83 FR 39014 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; NOX
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 153 (August 8, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 153 (August 8, 2018)
| Page Range | 39014-39017 | |
| FR Document | 2018-16778 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 8, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 39014-39017] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-16778] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0507; FRL-9981-77--Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; NOX Ozone Season Emissions Caps for Non-Trading Large NOX Units and Associated Revisions to General Administrative Provisions and Kraft Pulp Mill Regulation AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland. This revision (Maryland SIP Revision #18-03) pertains to a new Maryland regulation that establishes ozone season nitrogen oxides (NOX ) emissions caps and other requirements for large non-electric generating units (non-EGU) in Maryland and includes associated revisions to two other Maryland regulations. The revisions will enable Maryland to meet NOX reduction requirements related to interstate transport of pollution that contributes to other states' nonattainment or interferes with other states' maintenance of the ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 7, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03- OAR-2018-0507 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia [[Page 39015]] submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Powers, (215) 814-2308, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 15, 2018, the State of Maryland, through the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), submitted for approval into the Maryland SIP new Code of Maryland Regulation (COMAR) 26.11.40--NOX Ozone Season Emission Caps for Non-Trading Large NOX Units and revisions to two regulations presently included in the Maryland SIP, COMAR 26.11.01.01--General Administrative Provisions and COMAR 26.11.14--Control of Emissions from Kraft Pulp Mills to EPA. I. Background In October 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA finalized the ``Finding of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain States in the Ozone Transport Assessment Group Region for Purposes of Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone''--commonly called the NOX SIP Call. The NOX SIP Call, issued pursuant to Section 110 of the CAA, was designed to mitigate significant transport of NOX , one of the precursors of ozone. EPA developed the NOX Budget Trading Program, an allowance trading program that states could adopt to meet their obligations under the NOX SIP Call. The NOX Budget Trading Program allowed electric generating units (EGUs) greater than 25 megawatts and industrial non-electric generating units, such as boilers and turbines, with a rated heat input greater than 250 million British thermal units per hour (MMBtu/hr), referred to as ``large non-EGUs'', to participate in a regional NOX cap and trade program. The NOX SIP Call also established specific reduction requirements for other non-EGUs, including cement kilns and stationary internal combustion (IC) engines. On January 10, 2001 (66 FR 1866), EPA approved two Maryland regulations, COMAR 26.11.29--NOX Reduction and Trading Program, and COMAR 26.11.30--Policies and Procedures Relating to Maryland's NOX Reduction and Trading Program, into the Maryland SIP as meeting the requirements of the NOX SIP Call. Under the approved trading program, large EGUs and large non-EGUs in Maryland participated in a regional cap and trade program that was administered by EPA. On May 12, 2005, (70 FR 25162), EPA promulgated the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) to address transported emissions that significantly contributed to downwind states' nonattainment and maintenance of the 1997 ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) NAAQS. CAIR required 28 states, including Maryland, to reduce emissions of NOX and sulfur dioxide (SO2 ), which are precursors to ozone and PM2.5 . Under CAIR, EPA developed separate cap and trade programs for annual NOX , ozone season NOX , and annual SO2 emissions. On April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25328), EPA also promulgated federal implementation plans (FIPs) requiring the EGUs in each affected state, but not large non-EGUs, to participate in the CAIR trading programs. States could comply with the requirements of CAIR by either remaining on the FIP, which applied only to EGUs, or by submitting a CAIR SIP revision that included as trading sources EGUs and the non- EGUs that formerly traded in the NOX Budget Trading Program under the NOX SIP Call. EPA discontinued administration of the NOX Budget Trading Program in 2009 upon the start of the CAIR trading programs.\1\ The NOX SIP Call requirements continued to apply, however, and EGUs that were formerly trading under the NOX Budget Trading Program continued to meet their NOX SIP Call requirements under the generally more stringent requirements of the CAIR ozone season trading program. States needed to assess their NOX SIP Call requirements and take other regulatory action as necessary to ensure that their obligations for the large non-EGUs continued to be met either through submission of a CAIR SIP or other NOX regulation. EPA has implementing regulations for the NOX SIP Call at 40 CFR 51.121. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ CAIR was subsequently vacated and remanded. See North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir. 2008), modified by 550 F.3d 1176 (remanding CAIR). CAIR was replaced with the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, or CSAPR (76 FR 48208, August 8, 2011), which, after legal challenges, was implemented starting in January 2015. The NOX Ozone Season Trading Program under CSAPR was replaced in Maryland and most other states by a new trading program for ozone season NOX under the CSAPR Update rule in January 2017 (81 FR 74504, October 26, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Maryland, Luke Paper Mill (formerly the Westvaco pulp and paper mill) was the only facility with non-EGUs that were affected by the NOX SIP Call and which participated in the NOX Budget Trading Program. When the CAIR NOX Ozone Season trading program replaced the NOX Budget Trading Program, Maryland adopted the CAIR program as it applied to large EGUs, but chose not to include the non-EGUs at Luke as participants in the CAIR NOX Ozone Season trading program.\2\ Instead, in 2010, Maryland adopted COMAR 26.11.14.07-Control of Emissions from Kraft Pulp Mills, which, among other requirements, included provisions that address the NOX SIP Call non-EGU requirements in Maryland through a NOX ozone season tonnage cap of 947 tons for the Luke non-EGUs and monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting in accordance with 40 CFR part 75. EPA conditionally approved COMAR 26.11.14.07 into the Maryland SIP on August 30, 2016 (81 FR 59486) and took final approval on July 17, 2017 (82 FR 32641). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ CAIR became obsolete upon implementation of the CSAPR program. Maryland subsequently took action rescinding its CAIR regulation (COMAR 26.11.28), and submitted a SIP revision to EPA which sought removal of the regulation in its entirety from the approved Maryland SIP. On July 17, 2017 (82 FR 32641), EPA approved the SIP revision removing the CAIR regulation from Maryland's SIP. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subsequent to adoption of COMAR 26.11.14.07, MDE determined that additional applicable units have either started operation or were previously not subject but have become subject to the requirements for non-EGUs under the NOX SIP Call as the units are greater than 250 MMBtu/hr. A review of the applicability of the NOX SIP Call to large non-EGUs in the State showed that there are three additional facilities having non-EGUs that are covered under the NOX SIP Call. MDE adopted new regulation COMAR 26.11.40 to reallocate the NOX emissions cap among the affected sources, and concurrently revised COMAR 26.11.14.07 to reflect a reduced cap for Luke. The NOX annual emissions cap for Maryland established for the NOX SIP Call is 1,013 tons per year of NOX , as established by EPA in 40 CFR part 97, subpart E, Appendix C. II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis On May 15, 2018, Maryland, through MDE, submitted for inclusion in the Maryland SIP new regulation COMAR 26.11.40--NOX Ozone Season Emission Caps for Non-trading Large NOX Units, [[Page 39016]] and associated revisions to COMAR 26.11.01.01--General Administrative Provisions, and COMAR 26.11.14--Control of Emissions from Kraft Pulp Mills. New COMAR 26.11.40 establishes NOX ozone season tonnage caps and NOX monitoring requirements for large non-EGUs in the State that are not covered under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to meet requirements of the NOX SIP Call. Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.40 defines the terms used in COMAR 26.11.40, including ``boiler'', ``combined cycle system'', ``combustion turbine'', ``fossil-fuel'', ``fossil fuel-fired'', ``new unit'', ``new unit set-aside'', ``non-trading large NOX unit'', and ``ozone season''. The definition of non-trading large NOX unit in Regulation .01 lists two categories of sources: (1) Non-EGUs with a maximum design heat input greater than 250 MMBtu/hr, and (2) fossil fuel-fired EGUs serving a generator with a nameplate capacity greater than 25 megawatt output. Maryland explains its intent that these definitions apply to non-EGUs and EGUs as defined for purposes of the NOX SIP Call as amended.\3\ In addition to the definitions of non-trading large NOX unit, Maryland clarifies its intent by specifically listing in Regulation .02 all units in the State that currently meet the definitions. Regulation .01 also clarifies that non-EGUs subject to this rule are units that are not already subject to the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program under 40 CFR part 97, subpart EEEEE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The definitions for non-EGUs and EGUs are set forth in the preamble to the April 2004 NOX SIP Call amendments. See 69 FR 21604 and 21616, April 21, 2004. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regulation .02 under COMAR 26.11.40 lists the currently affected non-EGUs meeting the definition of ``non-trading large NOX unit'' (shown in the following table), and includes a provision that any new unit installed after May 1, 2018 or an existing unit that is modified such that it meets the definition of a large non-EGU will become subject to the requirements of COMAR 26.11.40. Regulation .03 under COMAR 26.11.40 establishes the NOX annual tonnage caps for each source. The affected units and their NOX ozone season caps are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NOX ozone Facility Unit season cap (tons) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ American Sugar Refining........ C6..................... 24 Dominion Energy Cove Point LNG. Frame 5-1 (Turbine 214 S009), Frame 5-2 (Turbine S010), Frame 7-A, Frame 7-B, Aux. A, Aux B. Luke Paper Mill................ 24, 25, and 26......... 656 National Institutes of Health.. 5-1156................. 23 New unit set-aside............. ....................... 96 --------------- Total...................... ....................... 1,013 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Regulation .03 also establishes a 96 ton set aside for new units or modified existing units. The total, 1,013 tons of NOX , is consistent with the portion of the overall Maryland NOX Budget Trading Program budget for large non-EGUs.\4\ Regulation .03 stipulates that the combined NOX ozone season emissions from units subject to COMAR 26.11.40 may not exceed 1,013 tons. Regulation .04 requires continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) of NOX emissions at affected units in accordance with 40 CFR part 75, subpart H, as required by 40 CFR 51.121(i)(4),\5\ maintenance of records and submittal of reports in accordance with 40 CFR part 75, and submittal of CEMs data to the State on a quarterly basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Maryland's NOX Budget Trading Program regulations included an overall budget of 15,466 tons for EGUs and non-EGUs. See, e.g., The NOX Budget Trading Program: 2008 Highlights (October 2009) at 10, available at https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/nox-budget-trading-program-historical-reports. While most of the overall budget was allocated directly to EGUs and non-EGUs (those shares were 13,793 tons and 947 tons, respectively), a 726- ton portion was not assigned to either sector, but instead was placed in set-asides. To identify the portion of the overall 15,466- ton budget attributable to non-EGUs that would be an appropriate cap for its replacement non-EGU rule, Maryland has therefore used the 1,013-ton non-EGU portion of the overall budget of 15,532 tons established for Maryland's EGUs and non-EGUs under a different federal rule promulgated contemporaneously with the NOX SIP Call pursuant to CAA section 126. See 40 CFR part 97, subpart E, appendix C. In the absence of an express division of the State's overall NOX Budget Trading Program budget between EGUs and non-EGUs, EPA believes the State's approach to identifying an appropriate cap for its replacement non-EGU rule is reasonable. \5\ EPA's regulations implementing the NOX SIP Call are in 40 CFR 51.121. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To meet NOX SIP Call requirements and conform to COMAR 26.11.40, Maryland revised regulation .07A of COMAR 26.11.14 Control of emissions from Kraft Pulp Mills to remove the 947 ton ozone season NOX cap that originally applied to the Luke Mill. A new provision in COMAR 26.11.14 establishes Luke's lower NOX cap via a cross reference to Luke's 636 ton per year cap in COMAR 26.11.40.03. Regulation .07B removes the requirements for an owner or operator of a kraft pulp mill that exceeds the emission limit(s) specified in COMAR 26.11.14 to acquire one ozone season NOX allowance for every ton of NOX emissions over the limits to demonstrate compliance, and requires compliance instead to be demonstrated with the 636 ton per year cap via a CEMs meeting 40 CFR part 75. Maryland removed the provision for paper mills such as Luke Mill to acquire additional NOX allowances in order for the sources in the State to remain under Maryland's total NOX ozone season cap for the NOX SIP Call. Correspondingly, Maryland also revised a provision of COMAR 26.11.01--General Administrative Provisions to remove the definition for ``NOX ozone season allowance'' which is no longer necessary because the revisions to COMAR 26.11.14 remove the requirement for fuel burning equipment at Luke to purchase NOX ozone season allowances for any exceedance over its specified limits. EPA finds that this May 2018 SIP submittal meets Maryland's NOX SIP Call requirements (including requirements in CAA section 110 and 40 CFR 51.121) for non-EGUs through: (1) New regulation COMAR 24.11.40 which updates the State's requirements to include all currently applicable large non-EGUs and any new non-EGUs under the NOX SIP Call; (2) the specified state-wide ozone season NOX emissions cap of 1013 tons which is consistent with the portion of the overall Maryland NOX emissions budget under the NOX Budget Trading Program attributable to non-EGUs, and (3) through the 40 CFR part 75 monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements which apply for the affected non-EGUs. In addition, the [[Page 39017]] revisions remove the ability of kraft pulp mills that exceed their NOX limits and caps to comply by purchasing or otherwise acquiring NOX allowances from EPA's ozone season NOX trading program by removing these provisions in COMAR 26.11.14 and 26.11.01. The removal of the provisions allowing purchase of additional allowances removes the potential for increased local NOX emissions. The May 15, 2018 Maryland SIP submittal does not result in increased NOX emissions, and therefore has no impact on any requirements related to attainment, reasonable further progress, or any other NAAQS requirements under the CAA. The submittal therefore meets section 110(l) of the CAA. III. Proposed Action EPA's review of this material indicates that Maryland's May 18, 2018 SIP revision submittal (Maryland SIP Revision #18-03) is approvable in accordance with CAA section 110. For the reasons noted previously, EPA is proposing to approve the Maryland SIP revision submitted on May 15, 2018. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this proposed action, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference new Maryland regulation COMAR 26.11.40 and associated revisions to COMAR 26.11.01 and COMAR 26.11.14.07. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through http://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this action proposing approval of Maryland regulation COMAR 26.11.40 and associated revisions to other COMAR regulations does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: July 24, 2018. Cecil Rodrigues, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2018-16778 Filed 8-7-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![39014 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules
would not interfere with continued beyond those imposed by state law. For Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
attainment of the NAAQS in the South that reason, this proposed action: Dated: July 24, 2018.
Coast Air Basin. The intended effect of • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Michael Stoker,
our proposed conditional approval action’’ subject to review by the Office
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
action is to update the applicable SIP of Management and Budget under
[FR Doc. 2018–16877 Filed 8–7–18; 8:45 am]
with current SCAQMD rules and Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
provide SCAQMD the opportunity to October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
correct the identified deficiencies, as January 21, 2011);
discussed in their commitment letter • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
dated June 26, 2018. If we finalize this
action because SIP approvals are AGENCY
action as proposed, our action would
incorporate this rule into the federally exempted under Executive Order 12866; 40 CFR Part 52
enforceable SIP and be codified through • Does not impose an information
revisions to 40 CFR 52.220 collection burden under the provisions [EPA–R03–OAR–2018–0507; FRL–9981–
(Identification of plan) and 40 CFR of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 77—Region 3]
52.119 (Part D conditional approval). U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
If the State meets its commitment to • Is certified as not having a Approval and Promulgation of Air
submit the required measures within 12 significant economic impact on a Quality Implementation Plans;
months of the date of EPA’s final action, substantial number of small entities Maryland; NOX Ozone Season
Rule 1325 will remain a part of the SIP under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Emissions Caps for Non-Trading Large
until EPA takes final action approving U.S.C. 601 et seq.); NOX Units and Associated Revisions to
or disapproving any subsequently • Does not contain any unfunded General Administrative Provisions and
submitted SIP revision. However, if the mandate or significantly or uniquely Kraft Pulp Mill Regulation
District fails to submit a revision within affect small governments, as described AGENCY: Environmental Protection
the required timeframe, the conditional in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA).
approval will automatically become a of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); ACTION: Proposed rule.
disapproval, and EPA will issue a • Does not have Federalism
finding of disapproval. EPA is not implications as specified in Executive SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
required to propose the finding of Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
disapproval. 1999); state implementation plan (SIP) revision
We will accept comments from the • Is not an economically significant submitted by the State of Maryland.
public on this proposal until September regulatory action based on health or This revision (Maryland SIP Revision
7, 2018. If we take final action to safety risks subject to Executive Order #18–03) pertains to a new Maryland
approve the submitted rule, our final 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); regulation that establishes ozone season
action will incorporate this rule into the • Is not a significant regulatory action nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions caps
federally enforceable SIP. subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR and other requirements for large non-
28355, May 22, 2001); electric generating units (non-EGU) in
IV. Incorporation by Reference • Is not subject to requirements of Maryland and includes associated
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to Section 12(d) of the National revisions to two other Maryland
include in a final EPA rule, regulatory Technology Transfer and Advancement regulations. The revisions will enable
text that includes incorporation by Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because Maryland to meet NOX reduction
reference. In accordance with application of those requirements would requirements related to interstate
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; transport of pollution that contributes to
proposing to incorporate by reference and other states’ nonattainment or interferes
the SCAQMD rule listed in Table 1 of • does not provide the EPA with the with other states’ maintenance of the
this preamble. The EPA has made, and discretionary authority to address ozone national ambient air quality
will continue to make, these materials disproportionate human health or standards (NAAQS). This action is being
available electronically through environmental effects with practical, taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy appropriate, and legally permissible
DATES: Written comments must be
at the EPA Region IX Office (please methods under Executive Order 12898
received on or before September 7,
contact the person identified in the FOR (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
2018.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of In addition, the SIP is not approved
this preamble for more information). to apply on any Indian reservation land ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
or in any other area where the EPA or identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
V. Statutory and Executive Order OAR–2018–0507 at http://
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
Reviews www.regulations.gov, or via email to
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Under the Clean Air Act, the Indian country, the rule does not have spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
Administrator is required to approve a tribal implications and will not impose comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
SIP submission that complies with the substantial direct costs on tribal follow the online instructions for
provisions of the Act and applicable governments or preempt tribal law as submitting comments. Once submitted,
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 comments cannot be edited or removed
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP FR 67249, November 9, 2000). from Regulations.gov. For either manner
submissions, the EPA’s role is to of submission, EPA may publish any
approve state choices, provided that List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 comment received to its public docket.
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Environmental protection, Air Do not submit electronically any
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action pollution control, Incorporation by information you consider to be
merely proposes to approve state law as reference, Intergovernmental relations, confidential business information (CBI)
meeting federal requirements and does Particulate matter, Reporting and or other information whose disclosure is
not impose additional requirements recordkeeping requirements. restricted by statute. Multimedia
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Aug 07, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM 08AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39167/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules 39017
revisions remove the ability of kraft • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Dated: July 24, 2018.
pulp mills that exceed their NOX limits action’’ subject to review by the Office Cecil Rodrigues,
and caps to comply by purchasing or of Management and Budget under Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
otherwise acquiring NOX allowances Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, [FR Doc. 2018–16778 Filed 8–7–18; 8:45 am]
from EPA’s ozone season NOX trading October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
program by removing these provisions January 21, 2011);
in COMAR 26.11.14 and 26.11.01. The • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
removal of the provisions allowing FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
purchase of additional allowances action because SIP approvals are AGENCY
removes the potential for increased local exempted under Executive Order 12866;
NOX emissions. • Does not impose an information 40 CFR Part 52
The May 15, 2018 Maryland SIP collection burden under the provisions [EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0711; FRL–9981–
submittal does not result in increased of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 91—Region 9]
NOX emissions, and therefore has no U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
impact on any requirements related to • Is certified as not having a Approval of California Air Plan
attainment, reasonable further progress, significant economic impact on a Revision, South Coast Air Quality
or any other NAAQS requirements substantial number of small entities Management District
under the CAA. The submittal therefore under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
meets section 110(l) of the CAA. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Agency (EPA).
III. Proposed Action • Does not contain any unfunded
ACTION: Proposed rule.
mandate or significantly or uniquely
EPA’s review of this material affect small governments, as described
indicates that Maryland’s May 18, 2018 SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
SIP revision submittal (Maryland SIP of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); revision to the South Coast Air Quality
Revision #18–03) is approvable in • Does not have federalism Management District (SCAQMD) portion
accordance with CAA section 110. For implications as specified in Executive of the California State Implementation
the reasons noted previously, EPA is Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Plan (SIP). This revision concerns
proposing to approve the Maryland SIP 1999); emissions of volatile organic
revision submitted on May 15, 2018. • Is not an economically significant compounds (VOCs) from architectural
EPA is soliciting public comments on regulatory action based on health or coatings. We are proposing to approve a
the issues discussed in this document. safety risks subject to Executive Order local rule to regulate emissions from
These comments will be considered 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); architectural coatings under the Clean
before taking final action. • Is not a significant regulatory action Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking
IV. Incorporation by Reference subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR comments on this proposal and plan to
In this proposed action, EPA is 28355, May 22, 2001); follow with a final action.
proposing to include in a final EPA rule • Is not subject to requirements of DATES: Any comments must arrive by
regulatory text that includes Section 12(d) of the National September 7, 2018.
incorporation by reference. In Technology Transfer and Advancement ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by application of those requirements would OAR–2016–0711 at http://
reference new Maryland regulation be inconsistent with the CAA; and www.regulations.gov. For comments
COMAR 26.11.40 and associated • Does not provide EPA with the submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
revisions to COMAR 26.11.01 and discretionary authority to address, as online instructions for submitting
COMAR 26.11.14.07. EPA has made, appropriate, disproportionate human comments. Once submitted, comments
and will continue to make, these health or environmental effects, using cannot be removed or edited from
materials generally available through practicable and legally permissible Regulations.gov. For either manner of
http://www.regulations.gov and at the methods, under Executive Order 12898 submission, the EPA may publish any
EPA Region III Office (please contact the (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). comment received to its public docket.
person identified in the FOR FURTHER In addition, this action proposing Do not submit electronically any
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
approval of Maryland regulation information you consider to be
preamble for more information). COMAR 26.11.40 and associated Confidential Business Information (CBI)
revisions to other COMAR regulations or other information whose disclosure is
V. Statutory and Executive Order does not have tribal implications as restricted by statute. Multimedia
Reviews specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
Under the CAA, the Administrator is FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because accompanied by a written comment.
required to approve a SIP submission the SIP is not approved to apply in The written comment is considered the
that complies with the provisions of the Indian country located in the state, and official comment and should include
CAA and applicable federal regulations. EPA notes that it will not impose discussion of all points you wish to
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). substantial direct costs on tribal make. The EPA will generally not
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, governments or preempt tribal law. consider comments or comment
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 contents located outside of the primary
provided that they meet the criteria of submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
the CAA. Accordingly, this action Environmental protection, Air other file sharing system). For
merely approves state law as meeting pollution control, Incorporation by additional submission methods, please
federal requirements and does not reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, contact the person identified in the FOR
impose additional requirements beyond Reporting and recordkeeping FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
those imposed by state law. For that requirements, Sulfur oxides. For the full EPA public comment policy,
reason, this proposed action: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. information about CBI or multimedia
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:59 Aug 07, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08AUP1.SGM 08AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39167/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-08 02:04:45
Document Modified: 2018-08-08 02:04:45
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before September 7, 2018. | |
| Contact | Marilyn Powers, (215) 814-2308, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 39014 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur Oxides |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR