83 FR 44238 - Removal of Dispute Resolution Pilot Program for Public Assistance Appeals
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 169 (August 30, 2018)
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 169 (August 30, 2018)
| Page Range | 44238-44241 | |
| FR Document | 2018-18796 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 44238-44241] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-18796] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency 44 CFR Part 206 [Docket ID: FEMA-2018-0015] RIN 1660-AA94 Removal of Dispute Resolution Pilot Program for Public Assistance Appeals AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is removing its regulations regarding its Dispute Resolution Pilot Program (DRPP) for the Public Assistance Program. The statutory authority for the DRPP sunset on December 31, 2015. DATES: This rule is effective August 30, 2018. ADDRESSES: The docket for this rulemaking is available for inspection using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's instructions. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liza Davis, Associate Chief Counsel, Regulatory Affairs, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, [[Page 44239]] Washington, DC 20472, 202-646-4046, or (email) liza.davis@fema.dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1105 of the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013 (SRIA), Public Law 113-2, 127 Stat. 43 (Jan. 29, 2013), 42 U.S.C. 5189a note, directed FEMA to establish a Dispute Resolution Pilot Program (DRPP). The DRPP allowed applicants to choose arbitration by an independent review panel in lieu of a second appeal to resolve disputes relating to Public Assistance projects. FEMA published a final rule on August 16, 2013 (78 FR 49950) to establish the DRPP. The regulation is located at 44 CFR 206.210. Under section 1105 of SRIA, the authority to accept requests for arbitration pursuant to the DRPP sunset on December 31, 2015. FEMA did not receive any requests for arbitration under the DRPP. As the authority for the DRPP has sunset, FEMA is now removing the regulations from the CFR. Regulatory Analysis Administrative Procedure Act The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires agencies to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register and provide interested persons the opportunity to submit comments. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (c). The APA provides an exception to this requirement for rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A). The final rule that established 44 CFR 206.210 was a rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice, and was promulgated without notice and comment rulemaking. This removal of that rule is also a rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice. Removing these regulations is consistent with FEMA's current statutory authority and does not affect the substantive rights or interests of the public. The APA also provides an exception from notice and comment procedures when an agency finds for good cause that those procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). FEMA finds good cause to issue this rule without prior notice or comment, as such procedures are unnecessary. The removal of these regulations would have no substantive effect on the public because the statutory authority for the DRPP has sunset. The APA generally requires that substantive rules incorporate a 30- day delayed effective date. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). This rule, however, is merely procedural and does not impose substantive requirements; thus, FEMA finds that a delayed effective date is unnecessary. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771 Executive Orders 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and 13563 (``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'') directs agencies to reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process.'' The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it. As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum ``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5, 2017). SRIA included a sunset provision of December 31, 2015 for the DRPP. Accordingly, the program is discontinued and there are no costs or cost savings associated with removing the regulations regarding the DRPP. This rule's benefits include a more streamlined CFR that reflects current program options. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121, 110 Stat. 847, 858-9 (Mar. 29, 1996) (5 U.S.C. 601 note) require that special consideration be given to the effects of regulations on small entities. The RFA applies only when an agency is ``required by section 553 . . . to publish general notice of proposed rulemaking for any proposed rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 603(a). An RFA analysis is not required for this rulemaking because FEMA is not required to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 658, 1501-1504, 1531-1536, 1571, pertains to any rulemaking which is likely to result in the promulgation of any rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million (adjusted annually for inflation) or more in any one year. If the rulemaking includes a Federal mandate, the Act requires an agency to prepare an assessment of the anticipated costs and benefits of the Federal mandate. The Act also pertains to any regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Before establishing any such requirements, an agency must develop a plan allowing for input from the affected governments regarding the requirements. FEMA has determined that this rulemaking will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, nor by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year as a result of a Federal mandate, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions are deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13, 109 Stat. 163, (May 22, 1995) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), FEMA may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid control number. Due to this final rule, FEMA will remove FEMA Form 055-0-0-1, Request for Arbitration and Recommendation resulting from Dispute Resolution Pilot Program from information collection, OMB Control Number 1660-0017, Public Assistance Program. Since the program is discontinued, the form is no longer required, and FEMA is removing the associated hour burden estimates which equal 60 hours. Thus, the total hour burden for this collection is being reduced from 425,736 to 425,676. Collection of Information Title: Public Assistance Program. OMB Number: 1660-0017. [[Page 44240]] FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 009-0-49 Request for Public Assistance; FEMA Form 009-0-91 Project Worksheet (PW); FEMA Form 009-0-91A Project Worksheet (PW)--Damage Description and Scope of Work Continuation Sheet; FEMA Form 009-0-91B Project Worksheet (PW)--Cost Estimate Continuation Sheet; FEMA Form 009-0-91C Project Worksheet (PW)--Maps and Sketches Sheet; FEMA Form 009-0-91D Project Worksheet (PW)--Photo Sheet; FEMA Form 009-0-120 Special Considerations Questions; FEMA Form 009-0-121 PNP Facility Questionnaire; FEMA Form 009-0-123 Force Account Labor Summary Record; FEMA Form 009-0-124 Materials Summary Record; FEMA Form 009-0-125 Rented Equipment Summary Record; FEMA Form 009-0- 126 Contract Work Summary Record; FEMA Form 009-0-127 Force Account Equipment Summary Record; FEMA Form 009-0-128 Applicant's Benefits Calculation Worksheet; and FEMA Form 009-0-111, Quarterly Progress Reports. Abstract: The information collected is utilized by FEMA to make determinations for Public Assistance grants based on the information supplied by the respondents. Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal government. Estimated Number of Respondents: 1012. Estimated Number of Responses: 398,068. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 425,676. Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents for the hour burden is $26,306,779. Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: None. Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: None. Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $805,311.96. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments,'' 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000, applies to agency regulations that have Tribal implications, that is, regulations that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Under this Executive Order, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, no agency shall promulgate any regulation that has Tribal implications, that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments, and that is not required by statute, unless funds necessary to pay the direct costs incurred by the Indian Tribal government or the Tribe in complying with the regulation are provided by the Federal Government, or the agency consults with Tribal officials. FEMA is removing the DRPP regulations, whose legislative authority has sunset. The removal of these regulations will have no substantive effect on the public since the statutory authority for the program has sunset and will not affect the substantive rights or interests of Indian Tribal governments. Executive Order 13132, Federalism Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999, sets forth principles and criteria that agencies must adhere to in formulating and implementing policies that have federalism implications, that is, regulations that have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Federal agencies must closely examine the statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States, and to the extent practicable, must consult with State and local officials before implementing any such action. FEMA has determined that this rulemaking does not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, and therefore does not have federalism implications as defined by the Executive Order. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an agency must prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement for any rulemaking that significantly affects the quality of the human environment. FEMA has determined that this rulemaking does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment and consequently has not prepared an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. Rulemaking is a major Federal action subject to NEPA. Categorical exclusion A3 included in the list of exclusion categories at Department of Homeland Security Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Revision 01, Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act, Appendix A, issued November 6, 2014, covers the promulgation of rules, issuance of rulings or interpretations, and the development and publication of policies, orders, directives, notices, procedures, manuals, and advisory circulars if they meet certain criteria provided in A3(a-f). This rule meets Categorical Exclusion A3(a), which covers rules of a strictly administrative or procedural nature. Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking Under the Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 801-808, before a rule can take effect, the Federal agency promulgating the rule must submit to Congress and to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) a copy of the rule; a concise general statement relating to the rule, including whether it is a major rule; the proposed effective date of the rule; a copy of any cost-benefit analysis; descriptions of the agency's actions under the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; and any other information or statements required by relevant executive orders. FEMA has sent this final rule to the Congress and to GAO pursuant to the CRA. The rule is not a ``major rule'' within the meaning of the CRA. It will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; it will not result in a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; and it will not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets. List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 206 Administrative practice and procedure, Coastal zone, Community facilities, Disaster assistance, Fire prevention, Grant programs-- housing and community development, Housing, Insurance, Intergovernmental relations, Loan programs--housing and community development, Natural resources, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Federal Emergency Management Agency amends 44 CFR part 206 as set forth below: [[Page 44241]] PART 206--FEDERAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE 0 1. The authority citation for part 206 is revised to read as follows: Authority: Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 through 5207; Homeland Security Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 9001.1. Sec. 206.210 [Removed and Reserved] 0 2. Remove Sec. 206.210. Dated: August 23, 2018. Brock Long, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. [FR Doc. 2018-18796 Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-11-P
![44238 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 169 / Thursday, August 30, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Business Regulatory Enforcement Filing a petition for reconsideration by PART 52—APPROVAL AND
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides the Administrator of this final rule does PROMULGATION OF
that before a rule may take effect, the not affect the finality of this action for IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
agency promulgating the rule must the purposes of judicial review nor does
submit a rule report, which includes a it extend the time within which a ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
copy of the rule, to each House of the petition for judicial review may be filed, continues to read as follows:
Congress and to the Comptroller General and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of the United States. EPA will submit a of such rule or action. This action may Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
report containing this action and other not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section Subpart LL—Oklahoma
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and 307(b)(2).)
the Comptroller General of the United ■ 2. In § 52.1920(c), the table titled
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 ‘‘EPA Approved Oklahoma Regulations’’
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule Environmental protection, Air is amended by revising the entries for
cannot take effect until 60 days after it pollution control, Incorporation by Sections 252:100–2–3; 252:100–5–2;
is published in the Federal Register. reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 252:100–5–2.1; 252:100–5–3; and
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as Particulate matter, Reporting and 252:100, Appendix Q to read as follows:
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds. § 52.1920 Identification of plan.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Dated: August 23, 2018. * * * * *
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United Anne Idsal, (c) * * *
States Court of Appeals for the Regional Administrator, Region 6.
appropriate circuit by October 29, 2018. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
EPA APPROVED OKLAHOMA REGULATIONS
State citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date Explanation
* * * * * * *
252:100–2–3 ............... Incorporation by reference ........... 9/15/2016 8/30/2018, [Insert Federal Reg-
ister citation].
* * * * * * *
252:100–5–2 ............... Registration of potential sources 9/12/2014 8/30/2018, [Insert Federal Reg-
of air contaminants. ister citation].
252:100–5–2.1 ............ Emission inventory ....................... 9/15/2016 8/30/2018, [Insert Federal Reg-
ister citation].
* * * * * * *
252:100–5–3 ............... Confidentiality of proprietary infor- 9/12/2014 8/30/2018, [Insert Federal Reg-
mation. ister citation].
* * * * * * *
252:100, Appendix Q .. Incorporation by reference ........... 9/15/2016 8/30/2018, [Insert Federal Reg-
ister citation].
* * * * * * *
* * * * * DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND removing its regulations regarding its
[FR Doc. 2018–18657 Filed 8–29–18; 8:45 am] SECURITY Dispute Resolution Pilot Program
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P (DRPP) for the Public Assistance
Federal Emergency Management Program. The statutory authority for the
Agency DRPP sunset on December 31, 2015.
44 CFR Part 206 DATES: This rule is effective August 30,
2018.
[Docket ID: FEMA–2018–0015]
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
RIN 1660–AA94 rulemaking is available for inspection
Removal of Dispute Resolution Pilot using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
Program for Public Assistance http://www.regulations.gov and can be
Appeals viewed by following that website’s
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
instructions.
AGENCY: Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liza
ACTION: Final rule. Davis, Associate Chief Counsel,
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Chief
SUMMARY:The Federal Emergency Counsel, Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) is Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 Aug 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_44407/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 169 / Thursday, August 30, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 44241
PART 206—FEDERAL DISASTER A257, Washington, DC 20554. The Bureau (the Bureaus), published a map
ASSISTANCE complete text is also available on the of areas presumptively eligible for MF–
Commission’s website at http:// II support based on a one-time
■ 1. The authority citation for part 206 wireless.fcc.gov, or by using the search collection by the Commission of 4G LTE
is revised to read as follows: function on the ECFS web page at coverage data and subsidy data from the
Authority: Robert T. Stafford Disaster http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Universal Service Administrative
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 Alternative formats are available to Company (USAC).
U.S.C. 5121 through 5207; Homeland persons with disabilities by sending an 2. The MF–II Challenge Process Order,
Security Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; email to fcc504@fcc.gov or by calling the 82 FR 42473, September 8, 2017,
Department of Homeland Security Delegation Consumer & Governmental Affairs established the framework for a robust
9001.1. Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) challenge process that will refine the
§ 206.210 [Removed and Reserved] 418–0432 (TTY). map of areas presumptively eligible to
receive MF–II support. This challenge
■ 2. Remove § 206.210. I. Synposis process is designed to efficiently resolve
Dated: August 23, 2018. On August 21, 2018, the Commission disputes about areas that are
Brock Long, released an ‘‘Order, Notice of Proposed presumptively ineligible through the
Rulemaking, and Memorandum Opinion submission, analysis, and validation of
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency. and Order’’ (August 21 Order). The mobile network speed test data. The
Commission separately published the Commission initially established a 150-
[FR Doc. 2018–18796 Filed 8–29–18; 8:45 am]
proposed modifications to the speed test day challenge window for interested
BILLING CODE 9110–11–P
data specifications regarding the parties to contest the initial
relevant timeframes for valid speed tests determination of areas deemed
for the August 21 Order elsewhere in presumptively ineligible for MF–II
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS this issue of the Federal Register. In the support. The challenge window opened
COMMISSION August 21 Order, the Commission on March 29, 2018, and it was
extended the previously announced scheduled to close on August 27, 2018.
47 CFR Part 54
deadline for the close of the Mobility 3. As part of the challenge process
[WC Docket No. 10–90, WT Docket No. 10– Fund Phase II (MF–II) challenge framework, the Commission established
208; FCC 18–124] window by an additional 90 days. various parameters for the acceptance of
Challengers were given until November speed test data, including that such data
Connect America Fund Universal 26, 2018, to submit speed test data in would only be accepted if they were
Service Reform—Mobility Fund support of a challenge. The Commission collected within six months of the
AGENCY: Federal Communications adopted this extension to ensure that scheduled close of the challenge
Commission. interested parties can initiate and window. That six-month period
submit speed test data for areas they commenced on February 27, 2018. After
ACTION: Final action; extension of filing
wish to challenge. In addition, given the close of the challenge window, a
period; petitions for reconsideration.
this extension, the Commission respondent (i.e., a ‘‘challenged party’’)
SUMMARY: This document addresses two proposed to make modifications to the will have the opportunity to respond to
applications for review regarding the speed test data specifications regarding challenges by submitting its own speed
procedures and parameters of the the relevant timeframes for valid speed test data or certain technical
Mobility Fund II challenge process and tests. The Commission also addressed information that is probative of the
grant in part and deny in part a related two applications for review regarding validity of the challenger’s speed tests.
extension request. the procedures and parameters of the Speed test data submitted by
MF–II challenge process and granted in respondents is subject to the same
DATES: This Order is effective August
part and denied in part a related standards and requirements applicable
30, 2018. The window for filing
extension request. to challengers, except that the
challenges to ineligible areas extended
Commission established in the MF–II
to November 26, 2018. II. Order Extending the Challenge
Challenge Process Order that it would
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Window
only accept data submitted by a
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 1. In February 2017, the Commission respondent that was collected within six
Auctions and Spectrum Access adopted rules to move forward on a months of the scheduled close of the
Division, Audra Hale-Maddox, at (202) reverse auction that will direct up to response window.
418–0660. $4.53 billion of MF–II support over ten 4. After the Commission adopted the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a years to providers in geographic areas timeframe for the challenge window, the
summary of the final actions in the lacking unsubsidized 4G Long Term Rural Wireless Association (RWA)
Federal Communications Commission Evolution (LTE) services. The submitted data regarding estimated
(‘‘Commission’’) Order, Notice of Commission also determined that it burdens of the challenge process,
Proposed Rulemaking and would compile a list of areas that were including specific estimates of the
Memorandum Opinion and Order presumptively eligible for MF–II amount of time required to conduct
(Combined Order), FCC 18–124, support and provide a limited speed tests in certain areas.
adopted on August 14, 2018, and timeframe before the auction during 5. The Commission extended the
released on August 21, 2018. The which interested parties could challenge previously established deadline for
complete text of this document is areas that were not listed as challengers to submit data in the
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
available for public inspection and presumptively eligible (i.e., challenge process and provide an
copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern ‘‘presumptively ineligible’’ areas). In additional 90 days, until November 26,
Time (ET) Monday through Thursday or February 2018, the Rural Broadband 2018, for the submission and
from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays Auctions Task Force, in conjunction certification of challenges. The
in the FCC Reference Information with the Wireless Telecommunications Commission direct USAC to implement
Center, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY– Bureau and the Wireline Competition this change in the challenge portal.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 Aug 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_44407/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-30 01:21:29
Document Modified: 2018-08-30 01:21:29
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective August 30, 2018. | |
| Contact | Liza Davis, Associate Chief Counsel, Regulatory Affairs, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, 202-646-4046, or (email) [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 44238 | |
| RIN Number | 1660-AA94 | |
| CFR Associated | Administrative Practice and Procedure; Coastal Zone; Community Facilities; Disaster Assistance; Fire Prevention; Grant Programs-Housing and Community Development; Housing; Insurance; Intergovernmental Relations; Loan Programs-Housing and Community Development; Natural Resources; Penalties and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR