83 FR 19021 - Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for the Yamaha Fazer R

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 84 (May 1, 2018)

Page Range		19021-19024
FR Document		2018-09102

The FAA announces the availability of and requests comments on proposed airworthiness criteria for an unmanned aircraft system, Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., model Fazer R. This document proposes policy for a special class of aircraft, to designate airworthiness criteria found by the FAA to provide an equivalent level of safety, for this proposed design, to existing standards.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19021-19024]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09102]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 21

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0379]

Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for
the Yamaha Fazer R

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed airworthiness criteria.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA announces the availability of and requests comments on
proposed airworthiness criteria for an unmanned aircraft system, Yamaha
Motor Corporation, U.S.A., model Fazer R. This document proposes policy
for a special class of aircraft, to designate airworthiness criteria
found by the FAA to provide an equivalent level of safety, for this
proposed design, to existing standards.

DATES: Send comments on or before May 31, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2018-0379
using any of the following methods:
[ssquf] Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
[ssquf] Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
[ssquf] Hand Delivery of Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

[[Page 19022]]

[ssquf] Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information
the commenter provides. Using the search function of the docket
website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all comments
received into any FAA docket, including the name of the individual
sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement can
be found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Quentin Coon, AIR-692, Federal
Aviation Administration, Policy & Innovation Division, Small Airplane
Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification Service, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, MO 64106, telephone (816) 329-4168, facsimile (816) 329-
4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

We invite interested people to take part in the development of
these airworthiness criteria by sending written comments, data, or
views. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the
airworthiness criteria, explain the reason for any recommended change,
and include supporting data. We ask that you send us two copies of
written comments.
We will consider all comments received on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change
these airworthiness criteria based on received comments.

Background

Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. (Yamaha) applied to the FAA on
April 28, 2017 for special class type certification under Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17(b) for the Fazer R Unmanned
Aircraft System (UAS). The Fazer R UAS (Fazer R) consists of the
Unmanned Aircraft (UA), flight transmitter ground control station, and
payload spray system. The Fazer R is a vertical take-off UAS that is of
the traditional main/tail rotor helicopter design. Its intended primary
use is conducting crop-spraying operations in the agricultural
industry.
The aircraft and payload spray system would weigh approximately 244
lbs with full fuel and oil tanks, and be able to carry a payload of
approximately 105 lbs. The main rotor is just over nine feet in
diameter, and the aircraft would be just over three feet high and 12
feet long with a carbon frame. The aircraft would be powered by a fuel-
injected 2-cylinder engine running on regular gasoline. The aircraft
would have a ``Turn Assistance'' function that enables automatic
turning to facilitate back-and-forth agricultural operations.
The proposed policy was developed in order to establish
performance-based airworthiness criteria appropriate for the Yamaha
Fazer R.

Discussion

The FAA establishes airworthiness criteria to ensure the safe
operation of aircraft in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44701(a) and 44704.
The applicant has proposed a design with constraints upon its
operations and an unusual design characteristic: The pilot is remotely
located. The FAA proposes that existing airworthiness criteria,
including Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 23 and
27, do not provide criteria appropriate to the proposed design.
The FAA proposes this aircraft is a ``special class'' under 14 CFR
21.17(b), and proposes that the following airworthiness criteria are
appropriate for this aircraft and would provide an equivalent level of
safety to existing airworthiness standards. These proposed
airworthiness criteria differ from those in 14 CFR parts 23 and 27 due
to the aircraft's design, which includes various constraints upon the
aircraft's operation. These constraints include its relatively small
size, lack of humans on board, and operations that would be limited to
remote locations, low altitude, and visual range of a trained flight
crew.
The FAA has reviewed the proposed design and assessed the potential
risk to the National Aerospace System (NAS). The FAA took into
consideration the size of the proposed aircraft, its maximum airspeed
and altitude, and operational limitations such as where it would
operate and whether it would operate out of sight of its operators.
These factors allowed the FAA to estimate the kinetic energy of the
proposed design when in operation, and the potential risk the aircraft
could pose to other aircraft and people and property nearby. Using
these types of parameters, the FAA developed airworthiness criteria
appropriate for that risk to ensure the aircraft remains reliable,
controllable, safe, and airworthy.
The particular airworthiness criteria proposed by this notice were
selected for the following reasons:
UAS Concept of Operations: To assist the FAA in identifying and
analyzing the risks and impacts associated with integrating the Fazer R
proposed design into the NAS, the applicant would be required to submit
a Concept of Operations (CONOPS). The CONOPS identifies the applicant's
proposed operational concepts for this aircraft and would contain a
description of the UAS and its operation.
UAS Means of Compliance: To address the risks associated with
inadequate or incomplete showings of compliance to the performance-
based criteria described in this notice, the proposed airworthiness
criteria include a requirement that the applicant only utilize a means
of compliance accepted by the FAA, in accordance with FAA Advisory
Circular 23.2010-1.
UAS Operational Envelope and Limitations: In order to ensure the
UAS is operated only in accordance with its type design, the applicant
must define the operational envelope and proposed operational
limitations. The applicant would be required to show that the UAS can
be operated safely and reliably within the operational envelope and
limitations, mitigating the hazards that could result from an
unconstrained operating envelope.
UAS Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA): To address the
risks associated with degradation of the aircraft caused by age and
use, and to ensure that the UAS can be maintained for safe operation,
the applicant would be required to prepare Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness for the UAS that are accepted by the FAA, in accordance
with FAA Order 8110.54A. The proposed criteria are derived from 14 CFR
parts 23 and 27, and past FAA practices, but are tailored for this
proposed design.
UAS Flight Manual: To address the risks associated with improper
operation of the UAS, such as flight above the approved operating
altitude, at weights above maximum takeoff weight, and at speeds
greater than the maximum allowed speed, the applicant would be required
to provide a flight manual. The manual would be used to ensure that the
flight crew operates the aircraft only within the proposed operational
envelope and limitations.

[[Page 19023]]

UAS Flight Testing: To address the risks associated with inadequate
design and integration, the applicant would be required to conduct
flight testing to demonstrate adequate structure, system reliability,
and proper function.
UAS Critical Parts: To ensure the continued airworthiness of the
aircraft and address the risks of castrophic failure, which is a
failure that causes a fatal injury or results in destruction of the
UAS, the applicant would be required to identify those parts that could
cause a catastrophic event upon failure. Those parts must be properly
maintained to prevent a catastrophic failure.
UAS Controls: To address the risks associated with loss of control
of the UAS caused by the failure or improper use of UAS controls, the
applicant would be required to design controls that are adequate to
safely and reliably control the UAS.
UAS Flight Termination System: To address the risks associated with
uncontrolled flight and inadvertent or unsafe operation, the applicant
would be required to provide a means to quickly and safely terminate
the UAS flight.
UAS Engine and Engine Control System: To address the risks
associated with failure or loss of control of the powerplant, the
applicant would be required to design the engine and engine controls so
that they are durable and reliable.
UAS Powerplant Installation: To address the risks associated with
failure of the powerplant installation that includes each component
necessary for propulsion or that affects propulsion safety, the
applicant would be required to design the powerplant installation to
ensure its continued safe operation.
UAS Systems and Equipment: To address the risks associated with the
failure or malfunction of electric and mechanical systems and
equipment, the applicant would be required to design and install the
systems and equipment to perform safely and reliably their intended
function when considered separately and in relation to other systems.
UAS Communication: To address the risks associated with loss of
communication between the flight crew members and between the flight
crew and the UA, the applicant would be required to provide an FAA
approved means that allows for all communication necessary to safely
operate the UA.
UAS Interference from External Sources: To address the risks
associated with cyber threats and system failures or malfunctions, the
applicant would be required to design the UAS' electronic systems and
networks to protect against and minimize the effects of intentional and
unintentional external interference.
UAS Interference with Other Aircraft or Obstacles: To address the
risks associated with collisions with obstacles and other aircraft, the
applicant would be required to use an FAA accepted means of compliance
showing how the UAS will remain well clear of obstacles and other
aircraft so as to avoid the risk of collision.

Operational Considerations

The following operational considerations were derived from the
applicant's CONOPS, which helped drive the development of these
proposed airworthiness criteria. The aircraft would:
1. Be primarily used for agricultural use to include spraying,
sensing, and imaging.
2. Operate in remote or sparsely populated areas.
3. Not operate over people and occupied vehicles on roads and
highways.
4. Operate at 400 feet above ground level (AGL) or lower.
5. Operate at a maximum altitude of 6,500 feet above mean sea level
(MSL).
6. Be operated within Visual Line of Sight (VLOS) as defined in 14
CFR part 107.31, Visual line-of-sight aircraft operation.
7. Be operated by a minimum flight crew consisting of one pilot-in-
command (PIC) and one visual observer.
8. Be operated by a flight crew that is appropriately qualified and
trained.
9. Be operated by a minimum flight crew that would operate only one
UAS at any time.
10. Be operated by a flight crew that has successfully completed
required flight crew training.
11. Be maintained by persons who hold required FAA maintenance
certificates or work according to an FAA approved maintenance program.
12. Be maintained by persons who have completed required
maintenance training.
13. Be equipped with caution and alerting annunciation that is
visible to the PIC and visual observer during flight.
14. Remain within Radio Line-of-Sight (RLOS) of the control
station. RLOS is the straight and unobstructed path between the
transmitting and receiving antennas.
15. Electronically communicate between the UA and the ground
control station only within frequencies approved by the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC).
16. Operate in Class G airspace unless specifically authorized by
the FAA.
17. Operate subject to minimum setback distances that define how
far people must be from the UA, the control station, and the operating
zone when the UA is operating.
18. Operate within specific meteorological conditions that define
permissible wind speeds, turbulence, visibility, outside air
temperature, or other parameters as identified. The UAS would not
operate in icing conditions, in accordance with 14 CFR 91.527.
19. Operate in day Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC).

Note: A change to the CONOPS may require a change to the
airworthiness criteria.

Proposed Airworthiness Criteria

The FAA proposes to establish, as a matter of policy, the following
airworthiness criteria for type certification of the Yamaha Fazer R.
The FAA proposes that compliance with the following would appropriately
mitigate the risks associated with the proposed design and Concept of
Operations (CONOPS) and would provide an equivalent level of safety to
existing rules:
UAS Concept of Operations: The applicant must define and submit to
the FAA a (CONOPS) proposal describing the intended UAS operation in
the National Airspace System (NAS).
UAS Accepted Means of Compliance:
1. An applicant must comply with these airworthiness criteria using
a means of compliance, which may include consensus standards, accepted
by the FAA.
2. An applicant requesting acceptance of a means of compliance must
provide the means of compliance to the FAA in a form and manner
acceptable to the FAA.
UAS Operational Envelope and Limitations: The operational envelope
and operational limitations must be defined:
1. The UAS must be shown to perform as intended within the defined
operational envelope and operational limitations.
2. The UAS must be consistently and predictably controllable and
maneuverable within the operating envelope, including:
(a) At all loading conditions for which certification is requested;
(b) During all phases of flight; and
(c) During configuration changes.
UAS Instructions for Continued Airworthiness: The applicant must
prepare Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) for the UAS that
are acceptable to the FAA. The ICA may

[[Page 19024]]

be incomplete at type certification if a program exists to ensure their
completion prior to delivery of the first UAS or issuance of a standard
certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs later.
The ICA must contain a section titled Airworthiness Limitations
that is segregated and clearly distinguishable from the rest of the
document. This section must set forth each mandatory replacement time,
structural inspection interval, and related structural inspection
procedure required for type certification. If the ICA consist of
multiple documents, the section required by this paragraph must be
included in the principal manual. This section must contain a legible
statement in a prominent location that reads ``The Airworthiness
Limitations section is FAA approved and specifies maintenance conducted
under Sec. Sec. 43.16 and 91.403 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations unless an alternative program has been FAA approved.''
UAS Flight Manual: The applicant must provide a UAS Flight Manual
with each UAS. The UAS Flight Manual must contain the following
information--
(a) UAS operating limitations;
(b) UAS normal and emergency operating procedures;
(c) Performance information;
(d) Loading information; and
(e) Other information that is necessary for safe operation because
of design, operating, or handling characteristics.
UAS Flight Testing: The UAS must successfully complete at least 150
hours of flight testing to determine whether there is reasonable
assurance that the UAS, its components, its equipment, and structures
are adequate, reliable, and function properly. The testing must consist
of:
1. At least 50 hours with the Unmanned Aircraft (UA) at 5 percent
over maximum weight at critical weight, altitude, and temperature; and
2. At least 100 hours in normal operations.
UAS Critical Parts: A critical part is a part, the failure of which
could have a catastrophic effect upon the UAS. If the type design
includes critical parts, a critical parts list must be established.
The applicant must develop and define inspections or other
procedures to prevent failures due to degradation of critical parts.
Each of these inspections or procedures must be included in the
Airworthiness Limitations Section of the ICA.
UAS Controls:
1. Flight Controls: The applicant must design the flight control
systems and control station to:
(a) Operate easily, smoothly, and positively enough to allow proper
performance of their functions, and
(b) Protect against likely hazards.
2. Flight Crew Interface: The control station must be designed to
allow the flight crew to perform their duties and to perform any
maneuvers within the operating envelope of the UAS, without excessive
concentration, skill, alertness, or fatigue considering the intended
operating conditions for the control station.
3. Equipment: The applicant must define and install necessary
equipment so the flight crew can monitor and perform defined tasks
associated with the intended functions of the systems and equipment.
4. Flight Crew Error: The UAS must be designed to minimize flight
crew errors which could result in additional hazards.
UAS Flight Termination System:
1. There must be a means for the flight crew to quickly and safely
terminate the UA flight.
2. The UAS must have a means to safely terminate the UA flight when
safe operation cannot continue or be maintained.
3. There must be means to prevent inadvertent operation of the
flight termination system.
UAS Engine and Engine Control System:
1. The UAS Engine and Engine Control System includes each component
necessary for propulsion or which affects propulsion safety.
2. The UAS Engine and Engine Control System installation must be
designed, constructed, installed, and maintained to ensure its
continued safe operation within the operational envelope between normal
inspections and overhauls.
3. The UAS Engine Control System including any Engine Control Unit
(ECU) software or electronic hardware must be designed and developed
using methods accepted by the FAA.
4. The applicant must identify the UAS Engine and Engine Control
System failure modes and effects that may result in a catastrophic
condition to the UAS. The applicant must mitigate each hazard to a
level acceptable to the FAA.
5. The UAS Engine and Engine Control System operability, durability
and reliability must be demonstrated.
UAS Powerplant Installation:
1. The powerplant installation includes each part of the UAS (other
than the main and auxiliary rotor structures) that--
(a) Is necessary for propulsion;
(b) Affects the control of the major propulsive units; or
(c) Affects the safety of the major propulsive units between normal
inspections or overhauls.
2. Each component of the powerplant installation must be
constructed, arranged, and installed to ensure its continued safe
operation between normal inspections or overhauls for the range of
temperature and altitude for which approval is requested.
UAS Systems and Equipment: This requirement applies to the UAS
unless another requirement has been imposed for a specific piece of
equipment, system, or systems. The UAS systems and equipment, including
any software or electronic hardware, must be designed and developed
using methods accepted by the FAA.
1. The systems and equipment required for a UAS to operate safely
in the kinds of operations for which certification is requested must be
designed and installed to perform their intended function throughout
the operating and environmental limits for which the UAS is
certificated.
2. All systems and equipment not covered by paragraph 1 of this
section, considered separately and in relation to other systems, must
be designed and installed so their operation or failure, does not have
an adverse effect on the UAS.
UAS Communication:
1. The applicant must define the type, methods, and operational
limits of communication, including the mitigation of any hazard created
by any loss of communication between the flight crew and between the
flight crew and the UAS.
2. A means must be provided to allow for all communication
necessary to safely operate the UA.
UAS Interference from External Sources: The design must minimize
the risks associated with interference to UAS electronic systems and
networks from external sources.
UAS Interference with Other Aircraft or Obstacles: The UAS must
have a means to remain well clear of obstacles and other aircraft for
its intended operation and airspace to avoid the risk of collision.

Note: The FAA may propose amending this airworthiness criteria,
or propose additional operational criteria, prior to approval of the
type design.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 23, 2018.
Pat Mullen,
Manager, Small Airplane Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-09102 Filed 4-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules 19021

exemptions are needed to protect following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 noted above, and therefore DHS is not
information relating to DHS activities U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), required to establish requirements, rules, or
from disclosure to subjects or others (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f). When a record procedures with respect to such access.
received from another system has been Providing notice to individuals with respect
related to these activities. Specifically,
exempted in that source system under 5 to existence of records pertaining to them in
the exemptions are required to avoid U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), DHS will claim the same the system of records or otherwise setting up
disclosure of screening techniques; to exemptions for those records that are claimed procedures pursuant to which individuals
protect the identities and physical safety for the original primary systems of records may access and view records pertaining to
of confidential informants and law from which they originated and claims any themselves in the system would undermine
enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS’s additional exemptions set forth here. investigative efforts and reveal the identities
ability to obtain information from third Exemptions from these particular of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
parties and other sources; to protect the subsections are justified, on a case-by-case confidential informants.
basis to be determined at the time a request
privacy of third parties; and to safeguard Philip S. Kaplan,
is made, for the following reasons:
classified information. Disclosure of (a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
information to the subject of the inquiry Disclosures) because release of the Homeland Security.
could also permit the subject to avoid accounting of disclosures could alert the [FR Doc. 2018–09195 Filed 4–30–18; 8:45 am]
detection or apprehension. subject of an investigation of an actual or
BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P
In appropriate circumstances, when potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
compliance would not appear to violation to the existence of that investigation
interfere with or adversely affect the law and reveal investigative interest on the part
enforcement purposes of this system of DHS as well as the recipient agency. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
and the overall law enforcement
present a serious impediment to law Federal Aviation Administration
process, the applicable exemptions may enforcement efforts and efforts to preserve
be waived on a case by case basis. national security. Disclosure of the
A notice of system of records for DHS/ 14 CFR Part 21
accounting would also permit the individual
ALL–039 Foreign Access Management who is the subject of a record to impede the [Docket No. FAA–2018–0379]
System of Records is also published in investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
this issue of the Federal Register. evidence, and to avoid detection or Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class
apprehension, which would undermine the Airworthiness Criteria for the Yamaha
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5 entire investigative process. When an
investigation has been completed,
Fazer R
Freedom of information, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the information on disclosures made may AGENCY: Federal Aviation
continue to be exempted if the fact that an Administration (FAA), DOT.
preamble, DHS proposes to amend investigation occurred remains sensitive after
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal completion. ACTION: Notice of proposed
Regulations, as follows: (b) From subsection (d) (Access and airworthiness criteria.
Amendment to Records) because access to
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS the records contained in this system of SUMMARY: The FAA announces the
AND INFORMATION records could inform the subject of an availability of and requests comments
investigation of an actual or potential on proposed airworthiness criteria for
■ 1. Revise the authority citation for Part criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the an unmanned aircraft system, Yamaha
5 to read as follows: existence of that investigation and reveal Motor Corporation, U.S.A., model Fazer
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. investigative interest on the part of DHS or R. This document proposes policy for a
107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301. another agency. Access to the records could
special class of aircraft, to designate
permit the individual who is the subject of
■ 2. Amend appendix C to part 5 by a record to impede the investigation, to airworthiness criteria found by the FAA
adding paragraph 78: tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to to provide an equivalent level of safety,
avoid detection or apprehension. for this proposed design, to existing
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Amendment of the records could interfere standards.
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
with ongoing investigations and law
DATES: Send comments on or before
* * * * * enforcement activities and would impose an
78. The DHS/ALL–039 Foreign Access unreasonable administrative burden by May 31, 2018.
Management System of Records consists of requiring investigations to be continually ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
electronic and paper records and will be used reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access by docket number FAA–2018–0379
by DHS and its components. The DHS/ALL– and amendment to such information could using any of the following methods:
039 Foreign Access Management System of disclose security-sensitive information that D Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
Records is a repository of information held could be detrimental to homeland security. http://www.regulations.gov and follow
by DHS in connection with its several and (c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
the online instructions for sending your
varied missions and functions, including, but Necessity of Information) because in the
not limited to the enforcement of civil and course of investigations into potential comments electronically.
criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and violations of federal law, the accuracy of D Mail: Send comments to Docket
proceedings there under; and national information obtained or introduced Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
security and intelligence activities. The DHS/ occasionally may be unclear, or the Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
ALL–039 Foreign Access Management information may not be strictly relevant or Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
System of Records contains information that necessary to a specific investigation. In the Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
is collected by, on behalf of, in support of, interests of effective law enforcement, it is
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS

20590–0001.
or in cooperation with DHS and its appropriate to retain all information that may D Hand Delivery of Courier: Take
components and may contain personally aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
comments to Docket Operations in
identifiable information collected by other activity.
federal, state, local, tribal, foreign, or (d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), Room W12–140 of the West Building
international government agencies. and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f) Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
The Secretary of Homeland Security, (Agency Rules), because portions of this Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), (k)(2), and system are exempt from the individual access a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
(k)(5), has exempted this system from the provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons Friday, except Federal holidays.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Apr 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM 01MYP1

Document Created: 2018-05-01 00:23:33
Document Modified: 2018-05-01 00:23:33

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed airworthiness criteria.
Dates		Send comments on or before May 31, 2018.
Contact		Mr. Quentin Coon, AIR-692, Federal Aviation Administration, Policy & Innovation Division, Small Airplane Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106, telephone (816) 329-4168, facsimile (816) 329- 4090.
FR Citation		83 FR 19021

83 FR 19021 - Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for the Yamaha Fazer R

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFederal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 84 (May 1, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration