83 FR 23617 - Safety Zone; Marshwalk Group Independence Day Fireworks, Murrells Inlet, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 99 (May 22, 2018)

Page Range		23617-23619
FR Document		2018-10931

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone for certain waters of Murrells Inlet, SC. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of the general public, spectators, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards during a fireworks display. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP) or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23617-23619]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0203]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Marshwalk Group Independence Day Fireworks, Murrells 
Inlet, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone 
for certain waters of Murrells Inlet, SC. This action is necessary to 
provide for the safety of the general public, spectators, vessels, and 
the marine environment from potential hazards during a fireworks 
display. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels 
from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within 
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston 
(COTP) or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this 
proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before June 21, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0145 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector 
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 
740-3184, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On March 3, 2018, the Marsh Walk Group notified the Coast Guard 
that it would be conducting a fireworks display from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. 
on July 4, 2018. The fireworks are to be launched from the end of the 
Veterans Fishing Pier in Murrells Inlet, SC. Hazards from firework 
displays include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous 
projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the 
Port Charleston (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated 
with the fireworks to be used in this display would be a safety concern 
for anyone within a 500-yard radius of the pier.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels 
and the navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of the pier before, 
during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this 
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 8:45 p.m. to 
10:15 p.m. on July 4, 2018. The safety zone would cover all navigable 
waters within 500-yards of the Veterans Fishing Pier located at 
Murrells Inlet, SC. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the 
safety of life on these navigable waters before, during, and after the 
scheduled 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. fireworks display. No person or vessel 
would be permitted to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain 
within the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a 
designated representative. The Coast Guard would provide notice of the 
safety zone by local notice to mariners, broadcast notice to mariners, 
and on-scene designated representatives. The regulatory text we are 
proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM

[[Page 23618]]

has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and 
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of 
Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. The safety zone 
will only be enforced for a total of an hour and a half, and although 
persons and vessels may not enter, transit through, anchor in, or 
remain within the safety zone without authorization from the COTP or a 
designated representative, vessel traffic would be able to safely 
operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period and the 
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone. 
Moreover, the Coast Guard would provide advance notification of the 
safety zone to the local maritime community by local notice to mariners 
and broadcast notice to mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    We have considered the impact of this proposed rule on small 
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which 
may be small entities: The owner or operators of vessels intending to 
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area 
during the enforcement period. For the reasons stated in section IV.A. 
above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety 
zone lasting an hour and a half that would prohibit entry within 500-
yards of a pier from which fireworks are being launched. Normally such 
actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 
L 60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, 
Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting 
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed 
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted

[[Page 23619]]

without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.T07-0203 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-0203   Safety Zone; Marshwalk Group Independence Day 
Fireworks, Murrells Inlet, SC.

    (a) Location. The following is a safety zone: Certain waters of the 
Atlantic Ocean at Murrells Inlet, South Carolina within a 500-yard 
radius of Veterans Fishing Pier.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast 
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty 
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and 
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated 
areas.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from 
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the 
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston 
or a designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor 
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the 
Port Charleston by telephone at 843-740-7050, or a designated 
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. 
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within 
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or 
a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such 
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the 
Port Charleston or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by 
local notice to mariners, broadcast notice to mariners, and on-scene 
designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced on July 4, 2018 
from 8:45 p.m. until 10.15 p.m.

    Dated: May 16, 2018.
J.W. Reed,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2018-10931 Filed 5-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules 23617

§ 165.T07–0145 Safety Zone; Fourth of DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND would be conducting a fireworks
July Fireworks Patriots Point, Charleston, SECURITY display from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July
SC. 4, 2018. The fireworks are to be
(a) Location. This rule establishes a Coast Guard launched from the end of the Veterans
safety zone on all waters within a 500- Fishing Pier in Murrells Inlet, SC.
33 CFR Part 165 Hazards from firework displays include
yard radius of the barge, from which
accidental discharge of fireworks,
fireworks will be launched along the [Docket Number USCG–2018–0203]
dangerous projectiles, and falling hot
bank of the Cooper River at Patriots RIN 1625–AA00 embers or other debris. The Captain of
Point in Charleston, SC. the Port Charleston (COTP) has
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated Safety Zone; Marshwalk Group determined that potential hazards
representative’’ means Coast Guard Independence Day Fireworks, Murrells associated with the fireworks to be used
Patrol Commanders, including Coast Inlet, SC in this display would be a safety
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. concern for anyone within a 500-yard
other officers operating Coast Guard radius of the pier.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. The purpose of this rulemaking is to
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to ensure the safety of vessels and the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the establish a temporary safety zone for navigable waters within a 500-yard
enforcement of the regulated areas. certain waters of Murrells Inlet, SC. This radius of the pier before, during, and
action is necessary to provide for the after the scheduled event. The Coast
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and Guard proposes this rulemaking under
vessels are prohibited from entering, safety of the general public, spectators,
vessels, and the marine environment authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
transiting through, anchoring in, or
from potential hazards during a III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
remaining within the regulated area
fireworks display. This proposed
unless authorized by the Captain of the The COTP proposes to establish a
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
Port Charleston or a designated safety zone from 8:45 p.m. to 10:15 p.m.
vessels from entering, transiting
representative. on July 4, 2018. The safety zone would
through, anchoring in, or remaining
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to cover all navigable waters within 500-
within the safety zone unless authorized
yards of the Veterans Fishing Pier
enter, transit through, anchor in, or by the Captain of the Port Charleston
located at Murrells Inlet, SC. The
remain within the regulated area may (COTP) or a designated representative.
duration of the zone is intended to
contact the Captain of the Port We invite your comments on this
ensure the safety of life on these
Charleston by telephone at 843–740– proposed rulemaking.
navigable waters before, during, and
7050, or a designated representative via DATES: Comments and related material after the scheduled 9 p.m. to 10 p.m.
VHF radio on channel 16, to request must be received by the Coast Guard on fireworks display. No person or vessel
authorization. If authorization to enter, or before June 21, 2018. would be permitted to enter, transit
transit through, anchor in, or remain ADDRESSES: You may submit comments through, anchor in, or remain within the
within the regulated area is granted by identified by docket number USCG– safety zone without obtaining
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 2018–0145 using the Federal permission from the COTP or a
designated representative, all persons eRulemaking Portal at http:// designated representative. The Coast
and vessels receiving such authorization www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public Guard would provide notice of the
must comply with the instructions of Participation and Request for safety zone by local notice to mariners,
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a Comments’’ portion of the broadcast notice to mariners, and on-
designated representative. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for scene designated representatives. The
further instructions on submitting regulatory text we are proposing appears
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
comments. at the end of this document.
notice of the regulated area by local
notice to mariners, broadcast notice to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If IV. Regulatory Analyses
mariners, and on-scene designated you have questions about this proposed
We developed this proposed rule after
representatives. rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
considering numerous statutes and
Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Office of
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule will Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
be enforced on July 4, 2018 from 8:15 Below we summarize our analyses
telephone (843) 740–3184, email
p.m. until 9:45 p.m. based on a number of these statutes and
Justin.C.Heck@uscg.mil.
Executive Orders and we discuss First
Dated: May 16, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Amendment rights of protestors.
J.W. Reed,
I. Table of Abbreviations A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Charleston. CFR Code of Federal Regulations Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
[FR Doc. 2018–10930 Filed 5–21–18; 8:45 am]
DHS Department of Homeland Security direct agencies to assess the costs and
FR Federal Register benefits of available regulatory
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
alternatives and, if regulation is
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1

§ Section necessary, to select regulatory
U.S.C. United States Code approaches that maximize net benefits.
COTP Captain of the Port Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal budgeting process. This NPRM has not
Basis been designated a ‘‘significant
On March 3, 2018, the Marsh Walk regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Group notified the Coast Guard that it Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 21, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM 22MYP1

23618 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules

has not been reviewed by the Office of rule would affect your small business, F. Environment
Management and Budget (OMB), and organization, or governmental We have analyzed this proposed rule
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt jurisdiction and you have questions under Department of Homeland
from the requirements of Executive concerning its provisions or options for Security Management Directive 023–01
Order 13771. compliance, please contact the person and Commandant Instruction
This regulatory action determination listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
is based on the size, location, duration, CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will Guard in complying with the National
and time-of-day of the safety zone. The not retaliate against small entities that Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
safety zone will only be enforced for a question or complain about this
total of an hour and a half, and although U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
proposed rule or any policy or action of preliminary determination that this
persons and vessels may not enter, the Coast Guard.
transit through, anchor in, or remain action is one of a category of actions that
within the safety zone without C. Collection of Information do not individually or cumulatively
authorization from the COTP or a have a significant effect on the human
designated representative, vessel traffic This proposed rule would not call for environment. This proposed rule
would be able to safely operate in the a new collection of information under involves a safety zone lasting an hour
surrounding area during the the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and a half that would prohibit entry
enforcement period and the rule would (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). within 500-yards of a pier from which
allow vessels to seek permission to enter fireworks are being launched. Normally
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal such actions are categorically excluded
the zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard Governments
would provide advance notification of from further review under paragraph L
the safety zone to the local maritime 60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
A rule has implications for federalism
community by local notice to mariners Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
under Executive Order 13132,
and broadcast notice to mariners via Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
VHF–FM marine channel 16. Environmental Consideration
effect on the States, on the relationship
supporting this determination is
B. Impact on Small Entities between the national government and available in the docket where indicated
the States, or on the distribution of under ADDRESSES. We seek any
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
power and responsibilities among the comments or information that may lead
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
various levels of government. We have to the discovery of a significant
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on analyzed this proposed rule under that environmental impact from this
small entities during rulemaking. The Order and have determined that it is proposed rule.
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption G. Protest Activities
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and requirements described in Executive The Coast Guard respects the First
operated and are not dominant in their Order 13132. Amendment rights of protesters.
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Also, this proposed rule does not have Protesters are asked to contact the
with populations of less than 50,000. tribal implications under Executive person listed in the FOR FURTHER
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Order 13175, Consultation and INFORMATION CONTACT section to
605(b) that this proposed rule would not Coordination with Indian Tribal coordinate protest activities so that your
have a significant economic impact on Governments, because it would not have message can be received without
a substantial number of small entities. a substantial direct effect on one or jeopardizing the safety or security of
We have considered the impact of this more Indian tribes, on the relationship people, places, or vessels.
proposed rule on small entities. This between the Federal Government and V. Public Participation and Request for
rule may affect the following entities, Indian tribes, or on the distribution of Comments
some of which may be small entities: power and responsibilities between the
The owner or operators of vessels We view public participation as
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
intending to enter, transit through, essential to effective rulemaking, and
If you believe this proposed rule has
anchor in, or remain within the will consider all comments and material
implications for federalism or Indian
regulated area during the enforcement received during the comment period.
tribes, please contact the person listed
period. For the reasons stated in section Your comment can help shape the
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
IV.A. above, this proposed rule would outcome of this rulemaking. If you
CONTACT section.
not have a significant economic impact submit a comment, please include the
on a substantial number of small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act docket number for this rulemaking,
entities. indicate the specific section of this
If you think that your business, The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act document to which each comment
organization, or governmental of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires applies, and provide a reason for each
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity Federal agencies to assess the effects of suggestion or recommendation.
and that this rule would have a their discretionary regulatory actions. In We encourage you to submit
significant economic impact on it, particular, the Act addresses actions comments through the Federal
please submit a comment (see that may result in the expenditure by a eRulemaking Portal at http://
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it State, local, or tribal government, in the www.regulations.gov. If your material
qualifies and how and to what degree aggregate, or by the private sector of cannot be submitted using http://
this rule would economically affect it. $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or www.regulations.gov, contact the person
Under section 213(a) of the Small more in any one year. Though this in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Business Regulatory Enforcement proposed rule would not result in such CONTACT section of this document for
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), an expenditure, we do discuss the alternate instructions.
we want to assist small entities in effects of this rule elsewhere in this We accept anonymous comments. All
understanding this proposed rule. If the preamble. comments received will be posted

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 21, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM 22MYP1

Document Created: 2018-11-02 11:09:50
Document Modified: 2018-11-02 11:09:50

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 21, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 23617
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 23617 - Safety Zone; Marshwalk Group Independence Day Fireworks, Murrells Inlet, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 99 (May 22, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard