83 FR 27754 - Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 115 (June 14, 2018)

Page Range		27754-27755
FR Document		2018-12771

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V. (Deacero) and exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar from Mexico did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27754-27755]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12771]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-844]

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Deacero
S.A.P.I de C.V. (Deacero) and exporters of steel concrete reinforcing
bar from Mexico did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value during the period of review (POR) November 1, 2015,
through October 31, 2016.

DATES: Applicable June 14, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482-3692.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative
review on December 6, 2017.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment
on the Preliminary Results. On January 8, 2018, Commerce received a
timely filed case brief from the Petitioner,\2\ and on January 11,
2018, Commerce received a timely filed rebuttal brief from Deacero.\3\
On February 8, 2018, Commerce officials met with counsel for the
Petitioner.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 57581 (December 6,
2017) (Preliminary Results).
\2\ Petitioner is the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its
individual members. The individual members are Nucor Corporation,
Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Commercials Metals Company, Cascade
Steel Rolling Mills, Inc., and Byer Steel Group, Inc.
\3\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar
from Mexico: Case Brief and Request for Hearing'' (Petitioner Case
Brief), dated January 5, 2018; Deacero's Letter, ``Steel Concrete
Reinforcins from Mexico--Rebuttal Brief'' (Deacero Rebuttal Brief),
dated January 10, 2018.
\4\ See Memorandum to the File, ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar
from Mexico: Ex-Parte Meeting,'' dated February 9, 2018, and
Memorandum to the File, ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from
Mexico: Hearing,'' dated May 7, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On January 23, 2018, Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all
deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government from
January 20 through 22, 2018.\5\ On March 22, 2018, Commerce extended
the deadline for these final results. The revised deadline for the
final results of this review is now June 7, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23,
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been
extended by 3 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

Imports covered by the order are shipments of steel concrete
reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar)
regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade. The merchandise
subject to review is currently classifiable under items 7213.10.0000,
7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may also enter
under other Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
numbers including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017,
7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057,
7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6085, 7228.20.1000,
and 7228.60.6000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\6\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the
``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico;
2015-2016,'' from James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary Taverman,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated
concurrently with this notice (Final Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duty Absorption

As noted in the Preliminary Results, Commerce applied facts
available and an adverse inference pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b)
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) and found that duty absorption
exists on all U.S. sales of the subject merchandise exported by
Deacero. Commerce's position on this issue remains unchanged in these
final results of administrative review.

Final Determination of No Shipments

As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received no-shipment claims
from Grupo Simec \7\ and ArcelorMittal,\8\ companies named in the
Initiation Notice, and we confirmed the claims with U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP). Following publication of the Preliminary
Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding
these companies. As a result, and because the record contains no
evidence to the contrary, we continue to find that Grupo Simec and
ArcelorMittal made no shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent
with Commerce's practice, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise
produced by these two companies, but exported by other parties, at the
rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others
rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ Grupo Simec and Orge S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Grupo
Simec).
\8\ ArcelorMittal Lazaro Cardenas, SA. de CV. (which became
ArcelorMittal Mexico, S.A, de CV. on March 31, 2014), ArcelorMittal
Celaya, SA. de CV., and ArcelorMittal Cordoba, SA. de CV.
(collectively, ArcelorMittal).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 27755]]

Analysis of Comments Received

All issues raised in the case and rebuttal brief by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we
responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records
Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical
in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made no
changes to Deacero's final rate calculations. For a discussion of these
issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of the Review

As a result of this review, we calculated a dumping margin of zero
percent for Deacero. We are applying to the non-selected companies the
rate calculated for Deacero, the sole mandatory respondent in these
final results for the period November 1, 2015, through October 31,
2016:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer and/or exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V..................................... 0.00
Industrias CH............................................... 0.00
Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V................................. 0.00
Cia Siderurgica De California, S.A. de C.V.................. 0.00
Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V................................... 0.00
AceroMex S.A................................................ 0.00
Siderurgica Tultitlan S.A. de C.V........................... 0.00
Talleres y Aceros, S.A. de C.V.............................. 0.00
Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V................................. 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

We will disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Duty Assessment

Commerce shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\9\ For
Deacero, because its weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), Commerce has not calculated
importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to
antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis. Because we calculated a zero
margin for Deacero in the final results of this review, we intend to
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate
calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in
Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 41 days
after publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents
noted above will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to
be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the
most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of
the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to be 20.58 percent, the all-
others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\11\ These
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15,
2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

Dated: June 7, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Duty Absorption
VI. Final Determination of No Shipments
VII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether a Particular Market Situation Exists
Regarding Deacero's Purchase of Electricity
Comment 2: Treatment of Non-Prime Merchandise Reported by
Deacero
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-12771 Filed 6-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

27754 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Notices

conversion to judicial protective order is DATES: Applicable June 14, 2018. may also enter under other Harmonized
hereby requested. Failure to comply FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tariff Schedule of the United States
with the regulations and terms of an Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations, (HTSUS) numbers including
APO is a sanctionable violation. Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000,
We are issuing and publishing these U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018,
final results in accordance with sections Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045,
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3692. 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057,
Dated: June 8, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001,
Gary Taverman, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6085,
Background 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations Commerce published the Preliminary Although the HTSUS subheadings are
performing the non-exclusive functions and Results of this administrative review on provided for convenience and customs
duties of the Assistant Secretary for December 6, 2017.1 We invited purposes, the written description of the
Enforcement and Compliance. interested parties to comment on the merchandise subject to the order is
Appendix I Preliminary Results. On January 8, 2018, dispositive.6
Commerce received a timely filed case
List of Topics Discussed in the Final brief from the Petitioner,2 and on Duty Absorption
Decision Memorandum January 11, 2018, Commerce received a As noted in the Preliminary Results,
I. Summary timely filed rebuttal brief from Deacero.3
II. Background Commerce applied facts available and
On February 8, 2018, Commerce an adverse inference pursuant to
III. List of Interested Party Comments officials met with counsel for the
IV. Scope of the Order sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act
Petitioner.4 of 1930 (the Act) and found that duty
V. Partial Rescission of Administrative
On January 23, 2018, Commerce
Review absorption exists on all U.S. sales of the
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information exercised its discretion to toll all
subject merchandise exported by
VII. Discount Rates deadlines affected by the closure of the
Deacero. Commerce’s position on this
VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Federal Government from January 20
issue remains unchanged in these final
Adverse Facts Available and through 22, 2018.5 On March 22, 2018,
Corroboration of Secondary Information Commerce extended the deadline for results of administrative review.
IX. Programs Determined to Be these final results. The revised deadline Final Determination of No Shipments
Countervailable for the final results of this review is now
X. Programs Determined Not to Be Used June 7, 2018. As noted in the Preliminary Results,
XI. Ad Valorem Rate for Non-Selected we received no-shipment claims from
Companies Under Review Scope of the Order Grupo Simec 7 and ArcelorMittal,8
XII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Electricity for LTAR—
Imports covered by the order are companies named in the Initiation
Application of Adverse Facts Available shipments of steel concrete reinforcing Notice, and we confirmed the claims
Comment 2: Electricity for LTAR— bar imported in either straight length or with U.S. Customs and Border
Calculation Methodology coil form (rebar) regardless of Protection (CBP). Following publication
Comment 3: Countervailability of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade. of the Preliminary Results, we received
Allowance for Attorney’s Fees Program The merchandise subject to review is no comments from interested parties
Comment 4: Whether To Assign Non- currently classifiable under items regarding these companies. As a result,
Selected Company Rate to Dun Hua Sen 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and and because the record contains no
Tai Wood 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise
XIII. Conclusion
evidence to the contrary, we continue to
find that Grupo Simec and
[FR Doc. 2018–12772 Filed 6–13–18; 8:45 am] 1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico:
ArcelorMittal made no shipments
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary
during the POR. Accordingly, consistent
Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, 82 FR with Commerce’s practice, we will
57581 (December 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results). instruct U.S. Customs and Border
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 2 Petitioner is the Rebar Trade Action Coalition
Protection (CBP) to liquidate any
and its individual members. The individual
International Trade Administration members are Nucor Corporation, Gerdau Ameristeel
existing entries of merchandise
U.S. Inc., Commercials Metals Company, Cascade produced by these two companies, but
[A–201–844] Steel Rolling Mills, Inc., and Byer Steel Group, Inc. exported by other parties, at the rate for
3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete
the intermediate reseller, if available, or
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Case Brief and at the all-others rate.
Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Request for Hearing’’ (Petitioner Case Brief), dated
Duty Administrative Review; 2015– January 5, 2018; Deacero’s Letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete 6 For a full description of the scope of the order,
Reinforcins from Mexico—Rebuttal Brief’’ (Deacero
2016 Rebuttal Brief), dated January 10, 2018.
see the ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
4 See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Steel Concrete
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Review: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from
Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Ex-Parte Meeting,’’
International Trade Administration, dated February 9, 2018, and Memorandum to the
Mexico; 2015–2016,’’ from James Maeder, Deputy
Department of Commerce. Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
File, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico:
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary Taverman,
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Hearing,’’ dated May 7, 2018.
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
5 See Memorandum for The Record from
(Commerce) determines that Deacero Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
S.A.P.I de C.V. (Deacero) and exporters Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non-
(Final Decision Memorandum).
of steel concrete reinforcing bar from exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant
7 Grupo Simec and Orge S.A. de C.V.

Mexico did not make sales of subject Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, (collectively, Grupo Simec).
8 ArcelorMittal Lazaro Cardenas, SA. de CV.
merchandise at less than normal value ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), (which became ArcelorMittal Mexico, S.A, de CV.
during the period of review (POR) dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this on March 31, 2014), ArcelorMittal Celaya, SA. de
November 1, 2015, through October 31, segment of the proceeding have been extended by CV., and ArcelorMittal Cordoba, SA. de CV.
2016. 3 days. (collectively, ArcelorMittal).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:38 Jun 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Notices 27755

Analysis of Comments Received Duty Assessment deposit requirements, when imposed,
All issues raised in the case and Commerce shall determine and shall remain in effect until further
rebuttal brief by parties to this Customs and Border Protection (CBP) notice.
administrative review are addressed in shall assess antidumping duties on all Notification to Importers Regarding the
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. appropriate entries.9 For Deacero, Reimbursement of Duties
A list of the issues that parties raised because its weighted-average dumping This notice also serves as a final
and to which we responded is attached margin is zero or de minimis (i.e., less reminder to importers of their
to this notice as an Appendix. The than 0.5 percent), Commerce has not responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a calculated importer-specific to file a certificate regarding the
public document and is on-file antidumping duty assessment rates. reimbursement of antidumping duties
electronically via Enforcement and Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we prior to liquidation of the relevant
Compliance’s Antidumping and will instruct CBP to liquidate without entries during the POR. Failure to
Countervailing Duty Centralized regard to antidumping duties any comply with this requirement could
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). entries for which the importer-specific result in Commerce’s presumption that
ACCESS is available to registered users assessment rate is zero or de minimis. reimbursement of antidumping duties
at https://access.trade.gov and in the Because we calculated a zero margin for occurred and the subsequent assessment
Central Records Unit (CRU), Room Deacero in the final results of this of doubled antidumping duties.
B8024 of the main Department of review, we intend to instruct CBP to
Commerce building. In addition, a liquidate the appropriate entries Administrative Protective Order
complete version of the Issues and without regard to antidumping duties.10 This notice also serves as a reminder
Decision Memorandum can be accessed We intend to issue assessment to parties subject to administrative
directly on the internet at http:// instructions directly to CBP 41 days protective orders (APO) of their
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. after publication of the final results of responsibility concerning the return or
The signed Issues and Decision this review. destruction of proprietary information
Memorandum and the electronic disclosed under APO in accordance
versions of the Issues and Decision Cash Deposit Requirements
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
Memorandum are identical in content. The following cash deposit continues to govern business
requirements will be effective upon proprietary information in this segment
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
publication of the notice of final results of the proceeding. Timely written
Based on a review of the record and of administrative review for all notification of the return/destruction of
comments received from interested shipments of subject merchandise APO materials, or conversion to judicial
parties regarding our Preliminary entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, protective order, is hereby requested.
Results, we made no changes to for consumption on or after the Failure to comply with the regulations
Deacero’s final rate calculations. For a publication of the final results of this and the terms of an APO is a
discussion of these issues, see the Issues administrative review, as provided by
sanctionable violation.
and Decision Memorandum. section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The We are issuing and publishing this
Final Results of the Review cash deposit rate for respondents noted notice in accordance with sections
above will be zero; (2) for merchandise 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
As a result of this review, we exported by producers or exporters not
calculated a dumping margin of zero CFR 351.213(h) and 19 CFR
covered in this administrative review 351.221(b)(5).
percent for Deacero. We are applying to but covered in a prior segment of the
the non-selected companies the rate Dated: June 7, 2018.
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
calculated for Deacero, the sole continue to be the company-specific rate Gary Taverman,
mandatory respondent in these final published for the most recently Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
results for the period November 1, 2015, completed segment of this proceeding; and Countervailing Duty Operations,
through October 31, 2016: performing the non-exclusive functions and
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered duties of the Assistant Secretary for
in this review, a prior review, or the Enforcement and Compliance.
Weighted-
average original investigation, but the producer
Producer and/or exporter dumping is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate Appendix
margin established for the most recently List of Topics Discussed in the Final
(percent) completed segment of this proceeding Decision Memorandum
Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V ............ 0.00
for the producer of the subject I. Summary
Industrias CH .............................. 0.00 merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit II. List of Comments
Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V ..... 0.00 rate for all other producers or exporters III. Background
Cia Siderurgica De California, will continue to be 20.58 percent, the IV. Scope of the Order
S.A. de C.V ............................. 0.00 all-others rate established in the V. Duty Absorption
Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V ........ 0.00 antidumping investigation.11 These cash VI. Final Determination of No Shipments
AceroMex S.A ............................. 0.00 VII. Analysis of Comments
Siderurgica Tultitlan S.A. de C.V 0.00 9 In these final results, Commerce applied the
Comment 1: Whether a Particular Market
Talleres y Aceros, S.A. de C.V .. 0.00 assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Situation Exists Regarding Deacero’s
Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V ...... 0.00 Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Purchase of Electricity
Comment 2: Treatment of Non-Prime
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Merchandise Reported by Deacero
Disclosure Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 VIII. Recommendation
We will disclose the calculations (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
[FR Doc. 2018–12771 Filed 6–13–18; 8:45 am]
Reviews).
performed to parties in this proceeding 10 Id. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
within five days of the date of 11 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from
publication of this notice, in accordance Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15,
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of 2014).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:38 Jun 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1

Document Created: 2018-06-14 01:39:25
Document Modified: 2018-06-14 01:39:25

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Dates		Applicable June 14, 2018.
Contact		Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3692.
FR Citation		83 FR 27754

83 FR 27754 - Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 115 (June 14, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration