83 FR 44927 - FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation Company, LLC; Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 171 (September 4, 2018)

Page Range		44927-44929
FR Document		2018-19122

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is making a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for a proposed issuance of an exemption to FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC, the licensee), for Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP), Unit No. 1, located in Lake County, Ohio. The proposed action would grant the licensee a partial exemption from the ``Physical barrier'' requirements in the NRC's regulations, to allow FENOC to continue using vertical, rather than angled, barbed wire fence toppings in certain limited protected area sections on-site. The NRC is considering an exemption to facility operating license no. NPF-58, issued on November 13, 1986, and held by FENOC, and FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation Company, LLC for the operation of PNPP, Unit No. 1.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 171 (Tuesday, September 4, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44927-44929]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-440; NRC-2018-0187]

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; FirstEnergy Nuclear
Generation Company, LLC; Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is making a
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for a proposed issuance of an
exemption to FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC, the
licensee), for Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP), Unit No. 1, located in
Lake County, Ohio. The proposed action would grant the licensee a
partial exemption from the ``Physical barrier'' requirements in the
NRC's regulations, to allow FENOC to continue using vertical, rather
than angled, barbed wire fence toppings in certain limited protected
area sections on-site. The NRC is considering an exemption to facility
operating license no. NPF-58, issued on November 13, 1986, and held by
FENOC, and FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation Company, LLC for the
operation of PNPP, Unit No. 1.

DATES: The environmental assessment referenced in this document is
available on September 4, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0187 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0187. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301-287-
9127; email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. For the convenience of the reader,
the ADAMS accession numbers are provided in a table in the
``Availability of Documents'' section of this document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3308; email:
Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

The NRC is considering issuance of a partial exemption, pursuant to
section 73.5 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
``Specific exemptions,'' from the ``Physical barrier'' requirement of
10 CFR 73.2, specifically with respect to the design criteria specified
in 10 CFR 73.2(1) ``fences,'' as it applies to the angular
specification for brackets used to support the required barbed wire (or
similar material) topper, to FENOC and FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation
Company, LLC (collectively, the licensee), for PNPP, Unit No. 1,
located in Lake County, Ohio.
In accordance with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC has prepared an
environmental assessment (EA) that analyzes the environmental effects
of the proposed action. Based on the results of the EA and in
accordance with 10 CFR 51.31(a), the NRC has prepared a FONSI for the
proposed exemption.

II. Environmental Assessment

Description of the Proposed Action

The proposed action would grant the licensee a partial exemption
from the

[[Page 44928]]

``physical barrier'' requirement of 10 CFR 73.2, specifically with
respect to the design criteria specified in 10 CFR 73.2(1) ``fences,''
as it applies to the angular specification for brackets used to support
the required barbed wire (or similar material) topper. As stated in 10
CFR 73.2, fences must be constructed of No. 11 American wire gauge, or
heavier wire fabric, topped by three strands or more of barbed wire or
similar material on brackets angled inward or outward between 30 and 45
degrees from the vertical, with an overall height of not less than
eight feet, including the barbed topping. If approved, the partial
exemption would allow the licensee to continue to use, without
modification, the current configuration of vertical barbed wire fence
toppings in limited protected area sections on-site, as specified on
the maps submitted by the licensee in its letter dated March 16, 2018,
to meet the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR part 73, ``Physical
protection of plants and materials.'' Specifically, barbed wire on top
of physical barrier fencing on gates, near gates, near interfaces with
buildings, and on corners is oriented vertically.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application dated July 19, 2017, as supplemented by letters dated March
16, 2018; and May 2, 2018.

Need for the Proposed Action

Physical protection consists of a variety of measures to protect
nuclear facilities and material against sabotage, theft, diversion, and
other malicious acts. The NRC and its licensees use a graded approach
for physical protection, consistent with the significance of the
facilities or material to be protected. In so doing, the NRC
establishes the regulatory requirements and assesses compliance, and
licensees are responsible for providing the protection.
The proposed action is needed to allow the licensee to continue to
use, without modification, the current configuration of vertical barbed
wire fence toppings in certain limited protected area sections on-site,
as shown on the maps submitted by the licensee in its March 16, 2018,
letter. Currently, some of the barbed wire bracketing on top of the
protected area physical barrier fencing do not meet certain design
criteria specified in 10 CFR 73.2. Specifically, barbed wire on top of
physical barrier fencing on gates, near gates, near interfaces with
buildings, and on corners is oriented vertically.
Separate from this EA, the NRC staff is evaluating the licensee's
proposed action, which will be documented in a safety evaluation
report. The staff's review will determine whether there is reasonable
assurance that the site maintains adequate protection from the current
physical barriers in accordance with the requirements in 10 CFR part
73.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

The NRC has completed its environmental evaluation of the proposed
action. The proposed action would grant the licensee a partial
exemption from the ``physical barrier'' requirement of 10 CFR 73.2,
specifically with respect to the design criteria specified in 10 CFR
73.2(1) ``fences,'' as it applies to the angular specification for
brackets used to support the required barbed wire (or similar material)
topper. This will allow the licensee to continue using vertical, rather
than angled, barbed wire fence toppings in certain limited protected
area sections on site.
The proposed action would have no direct impacts on land use or
water resources, including terrestrial and aquatic biota as the
proposed action involves no new construction or modification of plant
operational systems. There would be no changes to the quality or
quantity of non-radiological effluents. No changes to the plant's
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit are needed. In
addition, there would be no noticeable effect on air pollutant
emissions, socio-economic conditions in the region, no environment
justice impacts, and no impacts to historic and cultural resources.
Therefore, there would be no significant non-radiological impacts
associated with the proposed action.
The NRC has concluded that the proposed action would not
significantly affect plant safety and would not have a significant
adverse effect on the probability of an accident occurring. There would
be no change to radioactive effluents that affect radiation exposures
to plant workers and members of the public. No changes would be made to
plant buildings or the site property. Therefore, implementing the
proposed action would not result in a change to the radiation exposures
to the public or radiation exposure to plant workers.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC considered denial
of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). Denial of
the exemption request would result in the licensee having to replace
the vertical barbed wire fence toppings with angled barbed wire that
meets the definition of ``Physical barrier'' in 10 CFR 73.2. This could
result in temporary, minor changes in vehicular traffic and associated
air pollutant emissions due to any construction-related impacts of
performing the necessary modifications, but no significant changes in
ambient air quality would be expected.

Alternative Use of Resources

There are no unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of
available resources under the proposed action.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

The NRC staff did not enter into consultation with any other
Federal agency or with the State of Ohio regarding the environmental
impact of the proposed action.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

The licensee has requested an exemption from the ``physical
barrier'' requirement of 10 CFR 73.2, specifically with respect to the
design criteria specified in 10 CFR 73.2(1) ``fences,'' to allow the
licensee to continue using vertical, rather than angled, barbed wire
fence toppings in limited protected area sections on site. The NRC is
considering issuing the requested exemption. The proposed action would
not significantly affect plant safety, would not have a significant
adverse effect on the probability of an accident occurring, and would
not have any significant radiological and non-radiological impacts.
This FONSI incorporates by reference the EA in Section II of this
notice. Therefore, the NRC concludes that the proposed action will not
have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental
impact statement for the proposed action.
The related environmental document is NUREG-0884, ``Final
Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Perry Nuclear Power
Plant, Units 1 and 2,'' which provides the latest description of
environmental conditions at Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1.

IV. Availability of Documents

The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as
indicated.

[[Page 44929]]

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document ADAMS accession No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; ML17200D139.
Exemption Request for a Physical
Barrier Requirement; Dated July 19,
2017.
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; ML18078A033.
Response to Request For Additional
Information Regarding Exemption Request
for a Physical Barrier Requirement;
Dated March 16, 2018.
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; ML18122A133.
Response to Request For Additional
Information Regarding Exemption Request
for a Physical Barrier Requirement;
Dated May 2, 2018.
NUREG-0884; Final Environmental ML15134A060.
Statement Related to the Operation of
Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and
2; Dated August 1982.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of August 2018.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bhalchandra K. Vaidya,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2018-19122 Filed 8-31-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P

44928 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2018 / Notices

‘‘physical barrier’’ requirement of 10 Separate from this EA, the NRC staff proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
CFR 73.2, specifically with respect to is evaluating the licensee’s proposed alternative). Denial of the exemption
the design criteria specified in 10 CFR action, which will be documented in a request would result in the licensee
73.2(1) ‘‘fences,’’ as it applies to the safety evaluation report. The staff’s having to replace the vertical barbed
angular specification for brackets used review will determine whether there is wire fence toppings with angled barbed
to support the required barbed wire (or reasonable assurance that the site wire that meets the definition of
similar material) topper. As stated in 10 maintains adequate protection from the ‘‘Physical barrier’’ in 10 CFR 73.2. This
CFR 73.2, fences must be constructed of current physical barriers in accordance could result in temporary, minor
No. 11 American wire gauge, or heavier with the requirements in 10 CFR part changes in vehicular traffic and
wire fabric, topped by three strands or 73. associated air pollutant emissions due
more of barbed wire or similar material Environmental Impacts of the Proposed to any construction-related impacts of
on brackets angled inward or outward Action performing the necessary modifications,
between 30 and 45 degrees from the but no significant changes in ambient
vertical, with an overall height of not The NRC has completed its air quality would be expected.
less than eight feet, including the barbed environmental evaluation of the
proposed action. The proposed action Alternative Use of Resources
topping. If approved, the partial
exemption would allow the licensee to would grant the licensee a partial There are no unresolved conflicts
continue to use, without modification, exemption from the ‘‘physical barrier’’ concerning alternative uses of available
the current configuration of vertical requirement of 10 CFR 73.2, specifically resources under the proposed action.
barbed wire fence toppings in limited with respect to the design criteria
specified in 10 CFR 73.2(1) ‘‘fences,’’ as Agencies and Persons Consulted
protected area sections on-site, as
specified on the maps submitted by the it applies to the angular specification for The NRC staff did not enter into
licensee in its letter dated March 16, brackets used to support the required consultation with any other Federal
2018, to meet the regulatory barbed wire (or similar material) topper. agency or with the State of Ohio
requirements of 10 CFR part 73, This will allow the licensee to continue regarding the environmental impact of
‘‘Physical protection of plants and using vertical, rather than angled, the proposed action.
materials.’’ Specifically, barbed wire on barbed wire fence toppings in certain
limited protected area sections on site. III. Finding of No Significant Impact
top of physical barrier fencing on gates,
The proposed action would have no
near gates, near interfaces with The licensee has requested an
direct impacts on land use or water
buildings, and on corners is oriented exemption from the ‘‘physical barrier’’
resources, including terrestrial and
vertically. requirement of 10 CFR 73.2, specifically
aquatic biota as the proposed action
The proposed action is in accordance involves no new construction or with respect to the design criteria
with the licensee’s application dated modification of plant operational specified in 10 CFR 73.2(1) ‘‘fences,’’ to
July 19, 2017, as supplemented by systems. There would be no changes to allow the licensee to continue using
letters dated March 16, 2018; and May the quality or quantity of non- vertical, rather than angled, barbed wire
2, 2018. radiological effluents. No changes to the fence toppings in limited protected area
plant’s National Pollutant Discharge sections on site. The NRC is considering
Need for the Proposed Action issuing the requested exemption. The
Elimination System permit are needed.
Physical protection consists of a In addition, there would be no proposed action would not significantly
variety of measures to protect nuclear noticeable effect on air pollutant affect plant safety, would not have a
facilities and material against sabotage, emissions, socio-economic conditions in significant adverse effect on the
theft, diversion, and other malicious the region, no environment justice probability of an accident occurring,
acts. The NRC and its licensees use a impacts, and no impacts to historic and and would not have any significant
graded approach for physical protection, cultural resources. Therefore, there radiological and non-radiological
consistent with the significance of the would be no significant non-radiological impacts. This FONSI incorporates by
facilities or material to be protected. In impacts associated with the proposed reference the EA in Section II of this
so doing, the NRC establishes the action. notice. Therefore, the NRC concludes
regulatory requirements and assesses The NRC has concluded that the that the proposed action will not have
compliance, and licensees are proposed action would not significantly a significant effect on the quality of the
responsible for providing the protection. affect plant safety and would not have human environment. Accordingly, the
The proposed action is needed to a significant adverse effect on the NRC has determined not to prepare an
allow the licensee to continue to use, probability of an accident occurring. environmental impact statement for the
without modification, the current There would be no change to proposed action.
configuration of vertical barbed wire radioactive effluents that affect radiation The related environmental document
fence toppings in certain limited exposures to plant workers and is NUREG–0884, ‘‘Final Environmental
protected area sections on-site, as members of the public. No changes Statement Related to the Operation of
shown on the maps submitted by the would be made to plant buildings or the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and
licensee in its March 16, 2018, letter. site property. Therefore, implementing 2,’’ which provides the latest
Currently, some of the barbed wire the proposed action would not result in description of environmental conditions
bracketing on top of the protected area a change to the radiation exposures to at Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No.
physical barrier fencing do not meet 1.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

the public or radiation exposure to plant
certain design criteria specified in 10 workers. IV. Availability of Documents
CFR 73.2. Specifically, barbed wire on
top of physical barrier fencing on gates, Environmental Impacts of the The documents identified in the
near gates, near interfaces with Alternatives to the Proposed Action following table are available to
buildings, and on corners is oriented As an alternative to the proposed interested persons through one or more
vertically. action, the NRC considered denial of the of the following methods, as indicated.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:54 Aug 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2018 / Notices 44929

Document ADAMS accession No.

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; Exemption Request for a Physical Barrier Requirement; Dated July 19, ML17200D139.
2017.
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; Response to Request For Additional Information Regarding Exemption Re- ML18078A033.
quest for a Physical Barrier Requirement; Dated March 16, 2018.
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; Response to Request For Additional Information Regarding Exemption Re- ML18122A133.
quest for a Physical Barrier Requirement; Dated May 2, 2018.
NUREG–0884; Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; ML15134A060.
Dated August 1982.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day proposed rule change, or institute amend its loss allocation rules and make
of August 2018. proceedings to determine whether the other conforming and technical
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. proposed rule change should be changes.3 The proposed rule change was
Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, disapproved. The 45th day for this filing published for comment in the Federal
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III, is August 30, 2018.
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, The Commission is extending the 45- 3 On December 18, 2017, FICC filed the proposed
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. day time period for Commission action rule change as advance notice SR–FICC–2017–806
[FR Doc. 2018–19122 Filed 8–31–18; 8:45 am] on the proposed rule change. The with the Commission pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Commission finds that it is appropriate of Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
to designate a longer period within and Consumer Protection Act entitled the Payment,
Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010
which to take action on the proposed (‘‘Clearing Supervision Act’’) and Rule 19b–
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE rule change so that it has sufficient time 4(n)(1)(i) of the Act (‘‘Advance Notice’’). 12 U.S.C.
COMMISSION to consider the proposed rule change. 5465(e)(1) and 17 CFR 240.19b–4(n)(1)(i),
Accordingly, pursuant to Section respectively. The Advance Notice was published for
[Release No. 34–83975; File No. SR– 19(b)(2) of the Act 5 and for the reasons comment in the Federal Register on January 30,
2018. In that publication, the Commission also
MIAX–2018–14] stated above, the Commission extended the review period of the Advance Notice
designates October 14, 2018, as the date for an additional 60 days, pursuant to Section
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami by which the Commission shall either 806(e)(1)(H) of the Clearing Supervision Act. 12
International Securities Exchange LLC; approve or disapprove, or institute U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(H); Securities Exchange Act
Notice of Designation of Longer Period proceedings to determine whether to Release No. 82583 (January 24, 2018), 83 FR 4358
for Commission Action on Proposed (January 30, 2018) (SR–FICC–2017–806). On April
disapprove, the proposed rule change
Rule Change To List and Trade 10, 2018, the Commission required additional
(File No. SR–MIAX–2018–14). information from FICC pursuant to Section
Options on the SPIKESTM Index 806(e)(1)(D) of the Clearing Supervision Act, which
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated tolled the Commission’s period of review of the
August 28, 2018.
authority.6 Advance Notice until 60 days from the date the
On June 28, 2018, Miami International information required by the Commission was
Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX Eduardo A. Aleman, received by the Commission. 12 U.S.C.
Options’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Assistant Secretary. 5465(e)(1)(D); see 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(E)(ii) and
Securities and Exchange Commission [FR Doc. 2018–19057 Filed 8–31–18; 8:45 am] (G)(ii); see Memorandum from the Office of
Clearance and Settlement Supervision, Division of
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Trading and Markets, titled ‘‘Commission’s Request
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act for Additional Information,’’ available at https://
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 www.sec.gov/rules/sro/ficc-an.htm. On June 28,
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 2018, FICC filed Amendment No. 1 to the Advance
permit the listing and trading of options COMMISSION Notice to amend and replace in its entirety the
on the SPIKESTM Index, which Advance Notice as originally filed on December 18,
[Release No. 34–83970; File No. SR–FICC– 2017, which was published in the Federal Register
measures expected 30-day volatility of 2017–022] on August 6, 2018. Securities Exchange Act Release
the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. The No. 83747 (July 31, 2018), 83 FR 38393 (August 6,
proposed rule change was published for Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed 2018) (SR–FICC–2017–806). FICC submitted a
comment in the Federal Register on July Income Clearing Corporation; Order courtesy copy of Amendment No. 1 to the Advance
16, 2018.3 The Commission has received Approving a Proposed Rule Change, Notice through the Commission’s electronic public
comment letter mechanism. Accordingly,
no comments on the proposal. as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amendment No. 1 to the Advance Notice has been
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides Amend the Loss Allocation Rules and publicly available on the Commission’s website at
that within 45 days of the publication of Make Other Changes https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/ficc-an.htm since
notice of the filing of a proposed rule June 29, 2018. On July 6, 2018, the Commission
change, or within such longer period up August 28, 2018. received a response to its request for additional
to 90 days as the Commission may On December 18, 2017, Fixed Income information in consideration of the Advance Notice,
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed which, in turn, added a further 60 days to the
designate if it finds such longer period review period pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)(E) and
to be appropriate and publishes its with the Securities and Exchange (G) of the Clearing Supervision Act. 12 U.S.C.
reasons for so finding or as to which the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed 5465(e)(1)(E) and (G); see Memorandum from the
self-regulatory organization consents, rule change SR–FICC–2017–022 Office of Clearance and Settlement Supervision,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

the Commission shall either approve the pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Division of Trading and Markets, titled ‘‘Response
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to the Commission’s Request for Additional
proposed rule change, disapprove the Information,’’ available at https://www.sec.gov/
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder 2 to rules/sro/ficc-an.htm. The Commission did not
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). receive any comments. The proposal, as set forth in
2 17 5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 240.19b–4. both the Advance Notice and the proposed rule
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83619 6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31). change, each as modified by Amendments No. 1,
(July 11, 2018), 83 FR 32932. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
shall not take effect until all required regulatory
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. actions are completed.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:54 Aug 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1

Document Created: 2018-09-01 02:59:55
Document Modified: 2018-09-01 02:59:55

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance.
Dates		The environmental assessment referenced in this document is available on September 4, 2018.
Contact		Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3308; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 44927