83 FR 38033 - Air Plan Approval and Air Quality Designation; MO; Redesignation of the Missouri Portion of the St. Louis Missouri-Illinois Area to Attainment of the 1997 Annual Standards for Fine Particulate Matter and Approval of Associated Maintenance Plan
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 150 (August 3, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 150 (August 3, 2018)
| Page Range | 38033-38036 | |
| FR Document | 2018-16003 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 38033-38036] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-16003] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 [EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0734; FRL 9981-29-Region 7] Air Plan Approval and Air Quality Designation; MO; Redesignation of the Missouri Portion of the St. Louis Missouri-Illinois Area to Attainment of the 1997 Annual Standards for Fine Particulate Matter and Approval of Associated Maintenance Plan AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On January 5, 2018, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published in the Federal Register an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) specifically requesting early input and comments on the Agency's interpretation that air quality monitoring data from 2015- 2017 support a finding that the Missouri Portion of the St. Louis nonattainment area attains the 1997 Annual National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ). The notice also provided an evaluation of Missouri's 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS maintenance plan, which includes the 2008 and 2025 NOX and PM2.5 motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) and established the 2008 base year emissions inventory. EPA received no comments on the ANPR. EPA is now taking direct final action on three items, consistent with the ANPR. First, EPA is approving the state's request to redesignate the Missouri portion of the St. Louis MO-IL nonattainment area to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS as the monitoring values demonstrate the area attains the standard. Second, EPA is approving the state implementation plan (SIP) revision containing a maintenance plan for the [[Page 38034]] Missouri portion of the area including the motor vehicle emissions budget. Third, EPA is approving Missouri's 2008 base year emissions inventory in accordance with section 172(c)(3) of the CAA. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective October 2, 2018, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by September 4, 2018. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07- OAR-2017-0734, to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7214, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by addressing the following: I. What is being addressed in this document? II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? III. What action is EPA taking? IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What is being addressed in this document? EPA is approving actions related to Missouri's request to redesignate the Missouri portion of the St. Louis area to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 standards. On September 2, 2011, and subsequently on March 31, 2014, and on September 17, 2014,\1\ Missouri, through the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) submitted requests for EPA to redesignate the Missouri portion of the St. Louis MO-IL nonattainment area to attainment for the 1997 Annual National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) and approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision containing a maintenance plan for the Missouri portion of the area. On January 5, 2018, EPA published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on the related actions and received no comments. See 83 FR 636. In this rulemaking action, EPA is taking direct final action to approve the state's request. In addition, EPA is also taking direct final action to approve Missouri's 2008 base year emissions inventory in accordance with section 172(c)(3) of the CAA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The date of the original submission is September 2, 2011. Missouri supplemented and revised their request on March 31, 2014, September 17, 2014, and May 23, 2017. The May 27, 2017, letter requested EPA to take action on the prior submission, but did not include additional documentation. EPA considered all submissions in reviewing this action. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? The state's submission has met the public notice requirements for the redesignation request and maintenance plan submission in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The state held a public comment period from December 30, 2013 to February 6, 2014, and received three comments from the EPA. A public hearing was held on January 30, 2014. III. What action is EPA taking? Consistent with the strategy outlined in the ANPR, published in January 2018, EPA is taking direct final action to approve Missouri's request to redesignate the St. Louis bi-state nonattainment area for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision containing a maintenance plan for the Missouri portion of the area, and officially redesignate the area from nonattainment to attainment. EPA is also taking direct final action on Missouri's 2008 emission inventory. Missouri submitted their first request to determine attainment and redesignation on September 1, 2011. The state then supplemented and revised their request on March 31, 2014, and on September 17, 2014. In this direct final rule, when EPA refers to Missouri's submission, we are referring to information provided in the 2011 and 2014 submissions and the additional clarifying information together unless otherwise specified. EPA evaluated Missouri's request and plan consistent with section 175A of the CAA and EPA's supplemental analysis that the area will continue to maintain the 2008 ozone NAAQS following redesignation. The Missouri counties comprising the St. Louis area are Franklin, Jefferson, St. Charles and St. Louis. The City of St. Louis is also part of the nonattainment area. Because we did not receive public comments on the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking for this action, we are publishing this as a direct final rule as we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); [[Page 38035]] Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866. Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not involve technical standards; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 40 CFR Part 81 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Designations and classifications, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: July 16, 2018. James B. Gulliford, Regional Administrator, Region 7. For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts 52 and 81 as set forth below: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart AA--Missouri * * * * * 0 2. Revise Sec. 52.1341 to read as follows: Sec. 52.1341 Control strategy: Particulate. (a) Determination of attainment. EPA has determined, as of May 23, 2011, that the St. Louis (MO-IL) metropolitan 1997 PM 2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further progress, contingency measures, and other plan elements related to attainment of the standards for as long as the area continues to meet the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. In addition, based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the three-year period 2007 to 2009, the St. Louis (MO-IL) PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. (b) Redesignation to attainment. On September 1, 2011, and on March 31, 2014 and on September 17, 2014, Missouri submitted requests to redesignate the Missouri portion of the St. Louis MO-IL area to attainment of the 1997 Annual PM2.5 standard. The Missouri portion of the St. Louis MO-IL area includes Jefferson, Franklin, St. Charles, and St. Louis Counties along with the City of St. Louis. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a plan for maintaining the 1997 Annual PM2.5 standard through 2025 in the area as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES 0 3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart C--Section 107 Attainment Status Designations * * * * * 0 4. Section 81.326 is amended by revising the entry for ``St. Louis MO- IL'' in the table entitled ``Missouri--1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS (Primary and Secondary)'' to read as follows: Sec. 81.326 Missouri * * * * * Missouri-1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS [Primary and secondary] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Designation \a\ Classification Designated area ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date \1\ Type Date \2\ Type ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- St. Louis, MO-IL: Franklin County.................... August 3, 2018........... Attainment ........... ........... Jefferson County................... August 3, 2018........... Attainment ........... ........... St. Charles County................. August 3, 2018........... Attainment ........... ........... [[Page 38036]] St. Louis County................... August 3, 2018........... Attainment ........... ........... St. Louis City..................... August 3, 2018........... Attainment ........... ........... * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \a\ Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. \1\ This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted. \2\ This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2018-16003 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 38033
power and responsibilities among the G. Protest Activities servicing, and emergency response
various levels of government. We have The Coast Guard respects the First operations.
analyzed this rule under that Order and Amendment rights of protesters. (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
have determined that it is consistent Protesters are asked to contact the Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
with the fundamental federalism person listed in the FOR FURTHER enforcement of the safety zone by
principles and preemption requirements INFORMATION CONTACT section to
Federal, State, and local agencies.
described in Executive Order 13132. coordinate protest activities so that your (e) Enforcement period. This zone
message can be received without will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. through
Also, this rule does not have tribal
jeopardizing the safety or security of 9:30 p.m. on August 4, 2018.
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination people, places or vessels. Dated: July 30, 2018.
with Indian Tribal Governments, S.E. Anderson,
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
because it does not have a substantial Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the
direct effect on one or more Indian Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Port Delaware Bay.
tribes, on the relationship between the (water), Reporting and recordkeeping [FR Doc. 2018–16620 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
Federal Government and Indian tribes, requirements, Security measures, BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
or on the distribution of power and Waterways.
responsibilities between the Federal For the reasons discussed in the
Government and Indian tribes. If you preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
believe this rule has implications for CFR part 165 as follows: AGENCY
federalism or Indian tribes, please
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
contact the person listed in the FOR
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section [EPA–R07–OAR–2017–0734; FRL 9981–29-
above. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Region 7]
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act continues to read as follows:
Air Plan Approval and Air Quality
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Designation; MO; Redesignation of the
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Missouri Portion of the St. Louis
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
Missouri-Illinois Area to Attainment of
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
the 1997 Annual Standards for Fine
their discretionary regulatory actions. In ■ 2. Add § 165.T05-0614 to read as Particulate Matter and Approval of
particular, the Act addresses actions follows: Associated Maintenance Plan
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the § 165.T05–0614 Safety Zone; Fireworks, AGENCY: Environmental Protection
aggregate, or by the private sector of Shark River, Neptune, NJ. Agency (EPA).
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or (a) Location. The following area is a ACTION: Direct final rule.
more in any one year. Though this rule safety zone: All waters of the Shark
will not result in such an expenditure, River off of Neptune, NJ, within 100 SUMMARY: On January 5, 2018, the
we do discuss the effects of this rule yards of the barge anchored in position Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
elsewhere in this preamble. 40°11′32.08″ N, 074°01′53.06″ W. All published in the Federal Register an
coordinates are based on Datum NAD advanced notice of proposed
F. Environment 1983. rulemaking (ANPR) specifically
(b) Definitions. As used in this requesting early input and comments on
We have analyzed this rule under
section, designated representative the Agency’s interpretation that air
Department of Homeland Security
means a Coast Guard Patrol quality monitoring data from 2015–2017
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Commander, including a Coast Guard support a finding that the Missouri
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the petty officer, warrant or commissioned Portion of the St. Louis nonattainment
Coast Guard in complying with the officer on board a Coast Guard vessel or area attains the 1997 Annual National
National Environmental Policy Act of on board a federal, state, or local law Ambient Air Quality Standards
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have enforcement vessel assisting the Captain (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter
determined that this action is one of a of the Port (COTP), Delaware Bay in the (PM2.5). The notice also provided an
category of actions that do not enforcement of the safety zone. evaluation of Missouri’s 1997 Annual
individually or cumulatively have a (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general PM2.5 NAAQS maintenance plan, which
significant effect on the human safety zone regulations in subpart C of includes the 2008 and 2025 NOX and
environment. This rule involves a safety this part, you may not enter the safety PM2.5 motor vehicle emission budgets
zone that will prohibit persons and zone described in paragraph (a) of this (MVEBs) and established the 2008 base
vessels from entering, transiting section unless authorized by the COTP year emissions inventory. EPA received
through, anchoring in, or remaining or the COTP’s designated representative. no comments on the ANPR. EPA is now
within a limited area on the navigable (2) To seek permission to enter or taking direct final action on three items,
water in the Shark River, for remain in the zone, contact the COTP or consistent with the ANPR. First, EPA is
approximately one hour. This rule is the COTP’s representative via VHF–FM approving the state’s request to
categorically excluded from further channel 16 or 215–271–4807. Those in redesignate the Missouri portion of the
review under paragraph L60(a) of the safety zone must comply with all St. Louis MO–IL nonattainment area to
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction lawful orders or directions given to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A them by the COTP or the COTP’s NAAQS as the monitoring values
Record of Environmental Consideration designated representative. demonstrate the area attains the
(REC) supporting this determination is (3) This section applies to all vessels standard. Second, EPA is approving the
available in the docket where indicated except those engaged in law state implementation plan (SIP) revision
under ADDRESSES. enforcement, aids to navigation containing a maintenance plan for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:08 Aug 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM 03AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_38183/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 38035
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 submit a rule report, which includes a the St. Louis (MO–IL) metropolitan 1997
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory copy of the rule, to each House of the PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained
action because SIP approvals are Congress and to the Comptroller General the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This
exempted under Executive Order 12866. of the United States. EPA will submit a determination, in accordance with 40
• Does not impose an information report containing this action and other CFR 51.1004(c), suspends the
collection burden under the provisions required information to the U.S. Senate, requirements for this area to submit an
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 the U.S. House of Representatives, and attainment demonstration, associated
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); the Comptroller General of the United reasonably available control measures,
• Is certified as not having a States prior to publication of the rule in reasonable further progress, contingency
significant economic impact on a the Federal Register. A major rule measures, and other plan elements
substantial number of small entities cannot take effect until 60 days after it related to attainment of the standards
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 is published in the Federal Register. for as long as the area continues to meet
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. In addition,
• Does not contain any unfunded defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). based upon EPA’s review of the air
mandate or significantly or uniquely quality data for the three-year period
affect small governments, as described List of Subjects
2007 to 2009, the St. Louis (MO–IL)
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 40 CFR Part 52 PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by the
• Does not have Federalism Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by applicable attainment date of April 5,
implications as specified in Executive 2010.
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, reference, Intergovernmental relations,
1999); Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, (b) Redesignation to attainment. On
• Is not an economically significant Reporting and recordkeeping September 1, 2011, and on March 31,
regulatory action based on health or requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 2014 and on September 17, 2014,
safety risks subject to Executive Order organic compounds. Missouri submitted requests to
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); redesignate the Missouri portion of the
40 CFR Part 81
• Is not a significant regulatory action St. Louis MO–IL area to attainment of
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Environmental protection, the 1997 Annual PM2.5 standard. The
28355, May 22, 2001); Administrative practice and procedure, Missouri portion of the St. Louis MO–
• Is not subject to requirements of the Air pollution control, Designations and IL area includes Jefferson, Franklin, St.
National Technology Transfer and classifications, Intergovernmental Charles, and St. Louis Counties along
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate with the City of St. Louis. As part of the
rulemaking does not involve technical matter, Reporting and recordkeeping redesignation request, the State
standards; and requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile submitted a plan for maintaining the
• Does not provide EPA with the organic compounds. 1997 Annual PM2.5 standard through
discretionary authority to address, as Dated: July 16, 2018. 2025 in the area as required by section
appropriate, disproportionate human James B. Gulliford, 175A of the Clean Air Act.
health or environmental effects, using Regional Administrator, Region 7.
practicable and legally permissible PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
methods, under Executive Order 12898 For the reasons stated in the FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts 52 PURPOSES
In addition, the SIP is not approved and 81 as set forth below:
to apply on any Indian reservation land ■ 3. The authority citation for part 81
or in any other area where EPA or an PART 52—APPROVAL AND continues to read as follows:
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment
tribal implications and will not impose continues to read as follows: Status Designations
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. * * * * *
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Subpart AA—Missouri ■ 4. Section 81.326 is amended by
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). revising the entry for ‘‘St. Louis MO–IL’’
The Congressional Review Act, 5 * * * * * in the table entitled ‘‘Missouri—1997
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small ■ 2. Revise § 52.1341 to read as follows: Annual PM2.5 NAAQS (Primary and
Business Regulatory Enforcement Secondary)’’ to read as follows:
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides § 52.1341 Control strategy: Particulate.
that before a rule may take effect, the (a) Determination of attainment. EPA § 81.326 Missouri
agency promulgating the rule must has determined, as of May 23, 2011, that * * * * *
MISSOURI–1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 NAAQS
[Primary and secondary]
Designation a Classification
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Designated area
Date 1 Type Date 2 Type
St. Louis, MO–IL:
Franklin County ........................................................ August 3, 2018 ................... Attainment
Jefferson County ...................................................... August 3, 2018 ................... Attainment
St. Charles County .................................................. August 3, 2018 ................... Attainment
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:08 Aug 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM 03AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_38183/page/3.svg)
![38036 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
MISSOURI–1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 NAAQS—Continued
[Primary and secondary]
Designation a Classification
Designated area
Date 1 Type Date 2 Type
St. Louis County ...................................................... August 3, 2018 ................... Attainment
St. Louis City ........................................................... August 3, 2018 ................... Attainment
.
* * * * * * *
a Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
1 This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
2 This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * * ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Wednesday, July 25, 2018, make the
[FR Doc. 2018–16003 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am] AGENCY following correction:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 63 Table 1 to Subpart LLL of Part 63
[Corrected]
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0442; FRL–9981–06–
OAR] ■ On page 35135, the table should read
RIN 2060–AS92 as set forth below:
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants From the
Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry Residual Risk and
Technology Review
Correction
In rule document 2018–15718
beginning on page 35122 in the issue of
TABLE 1 TO SUBPART LLL OF PART 63—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS
Citation Requirement Applies to subpart LLL Explanation
* * * * * * *
63.10(e)(3)(v) .................... Due Dates for Excess Emissions and CMS Performance No § 63.1354(b)(9) specifies
Reports. due date.
* * * * * * *
[FR Doc. C1–2018–15718 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am] published a final rule which added SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D subsurface intrusion component to the EPA’s erratum to the final rule titled
Superfund Hazard Ranking System. Addition of a Subsurface Intrusion
That document inadvertently failed to Component to the Hazard Ranking
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION update the Table of Contents and System, published January 9, 2017 (82
AGENCY contained a few other typographical FR 2760). This is the second set of
errors. This document corrects the final corrections. The first set of corrections
40 CFR Part 300 regulation. was published in the Federal Register
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2010–1086; FRL–9979– on January 31, 2018 (83 FR 4430). This
DATES:This correction is effective document augments those corrections.
68–OLEM] August 3, 2018.
Section 553 of the Administrative
RIN 2050–AG67 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
Terry Jeng, phone: (703) 603–8852, 553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an
Addition of a Subsurface Intrusion
email: jeng.terry@epa.gov, Site agency for good cause finds that notice
Component to the Hazard Ranking
Assessment and Remedy Decisions and public procedure are impracticable,
System; Corrections
Branch, Assessment and Remediation unnecessary, or contrary to the public
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Division, Office of Superfund interest, the agency may issue a rule
Agency (EPA). Remediation and Technology without providing notice and an
ACTION: Correcting amendments. Innovation (Mailcode 5204P), U.S. opportunity for public comment. See
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Utility Solid Waste Activities Group v.
SUMMARY:On January 9, 2017, the Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, EPA, 236 F.3d 749, 752 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Environmental Protection Agency DC 20460. We have determined that there is good
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:08 Aug 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM 03AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_38183/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-06 10:34:47
Document Modified: 2018-11-06 10:34:47
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule will be effective October 2, 2018, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by September 4, 2018. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7214, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 38033 | |
| CFR Citation | 40
CFR
52 40 CFR 81 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides; Volatile Organic Compounds; Administrative Practice and Procedure and Designations and Classifications |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR