83 FR 18255 - Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Flint Hills Sulfur Dioxide (SO2
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 81 (April 26, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 81 (April 26, 2018)
| Page Range | 18255-18257 | |
| FR Document | 2018-08807 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 18255-18257] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-08807] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0099 FRL-9977-21--Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Flint Hills Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Revision AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Minnesota sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Flint Hills Resources, LLC Pine Bend Refinery (FHR) as submitted on February 8, 2017. The proposed SIP revision pertains to the introduction and removal of certain equipment at the refinery as well as amendments to certain emission limits, resulting in an overall decrease of SO2 emissions from FHR. DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 29, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2017-0099 at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Environmental Protection Specialist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8777, maietta.anthony@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: I. What is the background for this action? II. What is EPA's analysis of the SIP revision? a. Coker Replacement b. #4 Hydrogen Plant Reformer--30H401 Furnace c. Diesel Fire Water Pump at #4 Cooling Tower d. #3 Crude/Coker Improvements e. Cleanup III. SO2 SIP and Emissions Impacts IV. What action is EPA proposing? V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What is the background for this action? FHR operates an oil refinery located in the Pine Bend Area of Rosemount, Dakota County, Minnesota. On February 8, 2017, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) submitted a request to EPA to approve into the Minnesota SIP the conditions cited as ``Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.4(SO2 SIP); Title I Condition: 40 CFR 51; Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y'' in FHR's revised joint Title I/ Title V document, Permit No. 03700011-101 \1\ (joint document 101). Joint document 101 contains measures for FHR to implement changes that improve technology at the plant and increase efficiency through new and existing equipment, as well as clarifying amendments to the document's language. MPCA posted joint document 101 for public comment in the Minnesota State Register on November 21, 2016, and the comment period ended on December 23, 2016. MPCA received no comments on the document. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ In 1995, EPA approved consolidated permitting regulations into the Minnesota SIP. (60 FR 21447, May 2, 1995). The consolidated permitting regulations included the term ``Title I condition'' which was written, in part, to satisfy EPA requirements that SIP control measures remain permanent and enforceable. A ``Title I condition'' is defined, in part, as ``any condition based on source specific determination of ambient impacts imposed for the purpose of achieving or maintaining attainment with a national ambient air quality standard and which was part of a [SIP] approved by the EPA or submitted to the EPA pending approval under section 110 of the act. . .'' MINN. R. 7007.1011 (2013). The regulations also state that ``Title I conditions and the permittee's obligation to comply with them, shall not expire, regardless of the expiration of the other conditions of the permit.'' Further, ``any title I condition shall remain in effect without regard to permit expiration or reissuance, and shall be restated in the reissued permit.'' MINN. R. 7007.0450 (2007). Minnesota has initiated using the joint Title I/ Title V document as the enforceable document for imposing emission limitations and compliance requirements in SIPs. The SIP requirements in the joint Title I/Title V document submitted by MPCA are cited as ``Title I conditions,'' therefore ensuring that SIP requirements remain permanent and enforceable. EPA reviewed the state's procedure for using joint Title I/Title V documents to implement site specific SIP requirements and found it to be acceptable under both Title I and Title V of the Clean Air Act (July 3, 1997 letter from David Kee, EPA, to Michael J. Sandusky, MPCA). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. What is EPA's analysis of the SIP revision? Joint document 101, issued by MPCA on January 13, 2017, contains amended SIP conditions that, when combined, provide FHR with the ability to more efficiently upgrade hydrocarbons that are distilled from FHR's crude units into transportation fuels, primarily diesel. The amended SIP conditions allow FHR to increase fuel production and operate more efficiently and closer to the facility's overall distillation capacity. See Table 1 at the end of our review for a list of detailed changes to SO2 allowable emissions limits associated with this action. The amended SIP conditions in joint document 101 include: a. Coker Replacement. A coker replacement project consists of the installation of a new coker process unit (#4 Coker Unit Charge Heater/EQUI1456) into joint document 101. The new #4 Coker will replace the #1 and #2 Cokers, which will be permanently retired. In addition to their retirement, the SIP condition that lists the decoking scenario in which the #1 and #2 cokers' associated process units [[Page 18256]] operate simultaneously with 21H1 Steam/Air Heater Decoking unit (EQUI 493) and 21H2 Steam/Air Heater Decoking unit (EQUI 494) is being removed from joint document 101. b. #4 Hydrogen Plant Reformer--30H401 Furnace. The allowable SO2 emissions limit on the 30H401 furnace for the #4 Hydrogen Plant Reformer is being lowered. This is because the originally approved allowable SO2 limit for the heater assumed that it would operate on refinery fuel gas. Since start-up, the unit has primarily been operated on pressure swing adsorption offgas, which originates as a natural gas ahead of the reformer and does not contain sulfur. Because of the dual-fuel operation of the heater, its allowable SO2 limit has been reduced to meet actual operating conditions. c. Diesel Fire Water Pump at #4 Cooling Tower. The diesel fire water pump at the #4 cooling tower was decommissioned and so its SO2 emission limits are removed from joint document 101. d. #3 Crude/Coker Improvements. Improvements to the #3 crude/coker that were incorporated as ``Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.4(SO2 SIP); Title I Condition: 40 CFR 51; Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y'' conditions in a previous joint Title I/Title V document (Permit No. 03700011-010) have been completed and as a result, SIP conditions for three process heaters (EQUI495/EU034, EQUI496/EU035, and EQUI500/EU040) and two process heaters for steam-air decoking activities (EQUI498/ EU037 and EQUI499/EU038) are being removed from joint document 101. e. Cleanup. MPCA also requested to remove from the Minnesota SIP an emission limit for the ammonium thiosulfate process unit that was erroneously labeled as a ``Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.4(SO2 SIP); Title I Condition: 40 CFR 51; Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y'' condition in the prior joint Title I/Title V document, Permit No. 3700011-12 (joint document 12). EPA had approved joint document 12 into the Minnesota SIP on June 27, 2016 (81 FR 41447). The state-based SO2 limit for EQUI574 at condition 5.162.4 in joint document 12 are revised to be labeled a ``Minn. R. 7009.0080'' Title V condition in joint document 101. This is acceptable because the federal SO2 standards are still contained in joint document 101 and the erroneous condition incorporated into joint document 12 at 81 FR 41447 does not affect FHR's ability to meet the SO2 NAAQS. III. SO2 SIP and Emissions Impacts Joint document 101 removes SIP conditions for equipment that have been approved for shutdown and decommissioning in joint document 12, and that have been decommissioned from FHR and are no longer necessary. Joint document 101 also strengthens the Minnesota SIP by requiring new or more stringent limits on equipment. As shown in Table 1, for the 3- hour, 24-hour, and annual SO2 standards, allowable emissions are decreased by 95.402 lb/hr, 95.402 lb/hr, and 249.169 tpy, respectively, from the impact of the revisions to joint document 101. Joint document 101 becomes effective upon the effective date of EPA's approval of MPCA's February 8, 2017, request. Table 1--Summary of Changes to Allowable SO2 Emissions in Joint Document 101 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Change to allowable in Change to Unit Section in lb/hr (1-hr allowable in permit and 24-hr tpy (annual standards) standard) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMG 28/GP 011/Diesel engines w/SIP conditions.................. 5.23.3 -0.002 -0.009 EQUI 471/EU 296/#4 Hydrogen Plant Reformer--Refining Equipment.. 5.122.4 -69.4 -243.3 ----------------------------------------------- 5.122.8 22.7 79.7 EQUI 495/EU 034/#3 Coker Heater--Process Heater................. 5.133.1 -12.7 -44.6 EQUI496/EU 035/#3 Coker Heater--Process Heater.................. 5.134.1 -9.4 -13.4 EQUI 498/EU 037/Steam/Air Heater Decooking 23H-1--Process Heater 5.135.1 -20.2 -4.26 EQUI 500/EU 040/#3 Crude Unit Charge Heater--Process Heater..... 5.137.1 -19.5 -54.3 EQUI 1456/EQUI 24H-1/no description............................. 5.163.13 13.1 31 ----------------------------------------------- Total Change................................................ .............. -95.402 -249.169 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joint document 101 is approvable because EPA's review of the revised document shows that reductions of allowable SIP-based SO2 emissions, and strengthening of the Minnesota SIP will occur through corrections, clarifications, and revisions made since approval of joint document 12. IV. What action is EPA proposing? EPA is proposing to approve a revision to Minnesota's SO2 SIP for FHR, as submitted by MPCA on February 8, 2017, and reflected in conditions labeled ``Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.4(SO2 SIP); Title I Condition: 40 CFR 51; Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y'' in joint document 101. V. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA proposes to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA proposes to incorporate by reference all the conditions in Minnesota Permit No. 03700011-101 cited as ``Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.4(S02 SIP); Title I Condition: 40 CFR 51; Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y'', effective January 13, 2017. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section of this preamble for more information). VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of [[Page 18257]] the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. Dated: April 18, 2018. Cathy Stepp, Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2018-08807 Filed 4-25-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 18255
limitations, in pounds per million Confidential Business Information (CBI) (joint document 101). Joint document
British thermal units (lb/MMBtu), or other information whose disclosure is 101 contains measures for FHR to
averaged over a rolling 30-day period: restricted by statute. Multimedia implement changes that improve
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be technology at the plant and increase
NOX Emission accompanied by a written comment. efficiency through new and existing
Source name limit The written comment is considered the equipment, as well as clarifying
(lb/MMBtu)
official comment and should include amendments to the document’s
Antelope Valley Station, Unit discussion of all points you wish to language. MPCA posted joint document
1 ........................................ 0.17 make. EPA will generally not consider 101 for public comment in the
Antelope Valley Station, Unit comments or comment contents located Minnesota State Register on November
2 ........................................ 0.17 outside of the primary submission (i.e. 21, 2016, and the comment period
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing ended on December 23, 2016. MPCA
(2) * * * system). For additional submission received no comments on the document.
(d) Compliance date. The owners and methods, please contact the person
operators of Antelope Valley Station II. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP
identified in the FOR FURTHER revision?
shall comply with the emissions INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
limitations and other requirements of full EPA public comment policy, Joint document 101, issued by MPCA
this section as expeditiously as information about CBI or multimedia on January 13, 2017, contains amended
practicable, but no later than July 31, submissions, and general guidance on SIP conditions that, when combined,
2018, unless otherwise indicated in making effective comments, please visit provide FHR with the ability to more
specific paragraphs. https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ efficiently upgrade hydrocarbons that
* * * * * commenting-epa-dockets. are distilled from FHR’s crude units into
[FR Doc. 2018–08623 Filed 4–25–18; 8:45 am] transportation fuels, primarily diesel.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P The amended SIP conditions allow FHR
Anthony Maietta, Environmental to increase fuel production and operate
Protection Specialist, Control Strategies more efficiently and closer to the
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), facility’s overall distillation capacity.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Environmental Protection Agency, See Table 1 at the end of our review for
AGENCY
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, a list of detailed changes to SO2
40 CFR Part 52 Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8777, allowable emissions limits associated
maietta.anthony@epa.gov. with this action. The amended SIP
[EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0099 FRL–9977–21— SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Region 5] conditions in joint document 101
Throughout this document whenever include:
Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Flint ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information a. Coker Replacement.
Hills Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Revision
section is arranged as follows: A coker replacement project consists
AGENCY: Environmental Protection of the installation of a new coker
I. What is the background for this action?
Agency (EPA). II. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP revision? process unit (#4 Coker Unit Charge
ACTION: Proposed rule. a. Coker Replacement Heater/EQUI1456) into joint document
b. #4 Hydrogen Plant Reformer—30H401 101. The new #4 Coker will replace the
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Furnace #1 and #2 Cokers, which will be
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a c. Diesel Fire Water Pump at #4 Cooling permanently retired. In addition to their
revision to the Minnesota sulfur dioxide Tower retirement, the SIP condition that lists
(SO2) State Implementation Plan (SIP) d. #3 Crude/Coker Improvements the decoking scenario in which the #1
for the Flint Hills Resources, LLC Pine e. Cleanup and #2 cokers’ associated process units
Bend Refinery (FHR) as submitted on III. SO2 SIP and Emissions Impacts
February 8, 2017. The proposed SIP IV. What action is EPA proposing?
permanent and enforceable. A ‘‘Title I condition’’
revision pertains to the introduction and V. Incorporation by Reference
is defined, in part, as ‘‘any condition based on
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews source specific determination of ambient impacts
removal of certain equipment at the
imposed for the purpose of achieving or
refinery as well as amendments to I. What is the background for this maintaining attainment with a national ambient air
certain emission limits, resulting in an action? quality standard and which was part of a [SIP]
overall decrease of SO2 emissions from FHR operates an oil refinery located
approved by the EPA or submitted to the EPA
FHR. pending approval under section 110 of the act. . .’’
in the Pine Bend Area of Rosemount, MINN. R. 7007.1011 (2013). The regulations also
DATES: Comments must be received on Dakota County, Minnesota. On February state that ‘‘Title I conditions and the permittee’s
or before May 29, 2018. 8, 2017, the Minnesota Pollution obligation to comply with them, shall not expire,
regardless of the expiration of the other conditions
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Control Agency (MPCA) submitted a of the permit.’’ Further, ‘‘any title I condition shall
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– request to EPA to approve into the remain in effect without regard to permit expiration
OAR–2017–0099 at https:// Minnesota SIP the conditions cited as or reissuance, and shall be restated in the reissued
www.regulations.gov or via email to permit.’’ MINN. R. 7007.0450 (2007). Minnesota has
‘‘Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.4(SO2 initiated using the joint Title I/Title V document as
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments SIP); Title I Condition: 40 CFR 51; Title the enforceable document for imposing emission
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y’’ in limitations and compliance requirements in SIPs.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
online instructions for submitting FHR’s revised joint Title I/Title V The SIP requirements in the joint Title I/Title V
comments. Once submitted, comments document submitted by MPCA are cited as ‘‘Title
document, Permit No. 03700011–101 1 I conditions,’’ therefore ensuring that SIP
cannot be edited or removed from requirements remain permanent and enforceable.
Regulations.gov. For either manner of 1 In 1995, EPA approved consolidated permitting
EPA reviewed the state’s procedure for using joint
submission, EPA may publish any regulations into the Minnesota SIP. (60 FR 21447, Title I/Title V documents to implement site specific
May 2, 1995). The consolidated permitting SIP requirements and found it to be acceptable
comment received to its public docket. regulations included the term ‘‘Title I condition’’ under both Title I and Title V of the Clean Air Act
Do not submit electronically any which was written, in part, to satisfy EPA (July 3, 1997 letter from David Kee, EPA, to Michael
information you consider to be requirements that SIP control measures remain J. Sandusky, MPCA).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:23 Apr 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_18336/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 18257
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
action merely approves state law as COMMISSION
meeting Federal requirements and does Environmental protection, Air
not impose additional requirements pollution control, Incorporation by 47 CFR Part 10
beyond those imposed by state law. For reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping [PS Docket Nos. 15–91, 15–94; DA 18–302]
that reason, this action:
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
• Is not a significant regulatory action Parties Asked To Refresh the Record
subject to review by the Office of Dated: April 18, 2018. on Facilitating Multimedia Content in
Management and Budget under Cathy Stepp, Wireless Emergency Alerts
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Regional Administrator, Region 5. AGENCY: Federal Communications
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, [FR Doc. 2018–08807 Filed 4–25–18; 8:45 am] Commission.
January 21, 2011);
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ACTION: Proposed rule.
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory SUMMARY: In this document, the Public
action because SIP approvals are Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
exempted under Executive Order 12866; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND (Bureau) seeks to refresh the record on
• Does not impose an information HUMAN SERVICES the issue of facilitating multimedia
collection burden under the provisions content (such as photos and maps) in
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Administration for Children and Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA)
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Families messages raised in the 2016 Report and
• Is certified as not having a Order and Further Notice of Proposed
significant economic impact on a 45 CFR Part 1355 Rulemaking in this proceeding.
substantial number of small entities DATES: Comments are due on or before
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 RIN 0970–AC76 May 29, 2018 and reply comments are
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); due on or before June 11, 2018.
• Does not contain any unfunded Adoption and Foster Care Analysis ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
mandate or significantly or uniquely and Reporting System identified by PS Docket Nos. 15–91 and
affect small governments, as described 15–94, by any of the following methods:
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AGENCY: Children’s Bureau (CB), • Federal eRulemaking Portal:
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); Administration on Children Youth and https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
Families (ACYF), Administration for instructions for submitting comments.
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Children and Families (ACF), • Federal Communications
Department of Health and Human Commission’s Website: https://
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Services (HHS).
1999); www.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Is not an economically significant ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking;
• Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or
regulatory action based on health or correction.
messenger delivery, by commercial
safety risks subject to Executive Order overnight courier, or by first-class or
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); SUMMARY: This document corrects the
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
• Is not a significant regulatory action Regulatory Identification Number (RIN)
(although the Commission continues to
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR that appeared in the heading of a Notice
experience delays in receiving U.S.
28355, May 22, 2001); of Proposed Rulemaking published in
Postal Service mail). All filings must be
the Federal Register of March 15, 2018.
• Is not subject to requirements of addressed to the Commission’s
Through that document, the Children’s
Section 12(d) of the National Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Bureau proposed to delay the
Technology Transfer and Advancement Federal Communications Commission.
compliance and effective dates in the • People With Disabilities: Contact
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and the FCC to request reasonable
application of those requirements would
Reporting System (AFCARS) 2016 final accommodations (accessible format
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
rule for title IV–E agencies to comply documents, sign language interpreters,
and
with agency rules for an additional two CART, etc.) by Email: FCC504@fcc.gov
• Does not provide EPA with the fiscal years.
discretionary authority to address, as or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202)
appropriate, disproportionate human DATES: April 26, 2018. 418–0432.
health or environmental effects, using For detailed instructions for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
practicable and legally permissible submitting comments and additional
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking FR Doc
methods, under Executive Order 12898 information on the rulemaking process,
2018–05038, beginning on page 11450
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
in the issue of March 15, 2018, the RIN
In addition, the SIP is not approved appeared incorrectly in the heading of section of this document.
to apply on any Indian reservation land the document as RIN 0970–AC47. The FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
or in any other area where EPA or an RIN is corrected to read ‘‘RIN 0970– A. Evanoff, Attorney-Advisor, Policy
and Licensing Division, Public Safety
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a AC76’’.
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of and Homeland Security Bureau, (202)
Dated: April 20, 2018. 418–0848 or john.evanoff@fcc.gov.
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose Ann C. Agnew, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
substantial direct costs on tribal Executive Secretary to the Department, summary of the Commission’s
governments or preempt tribal law as Department of Health and Human Services. document in PS Docket Nos. 15–91, 15–
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 [FR Doc. 2018–08736 Filed 4–25–18; 8:45 am] 94; DA 18–302, released on March 28,
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). BILLING CODE 4184–25–P 2018. It is available on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:23 Apr 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_18336/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-02 08:20:19
Document Modified: 2018-11-02 08:20:19
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before May 29, 2018. | |
| Contact | Anthony Maietta, Environmental Protection Specialist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8777, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 18255 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur Oxides |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR