83 FR 45415 - Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 174 (September 7, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 174 (September 7, 2018)
| Page Range | 45415-45417 | |
| FR Document | 2018-19428 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 45415-45417] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-19428] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI) and Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co. (HEES) (collectively, Hyundai) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value, and that Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value, during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable September 7, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua DeMoss, Tyler Weinhold, or John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3362, (202) 482-1121, or (202) 482-0195, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce initiated this review on October 16, 2017.\1\ We selected two mandatory respondents in this review, Hyosung and HHI.\2\ Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. The revised deadline for the preliminary results of this review is August 31, 2018.\3\ For a more detailed description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 48051 (October 16, 2017) (Initiation Notice). \2\ In accordance with Commerce's decision in the LPTs from Korea changed circumstances review, Commerce has determined that HEES is the successor-in-interest to HHI. See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 83 FR 24973 (May 31, 2018) (LPTs from Korea CCR) (unchanged in Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, signed August 28, 2018; pending publication). \3\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. \4\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from James Maeder, Senior Director, performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2016-2017'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and [[Page 45416]] is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The full text of the scope of the order is contained in Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Facts Available Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, Commerce is preliminarily relying upon facts otherwise available to assign an estimated weighted- average dumping margin to Hyundai in this review because Hyundai withheld necessary information that was requested by Commerce, thereby significantly impeding the conduct of the review. Further, Commerce preliminarily determines that Hyundai failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with requests for information and, thus, Commerce is applying adverse facts available (AFA) to Hyundai, in accordance with section 776(b) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions regarding the application of AFA, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rate for Non-Selected Companies In accordance with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United States,\6\ we are applying to the non-selected companies the rate preliminarily applied to Hyosung in this administrative review.\7\ This is the only rate determined in this review for individual respondents and, thus, should be applied to the three non-selected companies under section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. For a detailed discussion, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). \7\ See, e.g., Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4\1/2\ Inches) from Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 45124, 45124 (July 12, 2016), unchanged in Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4\1/2\ Inches) from Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 80640, 80641 (November 16, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: \8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ As AFA, we preliminarily assign Hyundai a dumping margin of 60.81 percent, an AFA rate used in the previous review. See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 82 FR 13432 (March 13, 2017). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer/exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyosung Corporation......................................... 0.00 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd./Hyundai Electric & Energy 60.81 Systems Co., Ltd........................................... Iljin Electric Co., Ltd..................................... 0.00 Iljin....................................................... 0.00 LSIS Co., Ltd............................................... 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce will disclose to parties to the proceeding any calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of review within five days after the date of publication of this notice.\9\ Commerce will announce the briefing schedule to interested parties at a later date. Interested parties may submit case briefs on the deadline that Commerce will announce.\10\ Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is limited to the issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days from the deadline date for the submission of case briefs.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\12\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\13\ Case and rebuttal briefs must be served on interested parties.\14\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). \13\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303. \14\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\15\ Parties should confirm the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce intends to publish the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after publication of these preliminary results, unless extended.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.213(h). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final results of this review and the respondent reported reliable entered values, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined [[Page 45417]] sales made during the period of review to each importer to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a per-unit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping for the examined sales made during the period of review to that importer by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If the preliminary results are unchanged for the final results, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 60.81 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the period of review which were produced and/or exported by Hyundai. Regarding entries of subject merchandise during the period of review that were produced by Hyosung and Hyundai and for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, as established in the less-than-fair-value investigation of the order, if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\18\ For a full discussion of this matter, see Assessment Policy Notice.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). \19\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and Hyundai and other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted- average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this proceeding.\20\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 31, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Methodology A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis C. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market D. Level of Trade E. Cost of Production F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices G. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison VI. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference A. Application of Facts Available B. Use of Adverse Inference C. Selection and Corroboration of the Adverse Facts Available Rate VII. Discussion of The Issues A. Hyundai-Specific Issues VIII. Rate for Non-Selected Companies IX. Parts X. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-19428 Filed 9-6-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2018 / Notices 45415
organizations’ civil nuclear industry ADRRESSES section. If you are interested during the period of review (POR)
export promotion efforts; and in nominating someone to become a August 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017.
(7) The development of U.S. member of the CINTAC, please provide Interested parties are invited to
Government programs to encourage the following information (2 pages comment on these preliminary results.
producers of civil nuclear products and maximum): DATES: Applicable September 7, 2018.
services to enter new foreign markets, in (1) Name; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
connection with which CINTAC may (2) Title; Joshua DeMoss, Tyler Weinhold, or John
advise on how to gather, disseminate, (3) Work phone, fax, and, email Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI,
and promote awareness of information address; Enforcement and Compliance,
on civil nuclear exports and related (4) Name of entity to be represented International Trade Administration,
trade issues. and address including website address; U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
(5) Short biography of nominee Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
II. Membership
including credentials; DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3362,
CINTAC shall consist of (6) Brief description of the entity and
approximately 40 members appointed (202) 482–1121, or (202) 482–0195,
its business activities, size (number of respectively.
by the Secretary, in accordance with employees and annual sales), and export
applicable Department of Commerce markets served; and, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
guidance and based on their ability to (7) An affirmative statement that the Background
carry out the objectives of the applicant and entity to be represented
Committee. Members shall represent meet all eligibility criteria, specifically Commerce initiated this review on
U.S. entities involved in the export of addressing that the applicant: October 16, 2017.1 We selected two
civil nuclear products and services and (a) Is a U.S. citizen; and mandatory respondents in this review,
reflect the diversity of this sector, (b) Is not required to register as a Hyosung and HHI.2 Commerce
including in terms of entities’ size and foreign agent under the Foreign Agents exercised its discretion to toll all
geographic location. The Committee Registration Act of 1938, as amended. deadlines affected by the closure of the
shall also represent the diversity of Please do not send organization Federal Government from January 20
company or organizational roles in the brochures or any other information. through 22, 2018. The revised deadline
development of civil nuclear energy All applications should be submitted for the preliminary results of this review
projects, including, for example, U.S. in pdf or MS Word format via email to is August 31, 2018.3 For a more detailed
civil nuclear manufacturing and jonathan.chesebro@trade.gov, or via description of the events that followed
services companies, U.S. utilities, U.S. mail to Jonathan Chesebro, Office of the initiation of this review, see the
trade associations, and other U.S. Energy & Environmental Industries, Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
organizations in the U.S. civil nuclear Room 28018, U.S. Department of dated concurrently with these results
sector. The Secretary shall appoint to Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution and hereby adopted by this notice.4
the Committee at least one individual Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. The Preliminary Decision
representing each of the following: Nominees selected for appointment to Memorandum is a public document and
a. Civil nuclear manufacturing and the Committee will be notified by mail. 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
services companies;
b. small businesses; Dated: August 29, 2018. Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
Edward O’Malley, 48051 (October 16, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
c. utilities; 2 In accordance with Commerce’s decision in the
d. trade associations in the civil Director, Office of Energy and Environmental LPTs from Korea changed circumstances review,
nuclear sector; Industries. Commerce has determined that HEES is the
e. research institutions and [FR Doc. 2018–19231 Filed 9–6–18; 8:45 am] successor-in-interest to HHI. See Large Power
universities; and BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Notice of
f. private sector organizations Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, 83 FR 24973 (May 31, 2018)
involved in strengthening the export (LPTs from Korea CCR) (unchanged in Large Power
competitiveness of U.S. civil nuclear DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Notice of
products and services. Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Members shall serve in a International Trade Administration Circumstances Review, signed August 28, 2018;
pending publication).
representative capacity, expressing the [A–580–867] 3 See Memorandum for The Record from
views and interests of a U.S. entity, as Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
well as its particular subsector; they are, Large Power Transformers From the Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non-
therefore, not Special Government Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant
Employees. Each member of the Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
of Antidumping Duty Administrative ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Committee must be a U.S. citizen and Review; 2016–2017 Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum),
must not be registered as a foreign agent dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this
under the Foreign Agents Registration AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, segment of the proceeding have been extended by
Act. No member may represent a U.S. International Trade Administration, 3 days.
4 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy
entity that is majority owned or Department of Commerce.
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
controlled by a foreign government SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the
entity (or foreign government entities). (Commerce) preliminarily determines non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant
The Secretary of Commerce invites that Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
James Maeder, Senior Director, performing the
applications for the CINTAC, consistent (HHI) and Hyundai Electric & Energy duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for
with the above membership Systems Co. (HEES) (collectively, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
requirements. To be considered for Hyundai) made sales of subject entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
membership, submit the following merchandise at less than normal value, Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Large Power Transformers from the
information (2 pages maximum) by 5:00 and that Hyosung Corporation Republic of Korea; 2016–2017’’ (Preliminary
p.m. EDT on September 28, 2018 to the (Hyosung) did not make sales of subject Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with
email or mailing address listed in the merchandise at less than normal value, this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Sep 06, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_45589/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2018 / Notices 45417
sales made during the period of review publication of the final results of this IV. Scope of the Order
to each importer to the total entered administrative review for all shipments V. Discussion of the Methodology
value of those same sales in accordance of the subject merchandise entered, or A. Determination of Comparison Method
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the withdrawn from warehouse, for B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
respondent has not reported reliable consumption on or after the publication C. Home Market Viability as Comparison
entered values, we will calculate a per- date of the final results of this Market
unit assessment rate for each importer administrative review, as provided by D. Level of Trade
by dividing the total amount of section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The E. Cost of Production
dumping for the examined sales made cash deposit rate for Hyosung and F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
during the period of review to that Hyundai and other companies listed Comparison Market Prices
importer by the total sales quantity above will be equal to the weighted- G. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
associated with those transactions. average dumping margin established in VI. Application of Facts Available and Use of
Where an importer-specific ad valorem the final results of this administrative Adverse Inference
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, review; (2) for previously reviewed or A. Application of Facts Available
B. Use of Adverse Inference
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the investigated companies not listed above, C. Selection and Corroboration of the
appropriate entries without regard to the cash deposit rate will continue to be Adverse Facts Available Rate
antidumping duties in accordance with the company-specific rate published for VII. Discussion of The Issues
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If the the most recently completed segment of A. Hyundai-Specific Issues
respondent’s weighted-average dumping this proceeding in which they were VIII. Rate for Non-Selected Companies
margin is zero or de minimis in the final reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm IX. Parts
results of review, we will instruct CBP covered in this review, a prior review, X. Recommendation
not to assess duties on any of its entries or in the investigation but the producer [FR Doc. 2018–19428 Filed 9–6–18; 8:45 am]
in accordance with the Final is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Modification for Reviews, i.e., ‘‘{w}here established for the most recently
the weighted-average margin of completed segment of this proceeding
dumping for the exporter is determined for the producer of the merchandise; DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
to be zero or de minimis, no and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 17 producers or exporters will continue to International Trade Administration
If the preliminary results are be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent,
unchanged for the final results, we will the rate established in the investigation [A–570–010]
instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem of this proceeding.20 These cash deposit
assessment rate of 60.81 percent to all requirements, when imposed, shall Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
entries of subject merchandise during remain in effect until further notice. Products From the People’s Republic
the period of review which were of China: Notice of Partial Rescission
Notification to Importers
produced and/or exported by Hyundai. of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Regarding entries of subject This notice also serves as a reminder Review; 2017–2018
merchandise during the period of to importers of their responsibility
review that were produced by Hyosung under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
and Hyundai and for which they did not certificate regarding the reimbursement International Trade Administration,
know that the merchandise was of antidumping duties prior to Department of Commerce.
destined for the United States, we will liquidation of the relevant entries SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed during this review period. Failure to (Commerce) is rescinding, in part, the
entries at the all-others rate of 22.00 comply with this requirement could administrative review of the
percent, as established in the less-than- result in Commerce’s presumption that antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
fair-value investigation of the order, if reimbursement of antidumping duties crystalline silicon photovoltaic products
there is no rate for the intermediate occurred and the subsequent assessment from the People’s Republic of China
company(ies) involved in the of double antidumping duties. (China) for the period of review (POR),
transaction.18 For a full discussion of Notification to Interested Parties February 1, 2017, through January 31,
this matter, see Assessment Policy 2018.
Notice.19 We are issuing and publishing this
We intend to issue liquidation notice in accordance with sections DATES: Applicable September 7, 2018.
instructions to CBP 15 days after 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
publication of the final results of this Dated: August 31, 2018. Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office
review. Gary Taverman, IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
Cash Deposit Requirements Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping International Trade Administration,
and Countervailing Duty Operations, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
The following cash deposit performing the non-exclusive functions and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
requirements will be effective upon duties of the Assistant Secretary for DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–2769.
Enforcement and Compliance.
17 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Background
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
I. Summary On February 1, 2018, Commerce
Reviews). II. Background published in the Federal Register, a
18 See Large Power Transformers from the III. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales notice of opportunity to request an
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR and Cost Information administrative review of the AD order
53177 (August 31, 2012). on certain crystalline silicon
19 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 20 See Large Power Transformers from the
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR
photovoltaic products from China (the
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 53177 (August 31, 2012). Order) covering the period February 1,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Sep 06, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_45589/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-09-07 00:15:13
Document Modified: 2018-09-07 00:15:13
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable September 7, 2018. | |
| Contact | Joshua DeMoss, Tyler Weinhold, or John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3362, (202) 482-1121, or (202) 482-0195, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 45415 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR