venus,'' dated January 19, 2018, and ``Petitioners' Rebuttal Brief Regarding Viraj,'' dated January 19, 2018. The petitioners are Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible Industries LLC, Electralloy, a Division of G.O. Carlson, Inc., North-American Stainless, Outokumpu Stainless Bar, LLC, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce conducted this changed circumstances review in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.216(d). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memo can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review of Stainless Steel Bar from India,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is SS bar. SS bar means articles of stainless steel in straight lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled or otherwise cold- finished, or ground, having a uniform solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles, segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons, or other convex polygons. SS bar includes cold-finished [[Page 17530]] SS bars that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether produced from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as specified above, the term does not include stainless steel semi-finished products, cut-to-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut-to-length rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in coils, of any uniform solid cross section along their whole length, which do not conform to the definition of flat-rolled products), and angles, shapes, and sections. Imports of these products are currently classifiable under subheadings 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). Although the HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Basis for Reinstatement In requesting revocation, pursuant to 19 CFR 353.25(b) (1996) and 19 CFR 353.25(a)(2)(iii) (1996),\5\ both the Venus Group and Viraj agreed to immediate reinstatement of the order, so long as any exporter or producer is subject to the order, if the Secretary concludes that subsequent to the revocation, the Venus Group and/or Viraj sold SS Bar in the United States at less than NV.\6\ Under 19 CFR 353.25(a)(2)(iii) (1996), as long as any exporter or producer is subject to an antidumping duty order which remains in force, an entity previously granted a revocation may be reinstated under that order if it is established that the entity has resumed the dumping of subject merchandise. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The regulation that was in effect when the Venus Group and Viraj requested revocation was amended in 1997 to become 19 CFR 351.222(b). This regulation was then revoked in 2012. See Modification to Regulation Concerning the Revocation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 29875 (May 21, 2012). However, when revoking this regulation, Commerce noted that ``{a{time} ny company that has been revoked from an antidumping . . . order will remain subject to its certified agreement to be reinstated with respect to that order if Commerce finds it to have resumed dumping. . . .'' See id. at 29882. \6\ See Stainless Steel Bar from India; Final Results, Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review in Part, and Determination To Revoke in Part, 69 FR 55409 (September 14, 2004) (Viraj Revocation) and Stainless Steel Bar from India: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Revocation of the Order, in Part, 76 FR 56401 (September 13, 2011) (Venus Revocation). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In this case, because other exporters in India remain subject to the SS Bar order, the order remains in effect, and the Venus Group and/ or Viraj may be reinstated in the order. Commerce conditionally granted the Venus Group and Viraj revocation based, in part, upon their agreement to immediate reinstatement in the antidumping duty order if Commerce were to find that the companies resumed dumping of SS Bar from India.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Viraj Revocation, 69 FR at 55411 (``Viraj provided each of the certifications required under 19 CFR 351.222(e) . . . {including{time} an agreement to immediate reinstatement of the order if the Department concludes that the company, subsequent to the revocation, sold subject merchandise at less than NV.'') and Venus Revocation, 76 at 56402-3 (``the company has agreed to immediate reinstatement of the order if we find that it has resumed making sales at less than fair value''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we continue to find that the use of facts available is warranted in determining the dumping margin of the Venus Group and Viraj pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act. Further, we continue to find that the Venus Group and Viraj failed to cooperate to the best of their ability and, therefore, the use of facts available with an adverse inference is appropriate (AFA), pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act. We have assigned, as AFA, the rates below to the Venus Group and Viraj. Accordingly, we are reinstating the Venus Group and Viraj in the antidumping duty order on SS Bar from India. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this changed circumstances review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. Final Results of Review Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer/exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd. and its affiliates Precision 30.92 Metals, Sieves Manufacturers (India) Pvt. Ltd., and Hindustan Inox Ltd......................................... Viraj Prof[igrave]les Ltd \8\............................... 30.92 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with the final results of changed circumstances review within five days after public announcement of the final results of changed circumstances review in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Because Commerce used an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts otherwise available to each of the respondents in this changed circumstances review, in accordance with section 776 of the Act, there are no calculations to disclose. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ Viraj Alloys, Ltd., Viraj Forgings, Ltd., and Viraj Impoexpo, Ltd., are collectively now known as Viraj Profiles Limited. In July 2006, Viraj Forgings Ltd. merged with Viraj Alloys Ltd.; in April 2007, Viraj Alloys and Viraj Impoexpo Ltd. merged into Viraj Profiles Ltd. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements Because we established that SS bar from India produced and/or exported by the Venus Group and Viraj are being sold at less than NV, the Venus Group and Viraj are hereby reinstated in the antidumping duty order on SS Bar from India effective upon the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. We will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all entries at 30.92 percent and to continue to require a cash deposit at the current rate for all shipments of the subject merchandise of SS Bar produced and/or exported by either the Venus Group and Viraj and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after October 18, 2017, the date of publication of the preliminary results in the Federal Register. These instructions shall remain in effect until further notice. Notifications to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. [[Page 17531]] We are issuing and publishing these results of review in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216. Dated: April 16, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of the Issues a. Whether Adverse Facts Available Is Warranted for the Venus Group b. Whether Adverse Facts Available Is Warranted for Viraj 5. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-08290 Filed 4-19-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices 17529
Cash Deposit Requirements Dated: April 16, 2018. Viraj Profı̀les Ltd. (Viraj) in the
Gary Taverman, antidumping duty order on SS Bar from
The following cash deposit India.1 This review covers SS Bar from
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
requirements will be effective upon and Countervailing Duty Operations, India produced and/or exported by the
publication of the final results of this performing the non-exclusive functions and Venus Group and Viraj.
administrative review for all shipments duties of the Assistant Secretary for On January 9, 2018, we received case
of the subject merchandise from China Enforcement and Compliance. briefs from the Venus Group and Viraj.2
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, On January 9, 2018, we received a
for consumption on or after the Appendix
rebuttal brief from the petitioners.3 On
publication date as provided by section I. Summary March 8, 2018, Commerce held a public
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject II. Background hearing at the request of Viraj.
merchandise exported by the companies III. Scope of the Order Commerce conducted this changed
listed above that have separate rates, the IV. Discussion of the Issues circumstances review in accordance
cash deposit rate will be the rate Comment 1: Application of AFA to with section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act
established in these final results of Chengdu Huifeng New Material of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19
review for each exporter as listed above; Technology Co., Ltd.
Comment 2: Application of AFA to the
CFR 351.216(d). For a full description of
(2) for previously investigated or the methodology underlying our
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity
reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese conclusions, see the Issues and Decision
Comment 3: Selection of the AFA Rate
exporters not listed above that received Comment 4: Selection of the Separate Rate Memorandum.4 The Issues and Decision
a separate rate in a prior segment of this for Non-Selected Respondents Memorandum is a public document and
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will V. Recommendation is on file electronically via Enforcement
continue to be the exporter-specific rate; [FR Doc. 2018–08289 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am] and Compliance’s Antidumping and
(3) for all Chinese exporters of subject Countervailing Duty Centralized
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
merchandise that have not been found Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash ACCESS is available to registered users
deposit rate will be that for the China- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE at https://access.trade.gov, and it is
wide entity; (4) for all non-Chinese available to all parties in the Central
exporters of subject merchandise which International Trade Administration Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
have not received their own rate, the Department of Commerce building. In
[A–533–810]
cash deposit rate will be the rate addition, a complete version of the
applicable to the Chinese exporter that Stainless Steel Bar From India: Final Issues and Decision Memo can be
supplied that non-Chinese exporter. Results of Changed Circumstances accessed directly at http://
These deposit requirements shall Review and Reinstatement of Certain enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
remain in effect until further notice. Companies in the Antidumping Duty Scope of the Order
Notification to Importers Order
The merchandise subject to the order
This notice serves as a final reminder AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, is SS bar. SS bar means articles of
to importers of their responsibility International Trade Administration, stainless steel in straight lengths that
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Department of Commerce. have been either hot-rolled, forged,
certificate regarding the reimbursement SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled or
of antidumping duties prior to (Commerce) has determined that certain otherwise cold-finished, or ground,
liquidation of the relevant entries producers/exporters of stainless steel having a uniform solid cross section
during this POR. Failure to comply with bar (SS Bar) from India made sales of along their whole length in the shape of
this requirement could result in subject merchandise at less than normal circles, segments of circles, ovals,
Commerce’s presumption that value (NV) during the period of review rectangles (including squares), triangles,
reimbursement of the antidumping (POR) July 1, 2015, through June 30, hexagons, octagons, or other convex
duties occurred and the subsequent 2016. Accordingly, they are hereby polygons. SS bar includes cold-finished
assessment of doubled antidumping reinstated in the antidumping order on
duties. SS Bar from India. 1 See Stainless Steel Bar from India: Preliminary
Results of Changed Circumstances Review and
Administrative Protective Orders DATES: Applicable April 20, 2018. Intent To Reinstate Certain Companies in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 48483, October 18,
This notice also serves as the only Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, 2017 (CCR Preliminary Results).
2 See Letter from the Venus Group, ‘‘Stainless
reminder to parties subject to Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
Steel Bar from India: Administrative Case Brief of
administrative protective order (APO) of International Trade Administration, Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd.,’’ dated January 9,
their responsibility concerning the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 2018, and Letter from Viraj, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar
return or destruction of proprietary Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, from India: Case Brief,’’ dated January 9, 2018.
information disclosed under APO in DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0410. 3 See Letters from the petitioners, ‘‘Petitioners’
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Rebuttal Brief Regarding Venus,’’ dated January 19,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2018, and ‘‘Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief Regarding
Timely written notification of the return Viraj,’’ dated January 19, 2018. The petitioners are
or destruction of APO materials or Background Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible
conversion to judicial protective order is On October 18, 2017, Commerce Industries LLC, Electralloy, a Division of G.O.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
hereby requested. Failure to comply Carlson, Inc., North-American Stainless,
published the preliminary results of this Outokumpu Stainless Bar, LLC, Universal Stainless
with the regulations and terms of an changed circumstances review and & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna Slater
APO is a violation subject to sanction. intent to reinstate Venus Wire Industries Stainless, Inc.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
These final results of review are Pvt. Ltd. and its affiliates Precision
Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty Changed
issued and published in accordance Metals, Sieves Manufacturers (India) Circumstances Review of Stainless Steel Bar from
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Pvt. Ltd., and Hindustan Inox Ltd. India,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted
Act. (collectively, the Venus Group), and by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Apr 19, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_17606/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices 17531
We are issuing and publishing these SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Use of a nomination form standardizes
results of review in accordance with and limits the information collected as
I. Abstract
sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the part of the nomination process. This
Act and 19 CFR 351.216. The Minority Business Development makes the competition fair and eases the
Agency (MBDA) is the only federal burden on applicants and reviewers.
Dated: April 16, 2018.
agency created exclusively to foster the Participation in the National Minority
Gary Taverman,
growth and global competitiveness of
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Business Awards competition is
minority-owned businesses in the
and Countervailing Duty Operations, voluntary and the awards are strictly
United States. For this purpose, a
performing the non-exclusive functions and honorary.
duties of the Assistant Secretary for minority owned business must be
Enforcement and Compliance. owned or controlled by one of the II. Method of Collection
following persons or group of persons:
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in African American, American Indian, The form may be submitted
the Issues and Decision Memorandum Alaska Native, Asian, Hispanic, Native electronically or paper format.
1. Summary Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Asian
Indian, and Hasidic Jew. MBDA III. Data
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order provides management and technical OMB Control Number: 0640–0025.
4. Discussion of the Issues assistance to large, medium, and small
a. Whether Adverse Facts Available Is minority business enterprises through a Form Number(s): Not applicable.
Warranted for the Venus Group network of business centers throughout Type of Review: Regular submission.
b. Whether Adverse Facts Available Is
Warranted for Viraj
the United States. Affected Public: Businesses or other
5. Recommendation Since 1983, every president has for profit organizations, not-for-profit
issued a Presidential Proclamation
[FR Doc. 2018–08290 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am] institutions, State, Local, or Tribal
designating one week as National
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P government, and Federal government.
Minority Enterprise Development (MED)
Week. MBDA recognizes the role that Estimated Number of Respondents:
minority entrepreneurs play in building 100.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
the Nation’s economy by honoring Estimated Time per Response: 2
Minority Business Development businesses that are making a significant hours.
Agency contribution through the creation of
jobs, products and services, in addition Estimated Total Annual Burden
Proposed Information Collection; to supporting their local communities. Hours: 200.
Comment Request; National Minority The National Minority Business Awards Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Business Awards Program is a key element of MED Week Public: $0.
and celebrates the outstanding
AGENCY: Minority Business achievements of minority entrepreneurs. IV. Request for Comments
Development Agency, Department of MBDA may make awards in the
Commerce. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
following categories: Minority the proposed collection of information
ACTION: Notice. Construction Firm of the Year, Minority
is necessary for the proper performance
Export Firm of the Year, Minority
SUMMARY: The Department of of the functions of the agency, including
Manufacturing Firm of the Year,
Commerce, as part of its continuing whether the information shall have
Minority Health Products and Services
effort to reduce paperwork and practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Firm of the Year, Minority Innovative
respondent burden, invites the general agency’s estimate of the burden
Technology Firm of the Year, Minority
public and other Federal agencies to (including hours and cost) of the
Marketing and Communications Firm of
take this opportunity to comment on proposed collection of information; (c)
the Year, Minority Professional Services
proposed and/or continuing information ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
Firm of the Year, Minority Veteran-
collections, as required by the clarity of the information to be
Owned Firm of the Year, Minority
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. ‘‘Under 30’’ Firm of the Year, and collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
DATES: Written comments must be MBDA Minority Business Enterprise of burden of the collection of information
submitted on or before April 27, 2018. the Year. In addition, MBDA may on respondents, including through the
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments recognize trailblazers and champions use of automated collection techniques
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental through the Access to Capital Award, or other forms of information
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Advocate of the Year Award, technology.
Department of Commerce, Room 6616, Distinguished Supplier Diversity
14th and Constitution Avenue NW, Comments submitted in response to
Award, Abe Venable Legacy Award for
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Lifetime Achievement, and Ronald H. this notice will be summarized and/or
internet at PRAcomments@doc.gov). Brown Leadership Awards. All awards included in the request for OMB
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: will be presented at a ceremony during approval of this information collection;
Requests for additional information or National MED Week. Nominations for they also will become a matter of public
copies of the information collection these awards are open to the public. record.
instrument and instructions should be MBDA must collect two types of
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Sheleen Dumas,
directed to Antavia Grimsley, information: (a) Information identifying
Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the
Management Analyst, Minority Business the nominee and nominator, and (b) Chief Information Officer.
Development Agency, U.S. Department information explaining why the
[FR Doc. 2018–08270 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am]
of Commerce, Room 5063, 1401 nominee should be given the award.
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, The information will be used to BILLING CODE 3510–21–P
DC, 20230; telephone (202) 482–7458, determine those applicants best meeting
and email: agrimsley@mbda.gov. the preannounced evaluation criterion.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Apr 19, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_17606/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-04-20 00:03:31
Document Modified: 2018-04-20 00:03:31
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable April 20, 2018. | |
| Contact | Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0410. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 17529 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR