83 FR 23289 - Otay River Estuary Restoration Project, South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, California; Final Environmental Impact Statement
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 97 (May 18, 2018)
Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 97 (May 18, 2018)
| Page Range | 23289-23291 | |
| FR Document | 2018-10630 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 23289-23291] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-10630] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS-R8-R-2018-N008; FF08RSDC00-189-F1611MD-FXRS12610800000] Otay River Estuary Restoration Project, South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, California; Final Environmental Impact Statement AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability; final environmental impact statement. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the availability of a final environmental impact statement (EIS) for a proposed project to restore coastal wetlands at the south end of San Diego Bay. The Otay River Estuary Restoration Project is located within the South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in San Diego County, California. This notice advises the public that the final EIS is now available to the public. The final EIS describes the alternatives identified to restore two portions of the South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay NWR to coastal wetlands to benefit native fish, wildlife, and plant species. ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You may obtain copies of the EIS and related documents in the following places:Internet: https://www.fws.gov/refuge/San_Diego_Bay/what_we_do/Resource_Management/Otay_Restoration.html. In Person: [cir] San Diego National Wildlife Refuge Complex Headquarters, 1080 Gunpowder Point Drive, Chula Vista, CA 91910; telephone: 619-476-9150, extension 103. [cir] Chula Vista Public Library, Civic Center Branch, 365 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910; telephone: 619-691-5069. [cir] San Diego County Library, Imperial Beach Branch Library, 810 Imperial Beach Blvd. Imperial Beach, CA 91932; telephone: 619-424-6981. [cir] Chula Vista Public Library, South Chula Vista Branch, 389 Orange Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91911; telephone: 619-585-5755. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Collins, Refuge Manager, San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge at 619-575-2704, extension 302 (telephone) or brian_collins@fws.gov (email); or Andy Yuen, Project Leader, 619-476-9150, extension 100 (telephone), or andy_yuen@fws.gov (email). [[Page 23290]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: National Environmental Policy Act Compliance We are conducting environmental review for the proposed Otay River Estuary Restoration Project in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), its implementing regulations in 40 CFR 1500-1508), other applicable regulations, and our procedures for compliance with those regulations. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is participating as a cooperating agency in preparation of the EIS. On November 14, 2011, we published in the Federal Register a notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Otay project (76 FR 70480). Based on information developed after the scoping period, the proposed area of the project was expanded, so on January 8, 2013, we published a notice to reinitiate the scoping process (78 FR 1246). We announced the availability of the draft EIS for public comment on October 21, 2016 (81 FR 72817), and reopened the comment period on December 27, 2016 (81 FR 95176). In accordance with 40 CFR 1506.6, we now announce the availability of the final EIS. In addition to our publication of this notice, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is publishing a notice announcing the final EIS, as required under section 309 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). The publication date of EPA's notice of availability in the Federal Register is the start of the 30-day wait period required for the final EIS. (See EPA's Role in the EIS Process, below, for further information.) We will make a decision on the alternatives presented in the EIS no sooner than 30 days after the publication of the final EIS. We anticipate issuing a Record of Decision (ROD) in 2018. Background In 2006, we completed a comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and EIS/ROD to guide the management of the San Diego Bay NWR over a 15-year period (71 FR 64552, November 2, 2006). The wildlife and habitat management goal of the selected management alternative in the CCP for the South San Diego Bay Unit is to ``Protect, manage, enhance, and restore . . . coastal wetlands . . . to benefit the native fish, wildlife, and plant species supported within the South San Diego Bay Unit.'' One of the strategies identified to meet this goal is to restore native habitats in the Otay River floodplain and the salt ponds. On November 15, 2007, the California Coastal Commission (Commission) approved a coastal development permit (CDP No. E-06-013) for a proposal by Poseidon Resources (Channelside) LP (Poseidon) to construct and operate a desalination facility in Carlsbad, California. As part of that approval, the Commission required Poseidon, through special condition 8, to submit for additional Commission review and approval a marine life mitigation plan (MLMP) to address the impacts to be caused by the facility's use of estuarine water and its entrainment of marine organisms. The MLMP was conditionally approved by the Commission on August 6, 2008 (CCC 2008). With the incorporation of the Commission's revisions, the MLMP was finalized on November 21, 2008. The MLMP requires that Poseidon submit a proposed mitigation site and preliminary restoration plan that achieves the following mitigation requirements: Create or substantially restore tidal wetland habitat, preferably in the San Diego Region; Restore at least 66.4 acres of coastal wetland habitat as mitigation at a maximum of two sites; The chosen site must be available and protected against future degradation; and Fish productivity must be at least 1,717.5 kg/year. Project On September 29, 2010, the San Diego NWR Complex and Poseidon entered into a memorandum of understanding to establish a partnership to facilitate the restoration of property within the San Diego Bay NWR, consistent with the CCP and the Commission's permit requirements for Poseidon. The proposed restoration project represents step-down restoration planning for the western portion of the Otay River floodplain and one of the salt ponds within the Refuge's solar salt pond complex. Funding for the proposed restoration is being provided by the Poseidon Resources Carlsbad Desalination Project to fulfill part of the mitigation requirements imposed by the Commission and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the construction of a desalination plant in Carlsbad. The proposed action site is located at the south end of San Diego Bay, San Diego County, California, within the South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay NWR. Restoration activities will occur at two separate locations within the Refuge: The Otay River Floodplain Site and the Pond 15 Site. Specifically, the approximately 34-acre Otay River Floodplain Site is located west of Interstate 5 (I-5) between Main Street to the north and Palm Avenue to the south in San Diego. The Pond 15 Site consists of an approximately 91-acre active solar salt pond located in the northeast portion of the Refuge, to the northwest of the intersection of Bay Boulevard and Palomar Street in Chula Vista. Alternatives The site-specific EIS for the Otay project tiers from the 2006 programmatic EIS and ROD prepared for the Refuge CCP. We analyzed three alternatives in this final EIS: Alternative A: No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the disturbed areas within the Otay River Floodplain Site would not be restored or enhanced to coastal wetlands to benefit native species, and the Pond 15 Site would not be restored to tidally influenced subtidal and intertidal habitat. Under this alternative, Pond 15 would remain part of an existing commercial solar salt operation, and periodic maintenance to control non-native plants would continue to occur on the Otay River Floodplain Site in conjunction with ongoing management of the Refuge. Alternative B: Intertidal Alternative (Proposed Action) The Intertidal Alternative, Alternative B, is the proposed action. The proposed action would involve lowering the elevation and contouring the Otay River Floodplain Site to create approximately 29.8 acres of tidally influenced habitat, consisting of approximately 5.1 acres of intertidal mudflat and 24.7 acres of intertidal salt marsh habitat through altering elevations on the site. In addition, the restored area would include approximately 3.7 acres of upland habitat. The proposed action would also involve raising the elevation and contouring the Pond 15 Site to create approximately 10.4 acres of subtidal habitat, 18.4 acres of intertidal mudflat, 57.3 acres of intertidal salt marsh habitat, about 1 acre of high-tide refugia, and 3.9 acres of upland habitat. Both sites would be planted with a mix of native wetland vegetation that would mature into low-marsh, mid-marsh, and high-marsh vegetative communities. The intertidal areas and the unvegetated mudflat would provide foraging habitat for adult and juvenile fish, which then form the foraging base of the food chain [[Page 23291]] that would benefit larger fish, birds, and other species on and off the site. Implementation of the proposed action would involve the excavation of approximately 320,000 cubic yards of material from the Otay River Site and the transport of 260,000 cubic yards of this material to the Pond 15 Site for use in creating tidal elevations that would support the desired intertidal habitats and improving levees to separate Pond 15 from the remaining active solar salt operation. The combination of the wetlands created at the Otay River Floodplain Site and Pond 15 Site under the proposed action would provide sufficient mitigation credit to meet the MLMP requirements. Alternative C: Subtidal Alternative Alternative C, the Subtidal Alternative, would involve lowering the Otay River Floodplain Site to an elevation lower than that proposed under Alternative B (proposed action) to create a subtidal channel within the Otay River Floodplain Site. Under the Subtidal Alternative, the subtidal zone would be surrounded by mudflats and increasing elevation of salt marsh. Specifically, the Subtidal Alternative would involve lowering the elevation and contouring the Otay River Floodplain Site to create approximately 4.5 acres of subtidal habitat, approximately 6.5 acres of intertidal mudflat, 18.7 acres of intertidal salt marsh habitat, and approximately 3.7 acres of upland habitat. The Subtidal Alternative would also involve raising the elevation and contouring the Pond 15 Site to create tidally influenced habitat that would be similar to that proposed under Alternative B, with approximately 9.8 acres of subtidal habitat, 16.3 acres of intertidal mudflat, 58.7 acres of intertidal salt marsh, approximately 2.2 acres of high-tide refugia, and 4.0 acres of upland habitat. Both sites would be planted with a mix of native wetland vegetation that would mature into low-marsh, mid-marsh, and high-marsh vegetative communities. The subtidal areas would provide fish spawning and foraging habitat, and the unvegetated mudflat would provide foraging habitat for adult and juvenile fish during high tides. Combined, the subtidal and mudflat areas would provide habitat for the basis of the food chain that would benefit larger fish, birds, and other species on and off the site. Implementation of the Subtidal Alternative would involve the excavation of approximately 370,000 cubic yards of material from the Otay River Site and the transport of 312,000 cubic yards of this material to the Pond 15 Site for use in creating tidal elevations that would support the desired intertidal habitats and improving levees to separate Pond 15 from the remaining active solar salt operation. The combination of the wetlands created at the Otay River Floodplain Site and Pond 15 Site under the Subtidal Alternative would also provide sufficient mitigation credit to meet the MLMP requirements. EPA's Role in the EIS Process The EPA is charged, under section 309 of the Clean Air Act, to review all Federal agencies' EISs and to comment on the adequacy and the acceptability of the environmental impacts of proposed actions in the EISs. EPA also serves as the repository for EISs prepared by Federal agencies and provides notice of their availability in the Federal Register. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Database provides information about EISs prepared by Federal agencies, as well as EPA's comments concerning the EISs. All EISs are filed with EPA, which publishes a notice of availability on Fridays in the Federal Register. The notice of availability is the start of the 30-day ``wait period'' for final EISs, during which agencies are generally required to wait 30 days before making a decision on a proposed action. For more information, see https://www.epa.gov/nepa. You may search for EPA comments on EISs, along with EISs themselves, at https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search. Paul Souza, Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region. [FR Doc. 2018-10630 Filed 5-17-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2018 / Notices 23289
with the cumulative effects of other Public Comments DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
permitted take and additional factors
affecting eagle populations, are We invite public comment on the Fish and Wildlife Service
compatible with the preservation of bald proposed DEA. If you wish, you may
[FWS–R8–R–2018–N008; FF08RSDC00–
eagles and golden eagles. submit comments by any one of the 189–F1611MD–FXRS12610800000]
methods discussed in ADDRESSES. We
Proposed Action will consider public comments on the Otay River Estuary Restoration
The permit applicant, Northern States DEA when making the final Project, South San Diego Bay Unit of
Power Company—Minnesota, doing determination on NEPA compliance and the San Diego Bay National Wildlife
business as Xcel Energy, is operating an permit issuance. Refuge, California; Final
approximately 200.5-megatwatt Environmental Impact Statement
Public Availability of Comments
commercial wind energy facility in AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Stutsman County, North Dakota. The All comments and materials we Interior.
100-turbine project, sited entirely on receive become part of the public record ACTION: Notice of availability; final
private land, became operational on associated with this action. Before environmental impact statement.
December 1, 2016. including your address, phone number,
The applicant developed an ECP email address, or other personal SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
based on our guidance contained in the identifying information in your Wildlife Service, announce the
Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance comment, you should be aware that availability of a final environmental
Module 1: Land-Based Wind Energy your entire comment—including your impact statement (EIS) for a proposed
Version 2 (Service 2013) (ECP Guidance) personal identifying information—may project to restore coastal wetlands at the
(https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/ be made publicly available at any time. south end of San Diego Bay. The Otay
pdf/management/eagleconservation While you can ask us in your comment River Estuary Restoration Project is
planguidance.pdf). to withhold your personal identifying located within the South San Diego Bay
As recommended in the Service’s ECP information from public review, we Unit of the San Diego Bay National
Guidance, the applicant’s plan outlines Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in San Diego
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
avoidance and minimization measures, County, California. This notice advises
do so. All submissions from
contains a risk assessment, and includes the public that the final EIS is now
organizations or businesses, and from
advanced conservation practices and available to the public. The final EIS
individuals identifying themselves as describes the alternatives identified to
adaptive management. The applicant representatives or officials of
submitted the ECP as part of the permit restore two portions of the South San
organizations or businesses, and from Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay
application, and if we issue the permit, individuals identifying themselves as
then the conservation commitments NWR to coastal wetlands to benefit
representatives or officials of native fish, wildlife, and plant species.
would become conditions of the permit. organizations or businesses, will be ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You
The Service independently evaluated made available for public disclosure in may obtain copies of the EIS and related
the risk of bald eagle fatalities from their entirety. documents in the following places:
project operations and compared that • Internet: https://www.fws.gov/
risk to the conservation measures to Next Steps
refuge/San_Diego_Bay/what_we_do/
which the applicant committed. We Resource_Management/Otay_
The public process for the proposed
used our Collision Risk Model to Restoration.html.
estimate the number of annual bald Federal permit action will be completed
after the public comment period, at • In Person:
eagle fatalities resulting from operation Æ San Diego National Wildlife Refuge
and maintenance of the project. This is which time we will evaluate the permit
application and comments submitted Complex Headquarters, 1080
an essential step in the Service’s Gunpowder Point Drive, Chula Vista,
evaluation of an application for a permit thereupon to determine whether the
CA 91910; telephone: 619–476–9150,
for take of eagles because issuing criteria application meets the permitting
extension 103.
require permitted take to comply with requirements under the Eagle Act, Æ Chula Vista Public Library, Civic
the Eagle Act’s preservation standard. In applicable regulations, and NEPA Center Branch, 365 F Street, Chula
the DEA, we evaluate the risk and requirements. Upon completion of that Vista, CA 91910; telephone: 619–691–
offsetting conservation measures, and evaluation, we will select our course of 5069.
the implications for direct, indirect, and action. Æ San Diego County Library, Imperial
cumulative effects of issuing a permit Beach Branch Library, 810 Imperial
Authority
and a No Action alternative. Beach Blvd. Imperial Beach, CA 91932;
National Environmental Policy Act We provide this notice under section telephone: 619–424–6981.
Compliance 668a of the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668– Æ Chula Vista Public Library, South
668d) and the National Environmental Chula Vista Branch, 389 Orange
Our consideration of whether or not Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91911;
to issue a 5-year ETP is an action subject seq.) and its implementing regulations telephone: 619–585–5755.
to the National Environmental Policy (40 CFR 1506.6 and 43 CFR 46.300). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Act (NEPA). Our DEA analyzes the risk Brian Collins, Refuge Manager, San
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
of bald eagle take associated with Matt Hogan, Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge at
operation and maintenance of the Deputy Regional Director, USFWS Mountain- 619–575–2704, extension 302
project, and assesses the potential Prairie Region, Lakewood, Colorado. (telephone) or brian_collins@fws.gov
effects of permit issuance and a No [FR Doc. 2018–10629 Filed 5–17–18; 8:45 am] (email); or Andy Yuen, Project Leader,
Action alternative (i.e., do not issue an BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 619–476–9150, extension 100
ETP) on the human and natural (telephone), or andy_yuen@fws.gov
environment. (email).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:38 May 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM 18MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_23386/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2018 / Notices 23291
that would benefit larger fish, birds, and cubic yards of this material to the Pond sections 10(a)(1)(A) and 10(a)(1)(B) of
other species on and off the site. 15 Site for use in creating tidal the ESA. With some exceptions, the
Implementation of the proposed elevations that would support the ESA prohibits take of listed species
action would involve the excavation of desired intertidal habitats and unless a Federal permit is issued that
approximately 320,000 cubic yards of improving levees to separate Pond 15 authorizes the taking or is exempted
material from the Otay River Site and from the remaining active solar salt through section 7 of the ESA. Under
the transport of 260,000 cubic yards of operation. section 10(a)(1)(A), we issue
this material to the Pond 15 Site for use The combination of the wetlands enhancement of survival permits in
in creating tidal elevations that would created at the Otay River Floodplain conjunction with candidate
support the desired intertidal habitats Site and Pond 15 Site under the conservation agreements with
and improving levees to separate Pond Subtidal Alternative would also provide assurances (CCAA) and safe harbor
15 from the remaining active solar salt sufficient mitigation credit to meet the agreements (SHA). Section 10(a)(1)(A)
operation. MLMP requirements. also authorizes recovery permits, but
The combination of the wetlands this notice is limited to permits issued
created at the Otay River Floodplain EPA’s Role in the EIS Process
with CCAAs and SHAs; issued recovery
Site and Pond 15 Site under the The EPA is charged, under section permits will be summarized in a
proposed action would provide 309 of the Clean Air Act, to review all separate notice. Section 10(a)(1)(B)
sufficient mitigation credit to meet the Federal agencies’ EISs and to comment permits authorize take of endangered
MLMP requirements. on the adequacy and the acceptability of and threatened species incidental to
the environmental impacts of proposed otherwise lawful activities associated
Alternative C: Subtidal Alternative
actions in the EISs. with habitat conservation plans. We
Alternative C, the Subtidal EPA also serves as the repository for provide this list to the public as a
Alternative, would involve lowering the EISs prepared by Federal agencies and summary of our permit issuances for
Otay River Floodplain Site to an provides notice of their availability in calendar year 2017.
elevation lower than that proposed the Federal Register. The
under Alternative B (proposed action) to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
create a subtidal channel within the Database provides information about general information about the ESA
Otay River Floodplain Site. Under the EISs prepared by Federal agencies, as permit process, contact Karen
Subtidal Alternative, the subtidal zone well as EPA’s comments concerning the Anderson, 703–358–2301, karen_
would be surrounded by mudflats and EISs. All EISs are filed with EPA, which anderson@fws.gov. For information on
increasing elevation of salt marsh. publishes a notice of availability on specific permits, see the contact
Specifically, the Subtidal Alternative Fridays in the Federal Register. information below in Permits Issued.
would involve lowering the elevation The notice of availability is the start SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and contouring the Otay River of the 30-day ‘‘wait period’’ for final Background
Floodplain Site to create approximately EISs, during which agencies are
4.5 acres of subtidal habitat, generally required to wait 30 days Under the authority of section
approximately 6.5 acres of intertidal before making a decision on a proposed 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species
mudflat, 18.7 acres of intertidal salt action. For more information, see Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.;
marsh habitat, and approximately 3.7 https://www.epa.gov/nepa. You may ESA), we have issued permits to
acres of upland habitat. The Subtidal search for EPA comments on EISs, along conduct activities that provide a
Alternative would also involve raising with EISs themselves, at https:// conservation benefit for endangered or
the elevation and contouring the Pond cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/ threatened species, or for unlisted
15 Site to create tidally influenced action/eis/search. species should they become listed in the
habitat that would be similar to that future, in response to permit
proposed under Alternative B, with Paul Souza, applications that we received in
approximately 9.8 acres of subtidal Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region. conjunction with a CCAA or SHA.
habitat, 16.3 acres of intertidal mudflat, [FR Doc. 2018–10630 Filed 5–17–18; 8:45 am] Under section 10(a)(1)(B), we may
58.7 acres of intertidal salt marsh, BILLING CODE 4333–15–P issue permits for any taking otherwise
approximately 2.2 acres of high-tide prohibited by section 9 if such taking is
refugia, and 4.0 acres of upland habitat. incidental to, and not the purpose of,
Both sites would be planted with a mix DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR carrying out an otherwise lawful activity
of native wetland vegetation that would (known as an incidental take permit
mature into low-marsh, mid-marsh, and Fish and Wildlife Service (ITP)) and the permit applicant submits
high-marsh vegetative communities. [FWS–HQ–ES–2018–N063; FF09E42000 178 a habitat conservation plan (HCP) that
The subtidal areas would provide fish FXES11130900000] meets the permit issuance criteria under
spawning and foraging habitat, and the section 10(a)(2)(B). Typically, applicants
unvegetated mudflat would provide Endangered and Threatened Species; seek an ITP to conduct activities such as
foraging habitat for adult and juvenile Issuance of Enhancement of Survival residential and commercial
fish during high tides. Combined, the and Incidental Take Permits January 2, development, infrastructure
subtidal and mudflat areas would 2017 Through December 29, 2017 development or maintenance, and
provide habitat for the basis of the food AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, energy development projects that range
chain that would benefit larger fish, Interior. in scale from small to landscape-level
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
birds, and other species on and off the ACTION: Notice. planning efforts.
site. We issued the permits listed below
Implementation of the Subtidal SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and between January 17 and December 27,
Alternative would involve the Wildlife Service, in accordance with 2017. Under section 10(a)(1)(A), we
excavation of approximately 370,000 section 10(d) of the Endangered Species issued each permit only after we
cubic yards of material from the Otay Act (ESA) as amended, provide a list to determined that it was applied for in
River Site and the transport of 312,000 the public of the permits issued under good faith, that granting the permit
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:38 May 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM 18MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_23386/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-05-18 02:16:00
Document Modified: 2018-05-18 02:16:00
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of availability; final environmental impact statement. | |
| Contact | Brian Collins, Refuge Manager, San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge at 619-575-2704, extension 302 (telephone) or [email protected] (email); or Andy Yuen, Project Leader, 619-476-9150, extension 100 (telephone), or [email protected] (email). | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 23289 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR