83 FR 28376 - Safety Zone; Enbridge Anchoring Operations, Straits of Mackinac, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 118 (June 19, 2018)

Page Range		28376-28378
FR Document		2018-13110

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie zone. This safety zone is intended to restrict certain portions of the waters of Lake Michigan in the Straits of Mackinac in the vicinity of a construction barge and tug. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the public and workers from the potential hazards associated with diving operations and installation of additional pipeline anchors.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28376-28378]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13110]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0546]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Enbridge Anchoring Operations, Straits of Mackinac, 
MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the 
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie zone. This safety zone is 
intended to restrict certain portions of the waters of Lake Michigan in 
the Straits of Mackinac in the vicinity of a construction barge and 
tug. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the public and 
workers from the potential hazards associated with diving operations 
and installation of additional pipeline anchors.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from June 19, 2018 
until September 4, 2018. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice 
will be used from June 15, 2018, until June 19, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0546 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email MSTC Steven Durden, Sector Sault Sainte Marie Waterways 
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 906-635-3222, email 
Steven.E.Durden@uscg.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 28377]]

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and 
contrary to the public interest. The Coast Guard was notified of the 
approval of this project by the State of Michigan and U.S. Army Corp of 
Engineers on May 22, 2018. Delaying this rule to wait for a notice and 
comment period to run would be impracticable and contrary to the public 
interest because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect 
the public and workers from the potential hazards associated with 
diving operations and installation of additional pipeline anchors.
    We are issuing this final rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the 
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less 
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. For the same 
reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph, a 30 day notice period 
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. It is 
impracticable to wait for the 30 day notice period to run because we 
must establish this safety zone immediately to protect the public from 
the hazards associated with diving operations and installation of 
additional pipeline anchors.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to 
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    This rule establishes a safety zone from June 15, 2018 until 
September 4, 2018. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters of 
Lake Michigan, Straits of Mackinac within 500ft of a construction barge 
and tug. This rule is needed to protect the public and workers within 
the safety zone while diving operations and installation of additional 
pipeline anchors are taking place.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule is necessary to ensure the safety of the public and 
workers during the aforementioned operations. The temporary safety zone 
will encompass all U.S. navigable waters within 500ft of the barge 
``Big Digger'' while operating in the Mackinac Straits between the 
areas marked on chart 14880 as ``Pipeline & Cable Area.'' The western 
boundary is a line from 45[deg]50'1'' N, 084[deg]46'05'' W to 
45[deg]47'30'' N, 084[deg]47'00'' W. The eastern boundary is a line 
from 45[deg]50'20'' N, 084[deg]45'08'' W to 45[deg]47'20'' N, 
84[deg]46'14'' W. The safety zone will be enforced until September 4, 
2018.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte 
Marie, or his designated representative. The Captain of the Port or a 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 
or telephone at 906-635-3233.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule is 
confined to area encompassing urgent operations. Under certain 
conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety 
zones when permitted by the Captain of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might 
be small entities: the owners or operators of the vessels intending to 
transit in the vicinity of the safety zone.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the reasons identified in the 
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Further, the Coast Guard will 
give advance notice to the public via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners so 
the public can plan accordingly.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the

[[Page 28378]]

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves establishment of a safety zone and, therefore, is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of 
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A 
Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) supporting this 
determination is available in the docket where indicated in the 
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. However, we seek any comments or 
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0546 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0546  Safety Zone; Enbridge Anchoring Operations, Straits 
of Mackinac, MI.

    (a) Location. The following areas are temporary safety zones: All 
U.S. navigable waters within 500 ft of a construction barge and tug 
while operating in the Mackinac Straits between the areas marked on 
chart 14880 as ``Pipeline & Cable Area.'' The western boundary is a 
line from 45[deg]50'1'' N, 084[deg]46'05'' W to 45[deg]47'30'' N, 
084[deg]47'00'' W. The eastern boundary is a line from 45[deg]50'20'' 
N, 084[deg]45'08'' W to 45[deg]47'20'' N, 84[deg]46'14'' W.
    (b) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety 
zone described in paragraph (a) is prohibited unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his designated 
representative.
    (2) Vessel Operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie, or his 
on-scene representative via VHF Channel 16 or telephone at 906-635-
3233. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the 
safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the 
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his on-scene representative.
    (c) This rule will be enforced from June 15, 2018, until September 
4, 2018.

    Dated: June 13, 2018
M.R. Broz,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte 
Marie.
[FR Doc. 2018-13110 Filed 6-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 28377

I. Table of Abbreviations needed to protect the public and Under certain conditions, moreover,
CFR Code of Federal Regulations workers within the safety zone while vessels may still transit through the
DHS Department of Homeland Security diving operations and installation of safety zones when permitted by the
FR Federal Register additional pipeline anchors are taking Captain of the Port.
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking place.
B. Impact on Small Entities
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code IV. Discussion of the Rule The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
This rule is necessary to ensure the 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
II. Background Information and
safety of the public and workers during requires Federal agencies to consider
Regulatory History
the aforementioned operations. The the potential impact of regulations on
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary safety zone will encompass small entities during rulemaking. The
temporary rule without prior notice and all U.S. navigable waters within 500ft of term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
opportunity to comment pursuant to the barge ‘‘Big Digger’’ while operating businesses, not-for-profit organizations
authority under section 4(a) of the in the Mackinac Straits between the that are independently owned and
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 areas marked on chart 14880 as operated and are not dominant in their
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision ‘‘Pipeline & Cable Area.’’ The western fields, and governmental jurisdictions
authorizes an agency to issue a rule boundary is a line from 45°50′1″ N, with populations of less than 50,000.
without prior notice and opportunity to 084°46′05″ W to 45°47′30″ N, 084°47′00″ The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
comment when the agency for good W. The eastern boundary is a line from 605(b) that this rule will not have a
cause finds that those procedures are 45°50′20″ N, 084°45′08″ W to 45°47′20″ significant economic impact on a
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary N, 84°46′14″ W. The safety zone will be substantial number of small entities.
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. enforced until September 4, 2018. This rule will affect the following
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that Entry into, transiting, or anchoring entities, some of which might be small
good cause exists for not publishing a within the safety zone is prohibited entities: the owners or operators of the
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) unless authorized by the Captain of the vessels intending to transit in the
with respect to this rule because doing Port, Sault Sainte Marie, or his vicinity of the safety zone.
so would be impracticable and contrary designated representative. The Captain This safety zone will not have a
to the public interest. The Coast Guard of the Port or a designated on-scene significant economic impact on a
was notified of the approval of this representative may be contacted via substantial number of small entities for
project by the State of Michigan and VHF Channel 16 or telephone at 906– the reasons identified in the Regulatory
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers on May 22, 635–3233. Planning and Review section. Further,
2018. Delaying this rule to wait for a the Coast Guard will give advance
notice and comment period to run V. Regulatory Analyses notice to the public via a Broadcast
would be impracticable and contrary to We developed this rule after Notice to Mariners so the public can
the public interest because it would considering numerous statutes and plan accordingly.
inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability to Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Under section 213(a) of the Small
protect the public and workers from the Below we summarize our analyses Business Regulatory Enforcement
potential hazards associated with diving based on a number of these statutes and Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
operations and installation of additional Executive Orders, and we discuss First we want to assist small entities in
pipeline anchors. Amendment rights of protestors. understanding this rule. If the rule
We are issuing this final rule, and would affect your small business,
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast organization, or governmental
Guard finds that good cause exists for Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 jurisdiction and you have questions
making it effective less than 30 days direct agencies to assess the costs and concerning its provisions or options for
after publication in the Federal benefits of available regulatory compliance, please contact the person
Register. For the same reasons alternatives and, if regulation is listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
discussed in the preceding paragraph, a necessary, to select regulatory CONTACT section.
30 day notice period would be approaches that maximize net benefits. Small businesses may send comments
impracticable and contrary to the public Executive Order 13771 directs agencies on the actions of Federal employees
interest. It is impracticable to wait for to control regulatory costs through a who enforce, or otherwise determine
the 30 day notice period to run because budgeting process. This rule has not compliance with, Federal regulations to
we must establish this safety zone been designated a ‘‘significant the Small Business and Agriculture
immediately to protect the public from regulatory action,’’ under Executive Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
the hazards associated with diving Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has and the Regional Small Business
operations and installation of additional not been reviewed by the Office of Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
pipeline anchors. Management and Budget (OMB), and Ombudsman evaluates these actions
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt annually and rates each agency’s
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule from the requirements of Executive responsiveness to small business. If you
The legal basis for the rule is the Order 13771. wish to comment on actions by
Coast Guard’s authority to establish We conclude that this rule is not a employees of the Coast Guard, call
safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR significant regulatory action because we 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
1.05–1, 160.5; Department of Homeland anticipate that it will have minimal The Coast Guard will not retaliate
impact on the economy, will not
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

Security Delegation No. 0170.1. against small entities that question or
This rule establishes a safety zone interfere with other agencies, will not complain about this rule or any policy
from June 15, 2018 until September 4, adversely alter the budget of any grant or action of the Coast Guard.
2018. The safety zone will cover all or loan recipients, and will not raise any
navigable waters of Lake Michigan, novel legal or policy issues. The safety C. Collection of Information
Straits of Mackinac within 500ft of a zone created by this rule is confined to This rule will not call for a new
construction barge and tug. This rule is area encompassing urgent operations. collection of information under the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:20 Jun 18, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM 19JNR1

28378 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental representative via VHF Channel 16 or
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Consideration (REC) supporting this telephone at 906–635–3233. Vessel
determination is available in the docket operators given permission to enter or
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
where indicated in the ADDRESSES operate in the safety zone must comply
Governments
section of this preamble. However, we with all directions given to them by the
A rule has implications for federalism seek any comments or information that Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie
under Executive Order 13132, may lead to the discovery of a or his on-scene representative.
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct significant environmental impact from (c) This rule will be enforced from
effect on the States, on the relationship this rule. June 15, 2018, until September 4, 2018.
between the national government and
G. Protest Activities Dated: June 13, 2018
the States, or on the distribution of
M.R. Broz,
power and responsibilities among the The Coast Guard respects the First
various levels of government. We have Amendment rights of protesters. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the
Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie.
analyzed this rule under that Order and Protesters are asked to contact the
have determined that it is consistent [FR Doc. 2018–13110 Filed 6–18–18; 8:45 am]
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
with the fundamental federalism INFORMATION CONTACT section to BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

principles and preemption requirements coordinate protest activities so that your
described in Executive Order 13132. message can be received without
Also, this rule does not have tribal jeopardizing the safety or security of DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
implications under Executive Order people, places or vessels. SECURITY
13175, Consultation and Coordination
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Coast Guard
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
33 CFR Part 165
direct effect on one or more Indian (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
tribes, on the relationship between the requirements, Security measures,
Federal Government and Indian tribes, Waterways. [Docket No. USCG–2018–0584]
or on the distribution of power and For the reasons discussed in the Safety Zones; Recurring Safety Zones
responsibilities between the Federal preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 in Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Government and Indian tribes. If you CFR part 165 as follows: Marie Zone for Events Beginning in
believe this rule has implications for
June 2018
federalism or Indian tribes, please PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
contact the person listed in the FOR AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section ACTION: Notice of enforcement of
above. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows: regulation.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; established safety zones for the Grand
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Department of Homeland Security Delegation Marais Splash In, Jordan Valley
Federal agencies to assess the effects of No. 0170.1. Freedom Festival Fireworks, Festival of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0546 to read as Fireworks Celebration Fireworks, and
particular, the Act addresses actions follows: National Cherry Festival starting in
that may result in the expenditure by a June, 2018 to provide for the safety of
State, local, or tribal government, in the § 165.T09–0546 Safety Zone; Enbridge life on navigable waterways. Our
aggregate, or by the private sector of Anchoring Operations, Straits of Mackinac,
regulation for safety zones within the
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or MI.
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
more in any one year. Though this rule (a) Location. The following areas are Zone identifies the regulated area for
will not result in such an expenditure, temporary safety zones: All U.S. these safety zones. During the
we do discuss the effects of this rule navigable waters within 500 ft of a enforcement periods, vessels must stay
elsewhere in this preamble. construction barge and tug while out of the established safety zone and
operating in the Mackinac Straits may only enter with permission from
F. Environment between the areas marked on chart the designated representative of the
We have analyzed this rule under 14880 as ‘‘Pipeline & Cable Area.’’ The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
Department of Homeland Security western boundary is a line from
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
Management Directive 023–01 and 45°50′1″ N, 084°46′05″ W to 45°47′30″
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 165.918 will be enforced for the safety
N, 084°47′00″ W. The eastern boundary
which guide the Coast Guard in zones identified in the SUPPLEMENTARY
is a line from 45°50′20″ N, 084°45′08″ W
INFORMATION section below for the dates
complying with the National to 45°47′20″ N, 84°46′14″ W.
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 (b) Regulations. (1) In accordance and times specified.
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have with the general regulations in § 165.23, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
determined that this action is one of a entry into, transiting, or anchoring you have questions about this
category of actions that do not within the safety zone described in publication, call or email Chief Steven
individually or cumulatively have a paragraph (a) is prohibited unless Durden, Waterways Management, Coast
Guard Sector Sault Sainte Marie, U.S.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

significant effect on the human authorized by the Captain of the Port,
environment. This rule involves Sault Sainte Marie or his designated Coast Guard; telephone 906–635–3222,
establishment of a safety zone and, representative. email Steven.E.Durden@uscg.mil.
therefore, is categorically excluded from (2) Vessel Operators desiring to enter SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
further review under paragraph L60(a) or operate within the safety zone shall Guard will enforce the safety zones in
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS contact the Captain of the Port, Sault 33 CFR 165.918 as per the time, dates,
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Sainte Marie, or his on-scene and locations in Table 1.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:20 Jun 18, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM 19JNR1

Document Created: 2018-07-02 11:21:56
Document Modified: 2018-07-02 11:21:56

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from June 19, 2018 until September 4, 2018. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from June 15, 2018, until June 19, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email MSTC Steven Durden, Sector Sault Sainte Marie Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 906-635-3222, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 28376
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 28376 - Safety Zone; Enbridge Anchoring Operations, Straits of Mackinac, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 118 (June 19, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard