83 FR 33892 - Air Plan Approval; Idaho; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 138 (July 18, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 138 (July 18, 2018)
| Page Range | 33892-33894 | |
| FR Document | 2018-15251 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 33892-33894] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-15251] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R10-OAR-2018-0509; FRL-9980-89--Region 10] Air Plan Approval; Idaho; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires each State Implementation Plan (SIP) to contain adequate provisions prohibiting emissions that will have certain adverse air quality effects in other states. On December 23, 2015, the State of Idaho made a submission to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to address these requirements. The EPA is proposing to approve the submission as meeting the requirement that each SIP contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions that will contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2012 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) in any other state. DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 17, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10- OAR-2018-0509 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air and Waste (OAW-150), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: (206) 553-0256; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: Table of Contents I. What is the background of this SIP submission? II. What guidance or information is the EPA using to evaluate this SIP submission? III. The EPA's Review IV. What action is the EPA taking? V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What is the background of this SIP submission? This rulemaking addresses a submission from the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) assessing interstate transport requirements for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The requirement for states to make a SIP submission of this type arises from section 110(a)(1) of the CAA. Pursuant to section 110(a)(1), states must submit within 3 years (or such shorter period as the Administrator may prescribe) after the promulgation of a national primary ambient air quality standard (or any revision thereof), a plan that provides for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of such NAAQS. The statute directly imposes on states the duty to make these SIP submissions, and the requirement to make the submissions is not conditioned upon the EPA taking any action other than promulgating a new or revised NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) includes a list of specific elements that ``[e]ach such plan'' submission must address. The EPA commonly refers to such state plans as ``infrastructure SIPs.'' Specifically, this rulemaking addresses the requirements under CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), otherwise known as the ``good neighbor'' provision, which requires SIPs to contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions that will contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS in any other state. II. What guidance or information is the EPA using to evaluate this SIP submission? The most recent relevant document was a memorandum published on March 17, 2016, titled ``Information on the Interstate Transport ``Good Neighbor'' Provision for the 2012 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)'' (memorandum). The memorandum describes the EPA's past approach to addressing interstate transport, and provides the EPA's general review of relevant modeling data and air quality projections as they relate to the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The memorandum provides information relevant to the EPA regional office review of the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) ``good neighbor'' provision in infrastructure SIPs with respect to the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. This rulemaking considers information provided in that memorandum. The memorandum also provides states and the EPA regional offices with future year annual PM2.5 design values for monitors in the United States based on quality assured and certified ambient monitoring data and air quality modeling. The memorandum describes how these projected potential design values can be used to help determine which monitors should be further evaluated to potentially address whether emissions from other states significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS at those sites. The memorandum explains that the pertinent year for evaluating air quality for purposes of addressing interstate transport for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS is 2021, the attainment deadline for 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS nonattainment areas classified as Moderate. [[Page 33893]] Based on this approach, the potential receptors are outlined in the memorandum. Most of the potential receptors are in California, located in the San Joaquin Valley or South Coast nonattainment areas. However, there is also one potential receptor in Shoshone County, Idaho, and one potential receptor in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The memorandum also indicates that for certain states with incomplete ambient monitoring data, additional information including the latest available data should be analyzed to determine whether there are potential downwind air quality problems that may be impacted by transported emissions. This rulemaking considers analysis in Idaho's submission, as well as additional analysis conducted by the EPA during review of its submission. For more information on how we conducted our analysis, please see the technical support document (TSD) included in the docket for this action. III. The EPA's Review This rulemaking proposes action on Idaho's December 23, 2015, SIP submission addressing the good neighbor provision requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). State plans must address specific requirements of the good neighbor provisions (commonly referred to as ``prongs''), including: --Prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from contributing significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS in another state (prong one); and --Prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS in another state (prong two). The EPA has developed a consistent framework for addressing the prong one and two interstate transport requirements with respect to the PM2.5 NAAQS in several previous federal rulemakings. The four basic steps of that framework include: (1) Identifying downwind receptors that are expected to have problems attaining or maintaining the relevant NAAQS; (2) identifying which upwind states contribute to these identified problems in amounts sufficient to warrant further review and analysis; (3) for states identified as contributing to downwind air quality problems, identifying upwind emissions reductions necessary to prevent an upwind state from significantly contributing to nonattainment or interfering with maintenance of the relevant NAAQS downwind; and (4) for states that are found to have emissions that significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the relevant NAAQS downwind, reducing the identified upwind emissions through adoption of permanent and enforceable measures. This framework was applied with respect to PM2.5 in the Cross- State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), designed to address both the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 standards, as well as the 1997 ozone standard.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Idaho was not part of the CSAPR rulemaking. The EPA approved the Idaho SIP as meeting the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requirements for the 1997 ozone and 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS on November 26, 2010 (75 FR 72705) and the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS on April 17, 2015 (80 FR 21181). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In its submission, IDEQ reviewed 2010 to 2014 air quality monitoring data to identify potential downwind receptors that may have problems attaining or maintaining the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. IDEQ then reviewed geographical distance, topography, meteorology (local air stagnation and prevailing wind patterns), Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment (IMPROVE) monitoring data and regional modeling conducted by the Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP), 2011 national emission inventory (NEI) data, and the EPA's technical support document for California areas designated as nonattainment for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.\2\ From this analysis IDEQ concluded that Idaho does not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See California: Imperial County, Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, Plumas County, San Joaquin Valley Area Designations for the 2012 Primary Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard Technical Support Document. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As discussed in the TSD for this action, we came to the same conclusion as the state. In our evaluation, potential downwind nonattainment and maintenance receptors were identified in other states. The EPA evaluated these potential receptors to determine first if, based on review of relevant data and other information, there would be downwind nonattainment or maintenance problems, and if so, whether Idaho contributes to such problems in these areas. After reviewing air quality reports, modeling results, designation letters, designation technical support documents, attainment plans and other information for these areas, we find there is no contribution sufficient to warrant additional SIP measures. Therefore, we are proposing to approve the Idaho SIP as meeting CAA section 110(a)(2)(i)(I) interstate transport requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. IV. What action is the EPA taking? The EPA is proposing to approve IDEQ's December 23, 2015, submission certifying that the Idaho SIP is sufficient to meet the interstate transport requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), specifically prongs one and two, as set forth above. The EPA is requesting comments on the proposed approval. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because [[Page 33894]] application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: July 3, 2018. Chris Hladick, Regional Administrator, Region 10. [FR Doc. 2018-15251 Filed 7-17-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![33892 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules
obligations discussed herein do not received to its public docket. Do not the EPA taking any action other than
apply to Indian tribes and thus this submit electronically any information promulgating a new or revised NAAQS.
proposed action will not impose you consider to be Confidential Section 110(a)(2) includes a list of
substantial direct costs on tribal Business Information (CBI) or other specific elements that ‘‘[e]ach such
governments or preempt tribal law. information the disclosure of which is plan’’ submission must address. The
restricted by statute. Multimedia EPA commonly refers to such state
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be plans as ‘‘infrastructure SIPs.’’
Environmental protection, Air accompanied by a written comment. Specifically, this rulemaking addresses
pollution control, Incorporation by The written comment is considered the the requirements under CAA section
reference, Intergovernmental relations, official comment and should include 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), otherwise known as
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, discussion of all points you wish to the ‘‘good neighbor’’ provision, which
Reporting and recordkeeping make. The EPA will generally not requires SIPs to contain adequate
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile consider comments or comment provisions to prohibit emissions that
organic compounds. contents located outside of the primary will contribute significantly to
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or nonattainment or interfere with
Dated: June 25, 2018. other file sharing system). For maintenance of the NAAQS in any other
Debra H. Thomas,
additional submission methods, the full state.
EPA public comment policy,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. II. What guidance or information is the
information about CBI or multimedia
Dated: June 26, 2018. EPA using to evaluate this SIP
submissions, and general guidance on
Chris Hladick, submission?
making effective comments, please visit
Regional Administrator, Region 10. https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ The most recent relevant document
[FR Doc. 2018–15343 Filed 7–17–18; 8:45 am] commenting-epa-dockets. was a memorandum published on
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff March 17, 2016, titled ‘‘Information on
Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air the Interstate Transport ‘‘Good
and Waste (OAW–150), Environmental Neighbor’’ Provision for the 2012 Fine
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Particulate Matter National Ambient Air
AGENCY Sixth Ave, Suite 155, Seattle, WA Quality Standards under Clean Air Act
98101; telephone number: (206) 553– Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)’’
40 CFR Part 52
0256; email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov. (memorandum). The memorandum
[EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0509; FRL–9980– SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: describes the EPA’s past approach to
89—Region 10] Throughout this document whenever addressing interstate transport, and
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean provides the EPA’s general review of
Air Plan Approval; Idaho; Interstate relevant modeling data and air quality
Transport Requirements for the 2012 the EPA. This supplementary
information section is arranged as projections as they relate to the 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The
follows:
AGENCY: Environmental Protection memorandum provides information
Table of Contents relevant to the EPA regional office
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule. I. What is the background of this SIP review of the CAA section
submission? 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) ‘‘good neighbor’’
SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) II. What guidance or information is the EPA provision in infrastructure SIPs with
requires each State Implementation Plan using to evaluate this SIP submission? respect to the 2012 annual PM2.5
(SIP) to contain adequate provisions III. The EPA’s Review
NAAQS. This rulemaking considers
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
prohibiting emissions that will have V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews information provided in that
certain adverse air quality effects in memorandum.
other states. On December 23, 2015, the I. What is the background of this SIP The memorandum also provides
State of Idaho made a submission to the submission? states and the EPA regional offices with
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) This rulemaking addresses a future year annual PM2.5 design values
to address these requirements. The EPA submission from the Idaho Department for monitors in the United States based
is proposing to approve the submission of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) on quality assured and certified ambient
as meeting the requirement that each assessing interstate transport monitoring data and air quality
SIP contain adequate provisions to requirements for the 2012 annual PM2.5 modeling. The memorandum describes
prohibit emissions that will contribute NAAQS. The requirement for states to how these projected potential design
significantly to nonattainment or make a SIP submission of this type values can be used to help determine
interfere with maintenance of the 2012 arises from section 110(a)(1) of the CAA. which monitors should be further
annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) Pursuant to section 110(a)(1), states evaluated to potentially address
national ambient air quality standard must submit within 3 years (or such whether emissions from other states
(NAAQS) in any other state. shorter period as the Administrator may significantly contribute to
DATES: Comments must be received on prescribe) after the promulgation of a nonattainment or interfere with
or before August 17, 2018. national primary ambient air quality maintenance of the 2012 annual PM2.5
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, standard (or any revision thereof), a NAAQS at those sites. The
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– plan that provides for the memorandum explains that the
OAR–2018–0509 at https:// implementation, maintenance, and pertinent year for evaluating air quality
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online enforcement of such NAAQS. The for purposes of addressing interstate
instructions for submitting comments. statute directly imposes on states the transport for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS is
Once submitted, comments cannot be duty to make these SIP submissions, 2021, the attainment deadline for 2012
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. and the requirement to make the PM2.5 NAAQS nonattainment areas
The EPA may publish any comment submissions is not conditioned upon classified as Moderate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:43 Jul 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM 18JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_34030/page/1.svg)
![33894 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules
application of those requirements would submitting comments. Once submitted, and maintenance of the National
be inconsistent with the CAA; and comments cannot be edited or removed Ambient Air Quality Standards
• Does not provide EPA with the from Regulations.gov. For either manner (NAAQS). Parts C and D of the CAA
discretionary authority to address, as of submission, EPA may publish any (sections 160 through 190) require the
appropriate, disproportionate human comment received to its public docket. establishment of a New Source Review
health or environmental effects, using Do not submit electronically any (NSR) program for sources whose
practicable and legally permissible information you consider to be Potential to Emit (PTE) is above certain
methods, under Executive Order 12898 Confidential Business Information (CBI) air pollution thresholds. For such
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). or other information whose disclosure is ‘‘major sources,’’ Prevention of
In addition, the SIP is not approved restricted by statute. Multimedia Significant Deterioration (PSD)
to apply on any Indian reservation land submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be provisions will generally apply in areas
or in any other area where EPA or an accompanied by a written comment. that have attained the NAAQS, while
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a The written comment is considered the Nonattainment New Source Review
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of official comment and should include (NNSR) provisions will apply in areas
Indian country, the rule does not have discussion of all points you wish to that have not attained the NAAQS.
tribal implications and will not impose make. EPA will generally not consider The permitting program for minor
substantial direct costs on tribal comments or comment contents located sources is addressed by section
governments or preempt tribal law as outside of the primary submission (i.e. 110(a)(2)(C) of the CAA. A minor source
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 on the web, cloud, or other file sharing is one whose PTE is lower than the
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). system). For additional submission major NSR applicability threshold for a
methods, please contact the person particular pollutant. States must
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 develop minor NSR programs to comply
identified in the FOR FURTHER
Environmental protection, Air INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the with the Federal requirements for state
pollution control, Incorporation by full EPA public comment policy, minor NSR programs contained in 40
reference, Intergovernmental relations, information about CBI or multimedia CFR 51.160 through 51.164. The
Particulate matter, Reporting and submissions, and general guidance on provisions of a minor NSR program
recordkeeping requirements. making effective comments, please visit must include legally enforceable
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ procedures that enable the permitting
Dated: July 3, 2018.
commenting-epa-dockets. authority to determine whether the
Chris Hladick, construction or modification of a source
Regional Administrator, Region 10. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
will result in a violation of applicable
[FR Doc. 2018–15251 Filed 7–17–18; 8:45 am] Danny Marcus, Environmental Engineer,
portions of the control strategy or
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Air Permits Section, Air Programs interfere with attainment or
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental maintenance of a NAAQS. 40 CFR
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 51.160(a).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois The minor NSR requirements are
AGENCY 60604, (312) 353–8781, marcus.danny@ considerably less prescriptive than
epa.gov. those for major sources. EPA has long
40 CFR Part 52 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: recognized that such rules are an
[EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0276; FRL–9980– Throughout this document whenever effective means to ensure that sources
93—Region 5] ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean whose emissions are less than the major
EPA. This supplementary information source thresholds are nonetheless
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Permit-by- section is arranged as follows: reviewed to ensure protection of the
Rule Provisions I. Background NAAQS. See, e.g., 76 FR 38748, 38752
A. Minor New Source Review (July 1, 2011). The Illinois
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
B. Title V Operating Permit Program Environmental Protection Agency
Agency (EPA). C. Permits-by-Rule (IEPA) implements the minor source
ACTION: Proposed rule. II. Discussion of the State’s Submittal NSR program under 35 Illinois
A. Rule Revisions That EPA Is Proposing Administrative Code (IAC) 201. EPA
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection To Approve
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve approved Illinois’ minor NSR program
B. Rule Revision for Which EPA Is Taking
revisions to the Illinois State No Action
on December 17, 1992 (57 FR 59928).
Implementation Plan (SIP) to establish a III. What is EPA’s analysis? B. Title V Operating Permit Program
general framework for permits-by-rule A. The Revisions Are Consistent With
Section 110(a)(2)(C) of the CAA and the Title V of the CAA (sections 501
(PBR) and specifically provide a PBR for through 507) requires that all major
small boilers. In addition, EPA is Applicable Regulations
B. The Revisions Do Not Interfere With stationary sources have permits that
proposing to approve other state Any Applicable CAA Requirement contain all requirements that are
provisions that are affected by the Under Section 110(l) of the CAA applicable under the CAA, as well as
addition of the PBR regulations, as well IV. What action is EPA taking? adequate monitoring. Title V and its
as minor changes in nomenclature. V. Incorporation by Reference implementing regulations at 40 CFR part
DATES: Comments must be received on VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 70 provide for the establishment of
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
or before August 17, 2018. I. Background comprehensive State air quality
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, operating permitting programs
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– A. Minor New Source Review consistent with the requirements of title
OAR–2017–0276 at http:// Section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air V. The title V operating permit program
www.regulations.gov, or via email to Act (CAA) requires that every SIP in Illinois, which EPA fully approved
damico.genevieve@epa.gov. For include a program to regulate the on November 30, 2001, is referred to as
comments submitted at Regulations.gov, construction and modification of the Clean Air Act Permit Program or
follow the online instructions for stationary sources to ensure attainment ‘‘CAAPP’’ (66 FR 62946, December 4,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:43 Jul 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM 18JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_34030/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-06 10:25:05
Document Modified: 2018-11-06 10:25:05
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before August 17, 2018. | |
| Contact | Jeff Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air and Waste (OAW-150), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: (206) | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 33892 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR