83 FR 38102 - Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Updates to Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program Regulation
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 150 (August 3, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 150 (August 3, 2018)
| Page Range | 38102-38103 | |
| FR Document | 2018-16623 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 38102-38103] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-16623] [[Page 38102]] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R01-OAR-2016-0398; FRL-9981-32--Region 1] Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Updates to Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program Regulation AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New Hampshire. This revision includes an amended regulation for the enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in New Hampshire. New Hampshire continues to implement a test and repair network for an on-board diagnostic (OBD2) testing program. The submitted New Hampshire regulation updates and clarifies the implementation of the New Hampshire I/M program. The intended effect of this action is to approve the updated I/M program regulation into the New Hampshire SIP. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 4, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01- OAR-2016-0398 at www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Publicly available docket materials are available at www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1 Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariel Garcia, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1 Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail code: OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, telephone number: (617) 918-1660, email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Table of Contents I. Background and Purpose II. Summary of New Hampshire's Regulatory Changes III. New Hampshire Satisfying Clean Air Act Requirements for I/M programs IV. Proposed Action V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background and Purpose On June 7, 2016, the State of New Hampshire submitted a formal revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). The submitted SIP revision included amendments to the New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules Chapter Saf-C 3200 entitled, ``Official Motor Vehicle Inspection Requirements,'' which update the enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in New Hampshire. New Hampshire previously submitted an I/M program SIP revision on November 17, 2011, which EPA approved into the New Hampshire SIP on January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292). New Hampshire's November 17, 2011 SIP revision included all the regulatory and technical documentation required in an I/M SIP submittal to address the requirements of EPA's I/M regulations. The emissions modeling, I/M SIP narrative, and other technical documentation, included in New Hampshire's November 17, 2011 submittal continue to be applicable as the technical demonstration that New Hampshire's implemented I/M program meets the requirements of EPA's I/M regulations. The regulatory amendments made by New Hampshire to regulation Saf-C 3200, submitted in the June 2016 SIP revision, do not reflect any changes to the technical implementation characteristics of the New Hampshire I/M program and thus result in no changes to the EPA- approved emissions modeling analysis. II. Summary of New Hampshire's Regulatory Changes New Hampshire's amended Saf-C 3200 regulation, submitted as a SIP revision on June 7, 2016, updates a number of regulatory provisions by adding language to clarify the I/M program requirements in New Hampshire. A summary of the most substantial changes made to New Hampshire's SIP-approved regulation follows. New Hampshire (1) added clarifying definitions to Saf-C 3202; (2) amended Saf-C 3203.03 to change the month by which government fleet vehicles need to be inspected, i.e. to September of each year; (3) amended Saf-C 3204.02 and adopted Saf-C 3205.11 to clarify both the required information to be submitted in an application to become an official inspection station, as well as the criteria for denying an application; and (4) amended Saf-C 3218 through Saf-C 3220 to clarify and update the criteria for performance or condition of vehicle components that will result in the rejection of a vehicle. III. New Hampshire Satisfying Clean Air Act Requirements for I/M Programs In this document, EPA is only proposing to update New Hampshire's I/M regulation by revising subsections or provisions of the regulation as it currently exists in the New Hampshire SIP.\1\ As stated earlier in this document, the remaining technical aspects (i.e., I/M SIP narrative, the emissions modeling, and other technical documentation) included in New Hampshire's November 17, 2011 SIP revision, and approved by EPA on January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292), continue to be applicable as the technical [[Page 38103]] demonstration that New Hampshire's implemented I/M program meets the requirements of EPA's I/M regulations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ EPA's January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292) approval of New Hampshire's November 17, 2011 I/M SIP submittal describes how New Hampshire's I/M program satisfies the OBD2 and other I/M regulatory requirements established by the Clean Air Act and EPA's I/M regulations. In addition, EPA's January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292) approval contains a detailed discussion of EPA's rationale for approving New Hampshire's November 17, 2011 I/M SIP revision and will not be restated in this document. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve New Hampshire's June 7, 2016 SIP revision request. This SIP revision request contains New Hampshire's revised motor vehicle I/M program regulation. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve amendments to the following New Hampshire Department of Safety Regulation Saf-C 3200 subsections or provisions as they currently exist in the New Hampshire SIP: Amendments to Saf-C 3202, Saf-C 3203, Saf-C 3204, Saf-C 3205, Saf-C 3206.04, Saf-C 3207.01, Saf-C 3209, Saf-C 3210, Saf-C 3218, Saf-C 3220, Saf-C 3222, and Saf-C 3248. In addition, EPA is proposing to approve Saf-C 3219 which had not previously been submitted for inclusion in the New Hampshire SIP. EPA is proposing to approve New Hampshire's June 7, 2016 SIP revision, containing New Hampshire's updated I/M program regulation, because it is consistent with the CAA's I/M requirements and EPA's I/M regulations, and will strengthen the SIP. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this notice or on other relevant matters. These comments will be considered before taking final action. Interested parties may participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to this proposed rule by following the instructions listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal Register. V. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the aforementioned New Hampshire Department of Safety Regulation Saf-C 3200 subsections identified in section IV of this proposal, except as set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 1 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). New Hampshire's I/M program regulation contains enforcement provisions that detail state enforcement procedures, including administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, and administrative and judicial procedures. Such enforcement-related provisions are required elements of an I/M SIP under 40 CFR 61.364, and EPA is proposing to approve the provisions as meeting those requirements. However, EPA is not proposing to incorporate those provisions by reference into the EPA-approved federal regulations at 40 CFR part 52. In any federal action to enforce violations of the substantive requirements of the New Hampshire I/M program, the relevant provisions of Section 113 or 304 of the CAA, rather than state enforcement provisions would govern. Similarly, the applicable procedures in any federal action would be the applicable federal court rules or EPA's rules for administrative proceedings at 40 CFR part 22, rather than state administrative procedures. Since the state enforcement provisions would not be applicable in a federal action, incorporating these state-only enforcement provisions into the federal regulations would have no effect. To avoid confusion to the public and regulated parties, EPA is not proposing to incorporate these provisions by reference into the EPA-approved federal regulations in the New Hampshire plan identification in 40 CFR part 52. Specifically, EPA is not proposing to incorporate New Hampshire's regulations Saf-C 3222.04(d) and Saf-C 3248 into the federal regulations at 40 CFR 52.1520(c). VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); This action is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866. Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: July 31, 2018. Alexandra Dunn, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1. [FR Doc. 2018-16623 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![38102 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION For the full EPA public comment policy, submittal continue to be applicable as
AGENCY information about CBI or multimedia the technical demonstration that New
submissions, and general guidance on Hampshire’s implemented I/M program
40 CFR Part 52 making effective comments, please visit meets the requirements of EPA’s I/M
[EPA–R01–OAR–2016–0398; FRL–9981– www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa- regulations. The regulatory amendments
32—Region 1] dockets. Publicly available docket made by New Hampshire to regulation
materials are available at Saf-C 3200, submitted in the June 2016
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. SIP revision, do not reflect any changes
Updates to Enhanced Motor Vehicle Environmental Protection Agency, EPA to the technical implementation
Inspection and Maintenance Program Region 1 Regional Office, Office of characteristics of the New Hampshire I/
Regulation Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality M program and thus result in no
Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square— changes to the EPA-approved emissions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests modeling analysis.
Agency (EPA). that if at all possible, you contact the II. Summary of New Hampshire’s
ACTION: Proposed rule. contact listed in the FOR FURTHER Regulatory Changes
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection schedule your inspection. The Regional New Hampshire’s amended Saf-C
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a Office’s official hours of business are 3200 regulation, submitted as a SIP
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to revision on June 7, 2016, updates a
revision submitted by the State of New 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays. number of regulatory provisions by
Hampshire. This revision includes an adding language to clarify the I/M
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
amended regulation for the enhanced program requirements in New
Ariel Garcia, Air Quality Planning Unit,
motor vehicle inspection and Hampshire. A summary of the most
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
maintenance (I/M) program in New substantial changes made to New
EPA Region 1 Regional Office, 5 Post
Hampshire. New Hampshire continues Hampshire’s SIP-approved regulation
Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail code:
to implement a test and repair network follows. New Hampshire (1) added
OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, clarifying definitions to Saf-C 3202; (2)
for an on-board diagnostic (OBD2)
telephone number: (617) 918–1660, amended Saf-C 3203.03 to change the
testing program. The submitted New
email: garcia.ariel@epa.gov. month by which government fleet
Hampshire regulation updates and
clarifies the implementation of the New SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: vehicles need to be inspected, i.e. to
Hampshire I/M program. The intended Throughout this document whenever September of each year; (3) amended
effect of this action is to approve the ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean Saf-C 3204.02 and adopted Saf-C
updated I/M program regulation into the EPA. 3205.11 to clarify both the required
New Hampshire SIP. This action is Table of Contents information to be submitted in an
being taken under the Clean Air Act. application to become an official
I. Background and Purpose inspection station, as well as the criteria
DATES: Written comments must be II. Summary of New Hampshire’s Regulatory
received on or before September 4, for denying an application; and (4)
Changes
2018. III. New Hampshire Satisfying Clean Air Act amended Saf-C 3218 through Saf-C 3220
Requirements for I/M programs to clarify and update the criteria for
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, IV. Proposed Action performance or condition of vehicle
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– V. Incorporation by Reference components that will result in the
OAR–2016–0398 at VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews rejection of a vehicle.
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
garcia.ariel@epa.gov. For comments I. Background and Purpose III. New Hampshire Satisfying Clean
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the On June 7, 2016, the State of New Air Act Requirements for I/M Programs
online instructions for submitting Hampshire submitted a formal revision In this document, EPA is only
comments. Once submitted, comments to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). proposing to update New Hampshire’s I/
cannot be edited or removed from The submitted SIP revision included M regulation by revising subsections or
Regulations.gov. For either manner of amendments to the New Hampshire provisions of the regulation as it
submission, the EPA may publish any Code of Administrative Rules Chapter currently exists in the New Hampshire
comment received to its public docket. Saf-C 3200 entitled, ‘‘Official Motor SIP.1 As stated earlier in this document,
Do not submit electronically any Vehicle Inspection Requirements,’’ the remaining technical aspects (i.e., I/
information you consider to be which update the enhanced motor M SIP narrative, the emissions
Confidential Business Information (CBI) vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/ modeling, and other technical
or other information whose disclosure is M) program in New Hampshire. documentation) included in New
restricted by statute. Multimedia New Hampshire previously submitted Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 SIP
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be an I/M program SIP revision on revision, and approved by EPA on
accompanied by a written comment. November 17, 2011, which EPA January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292), continue
The written comment is considered the approved into the New Hampshire SIP to be applicable as the technical
official comment and should include on January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292). New
discussion of all points you wish to Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 SIP 1 EPA’s January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292) approval
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
make. The EPA will generally not revision included all the regulatory and of New Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 I/M SIP
submittal describes how New Hampshire’s I/M
consider comments or comment technical documentation required in an program satisfies the OBD2 and other I/M
contents located outside of the primary I/M SIP submittal to address the regulatory requirements established by the Clean
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or requirements of EPA’s I/M regulations. Air Act and EPA’s I/M regulations. In addition,
other file sharing system). For The emissions modeling, I/M SIP EPA’s January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292) approval
contains a detailed discussion of EPA’s rationale for
additional submission methods, please narrative, and other technical approving New Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 I/
contact the person identified in the FOR documentation, included in New M SIP revision and will not be restated in this
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 document.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Aug 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM 03AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_38252/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules 38103
demonstration that New Hampshire’s administrative and judicial procedures. of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
implemented I/M program meets the Such enforcement-related provisions are U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
requirements of EPA’s I/M regulations. required elements of an I/M SIP under • Is certified as not having a
40 CFR 61.364, and EPA is proposing to significant economic impact on a
IV. Proposed Action
approve the provisions as meeting those substantial number of small entities
EPA is proposing to approve New requirements. However, EPA is not under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
Hampshire’s June 7, 2016 SIP revision proposing to incorporate those U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
request. This SIP revision request provisions by reference into the EPA-
contains New Hampshire’s revised approved federal regulations at 40 CFR • Does not contain any unfunded
motor vehicle I/M program regulation. part 52. In any federal action to enforce mandate or significantly or uniquely
Specifically, EPA is proposing to violations of the substantive affect small governments, as described
approve amendments to the following requirements of the New Hampshire I/ in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
New Hampshire Department of Safety M program, the relevant provisions of of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
Regulation Saf-C 3200 subsections or Section 113 or 304 of the CAA, rather • Does not have Federalism
provisions as they currently exist in the than state enforcement provisions implications as specified in Executive
New Hampshire SIP: Amendments to would govern. Similarly, the applicable Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
Saf–C 3202, Saf–C 3203, Saf–C 3204, procedures in any federal action would 1999);
Saf–C 3205, Saf–C 3206.04, Saf–C be the applicable federal court rules or • Is not an economically significant
3207.01, Saf–C 3209, Saf–C 3210, Saf– EPA’s rules for administrative regulatory action based on health or
C 3218, Saf–C 3220, Saf–C 3222, and proceedings at 40 CFR part 22, rather safety risks subject to Executive Order
Saf–C 3248. In addition, EPA is than state administrative procedures. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
proposing to approve Saf–C 3219 which Since the state enforcement provisions
had not previously been submitted for would not be applicable in a federal • Is not a significant regulatory action
inclusion in the New Hampshire SIP. action, incorporating these state-only subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
EPA is proposing to approve New enforcement provisions into the federal 28355, May 22, 2001);
Hampshire’s June 7, 2016 SIP revision, regulations would have no effect. To • Is not subject to requirements of
containing New Hampshire’s updated I/ avoid confusion to the public and Section 12(d) of the National
M program regulation, because it is regulated parties, EPA is not proposing Technology Transfer and Advancement
consistent with the CAA’s I/M to incorporate these provisions by Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
requirements and EPA’s I/M regulations, reference into the EPA-approved federal application of those requirements would
and will strengthen the SIP. EPA is regulations in the New Hampshire plan be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
soliciting public comments on the identification in 40 CFR part 52. and
issues discussed in this notice or on Specifically, EPA is not proposing to
other relevant matters. These comments • Does not provide EPA with the
incorporate New Hampshire’s
will be considered before taking final discretionary authority to address, as
regulations Saf-C 3222.04(d) and Saf-C
action. Interested parties may appropriate, disproportionate human
3248 into the federal regulations at 40
participate in the Federal rulemaking health or environmental effects, using
CFR 52.1520(c).
procedure by submitting written practicable and legally permissible
comments to this proposed rule by VI. Statutory and Executive Order methods, under Executive Order 12898
following the instructions listed in the Reviews (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
ADDRESSES section of this Federal Under the Clean Air Act, the In addition, the SIP is not approved
Register. Administrator is required to approve a to apply on any Indian reservation land
SIP submission that complies with the or in any other area where EPA or an
V. Incorporation by Reference provisions of the Act and applicable Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
include in a final EPA rule regulatory 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP Indian country, the rule does not have
text that includes incorporation by submissions, EPA’s role is to approve tribal implications and will not impose
reference. In accordance with state choices, provided that they meet substantial direct costs on tribal
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is the criteria of the Clean Air Act. governments or preempt tribal law as
proposing to incorporate by reference Accordingly, this proposed action specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
the aforementioned New Hampshire merely approves state law as meeting FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Department of Safety Regulation Saf-C Federal requirements and does not
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
3200 subsections identified in section impose additional requirements beyond
IV of this proposal, except as set forth those imposed by state law. For that Environmental protection, Air
below. The EPA has made, and will reason, this proposed action: pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
continue to make, these documents • Is not a significant regulatory action Incorporation by reference,
generally available through subject to review by the Office of Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Management and Budget under Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
Region 1 Office (please contact the Executive Orders12866 (58 FR 51735, matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
person identified in the FOR FURTHER October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this January 21, 2011); organic compounds.
preamble for more information). • This action is not expected to be an
Dated: July 31, 2018.
New Hampshire’s I/M program Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
regulation contains enforcement because this action is not significant Alexandra Dunn,
provisions that detail state enforcement under Executive Order 12866. Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
procedures, including administrative, • Does not impose an information [FR Doc. 2018–16623 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
civil, and criminal penalties, and collection burden under the provisions BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Aug 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM 03AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_38252/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-06 10:35:09
Document Modified: 2018-11-06 10:35:09
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before September 4, 2018. | |
| Contact | Ariel Garcia, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1 Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail code: OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, telephone number: (617) 918-1660, email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 38102 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR