83 FR 27933 - Production or Disclosure of Material or Information
POSTAL SERVICE Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 116 (June 15, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 116 (June 15, 2018)
| Page Range | 27933-27936 | |
| FR Document | 2018-12858 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 27933-27936] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-12858] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- POSTAL SERVICE 39 CFR Parts 265 and 266 Production or Disclosure of Material or Information AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Postal Service proposes to amend its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act regulations. These changes would improve clarity, make technical corrections, and create a definition of ``information of a commercial nature'' as it pertains to the Postal Reorganization Act's provisions concerning disclosure of information under the Freedom of Information Act. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 16, 2018. ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written comments to: Associate General Counsel and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Room 6000, Washington, DC 20260-1135. Email and faxed comments are not accepted. You may inspect and photocopy all written comments, by appointment only, at USPS[reg] Headquarters Library, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, 11th Floor North, Washington, DC 20260. These records are available for review on Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.-4 p.m., by calling 202-268- 2904. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth B. Stevenson, Attorney, Federal Compliance, ruth.b.stevenson@usps.gov, 202-268-6627. [[Page 27934]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal Service proposes to amend 39 CFR part 265 to make technical corrections to conform to the FOIA and to establish a definition of information of a commercial nature. The amendments to Sections 265.1 and 265.3 correct citations. The amendment to Section 265.6 adds paragraph (e)(2) so as to conform to the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. (130 Stat. 544). The amendment to Section 265.9 eliminates an internal cross reference to the CFR by stating the dollar amount to be charged by Postal Service personnel when reviewing records in response to a FOIA request. The amendments to Section 265.14 establish a definition of ``information of a commercial nature'' to comply with applicable case law and to provide examples of the type of information that may be commercial in nature. Section 265.14 is further amended to clarify that the Postal Service will release change of address information submitted by a business. It is further amended to limit the disclosure of change of address information submitted by domestic violence shelters. Finally, the Postal Service proposes to amend 39 CFR part 266 to conform with Privacy Act provisions pertaining to disclosure of information and to define a court of competent jurisdiction. List of Subjects 39 CFR Part 265 Administrative practice and procedure, Courts, Freedom of information, Government employees. 39 CFR Part 266 Privacy. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Postal Service proposes to amend 39 CFR chapter I as follows: PART 265--PRODUCTION OR DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL OR INFORMATION 0 1. The authority citation for part 265 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. App. 3; 39 U.S.C. 401, 403, 410, 1001, 2601; Pub. L. 114-185. 0 2. Amend Sec. 265.1 to revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: Sec. 265.1 General provisions. (a) * * * (1) This subpart contains the regulations that implement the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, insofar as the Act applies to the Postal Service. These rules should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Guidelines). The Postal Service FOIA Requester's Guide, an easy-to-read guide for making Postal Service FOIA requests, is available at http://about.usps.com/who-we-are/foia/welcome.htm. * * * * * 0 3. Amend Sec. 265.3 to revise paragraphs (d) and (e) to read as follows: Sec. 265.3 Procedure for submitting a FOIA request. * * * * * (d) First-party requests. A requester who is making a request for records about himself must provide verification of identity sufficient to satisfy the component as to his identity prior to release of the record. For Privacy Act-protected records, the requester must further comply with the procedures set forth in 39 CFR 266.5. (e) Third-party requests. Where a FOIA request seeks disclosure of records that pertain to a third party, a requester may receive greater access by submitting a written authorization signed by that individual authorizing disclosure of the records to the requester, or by submitting proof that the individual is deceased (e.g., a copy of a death certificate or an obituary). As an exercise of administrative discretion, each component can require a requester to supply a notarized authorization, a declaration, a completed Privacy Waiver as set forth in 39 CFR 266.5(b)(2)(iii), or other additional information if necessary in order to verify that a particular individual has consented to disclosure. * * * * * 0 4. Amend Sec. 265.6 to add paragraph (e)(2) to read as follows: Sec. 265.6 Responses to requests. * * * * * (e) * * * (2) Any component invoking an exclusion must maintain an administrative record of the process of invocation and approval of exclusion by OIP. 0 5. Amend Sec. 265.9 to revise paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows: Sec. 265.9 Fees. * * * * * (c) * * * (3) Review. Commercial-use requesters shall be charged review fees at the rate of $21.00 for each half hour by personnel reviewing the records. Review fees shall be assessed in connection with the initial review of the record, i.e., the review conducted by a component to determine whether an exemption applies to a particular record or portion of a record. No charge will be made for review at the administrative appeal stage of exemptions applied at the initial review stage. However, if a particular exemption is deemed to no longer apply, any costs associated with a component's re-review of the records in order to consider the use of other exemptions may be assessed as review fees. * * * * * 0 6. Amend Sec. 265.14 to revise paragraphs (b), (d)(1), and (d)(2) to read as follows: Sec. 265.14 Rules concerning specific categories of records. * * * * * (b) Information not subject to mandatory public disclosure. Certain types of information are exempt from mandatory disclosure under exemptions contained in the Freedom of Information Act and in 39 U.S.C. 410(c). The Postal Service will exercise its discretion, in accordance with the policy stated in Sec. 265.1(c), as implemented by instructions issued by the Records Office with the approval of the General Counsel in determining whether the public interest is served by the inspection or copying of records that are: (1) Related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the Postal Service. (2) Trade secrets, or privileged or confidential commercial or financial information, obtained from any person. (3) Information of a commercial nature, including trade secrets, whether or not obtained from a person outside the Postal Service, which under good business practice would not be publicly disclosed. Information is of a commercial nature if it relates to commerce, trade, profit, or the Postal Service's ability to conduct itself in a businesslike manner. (i) When assessing whether information is commercial in nature, the Postal Service will consider whether the information: (A) Relates to products or services subject to economic competition, including, but not limited to, ``competitive'' products or services as defined in 39 U.S.C. 3631 and by regulations and decisions of the Postal Regulatory Commission, an inbound international service, or an outbound international service for which rates or service features are treated as nonpublic in regulatory filings; (B) Relates to the Postal Service's activities that are analogous to a private business in the marketplace; [[Page 27935]] (C) Would be of potential benefit to individuals or entities in economic competition with the Postal Service, its customers, suppliers, affiliates, or business partners or could be used to cause harm to a commercial interest of the Postal Service, its customers, suppliers, affiliates, or business partners; (D) Is proprietary or includes conditions or protections on distribution and disclosure, is subject to a nondisclosure agreement, or a third party has otherwise expressed an interest in protecting such information from disclosure; (E) Is the result of negotiations, agreements, contracts or business deals between the Postal Service and a business entity; or (F) Relates primarily to the Postal Service's governmental functions or its activities as a provider of basic public services. (ii) No one factor is determinative. Rather, each factor should be considered in conjunction with the other factors and the overall character of the particular information. Some examples of commercial information include, but are not limited to: (A) Information related to methods of handling valuable registered mail. (B) Records of money orders except as provided in Section 509.3 of the Domestic Mail Manual. (C) Technical information concerning postage meters and prototypes submitted for Postal Service approval prior to leasing to mailers. (D) Quantitative data, whether historical or current, reflecting the number of postage meters or PC postage accounts. (E) Reports of market surveys conducted by or under contract on behalf of the Postal Service. (F) Records indicating carrier or delivery lines of travel. (G) Information which, if publicly disclosed, could materially increase procurement costs. (H) Information which, if publicly disclosed, could compromise testing or examination materials. (I) Service performance data on competitive services. (J) Facility specific volume, revenue, and cost information. (K) Country-specific international mail volume and revenue data. (L) Non-public international volume, revenue and cost data. (M) Pricing and negotiated terms in bilateral arrangements with foreign postal operators. (N) Information identifying USPS business customers. (O) Financial information in or the identities of parties to Negotiated Service Agreements or Package Incentive Agreements. (P) Negotiated terms in contracts. (Q) Negotiated terms in leases. (R) Geolocation data. (S) Proprietary algorithms or software created by the Postal Service. (T) Sales performance goals, standards, or requirements. (U) Technical information or specifications concerning mail processing equipment. * * * * * (d) * * * (1) Change of address. The new address of any specific business or organization that has filed a permanent change of address order (by submitting PS Form 3575, a hand written order, or an electronically communicated order) will be furnished to any person upon request. If a domestic violence shelter has filed a letter on official letterhead from a domestic violence coalition stating: (i) That such domestic violence coalition meets the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 10410; and (ii) That the organization filing the change of address is a domestic violence shelter, the new address shall not be released except pursuant to applicable routine uses. The new address of any individual or family that has filed a permanent or temporary change of address order will be furnished only in those circumstances stated at paragraph (d)(5) of this section. Disclosure will be limited to the address of the specifically identified individual about whom the information is requested (not other family members or individuals whose names may also appear on the change of address order). The Postal Service reserves the right not to disclose the address of an individual for the protection of the individual's personal safety. Other information on PS Form 3575 or copies of the form will not be furnished except in those circumstances stated at paragraphs (d)(5)(i), (d)(5)(iii), or (d)(5)(iv) of this section. (2) Name and address of permit holder. The name and address of the holder of a particular bulk mail permit, permit imprint or similar permit (but not including postage meter licenses), and the name of any person applying for a permit on behalf of a holder will be furnished to any person upon request. For the name and address of a postage meter license holder, see paragraph (d)(3) of this section. (Lists of permit holders may not be disclosed to members of the public. See paragraph (e)(1) of this section.) * * * * * PART 266--PRIVACY OF INFORMATION 0 7. The authority citation for part 266 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a; 39 U.S.C. 401. 0 8. Amend Sec. 266.3 to revise the introductory text of paragraph (a), paragraphs (a)(1)(iii) and (a)(3), (b)(1) introductory text, (b)(1)(i), (b)(1)(iii), (b)(2) introductory text, (b)(2)(iii), (b)(2)(xi), and the paragraph heading of (b)(5) to read as follows: Sec. 266.3 Collection and disclosure of information about individuals. (a) This section governs the collection of information about individuals, as defined in the Privacy Act of 1974, throughout the United States Postal Service and across its operations; * * * * * (3) The Postal Service will maintain no record describing how an individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity. * * * * * (b) * * * (1) Limitations. The Postal Service will not disclose information about an individual unless reasonable efforts have been made to assure that the information is accurate, complete, timely and relevant to the extent provided by the Privacy Act and unless: (i) The individual to whom the record pertains has requested in writing, or with the prior written consent of the individual to whom the record pertains, that the information be disclosed, unless the individual would not be entitled to access to the record under the Postal Reorganization Act, the Privacy Act, or other law; * * * * * (iii) The disclosure is in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section. (2) Conditions of Disclosure. Disclosure of personal information maintained in a system of records may be made: * * * * * (iii) For a routine use as contained in the system of records notices published in the Federal Register; * * * * * (xi) Pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction. A court of competent jurisdiction is defined in Article III of the United States Constitution including, but not limited to any United States District Court, any United States or Federal Court of [[Page 27936]] Appeals, the United States Court of Federal Claims, and the United States Supreme Court. For purposes of this section, state courts are not courts of competent jurisdiction. * * * * * (5) Employment status. * * * * * * * * Ruth Stevenson, Attorney, Federal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2018-12858 Filed 6-14-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules 27933
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If of the Sabine Pass Anchorage Ground by CONTACT section of this document for
you have questions about this notice of 800 feet on the north end of the alternate instructions. In your
inquiry, call or email Mr. Scott K. anchorage in order to reduce the risk of submission, please include the docket
Whalen, Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur, collision between anchored vessels and number for this notice of inquiry and
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 409–719– berthing and unberthing vessels at provide a reason for each suggestion or
5086, email: Scott.K.Whalen@uscg.mil. Cheniere’s terminal, as well as to reduce recommendation.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the risk of grounding by providing a We accept anonymous comments. All
larger maneuvering area for vessels comments received will be posted
I. Table of Abbreviations calling Cheniere’s terminal (71 FR without change to http://
58330). Both comments we received www.regulations.gov and will include
CFR Code of Federal Regulations during that rulemaking process
DHS Department of Homeland Security
any personal information you have
U.S.C. United States Code
supported the proposed reduction on provided. For more about privacy and
the basis of enhancing navigation safety. the docket, visit http://
II. Background and Purpose One commenter noted that ‘‘the www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
In 1967, the Secretary of the Army anchorage was infrequently used and Documents mentioned in this notice
transferred responsibility for certain would have minimal impact on the of inquiry as being available in the
functions, power, and duties to the economy.’’ On January 5, 2007, the docket, and all public comments, will
Secretary of Transportation. Among the Coast Guard published the final rule be in our online docket at http://
responsibilities transferred to the reducing the overall size of the www.regulations.gov and can be viewed
Secretary of Transportation was anchorage consistent with the proposal by following that website’s instructions.
establishment and administration of (72 FR 463). Dated: June 12, 2018.
On November 8, 2017, we received a
water vessel anchorages. On December Paul F. Thomas,
request from Sabine Pass LNG L.P. to
12, 1967, the regulations for the Sabine Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
disestablish the Sabine Pass Anchorage
Pass Anchorage Ground were Eighth Coast Guard District.
Ground in its entirety. The request
republished in 33 CFR part 110, without [FR Doc. 2018–12910 Filed 6–14–18; 8:45 am]
states that the anchorage is rarely used
change, under this new authority (32 FR
and its disestablishment would not BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
17726). The regulations for the Sabine
significantly impact vessels that use the
Pass Channel Anchorage Ground in
area. A copy of this request is available
Sabine, TX are contained in 33 CFR POSTAL SERVICE
in the docket where indicated under
110.196.
ADDRESSES.
The legal basis and authorities for this A review of Vessel Traffic Service 39 CFR Parts 265 and 266
notice of inquiry are found in 33 U.S.C. transit reports shows that deep draft
471, 1221 through 1236; 33 CFR 1.05– ships have not made use of this Production or Disclosure of Material or
1, and Department of Homeland anchorage during the last decade. It is Information
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which estimated that the anchorage area is
collectively authorize the Coast Guard AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.
utilized an average of 27 times each year ACTION: Proposed rule.
to propose, establish, and define by shallow draft vessels (for example,
regulatory anchorages. As reflected in tows, dredges, and work boats) for SUMMARY: The Postal Service proposes
title 33 CFR 109.05, the Commandant of shortening tow or for use as a staging to amend its Freedom of Information
the U.S. Coast Guard has delegated the area for local work projects such as Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act regulations.
authority to establish anchorage grounds dredging. These changes would improve clarity,
to U.S. Coast Guard District
III. Information Requested make technical corrections, and create a
Commanders. The Coast Guard is now
definition of ‘‘information of a
requesting comments on considering a We seek your comments on whether commercial nature’’ as it pertains to the
proposed rulemaking based on Sabine we should consider a proposed Postal Reorganization Act’s provisions
Pass LNG L.P.’s request for rulemaking to disestablish or otherwise concerning disclosure of information
disestablishing the Sabine Pass modify the Sabine Pass Anchorage under the Freedom of Information Act.
Anchorage Ground, or if other actions, Ground. In particular, the Coast Guard
such as reducing the size of the DATES: Comments must be received on
requests your input to determine if there or before July 16, 2018.
anchorage, should also be considered. remains a need for a regulated
As discussed earlier, administration ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written
anchorage in this area, and if so, to what
of the Sabine Pass Anchorage Ground extent and for what purpose; if a comments to: Associate General Counsel
was originally transferred to the Coast reduction in size of the anchorage and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer,
Guard in 1967. Under 33 CFR 110.196, would meet current and anticipated 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW, Room 6000,
the anchorage ground is ‘‘for the industry needs; or if other options Washington, DC 20260–1135. Email and
temporary use of vessels of all types, but should be considered. Recent U.S. Army faxed comments are not accepted. You
especially for naval and merchant Corps of Engineers survey data of the may inspect and photocopy all written
vessels awaiting weather and tidal anchorage is available in the docket comments, by appointment only, at
conditions favorable to the resumption where indicated under ADDRESSES. USPS® Headquarters Library, 475
of their voyages.’’ In 2006, Cheniere L’Enfant Plaza SW, 11th Floor North,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Energy began construction of a liquefied IV. Public Participation and Request for Washington, DC 20260. These records
natural gas terminal on the eastern Comments are available for review on Monday
waterfront of the Sabine Pass Channel, We encourage you to submit through Friday, 9 a.m.–4 p.m., by
immediately north and adjacent to the comments through the Federal portal at calling 202–268–2904.
Sabine Pass Channel Anchorage http://www.regulations.gov. If your FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ground. On October 3, 2006, the Coast material cannot be submitted using Ruth B. Stevenson, Attorney, Federal
Guard published a notice of proposed http://www.regulations.gov, contact the Compliance, ruth.b.stevenson@usps.gov,
rulemaking proposing to reduce the area person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 202–268–6627.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:14 Jun 14, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM 15JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_28049/page/1.svg)
![27936 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Appeals, the United States Court of Once submitted, comments cannot be treatment of GHGs in the context of the
Federal Claims, and the United States edited or removed from Regulations.gov. PSD permit program under the Clean
Supreme Court. For purposes of this For either manner of submission, the Air Act (CAA). The revision consists of
section, state courts are not courts of EPA may publish any comment received removing the requirement that sources
competent jurisdiction. to its public docket. Do not submit would have to obtain a PSD permit
* * * * * electronically any information you solely due to its GHG emissions,
(5) Employment status. * * * consider to be Confidential Business commonly known as ‘‘Step 2’’ sources.
Information (CBI) or other information On January 2, 2011, GHG emissions
* * * * *
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. were, for the first time, covered by the
Ruth Stevenson, Multimedia submissions (audio, video, PSD and title V operating permit
Attorney, Federal Compliance. etc.) must be accompanied by a written programs. See 75 FR 17004, (April 2,
[FR Doc. 2018–12858 Filed 6–14–18; 8:45 am] comment. The written comment is 2010). To establish a process for phasing
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
considered the official comment and in the permitting requirements for
should include discussion of all points stationary sources of GHGs under the
you wish to make. The EPA will CAA PSD and title V programs, on June
generally not consider comments or 3, 2010, the EPA published a final rule
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
comment contents located outside of the entitled ‘‘Prevention of Significant
AGENCY Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
40 CFR Part 52 cloud, or other file sharing system). For Gas Tailoring Rule’’ (hereinafter referred
additional submission methods, please to as the GHG Tailoring Rule). See 75 FR
[EPA–R01–OAR–2018–0212; FRL–9978– contact the person identified in the FOR 31514. In Step 1 of the GHG Tailoring
97—Region 1] Rule, which began on January 2, 2011,
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, the EPA limited application of PSD and
Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; title V requirements to sources of GHG
Prevention of Significant Deterioration; information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on emissions only if they were subject to
Revisions to the Prevention of PSD or title V ‘‘anyway’’ due to their
Significant Deterioration Greenhouse making effective comments, please visit
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa- emissions of pollutants other than
Gas Permitting Authority GHGs. These sources are referred to as
dockets. Publicly available docket
AGENCY: Environmental Protection materials are available at ‘‘anyway sources.’’ In Step 2 of the GHG
Agency (EPA). www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. Tailoring Rule, which applied as of July
ACTION: Proposed rule. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 1, 2011, the PSD and title V permitting
New England Regional Office, Office of program requirements applied to some
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality sources that were classified as major
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square— sources based solely on their GHG
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Suite 100, Boston, MA. The EPA emissions or potential to emit GHGs.
revision submitted by the State of requests that if at all possible, you Step 2 also applied PSD permitting
Connecticut. This revision affects contact the contact listed in the FOR requirements to modifications of
provisions applicable to greenhouse FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to otherwise major sources that would
gases (GHGs) in the EPA’s Prevention of schedule your inspection. The Regional increase only GHG emissions above the
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit Office’s official hours of business are level in the EPA regulations. EPA
program. Connecticut requested the Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to generally described the sources covered
revision in response to the June 23, 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays. by PSD during Step 2 of the GHG
2014, U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tailoring Rule as ‘‘Step 2 sources’’ or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. ‘‘GHG-only sources.’’
Donald Dahl, Air Permits, Toxics, and The United States Supreme Court
EPA and the April 10, 2015, Amended Indoor Programs Unit, U.S.
Judgment by the United States Court of invalidated the EPA’s regulation of Step
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 2 sources in Utility Air Regulatory
Appeals for the District of Columbia New England Regional Office, 5 Post
Circuit (D.C. Circuit) in Coalition for Group (UARG) v. EPA, 134 S Ct. 2427
Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail code (2014). In accordance with that
Responsible Regulation v. EPA. The OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, tel.
intended effect of this action is to clarify decision, the United States Court of
(617) 918–1657, email dahl.donald@ Appeals for the District of Columbia
that the State’s PSD rules do not require epa.gov.
a source to obtain a permit solely Circuit vacated the federal regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: that implemented Step 2 of the GHG
because the source emits or has the
Throughout this document whenever Tailoring Rule. See Coalition for
potential to emit (PTE) GHGs: Above the
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. EPA, 606
PSD applicability thresholds for new
the EPA. Fed. Appx. 6, 7 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
major sources; or for which there is a
significant emissions increase from a Table of Contents Subsequently, the EPA removed the
modification. This action is being taken vacated elements from its rules. See 80
I. Background and Purpose
under the Clean Air Act. II. EPA’s Review FR 50199 (August 19, 2015). The EPA
III. Proposed Action therefore has the authority to approve a
DATES: Written comments must be
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Incorporation by Reference state’s request to remove Step 2 sources
received on or before July 16, 2018. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews from the SIP.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– I. Background and Purpose II. EPA’s Review
OAR–2018–0212 at On February 28, 2018, the Section 110(l) of the CAA states that
www.regulations.gov, or via email to. Connecticut Department of Energy and the EPA shall not approve a revision to
For comments submitted at Environmental Protection (CT DEEP) the SIP if the revision would interfere
Regulations.gov, follow the online submitted a revision to its State with any applicable requirement
instructions for submitting comments. Implementation Plan (SIP) for the concerning attainment (of the NAAQS)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:14 Jun 14, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM 15JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_28049/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-02 12:01:08
Document Modified: 2018-11-02 12:01:08
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before July 16, 2018. | |
| Contact | Ruth B. Stevenson, Attorney, Federal Compliance, [email protected], 202-268-6627. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 27933 | |
| CFR Citation | 39
CFR
265 39 CFR 266 | |
| CFR Associated | Administrative Practice and Procedure; Courts; Freedom of Information; Government Employees and Privacy |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR