83 FR 46987 - Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 180 (September 17, 2018)

Page Range		46987-46989
FR Document		2018-20180
The Small Business Administration (SBA) is publishing this notice to comply with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), which requires agencies to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public of that submission.
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 180 (Monday, September 17, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 180 (Monday, September 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46987-46989]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20180]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: 30-Day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) is publishing this 
notice to comply with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA), which requires agencies to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public of that 
submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before October 17, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the information collection by name 
and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Agency Clearance 
Officer, Curtis Rich, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and SBA Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, 
(202) 205-7030 curtis.rich@sba.gov.
    Copies: A copy of the Form OMB 83-1, supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for

[[Page 46988]]

review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SBA's Office of Credit Risk Management 
(OCRM) is responsible for the oversight and supervision of the SBA 
operations of approximately 4000 7(a) Lenders, Certified Development 
Companies (``CDCs''), and Microloan Intermediaries 
(``Intermediaries''), that participate in SBA's business loan programs 
and, for enforcement of the applicable rules and regulations. 
Currently, the agency guarantees more than $90 billion dollars in small 
business loans through these programs. The information collection 
described in detail below helps OCRM protect the safety and soundness 
of the business loan programs and taxpayer dollars.
    In general, SBA collects information in connection with PARRiS \1\ 
reviews for 7(a) Federally-regulated Lenders, SMART \2\ reviews for 
CDCs, and PARRiS Safety and Soundness Examinations for SBA Supervised 
Lenders including Small Business Lending Companies (SBLCs) and Non-
Federally Regulated Lenders (NFRLs).\3\ SBA also requests certain 
information when it conducts Delegated Authority Reviews of 7(a) 
Lenders and CDCs, and Microloan Intermediary Site Visits. The 
discussion below identifies the nature of the information to be 
collected for each type of lender and the related review or 
examination. In addition, SBA has created separate lists, which are 
also discussed below, to clearly identify the information to be 
collected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ PARRiS refers to the specific risk components reviewed for 
7(a) Lenders: (i) Portfolio Performance; (ii) Asset Management; 
(iii) Regulatory Compliance; (iv) Risk Management; and (v) Special 
Items.
    \2\ SMART refers to the specific risk components reviewed for 
Certified Development Companies: (i) Solvency and Financial 
Condition; (ii) Management and Board Governance; (iii) Asset Quality 
and Servicing; (iv) Regulatory Compliance; and (v) Technical Issues 
and Mission.
    \3\ SBLCs and NFRLs are defined in 15 U.S.C. 632(r) and 13 CFR 
120.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. 7(a) Lender and CDC PARRIS and SMART Analytical and Full Reviews and 
Safety and Soundness Exams

A. Common Information Collected

    For all Analytical Reviews, Full Reviews, and Safety and Soundness 
examinations \4\ of 7(a) lenders and CDCs, as applicable, in general, 
SBA requests information related to the lender's or CDC's management 
and operation, eligibility of its SBA loans for SBA guaranty, 
compliance with SBA Loan Program Requirements, credit administration, 
and performance of its SBA loan portfolio.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Safety and Soundness Examinations are only performed on SBA 
Supervised Lenders in the 7(a) program. SBA Supervised Lenders 
include SBA licensed Small Business Lending Companies and Non-
Federally Regulated Lenders as defined in 13 CFR 120.10. Analytical 
Reviews and Full Reviews are performed on 7(a) Lenders and CDCs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Management and Operations: The information requested generally 
includes the SBA program organization chart with responsibilities, 
business plan, financial and program audits, evidence of lender 
compliance with regulatory orders and agreements (if applicable and as 
appropriate), and staff training on SBA lending.
    2. Eligibility and Credit Administration: In reviewing these areas, 
SBA primarily requests lender's or CDC's policies, loan sample files; 
independent loan reviews; loan credit scoring and risk rating 
methodologies; and information on loans approved as exceptions to 
policy.
    3. Compliance with Loan Program Requirements: Here, SBA collects 
information on services and fees charged for Third-party vendors,\5\ 
lender's FTA\6\ trust account, and lender's use of the System of Awards 
Management to perform agent due diligence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For purposes of this notice, Third-party vendors include, 
for example, Loan Agents (e.g., Packagers and Lender Service 
Providers) and Professional Managers with management contracts.
    \6\ FTA refers to SBA's Fiscal and Transfer Agent. 7(a) Lenders 
that sell SBA loans in the Secondary Market are required by the 
terms of the Form 1086, Secondary Participation Guaranty Agreement, 
to deposit the guaranteed portion of loan payments in a segregated 
account for the benefit of investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Portfolio Performance: In considering lender or CDC portfolio 
performance, SBA requests that lenders provide a listing of loans 
indicating those past due, those with servicing actions, individual 
risk ratings, and those in liquidation or purchased for SBA to compare 
with SBA data. SBA also requests that lenders provide an explanation 
for risks identified (e.g., identified by high risk metrics or PARRiS 
flags triggered).
    Further detail on the information SBA collects in Analytical and 
Full Reviews and Safety and Soundness Exams is contained in the SBA 
Supervised Lender Safety and Soundness Examination/Full Review 
Information Request; 7(a) Lender PARRiS Analytical Review Information 
Request; CDC SMART Analytical Review Information Request; 7(a) Lender 
PARRiS Full Review Information Request; and, CDC SMART Full Review 
Information Request. Each Information Request document is available 
upon request.

B. SBA Supervised Lender Supplemental Information for Safety and 
Soundness Exams

    SBA is the primary federal regulator for SBA licensed SBLCs and 
NFRLs that participate in the 7(a) program.\7\ Because SBA is the 
primary federal regulator, SBA performs comprehensive exams that 
require information in addition to that referenced in Section I.A. 
Specifically, for SBA Supervised Lender examinations, SBA additionally 
requests corporate governance documents and information on the lender's 
financial condition, internal controls and risk mitigation. SBA also 
requests information on higher risk loans, payments related to loans in 
loan sample, fidelity insurance, credit scoring model validation and 
lender self-testing for compliance with SBA Loan Program Requirements. 
SBA Supervised Lender safety and soundness examinations include review 
of capital, earnings, and liquidity in accordance with 13 CFR 
120.1050(b) and accordingly, SBA requests information on the lender's 
financing, asset account calculations, and dividend policy. Further 
detail on the information that SBA requests for SBA Supervised Lender 
examinations is contained in SBA Supervised Lender Safety and Soundness 
Examination/Full Review Information Request. This document is available 
upon request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ SBA Supervised Lenders are a relatively small subset of 7(a) 
Lenders. 7(a) Lenders include SBA Supervised Lenders and Federally 
Regulated 7(a) Lenders (i.e., those lenders regulated by the federal 
bank regulators--Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office 
of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve Board, the 
National Credit Union Administration, and the Farm Credit 
Administration).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. CDC Supplemental Information

    SBA is also the primary federal regulator for CDCs. SBA guarantees 
100% of 504 program debentures. Therefore, SBA also requests additional 
information to prudently oversee CDCs, as it does for SBA Supervised 
Lenders. The additional information generally requested includes 
corporate governance documents and information on lender's financial 
condition, internal controls and risk mitigation practices, and the 
CDC's plan for investment in other local economic development. In 
addition, SBA requests, as applicable, information on a CDC's Premier 
Certified Lenders Program (PCLP) Loan Loss Reserve Account and loans 
that a CDC packages for other 7(a) lenders. You may request a copy of 
the CDC SMART Analytical Review Information Request and CDC SMART Full 
Review

[[Page 46989]]

Information Request for more details on this supplemental information 
request.

I. 7(a) Lender and CDC Delegated Authority Reviews

    SBA collects information for Delegated Authority Reviews performed, 
in general, every two years for lenders applying or reapplying to SBA's 
Delegated Authority Programs (e.g., Preferred Lender Program for 7(a) 
Lenders and Accredited Lender Program or PCLP for CDCs).\8\ If a lender 
is scheduled to receive an Analytical or Full Review or a Safety and 
Soundness Examination during the same review cycle as a Delegated 
Authority Review, generally SBA will coordinate the timing of the 
reviews and the related information collections to lessen the burden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Through SBA's Delegated Authority programs, qualified 
lenders may process SBA loans with further autonomy and reduced 
paperwork than through regular SBA loan processing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For 7(a) delegated authority reviews, SBA requests information on 
organizational changes, staff training and experience, lender 
explanation for risk indicators triggered, lender risk mitigation 
efforts, lender's financial condition, lender's deficiencies underlying 
regulatory orders (if applicable and as appropriate), and loan sample 
files (as requested).
    For CDC delegated authority reviews, SBA requests corporate 
governance documents and additional information on organization/staff, 
financial condition, internal controls and risk mitigation. SBA also 
requests a CDC's policies including its no-adverse-change 
determination, loan reviews, and lender explanation for its higher risk 
metrics.
    For more detail on Delegated Authority Review collections, you may 
request a copy of the 7(a) Lender Nomination for Delegated Authority 
Information Request; and, the ALP/PCLP Renewal Guide and Information 
Request.

II. Microloan Intermediary Reviews

    For Microloan Program Intermediary oversight, SBA District Offices 
perform an annual site visit for active Intermediaries. SBA requests 
information on SBA program management and operations including 
organizational chart with responsibilities, business plan, staff 
training on SBA lending, and risk mitigation practices. SBA primarily 
reviews the Intermediary's credit administration through a loan sample 
file request. Specifics on the information collected are contained in 
SBA's Microloan Intermediary Site Visit/Review Information Request 
document, a copy of which is available upon request.

III. Other Reviews, Corrective Action Plans, and Increased Supervision 
for 7(a) Lenders, CDCs, and Intermediaries

    SBA may pose additional information requests for its Other 
Reviews,\9\ generally of higher risk lenders. For example, for 7(a) 
lenders under a public regulatory order or agreement, SBA may request 
information relating to the status of the underlying deficiencies, as 
appropriate, or request loan files for SBA to review to mitigate risk 
before the loan can be sold into the secondary market. SBA may also 
request corrective action plans from lenders following reviews where 
findings and deficiencies are identified. Finally, SBA may request 
additional information of lenders under increased supervision. However, 
information requests for increased supervision tend to be lender 
specific.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Other Reviews may include, for example, Secondary Market 
loan reviews, reviews of lender self-assessments, or Agreed Upon 
Procedures Reviews performed by third-party practitioners or an 
independent office within the Lender to which SBA and the Lender 
agree, that follow a review protocol as prescribed or approved by 
SBA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In general, for information that has already been provided by a 
7(a) lender, a CDC, or a Microloan Intermediary but is unchanged, a 
lender may certify that the information was already provided and is 
unchanged in lieu of resubmitting the information. The certification 
must also state to whom and on what date the information was provided 
to SBA.

Summary of Information Collection

    Title: SBA Lender and Microloan Intermediary Reporting Requirements 
OMB Control Number: 3245-0365.
    Description of Respondents: SBA 7(A) Lenders, Certified Development 
Companies, and Microloan Intermediary lenders.
    Form Numbers: N/A.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 1,861.
    Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 14,573.

Solicitation of Public Comments

    Comments may be submitted on (a) whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the agency to properly perform its 
functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are accurate; (c) whether 
there are ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
automated techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information.

Curtis Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2018-20180 Filed 9-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2018 / Notices 46987

similar products as their counterparts therefore waives the 30-day operative printing in the Commission’s Public
on other exchanges, while at the same delay and designates the proposed rule Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
time allowing the Exchange to continue change to be operative upon filing.21 Washington, DC 20549, on official
to compete for order flow with other At any time within 60 days of the business days between the hours of
exchanges in option issues. filing of such proposed rule change, the 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
Commission summarily may filing also will be available for
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s temporarily suspend such rule change if
Statement on Comments on the inspection and copying at the principal
it appears to the Commission that such office of the Exchange. All comments
Proposed Rule Change Received From action is necessary or appropriate in the
Members, Participants, or Others received will be posted without change.
public interest, for the protection of Persons submitting comments are
Written comments were neither investors, or otherwise in furtherance of cautioned that we do not redact or edit
solicited nor received. the purposes of the Act. If the personal identifying information from
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Commission takes such action, the comment submissions. You should
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission shall institute proceedings submit only information that you wish
Commission Action under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 22 of the Act to to make available publicly. All
determine whether the proposed rule submissions should refer to File
The Exchange has filed the proposed change should be approved or Number SR–PEARL–2018–18 and
rule change pursuant to Section disapproved. should be submitted on or before
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 15 and Rule
IV. Solicitation of Comments October 9, 2018.
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.16 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i) Interested persons are invited to For the Commission, by the Division of
Significantly affect the protection of submit written data, views, and Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
investors or the public interest; (ii) authority.23
arguments concerning the foregoing,
impose any significant burden on including whether the proposed rule Eduardo A. Aleman,
competition; and (iii) become operative change is consistent with the Act. Assistant Secretary.
prior to 30 days from the date on which Comments may be submitted by any of [FR Doc. 2018–20191 Filed 9–14–18; 8:45 am]
it was filed, or such shorter time as the the following methods: BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of Electronic Comments
investors and the public interest, the • Use the Commission’s internet SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
proposed rule change has become comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) rules/sro.shtml); or Reporting and Recordkeeping
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) • Send an email to rule-comments@ Requirements Under OMB Review
thereunder.17 sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
A proposed rule change filed under PEARL–2018–18 on the subject line. AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 18 normally does not ACTION: 30-Day notice.
Paper Comments
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant • Send paper comments in triplicate SUMMARY: The Small Business
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Administration (SBA) is publishing this
to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),19 the Commission
Commission, 100 F Street NE, notice to comply with requirements of
may designate a shorter time if such the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
action is consistent with the protection Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File which requires agencies to submit
of investors and the public interest. The proposed reporting and recordkeeping
Exchange has asked the Commission to Number SR–PEARL–2018–18. This file
number should be included on the requirements to OMB for review and
waive the 30-day operative delay so that approval, and to publish a notice in the
the proposal may become operative subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your Federal Register notifying the public of
immediately upon filing. The that submission.
Commission notes that the Exchange’s comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will DATES: Submit comments on or before
proposal would conform the Exchange’s
rules to the amended OLPP, which the post all comments on the Commission’s October 17, 2018.
Commission previously approved.20 internet website (http://www.sec.gov/ ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
Accordingly, the Commission believes rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the the information collection by name and/
that the proposal raises no new or novel submission, all subsequent or OMB Control Number and should be
regulatory issues and waiver of the 30- amendments, all written statements sent to: Agency Clearance Officer, Curtis
day operative delay is consistent with with respect to the proposed rule Rich, Small Business Administration,
the protection of investors and the change that are filed with the 409 3rd Street SW, 5th Floor,
public interest. The Commission Commission, and all written Washington, DC 20416; and SBA Desk
communications relating to the Officer, Office of Information and
15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). proposed rule change between the Regulatory Affairs, Office of
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). Commission and any person, other than Management and Budget, New
17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
those that may be withheld from the Executive Office Building, Washington,
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to public in accordance with the DC 20503.
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

description and text of the proposed rule change, available for website viewing and Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing (202) 205–7030 curtis.rich@sba.gov.
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time 21 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
Copies: A copy of the Form OMB 83–
operative delay, the Commission has also
has satisfied this requirement. considered the proposed rule’s impact on
1, supporting statement, and other
18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See documents submitted to OMB for
19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
20 See OLPP Notice, supra note 3. 22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 23 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Sep 14, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM 17SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2018 / Notices 46989

Information Request for more details on document, a copy of which is available there are ways to enhance the quality,
this supplemental information request. upon request. utility, and clarity of the information.
I. 7(a) Lender and CDC Delegated III. Other Reviews, Corrective Action Curtis Rich,
Authority Reviews Plans, and Increased Supervision for Management Analyst.
SBA collects information for 7(a) Lenders, CDCs, and Intermediaries [FR Doc. 2018–20180 Filed 9–14–18; 8:45 am]
Delegated Authority Reviews BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
performed, in general, every two years SBA may pose additional information
for lenders applying or reapplying to requests for its Other Reviews,9
SBA’s Delegated Authority Programs generally of higher risk lenders. For DEPARTMENT OF STATE
(e.g., Preferred Lender Program for 7(a) example, for 7(a) lenders under a public
regulatory order or agreement, SBA may [Public Notice: 10545]
Lenders and Accredited Lender Program
or PCLP for CDCs).8 If a lender is request information relating to the status
Notice of Intent To Prepare a
scheduled to receive an Analytical or of the underlying deficiencies, as
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Full Review or a Safety and Soundness appropriate, or request loan files for
Statement for the Proposed Keystone
Examination during the same review SBA to review to mitigate risk before the
XL Pipeline Mainline Alternative Route
cycle as a Delegated Authority Review, loan can be sold into the secondary in Nebraska
generally SBA will coordinate the market. SBA may also request corrective
timing of the reviews and the related action plans from lenders following ACTION: Notice of intent.
information collections to lessen the reviews where findings and deficiencies
burden. are identified. Finally, SBA may request SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of State
For 7(a) delegated authority reviews, additional information of lenders under (Department) issues this Notice of Intent
SBA requests information on increased supervision. However, (NOI) to announce that it will prepare
organizational changes, staff training information requests for increased a Supplemental Environmental Impact
and experience, lender explanation for supervision tend to be lender specific. Statement (SEIS)—consistent with the
risk indicators triggered, lender risk National Environmental Policy Act
In general, for information that has (NEPA) of 1969—to analyze the
mitigation efforts, lender’s financial
already been provided by a 7(a) lender, potential environmental impacts of the
condition, lender’s deficiencies
underlying regulatory orders (if a CDC, or a Microloan Intermediary but Keystone XL Mainline Alternative Route
applicable and as appropriate), and loan is unchanged, a lender may certify that (MAR).
sample files (as requested). the information was already provided FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For CDC delegated authority reviews, and is unchanged in lieu of resubmitting Detailed records on the proposed Project
SBA requests corporate governance the information. The certification must are available at: https://
documents and additional information also state to whom and on what date the keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov.
on organization/staff, financial information was provided to SBA. Marko Velikonja, Keystone XL
condition, internal controls and risk Program Manager, Office of
Summary of Information Collection
mitigation. SBA also requests a CDC’s Environmental Quality and
policies including its no-adverse-change Title: SBA Lender and Microloan Transboundary Issues, U.S. Department
determination, loan reviews, and lender Intermediary Reporting Requirements of State, 2201 C Street NW, Washington
explanation for its higher risk metrics. OMB Control Number: 3245–0365. DC 20520. (202) 647–4828,
For more detail on Delegated VelikonjaMG@state.gov.
Authority Review collections, you may Description of Respondents: SBA 7(A)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
request a copy of the 7(a) Lender Lenders, Certified Development January 26, 2017, TransCanada
Nomination for Delegated Authority Companies, and Microloan Intermediary Keystone Pipeline, L.P. (TransCanada)
Information Request; and, the ALP/ lenders. resubmitted its 2012 Presidential permit
PCLP Renewal Guide and Information Form Numbers: N/A. application for the border facilities for
Request. Total Estimated Annual Responses: the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline. The
II. Microloan Intermediary Reviews 1,861. Under Secretary of State for Political
Affairs determined that issuance of a
For Microloan Program Intermediary Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: Presidential permit to TransCanada to
oversight, SBA District Offices perform 14,573. construct, connect, operate, and
an annual site visit for active maintain pipeline facilities at the
Solicitation of Public Comments
Intermediaries. SBA requests northern border of the United States to
information on SBA program Comments may be submitted on (a) transport crude oil from Canada to the
management and operations including whether the collection of information is United States would serve the national
organizational chart with necessary for the agency to properly interest. Accordingly, on March 23,
responsibilities, business plan, staff perform its functions; (b) whether the 2017, the Under Secretary issued a
training on SBA lending, and risk burden estimates are accurate; (c) Presidential permit to TransCanada for
mitigation practices. SBA primarily whether there are ways to minimize the the Keystone XL Pipeline border
reviews the Intermediary’s credit burden, including through the use of facilities. Subsequently, on November
administration through a loan sample automated techniques or other forms of 20, 2017, the Nebraska Public Service
file request. Specifics on the information technology; and (d) whether Commission approved the Mainline
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

information collected are contained in Alternative Route for that pipeline in
SBA’s Microloan Intermediary Site 9 Other Reviews may include, for example, the State of Nebraska. TransCanada’s
Visit/Review Information Request Secondary Market loan reviews, reviews of lender application to the Bureau of Land
self-assessments, or Agreed Upon Procedures Management for a right-of-way remains
8 Through SBA’s Delegated Authority programs, Reviews performed by third-party practitioners or
qualified lenders may process SBA loans with an independent office within the Lender to which pending with that agency.
further autonomy and reduced paperwork than SBA and the Lender agree, that follow a review On May 25, 2018, the Department
through regular SBA loan processing. protocol as prescribed or approved by SBA. issued a Notice of Intent to Prepare an

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Sep 14, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM 17SEN1
Document Created: 2018-09-15 01:37:18
Document Modified: 2018-09-15 01:37:18
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		30-Day notice.
Dates		Submit comments on or before October 17, 2018.
Contact		Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7030 [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 46987