83_FR_38337 83 FR 38187 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Exchange Rule 11.13, Order Execution and Routing, To Amend the Operation of the Super Aggressive Order Instruction

83 FR 38187 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Exchange Rule 11.13, Order Execution and Routing, To Amend the Operation of the Super Aggressive Order Instruction

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 150 (August 3, 2018)

Page Range38187-38191
FR Document2018-16596

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38187-38191]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83738; File No. SR-CboeBYX-2018-012]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to 
Exchange Rule 11.13, Order Execution and Routing, To Amend the 
Operation of the Super Aggressive Order Instruction

July 30, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on July 16, 2018, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BYX'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items 
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this 
proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ 
which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend paragraph (b)(4)(C) of 
Exchange Rule 11.13 related to Super Aggressive order instructions.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the description of the Super 
Aggressive Re-Route instruction (``Super Aggressive instruction'') 
under paragraph (b)(4)(C) of Exchange Rule 11.13, Order Execution and 
Routing to: (i) Specify that an incoming BYX Post Only Order or Partial 
Post Only at Limit Order that would lock a resting order with a Super 
Aggressive instruction must be designated as eligible for display on 
the Exchange (a ``displayed order'') for the order with a Super 
Aggressive instruction to engage in a liquidity swap and execute 
against that incoming order; and (ii) modify language from the 
description of the Super Aggressive instruction that states if an order 
that does not contain a Super Aggressive instruction maintains higher 
priority than one or more Super Aggressive eligible orders, the Super 
Aggressive eligible order(s) with lower priority would not be converted 
and an incoming BYX Post Only Order or Partial Post Only at Limit Order 
would be posted or cancelled in accordance with Exchange Rule 
11.9(c)(6) or 11.9(c)(7).
    At the outset, the Exchange notes that based on the Exchange's 
current pricing schedule, because BYX offers rebates to remove 
liquidity and charges fees to add liquidity, BYX Post Only Orders and 
Partial Post Only at Limit Orders remove liquidity on entry against 
resting interest and are not booked/displayed if there is contra-side 
interest. As such, the descriptions below of the changes to Rule 
11.13(b)(4)(C), including the examples of the revised operation of the 
Super Aggressive functionality are currently inapplicable because BYX 
Post Only Orders and Partial Post Only at Limit Orders execute against 
resting liquidity first, before the logic discussed below is triggered. 
However, consistent with its prior practice, the Exchange is proposing 
the changes to Rule 11.13(b)(4)(C) related to the Super Aggressive 
instruction in this filing in order to retain consistent rules and 
functionality with its affiliated exchanges \5\ to the extent the 
Exchange decides to propose changes to its fee structure in the future 
such that ``Post Only'' functionality is more relevant to the operation 
of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange notes that its affiliates, Cboe BZX Exchange, 
Inc. and Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc., also recently filed to adopt the 
functionality described in this filing and such functionality is 
applicable on such exchanges because orders equivalent to BYX Post 
Only Orders and/or Partial Post Only at Limit Orders can be entered 
on such exchanges and do not always remove against contra-side 
interest on entry pursuant to such exchanges' fee schedules. See SR-
CboeBZX-2018-051 and SR-CboeEDGX-2018-025, each filed July 11, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Super Aggressive is an optional order instruction that directs the 
System \6\ to route an order when an away Trading Center locks or 
crosses the limit price of the order resting on the BYX Book.\7\ If an 
order with a Super Aggressive instruction were to be locked by an 
incoming BYX Post Only Order or Partial Post Only at Limit Order 
(hereafter collectively referred to as a ``Post Only Order'') that does 
not remove liquidity pursuant to Rule 11.9(c)(6) or 11.9(c)(7), 
respectively,\8\

[[Page 38188]]

the order with a Super Aggressive instruction would be converted to an 
executable order and would remove liquidity against such incoming 
order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The term ``System'' is defined as ``the electronic 
communications and trading facility designated by the Board through 
which securities orders of Users are consolidated for ranking, 
execution and, when applicable, routing away.'' See Exchange Rule 
1.5(aa).
    \7\ See Exchange Rule 1.5(e).
    \8\ A BYX Post Only Order will remove contra-side liquidity from 
the BYX Book if the order is an order to buy or sell a security 
priced below $1.00 or if the value of such execution when removing 
liquidity equals or exceeds the value of such execution if the order 
instead posted to the BYX Book and subsequently provided liquidity, 
including the applicable fees charged or rebates provided. See 
Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(6). A Partial Post Only at Limit Order will 
remove liquidity from the BYX Book up to the full size of the order 
if, at the time of receipt, it can be executed at prices better than 
its limit price. See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(7). As noted above, due 
to the current BYX pricing schedule, which offers rebates to remove 
liquidity, Post Only Orders are not booked/displayed if there is 
contra-side interest and instead remove liquidity against resting 
interest. Accordingly, an order with a Super Aggressive instruction 
will not be converted under the current fee schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, the Exchange proposes to modify the Super Aggressive 
instruction to require that the incoming Post Only Order that would 
lock a resting order with a Super Aggressive instruction must be 
designated as a displayed order for an execution to occur. The Super 
Aggressive instruction is generally utilized for best execution 
purposes because it enables the order to immediately attempt to access 
displayed liquidity on another Trading Center that is either priced 
equal to or better than the order with a Super Aggressive instruction's 
limit price. The Super Aggressive instruction would also enable the 
order to execute against an equally priced incoming Post Only Order 
that would otherwise not execute by being willing to act as the 
liquidity remover in such a scenario.\9\ Under BYX Rules, the incoming 
Post Only Order could either be a displayed order or a non-displayed 
order for it to engage in a liquidity swap with an order with a Super 
Aggressive instruction resting on the BYX Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ But see supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with the Super Aggressive instruction to access 
liquidity displayed on other Trading Centers, the Exchange proposes to 
amend the Super Aggressive instruction such that an order with such 
instruction would execute against an equally priced incoming Post Only 
Order only when such order would be displayed on the BYX Book. The 
order with a Super Aggressive instruction would act as a liquidity 
remover in such a scenario. Should an equally priced incoming Post Only 
Order not be designated as a displayed order, the resting order with a 
Super Aggressive instruction would remain on the BYX Book and await an 
execution where it may act as a liquidity provider. An incoming Post 
Only Order that would also be designated as a non-displayed order would 
be posted to the BYX Book at its limit price, creating an internally 
locked non-displayed book. As is the case today, an execution would 
continue to occur where an incoming Post Only Order is priced more 
aggressively than the order with a Super Aggressive instruction resting 
on the BYX Book, regardless of whether the incoming Post Only Order was 
designated as a displayed order or a non-displayed order.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that Users seeking to act as a liquidity remover 
once resting on the BYX Book in all cases (i.e., seeking to execute 
against incoming Post Only orders regardless of the display 
instruction) would be able to attach the Non-Displayed Swap (``NDS'') 
instruction to their order.\11\ The NDS instruction is similar to the 
Super Aggressive instruction, in that it also would be an optional 
order instruction that a User may include on an order that directs the 
Exchange to have such order, when resting on the BYX Book, execute 
against an incoming Post Only Order rather than have it be locked by 
the incoming order. Under BYX Rules, because orders with either 
instruction (i.e., Super Aggressive and NDS) would execute against 
incoming Post Only Orders regardless of whether the order is to be 
displayed, the instructions are currently identical with two 
exceptions. First, an order with a Super Aggressive instruction would 
not convert into a liquidity removing order and execute against a Post 
Only Order if there is an order on the order book with priority over 
such order that does not also contain a Super Aggressive instruction. 
As further described below, the Exchange is proposing to modify this 
feature of the Super Aggressive instruction. The second current 
distinction between the two instructions, which would remain, is that 
an order with a Super Aggressive instruction can be displayed on the 
Exchange whereas an order with the NDS instruction must be non-
displayed. As amended, the additional distinction between the two 
instructions would be whether an order would become a liquidity 
removing order against any Post Only Order that would lock it (i.e., 
NDS) or only when the Post Only Order that would lock it also is a 
displayed order (i.e., Super Aggressive).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The below examples illustrate the proposed behavior should the 
Exchange propose to change its fee schedule such that ``Post Only'' 
functionality is more relevant to the operation of the Exchange.\12\ 
Assume the National Best Bid and Offer (``NBBO'') is $10.00 by $10.10. 
An order to buy is displayed on the BYX Book at $10.00 with a Super 
Aggressive instruction. There are no other orders resting on the BYX 
Book. An order to sell at $10.00 with a Post Only that is designated as 
a displayed order is entered. The incoming order to sell would execute 
against the resting order to buy at $10.00, the locking price, because 
the incoming order was designated as a displayed order. The order to 
buy would act as the liquidity remover and the order to sell would act 
as the liquidity adder. However, no execution would occur if the 
incoming order to sell was designated as a non-displayed order. 
Instead, the incoming order to sell would be posted non-displayed to 
the BYX Book at $10.00, its limit price, causing the BYX Book to be 
internally locked.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Exchange proposes to enable a Post Only Order that is 
designated as a displayed order to execute against an equally priced 
non-displayed order with a Super Aggressive instruction where a non-
displayed order without a Super Aggressive instruction maintains time 
priority over the Super Aggressive eligible order at that price. In 
such case, the non-displayed, non-Super Aggressive order would seek to 
remain a liquidity provider and would cede time priority to the order 
with a Super Aggressive instruction, which is willing to act as a 
liquidity remover to facilitate the execution. The Exchange proposes to 
effect this change by modifying language in the description of the 
Super Aggressive instruction to state that if an order displayed on the 
BYX Book does not contain a Super Aggressive instruction and maintains 
higher priority than one or more Super Aggressive eligible orders, the 
Super Aggressive eligible order(s) with lower priority will not be 
converted and the incoming Post Only Order will be posted or cancelled 
in accordance with Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(6) or Rule 11.9(c)(7). Thus, 
an order with a Super Aggressive instruction, whether displayed on the 
Exchange or non-displayed, would never execute ahead of a displayed 
order that maintains time priority.
    Should the Exchange determine to change its fee schedule, the 
operation of the Super Aggressive instruction with respect to incoming 
contra-side orders received by the Exchange, would be designed to 
facilitate executions that would otherwise not occur due to the Post 
Only Order requirement to not remove liquidity. Users entering orders 
with the Super Aggressive instruction tend to be fee agnostic because 
an order with a Super Aggressive instruction is willing to route to an 
away Trading Center displaying an equally or better priced order (i.e., 
pay a fee at such Trading Center). Meanwhile, an order without the 
Super Aggressive instruction elects to remain on the BYX Book as the 
liquidity provider until it may execute against an incoming order that 
would act as the liquidity remover.

[[Page 38189]]

Therefore, if the fee schedule is changed in the future, the proposed 
change to enable the Super Aggressive order to execute against an 
incoming order, regardless of whether a non-displayed order without a 
Super Aggressive instruction maintains priority, would be consistent 
with the User's intent for both orders--one choses to remain the 
liquidity provider and forgo the execution while the other is willing 
to execute irrespective of whether it is the liquidity provider or 
remover. The Exchange notes that similar behavior occurs for orders 
utilizing the NDS instruction,\13\ which also would seek to engage in a 
liquidity swap against incoming Post Only Orders. The Exchange, 
however, has proposed to retain the existing limitation with respect to 
orders displayed on the BYX Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(12). See also Securities Exchange 
Act Release No. 83536 (June 28, 2018), (SR-CboeBYX-2018-009) 
(including an example where an order cedes execution priority to an 
order with an NDS instruction).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following example illustrates the operation of an order with a 
Super Aggressive instruction under the proposed rule change should the 
Exchange propose to change its fee schedule such that ``Post Only'' 
functionality is more relevant to the operation of the Exchange.\14\ 
Assume the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.04. There is a non-displayed Limit 
Order to buy resting on the BYX Book at $10.03 (``Order A''). A second 
non-displayed Limit Order to buy at $10.03 is then entered with a Super 
Aggressive instruction and has time priority behind the first Limit 
Order (``Order B''). A Post Only Order to sell priced at $10.03 is 
entered. Under current behavior, the incoming sell Post Only Order 
would not execute against Order A and would post to the BYX Book \15\ 
because the value of such execution against the resting buy order when 
removing liquidity does not equal or exceed the value of such execution 
if the order instead posted to the BYX Book and subsequently provided 
liquidity, including the applicable fees charged or rebates provided. 
Further, the incoming sell Post Only Order could not execute against 
Order B because Order A is on the BYX Book and maintains time priority 
over Order B. Under the proposed change, the incoming sell order, if it 
was designated as a displayed order, would execute against Order B and 
Order B would become the remover of liquidity while the incoming sell 
Post Only Order would become the liquidity provider. In such case, 
Order A cedes priority to Order B because Order A did not also include 
a Super Aggressive instruction \16\ and thus the User that submitted 
the order did not indicate the preference to be treated as the remover 
of liquidity in favor of an execution; instead, by not using Super 
Aggressive, a User indicates the preference to remain posted on the BYX 
Book as a liquidity provider. However, if the incoming sell order was 
priced at $10.02, it would receive sufficient price improvement to 
execute upon entry against all resting buy Limit Orders in time 
priority at $10.03.\17\ Also, if Order A was displayed on the BYX Book, 
no execution would occur, as the proposed change would only apply to 
non-displayed liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See supra note 8.
    \15\ Such order would be posted to the BYX Book in accordance 
with the Exchange's re-pricing instructions to comply with Rule 
610(d) of Regulation NMS. See Exchange Rules 11.9(g)(1) and (g)(2). 
See also 242 CFR 242.610(d).
    \16\ This behavior is consistent with the operation of the 
Exchange's NDS instruction. See supra note 13.
    \17\ The execution occurs here because the value of the 
execution against the buy order when removing liquidity exceeds the 
value of such execution if the order instead posted to the BYX Book 
and subsequently provided liquidity, including the applicable fees 
charged or rebates provided. See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act \18\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act \19\ in particular, in that it is designed to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in 
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed changes to the Super Aggressive order instruction are 
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Super 
Aggressive instruction is an optional feature that is intended to 
reflect the order management practices of various market participants. 
The proposal to limit the execution of an order with a Super Aggressive 
instruction to execute against incoming Post Only Orders that also are 
designated as displayed orders promotes just and equitable principles 
of trade because it would enable Users to elect an order instruction 
consistent with their intent to execute only against displayed orders, 
in part, for best execution purposes. The amended Super Aggressive 
instruction would ensure executions at the best available price 
displayed on another Trading Center or against an incoming order that 
would have been displayed on the BYX Book. Users seeking to act as a 
liquidity remover once resting on the BYX Book and execute against an 
incoming Post Only Order that is also designated as a non-displayed 
order may attach the NDS instruction to their order.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Should the Exchange determine to change its fee schedule such that 
``Post Only'' functionality is more relevant to the operation of the 
Exchange, the proposed change to the Super Aggressive instruction would 
also remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system because it would be designed to 
facilitate executions that would otherwise not occur due to the Post 
Only Order requirement to not remove liquidity under such amended fee 
schedule.\21\ The proposal enables non-displayed Super Aggressive 
orders to execute against an incoming order, regardless of whether 
another non-displayed order without a Super Aggressive instruction 
maintains priority consistent with the User's intent for both orders--
one chooses to remain the liquidity provider and forgo the execution 
while the other is willing to execute irrespective of whether it is the 
liquidity provider or remover. The non-Super Aggressive order would 
seek to remain a liquidity provider and would cede its time priority to 
the order with a Super Aggressive instruction, which would be willing 
to act as a liquidity remover to facilitate the execution. It also 
would enable an order without the Super Aggressive instruction to 
remain on the BYX Book as a liquidity provider, consistent with the 
expected operation of their resting order. The Exchange notes that 
similar behavior occurs for orders utilizing the NDS \22\ instruction, 
which also seeks to engage in a liquidity swap against incoming Post 
Only Orders. Finally, by limiting the proposed change to non-displayed 
orders, the proposal would remain consistent with NDS and also would 
retain existing functionality with respect to the handling of displayed 
orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See supra note 8.
    \22\ See supra note 13.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 38190]]

    For the reasons set forth above, the Exchange believes the proposal 
removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system, and, in general, protects 
investors and the public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange notes that there will be no burden on competition 
based on the Exchange's current fee schedule, because as described 
above, Post Only Orders remove against resting contra-side interest on 
entry, and thus, the revised functionality is inapplicable.\23\ 
Further, in the event the Exchange modifies its fee schedule, the 
Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in 
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. On the contrary, 
the proposed changes to the Super Aggressive order instruction are 
intended to improve the usefulness of the instruction and to align its 
operation with the intention of the User, resulting in enhanced 
competition through increased usage and execution quality on the 
Exchange. Thus, to the extent the change is intended to improve 
functionality on the Exchange to encourage Users to direct their orders 
to the Exchange, the change is competitive, but the Exchange does not 
believe the proposed change will result in any burden on intermarket 
competition as it is a minor change to available functionality. The 
proposed changes to the Super Aggressive order instruction also promote 
intramarket competition because they will facilitate the execution of 
orders that would otherwise remain unexecuted consistent with the 
intent of the User entering the order, thereby increasing the efficient 
functioning of the Exchange. Further, the Super Aggressive order 
instruction will remain available to all Users in the same way it is 
today. Thus, Users can continue to choose between various optional 
order instructions, including Super Aggressive, NDS, and others, 
depending on the order handling they prefer the Exchange to utilize. 
Therefore, the Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary 
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \24\ and 
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does 
not become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing. However, 
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \26\ permits the Commission to designate a 
shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest. In its filing, BYX requested that 
the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the Exchange 
can implement the proposed rule change promptly after filing. The 
proposed changes to the Super Aggressive instruction would not impact 
trading under the current pricing schedule, but the Exchange noted that 
it intends to update its systems to implement the proposed changes on a 
similar schedule to its affiliates.\27\ BYX indicated its desire to 
maintain rules and functionality similar to its affiliated exchanges 
and noted that the proposed rule changes would be relevant if the 
Exchange decides to alter its pricing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \27\ See note 4 supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Should BYX determine to change its fee schedule such that the Post 
Only functionality is more relevant to the operation of the Exchange, 
BYX stated that the proposal to allow an order with a Super Aggressive 
instruction to execute against an incoming Post Only order only if the 
Post Only order is displayable would be consistent with the use of the 
Super Aggressive instruction to access liquidity displayed on other 
Trading Centers. Further, according to the Exchange, users seeking to 
execute against incoming non-displayable Post Only orders would 
continue to be able to attach the NDS order instruction, as well as 
other order instructions that may permit such executions. In addition, 
the Exchange stated that the proposed priority change where non-
displayed orders without a Super Aggressive instruction would cede 
priority to non-displayed orders with a Super Aggressive instruction is 
similar to, and consistent with, the Exchange's priority ceding 
functionality for orders with an NDS instruction and would facilitate 
executions that would otherwise not occur due to an incoming Post Only 
order's requirement not to remove liquidity.
    The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay 
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, 
as such waiver will permit the Exchange to promptly update its rules 
and systems to maintain consistency with its affiliate exchanges. The 
Commission also notes that the proposed rule change relates to optional 
functionality that is consistent with existing functionality and, if 
selected by Exchange users, may enable them to better manage their 
orders and may increase order interaction on the Exchange in the event 
the Exchange changes its fee schedule such that the Post Only 
functionality is more relevant to the operation of the Exchange. 
Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay 
and designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) 
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the 
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act.

[[Page 38191]]

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-CboeBYX-2018-012 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBYX-2018-012. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBYX-2018-012, and should be 
submitted on or before August 24, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) and (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16596 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices                                                      38187

                                              of the functions of the agency, including               comments on the proposed rule change                  schedule, because BYX offers rebates to
                                              whether the information will have                       from interested persons.                              remove liquidity and charges fees to add
                                              practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the                                                                    liquidity, BYX Post Only Orders and
                                                                                                      I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                              agency’s estimate of the burden imposed                                                                       Partial Post Only at Limit Orders
                                                                                                      Statement of the Terms of Substance of
                                              by the collection of information; (c)                                                                         remove liquidity on entry against resting
                                                                                                      the Proposed Rule Change
                                              ways to enhance the quality, utility, and                                                                     interest and are not booked/displayed if
                                              clarity of the information collected; and                  The Exchange filed a proposal to                   there is contra-side interest. As such,
                                              (d) ways to minimize the burden of the                  amend paragraph (b)(4)(C) of Exchange                 the descriptions below of the changes to
                                              collection of information on                            Rule 11.13 related to Super Aggressive                Rule 11.13(b)(4)(C), including the
                                              respondents, including through the use                  order instructions.                                   examples of the revised operation of the
                                              of automated collection techniques or                      The text of the proposed rule change               Super Aggressive functionality are
                                              other forms of information technology.                  is available at the Exchange’s website at             currently inapplicable because BYX
                                                                                                      www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal                Post Only Orders and Partial Post Only
                                                Consideration will be given to
                                                                                                      office of the Exchange, and at the                    at Limit Orders execute against resting
                                              comments and suggestions submitted in
                                                                                                      Commission’s Public Reference Room.                   liquidity first, before the logic discussed
                                              writing within 60 days of this
                                              publication. Please direct your written                 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                    below is triggered. However, consistent
                                              comments to Pamela Dyson, Director/                     Statement of the Purpose of, and                      with its prior practice, the Exchange is
                                              Chief Information Officer, Securities                   Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                proposing the changes to Rule
                                              and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace                    Change                                                11.13(b)(4)(C) related to the Super
                                              Kenner, 100 F St. NE, Washington DC                                                                           Aggressive instruction in this filing in
                                                                                                         In its filing with the Commission, the             order to retain consistent rules and
                                              20549; or send an email to: PRA_                        Exchange included statements
                                              Mailbox@sec.gov.                                                                                              functionality with its affiliated
                                                                                                      concerning the purpose of and basis for               exchanges 5 to the extent the Exchange
                                                Dated: July 30, 2018.                                 the proposed rule change and discussed                decides to propose changes to its fee
                                              Robert W. Errett,                                       any comments it received on the                       structure in the future such that ‘‘Post
                                              Deputy Secretary.                                       proposed rule change. The text of these               Only’’ functionality is more relevant to
                                              [FR Doc. 2018–16601 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                      statements may be examined at the                     the operation of the Exchange.
                                                                                                      places specified in Item IV below. The                   Super Aggressive is an optional order
                                              BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
                                                                                                      Exchange has prepared summaries, set                  instruction that directs the System 6 to
                                                                                                      forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of               route an order when an away Trading
                                              SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                 the most significant parts of such                    Center locks or crosses the limit price of
                                              COMMISSION                                              statements.                                           the order resting on the BYX Book.7 If
                                                                                                      A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                     an order with a Super Aggressive
                                              [Release No. 34–83738; File No. SR–                     Statement of the Purpose of, and                      instruction were to be locked by an
                                              CboeBYX–2018–012]                                       Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                incoming BYX Post Only Order or
                                                                                                      Change                                                Partial Post Only at Limit Order
                                              Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe                                                                           (hereafter collectively referred to as a
                                              BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing                    1. Purpose                                            ‘‘Post Only Order’’) that does not
                                              and Immediate Effectiveness of a                           The Exchange proposes to amend the                 remove liquidity pursuant to Rule
                                              Proposed Rule Change to Exchange                        description of the Super Aggressive Re-               11.9(c)(6) or 11.9(c)(7), respectively,8
                                              Rule 11.13, Order Execution and                         Route instruction (‘‘Super Aggressive
                                              Routing, To Amend the Operation of                      instruction’’) under paragraph (b)(4)(C)                 5 The Exchange notes that its affiliates, Cboe BZX

                                              the Super Aggressive Order                              of Exchange Rule 11.13, Order                         Exchange, Inc. and Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc., also
                                                                                                                                                            recently filed to adopt the functionality described
                                              Instruction                                             Execution and Routing to: (i) Specify                 in this filing and such functionality is applicable on
                                                                                                      that an incoming BYX Post Only Order                  such exchanges because orders equivalent to BYX
                                              July 30, 2018.                                          or Partial Post Only at Limit Order that              Post Only Orders and/or Partial Post Only at Limit
                                                 Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                  would lock a resting order with a Super               Orders can be entered on such exchanges and do
                                              Securities Exchange Act of 1934                         Aggressive instruction must be                        not always remove against contra-side interest on
                                                                                                                                                            entry pursuant to such exchanges’ fee schedules.
                                              (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2                 designated as eligible for display on the             See SR–CboeBZX–2018–051 and SR–CboeEDGX–
                                              notice is hereby given that on July 16,                 Exchange (a ‘‘displayed order’’) for the              2018–025, each filed July 11, 2018.
                                              2018, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (the                      order with a Super Aggressive                            6 The term ‘‘System’’ is defined as ‘‘the electronic

                                              ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed with the                 instruction to engage in a liquidity swap             communications and trading facility designated by
                                                                                                                                                            the Board through which securities orders of Users
                                              Securities and Exchange Commission                      and execute against that incoming order;              are consolidated for ranking, execution and, when
                                              (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                      and (ii) modify language from the                     applicable, routing away.’’ See Exchange Rule
                                              change as described in Items I and II                   description of the Super Aggressive                   1.5(aa).
                                              below, which Items have been prepared                   instruction that states if an order that                 7 See Exchange Rule 1.5(e).
                                                                                                                                                               8 A BYX Post Only Order will remove contra-side
                                              by the Exchange. The Exchange has                       does not contain a Super Aggressive
                                                                                                      instruction maintains higher priority                 liquidity from the BYX Book if the order is an order
                                              designated this proposal as a ‘‘non-                                                                          to buy or sell a security priced below $1.00 or if
                                              controversial’’ proposed rule change                    than one or more Super Aggressive                     the value of such execution when removing
                                              pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the                  eligible orders, the Super Aggressive                 liquidity equals or exceeds the value of such
                                              Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4                 eligible order(s) with lower priority                 execution if the order instead posted to the BYX
                                                                                                      would not be converted and an                         Book and subsequently provided liquidity,
                                              which renders it effective upon filing
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                                                                                                                                            including the applicable fees charged or rebates
                                              with the Commission. The Commission                     incoming BYX Post Only Order or                       provided. See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(6). A Partial
                                              is publishing this notice to solicit                    Partial Post Only at Limit Order would                Post Only at Limit Order will remove liquidity from
                                                                                                      be posted or cancelled in accordance                  the BYX Book up to the full size of the order if, at
                                                1 15                                                  with Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(6) or                      the time of receipt, it can be executed at prices
                                                     U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                                                                                      better than its limit price. See Exchange Rule
                                                2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                   11.9(c)(7).                                           11.9(c)(7). As noted above, due to the current BYX
                                                3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).                                At the outset, the Exchange notes that             pricing schedule, which offers rebates to remove
                                                4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).                             based on the Exchange’s current pricing                                                            Continued




                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:26 Aug 02, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00072   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM   03AUN1


                                              38188                           Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices

                                              the order with a Super Aggressive                        designated as a displayed order or a                 order to buy at $10.00, the locking price,
                                              instruction would be converted to an                     non-displayed order.10                               because the incoming order was
                                              executable order and would remove                           The Exchange notes that Users                     designated as a displayed order. The
                                              liquidity against such incoming order.                   seeking to act as a liquidity remover                order to buy would act as the liquidity
                                                 First, the Exchange proposes to                       once resting on the BYX Book in all                  remover and the order to sell would act
                                              modify the Super Aggressive instruction                  cases (i.e., seeking to execute against              as the liquidity adder. However, no
                                              to require that the incoming Post Only                   incoming Post Only orders regardless of              execution would occur if the incoming
                                              Order that would lock a resting order                    the display instruction) would be able to            order to sell was designated as a non-
                                              with a Super Aggressive instruction                      attach the Non-Displayed Swap (‘‘NDS’’)              displayed order. Instead, the incoming
                                              must be designated as a displayed order                  instruction to their order.11 The NDS                order to sell would be posted non-
                                              for an execution to occur. The Super                     instruction is similar to the Super                  displayed to the BYX Book at $10.00, its
                                              Aggressive instruction is generally                      Aggressive instruction, in that it also              limit price, causing the BYX Book to be
                                              utilized for best execution purposes                     would be an optional order instruction               internally locked.
                                              because it enables the order to                          that a User may include on an order that                Second, the Exchange proposes to
                                              immediately attempt to access displayed                  directs the Exchange to have such order,             enable a Post Only Order that is
                                              liquidity on another Trading Center that                 when resting on the BYX Book, execute                designated as a displayed order to
                                              is either priced equal to or better than                 against an incoming Post Only Order                  execute against an equally priced non-
                                              the order with a Super Aggressive                        rather than have it be locked by the                 displayed order with a Super Aggressive
                                              instruction’s limit price. The Super                     incoming order. Under BYX Rules,                     instruction where a non-displayed order
                                              Aggressive instruction would also                        because orders with either instruction               without a Super Aggressive instruction
                                              enable the order to execute against an                   (i.e., Super Aggressive and NDS) would               maintains time priority over the Super
                                              equally priced incoming Post Only                        execute against incoming Post Only                   Aggressive eligible order at that price. In
                                              Order that would otherwise not execute                   Orders regardless of whether the order               such case, the non-displayed, non-Super
                                              by being willing to act as the liquidity                 is to be displayed, the instructions are             Aggressive order would seek to remain
                                              remover in such a scenario.9 Under BYX                   currently identical with two exceptions.             a liquidity provider and would cede
                                              Rules, the incoming Post Only Order                      First, an order with a Super Aggressive              time priority to the order with a Super
                                              could either be a displayed order or a                   instruction would not convert into a                 Aggressive instruction, which is willing
                                              non-displayed order for it to engage in                  liquidity removing order and execute                 to act as a liquidity remover to facilitate
                                                                                                       against a Post Only Order if there is an             the execution. The Exchange proposes
                                              a liquidity swap with an order with a
                                                                                                       order on the order book with priority                to effect this change by modifying
                                              Super Aggressive instruction resting on
                                                                                                       over such order that does not also                   language in the description of the Super
                                              the BYX Book.
                                                                                                       contain a Super Aggressive instruction.              Aggressive instruction to state that if an
                                                 Consistent with the Super Aggressive                  As further described below, the                      order displayed on the BYX Book does
                                              instruction to access liquidity displayed                Exchange is proposing to modify this                 not contain a Super Aggressive
                                              on other Trading Centers, the Exchange                   feature of the Super Aggressive                      instruction and maintains higher
                                              proposes to amend the Super Aggressive                   instruction. The second current                      priority than one or more Super
                                              instruction such that an order with such                 distinction between the two                          Aggressive eligible orders, the Super
                                              instruction would execute against an                     instructions, which would remain, is                 Aggressive eligible order(s) with lower
                                              equally priced incoming Post Only                        that an order with a Super Aggressive                priority will not be converted and the
                                              Order only when such order would be                      instruction can be displayed on the                  incoming Post Only Order will be
                                              displayed on the BYX Book. The order                     Exchange whereas an order with the                   posted or cancelled in accordance with
                                              with a Super Aggressive instruction                      NDS instruction must be non-displayed.               Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(6) or Rule
                                              would act as a liquidity remover in such                 As amended, the additional distinction               11.9(c)(7). Thus, an order with a Super
                                              a scenario. Should an equally priced                     between the two instructions would be                Aggressive instruction, whether
                                              incoming Post Only Order not be                          whether an order would become a                      displayed on the Exchange or non-
                                              designated as a displayed order, the                     liquidity removing order against any                 displayed, would never execute ahead
                                              resting order with a Super Aggressive                    Post Only Order that would lock it (i.e.,            of a displayed order that maintains time
                                              instruction would remain on the BYX                      NDS) or only when the Post Only Order                priority.
                                              Book and await an execution where it                     that would lock it also is a displayed                  Should the Exchange determine to
                                              may act as a liquidity provider. An                      order (i.e., Super Aggressive).                      change its fee schedule, the operation of
                                              incoming Post Only Order that would                         The below examples illustrate the                 the Super Aggressive instruction with
                                              also be designated as a non-displayed                    proposed behavior should the Exchange                respect to incoming contra-side orders
                                              order would be posted to the BYX Book                    propose to change its fee schedule such              received by the Exchange, would be
                                              at its limit price, creating an internally               that ‘‘Post Only’’ functionality is more             designed to facilitate executions that
                                              locked non-displayed book. As is the                     relevant to the operation of the                     would otherwise not occur due to the
                                              case today, an execution would                           Exchange.12 Assume the National Best                 Post Only Order requirement to not
                                              continue to occur where an incoming                      Bid and Offer (‘‘NBBO’’) is $10.00 by                remove liquidity. Users entering orders
                                              Post Only Order is priced more                           $10.10. An order to buy is displayed on              with the Super Aggressive instruction
                                              aggressively than the order with a Super                 the BYX Book at $10.00 with a Super                  tend to be fee agnostic because an order
                                              Aggressive instruction resting on the                    Aggressive instruction. There are no                 with a Super Aggressive instruction is
                                              BYX Book, regardless of whether the                      other orders resting on the BYX Book.                willing to route to an away Trading
                                              incoming Post Only Order was                             An order to sell at $10.00 with a Post               Center displaying an equally or better
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                                                                                       Only that is designated as a displayed               priced order (i.e., pay a fee at such
                                              liquidity, Post Only Orders are not booked/              order is entered. The incoming order to              Trading Center). Meanwhile, an order
                                              displayed if there is contra-side interest and instead
                                                                                                       sell would execute against the resting               without the Super Aggressive
                                              remove liquidity against resting interest.                                                                    instruction elects to remain on the BYX
                                              Accordingly, an order with a Super Aggressive
                                              instruction will not be converted under the current       10 See id.                                          Book as the liquidity provider until it
                                              fee schedule.                                             11 See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(12).                   may execute against an incoming order
                                                 9 But see supra note 8.                                12 See supra note 8.                                that would act as the liquidity remover.


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:26 Aug 02, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00073   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM   03AUN1


                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices                                               38189

                                              Therefore, if the fee schedule is changed               of liquidity while the incoming sell Post              of trade because it would enable Users
                                              in the future, the proposed change to                   Only Order would become the liquidity                  to elect an order instruction consistent
                                              enable the Super Aggressive order to                    provider. In such case, Order A cedes                  with their intent to execute only against
                                              execute against an incoming order,                      priority to Order B because Order A did                displayed orders, in part, for best
                                              regardless of whether a non-displayed                   not also include a Super Aggressive                    execution purposes. The amended
                                              order without a Super Aggressive                        instruction 16 and thus the User that                  Super Aggressive instruction would
                                              instruction maintains priority, would be                submitted the order did not indicate the               ensure executions at the best available
                                              consistent with the User’s intent for                   preference to be treated as the remover                price displayed on another Trading
                                              both orders—one choses to remain the                    of liquidity in favor of an execution;                 Center or against an incoming order that
                                              liquidity provider and forgo the                        instead, by not using Super Aggressive,                would have been displayed on the BYX
                                              execution while the other is willing to                 a User indicates the preference to                     Book. Users seeking to act as a liquidity
                                              execute irrespective of whether it is the               remain posted on the BYX Book as a                     remover once resting on the BYX Book
                                              liquidity provider or remover. The                      liquidity provider. However, if the                    and execute against an incoming Post
                                              Exchange notes that similar behavior                    incoming sell order was priced at                      Only Order that is also designated as a
                                              occurs for orders utilizing the NDS                     $10.02, it would receive sufficient price              non-displayed order may attach the
                                              instruction,13 which also would seek to                 improvement to execute upon entry                      NDS instruction to their order.20
                                              engage in a liquidity swap against                      against all resting buy Limit Orders in
                                                                                                                                                                Should the Exchange determine to
                                              incoming Post Only Orders. The                          time priority at $10.03.17 Also, if Order
                                                                                                                                                             change its fee schedule such that ‘‘Post
                                              Exchange, however, has proposed to                      A was displayed on the BYX Book, no
                                                                                                                                                             Only’’ functionality is more relevant to
                                              retain the existing limitation with                     execution would occur, as the proposed
                                                                                                                                                             the operation of the Exchange, the
                                              respect to orders displayed on the BYX                  change would only apply to non-
                                                                                                                                                             proposed change to the Super
                                              Book.                                                   displayed liquidity.
                                                 The following example illustrates the                                                                       Aggressive instruction would also
                                              operation of an order with a Super                      2. Statutory Basis                                     remove impediments to and perfect the
                                              Aggressive instruction under the                           The Exchange believes that its                      mechanism of a free and open market
                                              proposed rule change should the                         proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)               and a national market system because it
                                              Exchange propose to change its fee                      of the Act 18 in general, and furthers the             would be designed to facilitate
                                              schedule such that ‘‘Post Only’’                        objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 19            executions that would otherwise not
                                              functionality is more relevant to the                   in particular, in that it is designed to               occur due to the Post Only Order
                                              operation of the Exchange.14 Assume                     promote just and equitable principles of               requirement to not remove liquidity
                                              the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.04. There is                  trade, to foster cooperation and                       under such amended fee schedule.21
                                              a non-displayed Limit Order to buy                      coordination with persons engaged in                   The proposal enables non-displayed
                                              resting on the BYX Book at $10.03                       facilitating transactions in securities, to            Super Aggressive orders to execute
                                              (‘‘Order A’’). A second non-displayed                   remove impediments to and perfect the                  against an incoming order, regardless of
                                              Limit Order to buy at $10.03 is then                    mechanism of a free and open market                    whether another non-displayed order
                                              entered with a Super Aggressive                         and a national market system and, in                   without a Super Aggressive instruction
                                              instruction and has time priority behind                general, to protect investors and the                  maintains priority consistent with the
                                              the first Limit Order (‘‘Order B’’). A Post             public interest.                                       User’s intent for both orders—one
                                              Only Order to sell priced at $10.03 is                     The proposed changes to the Super                   chooses to remain the liquidity provider
                                              entered. Under current behavior, the                    Aggressive order instruction are                       and forgo the execution while the other
                                              incoming sell Post Only Order would                     designed to promote just and equitable                 is willing to execute irrespective of
                                              not execute against Order A and would                   principles of trade, to foster cooperation             whether it is the liquidity provider or
                                              post to the BYX Book 15 because the                     and coordination with persons engaged                  remover. The non-Super Aggressive
                                              value of such execution against the                     in facilitating transactions in securities,            order would seek to remain a liquidity
                                              resting buy order when removing                         to remove impediments to and perfect                   provider and would cede its time
                                              liquidity does not equal or exceed the                  the mechanism of a free and open                       priority to the order with a Super
                                              value of such execution if the order                    market and a national market system                    Aggressive instruction, which would be
                                              instead posted to the BYX Book and                      and, in general, to protect investors and              willing to act as a liquidity remover to
                                              subsequently provided liquidity,                        the public interest. The Super                         facilitate the execution. It also would
                                              including the applicable fees charged or                Aggressive instruction is an optional                  enable an order without the Super
                                              rebates provided. Further, the incoming                 feature that is intended to reflect the                Aggressive instruction to remain on the
                                              sell Post Only Order could not execute                  order management practices of various                  BYX Book as a liquidity provider,
                                              against Order B because Order A is on                   market participants. The proposal to                   consistent with the expected operation
                                              the BYX Book and maintains time                         limit the execution of an order with a                 of their resting order. The Exchange
                                              priority over Order B. Under the                        Super Aggressive instruction to execute                notes that similar behavior occurs for
                                              proposed change, the incoming sell                      against incoming Post Only Orders that                 orders utilizing the NDS 22 instruction,
                                              order, if it was designated as a displayed              also are designated as displayed orders                which also seeks to engage in a liquidity
                                              order, would execute against Order B                    promotes just and equitable principles                 swap against incoming Post Only
                                              and Order B would become the remover                                                                           Orders. Finally, by limiting the
                                                                                                         16 This behavior is consistent with the operation
                                                                                                                                                             proposed change to non-displayed
                                                                                                      of the Exchange’s NDS instruction. See supra note
                                                13 See  Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(12). See also
                                                                                                      13.
                                                                                                                                                             orders, the proposal would remain
                                              Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83536 (June                                                                consistent with NDS and also would
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                                                                                         17 The execution occurs here because the value of
                                              28, 2018), (SR–CboeBYX–2018–009) (including an
                                              example where an order cedes execution priority to      the execution against the buy order when removing      retain existing functionality with
                                              an order with an NDS instruction).                      liquidity exceeds the value of such execution if the   respect to the handling of displayed
                                                 14 See supra note 8.                                 order instead posted to the BYX Book and               orders.
                                                 15 Such order would be posted to the BYX Book        subsequently provided liquidity, including the
                                              in accordance with the Exchange’s re-pricing            applicable fees charged or rebates provided. See
                                              instructions to comply with Rule 610(d) of              supra note 8.                                           20 See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(12).
                                                                                                         18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).                                 21 See supra note 8.
                                              Regulation NMS. See Exchange Rules 11.9(g)(1) and
                                              (g)(2). See also 242 CFR 242.610(d).                       19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).                              22 See supra note 13.




                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:26 Aug 02, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00074   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM     03AUN1


                                              38190                            Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices

                                                For the reasons set forth above, the                    C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                         instruction to access liquidity displayed
                                              Exchange believes the proposal removes                    Statement on Comments on the                              on other Trading Centers. Further,
                                              impediments to and perfects the                           Proposed Rule Change Received From                        according to the Exchange, users
                                              mechanism of a free and open market                       Members, Participants, or Others                          seeking to execute against incoming
                                              and a national market system, and, in                       The Exchange has neither solicited                      non-displayable Post Only orders would
                                              general, protects investors and the                       nor received written comments on the                      continue to be able to attach the NDS
                                              public interest.                                          proposed rule change.                                     order instruction, as well as other order
                                                                                                                                                                  instructions that may permit such
                                              B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                         III. Date of Effectiveness of the                         executions. In addition, the Exchange
                                              Statement on Burden on Competition                        Proposed Rule Change and Timing for                       stated that the proposed priority change
                                                                                                        Commission Action                                         where non-displayed orders without a
                                                 The Exchange notes that there will be                                                                            Super Aggressive instruction would
                                                                                                           Because the foregoing proposed rule
                                              no burden on competition based on the                                                                               cede priority to non-displayed orders
                                                                                                        change does not: (i) Significantly affect
                                              Exchange’s current fee schedule,                                                                                    with a Super Aggressive instruction is
                                                                                                        the protection of investors or the public
                                              because as described above, Post Only                     interest; (ii) impose any significant                     similar to, and consistent with, the
                                              Orders remove against resting contra-                     burden on competition; and (iii) become                   Exchange’s priority ceding functionality
                                              side interest on entry, and thus, the                     operative for 30 days from the date on                    for orders with an NDS instruction and
                                              revised functionality is inapplicable.23                  which it was filed, or such shorter time                  would facilitate executions that would
                                              Further, in the event the Exchange                        as the Commission may designate, it has                   otherwise not occur due to an incoming
                                              modifies its fee schedule, the Exchange                   become effective pursuant to Section                      Post Only order’s requirement not to
                                              does not believe that the proposed rule                   19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 24 and                        remove liquidity.
                                              change will result in any burden on                       subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4                            The Commission believes that waiver
                                              competition that is not necessary or                      thereunder.25                                             of the 30-day operative delay is
                                              appropriate in furtherance of the                            A proposed rule change filed under                     consistent with the protection of
                                              purposes of the Act, as amended. On the                   Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally does not                        investors and the public interest, as
                                              contrary, the proposed changes to the                     become operative for 30 days after the                    such waiver will permit the Exchange to
                                              Super Aggressive order instruction are                    date of the filing. However, Rule 19b–                    promptly update its rules and systems
                                              intended to improve the usefulness of                     4(f)(6)(iii) 26 permits the Commission to                 to maintain consistency with its affiliate
                                              the instruction and to align its operation                designate a shorter time if such action                   exchanges. The Commission also notes
                                              with the intention of the User, resulting                 is consistent with the protection of                      that the proposed rule change relates to
                                              in enhanced competition through                           investors and the public interest. In its                 optional functionality that is consistent
                                              increased usage and execution quality                     filing, BYX requested that the                            with existing functionality and, if
                                              on the Exchange. Thus, to the extent the                  Commission waive the 30-day operative                     selected by Exchange users, may enable
                                                                                                        delay so that the Exchange can                            them to better manage their orders and
                                              change is intended to improve
                                                                                                        implement the proposed rule change                        may increase order interaction on the
                                              functionality on the Exchange to
                                                                                                        promptly after filing. The proposed                       Exchange in the event the Exchange
                                              encourage Users to direct their orders to                                                                           changes its fee schedule such that the
                                                                                                        changes to the Super Aggressive
                                              the Exchange, the change is competitive,                  instruction would not impact trading                      Post Only functionality is more relevant
                                              but the Exchange does not believe the                     under the current pricing schedule, but                   to the operation of the Exchange.
                                              proposed change will result in any                        the Exchange noted that it intends to                     Accordingly, the Commission hereby
                                              burden on intermarket competition as it                   update its systems to implement the                       waives the 30-day operative delay and
                                              is a minor change to available                            proposed changes on a similar schedule                    designates the proposed rule change
                                              functionality. The proposed changes to                    to its affiliates.27 BYX indicated its                    operative upon filing.28
                                              the Super Aggressive order instruction                    desire to maintain rules and                                 At any time within 60 days of the
                                              also promote intramarket competition                      functionality similar to its affiliated                   filing of the proposed rule change, the
                                              because they will facilitate the                          exchanges and noted that the proposed                     Commission summarily may
                                              execution of orders that would                            rule changes would be relevant if the                     temporarily suspend such rule change if
                                              otherwise remain unexecuted consistent                    Exchange decides to alter its pricing.                    it appears to the Commission that such
                                              with the intent of the User entering the                     Should BYX determine to change its                     action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
                                              order, thereby increasing the efficient                   fee schedule such that the Post Only                      the public interest; (ii) for the protection
                                              functioning of the Exchange. Further,                     functionality is more relevant to the                     of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
                                              the Super Aggressive order instruction                    operation of the Exchange, BYX stated                     furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
                                              will remain available to all Users in the                 that the proposal to allow an order with                  If the Commission takes such action, the
                                              same way it is today. Thus, Users can                     a Super Aggressive instruction to                         Commission shall institute proceedings
                                              continue to choose between various                        execute against an incoming Post Only                     to determine whether the proposed rule
                                              optional order instructions, including                    order only if the Post Only order is                      should be approved or disapproved.
                                              Super Aggressive, NDS, and others,                        displayable would be consistent with
                                                                                                        the use of the Super Aggressive                           IV. Solicitation of Comments
                                              depending on the order handling they
                                                                                                                                                                    Interested persons are invited to
                                              prefer the Exchange to utilize.                             24 15  U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).                        submit written data, views, and
                                              Therefore, the Exchange does not                            25 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
                                                                                                                                                                  arguments concerning the foregoing,
                                              believe the proposed rule change will
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                                                                                        4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give   including whether the proposed rule
                                              result in any burden on intramarket                       the Commission written notice of its intent to file
                                                                                                        the proposed rule change at least five business days      change is consistent with the Act.
                                              competition that is not necessary or                      prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
                                              appropriate in furtherance of the                         change, or such shorter time as designated by the            28 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
                                              purposes of the Act.                                      Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this               operative delay, the Commission has also
                                                                                                        requirement.                                              considered the proposed rule’s impact on
                                                                                                          26 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
                                                                                                                                                                  efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
                                                23 See   supra note 8.                                    27 See note 4 supra.                                    15 U.S.C. 78c(f).



                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014     18:26 Aug 02, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00075   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM      03AUN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices                                                      38191

                                              Comments may be submitted by any of                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                              the following methods:                                    COMMISSION                                             Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                                                                                                                                               Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                              Electronic Comments                                       [Release No. 34–83739; File No. SR–
                                                                                                        CboeEDGA–2018–013]
                                                                                                                                                               Change
                                                • Use the Commission’s internet                                                                                1. Purpose
                                              comment form (http://www.sec.gov/                         Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
                                              rules/sro.shtml); or                                      EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing                     The Exchange proposes to amend the
                                                                                                        and Immediate Effectiveness of a                       description of the Super Aggressive
                                                • Send an email to rule-comments@                                                                              instruction under paragraph (n)(2) of
                                              sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–                   Proposed Rule Change to Exchange
                                                                                                        Rule 11.6, Definitions, To Amend the                   Exchange Rule 11.6, Routing/Posting
                                              CboeBYX–2018–012 on the subject line.                                                                            Instructions to: (i) Specify that an
                                                                                                        Operation of the Super Aggressive
                                              Paper Comments                                            Order Instruction                                      incoming order with a Post Only
                                                                                                                                                               instruction that would lock a resting
                                                • Send paper comments in triplicate                     July 30, 2018.                                         order with a Super Aggressive
                                              to Secretary, Securities and Exchange                        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                 instruction must include a Displayed
                                              Commission, 100 F Street NE,                              Securities Exchange Act of 1934                        instruction for the order with a Super
                                              Washington, DC 20549–1090.                                (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19–4 thereunder,2                 Aggressive instruction to engage in a
                                                                                                        notice is hereby given that on July 16,                liquidity swap and execute against that
                                              All submissions should refer to File
                                                                                                        2018, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the                    incoming order; and (ii) modify
                                              Number SR–CboeBYX–2018–012. This
                                                                                                        ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the               language from the description of the
                                              file number should be included on the
                                                                                                        Securities and Exchange Commission                     Super Aggressive instruction that states
                                              subject line if email is used. To help the
                                                                                                        (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                     if an order that does not contain a Super
                                              Commission process and review your
                                                                                                        change as described in Items I and II                  Aggressive instruction maintains higher
                                              comments more efficiently, please use
                                                                                                        below, which Items have been prepared                  priority than one or more Super
                                              only one method. The Commission will
                                                                                                        by the Exchange. The Exchange has                      Aggressive eligible orders, the Super
                                              post all comments on the Commission’s
                                                                                                        designated this proposal as a ‘‘non-                   Aggressive eligible order(s) with lower
                                              internet website (http://www.sec.gov/
                                                                                                        controversial’’ proposed rule change                   priority would not be converted and the
                                              rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
                                                                                                        pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the                 incoming order with a Post Only
                                              submission, all subsequent
                                                                                                        Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4                instruction would be posted or
                                              amendments, all written statements
                                                                                                        which renders it effective upon filing                 cancelled in accordance with Exchange
                                              with respect to the proposed rule
                                                                                                        with the Commission. The Commission                    Rule 11.6(n)(4).5
                                              change that are filed with the
                                                                                                        is publishing this notice to solicit                      At the outset, the Exchange notes that
                                              Commission, and all written
                                                                                                        comments on the proposed rule change                   based on the Exchange’s current pricing
                                              communications relating to the
                                                                                                        from interested persons.                               schedule, because EDGA offers rebates
                                              proposed rule change between the
                                              Commission and any person, other than                     I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                      to remove liquidity and charges fees to
                                              those that may be withheld from the                       Statement of the Terms of Substance of                 add liquidity, orders with a Post Only
                                              public in accordance with the                             the Proposed Rule Change                               instruction remove liquidity on entry
                                              provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be                                                                              against resting interest and are not
                                                                                                           The Exchange filed a proposed rule                  booked/displayed if there is contra-side
                                              available for website viewing and                         change to amend paragraph (n)(2) of
                                              printing in the Commission’s Public                                                                              interest. As such, the descriptions below
                                                                                                        Exchange Rule 11.6 related to Super                    of the changes to Rule 11.6(n)(2),
                                              Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,                          Aggressive order instructions.
                                              Washington, DC 20549, on official                                                                                including the examples of the revised
                                                                                                           The text of the proposed rule change                operation of the Super Aggressive
                                              business days between the hours of                        is available at the Exchange’s website at
                                              10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the                                                                           functionality are currently inapplicable
                                                                                                        www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal                 because orders with a Post Only
                                              filing also will be available for                         office of the Exchange, and at the
                                              inspection and copying at the principal                                                                          instruction execute against resting
                                                                                                        Commission’s Public Reference Room.                    liquidity first, before the logic discussed
                                              office of the Exchange. All comments
                                              received will be posted without change.                   II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                     below is triggered. However, consistent
                                              Persons submitting comments are                           Statement of the Purpose of, and                       with its prior practice, the Exchange is
                                              cautioned that we do not redact or edit                   Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                 proposing the changes to Rule 11.6(n)(2)
                                              personal identifying information from                     Change                                                 related to the Super Aggressive
                                              comment submissions. You should                                                                                  instruction in this filing in order to
                                                                                                          In its filing with the Commission, the               retain consistent rules and functionality
                                              submit only information that you wish                     Exchange included statements
                                              to make available publicly. All                                                                                  with its affiliated exchanges 6 to the
                                                                                                        concerning the purpose of and basis for
                                              submissions should refer to File                          the proposed rule change and discussed                   5 The Exchange also proposes to remove the
                                              Number SR–CboeBYX–2018–012, and                           any comments it received on the                        extraneous word ‘‘solely’’ from the second sentence
                                              should be submitted on or before                          proposed rule change. The text of these                of Rule 11.6(n)(2). The removal of this word does
                                              August 24, 2018.                                          statements may be examined at the                      not alter the operation of the Super Aggressive
                                                                                                        places specified in Item IV below. The                 order instruction.
                                                For the Commission, by the Division of                                                                           6 The Exchange notes that its affiliates, Cboe BZX
                                              Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated                Exchange has prepared summaries, set                   Exchange, Inc. and Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc., also
                                                                                                        forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                              authority.29                                                                                                     recently filed to adopt the functionality described
                                              Robert W. Errett,                                         the most significant parts of such                     in this filing and such functionality is applicable on
                                                                                                        statements.                                            such exchanges because orders equivalent to orders
                                              Deputy Secretary.                                                                                                with a Post Only instruction can be entered on such
                                              [FR Doc. 2018–16596 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]                  1 15
                                                                                                                                                               exchanges and do not always remove against
                                                                                                               U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                               contra-side interest on entry pursuant to such
                                              BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                      2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                  exchanges’ fee schedules. See SR–CboeBZX–2018–
                                                                                                          3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
                                                                                                                                                               051 and SR–CboeEDGX–2018–025, each filed July
                                                29 17   CFR 200.30–3(a)(12) and (59).                     4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).                            11, 2018.



                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014     18:26 Aug 02, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00076   Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM   03AUN1



Document Created: 2018-11-06 10:35:04
Document Modified: 2018-11-06 10:35:04
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation83 FR 38187 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR