83 FR 22225 - Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 93 (May 14, 2018)

Page Range		22225-22227
FR Document		2018-10188

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone for certain navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near New Orleans, LA, during a fireworks display on August 25, 2018. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 93 (Monday, May 14, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22225-22227]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10188]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0348]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone 
for certain navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River. This 
action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these 
navigable waters near New Orleans, LA, during a fireworks display on 
August 25, 2018. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and 
vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain 
of the Port Sector New Orleans or a designated representative. We 
invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before June 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0348 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Commander Benjamin 
Morgan, Sector New Orleans Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone 504-365-2231, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MM Mile marker
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On April 9, 2018, AFX Pro, LLC, notified the Coast Guard that it 
would be conducting a fireworks display from 9 p.m. through 10 p.m. on 
August 25, 2018, for the National Guard Association of the United 
States Annual Conference. The fireworks will be launched from a barge 
in the Mississippi River at approximate mile marker (MM) 96.2 above 
Head of Passes, New Orleans, LA. Hazards from firework displays include 
accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling 
hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans 
(COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the 
fireworks to be used in this display would be a safety concern for 
anyone within a one-mile stretch of the river.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels 
on the navigable waters within a one-mile stretch of the river before, 
during, and after the fireworks display. The Coast Guard proposes this 
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 8:45 p.m. through 
10 p.m. on August 25, 2018. The safety zone would cover all navigable 
waters of the Mississippi River above Head of Passes between mile 
markers (MM) 95.7 and 96.7. The duration of the zone is intended to 
ensure the safety of vessels

[[Page 22226]]

and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled 
fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the 
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated 
representative. A designated representative is a commissioned, warrant, 
or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to units under the 
operational control of USCG Sector New Orleans.
    Vessels requiring entry into this safety zone would have to request 
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be 
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16 or 67 or by telephone at (504) 365-2200. 
Persons and vessels permitted to enter this safety zone must transit at 
their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions issued 
by the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are 
proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size and 
duration of the safety zone. This safety zone is for only one hour and 
fifteen minutes on a one-mile section of the waterway. Moreover, the 
Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM) via VHF-FM 
marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to 
seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies that under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary 
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do 
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This proposed rule involves a safety zone lasting one hour 
and fifteen minutes that would prohibit entry between mile marker 95.7 
and mile marker 96.7 on the Lower Mississippi River above Head of 
Passes. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further 
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction 
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental 
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information 
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact 
from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

[[Page 22227]]

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
Recordkeeping Requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0348 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T08-0348  Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, New Orleans, 
LA

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable 
waters of the Lower Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA from mile marker 
(MM) 95.7 to MM 96.7 above Head of Passes.
    (b) Effective period. This section is effective from 8:45 p.m. 
through 10 p.m. on August 25, 2018.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by 
the Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans (COTP) or designated 
representative. A designated representative is a commissioned, warrant, 
or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to units under the 
operational control of USCG Sector New Orleans.
    (2) Vessels requiring entry into this safety zone must request 
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be 
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16 or 67 or by telephone at (504) 365-2200.
    (3) Persons and vessels permitted to enter this safety zone must 
transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful 
directions issued by the COTP or the designated representative.
    (d) Information broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative 
will inform the public of the enforcement times and date for this 
safety zone through Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices 
to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Marine Safety Information Broadcasts (MSIBs) 
as appropriate.

    Dated: May 9, 2018.
Wayne R. Arguin,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2018-10188 Filed 5-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

22226 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 93 / Monday, May 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules

and these navigable waters before, small entities during rulemaking. The power and responsibilities between the
during, and after the scheduled term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Federal Government and Indian tribes.
fireworks display. No vessel or person businesses, not-for-profit organizations If you believe this proposed rule has
would be permitted to enter the safety that are independently owned and implications for federalism or Indian
zone without obtaining permission from operated and are not dominant in their tribes, please contact the person listed
the COTP or a designated fields, and governmental jurisdictions in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
representative. A designated with populations of less than 50,000. CONTACT section.
representative is a commissioned, The Coast Guard certifies that under 5
warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. U.S.C. 605(b) this proposed rule would E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Coast Guard assigned to units under the not have a significant economic impact
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
operational control of USCG Sector New on a substantial number of small
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Orleans. entities.
If you think that your business, Federal agencies to assess the effects of
Vessels requiring entry into this safety
organization, or governmental their discretionary regulatory actions. In
zone would have to request permission
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity particular, the Act addresses actions
from the COTP or a designated
and that this rule would have a that may result in the expenditure by a
representative. They may be contacted
significant economic impact on it, State, local, or tribal government, in the
on VHF–FM Channel 16 or 67 or by
telephone at (504) 365–2200. Persons please submit a comment (see aggregate, or by the private sector of
and vessels permitted to enter this ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
safety zone must transit at their slowest qualifies and how and to what degree more in any one year. Though this
safe speed and comply with all lawful this rule would economically affect it. proposed rule would not result in such
directions issued by the COTP or a Under section 213(a) of the Small an expenditure, we do discuss the
designated representative. The Business Regulatory Enforcement effects of this rule elsewhere in this
regulatory text we are proposing appears Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– preamble.
at the end of this document. 121), we want to assist small entities in F. Environment
understanding this proposed rule. If the
IV. Regulatory Analyses rule would affect your small business, We have analyzed this proposed rule
We developed this proposed rule after organization, or governmental under Department of Homeland
considering numerous statutes and jurisdiction and you have questions Security Directive 023–01 and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. concerning its provisions or options for Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
Below we summarize our analyses compliance, please contact the person which guide the Coast Guard in
based on a number of these statutes and listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION complying with the National
Executive orders and we discuss First CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
Amendment rights of protestors. not retaliate against small entities that U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
question or complain about this preliminary determination that this
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
proposed rule or any policy or action of action is one of a category of actions that
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 the Coast Guard. do not individually or cumulatively
direct agencies to assess the costs and have a significant effect on the human
benefits of available regulatory C. Collection of Information
environment. This proposed rule
alternatives and, if regulation is This proposed rule would not call for involves a safety zone lasting one hour
necessary, to select regulatory a new collection of information under and fifteen minutes that would prohibit
approaches that maximize net benefits. the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 entry between mile marker 95.7 and
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). mile marker 96.7 on the Lower
to control regulatory costs through a Mississippi River above Head of Passes.
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
budgeting process. This NPRM has not Normally such actions are categorically
Governments
been designated a ‘‘significant excluded from further review under
regulatory action,’’ under Executive A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132, paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
has not been reviewed by the Office of Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship 001–01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record
Management and Budget (OMB), and of Environmental Consideration
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of supporting this determination is
from the requirements of Executive available in the docket where indicated
Order 13771. power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have under ADDRESSES. We seek any
This regulatory action determination
analyzed this proposed rule under that comments or information that may lead
is based on the size and duration of the
Order and have determined that it is to the discovery of a significant
safety zone. This safety zone is for only
consistent with the fundamental environmental impact from this
one hour and fifteen minutes on a one-
federalism principles and preemption proposed rule.
mile section of the waterway. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a requirements described in Executive G. Protest Activities
Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM) via Order 13132.
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the Also, this proposed rule does not have The Coast Guard respects the First
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS

zone, and the rule would allow vessels tribal implications under Executive Amendment rights of protesters.
to seek permission to enter the zone. Order 13175, Consultation and Protesters are asked to contact the
Coordination with Indian Tribal person listed in the FOR FURTHER
B. Impact on Small Entities Governments, because it would not have INFORMATION CONTACT section to
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of a substantial direct effect on one or coordinate protest activities so that your
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, more Indian tribes, on the relationship message can be received without
requires Federal agencies to consider between the Federal Government and jeopardizing the safety or security of
the potential impact of regulations on Indian tribes, or on the distribution of people, places, or vessels.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 May 11, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM 14MYP1

Document Created: 2018-05-12 01:11:39
Document Modified: 2018-05-12 01:11:39

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 13, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Commander Benjamin Morgan, Sector New Orleans Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 504-365-2231, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 22225
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 22225 - Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 93 (May 14, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard