83 FR 31348 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 129 (July 5, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 129 (July 5, 2018)
| Page Range | 31348-31350 | |
| FR Document | 2018-14333 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 31348-31350] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-14333] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0502; FRL-9980-32--Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West Virginia. This revision pertains to West Virginia's Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 6, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03- OAR-2017-0502 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Talley, (215) 814-2117, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 2017, the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), on behalf of the State of West Virginia, submitted a revision to its PSD regulations found at title 45, chapter 14 of the Code of State Rules (CSR) as a revision to the West Virginia SIP. I. Background WVDEP's June 6, 2017 SIP submittal included a number of revisions to West Virginia's PSD regulations under 45CSR14. The revisions were largely non-substantive and administrative in nature. However, as discussed in subsequent sections of this notice, WVDEP's SIP submittal also contained revisions to PSD provisions relating to the regulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Additionally, WVDEP's June 6, 2017 submittal letter references EPA's conditional approval \1\ of two SIP submittals (June 6, 2012 and July 1, 2014), related to the regulation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ). Specifically, the letter states, ``. . .EPA may subsequently issue a final rule in which West Virginia's conditional approval of the 2012 and 2014 SIP revisions of 45CSR14 will become final approvals.'' \2\ EPA notes that full and final approval has already been granted to West Virginia's 2012 and 2014 submittals, and that there are no outstanding issues related to WVDEP's regulation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ). See 81 FR 53008 (August 11, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See 80 FR 36483 (June 25, 2015). \2\ See WVDEP's June 6, 2017 submittal letter, included in the docket for this action. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In a June 3, 2010 final rulemaking action, EPA promulgated regulations known as ``the Tailoring Rule,'' which phased in permitting requirements for GHG emissions from stationary sources under the CAA PSD and title V permitting programs. See 75 FR 31514. For Step 1 of the Tailoring Rule, which began on January 2, 2011, PSD or title V requirements applied to sources of GHG emissions only if the sources were subject to PSD or title V ``anyway'' due to their emissions of non-GHG pollutants. These sources are referred to as ``anyway sources.'' Step 2 of the Tailoring Rule, which began on July 1, 2011, applied the PSD and title V permitting requirements under the CAA to sources that were classified as major, and, thus, required to obtain a permit, based solely on their potential GHG emissions. Step 2 also applied to modifications of otherwise major sources that required a PSD permit because they increased only GHGs above applicable levels in the EPA regulations. On June 23, 2014, the United States Supreme Court, in Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. Environmental Protection Agency,\3\ issued a decision addressing the Tailoring Rule and the application of PSD permitting requirements to GHG emissions. The Supreme Court said that the EPA may not treat GHGs as an air pollutant for purposes of determining whether a source is a major source required to obtain a PSD permit. The Court also said that the EPA could continue to require that PSD permits, otherwise required based on emissions of pollutants other than GHGs, contain limitations on GHG emissions based on the application of Best Available Control Technology (BACT). The Supreme Court decision effectively upheld PSD permitting requirements for GHG emissions under Step 1 of the Tailoring Rule for ``anyway sources'' and invalidated PSD permitting requirements for Step 2 sources. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See 134 S.Ct. 2427. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with the Supreme Court decision, on April 10, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) issued an amended judgment vacating the regulations that implemented Step 2 of the Tailoring Rule, but not the regulations that implement Step 1 of the [[Page 31349]] Tailoring Rule.\4\ The amended judgment preserves, without the need for additional rulemaking by the EPA, the application of the BACT requirement to GHG emissions from sources that are required to obtain a PSD permit based on emissions of pollutants other than GHGs (i.e., the ``anyway'' sources). The D.C. Circuit's judgment vacated the regulations at issue in the litigation, including 40 CFR 51.166(b)(48)(v), ``to the extent they require a stationary source to obtain a PSD permit if greenhouse gases are the only pollutant (i) that the source emits or has the potential to emit above the applicable major source thresholds, or (ii) for which there is a significant emissions increase from a modification.'' \5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. EPA, D.C. Cir., No. 09-1322, 06/26/20, judgment entered for No. 09-1322 on 04/10/2015. \5\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In response to these court decisions, EPA took final action on August 19, 2015 to remove the vacated elements from the federal PSD program. See 80 FR 50199. As discussed further in Section II of this notice, WVDEP's June 6, 2017 submittal included revisions enacted in order to make WVDEP's PSD program consistent with the federal program. II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis WVDEP's June 6, 2017 submittal included revisions to the definition of ``subject to regulation'' at subdivision 2.80 of 45-14-2. Specifically, subdivisions 2.80.e, 2.80.f, and 2.80.g were deleted in their entirety. These subdivisions were the mechanism through which WVDEP implemented the Tailoring Rule Step 2 provisions which were vacated and revised by EPA as a result of the UARG v. EPA decision discussed in Section I of this notice. WVDEP's revised definition of ``subject to regulation'' is consistent with the federal definition at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(48)(v) and 52.21(b)(49)(v), and ensures that the preconstruction permitting requirements of WVDEP's PSD program will be applied to GHG sources in a manner consistent with the Supreme Court decision in UARG v. EPA. Further, EPA finds that these deletions are in accordance with section 110(l) of the CAA because they will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable CAA requirement. In addition to the previously discussed revisions, WVDEP's June 6, 2017 submittal included a number of non-substantive, clarifying or administrative revisions. These include the filing date and effective date at subdivisions 45-14-1.3 and 45-14-1.4, and the removal of references to the deleted subdivisions discussed in Section II.A of this notice. WVDEP provided an underline/strikeout version of 45CSR14 so that all of the revisions can be tracked. A copy of this is included in the docket for today's action. III. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve West Virginia's June 6, 2017 SIP revision to its PSD regulations under 45CSR14. West Virginia's June 6, 2017 SIP revision is consistent with 40 CFR 51.166, CAA section 110(a)(2), and is in accordance with section 110(l) of the CAA because it will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable CAA requirement. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this rulemaking notice. These comments will be considered before taking final action. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this proposed rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the West Virginia rules regarding definitions and permitting requirements discussed in Section II of this preamble. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through http://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule, relating to the preconstruction requirements of West Virginia's PSD program, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. [[Page 31350]] Dated: June 21, 2018. Cosmo Servidio, Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2018-14333 Filed 7-3-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![31348 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
of the Commission (Public comments. Once submitted, comments Virginia’s 2012 and 2014 submittals,
Representative) to represent the cannot be edited or removed from and that there are no outstanding issues
interests of the general public in this Regulations.gov. For either manner of related to WVDEP’s regulation of fine
proceeding. submission, EPA may publish any particulate matter (PM2.5). See 81 FR
comment received to its public docket. 53008 (August 11, 2016).
IV. Ordering Paragraphs Do not submit electronically any In a June 3, 2010 final rulemaking
It is ordered: information you consider to be action, EPA promulgated regulations
1. The Commission establishes Docket confidential business information (CBI)
No. RM2018–7 to consider matters known as ‘‘the Tailoring Rule,’’ which
or other information whose disclosure is
raised by the Petition of the United phased in permitting requirements for
restricted by statute. Multimedia
States Postal Service for the Initiation of GHG emissions from stationary sources
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
a Proceeding to Consider Proposed under the CAA PSD and title V
accompanied by a written comment.
Changes in Analytical Principles permitting programs. See 75 FR 31514.
The written comment is considered the
(Proposal Four), filed June 25, 2018. official comment and should include For Step 1 of the Tailoring Rule, which
2. Comments by interested persons in discussion of all points you wish to began on January 2, 2011, PSD or title
this proceeding are due no later than make. EPA will generally not consider V requirements applied to sources of
July 23, 2018. comments or comment contents located GHG emissions only if the sources were
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the outside of the primary submission (i.e., subject to PSD or title V ‘‘anyway’’ due
Commission appoints Jennaca D. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing to their emissions of non-GHG
Upperman to serve as an officer of the system). For additional submission pollutants. These sources are referred to
Commission (Public Representative) to methods, please contact the person as ‘‘anyway sources.’’ Step 2 of the
represent the interests of the general identified in the FOR FURTHER Tailoring Rule, which began on July 1,
public in this docket. INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 2011, applied the PSD and title V
4. The Secretary shall arrange for full EPA public comment policy, permitting requirements under the CAA
publication of this Order in the Federal information about CBI or multimedia to sources that were classified as major,
Register. submissions, and general guidance on and, thus, required to obtain a permit,
making effective comments, please visit based solely on their potential GHG
By the Commission.
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ emissions. Step 2 also applied to
Stacy L. Ruble, modifications of otherwise major
commenting-epa-dockets.
Secretary. sources that required a PSD permit
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2018–14349 Filed 7–3–18; 8:45 am] because they increased only GHGs
David Talley, (215) 814–2117, or by
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
email at talley.david@epa.gov. above applicable levels in the EPA
regulations.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6,
2017, the West Virginia Department of On June 23, 2014, the United States
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Environmental Protection (WVDEP), on Supreme Court, in Utility Air Regulatory
AGENCY behalf of the State of West Virginia, Group (UARG) v. Environmental
submitted a revision to its PSD Protection Agency,3 issued a decision
40 CFR Part 52
regulations found at title 45, chapter 14 addressing the Tailoring Rule and the
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0502; FRL–9980– of the Code of State Rules (CSR) as a application of PSD permitting
32—Region 3] revision to the West Virginia SIP. requirements to GHG emissions. The
Supreme Court said that the EPA may
Approval and Promulgation of Air I. Background not treat GHGs as an air pollutant for
Quality Implementation Plans; West WVDEP’s June 6, 2017 SIP submittal purposes of determining whether a
Virginia; Permits for Construction and included a number of revisions to West source is a major source required to
Major Modification of Major Stationary Virginia’s PSD regulations under obtain a PSD permit. The Court also said
Sources for the Prevention of 45CSR14. The revisions were largely that the EPA could continue to require
Significant Deterioration of Air Quality non-substantive and administrative in that PSD permits, otherwise required
AGENCY: Environmental Protection nature. However, as discussed in based on emissions of pollutants other
Agency (EPA). subsequent sections of this notice, than GHGs, contain limitations on GHG
WVDEP’s SIP submittal also contained emissions based on the application of
ACTION: Proposed rule.
revisions to PSD provisions relating to Best Available Control Technology
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection the regulation of greenhouse gases (BACT). The Supreme Court decision
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a (GHGs). Additionally, WVDEP’s June 6, effectively upheld PSD permitting
state implementation plan (SIP) revision 2017 submittal letter references EPA’s requirements for GHG emissions under
submitted by the State of West Virginia. conditional approval 1 of two SIP Step 1 of the Tailoring Rule for ‘‘anyway
This revision pertains to West Virginia’s submittals (June 6, 2012 and July 1, sources’’ and invalidated PSD
Prevention of Significant Deterioration 2014), related to the regulation of fine permitting requirements for Step 2
(PSD) program. This action is being particulate matter (PM2.5). Specifically, sources.
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). the letter states, ‘‘. . .EPA may
In accordance with the Supreme
subsequently issue a final rule in which
DATES: Written comments must be Court decision, on April 10, 2015, the
West Virginia’s conditional approval of
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
received on or before August 6, 2018. U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
the 2012 and 2014 SIP revisions of
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) issued
45CSR14 will become final approvals.’’ 2
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03– an amended judgment vacating the
EPA notes that full and final approval
OAR–2017–0502 at http:// regulations that implemented Step 2 of
has already been granted to West
www.regulations.gov, or via email to the Tailoring Rule, but not the
duke.gerallyn@epa.gov. For comments 1 See
80 FR 36483 (June 25, 2015).
regulations that implement Step 1 of the
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 2 See
WVDEP’s June 6, 2017 submittal letter,
online instructions for submitting included in the docket for this action. 3 See 134 S.Ct. 2427.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Jul 03, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05JYP1.SGM 05JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_31477/page/1.svg)
![31350 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Dated: June 21, 2018. from Regulations.gov. For either manner adequate provisions to prohibit in-state
Cosmo Servidio, of submission, EPA may publish any emissions activities from having certain
Regional Administrator, Region III. comment received to its public docket. adverse air quality effects on other states
[FR Doc. 2018–14333 Filed 7–3–18; 8:45 am] Do not submit electronically any due to interstate transport of air
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
information you consider to be pollution. There are four prongs within
confidential business information (CBI) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA;
or other information whose disclosure is section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) contains prongs
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION restricted by statute. Multimedia 1 and 2, while section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)
AGENCY submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be includes prongs 3 and 4. Under section
accompanied by a written comment. 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), also called the good
40 CFR Part 52 The written comment is considered the neighbor provision, a state’s SIP must
[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0701; FRL–9980– official comment and should include contain adequate provisions to prohibit
33—Region 3] discussion of all points you wish to any source or other type of emissions
make. EPA will generally not consider activity within the state from emitting
Air Plan Approval; District of comments or comment contents located air pollutants that ‘‘contribute
Columbia; State Implementation Plan outside of the primary submission (i.e. significantly to nonattainment in, or
for the Interstate Transport on the web, cloud, or other file sharing interfere with maintenance by, any
Requirements for the 2008 Ozone system). For additional submission other state with respect to any such
Standard methods, please contact the person national primary or secondary ambient
identified in the FOR FURTHER air quality standard.’’ Under section
AGENCY: Environmental Protection INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA, EPA gives
Agency (EPA). full EPA public comment policy, independent significance to the matter
ACTION: Proposed rule. information about CBI or multimedia of nonattainment (prong 1) and to that
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection submissions, and general guidance on of maintenance (prong 2). Section
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a making effective comments, please visit 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) of the CAA requires
portion of the state implementation plan http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ SIPs to contain adequate provisions to
(SIP) revision submitted by the District commenting-epa-dockets. prohibit emissions that will interfere
of Columbia (the District) that pertains FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: with measures required to be included
to the good neighbor and interstate Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814–5787, or by in the applicable implementation plan
transport requirements of the Clean Air email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov. for any other state under part C to
Act (CAA) for the 2008 ozone national SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June prevent significant deterioration of air
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). 13, 2014, the District Department of the quality (prong 3) or to protect visibility
The CAA’s good neighbor provision Environment (DDOE) on behalf of the (prong 4). This proposed action
requires EPA and states to address the District submitted a revision to its SIP addresses only prongs 1 and 2 of section
interstate transport of air pollution that to satisfy the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i).3
affects the ability of other states 1 to 110(a)(2), including 110(a)(2)(D)(i), of Through the development and
attain and maintain the NAAQS. the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. implementation of several previous
Specifically, the good neighbor I. Background rulemakings,4 EPA, working in
provision requires each state in its SIP partnership with states, established the
to prohibit emissions that will On March 12, 2008, EPA revised the four-step interstate transport framework
significantly contribute to levels of the primary and secondary to address the requirements of the good
nonattainment, or interfere with ozone standards from 0.08 parts per neighbor provision for ozone NAAQS.5
maintenance, of a NAAQS in another million (ppm) to 0.075 ppm (73 FR The four steps are: Step 1—Identify
state. The District has submitted a SIP 16436). Ground level ozone is formed downwind receptors that are expected
revision that addresses the good when nitrogen oxides (NOX) and to have problems attaining or
neighbor provision for the 2008 ozone volatile organic compounds (VOCs) maintaining the NAAQS; step 2—
NAAQS. In this action, EPA is react in the presence of sunlight. NOX determine which upwind states
proposing to approve the District’s SIP and VOCs are referred to as ozone contribute enough to these identified
as having adequate provisions to meet precursors and are emitted by many downwind air quality problems to
the requirements of the good neighbor types of pollution sources, including warrant further review and analysis;
provision for the 2008 ozone NAAQS in motor vehicles, power plants, industrial step 3—identify the emissions
accordance with section 110 of the facilities, and area wide sources, such as reductions necessary to prevent an
CAA. consumer products and lawn and identified upwind state from
garden equipment. Scientific evidence contributing significantly to those
DATES: Written comments must be
indicates that adverse public health downwind air quality problems; and
received on or before August 6, 2018.
effects occur following exposure to step 4—adopt permanent and
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
ozone. Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03– requires states to submit, within three 3 All the other infrastructure SIP elements for the
OAR–2014–0701 at http:// years after promulgation of a new or District for the 2008 ozone NAAQS were addressed
www.regulations.gov, or via email to revised NAAQS, SIPs meeting the in a separate rulemaking. See 80 FR 19538 (May 13,
spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
applicable elements of sections 2015).
comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 110(a)(2).2 Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
4 NO SIP Call. 63 FR 57356 (October 27, 1998);
X
follow the online instructions for Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). 70 FR 25162 (May
generally requires SIPs to contain 12, 2005); Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR).
submitting comments. Once submitted, 75 FR 48208 (August 8, 2011); and CSAPR Update.
comments cannot be edited or removed 2 SIP revisions that are intended to meet the 81 FR 74504 (October 26, 2016).
requirements of section 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA 5 The four-step interstate framework has also been
1 The term state has the same meaning as are often referred to as infrastructure SIPs and the used to address requirements of the good neighbor
provided in CAA section 302(d) which specifically elements under 110(a)(2) are referred to as provision for some previous particulate matter (PM)
includes the District of Columbia. infrastructure requirements. NAAQS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Jul 03, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05JYP1.SGM 05JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_31477/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-07-03 23:40:36
Document Modified: 2018-07-03 23:40:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before August 6, 2018. | |
| Contact | David Talley, (215) 814-2117, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 31348 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR