83_FR_48060 83 FR 47876 - Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

83 FR 47876 - Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 184 (September 21, 2018)

Page Range47876-47879
FR Document2018-20606

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that sodium gluconate, gluconic acid, and derivative products from the People's Republic of China (China) are being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV).

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 184 (Friday, September 21, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47876-47879]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20606]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-071]


Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products From the 
People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that sodium 
gluconate, gluconic acid, and derivative products from the People's 
Republic of China (China) are being sold in the United States at less 
than fair value (LTFV).

DATES: Applicable September 21, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magd Zalok or Stephen Bailey, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4162 or (202) 482-0193, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    This final determination is made in accordance with section 735(a) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On July 10, 2018, 
Commerce published in the Federal Register its preliminary affirmative 
determination of sales at LTFV investigation of sodium gluconate, 
gluconic acid, and derivative products from China.\1\ We invited 
interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Determination. On 
August 9, 2018, we received a case brief from PMP Fermentation 
Products, Inc., the petitioner in this investigation. We received no 
comments from other interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products 
from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 83 FR 31949 (July 10, 2018) 
(Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that followed the 
Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues 
raised by parties for this final determination, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum that is dated concurrently with this determination 
and hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all 
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department 
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum 
and the electronic version are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value 
Investigation of Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative 
Products from the People's Republic of China'' (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The products covered by this investigation are sodium gluconate, 
gluconic acid, and derivative products from China. For a complete 
description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I to this 
notice.
    No interested party commented on the scope published in the 
Preliminary Determination. Thus, Commerce has made no changes to the 
scope of the investigation from that published in the Initiation Notice 
and Preliminary Determination.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products 
from France and the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Less-
Than-FairValue Investigations, 83 FR 516 (January 4, 2018) 
(Initiation Notice); Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 31949 and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Investigation

    The period of investigation is April 1, 2017, through September 30, 
2017.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case brief that was submitted by the 
petitioner in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice at Appendix II.

China-Wide Entity

    For the reasons explained in the Preliminary Determination, we are 
continuing to find that the use of adverse facts available (AFA), 
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, is appropriate and are 
applying a rate based entirely on AFA to the China-wide entity.\4\ The 
China-wide entity includes Shandong Fuyang Biotechnology Co., Ltd./
Shandong Fuyang Biology Starch Co., Ltd.

[[Page 47877]]

(Shandong Fuyang),\5\ Qingdao Dongxiao Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Qingdao 
Dongxiao),\6\ Zhejiang Tianyi Food Additives Co., Ltd. (Tianyi 
Food),\7\ and Dezhou Huiyang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dezhou 
Huiyang).\8\ These companies failed to respond to Commerce's requests 
for information and withdrew from participation in this investigation. 
As these non-responsive companies did not demonstrate that they are 
eligible for separate rate status, Commerce continues to consider them 
to be part of the China-wide entity. Consequently, we continue to find 
that the China-wide entity, which includes these non-responsive 
companies, withheld requested information, significantly impeded this 
proceeding and failed to cooperate to the best of its ability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 11.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of 
Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products from the 
People's Republic of China: Respondent Selection,'' dated January 
17, 2018 (Initial Respondent Selection Memorandum). See also 
Shandong Fuyang letter, ``Notice of Non-Participation in 
Investigation,'' dated March 30, 2018.
    \6\ See Qingdao Dongxiao's Letter, ``Withdrawal from 
Participation,'' dated February 14, 2018.
    \7\ See Tianyi Food, see Commerce's Memorandum, ``Selection of 
Additional Respondent,'' dated March 5, 2018 and Tianyi Food's 
Letter, ``Withdrawal from Participation,'' dated March 8, 2018.
    \8\ See Dezhou Huiyang's Commerce's Memorandum, ``Selection of 
Additional Respondent,'' dated March 9, 2018 and Dezhou Huiyang's 
Letter, ``Dezhou Huiyang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Withdrawal of 
Participation in Antidumping Duty Investigation,'' dated March 13, 
2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Rate

    In selecting the AFA rate for the China-wide entity, Commerce's 
practice is to select a rate that is sufficiently adverse to ensure 
that the uncooperative party does not obtain a more favorable result by 
failing to cooperate than if it had fully cooperated.\9\ Specifically, 
it is Commerce's practice to select, as an AFA rate, the higher of: (a) 
The highest dumping margin alleged in the petition; or (b) the highest 
calculated dumping margin of any respondent in the investigation.\10\ 
There are no respondents for which we are calculating a separate 
dumping margin for the final determination. Thus, the highest (and 
only) rate on the record of the proceeding is the rate found in the 
Petition,\11\ which is the only information reasonably at Commerce's 
disposal to determine a rate that is sufficiently adverse to induce 
cooperation.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Statement of Administrative Action accompanying the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H.R. Rep. No. 103-316 at 870 (1994) 
(H.R. Rep 103-316), reprinted in 1994 U.S.C.A.A.N.
    \10\ See Silicon Metal from Australia: Affirmative Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative 
Determination of Critical Circumstances in Part, 83 FR 9839 (March 
8, 2018) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 
1.
    \11\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petition for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duties: Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and 
Derivative Products from the People's Republic of China and France'' 
(November 30, 2017) (the Petition).
    \12\ See, e.g., Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the 
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination 
of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 82 FR 28629 (June 23, 2017) and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at pages 31-32 (revised 
in Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and 
Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 
82 FR 53460 (November 16, 2017) because Commerce calculated a higher 
rate than the highest Petition rate to apply as the AFA rate)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thus, as AFA, Commerce assigned to the China-wide entity the rate 
of 213.15 percent, which is the sole dumping margin alleged in the 
Petition.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Petitioner's letter, ``Petition for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duties: Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and 
Derivative Products from the People's Republic of China and 
France,'' dated November 30, 2017 (the Petitions),
    Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products from 
France and the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-
Fair-Value Investigations, 83 FR 516 (January 4, 2018) (Initiation 
Notice), and Antidumping Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: 
Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products from the 
People's Republic of China, dated December 20, 2017 (China AD 
Initiation Checklist).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates

    For the final determination, we continue to find that the evidence 
placed on the record of this investigation by Anhui Xingzhou Medicine 
Food Co., Ltd. (Xingzhou Medicine) \14\ demonstrates an absence of de 
jure and de facto government control. Accordingly, consistent with its 
Preliminary Determination, Commerce assigned Xingzhou Medicine a 
separate rate, which is the petition rate, because it is the only rate 
available on the record of this proceeding. For a full description of 
the methodology underlying Commerce's final determination, see the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See, e.g., Xingzhou Medicine's Letter, ``Xingzhou Medicine 
Separate Rate Application,'' dated February 5, 2018; Commerce's 
Letter, ``1st Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding the Separate Rate 
Application for Anhui Xingzhou Medicine Food Co., Ltd.,'' dated 
February 27, 2018; Xingzhou Medicine's Letter, ``Supplemental SRA 
Questionnaire Response,'' dated March 6, 2018; Commerce's Letter, 
``2nd Supplemental Questionnaire regarding the Separate Rate 
Application for Anhui Xingzhou Medicine Food Co., Ltd.,'' dated 
March 22, 2018. and Xingzhou Medicine's Letter, ``Second 
Supplemental SRA Questionnaire Response,'' dated March 29, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combination Rates

    In the Initiation Notice, Commerce stated that it would calculate 
producer/exporter combination rates for the respondents that are 
eligible for a separate rate in this investigation.\15\ Policy Bulletin 
05.1 describes this practice.\16\ Because Commerce determined that the 
mandatory respondents originally selected are not eligible for separate 
rate status and, thus, should be considered part of the China-wide 
entity and assigned, as AFA, the petition rate to the China-wide 
entity, Commerce did not calculate producer/exporter combination rates 
for those respondents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Initiation Notice, 83 FR 516.
    \16\ See Enforcement and Compliance's Policy Bulletin No. 05.1, 
regarding, ``Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination 
Rates in Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market Economy 
Countries,'' (April 5, 2005) (Policy Bulletin 05.1), available on 
Commerce's website at http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.
    \17\ The China-wide Entity includes Dezhou Huiyang, Qingdao 
Dongxiao, Shandong Fuyang, and Tianyi Food.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination

    Commerce determines that sodium gluconate, gluconic acid, and 
derivative products from China are being, or are likely to be, sold in 
the United States at LTFV, and that the following dumping margins 
exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Estimated
                                                             weighted-
             Exporter                     Producer            average
                                                          dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anhui Xingzhou Medicine Food Co.,   Xiwang                        213.15
 Ltd.                                Pharmaceutical Co.,
                                     Ltd.
Anhui Xingzhou Medicine Food Co.,   Zhucheng Shuguang             213.15
 Ltd.                                Biotech Co., Ltd.
China-wide Entity \17\............  ....................          213.15
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 47878]]

Disclosure

    Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations 
performed in connection with a final determination within five days of 
any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within 
five days of the date of publication of the notice of final 
determination in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(b). However, because Commerce applied AFA to the China-wide 
entity (which includes the companies subject to individual examination) 
in this investigation, in accordance with section 776 of the Act, and 
the applied AFA rate is based solely on the Petition, there are no 
calculations to disclose.

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will direct 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend 
liquidation of all entries of sodium gluconate, gluconic acid, and 
derivative products from China, as described in Appendix I of this 
notice, which are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption 
on or after July 10, 2018, the date of publication in the Federal 
Register of the affirmative Preliminary Determination.
    Further, pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, Commerce 
will instruct CBP to collect a cash deposit as follows: (1) The rate 
for the exporters listed in the chart above will be the rate we have 
determined in this final determination; (2) for all Chinese exporters 
of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the 
cash-deposit rate will be the China-wide rate; and (3) for all non-
Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their 
own rate, the cash-deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the 
Chinese exporter/producer combination that supplied that non-Chinese 
exporter. These suspension-of-liquidation instructions will remain in 
effect until further notice. Because there has been no demonstration 
that an adjustment for domestic subsidies is warranted, Commerce has 
not made any such adjustment to the rate assigned to Xingzhou Medicine 
or the China-wide entity. Additionally, Commerce is making no 
adjustments for export subsidies to the antidumping cash deposit rate 
in this investigation because we have made no findings in the companion 
countervailing duty investigation that any of the programs are export 
subsidies.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid and Derivative Products 
from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative 
Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final 
Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 83 FR 23888 
(May 23, 2018) (Preliminary Affirmative CVD Determination) and 
accompanying Preliminary Determination Memorandum at 19 (``As AFA, 
pursuant to section 776(a) and (b), Commerce is finding all programs 
initiated upon in this proceeding to be countervailable--that is, 
they provide a financial contribution within the meaning of sections 
771(5)(B)(i) and (D) of the Act, confer a benefit within the meaning 
of section 771(5)(B) of the Act, and are specific within the meaning 
of section 771(5A) of the Act. Accordingly, all programs are 
included in Commerce's calculation of an AFA rate for Fuyang, Hongyu 
Chemical, Kaison, and Qingdao Dongxiao.'') (emphasis added). In the 
final determination of the companion countervailing duty 
investigation, Commerce made no changes to its analysis and 
calculations of subsidy rates from the Preliminary Affirmative CVD 
Determination. See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid and Derivative 
Products from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative 
Countervailing Duty Determination, and accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we intend to notify 
the International Trade Commission (ITC) of the final affirmative 
determination of sales at LTFV. As Commerce's final determination is 
affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC 
will determine, within 45 days, whether the domestic industry in the 
United States is materially injured, or threatened with material 
injury, by reason of imports of sodium gluconate, gluconic acid, and 
derivative products from China, or sales (or the likelihood of sales) 
for importation, of sodium gluconate, gluconic acid, and derivative 
products from China. If the ITC determines that such injury does not 
exist, this proceeding will be terminated, and all securities posted 
will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines that such injury 
does exist, Commerce intends to issue an antidumping duty order 
directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, 
antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective 
date of the suspension of liquidation.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice will serve as a reminder to the parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of propriety information disclosed under APO 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of 
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We intend to issue and publish this determination in accordance 
with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: September 17, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigation

    The scope of the investigation covers all grades of sodium 
gluconate, gluconic acid, liquid gluconate, and glucono delta 
lactone (GDL) (collectively GNA Products), regardless of physical 
form (including, but not limited to substrates; solutions; dry 
granular form or powders, regardless of particle size; or as a 
slurry). The scope also includes GNA Products that have been blended 
or are in solution with other product(s) where the resulting mix 
contains 35 percent or more of sodium gluconate, gluconic acid, 
liquid gluconate, and/or GDL by dry weight.
    Sodium gluconate has a molecular formula of 
NaC6H11O7. Sodium gluconate has a 
Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry number of 527-07-1, and can 
also be called ``sodium salt of gluconic acid'' and/or sodium 2, 3, 
4, 5, 6 pentahydroxyhexanoate. Gluconic acid has a molecular formula 
of C6H12O7. Gluconic acid has a CAS 
registry number of 526-95-4, and can also be called 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 
pentahydroxycaproic acid. Liquid gluconate is a blend consisting 
only of gluconic acid and sodium gluconate in an aqueous solution. 
Liquid gluconate has CAS registry numbers of 527-07-1, 526-95-4, and 
7732-18-5, and can also be called 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-pentahydroxycaproic 
acid-hexanoate. GDL has a molecular formula of 
C6H10O6. GDL has a CAS registry 
number of 90-80-2, and can also be called d-glucono-1,5-lactone.
    The merchandise covered by the scope of the investigation is 
currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS) under subheadings 2918.16.1000, 2918.16.5010, and 
2932.20.5020. Merchandise covered by the scope may also enter under 
HTSUS subheadings 2918.16.5050, 3824.99.2890, and 3824.99.9295. 
Although the HTSUS subheadings and CAS registry numbers are provided 
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the 
merchandise is dispositive.

Appendix II

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Issues
III. Background
IV. Scope of Investigation

[[Page 47879]]

V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to the 
China-wide Entity
    Comment 2: Whether to Assign the China-Wide Entity Rate to the 
Separate Rate Applicant
    Comment 3: Whether the Scope of the Investigation Should be 
Modified
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-20606 Filed 9-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                               47876                       Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices

                                               they are affiliated with (if any), and an               DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                Memorandum is a public document and
                                               email address prior to placing callers                                                                        is on file electronically via Enforcement
                                               into the conference call. Callers can                   International Trade Administration                    and Compliance’s Antidumping and
                                               expect to incur charges for calls they                  [A–570–071]                                           Countervailing Duty Centralized
                                               initiate over wireless lines, and the                                                                         Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
                                               Commission will not refund any                          Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and                  ACCESS is available to registered users
                                               incurred charges. Callers will incur no                 Derivative Products From the People’s                 at http://access.trade.gov, and is
                                               charge for calls they initiate over land-               Republic of China: Final Affirmative                  available to all parties in the Central
                                               line connections to the toll-free                       Determination of Sales at Less Than                   Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
                                               telephone number. Persons with hearing                  Fair Value                                            Department of Commerce building. In
                                               impairments may also follow the                                                                               addition, a complete version of the
                                                                                                       AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                  Issues and Decision Memorandum can
                                               proceedings by first calling the Federal                International Trade Administration,                   be accessed directly at http://
                                               Relay Service at 1–800–977–8339 and                     Department of Commerce.                               enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
                                               providing the Service with the                          SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce                   Issues and Decision Memorandum and
                                               conference call number and conference                   (Commerce) determines that sodium                     the electronic version are identical in
                                               ID number.                                              gluconate, gluconic acid, and derivative              content.
                                                  Members of the public are also                       products from the People’s Republic of
                                                                                                       China (China) are being sold in the                   Scope of the Investigation
                                               entitled to submit written comments;
                                               the comments must be received in the                    United States at less than fair value                    The products covered by this
                                               regional office within 30 days following                (LTFV).                                               investigation are sodium gluconate,
                                               the meeting. Written comments may be                    DATES:   Applicable September 21, 2018.               gluconic acid, and derivative products
                                               mailed to the Regional Program Unit                                                                           from China. For a complete description
                                                                                                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                               Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights,                                                                      of the scope of this investigation, see
                                                                                                       Magd Zalok or Stephen Bailey, AD/CVD
                                               230 S. Dearborn, Suite 2120, Chicago, IL                                                                      Appendix I to this notice.
                                                                                                       Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
                                               60604. They may also be faxed to the                                                                             No interested party commented on the
                                                                                                       Compliance, International Trade
                                               Commission at (312) 353–8324, or                                                                              scope published in the Preliminary
                                                                                                       Administration, U.S. Department of
                                               emailed to Regional Director, Jeffrey                                                                         Determination. Thus, Commerce has
                                                                                                       Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
                                               Hinton at jhinton@usccr.gov. Persons                                                                          made no changes to the scope of the
                                                                                                       NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
                                               who desire additional information may                                                                         investigation from that published in the
                                                                                                       (202) 482–4162 or (202) 482–0193,
                                               contact the Regional Program Unite                                                                            Initiation Notice and Preliminary
                                                                                                       respectively.
                                                                                                                                                             Determination.3
                                               Office at (312) 353–8311.                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                  Records generated from this meeting                                                                        Period of Investigation
                                                                                                       Background
                                               may be inspected and reproduced at the                                                                          The period of investigation is April 1,
                                               Regional Program Unit, as they become                      This final determination is made in                2017, through September 30, 2017.
                                               available, both before and after the                    accordance with section 735(a) of the
                                                                                                       Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).             Analysis of Comments Received
                                               meeting. Records of the meeting will be
                                               available via www.facadatabase.gov                      On July 10, 2018, Commerce published                    All issues raised in the case brief that
                                               under the Commission on Civil Rights,                   in the Federal Register its preliminary               was submitted by the petitioner in this
                                               South Carolina Advisory Committee                       affirmative determination of sales at                 investigation are addressed in the Issues
                                               link. Persons interested in the work of                 LTFV investigation of sodium                          and Decision Memorandum. A list of
                                               this Committee are directed to the                      gluconate, gluconic acid, and derivative              the issues addressed in the Issues and
                                               Commission’s website, http://                           products from China.1 We invited                      Decision Memorandum is attached to
                                                                                                       interested parties to comment on the                  this notice at Appendix II.
                                               www.usccr.gov, or may contact the
                                                                                                       Preliminary Determination. On August
                                               Southern Regional Office at the above                                                                         China-Wide Entity
                                                                                                       9, 2018, we received a case brief from
                                               email or street address.
                                                                                                       PMP Fermentation Products, Inc., the                    For the reasons explained in the
                                               Agenda                                                  petitioner in this investigation. We                  Preliminary Determination, we are
                                                                                                       received no comments from other                       continuing to find that the use of
                                               Welcome and Introductions                               interested parties.                                   adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant
                                               Dr. Geoffrey Alpert, University of South                   For a complete description of the                  to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, is
                                                 Carolina, Department of Criminology                   events that followed the Preliminary                  appropriate and are applying a rate
                                                 and Criminal Justice                                  Determination, as well as a full                      based entirely on AFA to the China-
                                                                                                       discussion of the issues raised by parties            wide entity.4 The China-wide entity
                                               Discussion on Policing Project                          for this final determination, see the                 includes Shandong Fuyang
                                               Open Comment                                            Issues and Decision Memorandum that                   Biotechnology Co., Ltd./Shandong
                                               Adjournment                                             is dated concurrently with this                       Fuyang Biology Starch Co., Ltd.
                                                                                                       determination and hereby adopted by
                                                 Dated: September 18, 2018.
                                                                                                       this notice.2 The Issues and Decision                 Investigation of Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid,
                                               David Mussatt,                                                                                                and Derivative Products from the People’s Republic
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES




                                               Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.                1 See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and          of China’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
                                               [FR Doc. 2018–20596 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am]             Derivative Products from the People’s Republic of       3 See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and

                                                                                                       China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less     Derivative Products from France and the People’s
                                               BILLING CODE P                                          Than Fair Value, 83 FR 31949 (July 10, 2018)          Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-
                                                                                                       (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying          FairValue Investigations, 83 FR 516 (January 4,
                                                                                                       Preliminary Decision Memorandum.                      2018) (Initiation Notice); Preliminary
                                                                                                         2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision             Determination, 83 FR at 31949 and accompanying
                                                                                                       Memorandum for the Final Affirmative                  Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5–6.
                                                                                                       Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value               4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 11.




                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:30 Sep 20, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00003   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM   21SEN1


                                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices                                                                                          47877

                                               (Shandong Fuyang),5 Qingdao Dongxiao                                 AFA rate, the higher of: (a) The highest                                    it is the only rate available on the record
                                               Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Qingdao                                        dumping margin alleged in the petition;                                     of this proceeding. For a full description
                                               Dongxiao),6 Zhejiang Tianyi Food                                     or (b) the highest calculated dumping                                       of the methodology underlying
                                               Additives Co., Ltd. (Tianyi Food),7 and                              margin of any respondent in the                                             Commerce’s final determination, see the
                                               Dezhou Huiyang Biotechnology Co.,                                    investigation.10 There are no                                               Issues and Decision Memorandum.
                                               Ltd. (Dezhou Huiyang).8 These                                        respondents for which we are
                                                                                                                    calculating a separate dumping margin                                       Combination Rates
                                               companies failed to respond to
                                               Commerce’s requests for information                                  for the final determination. Thus, the                                         In the Initiation Notice, Commerce
                                               and withdrew from participation in this                              highest (and only) rate on the record of                                    stated that it would calculate producer/
                                               investigation. As these non-responsive                               the proceeding is the rate found in the                                     exporter combination rates for the
                                               companies did not demonstrate that                                   Petition,11 which is the only                                               respondents that are eligible for a
                                               they are eligible for separate rate status,                          information reasonably at Commerce’s                                        separate rate in this investigation.15
                                               Commerce continues to consider them                                  disposal to determine a rate that is                                        Policy Bulletin 05.1 describes this
                                               to be part of the China-wide entity.                                 sufficiently adverse to induce                                              practice.16 Because Commerce
                                               Consequently, we continue to find that                               cooperation.12                                                              determined that the mandatory
                                               the China-wide entity, which includes                                  Thus, as AFA, Commerce assigned to
                                                                                                                                                                                                respondents originally selected are not
                                               these non-responsive companies,                                      the China-wide entity the rate of 213.15
                                                                                                                                                                                                eligible for separate rate status and,
                                               withheld requested information,                                      percent, which is the sole dumping
                                                                                                                                                                                                thus, should be considered part of the
                                               significantly impeded this proceeding                                margin alleged in the Petition.13
                                                                                                                                                                                                China-wide entity and assigned, as
                                               and failed to cooperate to the best of its                           Separate Rates                                                              AFA, the petition rate to the China-wide
                                               ability.                                                               For the final determination, we                                           entity, Commerce did not calculate
                                                                                                                    continue to find that the evidence                                          producer/exporter combination rates for
                                               China-Wide Rate
                                                                                                                    placed on the record of this                                                those respondents.
                                                  In selecting the AFA rate for the                                 investigation by Anhui Xingzhou                                             Final Determination
                                               China-wide entity, Commerce’s practice                               Medicine Food Co., Ltd. (Xingzhou
                                               is to select a rate that is sufficiently                             Medicine) 14 demonstrates an absence of                                        Commerce determines that sodium
                                               adverse to ensure that the uncooperative                             de jure and de facto government control.                                    gluconate, gluconic acid, and derivative
                                               party does not obtain a more favorable                               Accordingly, consistent with its                                            products from China are being, or are
                                               result by failing to cooperate than if it                            Preliminary Determination, Commerce                                         likely to be, sold in the United States at
                                               had fully cooperated.9 Specifically, it is                           assigned Xingzhou Medicine a separate                                       LTFV, and that the following dumping
                                               Commerce’s practice to select, as an                                 rate, which is the petition rate, because                                   margins exist:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Estimated
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   weighted-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    average
                                                                                     Exporter                                                                                         Producer                                                     dumping
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    margin
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   (percent)

                                               Anhui Xingzhou Medicine Food Co., Ltd ...................................                   Xiwang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd ................................................                              213.15
                                               Anhui Xingzhou Medicine Food Co., Ltd ...................................                   Zhucheng Shuguang Biotech Co., Ltd .......................................                                   213.15
                                               China-wide Entity 17 ....................................................................   .....................................................................................................        213.15


                                                  5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Less-Than-Fair-Value                          8, 2018) and accompanying Issues and Decision                               (Initiation Notice), and Antidumping Duty
                                               Investigation of Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid,                    Memorandum at Comment 1.                                                    Investigation Initiation Checklist: Sodium
                                               and Derivative Products from the People’s Republic                      11 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petition for                               Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products
                                               of China: Respondent Selection,’’ dated January 17,                  Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: Sodium                               from the People’s Republic of China, dated
                                               2018 (Initial Respondent Selection Memorandum).                      Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products                           December 20, 2017 (China AD Initiation Checklist).
                                               See also Shandong Fuyang letter, ‘‘Notice of Non-                    from the People’s Republic of China and France’’                               14 See, e.g., Xingzhou Medicine’s Letter,
                                               Participation in Investigation,’’ dated March 30,                    (November 30, 2017) (the Petition).                                         ‘‘Xingzhou Medicine Separate Rate Application,’’
                                               2018.                                                                   12 See, e.g., Certain Hardwood Plywood Products
                                                                                                                                                                                                dated February 5, 2018; Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘1st
                                                  6 See Qingdao Dongxiao’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal                     from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary                            Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding the
                                               from Participation,’’ dated February 14, 2018.                       Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than                             Separate Rate Application for Anhui Xingzhou
                                                  7 See Tianyi Food, see Commerce’s                                 Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination                           Medicine Food Co., Ltd.,’’ dated February 27, 2018;
                                               Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of Additional                                of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 82 FR 28629                             Xingzhou Medicine’s Letter, ‘‘Supplemental SRA
                                                                                                                    (June 23, 2017) and accompanying Preliminary                                Questionnaire Response,’’ dated March 6, 2018;
                                               Respondent,’’ dated March 5, 2018 and Tianyi
                                                                                                                    Decision Memorandum at pages 31–32 (revised in                              Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘2nd Supplemental
                                               Food’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal from Participation,’’
                                                                                                                    Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the                                  Questionnaire regarding the Separate Rate
                                               dated March 8, 2018.
                                                                                                                    People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of
                                                  8 See Dezhou Huiyang’s Commerce’s                                                                                                             Application for Anhui Xingzhou Medicine Food
                                                                                                                    Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Final
                                               Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of Additional                                                                                                            Co., Ltd.,’’ dated March 22, 2018. and Xingzhou
                                                                                                                    Affirmative Determination of Critical
                                               Respondent,’’ dated March 9, 2018 and Dezhou                                                                                                     Medicine’s Letter, ‘‘Second Supplemental SRA
                                                                                                                    Circumstances, in Part, 82 FR 53460 (November 16,
                                               Huiyang’s Letter, ‘‘Dezhou Huiyang Biotechnology                     2017) because Commerce calculated a higher rate                             Questionnaire Response,’’ dated March 29, 2018.
                                               Co., Ltd. Withdrawal of Participation in                                                                                                            15 See Initiation Notice, 83 FR 516.
                                                                                                                    than the highest Petition rate to apply as the AFA
                                               Antidumping Duty Investigation,’’ dated March 13,                    rate)).                                                                        16 See Enforcement and Compliance’s Policy
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES




                                               2018.                                                                   13 See Petitioner’s letter, ‘‘Petition for                               Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ‘‘Separate-Rates
                                                  9 See Statement of Administrative Action
                                                                                                                    Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: Sodium                               Practice and Application of Combination Rates in
                                               accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,                       Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative Products                           Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market
                                               H.R. Rep. No. 103–316 at 870 (1994) (H.R. Rep 103–                   from the People’s Republic of China and France,’’                           Economy Countries,’’ (April 5, 2005) (Policy
                                               316), reprinted in 1994 U.S.C.A.A.N.                                 dated November 30, 2017 (the Petitions),                                    Bulletin 05.1), available on Commerce’s website at
                                                  10 See Silicon Metal from Australia: Affirmative                     Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and Derivative                          http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.
                                               Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair                       Products from France and the People’s Republic of                              17 The China-wide Entity includes Dezhou

                                               Value and Final Affirmative Determination of                         China: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value                                   Huiyang, Qingdao Dongxiao, Shandong Fuyang,
                                               Critical Circumstances in Part, 83 FR 9839 (March                    Investigations, 83 FR 516 (January 4, 2018)                                 and Tianyi Food.



                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014       17:30 Sep 20, 2018       Jkt 244001      PO 00000      Frm 00004       Fmt 4703      Sfmt 4703        E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM               21SEN1


                                               47878                       Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices

                                               Disclosure                                              investigation that any of the programs                notification of return or destruction of
                                                                                                       are export subsidies.18                               APO materials or conversion to judicial
                                                 Normally, Commerce discloses to                                                                             protective order is hereby requested.
                                               interested parties the calculations                     International Trade Commission
                                                                                                                                                             Failure to comply with the regulations
                                               performed in connection with a final                    Notification
                                                                                                                                                             and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
                                               determination within five days of any                      In accordance with section 735(d) of               violation.
                                               public announcement or, if there is no                  the Act, we intend to notify the                        We intend to issue and publish this
                                               public announcement, within five days                   International Trade Commission (ITC) of               determination in accordance with
                                               of the date of publication of the notice                the final affirmative determination of                sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
                                               of final determination in the Federal                   sales at LTFV. As Commerce’s final
                                                                                                                                                               Dated: September 17, 2018.
                                               Register, in accordance with 19 CFR                     determination is affirmative, in
                                                                                                                                                             Gary Taverman,
                                               351.224(b). However, because                            accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the
                                                                                                       Act, the ITC will determine, within 45                Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
                                               Commerce applied AFA to the China-                                                                            and Countervailing Duty Operations,
                                               wide entity (which includes the                         days, whether the domestic industry in
                                                                                                                                                             performing the non-exclusive functions and
                                               companies subject to individual                         the United States is materially injured,              duties of the Assistant Secretary for
                                               examination) in this investigation, in                  or threatened with material injury, by                Enforcement and Compliance.
                                               accordance with section 776 of the Act,                 reason of imports of sodium gluconate,
                                               and the applied AFA rate is based solely                gluconic acid, and derivative products                Appendix I
                                               on the Petition, there are no calculations              from China, or sales (or the likelihood               Scope of the Investigation
                                               to disclose.                                            of sales) for importation, of sodium                     The scope of the investigation covers all
                                                                                                       gluconate, gluconic acid, and derivative              grades of sodium gluconate, gluconic acid,
                                               Continuation of Suspension of                           products from China. If the ITC                       liquid gluconate, and glucono delta lactone
                                               Liquidation                                             determines that such injury does not                  (GDL) (collectively GNA Products),
                                                                                                       exist, this proceeding will be                        regardless of physical form (including, but
                                                  In accordance with section                           terminated, and all securities posted                 not limited to substrates; solutions; dry
                                               735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will direct                 will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC              granular form or powders, regardless of
                                               U.S. Customs and Border Protection                      determines that such injury does exist,               particle size; or as a slurry). The scope also
                                               (CBP) to continue to suspend                            Commerce intends to issue an                          includes GNA Products that have been
                                               liquidation of all entries of sodium                                                                          blended or are in solution with other
                                                                                                       antidumping duty order directing CBP                  product(s) where the resulting mix contains
                                               gluconate, gluconic acid, and derivative                to assess, upon further instruction by                35 percent or more of sodium gluconate,
                                               products from China, as described in                    Commerce, antidumping duties on all                   gluconic acid, liquid gluconate, and/or GDL
                                               Appendix I of this notice, which are                    imports of the subject merchandise                    by dry weight.
                                               entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,                   entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,                    Sodium gluconate has a molecular formula
                                               for consumption on or after July 10,                    for consumption on or after the effective             of NaC6H11O7. Sodium gluconate has a
                                               2018, the date of publication in the                    date of the suspension of liquidation.                Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry
                                               Federal Register of the affirmative                                                                           number of 527–07–1, and can also be called
                                               Preliminary Determination.                              Notification Regarding Administrative                 ‘‘sodium salt of gluconic acid’’ and/or
                                                                                                       Protective Orders                                     sodium 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 pentahydroxyhexanoate.
                                                  Further, pursuant to section                                                                               Gluconic acid has a molecular formula of
                                               735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, Commerce                     This notice will serve as a reminder
                                                                                                       to the parties subject to administrative              C6H12O7. Gluconic acid has a CAS registry
                                               will instruct CBP to collect a cash                                                                           number of 526–95–4, and can also be called
                                                                                                       protective order (APO) of their
                                               deposit as follows: (1) The rate for the                                                                      2, 3, 4, 5, 6 pentahydroxycaproic acid. Liquid
                                                                                                       responsibility concerning the                         gluconate is a blend consisting only of
                                               exporters listed in the chart above will
                                                                                                       disposition of propriety information                  gluconic acid and sodium gluconate in an
                                               be the rate we have determined in this
                                                                                                       disclosed under APO in accordance                     aqueous solution. Liquid gluconate has CAS
                                               final determination; (2) for all Chinese
                                                                                                       with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written                   registry numbers of 527–07–1, 526–95–4, and
                                               exporters of subject merchandise which                                                                        7732–18–5, and can also be called 2, 3, 4, 5,
                                               have not received their own rate, the                      18 See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid and         6-pentahydroxycaproic acid-hexanoate. GDL
                                               cash-deposit rate will be the China-wide                Derivative Products from the People’s Republic of     has a molecular formula of C6H10O6. GDL has
                                               rate; and (3) for all non-Chinese                       China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty    a CAS registry number of 90–80–2, and can
                                               exporters of subject merchandise which                  Determination and Alignment of Final                  also be called d-glucono-1,5-lactone.
                                                                                                       Determination With Final Antidumping Duty
                                               have not received their own rate, the                   Determination, 83 FR 23888 (May 23, 2018)
                                                                                                                                                                The merchandise covered by the scope of
                                               cash-deposit rate will be the rate                      (Preliminary Affirmative CVD Determination) and       the investigation is currently classified in the
                                               applicable to the Chinese exporter/                     accompanying Preliminary Determination                Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
                                                                                                       Memorandum at 19 (‘‘As AFA, pursuant to section       States (HTSUS) under subheadings
                                               producer combination that supplied that                 776(a) and (b), Commerce is finding all programs      2918.16.1000, 2918.16.5010, and
                                               non-Chinese exporter. These                             initiated upon in this proceeding to be               2932.20.5020. Merchandise covered by the
                                               suspension-of-liquidation instructions                  countervailable—that is, they provide a financial     scope may also enter under HTSUS
                                               will remain in effect until further notice.             contribution within the meaning of sections
                                                                                                       771(5)(B)(i) and (D) of the Act, confer a benefit     subheadings 2918.16.5050, 3824.99.2890,
                                               Because there has been no                               within the meaning of section 771(5)(B) of the Act,   and 3824.99.9295. Although the HTSUS
                                               demonstration that an adjustment for                    and are specific within the meaning of section        subheadings and CAS registry numbers are
                                               domestic subsidies is warranted,                        771(5A) of the Act. Accordingly, all programs are     provided for convenience and customs
                                                                                                       included in Commerce’s calculation of an AFA rate     purposes, the written description of the
                                               Commerce has not made any such                          for Fuyang, Hongyu Chemical, Kaison, and Qingdao      merchandise is dispositive.
                                               adjustment to the rate assigned to                      Dongxiao.’’) (emphasis added). In the final
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES




                                               Xingzhou Medicine or the China-wide                     determination of the companion countervailing         Appendix II
                                               entity. Additionally, Commerce is                       duty investigation, Commerce made no changes to
                                                                                                       its analysis and calculations of subsidy rates from   List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
                                               making no adjustments for export                        the Preliminary Affirmative CVD Determination.        Decision Memorandum
                                               subsidies to the antidumping cash                       See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid and
                                                                                                                                                             I. Summary
                                               deposit rate in this investigation                      Derivative Products from the People’s Republic of
                                                                                                                                                             II. List of Issues
                                                                                                       China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
                                               because we have made no findings in                     Determination, and accompanying Issues and            III. Background
                                               the companion countervailing duty                       Decision Memorandum.                                  IV. Scope of Investigation



                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:30 Sep 20, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00005   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM   21SEN1


                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices                                                     47879

                                               V. Discussion of the Issues                             May 30, 2018, Fuyang, the sole                         investigation, see Appendix I to this
                                                 Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts               respondent to provide a questionnaire                  notice.
                                                    Available (AFA) to the China-wide                  response in this investigation, notified
                                                    Entity                                                                                                    Period of Investigation
                                                                                                       Commerce that it would no longer be
                                                 Comment 2: Whether to Assign the China-
                                                                                                       participating in the proceeding.2 On                      The period of investigation is January
                                                    Wide Entity Rate to the Separate Rate
                                                    Applicant                                          June 21, 2018, the petitioner submitted                1, 2016, through December 31, 2016.
                                                 Comment 3: Whether the Scope of the                   a case brief.3 We received no comments                 Analysis of Comments Received
                                                    Investigation Should be Modified                   from other interested parties.
                                               VI. Recommendation                                                                                               All issues raised in the case brief
                                                                                                          Additional background on this case,                 submitted by the petitioner are
                                               [FR Doc. 2018–20606 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am]             including a summary of events that                     addressed in the Issues and Decision
                                               BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                  occurred since Commerce published the                  Memorandum accompanying this
                                                                                                       Preliminary Determination, and a                       notice. A list of the issues addressed in
                                                                                                       discussion of comments from the                        the memorandum is attached to this
                                               DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  petitioner, are provided in the Issues                 notice at Appendix II.
                                                                                                       and Decision Memorandum, which is
                                               International Trade Administration                                                                             Adverse Facts Available
                                                                                                       hereby adopted by this notice.4 The
                                               [C–570–072]                                             Issues and Decision Memorandum is a                      In this final determination, we
                                                                                                       public document and is on file                         continue to apply facts available with an
                                               Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid and                     electronically via Enforcement and                     adverse inference to Fuyang, Hongyu
                                               Derivative Products From the People’s                   Compliance’s Antidumping and                           Chemical, Kaison, and Qingdao
                                               Republic of China: Final Affirmative                    Countervailing Duty Centralized                        Dongxiao. For purposes of this final
                                               Countervailing Duty Determination                       Electronic Service System (ACCESS).                    determination, we relied on facts
                                               AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                    ACCESS is available to registered users                available and, because the respondents
                                               International Trade Administration,                     at https://access.trade.gov and is                     did not respond, or did not act to the
                                               Department of Commerce.                                 available to all parties in the Central                best of their ability in responding to, our
                                               SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
                                                                                                       Records Unit, room B8024 of the main                   requests for information, we drew
                                               (Commerce) determines that                              Department of Commerce building. In                    adverse inferences in selecting from
                                               countervailable subsidies are being                     addition, a complete version of the                    among the facts otherwise available,
                                               provided to producers and exporters of                  Issues and Decision Memorandum can                     pursuant to sections 776(a)–(b) of the
                                               sodium gluconate, gluconic acid and                     be accessed directly at http://                        Act.6 A detailed discussion of our
                                               derivative products from the People’s                   enforcement.trade.gov. The signed and                  application of adverse facts available
                                               Republic of China (China).                              electronic versions of the Issues and                  was provided in the Preliminary
                                                                                                       Decision Memorandum are identical in                   Decision Memorandum accompanying
                                               DATES: Applicable September 21, 2018.
                                                                                                       content.                                               our Preliminary Determination, and
                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                                                               additional discussion is contained in
                                               Robert Galantucci or Jonathan Hill, AD/                 Scope of the Investigation
                                                                                                                                                              the Issues and Decision Memorandum
                                               CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement                                                                         accompanying this notice.
                                                                                                          The products covered by this
                                               and Compliance, International Trade
                                                                                                       investigation are sodium gluconate,                    Changes Since the Preliminary
                                               Administration, U.S. Department of
                                                                                                       gluconic acid, and derivative products                 Determination
                                               Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
                                                                                                       from China. We have made no changes
                                               NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone                                                                              In our Preliminary Determination, we
                                                                                                       to the scope of the investigation, as
                                               (202) 482–2923 or (202) 482–3518,                                                                              applied adverse facts available to
                                                                                                       published in the Preliminary
                                               respectively.                                                                                                  calculate the subsidy rates for all
                                                                                                       Determination.5 For a complete
                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              description of the scope of this                       mandatory respondents. We have made
                                                                                                                                                              no changes to our analysis, or to the
                                               Background                                                                                                     respondents’ subsidy rates, for this final
                                                                                                       Determination and Alignment of Final
                                                 This final determination is made in                   Determination with Final Antidumping Duty              determination.
                                               accordance with section 705 of the                      Determination, 83 FR 23888 (May 23, 2018)
                                                                                                                                                              Final Determination
                                               Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).               (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying
                                                                                                       Preliminary Decision Memorandum.                         With respect to the ‘‘all-others’’ rate,
                                               The petitioner in this investigation is                   2 See Letter from Fuyang, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
                                               PMP Fermentation Products, Inc. (the                    Investigation on Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid,
                                                                                                                                                              section 705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act
                                               petitioner). The mandatory respondents                  and Derivative Products from the People’s Republic     provides that if the countervailing duty
                                               in this investigation are Qingdao                       of China: Notice of Non-Participation in               rates established for all exporters and
                                                                                                       Investigation,’’ dated May 30, 2018.                   producers individually investigated are
                                               Dongxiao Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Qingdao                    3 See Letter from the petitioner, ‘‘Countervailing
                                               Dongxiao), Shandong Fuyang                                                                                     determined entirely in accordance with
                                                                                                       Duty Investigation of Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic
                                               Biotechnology Co. (Fuyang), Shandong                    Acid and Derivative Products from the People’s         section 776 of the Act, Commerce may
                                               Kaison Biochemical Co Ltd (Kaison),                     Republic of China: Petitioner’s Case Brief,’’ dated    use any reasonable method to establish
                                               and Tongxiang Hongyu Chemical Co.,                      June 21, 2018.                                         an all-others rate for exporters and
                                                                                                         4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
                                               Ltd. (Hongyu Chemical). Hongyu                                                                                 producers not individually investigated.
                                                                                                       Memorandum for the Final Affirmative
                                               Chemical, Kaison, and Qingdao                           Determination in the Countervailing Duty
                                                                                                                                                              In this case, the rates assigned to
                                                                                                                                                              Fuyang, Hongyu Chemical, Kaison, and
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES




                                               Dongxiao did not respond to any of our                  Investigation of Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid
                                               requests for information.                               and Derivative Products from the People’s Republic
                                                                                                       of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby          6 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. Section
                                                 We published our Preliminary                          adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision           782(i) of the Act requires Commerce to verify a
                                               Determination on May 23, 2018.1 On                      Memorandum).                                           respondent’s data as part of an investigation.
                                                                                                         5 See 83 FR at 23888 (noting that Commerce           However, because we applied adverse facts
                                                 1 See Sodium Gluconate, Gluconic Acid, and            would consider scope comments from interested          available to each of the respondents in the
                                               Derivative Products from the People’s Republic of       parties and implement any changes to the scope in      Preliminary Determination, we did not conduct
                                               China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty      the final countervailing duty determination).          verification in this investigation.



                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:30 Sep 20, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00006   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM   21SEN1



Document Created: 2018-09-21 00:23:44
Document Modified: 2018-09-21 00:23:44
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable September 21, 2018.
ContactMagd Zalok or Stephen Bailey, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4162 or (202) 482-0193, respectively.
FR Citation83 FR 47876 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR