83 FR 46408 - National Priorities List
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 178 (September 13, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 178 (September 13, 2018)
| Page Range | 46408-46413 | |
| FR Document | 2018-19878 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 46408-46413] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-19878] [[Page 46408]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 300 [EPA-HQ-SFUND-2015-0575, EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0605, 0608 and 0610, EPA-HQ- OLEM-2018-0252 and 0254; FRL-9983-69-OLEM] National Priorities List AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (``CERCLA'' or ``the Act''), as amended, requires that the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (``NCP'') include a list of national priorities among the known releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants throughout the United States. The National Priorities List (``NPL'') constitutes this list. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the Environmental Protection Agency (``the EPA'' or ``the agency'') in determining which sites warrant further investigation. These further investigations will allow the EPA to assess the nature and extent of public health and environmental risks associated with the site and to determine what CERCLA-financed remedial action(s), if any, may be appropriate. This rule adds five sites to the General Superfund section of the NPL, clarifies a site name, and withdraws a previous addition to the NPL. DATES: The document is effective on October 15, 2018. ADDRESSES: Contact information for the EPA Headquarters:Docket Coordinator, Headquarters; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; CERCLA Docket Office; 1301 Constitution Avenue NW; William Jefferson Clinton Building West, Room 3334, Washington, DC 20004, 202/566-0276. The contact information for the regional dockets is as follows: Holly Inglis, Region 1 (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT), U.S. EPA, Superfund Records and Information Center, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109-3912; 617/918-1413. Ildefonso Acosta, Region 2 (NJ, NY, PR, VI), U.S. EPA, 290 Broadway, New York, NY 10007-1866; 212/637-4344. Lorie Baker (ASRC), Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), U.S. EPA, Library, 1650 Arch Street, Mailcode 3HS12, Philadelphia, PA 19103; 215/814-3355. Cathy Amoroso, Region 4 (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN), U.S. EPA, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Mailcode 9T25, Atlanta, GA 30303; 404/ 562-8637. Todd Quesada, Region 5 (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI), U.S. EPA Superfund Division Librarian/SFD Records Manager SRC-7J, Metcalfe Federal Building, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604; 312/ 886-4465. Brenda Cook, Region 6 (AR, LA, NM, OK, TX), U.S. EPA, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Mailcode 6SFTS, Dallas, TX 75202-2733; 214/ 665-7436. Kumud Pyakuryal, Region 7 (IA, KS, MO, NE), U.S. EPA, 11201 Renner Blvd., Mailcode SUPRSTAR, Lenexa, KS 66219; 913/551-7956. Victor Ketellapper, Region 8 (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY), U.S. EPA, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Mailcode 8EPR-B, Denver, CO 80202-1129; 303/312-6578. Sharon Bowen, Region 9 (AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU, MP), U.S. EPA, 75 Hawthorne Street, Mailcode SFD 6-1, San Francisco, CA 94105; 415/947-4250. Ken Marcy, Region 10 (AK, ID, OR, WA), U.S. EPA, 1200 6th Avenue, Mailcode ECL-112, Seattle, WA 98101; 206/463-1349. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Jeng, phone: (703) 603-8852, email: [email protected], Site Assessment and Remedy Decisions Branch, Assessment and Remediation Division, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (Mailcode 5204P), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; or the Superfund Hotline, phone (800) 424-9346 or (703) 412-9810 in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Background A. What are CERCLA and SARA? B. What is the NCP? C. What is the National Priorities List (NPL)? D. How are sites listed on the NPL? E. What happens to sites on the NPL? F. Does the NPL define the boundaries of sites? G. How are sites removed from the NPL? H. May the EPA delete portions of sites from the NPL as they are cleaned up? I. What is the Construction Completion List (CCL)? J. What is the Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use measure? K. What is state/tribal correspondence concerning NPL Listing? II. Availability of Information to the Public A. May I review the documents relevant to this final rule? B. What documents are available for review at the EPA Headquarters docket? C. What documents are available for review at the EPA regional dockets? D. How do I access the documents? E. How may I obtain a current list of NPL sites? III. Contents of This Final Rule A. Additions to the NPL B. What did the EPA do with the public comments it received? C. Site Name Clarification D. Vacatur of Previous NPL Listing IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations L. Congressional Review Act I. Background A. What are CERCLA and SARA? In 1980, Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675 (``CERCLA'' or ``the Act''), in response to the dangers of uncontrolled releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, and releases or substantial threats of releases into the environment of any pollutant or contaminant that may present an imminent or substantial danger to the public health or welfare. CERCLA was amended on October 17, 1986, by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (``SARA''), Public Law 99-499, 100 Stat. 1613 et seq. B. What is the NCP? To implement CERCLA, the EPA promulgated the revised National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (``NCP''), 40 CFR part 300, on July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180), pursuant to CERCLA section 105 and Executive Order 12316 (46 FR 42237, August 20, 1981). The NCP sets guidelines and procedures for responding to releases and threatened [[Page 46409]] releases of hazardous substances, or releases or substantial threats of releases into the environment of any pollutant or contaminant that may present an imminent or substantial danger to the public health or welfare. The EPA has revised the NCP on several occasions. The most recent comprehensive revision was on March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666). As required under section 105(a)(8)(A) of CERCLA, the NCP also includes ``criteria for determining priorities among releases or threatened releases throughout the United States for the purpose of taking remedial action and, to the extent practicable, taking into account the potential urgency of such action, for the purpose of taking removal action.'' ``Removal'' actions are defined broadly and include a wide range of actions taken to study, clean up, prevent or otherwise address releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants (42 U.S.C. 9601(23)). C. What is the National Priorities List (NPL)? The NPL is a list of national priorities among the known or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants throughout the United States. The list, which is appendix B of the NCP (40 CFR part 300), was required under section 105(a)(8)(B) of CERCLA, as amended. Section 105(a)(8)(B) defines the NPL as a list of ``releases'' and the highest priority ``facilities'' and requires that the NPL be revised at least annually. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation to assess the nature and extent of public health and environmental risks associated with a release of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants. The NPL is of only limited significance, however, as it does not assign liability to any party or to the owner of any specific property. Also, placing a site on the NPL does not mean that any remedial or removal action necessarily need be taken. For purposes of listing, the NPL includes two sections, one of sites that are generally evaluated and cleaned up by the EPA (the ``General Superfund section'') and one of sites that are owned or operated by other federal agencies (the ``Federal Facilities section''). With respect to sites in the Federal Facilities section, these sites are generally being addressed by other federal agencies. Under Executive Order 12580 (52 FR 2923, January 29, 1987) and CERCLA section 120, each federal agency is responsible for carrying out most response actions at facilities under its own jurisdiction, custody or control, although the EPA is responsible for preparing a Hazard Ranking System (``HRS'') score and determining whether the facility is placed on the NPL. D. How are sites listed on the NPL? There are three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL for possible remedial action (see 40 CFR 300.425(c) of the NCP): (1) A site may be included on the NPL if it scores sufficiently high on the HRS, which the EPA promulgated as appendix A of the NCP (40 CFR part 300). The HRS serves as a screening tool to evaluate the relative potential of uncontrolled hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants to pose a threat to human health or the environment. On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), the EPA promulgated revisions to the HRS partly in response to CERCLA section 105(c), added by SARA. On January 9, 2017 (82 FR 2760), a subsurface intrusion component was added to the HRS to enable the EPA to consider human exposure to hazardous substances or pollutants and contaminants that enter regularly occupied structures through subsurface intrusion when evaluating sites for the NPL. The current HRS evaluates four pathways: Ground water, surface water, soil exposure and subsurface intrusion, and air. As a matter of agency policy, those sites that score 28.50 or greater on the HRS are eligible for the NPL. (2) Each state may designate a single site as its top priority to be listed on the NPL, without any HRS score. This provision of CERCLA requires that, to the extent practicable, the NPL include one facility designated by each state as the greatest danger to public health, welfare or the environment among known facilities in the state. This mechanism for listing is set out in the NCP at 40 CFR 300.425(c)(2). (3) The third mechanism for listing, included in the NCP at 40 CFR 300.425(c)(3), allows certain sites to be listed without any HRS score, if all of the following conditions are met: The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S. Public Health Service has issued a health advisory that recommends dissociation of individuals from the release. The EPA determines that the release poses a significant threat to public health. The EPA anticipates that it will be more cost-effective to use its remedial authority than to use its removal authority to respond to the release. The EPA promulgated an original NPL of 406 sites on September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) and generally has updated it at least annually. E. What happens to sites on the NPL? A site may undergo remedial action financed by the Trust Fund established under CERCLA (commonly referred to as the ``Superfund'') only after it is placed on the NPL, as provided in the NCP at 40 CFR 300.425(b)(1). (``Remedial actions'' are those ``consistent with a permanent remedy, taken instead of or in addition to removal actions'' (40 CFR 300.5).) However, under 40 CFR 300.425(b)(2), placing a site on the NPL ``does not imply that monies will be expended.'' The EPA may pursue other appropriate authorities to respond to the releases, including enforcement action under CERCLA and other laws. F. Does the NPL define the boundaries of sites? The NPL does not describe releases in precise geographical terms; it would be neither feasible nor consistent with the limited purpose of the NPL (to identify releases that are priorities for further evaluation), for it to do so. Indeed, the precise nature and extent of the site are typically not known at the time of listing. Although a CERCLA ``facility'' is broadly defined to include any area where a hazardous substance has ``come to be located'' (CERCLA section 101(9)), the listing process itself is not intended to define or reflect the boundaries of such facilities or releases. Of course, HRS data (if the HRS is used to list a site) upon which the NPL placement was based will, to some extent, describe the release(s) at issue. That is, the NPL site would include all releases evaluated as part of that HRS analysis. When a site is listed, the approach generally used to describe the relevant release(s) is to delineate a geographical area (usually the area within an installation or plant boundaries) and identify the site by reference to that area. However, the NPL site is not necessarily coextensive with the boundaries of the installation or plant, and the boundaries of the installation or plant are not necessarily the ``boundaries'' of the site. Rather, the site consists of all contaminated areas within the area used to identify the site, as well as any other location where that contamination has come to be located, or from where that contamination came. In other words, while geographic terms are often used to designate the site (e.g., the ``Jones Co. Plant site'') in terms of the property owned by a particular party, the site, properly understood, is not limited to that property (e.g., it may extend beyond the property due to contaminant migration), and conversely [[Page 46410]] may not occupy the full extent of the property (e.g., where there are uncontaminated parts of the identified property, they may not be, strictly speaking, part of the ``site''). The ``site'' is thus neither equal to, nor confined by, the boundaries of any specific property that may give the site its name, and the name itself should not be read to imply that this site is coextensive with the entire area within the property boundary of the installation or plant. In addition, the site name is merely used to help identify the geographic location of the contamination, and is not meant to constitute any determination of liability at a site. For example, the name ``Jones Co. plant site,'' does not imply that the Jones Company is responsible for the contamination located on the plant site. EPA regulations provide that the remedial investigation (``RI'') ``is a process undertaken . . . to determine the nature and extent of the problem presented by the release'' as more information is developed on site contamination, and which is generally performed in an interactive fashion with the feasibility study (``FS'') (40 CFR 300.5). During the RI/FS process, the release may be found to be larger or smaller than was originally thought, as more is learned about the source(s) and the migration of the contamination. However, the HRS inquiry focuses on an evaluation of the threat posed and therefore the boundaries of the release need not be exactly defined. Moreover, it generally is impossible to discover the full extent of where the contamination ``has come to be located'' before all necessary studies and remedial work are completed at a site. Indeed, the known boundaries of the contamination can be expected to change over time. Thus, in most cases, it may be impossible to describe the boundaries of a release with absolute certainty. Further, as noted previously, NPL listing does not assign liability to any party or to the owner of any specific property. Thus, if a party does not believe it is liable for releases on discrete parcels of property, it can submit supporting information to the agency at any time after it receives notice it is a potentially responsible party. For these reasons, the NPL need not be amended as further research reveals more information about the location of the contamination or release. G. How are sites removed from the NPL? The EPA may delete sites from the NPL where no further response is appropriate under Superfund, as explained in the NCP at 40 CFR 300.425(e). This section also provides that the EPA shall consult with states on proposed deletions and shall consider whether any of the following criteria have been met: (i) Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all appropriate response actions required; (ii) All appropriate Superfund-financed response has been implemented and no further response action is required; or (iii) The remedial investigation has shown the release poses no significant threat to public health or the environment, and taking of remedial measures is not appropriate. H. May the EPA delete portions of sites from the NPL as they are cleaned up? In November 1995, the EPA initiated a policy to delete portions of NPL sites where cleanup is complete (60 FR 55465, November 1, 1995). Total site cleanup may take many years, while portions of the site may have been cleaned up and made available for productive use. I. What is the Construction Completion List (CCL)? The EPA also has developed an NPL construction completion list (``CCL'') to simplify its system of categorizing sites and to better communicate the successful completion of cleanup activities (58 FR 12142, March 2, 1993). Inclusion of a site on the CCL has no legal significance. Sites qualify for the CCL when: (1) Any necessary physical construction is complete, whether or not final cleanup levels or other requirements have been achieved; (2) the EPA has determined that the response action should be limited to measures that do not involve construction (e.g., institutional controls); or (3) the site qualifies for deletion from the NPL. For more information on the CCL, see the EPA's internet site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/construction-completions-national-priorities-list-npl-sites-number. J. What is the Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use measure? The Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use measure represents important Superfund accomplishments and the measure reflects the high priority the EPA places on considering anticipated future land use as part of the remedy selection process. See Guidance for Implementing the Sitewide Ready-for-Reuse Measure, May 24, 2006, OSWER 9365.0-36. This measure applies to final and deleted sites where construction is complete, all cleanup goals have been achieved, and all institutional or other controls are in place. The EPA has been successful on many occasions in carrying out remedial actions that ensure protectiveness of human health and the environment for current and future land uses, in a manner that allows contaminated properties to be restored to environmental and economic vitality. For further information, please go to https://www.epa.gov/superfund/about-superfund-cleanup-process#tab-9. K. What is state/tribal correspondence concerning NPL listing? In order to maintain close coordination with states and tribes in the NPL listing decision process, the EPA's policy is to determine the position of the states and tribes regarding sites that the EPA is considering for listing. This consultation process is outlined in two memoranda that can be found at the following website: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/statetribal-correspondence-concerning-npl-site-listing. The EPA has improved the transparency of the process by which state and tribal input is solicited. The EPA is using the Web and where appropriate more structured state and tribal correspondence that (1) explains the concerns at the site and the EPA's rationale for proceeding; (2) requests an explanation of how the state intends to address the site if placement on the NPL is not favored; and (3) emphasizes the transparent nature of the process by informing states that information on their responses will be publicly available. A model letter and correspondence between the EPA and states and tribes where applicable, is available on the EPA's website at http://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/HQ/174024. II. Availability of Information to the Public A. May I review the documents relevant to this final rule? Yes, documents relating to the evaluation and scoring of the sites in this final rule are contained in dockets located both at the EPA headquarters and in the EPA regional offices. An electronic version of the public docket is available through https://www.regulations.gov (see table below for docket identification numbers). Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facilities identified in section II.D. [[Page 46411]] Docket Identification Numbers by Site ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Site name City/county, state Docket ID No. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Broadway Street Corridor Groundwater Anderson, IN........... EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0605 Contamination. Rockwell International Wheel & Trim... Grenada, MS............ EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0608 Donnelsville Contaminated Aquifer..... Donnelsville, OH....... EPA-HQ-OLEM-2018-0252 Southside Chattanooga Lead............ Chattanooga, TN........ EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0610 Delfasco Forge........................ Grand Prairie, TX...... EPA-HQ-OLEM-2018-0254 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. What documents are available for review at the EPA Headquarters docket? The headquarters docket for this rule contains the HRS score sheets, the documentation record describing the information used to compute the score and a list of documents referenced in the documentation record for each site. C. What documents are available for review at the EPA regional dockets? The EPA regional dockets contain all the information in the headquarters docket, plus the actual reference documents containing the data principally relied upon by the EPA in calculating or evaluating the HRS score. These reference documents are available only in the regional dockets. D. How do I access the documents? You may view the documents, by appointment only, after the publication of this rule. The hours of operation for the headquarters docket are from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding federal holidays. Please contact the regional dockets for hours. For addresses for the headquarters and regional dockets, see ADDRESSES section in the beginning portion of this preamble. E. How may I obtain a current list of NPL sites? You may obtain a current list of NPL sites via the internet at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/national-priorities-list-npl-sites-site-name or by contacting the Superfund docket (see contact information in the beginning portion of this document). III. Contents of This Final Rule A. Additions to the NPL This final rule adds the following five sites to the General Superfund section of the NPL. These sites are being added to the NPL based on HRS score. General Superfund section: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Site name City/county ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IN...................................... Broadway Street Corridor Groundwater Anderson. Contamination. MS...................................... Rockwell International Wheel & Trim....... Grenada. OH...................................... Donnelsville Contaminated Aquifer......... Donnelsville. TN...................................... Southside Chattanooga Lead................ Chattanooga. TX...................................... Delfasco Forge............................ Grand Prairie. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. What did the EPA do with the public comments it received? The EPA reviewed all comments received on the sites in this rule and responded to all relevant comments. The EPA is adding five sites to the NPL in this final rule. Three sites were proposed for NPL addition on January 18, 2018 (83 FR 2576). The sites are: Broadway Street Corridor Groundwater Contamination in Anderson, IN; Rockwell International Wheel & Trim in Grenada, MS; and Southside Chattanooga Lead in Chattanooga, TN. Two sites were proposed for NPL addition on May 17, 2018 (83 FR 22918). Those sites are: Donnelsville Contaminated Aquifer in Donnelsville, OH; and Delfasco Forge in Grand Prairie, TX. Comments on Rockwell International Wheel & Trim, Southside Chattanooga Lead and Broadway Street Corridor Groundwater Contamination are being addressed in response to comment support documents available in the public docket concurrently with this rule. To view public comments on these sites, as well as EPA's response, please refer to the support documents filed in connection with this rule. The EPA received no comments on the Delfasco Forge site. For the Donnelsville Contaminated Aquifer site, the EPA received one comment from community members in support of NPL listing and one comment unrelated to NPL listing. C. Site Name Clarification On January 18, 2018 (83 FR 2576) the EPA proposed to add the ``Southside Chattanooga Lead Site'' site to the NPL. The EPA is dropping ``Site'' from the site name and henceforth referring to it as Southside Chattanooga Lead. D. Vacatur of Previous NPL Listing EPA placed the West Vermont Drinking Water Contamination site located in Indianapolis, Indiana on the NPL on September 9, 2016 (81 FR 62397). On May 18, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the 2016 rule which placed the site on the NPL (Genuine Parts Co. v. EPA, No. 16-1416 (DC Cir. 2018)). Consequently, EPA has withdrawn the West Vermont Drinking Water Contamination site from the NPL. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders. A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is not a significant regulatory action and was therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866. C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA. This rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require approval of the OMB. [[Page 46412]] D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This rule listing sites on the NPL does not impose any obligations on any group, including small entities. This rule also does not establish standards or requirements that any small entity must meet, and imposes no direct costs on any small entity. Whether an entity, small or otherwise, is liable for response costs for a release of hazardous substances depends on whether that entity is liable under CERCLA 107(a). Any such liability exists regardless of whether the site is listed on the NPL through this rulemaking. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. Listing a site on the NPL does not itself impose any costs. Listing does not mean that the EPA necessarily will undertake remedial action. Nor does listing require any action by a private party, state, local or tribal governments or determine liability for response costs. Costs that arise out of site responses result from future site-specific decisions regarding what actions to take, not directly from the act of placing a site on the NPL. F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications as specified in Executive Order 13175. Listing a site on the NPL does not impose any costs on a tribe or require a tribe to take remedial action. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because this action itself is procedural in nature (adds sites to a list) and does not, in and of itself, provide protection from environmental health and safety risks. Separate future regulatory actions are required for mitigation of environmental health and safety risks. I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income or indigenous populations because it does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. As discussed in Section I.C. of the preamble to this action, the NPL is a list of national priorities. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation to assess the nature and extent of public health and environmental risks associated with a release of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants. The NPL is of only limited significance as it does not assign liability to any party. Also, placing a site on the NPL does not mean that any remedial or removal action necessarily need be taken. L. Congressional Review Act This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Provisions of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) or section 305 of CERCLA may alter the effective date of this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 801(b)(1), a rule shall not take effect, or continue in effect, if Congress enacts (and the President signs) a joint resolution of disapproval, described under section 802. Another statutory provision that may affect this rule is CERCLA section 305, which provides for a legislative veto of regulations promulgated under CERCLA. Although INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919,103 S. Ct. 2764 (1983), and Bd. of Regents of the University of Washington v. EPA, 86 F.3d 1214,1222 (D.C. Cir. 1996), cast the validity of the legislative veto into question, the EPA has transmitted a copy of this regulation to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives. If action by Congress under either the CRA or CERCLA section 305 calls the effective date of this regulation into question, the EPA will publish a document of clarification in the Federal Register. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations, Natural resources, Oil pollution, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water pollution control, Water supply. Dated: September 6, 2018. Barry N. Breen, Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Land and Emergency Management. 40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows: PART 300--NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN 0 1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193. 0 2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300 is amended as follows: 0 a. Under Indiana: 0 i. By adding the entry ``Broadway Street Corridor Groundwater Contamination'' in alphabetical order. 0 ii. By removing the entry ``West Vermont Drinking Water''. 0 b. By adding the entries for ``Rockwell International Wheel & Trim'', ``Donnelsville Contaminated Aquifer'', ``Southside Chattanooga Lead'', and ``Delfasco Forge'' in alphabetical order by state. The additions read as follows: Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List [[Page 46413]] Table 1--General Superfund Section ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Site name City/county Notes (a) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * IN................................ Broadway Street Corridor Anderson............. ......................... Groundwater Contamination. * * * * * * * MS................................ Rockwell International Grenada.............. ......................... Wheel & Trim. * * * * * * * OH................................ Donnelsville Contaminated Donnelsville......... ......................... Aquifer. * * * * * * * TN................................ Southside Chattanooga Lead Chattanooga.......... ......................... * * * * * * * TX................................ Delfasco Forge............ Grand Prairie........ ......................... * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \(a)\ A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored, HRS score need not be greater than or equal to 28.50). * * * * * [FR Doc. 2018-19878 Filed 9-12-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![46408 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 3HS12, Philadelphia, PA 19103; 215/ B. What documents are available for review
AGENCY 814–3355. at the EPA Headquarters docket?
• Cathy Amoroso, Region 4 (AL, FL, C. What documents are available for review
40 CFR Part 300 GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN), U.S. EPA, 61 at the EPA regional dockets?
D. How do I access the documents?
Forsyth Street SW, Mailcode 9T25, E. How may I obtain a current list of NPL
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2015–0575, EPA–HQ– Atlanta, GA 30303; 404/562–8637.
OLEM–2017–0605, 0608 and 0610, EPA–HQ– sites?
• Todd Quesada, Region 5 (IL, IN, MI, III. Contents of This Final Rule
OLEM–2018–0252 and 0254; FRL–9983–69–
OLEM]
MN, OH, WI), U.S. EPA Superfund A. Additions to the NPL
Division Librarian/SFD Records B. What did the EPA do with the public
National Priorities List Manager SRC–7J, Metcalfe Federal comments it received?
Building, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, C. Site Name Clarification
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Chicago, IL 60604; 312/886–4465. D. Vacatur of Previous NPL Listing
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Agency (EPA). • Brenda Cook, Region 6 (AR, LA,
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
ACTION: Final rule. NM, OK, TX), U.S. EPA, 1445 Ross Planning and Review and Executive
Avenue, Suite 1200, Mailcode 6SFTS, Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
SUMMARY: The Comprehensive Dallas, TX 75202–2733; 214/665–7436. Regulatory Review
Environmental Response, • Kumud Pyakuryal, Region 7 (IA, B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 KS, MO, NE), U.S. EPA, 11201 Renner Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
(‘‘CERCLA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’), as amended, Blvd., Mailcode SUPRSTAR, Lenexa, KS Costs
requires that the National Oil and 66219; 913/551–7956. C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
Hazardous Substances Pollution • Victor Ketellapper, Region 8 (CO, D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Contingency Plan (‘‘NCP’’) include a list MT, ND, SD, UT, WY), U.S. EPA, 1595 (UMRA)
of national priorities among the known Wynkoop Street, Mailcode 8EPR–B, F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
releases or threatened releases of Denver, CO 80202–1129; 303/312–6578. G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
hazardous substances, pollutants or • Sharon Bowen, Region 9 (AZ, CA, and Coordination With Indian Tribal
contaminants throughout the United HI, NV, AS, GU, MP), U.S. EPA, 75 Governments
States. The National Priorities List Hawthorne Street, Mailcode SFD 6–1, H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
(‘‘NPL’’) constitutes this list. The NPL is San Francisco, CA 94105; 415/947– Children From Environmental Health
4250. and Safety Risks
intended primarily to guide the
• Ken Marcy, Region 10 (AK, ID, OR, I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘the Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
EPA’’ or ‘‘the agency’’) in determining WA), U.S. EPA, 1200 6th Avenue, Distribution, or Use
which sites warrant further Mailcode ECL–112, Seattle, WA 98101; J. National Technology Transfer and
investigation. These further 206/463–1349. Advancement Act (NTTAA)
investigations will allow the EPA to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
assess the nature and extent of public Terry Jeng, phone: (703) 603–8852, To Address Environmental Justice in
health and environmental risks email: jeng.terry@epa.gov, Site Minority Populations and Low-Income
Assessment and Remedy Decisions Populations
associated with the site and to
L. Congressional Review Act
determine what CERCLA-financed Branch, Assessment and Remediation
remedial action(s), if any, may be Division, Office of Superfund I. Background
appropriate. This rule adds five sites to Remediation and Technology
A. What are CERCLA and SARA?
the General Superfund section of the Innovation (Mailcode 5204P), U.S.
NPL, clarifies a site name, and Environmental Protection Agency; 1200 In 1980, Congress enacted the
withdraws a previous addition to the Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, Comprehensive Environmental
NPL. DC 20460; or the Superfund Hotline, Response, Compensation, and Liability
phone (800) 424–9346 or (703) 412– Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675 (‘‘CERCLA’’ or
DATES: The document is effective on
9810 in the Washington, DC, ‘‘the Act’’), in response to the dangers of
October 15, 2018. uncontrolled releases or threatened
metropolitan area.
ADDRESSES: Contact information for the releases of hazardous substances, and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
EPA Headquarters: releases or substantial threats of releases
• Docket Coordinator, Headquarters; Table of Contents into the environment of any pollutant or
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; I. Background contaminant that may present an
CERCLA Docket Office; 1301 A. What are CERCLA and SARA? imminent or substantial danger to the
Constitution Avenue NW; William B. What is the NCP? public health or welfare. CERCLA was
Jefferson Clinton Building West, Room C. What is the National Priorities List amended on October 17, 1986, by the
3334, Washington, DC 20004, 202/566– (NPL)? Superfund Amendments and
0276. D. How are sites listed on the NPL?
E. What happens to sites on the NPL?
Reauthorization Act (‘‘SARA’’), Public
The contact information for the Law 99–499, 100 Stat. 1613 et seq.
F. Does the NPL define the boundaries of
regional dockets is as follows: sites?
• Holly Inglis, Region 1 (CT, ME, MA, B. What is the NCP?
G. How are sites removed from the NPL?
NH, RI, VT), U.S. EPA, Superfund H. May the EPA delete portions of sites To implement CERCLA, the EPA
Records and Information Center, 5 Post from the NPL as they are cleaned up? promulgated the revised National Oil
Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA I. What is the Construction Completion List and Hazardous Substances Pollution
02109–3912; 617/918–1413. (CCL)? Contingency Plan (‘‘NCP’’), 40 CFR part
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
• Ildefonso Acosta, Region 2 (NJ, NY, J. What is the Sitewide Ready for 300, on July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180),
Anticipated Use measure?
PR, VI), U.S. EPA, 290 Broadway, New K. What is state/tribal correspondence
pursuant to CERCLA section 105 and
York, NY 10007–1866; 212/637–4344. concerning NPL Listing? Executive Order 12316 (46 FR 42237,
• Lorie Baker (ASRC), Region 3 (DE, II. Availability of Information to the Public August 20, 1981). The NCP sets
DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), U.S. EPA, A. May I review the documents relevant to guidelines and procedures for
Library, 1650 Arch Street, Mailcode this final rule? responding to releases and threatened
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:40 Sep 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM 13SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_46586/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 46413
TABLE 1—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
State Site name City/county Notes (a)
* * * * * * *
IN ..................................... Broadway Street Corridor Groundwater Contamination .............. Anderson ..................................
* * * * * * *
MS ................................... Rockwell International Wheel & Trim .......................................... Grenada ....................................
* * * * * * *
OH ................................... Donnelsville Contaminated Aquifer ............................................. Donnelsville ..............................
* * * * * * *
TN .................................... Southside Chattanooga Lead ...................................................... Chattanooga .............................
* * * * * * *
TX .................................... Delfasco Forge ............................................................................ Grand Prairie ............................
* * * * * * *
(a) A
= Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored, HRS score need not be greater
than or equal to 28.50).
* * * * * at 202–219–2349, or by email at remove any policy superseded by
[FR Doc. 2018–19878 Filed 9–12–18; 8:45 am] travelpolicy@gsa.gov. Please cite Notice changes in the Federal Acquisition
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
of FTR Bulletin 18–08. Regulation (FAR), to remove procedural
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal guidance internal to VA into the VA
civilian employees of an agency as Acquisition Manual (VAAM), and to
GENERAL SERVICES defined in FTR § 301–1.1, if authorized incorporate any new agency specific
to travel via business-class air regulations or policies. These changes
ADMINISTRATION
accommodations, must use the seek to streamline and align the VAAR
41 CFR Part 301–1 business-class city-pair fare (coded as with the FAR and remove outdated and
‘‘—CB’’) where awarded for the route(s) duplicative requirements and reduce
[Notice–MA–2018–08; Docket No. 2018– burden on contractors. The VAAM
0002, Sequence No. 20]
listed on the travel authorization. The
Federal traveler must use this fare or incorporates portions of the removed
have an authorized exception to VAAR as well as other internal agency
Federal Travel Regulation: Contract
mandatory use of a contract city-pair acquisition policy. VA will rewrite
City-Pair Business-Class Air
fare per the FTR. The information certain parts of the VAAR and VAAM,
Accommodations
outlined in FTR Bulletin 18–08 will and as VAAR parts are rewritten, we
AGENCY: Office of Government-wide provide clarity and promote consistency will publish them in the Federal
Policy (OGP), General Services across the Government. This bulletin is Register. In particular, this rulemaking
Administration (GSA). located at www.gsa.gov/ftr under the revises VAAR concerning Contract Cost
ACTION: Notification of Federal Travel ‘‘FTR & Related Files’’ tab. Principles and Procedures and Protests,
Regulation (FTR) Bulletin 18–08, Disputes and Appeals.
Dated: September 6, 2018.
Contract City-Pair Business-Class Air DATES: This rule is effective on October
Jessica Salmoiraghi,
Accommodations. 15, 2018.
Associate Administrator, Office of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
SUMMARY: GSA is notifying agencies that Government-wide Policy.
Rafael N. Taylor, Senior Procurement
Federal civilian employees of an agency [FR Doc. 2018–19884 Filed 9–12–18; 8:45 am]
Analyst, Procurement Policy and
as defined in its regulations, if BILLING CODE 6820–14–P
Warrant Management Services, 003A2A,
authorized to travel via business-class 425 I Street NW, Washington, DC 20001,
air accommodations, must use the (202) 382–2787. This is not a toll-free
business-class city-pair fare (coded as DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS telephone number.
‘‘—CB’’) where awarded for the route(s) AFFAIRS SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
listed on the travel authorization. The 6, 2018, VA published a proposed rule
information outlined in an FTR bulletin 48 CFR Parts 831, 833, 852 and 871
in the Federal Register (83 FR 14826),
will provide clarity and promote RIN 2900–AQ02 which announced VA‘s intent to amend
consistency across the Government. regulations for VAAR Case RIN 2900–
DATES: FTR Bulletin 18–08 is available VA Acquisition Regulation: Contract AQ02 (Parts 831 and 833). In particular,
September 13, 2018. Cost Principles and Procedures; this final rule revises VAAR part 831 to
ADDRESSES: The bulletin is located at Protests, Disputes and Appeals clarify the cost principles under the
www.gsa.gov/ftr under the ‘‘FTR & chapter 31 program and to apply those
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
Related Files’’ tab. principles to both fixed-price and cost
ACTION: Final rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For reimbursement contracts with
clarification of content, please contact SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans educational institutions, as well as those
Mr. Cy Greenidge, Office of Affairs (VA) is amending and updating with commercial and non-profit
Government-wide Policy, Office of its VA Acquisition Regulation (VAAR) organizations. It revises VAAR part 833
Asset and Transportation Management, in phased increments to revise or to update information for where an
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:40 Sep 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM 13SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_46586/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2018-09-13 01:02:22
Document Modified: 2018-09-13 01:02:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | The document is effective on October 15, 2018. | |
| Contact | Terry Jeng, phone: (703) 603-8852, email: [email protected], Site Assessment and Remedy Decisions Branch, Assessment and Remediation Division, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (Mailcode 5204P), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; or the Superfund Hotline, phone (800) 424-9346 or (703) 412-9810 in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 46408 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Chemicals; Hazardous Substances; Hazardous Waste; Intergovernmental Relations; Natural Resources; Oil Pollution; Penalties; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Superfund; Water Pollution Control and Water Supply |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR