83 FR 47855 - Air Plan Approval; South Carolina: Revisions to Prevention of Significant Deterioration Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 184 (September 21, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 184 (September 21, 2018)
| Page Range | 47855-47856 | |
| FR Document | 2018-20529 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 47855-47856] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-20529] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0073; FRL-9984-11--Region 4] Air Plan Approval; South Carolina: Revisions to Prevention of Significant Deterioration Rules AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve portions of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of South Carolina, through the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC), on September 5, 2017, that seek to revise certain New Source Review (NSR) regulations regarding the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program. EPA is proposing this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 22, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04- OAR-2018-0073 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or via electronic mail at akers.brad@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. What action is EPA taking today? On September 5, 2017, SC DHEC submitted a SIP revision to EPA for approval that involves changes to South Carolina's NSR permitting regulations to make them consistent with federal requirements for NSR permitting, correct typographical errors, make internal references consistent, and update public noticing procedures.\1\ These changes include revisions to NSR public notice requirements in SC DHEC Regulation 61-62.5, Standard No. 7--``Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) at sections (q) and (w)(4) to address the federal rule entitled ``Revisions to Public Notice Provisions in Clean Air Act Permitting Programs,'' Final Rule, 81 FR 71613 (October 18, 2016) (also referred to as the e-Notice Rule). In this proposed action, EPA is approving the SIP revision that makes changes to South Carolina's NSR regulations at SC DHEC Regulation 61-62.5, Standard No. 7 which applies to the construction or modification of any major stationary source in areas designated as attainment or unclassifiable as required by part C of title I of the CAA, with the exception of the portions of the SIP revision related to the e-Notice Rule. EPA has addressed the e-notice portions of the SIP revision in a separate proposed action. See 83 FR 39638 (August 10, 2018). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Also on September 5, 2017, South Carolina submitted separate SIP revisions with: Changes to Regulation 61-62.1, Section I-- ``Definitions'' and Regulation 61-62.5, Standard No. 5.2--``Control of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX );'' the adoption of Regulation 61-62.97--``Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) Trading Program;'' and changes to the regional haze SIP. The SIP revision related to Regulation 61-62.97 (CSAPR) was previously approved on October 13, 2017 (82 FR 47939). EPA will address the remaining SIP revisions in separate actions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- South Carolina's PSD regulations at Regulation 61-62.5, Standard No. 7, were originally approved into the SIP on June 10, 1982 (47 FR 6017), with periodic revisions approved through August 10, 2017 (82 FR 37299). EPA is proposing to approve changes submitted in South Carolina's September 5, 2017, SIP revision to modify the PSD regulations to make minor edits for internal consistency and to adopt changes for consistency with EPA's 2016 permit rescission rule entitled ``Rescission of Preconstruction Permits Issued Under the Clean Air Act'' Final Rule, 81 FR 78043 (November 7, 2016) (hereinafter referred to as the Permit Rescission Rule). II. Background This proposed action seeks to revise South Carolina's PSD regulations in the SIP as described in Section III, below. Many of these changes are administrative in nature, including updating internal references and correcting typographical errors. The September 5, 2017, SIP revision also makes changes to the PSD regulations to adopt corrective provisions from EPA's Permit Rescission Rule. On November 7, 2016, EPA published the Permit Rescission Rule, which addressed the rescission of preconstruction permits for PSD. The rule made the following changes to the Agency's PSD rule at 40 CFR 52.21: (1) Removed a date restriction that only allowed the rescission of PSD permits issued under PSD rules in effect as of July 30, 1987; (2) clarified that permit rescission is not automatic; and (3) corrected an outdated cross-reference. EPA removed the July 30, 1987 date restriction from the federal rule because there are circumstances where it may be appropriate to rescind PSD permits issued under rules in effect after this date pursuant to the criteria in 40 CFR 52.21(w)(3) of the Permit Rescission Rule. For additional information on provisions in the Permit Rescission Rule, see 81 FR 78043 (November 7, 2016). III. Analysis of the State's September 5, 2017, Submittal The September 5, 2017, SIP revision makes several changes to Regulation 61-62.5, Standard No. 7 at section (w)--entitled ``Permit rescission''--to be consistent with the federal provisions for rescinding PSD permits.\2\ Paragraph (w)(1) currently states that PSD permits issued pursuant to Standard No. 7 remain in effect until they expire or are rescinded. This subparagraph is revised in South Carolina's submittal to clarify that section (w) is the only provision under which permit rescission is allowed. Next, paragraph (w)(2) is revised to remove the date restriction discussed in Section II, above, that limits rescission to PSD permits issued [[Page 47856]] under PSD rules in effect on or before July 30, 1987. South Carolina's revised language is consistent with the federal Permit Rescission Rule, allowing for permit rescission if the permit meets the requirement of paragraph (w)(3). Finally, paragraph (w)(3) is revised to change the word ``shall'' to ``may'' to clarify that this provision does not create a mandatory duty for the State. This change is consistent with the Permit Rescission Rule at 40 CFR 52.21(w)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ South Carolina also revised 61-62.5, Standard No. 7 at paragraph (w)(4) to address EPA's eNotice Rule. As discussed above, EPA proposed to approve this change in a separate proposed action. See 83 FR 39638 (August 10, 2018). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The September 5, 2017, SIP revision also revises other paragraphs in Regulation 61-62.5, Standard No. 7 for consistency in formatting, to correct internal references, and to correct typographical errors. Section (b) is modified at paragraph (34), subparagraph (vi), to correct a typographical error in the definition of ``Net emissions increase.'' Next, sections (w), (aa), and (bb) are revised to be in bold font for internal consistency. Finally, Standard No. 7 is revised to make internal references and formatting consistent by making changes in section (aa) at (aa)(1)(i), (aa)(9), (aa)(11)(i), and (aa)(14)(i). EPA preliminarily finds that South Carolina's revised rules are consistent with federal requirements and CAA section 110. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the SC DHEC regulatory paragraphs identified above in Section III within SC DHEC Regulation 61-62.5, Standard No. 7, entitled ``Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD),'' state effective on August 25, 2017. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). V. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve the changes to the SIP identified in Section III, above, because they are consistent with the CAA and its implementing regulations. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed approval for the State of South Carolina does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because it does not have substantial direct effects on an Indian Tribe. The Catawba Indian Nation Reservation is located within the boundary of York County, South Carolina. Pursuant to the Catawba Indian Claims Settlement Act, S.C. Code Ann. 27-16-120, ``all state and local environmental laws and regulations apply to the [Catawba Indian Nation] and Reservation and are fully enforceable by all relevant state and local agencies and authorities.'' EPA notes this action will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: September 10, 2018. Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III, Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2018-20529 Filed 9-20-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules 47855
Dated: September 18, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: internal consistency and to adopt
Scott E. Anderson, D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory changes for consistency with EPA’s
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Management Section, Air Planning and 2016 permit rescission rule entitled
Port Delaware Bay. Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides ‘‘Rescission of Preconstruction Permits
[FR Doc. 2018–20572 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Issued Under the Clean Air Act’’ Final
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Environmental Protection Agency, Rule, 81 FR 78043 (November 7, 2016)
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, (hereinafter referred to as the Permit
Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers can be Rescission Rule).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION reached via telephone at (404) 562–9089
II. Background
AGENCY or via electronic mail at akers.brad@
epa.gov. This proposed action seeks to revise
40 CFR Part 52 South Carolina’s PSD regulations in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SIP as described in Section III, below.
[EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0073; FRL–9984– I. What action is EPA taking today? Many of these changes are
11—Region 4] administrative in nature, including
On September 5, 2017, SC DHEC
Air Plan Approval; South Carolina: submitted a SIP revision to EPA for updating internal references and
Revisions to Prevention of Significant approval that involves changes to South correcting typographical errors. The
Deterioration Rules Carolina’s NSR permitting regulations to September 5, 2017, SIP revision also
make them consistent with federal makes changes to the PSD regulations to
AGENCY: Environmental Protection requirements for NSR permitting, adopt corrective provisions from EPA’s
Agency (EPA). correct typographical errors, make Permit Rescission Rule.
ACTION: Proposed rule. internal references consistent, and On November 7, 2016, EPA published
update public noticing procedures.1 the Permit Rescission Rule, which
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection addressed the rescission of
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve These changes include revisions to NSR
public notice requirements in SC DHEC preconstruction permits for PSD. The
portions of a State Implementation Plan rule made the following changes to the
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 7—
‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration Agency’s PSD rule at 40 CFR 52.21: (1)
South Carolina, through the South Removed a date restriction that only
Carolina Department of Health and (PSD) at sections (q) and (w)(4) to
address the federal rule entitled allowed the rescission of PSD permits
Environmental Control (SC DHEC), on issued under PSD rules in effect as of
September 5, 2017, that seek to revise ‘‘Revisions to Public Notice Provisions
in Clean Air Act Permitting Programs,’’ July 30, 1987; (2) clarified that permit
certain New Source Review (NSR) rescission is not automatic; and (3)
regulations regarding the Prevention of Final Rule, 81 FR 71613 (October 18,
2016) (also referred to as the e-Notice corrected an outdated cross-reference.
Significant Deterioration (PSD) EPA removed the July 30, 1987 date
permitting program. EPA is proposing Rule). In this proposed action, EPA is
approving the SIP revision that makes restriction from the federal rule because
this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act there are circumstances where it may be
(CAA or Act). changes to South Carolina’s NSR
regulations at SC DHEC Regulation 61– appropriate to rescind PSD permits
DATES: Comments must be received on issued under rules in effect after this
62.5, Standard No. 7 which applies to
or before October 22, 2018. date pursuant to the criteria in 40 CFR
the construction or modification of any
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, major stationary source in areas 52.21(w)(3) of the Permit Rescission
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– designated as attainment or Rule. For additional information on
OAR–2018–0073 at http:// unclassifiable as required by part C of provisions in the Permit Rescission
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online title I of the CAA, with the exception of Rule, see 81 FR 78043 (November 7,
instructions for submitting comments. the portions of the SIP revision related 2016).
Once submitted, comments cannot be to the e-Notice Rule. EPA has addressed III. Analysis of the State’s September 5,
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. the e-notice portions of the SIP revision 2017, Submittal
EPA may publish any comment received in a separate proposed action. See 83 FR
to its public docket. Do not submit The September 5, 2017, SIP revision
39638 (August 10, 2018). makes several changes to Regulation 61–
electronically any information you South Carolina’s PSD regulations at
consider to be Confidential Business 62.5, Standard No. 7 at section (w)—
Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 7,
Information (CBI) or other information entitled ‘‘Permit rescission’’—to be
were originally approved into the SIP on
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. consistent with the federal provisions
June 10, 1982 (47 FR 6017), with
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, for rescinding PSD permits.2 Paragraph
periodic revisions approved through
etc.) must be accompanied by a written (w)(1) currently states that PSD permits
August 10, 2017 (82 FR 37299). EPA is
comment. The written comment is issued pursuant to Standard No. 7
proposing to approve changes submitted
considered the official comment and remain in effect until they expire or are
in South Carolina’s September 5, 2017,
should include discussion of all points rescinded. This subparagraph is revised
SIP revision to modify the PSD
you wish to make. EPA will generally in South Carolina’s submittal to clarify
regulations to make minor edits for
not consider comments or comment that section (w) is the only provision
contents located outside of the primary 1 Also on September 5, 2017, South Carolina
under which permit rescission is
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or submitted separate SIP revisions with: Changes to allowed. Next, paragraph (w)(2) is
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
other file sharing system). For Regulation 61–62.1, Section I—‘‘Definitions’’ and revised to remove the date restriction
Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 5.2—‘‘Control of discussed in Section II, above, that
additional submission methods, the full Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX);’’ the adoption of
EPA public comment policy, Regulation 61–62.97—‘‘Cross State Air Pollution
limits rescission to PSD permits issued
information about CBI or multimedia Rule (CSAPR) Trading Program;’’ and changes to
submissions, and general guidance on the regional haze SIP. The SIP revision related to 2 South Carolina also revised 61–62.5, Standard
Regulation 61–62.97 (CSAPR) was previously No. 7 at paragraph (w)(4) to address EPA’s eNotice
making effective comments, please visit approved on October 13, 2017 (82 FR 47939). EPA Rule. As discussed above, EPA proposed to approve
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ will address the remaining SIP revisions in separate this change in a separate proposed action. See 83
commenting-epa-dockets. actions. FR 39638 (August 10, 2018).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:30 Sep 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM 21SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_48039/page/1.svg)
![47856 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
under PSD rules in effect on or before Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, environmental laws and regulations
July 30, 1987. South Carolina’s revised EPA’s role is to approve state choices, apply to the [Catawba Indian Nation]
language is consistent with the federal provided that they meet the criteria of and Reservation and are fully
Permit Rescission Rule, allowing for the CAA. This action merely proposes to enforceable by all relevant state and
permit rescission if the permit meets the approve state law as meeting Federal local agencies and authorities.’’ EPA
requirement of paragraph (w)(3). requirements and does not impose notes this action will not impose
Finally, paragraph (w)(3) is revised to additional requirements beyond those substantial direct costs on Tribal
change the word ‘‘shall’’ to ‘‘may’’ to imposed by state law. For that reason, governments or preempt Tribal law.
clarify that this provision does not this proposed action:
create a mandatory duty for the State. • Is not a significant regulatory action List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
This change is consistent with the subject to review by the Office of Environmental protection, Air
Permit Rescission Rule at 40 CFR Management and Budget under pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
52.21(w)(3). Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Incorporation by reference,
The September 5, 2017, SIP revision October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
also revises other paragraphs in January 21, 2011); Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 7 for • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
consistency in formatting, to correct FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
internal references, and to correct action because SIP approvals are organic compounds.
typographical errors. Section (b) is exempted under Executive Order 12866; Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
modified at paragraph (34), • Does not impose an information
subparagraph (vi), to correct a collection burden under the provisions Dated: September 10, 2018.
typographical error in the definition of of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
‘‘Net emissions increase.’’ Next, sections U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Regional Administrator, Region 4.
(w), (aa), and (bb) are revised to be in • Is certified as not having a [FR Doc. 2018–20529 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am]
bold font for internal consistency. significant economic impact on a BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Finally, Standard No. 7 is revised to substantial number of small entities
make internal references and formatting under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
consistent by making changes in section U.S.C. 601 et seq.); ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
(aa) at (aa)(1)(i), (aa)(9), (aa)(11)(i), and • Does not contain any unfunded AGENCY
(aa)(14)(i). EPA preliminarily finds that mandate or significantly or uniquely
South Carolina’s revised rules are affect small governments, as described 40 CFR Part 52
consistent with federal requirements in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act [EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0308; FRL–9984–
and CAA section 110. of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 07—Region 4]
• Does not have Federalism
IV. Incorporation by Reference implications as specified in Executive Air Plan Approval; KY; Updates to
In this document, EPA is proposing to Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Attainment Status Designations
include in a final EPA rule regulatory 1999);
• Is not an economically significant AGENCY: Environmental Protection
text that includes incorporation by
regulatory action based on health or Agency (EPA).
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is safety risks subject to Executive Order ACTION: Proposed rule.
proposing to incorporate by reference 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); SUMMARY: The Commonwealth of
the SC DHEC regulatory paragraphs • Is not a significant regulatory action
Kentucky, through the Kentucky
identified above in Section III within SC subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
Division for Air Quality (KDAQ),
DHEC Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of submitted a revision to the Kentucky
7, entitled ‘‘Prevention of Significant State Implementation Plan (SIP) on
Deterioration (PSD),’’ state effective on section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement December 13, 2016. The SIP revision
August 25, 2017. EPA has made, and updates, as of October 6, 2016, the
will continue to make, these materials Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would description and attainment status
generally available through designations for geographic areas within
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the the Commonwealth for several National
Region 4 office (please contact the Ambient Air Quality Standards
person identified in the FOR FURTHER discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human (NAAQS). The updates are being made
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this to conform Kentucky’s attainment status
preamble for more information). health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible tables with the federal attainment status
V. Proposed Action methods, under Executive Order 12898 designations made for these areas. The
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
EPA is proposing to approve the
In addition, this proposed approval is proposing to approve Kentucky’s SIP
changes to the SIP identified in Section
for the State of South Carolina does not revision because it is consistent with the
III, above, because they are consistent
have Tribal implications as specified by Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA’s
with the CAA and its implementing
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, regulations.
regulations.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
November 9, 2000), because it does not DATES: Comments must be received on
VI. Statutory and Executive Order have substantial direct effects on an or before October 22, 2018.
Reviews Indian Tribe. The Catawba Indian ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Under the CAA, the Administrator is Nation Reservation is located within the identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
required to approve a SIP submission boundary of York County, South OAR–2018–0308 at http://
that complies with the provisions of the Carolina. Pursuant to the Catawba www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
Act and applicable Federal regulations. Indian Claims Settlement Act, S.C. Code instructions for submitting comments.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Ann. 27–16–120, ‘‘all state and local Once submitted, comments cannot be
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:30 Sep 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM 21SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_48039/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-09-21 00:24:16
Document Modified: 2018-09-21 00:24:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before October 22, 2018. | |
| Contact | D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 47855 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR